Next Article in Journal
PI3K/AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway Is Required for JCPyV Infection in Primary Astrocytes
Next Article in Special Issue
Oxidative Stress and AKT-Associated Angiogenesis in a Zebrafish Model and Its Potential Application for Withanolides
Previous Article in Journal
Signaling through the S1P−S1PR Axis in the Gut, the Immune and the Central Nervous System in Multiple Sclerosis: Implication for Pathogenesis and Treatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
FDA-Approved Drug Screening for Compounds That Facilitate Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells (HSPCs) Expansion in Zebrafish
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/cells10113219
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Anti-Tumoral Potential of Phosphonate Analog of Sulforaphane in Zebrafish Xenograft Model

by
Magdalena Rudzinska-Radecka
1,2,
Łukasz Janczewski
3,
Anna Gajda
3,
Marlena Godlewska
4,
Malgorzata Chmielewska-Krzesinska
5,
Krzysztof Wasowicz
5 and
Piotr Podlasz
5,*
1
Foundation of Research and Science Development, Rydygiera 8, 01-793 Warsaw, Poland
2
Institute of Molecular Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
3
Institute of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Lodz University of Technology, Zeromskiego 116, 90-924 Lodz, Poland
4
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Marymoncka 99/103, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland
5
Department of Pathophysiology, Forensic Veterinary Medicine and Administration, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2021, 10(11), 3219; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10113219
Submission received: 25 October 2021 / Revised: 14 November 2021 / Accepted: 16 November 2021 / Published: 18 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fishing for Health: Zebrafish Models of Human Disease)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Isothiocyanates (ITCs) show strong activity against numerous human tumors. Five structurally diverse ITCs were tested in vivo using the zebrafish embryos 6 and 48 h post-fertilization (hpf). The survival rate, hatching time, and gross morphological changes were assessed 24, 48, and 72 h after treatment with all compounds in various doses (1–10 µM). As a result, we selected a phosphonate analog of sulforaphane (P-ITC; 1–3 µM) as a non-toxic treatment for zebrafish embryos, both 6 and 48 hpf. Furthermore, the in vivo anti-cancerogenic studies with selected 3 µM P-ITC were performed using a set of cell lines derived from the brain (U87), cervical (HeLa), and breast (MDA-MB-231) tumors. For the experiment, cells were labeled using red fluorescence dye Dil (1,1′-Dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-Tetramethylindocarbocyanine, 10 μg/mL) and injected into the hindbrain ventricle, yolk sac region and Cuvier duct of zebrafish embryos. The tumor size measurement after 48 h of treatment demonstrated the significant inhibition of cancer cell growth in all tested cases by P-ITC compared to the non-treated controls. Our studies provided evidence for P-ITC anti-cancerogenic properties with versatile activity against different cancer types. Additionally, P-ITC demonstrated the safety of use in the living organism at various stages of embryogenesis.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Isothiocyanates (ITCs; sulfur-containing substances) are naturally occurring small molecules formed from glucosinolate precursors in cruciferous vegetables, including cabbage, kale, broccoli, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts and kohlrabi [1]. It was already shown that both natural and synthetic ITCs display anti-carcinogenic activity by affecting multiple mechanisms, including apoptosis, metastasis, vascularization, cell cycle, oxidative stress and epigenetic mechanisms [2,3] (Figure 1).
The analysis has shown that ITCs chemopreventive activity is exerted due to favorable modification of phase I and phase II enzymes activity and carcinogen metabolism. This reaction increases carcinogen secretion or detoxification that consequently decreases carcinogen-DNA interactions [5]. In this scenario, a variety of ITCs can prevent development of many tumor types, such as murine osteosarcoma [6], human mammary gland [7,8], esophagus [9], liver [10], colon [11], and bladder [12] carcinomas. Many studies presented structural diversity of ITCs, and their synthetic analogs have been successfully tested [8,13]. ITCs are considered to be safe without serious adverse effects in humans [14]; moreover anti-oxidant [15], anti-inflammatory [16], anti-microbial [17], neuroprotective [18] and cardioprotective [19] effects were reported.
Recent progress in pharmaceutical screening with zebrafish (Danio rerio) and its use as a xenograft model of human tumors has shown that zebrafish is a reliable organism for evaluating safety of new treatments and cancer xenotransplantation studies [20]. The transparent embryos of zebrafish, which develop outside the maternal organism with most organ primordia being formed 24 h after fertilization (hpf), have made zebrafish the ideal subject in toxicity tests [21]. Additionally, a series of adverse morphological phenotypes and behavioral endpoints are used to predict the mechanism of action for treatment perniciousness [22]. In the context of xenotransplantation, the embryonic zebrafish xenografts of human tumors can be a beneficiary laboratory model that can be used to understand cancer biology and as a reliable alternative for mice in the studies of drugs that target tumor progression [23,24].
Five structurally different ITCs (LJ-NCS-1–5) were previously designed and tested in vitro using cell lines derived from human colon, lung, mammary gland and uterus carcinomas and in vivo by a murine mammary gland carcinoma model. All compounds exhibited high anti-proliferative activity, with the potential to induce G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis.
Here, we aimed to use zebrafish embryos as an alternative vertebrate model to identify non-toxic drug candidates at the different stages of embryogenesis. As a result, we selected the 3 µM phosphonate analog of sulforaphane (LJ-NCS-2; P-ITC) as the safest treatment without visible teratogenic effects. Next, we tested the anti-cancerogenic properties of P-ITC for cell lines derived from the brain (U87), cervical (HeLa) and breast (MDA-MB-231) carcinomas, which were injected into the hindbrain ventricle, yolk sac region and Cuvier duct of zebrafish embryos, respectively. The tumor size measurement after P-ITC treatment demonstrated the significant inhibition of cancer cell growth in all studied cases.
To our knowledge, the anti-tumoral potential of P-ITC was never investigated using zebrafish embryo xenografts.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemistry

The tested ITCs are presented in Table 1.
ITCs LJ-NCS-1–5 are known compounds and were previously synthesized using three described methods.
Isothiocyanates LJ-NCS-1, LJ-NCS-4, and LJ-NCS-5 were obtained in one-pot, two-step microwave-assisted synthesis. In the first step, primary amines LJ-1, LJ-4, and LJ-5 in the presence of carbon disulfide (CS2) and triethylamine (Et3N) were transformed in normal reaction at room temperature and in 5 min time to dithiocarbamates LJ-D-1, LJ-D-4, and LJ-D-5. They were then converted to final ITCs with good and excellent yields (61–87%) in the second step in a microwave reactor (20 min, 90 °C) without any desulfurating reagent (Figure 2) [28].
ITC LJ-NCS-3 was also synthesized in a one-pot, two-step microwave-assisted synthesis using CS2, Et3N and hydrochloride LJ-3 as substrate under changed microwave treatment. In the first step, intermediate dithiocarbamate LJ-D-3 was obtained under the same conditions as LJ-D-1, LJ-D-4, and LJ-D-5 (Figure 2); however, the second step–desulfurization of LJ-D-3-was performed using microwave-assisted synthesis in a shorter time and the same temperature (3 min, 90 °C), and additionally in the presence of desulfurating agent–DMT/NMM/TsO−. LJ-NCS-3 was isolated with efficiency of 75% (Figure 3) [26].
The last ITC LJ-NCS-2 was obtained using another method based on the tandem Staudinger/aza–Wittig reaction and using azide LJ-2 as a substrate. In this synthesis diethyl 6-azidohexylphosphonate (LJ-2) [29] was converted with high yields (75%) in the corresponding diethyl 6-(isothiocyanate)hexylphosphonate (LJ-NCS-2) in a one-pot, two-step reaction with triphenylphosphine (PPh3) and CS2 (Figure 4) [8].

2.2. Zebrafish Maintenance

Transgenic zebrafish Tg(fli1:EGFP)y1 strain (a transparent zebrafish kind that expresses enhanced GFP in the entire vasculature under the control of the fli1 promoter, and thus enables the visualization of vascular defects in live zebrafish embryos) was kept at 27 °C in aquaria with 14/10h day/night light cycle (14 hours of light/10 hours of darkness) The embryos were raised at 28,5 °C in E3 medium (5 mM NaCl. 0.17 mM KCl. 0.33 mM CaCl2. 0.33 mM MgSO4) until the desired developmental stages [24]. Embryos at 6 and 48 hpf were treated 24, 48 and 72 h with ITCs in doses: 1–10 µM.

2.3. Cell Culture

The U87 (human glioblastoma), HeLa (cervical tumor) and MDA-MB-231 (triple-negative breast cancer) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).
Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Life Technologies, Gibco, NY, USA) or RPMI-1640 medium (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Roche, Mannheim, Germany) at 37 °C in a humidified 95% air and 5% CO2 atmosphere. All cell lines were checked using PCR assay for mycoplasma and were free of contamination.

2.4. Embryotoxic Test of Isothiocyanates in Zebrafish

For embryotoxicity evaluation, 50 healthy embryos of AB wild-type strain (6 and 48 hpf) were used. Different concentrations of ITCs (110 µM) suspended in 0.05% of DMSO in E3 medium were added to the well plate and incubated at 28.5 °C for 48 h. The control was treated with 0.05% of DMSO in E3. The zebrafish embryos were evaluated for malformations after 24, 48 and 72 h using stereomicroscope (SteREO Discovery.V8, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) to evaluate the embryotoxicity of the substances. In this scenario, morphological phenotypes, including malformed yolk sacs, tail malformations, delayed development and impaired motor activity, were observed. The motility of the embryos was recorded by microscopic observation; in addition, for experiment with treatment of 6 hpf embryos after 24 h treatment, the 5 min. videos were recorded and analyzed by DanioScope software (Noldus, the Netherlands). The hatching rate was monitored at 72 hpf stage of development for experiment with treatment of embryos from 6 hpf.

2.5. Microinjection of Human Tumor Cells into Zebrafish Embryos

The U87, HeLa and MDA-MB-231 cells were washed, trypsinized and re-suspended in PBS. Then the cells were stained with lipophilic red fluorescence dye Dil (1,1′-Dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-Tetramethylindocarbocyanine Perchlorate; 10 μg/mL; ThermoFisher, Waltman, MA, USA) for 20 min. Furthermore, cells were washed three times in PBS and re-suspended in PBS with 0.5 mM EDTA; the technique was previously described [30]. Before the experiment, part of non-dechorionated embryos was entirely immersed in embryo medium, transferred with a glass pipette, and maintained in agarose-coated (1% in embryo medium) plastic dishes. Then, the medium was carefully poured out and the plastic dish was slowly filled with fresh embryo medium. The steps were repeated three times altogether. The mild agitation facilitated the removal of the chorions.
For microinjection of tumor cells, the Tg(fli1:EGFP)y1 zebrafish embryos 48 hpf were anesthetized with 0.02% tricaine (MS-222; Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). A total of 500 cells (5 nL) were injected into the (U-87) hindbrain ventricle as described [31], (HeLa) middle of the embryonic yolk sac region [32] and (MDA-MB-231) into Cuvier duct through which cells migrated to the caudal hematopoietic tissue [33]. All embryos were separately seeded in a 48-well plate for a detailed monitoring of each individual.

2.6. Xenograft Exposure Assay

24 h after injection the viable embryos with fluorescent cells were screened with a fluorescence microscope and selected for further 48 h treatment. The embryos were incubated at 35 °C with 3 µM P-ITC or without P-ITC/with 0.05% DMSO (as a control) for the next 48 h. After 24 h, the medium was exchanged with fresh one in all wells. Zebrafish embryos xenotransplanted with cancer cell lines were anesthetized with 0.02% tricaine and imaged by fluorescence microscope just before (0 h) and 48 h from starting the treatment. The size of the tumor area was measured as a fluorescence intensity with ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) at the beginning of the experiment (0 h) and after 48 h after treatment. The tumor mass was calculated as a percentage-the average tumor size after 48 h compared to starting 0 h point. At the end of the experiment, confocal microscopy was used–we wanted to avoid monitoring the embryos during the experiment to minimize the laser exposition time. For confocal microscopy analysis the zebrafish larvae were anesthetized with 0.02% tricaine. Then they were examined with a LSM 700 confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss, Germany). The eGFP and DiI were excited by solid-state lasers (488 nm and 555 nm, respectively). For tumor-focused images 20× objective was used and z-stacks at 2-micron intervals were taken using ZEN software (Zeiss, Germany) for each channel. Stacks of images were compiled to produce maximum intensity projection images with ZEN software (Zeiss, Germany). Additionally, each optical section was analyzed separately, section by section, to detect even small details.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

We used GraphPad, Prism 6.00 for Windows, Graph Pad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Data are reported as mean ± SD. Data were analyzed using a non-parametric U-Mann–Whitney test (GraphPad, Prism 6.00 for Windows, Graf Pad software, San Diego, CA, USA). The p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant with * p < 0.05, ** p  <  0.01 and *** p  <  0.001.

3. Results

3.1. Structurally Diverse Isothiocyanates in 1–10 µM Concentration Rate Showed a Different Toxic Effect in Zebrafish Embryos

To investigate the developmental toxicity of ITCs LJ-NCS-1–5 (1–10 µM) on 6 hpf and 48 hpf zebrafish embryos, the mortality, malformation and morphological abnormalities rates were recorded 24, 48, and 72 h after treatments. ITCs concentrations were set up based on the previous experiments.
Here, we aimed to find the non-toxic ITC/-s during 72 h of treatment for younger (6 hpf) and older (48 hpf) zebrafish embryos.
First, we assessed the ITCs/LJ-NCS-1–5 toxicity for a younger/ more sensitive embryos, and we found that the highest concentration (10 µM) of all substances was lethal to them (Figure 5). From all tested ITCs, the LJ-NCS-3 showed the strongest toxicity and 100% mortality rate in all doses. Next, 2–5 µM of LJ-NCS-1 was harmful to all tested organisms, whereas 5 µM LJ-NCS-5 induced yolk malformations in 35% p < 0.05) of embryos. Zebrafish embryos were not affected by 1–1.5 µM LJ-NCS-1, 1–5µM LJ-NCS-2 and LJ-NCS-4 and 1–4 µM LJ-NCS-5 at this time point.
After 48 h the 1–1.5 µM LJ-NCS-1, 1–4 µM LJ-NCS-2, 1–1.5 µM LJ-NCS-4 and 1µM LJ-NCS-5 concentrations showed no significant increase in the death rate and no deformations were detected in all cases (Figure 6). At this time point, 5 µM LJ-NCS-2, 2–5 µM LJ-NCS-4 and 1.5–5 µM LJ-NCS-5 were lethal to all embryos.
After 72 h the hatching rate was significantly decreased in the groups treated with 1.5 µM LJ-NCS-1, 4 µM LJ-NCS-2 and 1.5 µM LJ-NCS-4 (~25–30% of unhatched embryos; p < 0.05) compared with the control group (Figure 7). A total of 1 µM LJ-NCS-5 was lethal after 72 h of treatment. Totals of 1 and 1.5 µM of LJ-NCS-1 did not significantly decrease viability (94% and 86% viable embryos, respectively); however, both led to immobile embryos. Then, the majority (~83%; p < 0.001) of viable embryos exposed to 1 µM of LJ-NCS-4 demonstrated morphological malformations. Only 1–3 µM LJ-NCS-2 exposure did not induce any toxic effect in zebrafish embryos with a high viability ratio, being ~95–98%.

3.2. Phosphonate Analog of Sulforaphane as the Safest Treatment for Zebrafish Embryos at Different Stages of Development

Based on our observations using 6 hpf zebrafish embryos treated with ITCs, for further analysis with 48 hpf embryos, we tested a narrower doses range: 1–3 µM. In consequence, the 24 h treatment with 2–3 µM LJ-NCS-3 and 3 µM LJ-NCS-4–5 demonstrated a significant (2 µM LJ-NCS-3 and 3 µM LJ-NCS-4, p < 0.01; 3 µM LJ-NCS-3, p = 0.0043; 3 µM LJ-NCS-5, p = 0.0003) reduction of viable embryos and strong morphological malformations (especially of axis/in the tail region) in most (~86–92%; p < 0.001) analyzed embryos (Figure 8).
The 48 h time point demonstrated the lethality in the case of 1–3 µM LJ-NCS-3, 2–3 µM LJ-NCS-4 and -5 (Figure 9). The 3 µM LJ-NCS-1, 1µM LJ-NCS-4 and LJ-NCS-5 exposure revealed a significant (3 µM LJ-NCS-1, p = 0.0079; 1µM LJ-NCS-4, p = 0.0006; LJ-NCS-5, p = 0.025) decrease of viability and increase of fishtail deformations in ~55% of tested embryos. The exposure to 1–2 µM LJ-NCS-1 and 1–3 µM LJ-NCS-2 did not affect zebrafish embryo survival and body shape.
Next, after 72 h, 1–2 µM LJ-NCS-1 did not decrease the viability of tested embryos; however, the subjects were motionless; the 3 µM dose caused substantial survival reduction and fishtail deformations in ~70% of cases (p = 0.006) (Figure 10A). LJ-NCS-4 killed all tested subjects. LJ-NCS-5 at the minimal dose remarkably (p = 0.012) decreased the survival of zebrafish embryos; however, the viable ones were in good condition. Finally, at all time points, the LJ-NCS-2/P-ITC did not reduce the survival and its presence did not lead to any morphological malformations. Additionally, we checked the highest tested dose of P-ITC (3 µM) in the context of vascularization (main and enteral vessels), and we did not observe any difference between treated and control embryos after 24, 48 and 72 h from the starting point (48 hpf; Figure 10B).
Based on all results using 6 and 48 hpf embryos, we selected P-ITC (3 µM) for further studies using human cancer xenograft model in zebrafish embryos.

3.3. Phosphonate Analog of Sulforaphane Significantly Reduces the Human Cancer Cells Growth in Zebrafish Xenograft Models

The zebrafish model has recently emerged as a new system to study cancer progression which allows assessing cancer cell invasion over a short timescale. Here we performed the experiment based on various cancer cell lines injected into different organs, which aimed to show the universal effect of the tested compound. In the assay, U87, HeLa and MDA-MB-231 cancer cells were labeled with a red fluorescent Dil dye and injected into the hindbrain ventricle (Figure 11A), yolk sac region (Figure 11B) and Cuvier duct (transported to caudal hematopoietic tissue via blood vein) Figure 11C) of 2-day old embryos. After 24 h we selected human cancer cell-positive embryos and performed 48 h treatment with 3 µM P-ITC; control with 0.05% DMSO. The P-ITC exposure of zebrafish xenografts resulted in a significant decreases in glioblastoma (p = 0.0022), cervical (p = 0.028) and breast cancer (p = 0.026) growth compared to the non-treated control. To validate the tumor growth, we measured the size of the fluorescent rim in the brain, yolk, and caudal hematopoietic tissue in the same individuals (seeded separately in a 48-well plate) at the beginning of the study (0 h) and 48 h after treatment. Thus, we calculated the tumor size after 48 h (in percent) after treatment compared to the starting point of the experiment (0 h—the start of the treatment). At the end of the experiment, we analyzed embryos under a confocal microscope (Figure 11D). We did not observe metastatic sites during experiments and tumor cells occurred only on the site of injection.

4. Discussion

The evidence emerging from many in vitro and in vivo studies has revealed that ITCs show promising anti-tumoral potential [34]. The ability of ITCs to inhibit tumorigenesis depended on the target tissues, animal species, specific carcinogen employed and their structure [4,34]. For example, a longer alkyl carbon chain of arylalkyl ITCs is directly proportional to stronger chemopreventive effect in NNK-induced mouse lung carcinogenesis [35].
The mechanisms of cytotoxic and cytostatic effects of ITC include acceleration of apoptosis, blocking the cell cycle progression and angiogenesis [36,37]. Regulation of apoptosis by ITC is accomplished through the mitochondrial release of cytochrome c, Bcl-2 family regulation, MAPK signaling and subsequent activation of caspase −3 and −9 [38,39]. Cell cycle arrest caused by ITC occurs mainly in the G2/M phase. As a result, G2-phase regulators, including cyclin B1, cell division cycle (Cdc) 2 and Cdc25C, are down-regulated or inhibited and tubulin polymerization and mitotic spindle assembly are disrupted [40,41].
The previous study performed by Gajda D. et al., 2017 on P-ITC fully characterized its chemical properties and showed its anti-proliferative activity in vitro in cells derived from the human colon, lung, mammary gland and uterus carcinomas. P-ITC treatment led to the arrest of cell cycle and effectively induced cell death. Furthermore, P-ITC anti-tumor activity was confirmed in vivo using murine mammary gland carcinoma 4T1 model, in which it reduced tumor mass after compound administration [8].
In the present study, we assessed the toxicity of structurally different ITCs with exposure of zebrafish embryos starting 6 and 48 hpf and monitoring the effect 24, 48 and 72 h after exposure. These experiments validated the toxicity of ITCs on the varied stages of zebrafish embryos development, including the early–6 hpf and older 48 hpf embryos. The use of the young embryos (6 hpf) in the experiments allowed for determination if ITCs are harmful to the early stage of embryogenesis, while the tests on 48 hpf embryos provided the necessary basis for the xenograft transplantation experiments. Thus, the five tested ITCs showed the dose and structure-dependent manner of toxicity. LJ-NCS-3 presented the highest toxicity with lethality or induction of embryos body deformations at all time points of treatments for most tested doses. We found that 1–3 µM LJ-NCS-1 after 72 h was toxic for both 6 and 48 hpf embryos and impaired development, movement and/or morphology; additionally, every higher dose was lethal for the organisms. Next, 1–1.5 µM of LJ-NCS-4 allowed for survival of embryos at the end of exposure; however, the treatment caused 6 hpf zebrafish embryo axis and tail defects and led to delayed hatching. For 48 hpf embryos, LJ-NCS-4 was harmful in all tested doses. Then, 1 µM LJ-NCS-5 exposure left 48 hpf embryos with proper morphology; however, the survival rate was significantly decreased. Moreover, this substance was toxic for the younger zebrafish embryos. Finally, LJ-NCS-2 (P-ITC) showed good outcomes for 6 and 48 hpf embryos and 1–3 µM did not affect morphology, development, movement and vascularization.
To summarize, this set of experiments allowed us to select LJ-NCS-2/P-ITC as the non-toxic ITC treatment for zebrafish embryos in various stages of development.
Embryonic zebrafish is increasingly used as a toxicological model to conduct in vivo developmental toxicity assays [42]. Zebrafish features genetic homology and similarity of molecular pathways to humans, robust phenotypes, the possibility of high throughput genetic and chemical screening [42,43,44]. The toxicity testing using the fish embryos can be carried out more quickly than the standard test with mammals, uses much less space, costs, efforts and may uncover additional sub-lethal effects [45].
Recently, zebrafish has been established as a vertebrate model system useful in studying human diseases [46] with outcomes showing high probability of relevance to mammals, including humans [47]. The rapid development of zebrafish embryos and their permeability render this model suitable for screening novel molecules/substances/pharmaceutics and studies of the practical effects [48]. Furthermore, extending the usefulness of these vertebrates, current reports have shown the feasibility of transplanting cancer cells into zebrafish embryos to study tumor proliferation and growth mechanisms [49]. The zebrafish embryo lacks anti-tumor immunity and will not reject transplanted human tumor cells, partly because the T-cell receptor gene is not expressed in extrathymic sites before 9 days post-fertilization [50].
Based on that, we checked the anti-tumorigenic activity of the selected agent−3 µM P-ITC, against three highly malignant cell lines derived from glioblastoma (U87), cervical (HeLa) and breast (MDA-MB-231) carcinomas. Initially, by a standard scratch assay, we established that 3 µM P-ITC can inhibit the motility of cancer cells (data not shown).
Herein, the red fluorescence-labeled tumor cells were injected into the Tg(fli1:eGFP) transgenic zebrafish line showing GFP expression in vasculature. The transplantation was performed injecting three cell lines into different places to show that P-ITC can affect successfully various tissues and affect the growth of various tumor types; following U87 cancers were injected to the hindbrain ventricle, HeLa to the yolk sac region and MDA-MB-231 into the Cuvier duct through which cells migrated to the caudal hematopoietic tissue, by bloodstream. After 24 h we selected human cell-positive subjects and treated them 48 h with P-ITC. All three models showed a significant reduction of cancerogenic mass development compared to non-treated controls. The data confirmed the anti-tumor effect of P-ITC, which was previously studied in the murine breast cancer model and the results suggested that P-ITC has broader activity in the cancer tissue context and can actively inhibit various tumors growth. Additionally, as first we presented ITC effect using the zebrafish xenografts.
ITC functional moiety presented the ability to inhibit development of chemically induced cancer, oncogenic-driven tumor formation, and human tumor xenografts growth in rodents [51]. ITCs alone can suppress in vitro and in vivo growth of various cancer cells (such as non–small-cell lung cancer cells [52], human malignant astrocytoma cells [53], breast [54], ovarian [55] and HCT 116 human colon cancer cells [56]), but also sensitize them to cytostatic drugs used as standard in therapies [57,58].
In this context, in vivo tests demonstrated that benzyl isothiocyanate (B-ITC) suppresses glioblastoma GBM 8401/luc2 cell-induced tumor growth in athymic nude mice. By immunohistochemistry, the authors presented strong signals of caspase-3 and Bax in analyzed tissues [59]. Next, a series of artemisinin derivatives containing an ITC group were synthesized and tested with U87. Performed experiments showed in U87 cells activation of apoptotic pathways (by caspase-9 and -3 up-regulation), the autophagic mechanism (by LC3-II overexpression and silencing of p62) and significantly attenuated cell migration [60].
Anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activity of B-ITC was reported in in vitro studies using advanced ovarian cancer cells. The apoptotic mechanism was activated by caspase signaling and cleavage of PARP-1 [55]. Next, the accumulation of HeLa cells at the G2/M phase was observed 16 h after treatment with allyl isothiocyanate (A-ITC), benzyl or phenethyl isothiocyanate, accompanied by 41–79% of cell growth inhibition [61].
In breast cancer cells, the B-ITC affected carcinogen metabolism and signaling pathways involved in tumor progression and invasion. The authors proved that B-ITC inhibits breast cancer stem cell growth in association with suppressing the full-length receptor tyrosine kinase RON and its active form [51]. Phenethyl isothiocyanate induced apoptosis in HER2-expressing breast tumor-derived cells (MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7) in vitro and in vivo and enhanced the effects of doxorubicin [62]. On the other hand, A-ITC did not present inhibitory activity with MDA-MB-231 cells but stopped only the growth of MCF-7 [63].

5. Conclusions

The present study investigated the structurally different ITCs in vivo embryonic toxicity in zebrafish. According to obtained results, analyzing the effect of five ITCs, we selected P-ITC as the non-harmful treatment for the younger and older zebrafish embryos. These results indicate that structural modifications can significantly modulate the ITCs mode of action.
Next, our investigation demonstrated the high anti-cancer activity of P-ITC against various tumor cells (glioblastoma, breast and cervical carcinomas) accompanied by a high safety of treatment. In this context, our research demonstrated the applicability of the zebrafish embryo as a tool for the novel agent toxicity screening and in vivo model for the analysis of human tumor cell development. Future studies should focus on the molecular target analysis of the presented P-ITC effect and clinical trials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R.-R., P.P.; methodology, M.R.-R., P.P., M.C.-K., Ł.J., A.G., M.G.; software, P.P.; formal analysis, P.P., K.W.; investigation, M.R.-R., P.P., M.C.-K.; resources, K.W.; writing—original draft preparation, M.R.-R.; writing—review and editing, M.R.-R., Ł.J., M.C.-K., P.P., K.W.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Project financially co-supported by the Minister of Education and Science in the range of the program entitled “Regional Initiative of Excellence” for the years 2019–2022, Project No. 010/RID/2018/19, amount of funding 12,000,000 PLN.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All zebrafish were housed in the Zebrafish Facility of the Department of Pathophysiology, Forensic Veterinary Medicine and Administration, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland, which was built according to the local animal welfare standards. All animal procedures were performed in accordance with Polish and European Union animal welfare guidelines. According to the European Directive 2010/63/EU and Polish law regulations, O.J. of 2015, item 266, all procedures performed in the present study including the use of early life-stage zebrafish do not require Ethics Committee permissions.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data is not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.

Acknowledgments

The authors want to thank: Tadeusz Gajda and Beata Kolesińska for their helpful discussion, Karolina Czarnecka-Chrebelska for help with establishing collaboration and Anna Przyborowska for technical assistance in conducting experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Masahiko, I.; Masakazu, H.; Nobuko, F.; Tomohiro, K.; Yasujiro, M. Glucosinolate metabolism, functionality and breeding for the improvement of Brassicaceae vegetables. Breed. Sci. 2014, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Lung Cheung, K.; Kong, A.N. Molecular targets of dietary phenethyl isothiocyanate and sulforaphane for cancer chemoprevention. AAPS J. 2010, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Fuentes, F.; Paredes-Gonzalez, X.; Kong, A.N.T. Dietary Glucosinolates Sulforaphane, Phenethyl Isothiocyanate, Indole-3-Carbinol/3,3’-Diindolylmethane: Anti-Oxidative Stress/Inflammation, Nrf2, Epigenetics/Epigenomics and In Vivo Cancer Chemopreventive Efficacy. Curr. Pharmacol. Rep. 2015, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Wu, X.; Zhou, Q.; Xu, K. Are isothiocyanates potential anti-cancer drugs? Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2009, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Hecht, S.S. Chemoprevention of lung cancer by isothiocyanates. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1996, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Matsui, T.A.; Murata, H.; Sakabe, T.; Sowa, Y.; Horie, N.; Nakanishi, R.; Sakai, T.; Kubo, T. Sulforaphane induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in murine osteosarcoma cells in vitro and inhibits tumor growth in vivo. Oncol. Rep. 2007, 18, 1263–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sehrawat, A.; Singh, S.V. Benzyl isothiocyanate inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cultured and xenografted human breast cancer cells. Cancer Prev. Res. 2011, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Psurski, M.; Janczewski, Ł.; Świtalska, M.; Gajda, A.; Goszczyński, T.M.; Oleksyszyn, J.; Wietrzyk, J.; Gajda, T. Novel phosphonate analogs of sulforaphane: Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo anticancer activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 132, 63–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lütken, C.D.; Fiehn, A.M.K.; Federspiel, B.; Achiam, M.P. Impact of isolated tumor cells in regional lymph nodes in adeno-and squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus and the esophagogastric junction-A systematic review. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2019, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhu, M.; Li, W.; Dong, X.; Chen, Y.; Lu, Y.; Lin, B.; Guo, J.; Li, M. Benzyl-isothiocyanate Induces Apoptosis and Inhibits Migration and Invasion of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells in vitro. J. Cancer 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.Q.; Wang, X.-Q.; Meng, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhu, J.-Y.; Chen, J.-Q.; Cao, W.-S.; Wang, X.-Q.; et al. Phenethyl isothiocyanate inhibits colorectal cancer stem cells by suppressing Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Phytother. Res. PTR 2018, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Abbaoui, B.; Lucas, C.R.; Riedl, K.M.; Clinton, S.K.; Mortazavi, A. Cruciferous Vegetables, Isothiocyanates, and Bladder Cancer Prevention. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2018, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Janczewski, Ł.; Psurski, M.; Świtalska, M.; Gajda, A.; Goszczyński, T.M.; Oleksyszyn, J.; Wietrzyk, J.; Gajda, T. Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of ω-(Isothiocyanato)alkylphosphinates and Phosphine Oxides as Antiproliferative Agents. ChemMedChem 2018, 13, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Palliyaguru, D.L.; Yuan, J.M.; Kensler, T.W.; Fahey, J.W. Isothiocyanates: Translating the Power of Plants to People. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2018, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Figueiredo, S.M.; Filho, S.A.V.; Nogueira-Machado, J.A.; Caligiorne, R.B. The anti-oxidant properties of isothiocyanates: A review. Recent Pat. Endocr. Metab. Immune Drug Discov. 2013, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Burčul, F.; Mekinić, I.G.; Radan, M.; Rolli, P.; Blažević, I. Isothiocyanates: Cholinesterase inhibiting, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activity. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2018, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Romeo, L.; Iori, R.; Rollin, P.; Bramanti, P.; Mazzon, E. Isothiocyanates: An Overview of Their Antimicrobial Activity against Human Infections. Molecules 2018, 23, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Latronico, T.; Larocca, M.; Milella, S.; Fasano, S.; Rossano, R.; Liuzzi, G.M. Neuroprotective potential of isothiocyanates in an in vitro model of neuroinflammation. Inflammopharmacology 2021, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Citi, V.; Corvino, A.; Fiorino, F.; Frecentese, F.; Magli, E.; Perissutti, E.; Santagada, V.; Brogi, S.; Flori, L.; Gorica, E.; et al. Structure-activity relationships study of isothiocyanates for H 2 S releasing properties: 3-Pyridyl-isothiocyanate as a new promising cardioprotective agent. J. Adv. Res. 2020, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Hason, M.; Bartůněk, P. Zebrafish Models of Cancer-New Insights on Modeling Human Cancer in a Non-Mammalian Vertebrate. Genes 2019, 10, 935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Chahardehi, A.M.; Arsad, H.; Lim, V. Zebrafish as a Successful Animal Model for Screening Toxicity of Medicinal Plants. Plants 2020, 9, 1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Busquet, F.; Strecker, R.; Rawlings, J.M.; Belanger, S.E.; Braunbeck, T.; Carr, G.J.; Cenijn, P.; Fochtman, P.; Gourmelon, A.; Hübler, N.; et al. OECD validation study to assess intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility of the zebrafish embryo toxicity test for acute aquatic toxicity testing. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. RTP 2014, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hill, D.; Chen, L.; Snaar-Jagalska, E.; Chaudhry, B. Embryonic zebrafish xenograft assay of human cancer metastasis. F1000Research 2018, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Xiao, J.; Glasgow, E.; Agarwal, S. Zebrafish Xenografts for Drug Discovery and Personalized Medicine. Trends Cancer 2020, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gupta, P.; Wright, S.E.; Kim, S.H.; Srivastava, S.K. Phenethyl isothiocyanate: A comprehensive review of anti-cancer mechanisms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Janczewski, Ł.; Kręgiel, D.; Kolesińska, B. Synthesis of Isothiocyanates Using DMT/NMM/TsO—As a New Desulfurization Reagent. Molecules 2021, 26, 2740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mays, J.R.; Roska, R.L.W.; Sarfaraz, S.; Mukhtar, H.; Rajski, S.R. Identification, synthesis, and enzymology of non-natural glucosinolate chemopreventive candidates. Chembiochem Eur. J. Chem. Biol. 2008, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Janczewski, Ł.; Gajda, A.; Gajda, T. Direct, Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Isothiocyanates. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 2528–2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Janczewski, Ł.; Gajda, A.; Braszczyńska, J.; Gajda, T. Microwave-assisted synthesis of dialkyl ω-azidoalkylphosphonates. Synth. Commun. 2016, 46, 1625–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Berens, E.B.; Sharif, G.M.; Wellstein, A.; Glasgow, E. Testing the Vascular Invasive Ability of Cancer Cells in Zebrafish (Danio Rerio). J. Vis. Exp. JoVE 2016, e55007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wehmas, L.C.; Tanguay, R.L.; Punnoose, A.; Greenwood, J.A. Developing a Novel Embryo-Larval Zebrafish Xenograft Assay to Prioritize Human Glioblastoma Therapeutics. Zebrafish 2016, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Marques, I.J.; Weiss, F.U.; Vlecken, D.H.; Nitsche, C.; Bakkers, J.; Lagendijk, A.K.; Partecke, L.I.; Heidecke, C.L.; Lerch, M.M.; Bagowski, C.P. Metastatic behaviour of primary human tumours in a zebrafish xenotransplantation model. BMC Cancer 2009, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Ren, J.; Liu, S.; Cui, C.; Dijke, P. Invasive Behavior of Human Breast Cancer Cells in Embryonic Zebrafish. J. Vis. Exp. JoVE 2017, e55459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mitsiogianni, M.; Koutsidis, G.; Mavroudis, N.; Trafalis, D.T.; Botaitis, S.; Franco, R.; Zoumpourlis, V.; Amery, T.; Galanis, A.; Pappa, A.; et al. The Role of Isothiocyanates as Cancer Chemo-Preventive, Chemo-Therapeutic and Anti-Melanoma Agents. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Morse, M.A.; Eklind, K.I.; Amin, S.G.; Hecht, S.S.; Chung, F.L. Effects of alkyl chain length on the inhibition of NNK-induced lung neoplasia in A/J mice by arylalkyl isothiocyanates. Carcinogenesis 1989, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lange, T.S.; Horan, T.C.; Kim, K.K.; Singh, A.P.; Vorsa, N.; Brard, L.; Moore, R.G.; Singh, R.K. Cytotoxic properties of Adamantyl isothiocyanate and potential in vivo metabolite adamantyl-N-acetylcystein in gynecological cancer cells. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2012, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xiao, D.; Singh, S.V. Phenethyl isothiocyanate inhibits angiogenesis in vitro and ex vivo. Cancer Res. 2007, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Han, K.W.W.; Po, W.W.; Sohn, W.D.; Kim, H.J. Benzyl Isothiocyanate Induces Apoptosis via Reactive Oxygen Species-Initiated Mitochondrial Dysfunction and DR4 and DR5 Death Receptor Activation in Gastric Adenocarcinoma Cells. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Satyan, K.S.; Swamy, N.; Dizon, D.S.; Singh, R.; Granai, C.O.; Brard, L. Phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) inhibits growth of ovarian cancer cells by inducing apoptosis: Role of caspase and MAPK activation. Gynecol. Oncol. 2006, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zhang, Y.; Yao, S.; Li, J. Vegetable-derived isothiocyanates: Anti-proliferative activity and mechanism of action. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2006, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zhang, R.; Loganathan, S.; Humphreys, I.; Srivastava, S.K. Benzyl isothiocyanate-induced DNA damage causes G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer cells. J. Nutr. 2006, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Cornet, C.; Calzolari, S.; Miñana-Prieto, R.; Dyballa, S.; van Doornmalen, E.; Rutjes, H.; Savy, T.; D’Amico, D.; Terriente, J. ZeGlobalTox: An Innovative Approach to Address Organ Drug Toxicity Using Zebrafish. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Kalueff, A.V.; Stewart, A.M.; Gerlai, R. Zebrafish as an emerging model for studying complex brain disorders. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2014, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Gerlai, R. High-throughput behavioral screens: The first step towards finding genes involved in vertebrate brain function using zebrafish. Molecules 2010, 15, 2609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Vaughan, M.; Egmond, R. The use of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryo for the acute toxicity testing of surfactants, as a possible alternative to the acute fish test. Altern. Lab. Anim. ATLA 2010, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Amatruda, J.F.; Shepard, J.L.; Stern, H.M.; Zon, L.I. Zebrafish as a cancer model system. Cancer Cell 2002, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Stern, H.M.; Zon, L.I. Cancer genetics and drug discovery in the zebrafish. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cassar, S.; Adatto, I.; Freeman, J.L.; Gamse, J.T.; Iturria, I.; Lawrence, C.; Muriana, A.; Peterson, R.T.; van Cruchten, S.; Zon, L.I. Use of Zebrafish in Drug Discovery Toxicology. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2020, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Haldi, M.; Ton, C.; Seng, W.L.; McGrath, P. Human melanoma cells transplanted into zebrafish proliferate, migrate, produce melanin, form masses and stimulate angiogenesis in zebrafish. Angiogenesis 2006, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Danilova, N.; Hohman, V.S.; Sacher, F.; Ota, T.; Willett, C.E.; Steiner, L.A. T cells and the thymus in developing zebrafish. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2004, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rao, C.V. Benzyl isothiocyanate: Double trouble for breast cancer cells. Cancer Prev. Res. 2013, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Tripathi, K.; Hussein, U.K.; Anupalli, R.; Barnett, R.; Bachaboina, L.; Scalici, J.; Rocconi, R.P.; Owen, L.B.; Piazza, G.A.; Palle, K. Allyl isothiocyanate induces replication-associated DNA damage response in NSCLC cells and sensitizes to ionizing radiation. Oncotarget 2015, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Rajan, T.S.; De Nicola, G.R.; Iori, R.; Rollin, P.; Bramanti, P.; Mazzon, E. Anticancer activity of glucomoringin isothiocyanate in human malignant astrocytoma cells. Fitoterapia 2016, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kang, L.; Ding, L.; Wang, Z.Y. Isothiocyanates repress estrogen receptor alpha expression in breast cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 2009, 21, 185–192. [Google Scholar]
  55. Kalkunte, S.; Swamy, N.; Dizon, D.S.; Brard, L. Benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC) induces apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells in vitro. J. Exp. Ther. Oncol. 2006, 5, 287–300. [Google Scholar]
  56. Liu, X.; Takano, C.; Shimizu, T.; Yokobe, S.; Abe-Kanoh, N.; Zhu, B.; Nakamura, T.; Munemasa, S.; Murata, Y.; Nakamura, Y. Inhibition of phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase ameliorates antiproliferation by benzyl isothiocyanate in human colon Cancer Cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, Y.; Dacosta, C.; Wang, W.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, M.; Bao, Y. Synergy between sulforaphane and selenium in protection against oxidative damage in colonic CCD841 cells. Nutr. Res. 2015, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Kaminski, B.M.; Weigert, A.; Brüne, B.; Schumacher, M.; Wenzel, U.; Steinhilber, D.; Stein, J.; Ulrich, S. Sulforaphane potentiates oxaliplatin-induced cell growth inhibition in colorectal cancer cells via induction of different modes of cell death. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2011, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Ma, Y.-S.; Lin, J.-J.; Lin, C.-C.; Lien, J.-C.; Peng, S.-F.; Fan, M.-J.; Hsu, F.-T.; Chung, J.-G. Benzyl isothiocyanate inhibits human brain glioblastoma multiforme GBM 8401 cell xenograft tumor in nude mice in vivo. Environ. Toxicol. 2018, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nyein, C.M.; Zhong, X.; Lu, J.; Luo, H.; Wang, J.; Rapposelli, S.; Li, M.; Ou-yang, Y.; Pi, R.; He, X. Synthesis and anti-glioblastoma effects of artemisinin-isothiocyanate derivatives. RSC Adv. 2018, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Hasegawa, T.; Nishino, H.; Iwashima, A. Isothiocyanates inhibit cell cycle progression of HeLa cells at G2/M phase. Anti-Cancer Drugs 1993, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Gupta, P.; Srivastava, S.K. Antitumor activity of phenethyl isothiocyanate in HER2-positive breast cancer models. BMC Med. 2012, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Sayed, A.; Bracci, M.; Ciarapica, V.; Malavolta, M.; Provinciali, M.; Pieragostini, E.; Gaetani, S.; Monaco, F.; Lucarini, G.; Rapisarda, V. Allyl Isothiocyanate Exhibits No Anticancer Activity in MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Cells 10 03219 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of molecular pathways targeted by isothiocyanates (ITCs) in cancer cells. ITCs exert their anti-tumor activities through various mechanisms, including (i) regulation of the epigenetic machinery, (ii) prevention of metastasis and angiogenesis, (iii) apoptosis via reactive oxygen species-initiated mitochondrial dysfunction (iv) inhibition of cell growth by causing cell cycle arrest and inducing cell death and (v) modulation of phase I and II enzymes [4]. The concentration in which ITCs present biological activity depends on chemical modifications and cell types.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of molecular pathways targeted by isothiocyanates (ITCs) in cancer cells. ITCs exert their anti-tumor activities through various mechanisms, including (i) regulation of the epigenetic machinery, (ii) prevention of metastasis and angiogenesis, (iii) apoptosis via reactive oxygen species-initiated mitochondrial dysfunction (iv) inhibition of cell growth by causing cell cycle arrest and inducing cell death and (v) modulation of phase I and II enzymes [4]. The concentration in which ITCs present biological activity depends on chemical modifications and cell types.
Cells 10 03219 g001
Cells 10 03219 g002 550
Figure 2. Microwave-assisted synthesis of LJ-NCS-1, LJ-NCS-4, and LJ-NCS-5.
Figure 2. Microwave-assisted synthesis of LJ-NCS-1, LJ-NCS-4, and LJ-NCS-5.
Cells 10 03219 g002
Cells 10 03219 g003 550
Figure 3. Microwave-assisted synthesis of LJ-NCS-3 using DMT/NMM/TsO−.
Figure 3. Microwave-assisted synthesis of LJ-NCS-3 using DMT/NMM/TsO−.
Cells 10 03219 g003
Cells 10 03219 g004 550
Figure 4. Synthesis of LJ-NCS-2 in Staudinger/aza–Wittig reaction.
Figure 4. Synthesis of LJ-NCS-2 in Staudinger/aza–Wittig reaction.
Cells 10 03219 g004
Cells 10 03219 g005 550
Figure 5. The effects of 24 h isothiocyanates treatment on morphology and mortality of 6 hpf zebrafish embryos at the experiment starting point. Representative images of embryos exposed to 1–10 µM of LJ-NCS-1–5 (n = 3 replicates, 50 embryos per replicate); bar scale = 450 µm. Percentage of viability-data are represented as mean ± SD.
Figure 5. The effects of 24 h isothiocyanates treatment on morphology and mortality of 6 hpf zebrafish embryos at the experiment starting point. Representative images of embryos exposed to 1–10 µM of LJ-NCS-1–5 (n = 3 replicates, 50 embryos per replicate); bar scale = 450 µm. Percentage of viability-data are represented as mean ± SD.
Cells 10 03219 g005
Cells 10 03219 g006 550
Figure 6. The effects of 48 h isothiocyanates treatment on morphology and mortality of 6 hpf zebrafish embryos at the experiment starting point. Representative images of embryos exposed to 1–10 µM of LJ-NCS-1–5 (n = 3 replicates, 50 embryos per replicate); bar scale = 450 µm Percentage of viability-data are represented as mean ± SD.
Figure 6. The effects of 48 h isothiocyanates treatment on morphology and mortality of 6 hpf zebrafish embryos at the experiment starting point. Representative images of embryos exposed to 1–10 µM of LJ-NCS-1–5 (n = 3 replicates, 50 embryos per replicate); bar scale = 450 µm Percentage of viability-data are represented as mean ± SD.
Cells 10 03219 g006
Cells 10 03219 g007 550
Figure 7. The effects of 72 h isothiocyanates treatment on morphology and mortality of 6 hpf zebrafish embryos at the experiment starting point. Representative images of embryos exposed to 1–10 µM of LJ-NCS-1–5 (n = 3 replicates, 50 embryos per replicate); bar scale = 950 µm. Percentage of viability-data are represented as mean ± SD; *** p <  0.001.
Figure 7. The effects of 72 h isothiocyanates treatment on morphology and mortality of 6 hpf zebrafish embryos at the experiment starting point. Representative images of embryos exposed to 1–10 µM of LJ-NCS-1–5 (n = 3 replicates, 50 embryos per replicate); bar scale = 950 µm. Percentage of viability-data are represented as mean ± SD; *** p <  0.001.
Cells 10 03219 g007
Cells 10 03219 g008 550
Figure 8. The effects of 24 h isothiocyanates treatment on morphology and mortality of 48 hpf zebrafish embryos at the experiment starting point. Representative images of embryos exposed to 1–3, of LJ-NCS-1–5 (n = 3 replicates, 50 embryos per replicate); bar scale = 950 µm. Percentage of viability-data are represented as mean ± SD; ** p  <  0.01 and *** p  <  0.001, **** p  <  0.0001.
Figure 8. The effects of 24 h isothiocyanates treatment on morphology and mortality of 48 hpf zebrafish embryos at the experiment starting point. Representative images of embryos exposed to 1–3, of LJ-NCS-1–5 (n = 3 replicates, 50 embryos per replicate); bar scale = 950 µm. Percentage of viability-data are represented as mean ± SD; ** p  <  0.01 and *** p  <  0.001, **** p  <  0.0001.
Cells 10 03219 g008
Cells 10 03219 g009 550
Figure 9. The effects of 48 h isothiocyanates treatment on morphology and mortality of 48 hpf zebrafish embryos at the experiment starting point. Representative images of embryos exposed to 1–3, of LJ-NCS-1–5 (n = 3 replicates, 50 embryos per replicate); bar scale = 950 µm. Percentage of viability-data are represented as mean ± SD; * p  <  0.05, ** p  <  0.01 and *** p  <  0.001.
Figure 9. The effects of 48 h isothiocyanates treatment on morphology and mortality of 48 hpf zebrafish embryos at the experiment starting point. Representative images of embryos exposed to 1–3, of LJ-NCS-1–5 (n = 3 replicates, 50 embryos per replicate); bar scale = 950 µm. Percentage of viability-data are represented as mean ± SD; * p  <  0.05, ** p  <  0.01 and *** p  <  0.001.
Cells 10 03219 g009
Cells 10 03219 g010 550
Figure 10. The effects of 72 h isothiocyanates treatment on morphology and mortality of 48 hpf zebrafish embryos at the experiment starting point. LJ-LNC-2 no effect on vascularization of zebrafish embryos. (A) Representative images of embryos exposed by 1–3, of LJ-NCS-1–5 (n = 3 replicates, 50 embryos per replicate); bar scale = 950 µm. Percentage of viability-data are represented as mean ± SD; ** p  <  0.01, *** p  <  0.001. (B) Representative picture (taken under fluorescence microscope) of blood vessels (green) of Tg(fli1:EGFP)y1 strain (48 hpf zebrafish embryos at the starting point) upon 3 µM LJ-NCS-2 treatment in 24, 48 and 72 h time points.
Figure 10. The effects of 72 h isothiocyanates treatment on morphology and mortality of 48 hpf zebrafish embryos at the experiment starting point. LJ-LNC-2 no effect on vascularization of zebrafish embryos. (A) Representative images of embryos exposed by 1–3, of LJ-NCS-1–5 (n = 3 replicates, 50 embryos per replicate); bar scale = 950 µm. Percentage of viability-data are represented as mean ± SD; ** p  <  0.01, *** p  <  0.001. (B) Representative picture (taken under fluorescence microscope) of blood vessels (green) of Tg(fli1:EGFP)y1 strain (48 hpf zebrafish embryos at the starting point) upon 3 µM LJ-NCS-2 treatment in 24, 48 and 72 h time points.
Cells 10 03219 g010
Cells 10 03219 g011 550
Figure 11. Phosphonate analog of sulforaphane (P-ITC) treatment inhibits tumor growth and fluorescence emitted from human glioma, cervical, and breast cancer cells grown in zebrafish embryos. The U87, HeLa and MDA-MB-231 cells were labeled with DiL (red fluorescence dye) and injected into the (A). hindbrain ventricle (U87), (B). yolk sac region (HeLa) and (C). in the caudal hematopoietic tissue (MDA-MB-231) of 48 h post-fertilization zebrafish embryos. After 24 h human cancer cell-positive embryos were selected and treated with 3 µM of P-ITC for 48 h. The images were taken under a fluorescence microscope and analyzed under a confocal microscope at the end of the experiment (lower panel of pictures; red–human fluorescence cells, green–blood vessels). The fluorescence emitted by the red tumor masses of each treatment group (n = 10) was measured by ImageJ and calculated in percentage. (D) The mass tumor growing of control and upon P-ITC treatment were measured at the beginning of the experiment (0 h; 24 h after human cells injection) and after 48 h of treatment (48 h). The presented percentage is the average tumor size after 48 h compared to starting 0 h point. Percentage of data are represented as mean ± SD; * p  <  0.05 and ** p  <  0.01.
Figure 11. Phosphonate analog of sulforaphane (P-ITC) treatment inhibits tumor growth and fluorescence emitted from human glioma, cervical, and breast cancer cells grown in zebrafish embryos. The U87, HeLa and MDA-MB-231 cells were labeled with DiL (red fluorescence dye) and injected into the (A). hindbrain ventricle (U87), (B). yolk sac region (HeLa) and (C). in the caudal hematopoietic tissue (MDA-MB-231) of 48 h post-fertilization zebrafish embryos. After 24 h human cancer cell-positive embryos were selected and treated with 3 µM of P-ITC for 48 h. The images were taken under a fluorescence microscope and analyzed under a confocal microscope at the end of the experiment (lower panel of pictures; red–human fluorescence cells, green–blood vessels). The fluorescence emitted by the red tumor masses of each treatment group (n = 10) was measured by ImageJ and calculated in percentage. (D) The mass tumor growing of control and upon P-ITC treatment were measured at the beginning of the experiment (0 h; 24 h after human cells injection) and after 48 h of treatment (48 h). The presented percentage is the average tumor size after 48 h compared to starting 0 h point. Percentage of data are represented as mean ± SD; * p  <  0.05 and ** p  <  0.01.
Cells 10 03219 g011
Table
Table 1. Isothiocyanates tested in the experiments.
Table 1. Isothiocyanates tested in the experiments.
SymbolFormulaInformation
LJ-NCS-1 Cells 10 03219 i001C9H9NSPhenethyl isothiocyanate; natural isothiocyanate with high biological activity [25]
LJ-NCS-2 Cells 10 03219 i002C11H22NO3PSPhosphonate analogs of sulforaphane; synthetic isothiocyanate with anti-tumorigenic/anti-proliferative activity in vitro and in vivo [8]
LJ-NCS-3 Cells 10 03219 i003C11H11NO2SA substance derived from 4-aminomethylbenzoic acid with hemostatic and antibacterial properties [26]
LJ-NCS-4 Cells 10 03219 i004C15H13NSA substance containing two aromatic rings with the potential to being anti- cancerogenic agent [27]
LJ-NCS-5 Cells 10 03219 i005C14H11NSA substance containing two aromatic rings with the potential to being anti- cancerogenic agent [27]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rudzinska-Radecka, M.; Janczewski, Ł.; Gajda, A.; Godlewska, M.; Chmielewska-Krzesinska, M.; Wasowicz, K.; Podlasz, P. The Anti-Tumoral Potential of Phosphonate Analog of Sulforaphane in Zebrafish Xenograft Model. Cells 2021, 10, 3219. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10113219

AMA Style

Rudzinska-Radecka M, Janczewski Ł, Gajda A, Godlewska M, Chmielewska-Krzesinska M, Wasowicz K, Podlasz P. The Anti-Tumoral Potential of Phosphonate Analog of Sulforaphane in Zebrafish Xenograft Model. Cells. 2021; 10(11):3219. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10113219

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rudzinska-Radecka, Magdalena, Łukasz Janczewski, Anna Gajda, Marlena Godlewska, Malgorzata Chmielewska-Krzesinska, Krzysztof Wasowicz, and Piotr Podlasz. 2021. "The Anti-Tumoral Potential of Phosphonate Analog of Sulforaphane in Zebrafish Xenograft Model" Cells 10, no. 11: 3219. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10113219

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop