Next Article in Journal
Angiotensin II-Induced Long Non-Coding RNA Alivec Regulates Chondrogenesis in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Cell Type-Specific Role of RNA Nuclease SMG6 in Neurogenesis
Previous Article in Journal
Integrated CGH/WES Analyses Advance Understanding of Aggressive Neuroblastoma Evolution: A Case Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Early Life Irradiation-Induced Hypoplasia and Impairment of Neurogenesis in the Dentate Gyrus and Adult Depression Are Mediated by MicroRNA- 34a-5p/T-Cell Intracytoplasmic Antigen-1 Pathway
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Emerging Roles of N6-Methyladenosine Modification in Neurodevelopment and Neurodegeneration

1
Department of Neurology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02908, USA
2
The Children’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310052, China
3
National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou 310052, China
4
The Institute of Translational Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China
5
Zhejiang University Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally.
Cells 2021, 10(10), 2694; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10102694
Submission received: 18 August 2021 / Revised: 26 September 2021 / Accepted: 29 September 2021 / Published: 9 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Induced Impairment of Neurogenesis and Brain Diseases)

Abstract

:
N6-methyladenosine (m6A), the most abundant modification in messenger RNAs (mRNAs), is deposited by methyltransferases (“writers”) Mettl3 and Mettl14 and erased by demethylases (“erasers”) Fto and Alkbh5. m6A can be recognized by m6A-binding proteins (“readers”), such as Yth domain family proteins (Ythdfs) and Yth domain-containing protein 1 (Ythdc1). Previous studies have indicated that m6A plays an essential function in various fundamental biological processes, including neurogenesis and neuronal development. Dysregulated m6A modification contributes to neurological disorders, including neurodegenerative diseases. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge about the roles of m6A machinery, including writers, erasers, and readers, in regulating gene expression and the function of m6A in neurodevelopment and neurodegeneration. We also discuss the perspectives for studying m6A methylation.

1. Introduction

Epigenetics refers to the heritable changes in gene expression and cell state caused by some specific mechanisms, aside from the occurrence of potential genetic sequences. More than 170 types of RNA modifications, including N6-methyladenosine (m6A), 5-methylcytidine (m5C), N1-methyladenosine (m1A), and N7-methylguanosine (m7G), have been identified in mammalian transcripts, and the most abundant internal RNA modification is N6-methyladenosine (m6A) [1,2]. m6A is installed by methyltransferases (writers), removed by demethylases (erasers), and recognized by m6A binding proteins (readers). Methyltransferase-like 3 (Mettl3) and methyltransferase-like 14 (Mettl14) form the core of the methyltransferase complex; AlkB homolog 5 protein (Alkbh5) and Fat mass and obesity-associated protein (Fto) are identified as demethylases; YTH domain family proteins (Ythdf1, Ythdf2, Ythdf3) and YTH domain-containing family protein 1 (Ythdc1) are essential reader proteins.
m6A modification is precisely catalyzed by a multi-subunit methyltransferase enzyme complex containing Mettl3, Mettl14, and other accessory components such as Wilms tumor 1-associated protein (Wtap), a mammalian splicing factor [3]. Mettl3 has catalytic activity, while Mettl14 acts as the RNA-binding platform and facilitates the recognition of Mettl3 [4]. Mettl3 and Mettl14 form heterodimers, which interact with Wtap. Wtap does not possess any methylation activity but interacts with Mettl3 and Mettl14 and promotes the recruitment of the Mettl3–Mettl14 complex to target transcripts [5]. The presence of m6A modification induces the preferential binding of certain proteins, i.e., m6A readers, Ythdf family proteins, and Ythdc1. In addition, m6A modification is reversible and can be removed by demethylases, including Fto and Alkbh5. Therefore, m6A machinery consists of multiple components that have diverse functions and make the field colorful (Figure 1).
m6A-specific methylated RNA immunoprecipitation (MeRIP) with next-generation sequencing data has revealed that m6A is non-randomly distributed in mRNAs but is especially enriched at the 5′ and 3′ UTRs [6,7]. m6A has been shown to impact RNA metabolism, including mRNA stability, translation, splicing, and localization; consequently, m6A regulates gene expression and involves diverse biological processes [2,8]. Present findings show that m6A modulates brain function [9,10] and regulates neurogenesis [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18], brain development [7,17,18,19], axon regeneration [20], and learning and memory [13,15]. The dysregulation of m6A has been found in a set of neurological disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease, Fragile X syndrome, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and intellectual disability [19,21,22,23,24]. In this review, we summarize the recent findings regarding the function and biological consequences of m6A modification in the neural system, from neural development to brain function and neurological disorders.

2. m6A and Neurogenesis

2.1. Writers

During embryonic neurogenesis, Mettl14 displays the highest expression in radial glia cells, and Mettl14 knockout (KO) in embryonic mouse brains extends the cell cycle of radial glia cells and induces aberrant cortical neurogenesis. Similar defects were induced by Mettl3 knockdown [11]. Mettl14 also regulates the cell cycle of human cortical neuronal progenitor cells [11]. The deletion of Mettl14 in embryonic neural stem cells (eNSCs) led to a remarkable decrease in proliferation and immature differentiation in vitro and in vivo [16]. In addition, Mettl3 knockdown reduced the proliferation and skewed the differentiation of adult neural stem cells (aNSCs) towards neuronal lineage, while the newborn neurons displayed immature morphology [12]. Transcriptome analysis revealed that the deficiency of either Mettl3 or Mettl14 affected the expression of transcripts related to neurogenesis, the cell cycle, and neuronal development [11,12,16]. Mettl3 conditional-knockout mice showed severe developmental defects of the cerebellum and cell death [17]. These results suggest an essential and conserved function of m6A in maintaining normal neurogenesis in the mammalian brain (Figure 2A).
m6A regulates gene expression not only through regulating RNA metabolism but also via modulating mRNAs encoding histone modifiers and transcription factors [25]. In mouse eNSCs, transcripts for histone acetyltransferases CBP (CREB binding protein) and p300 are m6A-modified [16]. In addition, transcripts for histone methyltransferase Ezh2 are also m6A-modified, and Mettl3 knockdown reduces the level of Ezh2 and consequent histone H3 trimethylation at lysine 27 (H3K27me3) in aNSCs [12]. Ectopic Ezh2 could rescue Mettl3-knockdown-induced deficits in aNSCs [12]. These findings suggest a crosstalk between RNA modification and transcriptional regulation and reveal a new layer of the mechanism regulating neurogenesis (Figure 2C).

2.2. Erasers

The fat mass and obesity-associated (Fto) gene was originally referred to as an obesity-risk gene and is the first identified m6A demethylase [26]. The loss-of-function mutation of the Fto gene caused growth retardation and severe neurodevelopmental disorders, including microcephaly, functional brain defects, and delayed psychomotor activity in humans [27,28,29]. Fto-deficient mice showed increased postnatal mortality, significant loss of adipose tissue and body mass, and disordered energy homeostasis [27,30]. The constitutive loss of Fto decreased brain size and body weight, impaired the pool of adult neural stem cells (aNSCs), and impaired the learning and memory of mice [15]. Specific ablation of Fto in aNSCs also inhibited neurogenesis and neuronal development [13]. In addition, specific deletion of Fto in lipids led to decreased neurogenesis and increased apoptosis [14]. These findings indicate that Fto regulates neurogenesis through diverse pathways, including affecting brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) signaling, the expression of platelet-derived growth factor receptor (Pdgfra) and suppressor of cytokine signaling 5 (Socs5), and adenosine levels [13,14,15].
Another m6A demethylase, Alkbh5, is primarily localized in the nuclear speckles. Alkbh5-mediated demethylation activity affects nuclear RNA export and RNA metabolism and, consequently, regulates gene expression. The cerebellum of Alkbh5-deficient mice did not show detectable changes in weight and morphology, but Alkbh5-KO mice were more sensitive to hypoxia and showed a significantly reduced size of whole brain and cerebellum compared to control littermates [18]. In addition, the number of proliferating cells was significantly increased, but mature neurons were reduced in the cerebellum of Alkbh5-deficient mice [18], which suggests that Alkbh5 deficiency affects the proliferation and differentiation of neuronal progenitor cells.

2.3. Readers

Ythdf1 is preferentially expressed in the hippocampus of mouse brains. Genetic deletion of Ythdf1 impaired the learning and memory of mice, whereas it did not affect gross hippocampal and cortical histology, neurogenesis, and motor abilities [31]. Electrophysiological data showed that Ythdf1-deficient neurons had reduced spine density and decreased amplitude and frequency of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents, which could be rescued by ectopic Ythdf1 [31]. This study further showed that Ythdf1 facilitates learning and memory by promoting the translation of target transcripts, including Gria1, Grin1, and Camk2a induced by neuronal stimulation.
m6A reader Ythdf2 is critical for embryonic development and has a lethal effect in mice [32]. Ythdf2-deficient mice embryos were alive at embryonic day 12.5, 14.5, and 18.5 but displayed abnormal brain development, including reduced cortical thickness and decreased proliferation of neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs) [32]. In addition, Ythdf2 deficiency skewed the differentiation of NSCs towards neuronal lineage, but newborn neurons had fewer and shorter neurites [32].
Fragile X mental retardation protein FMRP can bind mRNAs, and FMRP target mRNAs are significantly enriched for m6A modification [22]. The loss of the FMRP coding gene Fmr1 altered the m6A landscape and reduced the expression of FMRP-targeted long mRNAs in the cerebral cortex of adult mice. In addition, FMRP can interact with Ythdf2 [22]. This study provides a new layer of mechanism that specifies how FMRP regulates neuronal development and brain function.

3. m6A and Neural Development

m6A is abundant in the mammalian brain transcriptome, relative to other organs, and more than 25% of human transcripts are m6A-modified [6,7,33]. During embryonic and postnatal brain development, m6A displays temporal and spatial features, and specific m6A modification sites are present in transcripts across brain regions [6,11,21], which suggests an important role of m6A in neural development. Conditional deletion of Mettl14 led to smaller sizes of newborn pups, and all died before postnatal day 25 (P25) [11]. Mettl14-cKO pups showed enlarged ventricles, delayed depletion of PAX6+ radial glial cells, a type of neural stem cells, and prolonged cell-cycle progression [11]. Similar phenotypes were also observed in the brains of embryonic mice with Mettl3 knockdown [11]. m6A sequencing showed that transcripts with m6A modification were related to the cell cycle and neuronal differentiation [11]. In addition, during the postnatal cerebellum development, the global level of m6A decreases from P7 to P60, and m6A is developmentally/temporally modulated [18]. Specific m6A peaks at P7 were close to stop codon regions, whereas P60-specific m6A peaks were near start codons [18]. Mettl3 deficiency induces embryonic lethal effects, and the acute knockdown and specific ablation of Mettl3 both induced remarkable cortical and cerebellar defects, including a reduced number of Purkinje cells and the increased apoptosis of cerebellar granule cells [17,18].
Fto-deficient mice showed a decreased body weight compared to control mice, and the sizes of whole and distinct brain regions were also decreased remarkably [15]. In contrast to control mice, which exhibited locomotor activity induced by cocaine, Fto-deficient mice significantly lost their response to cocaine [34]. Mechanistically, Fto can also demethylase mRNAs involved in dopamine signaling, including Ped1b, Girk2, and Syn1; consequently, Fto can alter dopamine midbrain circuitry [34]. Alkbh5-knockout mice also showed drastically smaller cerebella and reduced mature neurons [18]. Collectively, these findings highlight the critical function of m6A in neural development.

4. m6A in Axonal and Synaptic Development

Acute knockdown of Mettl3 led to remarkable decreases of newborn neurons upon the differentiation of aNSCs, which displayed an immature morphology, with a reduced number of intersections and decreased total dendritic length [12]. In addition, Mettl3 knockdown also inhibited the morphological development of cultured hippocampal neurons [12]. Fto was enriched in the dendrites and synapses of neurons and can be locally translated into axons [35]. Treatment with a Fto activity inhibitor promoted m6A signals but inhibited axon elongation by regulating the axonal translation of Gap-43 [36]. In addition, transcripts for Roundabout (Robo) family member Robo3.1, an axon guidance receptor, were m6A-modified, and m6A reader Ythdf1 regulated axon guidance via the promotion of the translation of Robo3.1 [37]. Beyond affecting axon growth, m6A also regulates axon regeneration. Peripheral nerve injury induces a dynamic m6A landscape and enhances the expression of mRNAs modified by m6A, including Sox11, Atf3, and Gadd45a [20]. Mettl14 ablation in mature neurons promoted the translation in the adult dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and reduced the length of the longest neuronal process [20]. Similar effects were also observed in adult DRGs of Ythdf1-KO mice.
In addition, m6A modification that was identified in the synaptic transcriptome and in transcripts with m6A peaks in the stop codon but not in the start codon are associated with neurological dysfunction, including intellectual disability, microcephaly, and seizures [38]. m6A level was negatively correlated with transcript abundance in synaptosomal RNAs, suggesting the local degradation of m6A mRNA [38]. Interestingly, m6A peaks in the stop codon did not show a strong effect on the synaptic location of transcripts [38]. Furthermore, in contrast to hypomethylated transcripts, hypermethylated transcripts were highly related to synaptic development and neurological disorders, including intellectual disability, autism, and schizophrenia. [38].

5. m6A and Gliogenesis

Astrocytes and oligodendrocytes are two major macroglia cells in the brain that account for at least 50% of brain cells and are involved in diverse biological processes and brain function. In addition, to induce abnormal neurogenesis, acute knockdown of Mettl3 induces precocious astrocytes upon the differentiation of NSCs [12]. Constitutive deletion of Mettl14 can significantly reduce astrogenesis in embryonic mice brains [11]. Furthermore, Ythdf2-deficient NSCs only generate neuronal cells but not glial cells upon the differentiation [32]. Genetic ablation of Ythdf2 also increased the sensitivity of newborn neurons to reactive oxygen species stress [32]. Mechanistically, the expression of some transcripts related to neural development and differentiation, axon guidance, and synapse development (i.e., Nrp2, Nrxn3, Flrt2, Ptprd, Ddr2) was remarkably upregulated in Ythdf2-deficient NSCs [32]. One identified mechanism is that Ythdf2 deficiency represses m6A-modified mRNA clearance [32]. These findings indicate that m6A writers and reader(s) are essential for the proper temporal progression of neurogenesis and gliogenesis.
In addition to its important roles in astrocytes, differential m6A peaks were detected in transcripts during the differentiation of oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) to mature oligodendrocytes. Specific inactivation of Mettl14 in oligodendrocytes reduces the number of mature oligodendrocytes and, consequently, leads to hypomyelination [39]. Furthermore, Mettl14 deficiency inhibits oligodendrocyte differentiation, including morphological development, but does not affect OPCs. One potential mechanism is that the loss of Mettl14 induces the abnormal splicing of myriad RNA transcripts, including neurofascin 155 [39]. Proline-rich coiled-coil 2A (Prrc2a) is a novel m6A reader and is highly expressed in OPCs. Prrc2a deficiency reduces the proliferation of OPCs and decreases the expression of oligodendroglial lineage-related transcripts via the direct modulation of the half-life of Olig2 mRNA [40]. Consequently, Prrc2a-deficient mice exhibited hypomyelination and impaired locomotive and cognitive abilities [40].

6. m6A and Brain Function

Specific deletion of Mettl3 in CaMKIIα-expressing neurons impairs long-term potentiation, which enhances long-term memory consolidation via the modulation of the translation of immediate-early genes, such as Arc, Egr1, and c-Fos [41]. Genetic ablation of Mettl14 in dopamine D1 receptor (D1R)-expressing striatonigral neurons or dopamine D2 receptor (D2R)-expressing striatopallidal neurons also decreased the expression of neuron- and synapse-specific proteins, decreased the number of striatal cells double-labeled for mature neuronal marker NeuN and Mettl14, and increased neuronal excitability [42]. Behavioral tests show that Mettl14 deficiency in these two types of neurons impairs sensorimotor learning and reversal learning [42].
The constitutive or NSC-specific deletion of Fto not only causes aberrant neurogenesis, it also impairs the learning and memory abilities of mice [13,15]. In addition, fear condition training induced dynamic m6A modification, and the majority peaks were present in mRNAs. Fto-specific knockdown in the mouse medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) enhanced the cued fear memory [43]. Ythdf1-KO mice exhibit deficits in spatial learning and memory and contextual learning [31]. Ythdf1 deficiency also impaired basal synaptic transmission and long-term potentiation of mice, which can be rescued by ectopic Ythdf1 [31]. Ythdf1 modulates learning and memory formation mainly by promoting the translation of neuronal-stimulation-related transcripts. Heat shock stress can specifically increase m6A modification in 5′UTR and can alter the cellular localization and expression of Ythdf2, but not Fto, Mettl3, Mettl14, and Wtap [44]. The level of m6A modification in 5′UTR was correlated with the expression of a set of transcripts, especially the Hsp70 gene Hspa1a [44].

7. m6A and Neurological Disorders

Consistent with important functions in neural development [18,32], neurogenesis [11,12,15,16], learning and memory [12,13,15,42] and stress response [44,45], the present evidence also indicates that m6A modification is involved in several neurological disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and Parkinson’s disease (PD), schizophrenia, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) via the regulation of gene expression and RNA metabolism [10,11,46,47,48,49,50]. Next, we discuss the function of m6A modification in neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease.
A temporal feature of m6A modification has been revealed during postnatal brain development and aging [6,12]. In the brain of amyloid precursor protein (APP)/presenilin-1 (PS1) (APP/PS1) transgenic AD mouse models, m6A levels increased in the cortex and hippocampus, and the expressions of Mettl3 and Fto increased and decreased, respectively, compared with control mice [48]. Very recently, Shafik et al. found that m6A peaks decreased during the maturation stage of postnatal brain development (postnatal 2 weeks to 6 weeks), whereas these peaks increased during the process of aging (26 weeks and 52 weeks) [21]. In addition, this study also showed increased Fto expression and decreased Mettl3 expression. The differentially methylated transcripts were enriched in the signaling pathways related to Alzheimer’s disease, and differential m6A methylation is associated with decreased protein expression in an AD mouse model, which was further validated in a Drosophila transgenic AD model [21]. In agreement with this study, the Fto protein level increased in the brain tissues of transgenic AD mice, and Fto depletion did not affect the level of amyloid β 42 (Aβ42) but significantly increased the level of phosphorylated Tau in the neurons from an AD mice model [51]. They further found that Fto regulates Tau phosphorylation by activating mTOR signaling. Yoon et al. performed MeRIP, followed by next-generation sequencing with forebrain organoids, and the ontology analysis of human-specific m6A-targeted transcripts showed an enrichment in neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease [11]. Taken together, these findings suggest that m6A modification could play a pivotal function in the progression of AD (Figure 2C).
Acute knockdown of Mettl14 in substantia nigra reduced m6A levels and impaired motor function and locomotor activity [52]. Nuclear receptor-related protein 1 (Nurr1), pituitary homeobox 3 (Pitx3) and engrailed1 (En1) are related to tyrosine hydroxylase expression and dopaminergic function, and their expression was remarkably reduced by Mettl14 depletion [52]. The specific knockout of Fto in dopaminergic neurons impairs the dopamine neuron-dependent behavioral response by regulating dopamine transmission, which implies the important role of Fto-mediated m6A demethylation in regulating dopaminergic midbrain circuitry [34]. In a Parkinson’s disease (PD) rat model, the overall level of m6A in the striatum decreased, and the Fto level significantly increased [53]. Either ectopic Fto or treatment with m6A inhibitors reduces m6A levels and induces oxidative stress and apoptosis of dopamine neurons, partially by promoting the expression of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor 1 [53]. Consistently, Fto knockdown increases m6A levels and reduces apoptosis in vitro [53]. In addition, a large cohort study with 1647 Han Chinese individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD) has identified 214 rare variants in 10 genes with m6A modification; however, no significant association was observed between these variants and the risk for PD according to their analysis [54]. Therefore, the roles of m6A modification still need more comprehensive investigation (Figure 2C).

8. Conclusions and Perspectives

As the most abundant modification in mRNAs, previous studies have revealed the dynamic features of m6A modification and have uncovered its important function in a variety of biological processes and diseases. It seems that the more we explore m6A modification, the more complicated it becomes. First, m6A modification is reversible and includes multiple key “players”: writers, erasers, and readers. The interaction between these key players and other epigenetic modifications, such as histone modifiers, makes the field more complicated. Second, the complexity of m6A modification also lies in the fact that it is hard to define a promoting or repressing function of m6A modification in a set of diseases. The deficiency of m6A writers and erasers could show similar effects on the diseases but could not exhibit contrary effects as routinely thought. Third, m6A modification can regulate a defined biological process, i.e., the maintenance, renewal, and differentiation of neural stem cells by modulating diverse gene expression and signaling pathways. In addition, multiple players of m6A modification exhibit effects on the same biological process, such as neurogenesis. It is hard to distinguish whether the effect is independent of each other, and it remains unclear whether they crosstalk. Therefore, how m6A writers, erasers, and readers cooperate to regulate adult neurogenesis still needs more investigation.
Although dramatic progress has been made in understanding the function of m6A modification, future studies should devote more effort to uncovering the multi-faceted nature of the associated mechanisms. The interaction between m6A modification and histone modifiers suggests a colorful landscape wherein m6A modification interacts with other epigenetic machinery, i.e., DNA modifications and non-coding RNAs. In addition, considering a substantial enrichment of m6A in the 5′ and 3′ UTRs of transcripts, do multiple writers, erasers, and readers have binding specificity for distinct regions? Finally, establishing a more precise spatiotemporal landscape of m6A in the pathological context could be of clinical significance. With the technical advances of sequencing, we anticipate the identification of key m6A site(s) that can contribute to the diagnosis and treatment of specific diseases.

Author Contributions

All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFE0196600 to X.L.) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 92049108 to X.L.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, S.; Mason, C.E. The pivotal regulatory landscape of RNA modifications. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 2014, 15, 127–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wiener, D.; Schwartz, S. The epitranscriptome beyond m6A. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2021, 22, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Meng, T.-G.; Lu, X.; Guo, L.; Hou, G.-M.; Ma, X.-S.; Li, Q.-N.; Huang, L.; Fan, L.-H.; Zhao, Z.-H.; Ou, X.-H.; et al. Mettl14 is required for mouse postimplantation development by facilitating epiblast maturation. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 1179–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yu, J.; Shen, L.; Liu, Y.; Ming, H.; Zhu, X.; Chu, M.; Lin, J. The m6A methyltransferase METTL3 cooperates with demethylase ALKBH5 to regulate osteogenic differentiation through NF-κB signaling. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2020, 463, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ping, X.-L.; Sun, B.-F.; Wang, L.; Xiao, W.; Yang, X.; Wang, W.-J.; Adhikari, S.; Shi, Y.; Lv, Y.; Chen, Y.-S.; et al. Mammalian WTAP is a regulatory subunit of the RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase. Cell Res. 2014, 24, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Meyer, K.; Saletore, Y.; Zumbo, P.; Elemento, O.; Mason, C.E.; Jaffrey, S.R. Comprehensive analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3′ UTRs and near stop codons. Cell 2012, 149, 1635–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Dominissini, D.; Moshitch-Moshkovitz, S.; Schwartz, S.; Salmon-Divon, M.; Ungar, L.; Osenberg, S.; Cesarkas, K.; Jacob-Hirsch, J.; Amariglio, N.; Kupiec, M.; et al. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature 2012, 485, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gilbert, W.V.; Bell, T.A.; Schaening, C. Messenger RNA modifications: Form, distribution, and function. Science 2016, 352, 1408–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Nainar, S.; Marshall, P.; Tyler, C.R.; Spitale, R.C.; Bredy, T.W. Evolving insights into RNA modifications and their functional diversity in the brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2016, 19, 1292–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Livneh, I.; Moshitch-Moshkovitz, S.; Amariglio, N.; Rechavi, G.; Dominissini, D. The m6A epitranscriptome: Transcriptome plasticity in brain development and function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2020, 21, 36–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yoon, K.-J.; Ringeling, F.R.; Vissers, C.; Jacob, F.; Pokrass, M.; Jimenez-Cyrus, D.; Su, Y.; Kim, N.-S.; Zhu, Y.; Zheng, L.; et al. Temporal control of mammalian cortical neurogenesis by m6A methylation. Cell 2017, 171, 877–889.e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.-C.; Huang, C.; Shen, H.; Sun, B.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Yang, Y.-G.; Shu, Q.; Yang, Y.; et al. m6A regulates neurogenesis and neuronal development by modulating histone methyltransferase Ezh2. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2019, 17, 154–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cao, Y.; Zhuang, Y.; Chen, J.; Xu, W.; Shou, Y.; Huang, X.; Shu, Q.; Li, X. Dynamic effects of Fto in regulating the proliferation and differentiation of adult neural stem cells of mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2020, 29, 727–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gao, H.; Cheng, X.; Chen, J.; Ji, C.; Guo, H.; Qu, W.; Dong, X.; Chen, Y.; Ma, L.; Shu, Q.; et al. Fto-modulated lipid niche regulates adult neurogenesis through modulating adenosine metabolism. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2020, 29, 2775–2787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, L.; Zang, L.; Zhang, F.; Chen, J.; Shen, H.; Shu, L.; Liang, F.; Feng, C.; Chen, D.; Tao, H.; et al. Fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) protein regulates adult neurogenesis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2017, 26, 2398–2411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Yue, M.; Wang, J.; Kumar, S.; Wechsler-Reya, R.J.; Zhang, Z.; Ogawa, Y.; Kellis, M.; Duester, G.; et al. N(6)-methyladenosine RNA modification regulates embryonic neural stem cell self-renewal through histone modifications. Nat. Neurosci. 2018, 21, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Wang, C.-X.; Cui, G.-S.; Liu, X.; Xu, K.; Wang, M.; Zhang, X.-X.; Jiang, L.-Y.; Li, A.; Yang, Y.; Lai, W.-Y.; et al. METTL3-mediated m6A modification is required for cerebellar development. PLoS Biol. 2018, 16, e2004880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ma, C.; Chang, M.; Lv, H.; Zhang, Z.-W.; Zhang, W.; He, X.; Wu, G.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, D.; et al. RNA m6A methylation participates in regulation of postnatal development of the mouse cerebellum. Genome Biol. 2018, 19, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Chang, M.; Lv, H.; Zhang, W.; Ma, C.; He, X.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, Z.-W.; Zeng, Y.-X.; Song, S.; Niu, Y.; et al. Region-specific RNA m 6 A methylation represents a new layer of control in the gene regulatory network in the mouse brain. Open Biol. 2017, 7, 170166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Weng, Y.-L.; Wang, X.; An, R.; Cassin, J.; Vissers, C.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xu, T.; Wang, X.; Wong, S.Z.H.; et al. Epitranscriptomic m6A regulation of axon regeneration in the adult mammalian nervous system. Neuron 2018, 97, 313–325.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Shafik, A.M.; Zhang, F.; Guo, Z.; Dai, Q.; Pajdzik, K.; Li, Y.; Kang, Y.; Yao, B.; Wu, H.; He, C.; et al. N6-methyladenosine dynamics in neurodevelopment and aging, and its potential role in Alzheimer’s disease. Genome Biol. 2021, 22, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, F.; Kang, Y.; Wang, M.; Li, Y.; Xu, T.; Yang, W.; Song, H.; Wu, H.; Shu, Q.; Jin, P. Fragile X mental retardation protein modulates the stability of its m6A-marked messenger RNA targets. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2018, 27, 3936–3950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yang, C.; Hu, Y.; Zhou, B.; Bao, Y.; Li, Z.; Gong, C.; Wang, S.; Xiao, Y. The role of m6A modification in physiology and disease. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Choudhry, Z.; Sengupta, S.M.; Grizenko, N.; Thakur, G.A.; Fortier, M.-E.; Schmitz, N.; Joober, R. Association between obesity-related gene FTO and ADHD. Obesity 2013, 21, E738–E744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wei, J.; He, C. Chromatin and transcriptional regulation by reversible RNA methylation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2021, 70, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yang, S.; Wei, J.; Cui, Y.-H.; Park, G.; Shah, P.; Deng, Y.; Aplin, A.E.; Lu, Z.; Hwang, S.; He, C.; et al. m6A mRNA demethylase FTO regulates melanoma tumorigenicity and response to anti-PD-1 blockade. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fischer, J.; Koch, L.; Emmerling, C.; Vierkotten, J.; Peters, T.; Brüning, J.C.; Rüther, U. Inactivation of the Fto gene protects from obesity. Nature 2009, 458, 894–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Boissel, S.; Reish, O.; Proulx, K.; Kawagoe-Takaki, H.; Sedgwick, B.; Yeo, G.S.H.; Meyre, D.; Golzio, C.; Molinari, F.; Kadhom, N.; et al. Loss-of-function mutation in the dioxygenase-encoding FTO gene causes severe growth retardation and multiple malformations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 85, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Daoud, H.; Zhang, D.; McMurray, F.; Yu, A.; Luco, S.M.; Vanstone, J.; Jarinova, O.; Carson, N.; Wickens, J.; Shishodia, S.; et al. Identification of a pathogenic FTO mutation by next-generation sequencing in a newborn with growth retardation and developmental delay. J. Med. Genet. 2016, 53, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fu, Y.; Jia, G.; Pang, X.; Wang, R.N.; Wang, X.; Li, C.J.; Smemo, S.; Dai, Q.; Bailey, K.A.; Nobrega, M.A.; et al. FTO-mediated formation of N6-hydroxymethyladenosine and N6-formyladenosine in mammalian RNA. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Shi, H.; Zhang, X.; Weng, Y.-L.; Lu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Lu, Z.; Li, J.; Hao, P.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, F.; et al. m6A facilitates hippocampus-dependent learning and memory through YTHDF1. Nature 2018, 563, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, M.; Zhao, X.; Wang, W.; Shi, H.; Pan, Q.; Lu, Z.; Perez, S.P.; Suganthan, R.; He, C.; Bjørås, M.; et al. Ythdf2-mediated m6A mRNA clearance modulates neural development in mice. Genome Biol. 2018, 19, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Yoon, K.-J.; Ming, G.-L.; Song, H. Epitranscriptomes in the adult mammalian brain: Dynamic Changes regulate behavior. Neuron 2018, 99, 243–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Hess, M.; Hess, S.; Meyer, K.; Verhagen, L.A.W.; Koch, L.; Brönneke, H.S.; Dietrich, M.; Jordan, S.D.; Saletore, Y.; Elemento, O.; et al. The fat mass and obesity associated gene (Fto) regulates activity of the dopaminergic midbrain circuitry. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16, 1042–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Walters, B.; Mercaldo, V.; Gillon, C.; Yip, M.; Neve, R.L.; Boyce, F.M.; Frankland, P.W.; Josselyn, S. The role of the RNA demethylase FTO (fat mass and obesity-associated) and mRNA methylation in hippocampal memory formation. Neuropsychopharmacology 2017, 42, 1502–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Yu, J.; Chen, M.; Huang, H.; Zhu, J.; Song, H.; Zhu, J.; Park, J.; Ji, S.-J. Dynamic m6A modification regulates local translation of mRNA in axons. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 1412–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Zhuang, M.; Li, X.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, J.; Niu, F.; Liang, F.; Chen, M.; Li, D.; Han, P.; Ji, S.-J. The m6A reader YTHDF1 regulates axon guidance through translational control of Robo3.1 expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 4765–4777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Merkurjev, D.; Hong, W.-T.; Iida, K.; Oomoto, I.; Goldie, B.J.; Yamaguti, H.; Ohara, T.; Kawaguchi, S.-Y.; Hirano, T.; Martin, K.C.; et al. Synaptic N6-methyladenosine (m6A) epitranscriptome reveals functional partitioning of localized transcripts. Nat. Neurosci. 2018, 21, 1004–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Xu, H.; Dzhashiashvili, Y.; Shah, A.; Kunjamma, R.B.; Weng, Y.-L.; Elbaz, B.; Fei, Q.; Jones, J.S.; Li, Y.I.; Zhuang, X.; et al. m6A mRNA methylation is essential for oligodendrocyte maturation and CNS myelination. Neuron 2019, 105, 293–309.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wu, R.; Li, A.; Sun, B.; Sun, J.-G.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, T.; Chen, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, Q.; et al. A novel m6A reader Prrc2a controls oligodendroglial specification and myelination. Cell Res. 2018, 29, 23–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zhang, Z.; Wang, M.; Xie, D.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Y.; Ma, D.; Li, W.; Zhou, Q.; Yang, Y.-G.; et al. METTL3-mediated N6-methyladenosine mRNA modification enhances long-term memory consolidation. Cell Res. 2018, 28, 1050–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Koranda, J.L.; Dore, L.; Shi, H.; Patel, M.; Vaasjo, L.O.; Rao, M.N.; Chen, K.; Lu, Z.; Yi, Y.; Chi, W.; et al. Mettl14 is essential for epitranscriptomic regulation of striatal function and learning. Neuron 2018, 99, 283–292.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Widagdo, J.; Zhao, Q.-Y.; Kempen, M.-J.; Tan, M.C.; Ratnu, V.S.; Wei, W.; Leighton, L.; Spadaro, P.A.; Edson, J.; Anggono, V.; et al. Experience-dependent accumulation of N 6 -methyladenosine in the prefrontal cortex is associated with memory processes in mice. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 6771–6777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Zhou, J.; Wan, J.; Gao, X.; Zhang, X.; Jaffrey, S.; Qian, S.-B. Dynamic m6A mRNA methylation directs translational control of heat shock response. Nature 2015, 526, 591–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Engel, M.; Eggert, C.; Kaplick, P.M.; Eder, M.; Röh, S.; Tietze, L.; Namendorf, C.; Arloth, J.; Weber, P.; Rex-Haffner, M.; et al. The role of m6A/m-RNA methylation in stress response regulation. Neuron 2018, 99, 389–403.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhao, B.; Roundtree, I.A.; He, C. Post-transcriptional gene regulation by mRNA modifications. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2016, 18, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Du, K.; Zhang, L.; Lee, T.; Sun, T. m6A RNA methylation controls neural development and is involved in human diseases. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018, 56, 1596–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Han, M.; Liu, Z.; Xu, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, D.; Li, F.; Wang, Y.; Bi, J. Abnormality of m6A mRNA methylation is involved in Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Engel, M.; Chen, A. The emerging role of mRNA methylation in normal and pathological behavior. Genes Brain Behav. 2017, 17, e12428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Yue, Y.; Liu, J.; He, C. RNA N6-methyladenosine methylation in post-transcriptional gene expression regulation. Genes Dev. 2015, 29, 1343–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Li, H.; Ren, Y.; Mao, K.; Hua, F.; Yang, Y.; Wei, N.; Yue, C.; Li, D.; Zhang, H. FTO is involved in Alzheimer’s disease by targeting TSC1-mTOR-Tau signaling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 498, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Teng, Y.; Liu, Z.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y.; Geng, F.; Le, W.; Jiang, H.; Yang, L. Conditional deficiency of m6A methyltransferase Mettl14 in substantia nigra alters dopaminergic neuron function. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2021, 25, 8567–8572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chen, X.; Yu, C.; Guo, M.; Zheng, X.; Ali, S.; Huang, H.; Zhang, L.; Wang, S.; Huang, Y.; Qie, S.; et al. Down-regulation of m6A mRNA methylation is involved in dopaminergic neuronal death. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2019, 10, 2355–2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Qin, L.; Min, S.; Shu, L.; Pan, H.; Zhong, J.; Guo, J.; Sun, Q.; Yan, X.; Chen, C.; Tang, B.; et al. Genetic analysis of N6-methyladenosine modification genes in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2020, 93, 143.e9–143.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of m6A modification. m6A methylation is catalyzed by the methyltransferase complex containing Mettl3, Mettl14, and an adaptor protein, such as WTAP. Fto and Alkbh5 can function as demethylases, and Yth family proteins can recognize m6A sites. m6A modification in mammals is presented on the consensus sequence DRACH (D = A/G/U, R = A/G, H = A/C/U). Reversible m6A modification plays important roles in regulating RNA metabolism, including RNA splicing, nuclear export, translation, and degradation in the specific context. Mettl3, methyltransferase-like 3; Mettl14, methyltransferase-like 14; WTAP, Wilms tumor 1-associating protein; Fto, fat mass and obesity-associated protein; ALKBH5, AlkB homolog 5.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of m6A modification. m6A methylation is catalyzed by the methyltransferase complex containing Mettl3, Mettl14, and an adaptor protein, such as WTAP. Fto and Alkbh5 can function as demethylases, and Yth family proteins can recognize m6A sites. m6A modification in mammals is presented on the consensus sequence DRACH (D = A/G/U, R = A/G, H = A/C/U). Reversible m6A modification plays important roles in regulating RNA metabolism, including RNA splicing, nuclear export, translation, and degradation in the specific context. Mettl3, methyltransferase-like 3; Mettl14, methyltransferase-like 14; WTAP, Wilms tumor 1-associating protein; Fto, fat mass and obesity-associated protein; ALKBH5, AlkB homolog 5.
Cells 10 02694 g001
Figure 2. m6A modification in neural development and neurological disorders. (A). Schematic representation of neurogenesis. Neural stem cells have the capability to self-renew and differentiate into neural cells, such as neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes. (B). Loss of m6A modification affects histone modifications, including H3K27me3 and H3K27ac, which regulate the expression of genes related to the proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells. (C). The modulation of m6A modification machinery contributes to neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease, through the regulation of multiple pathways, such as mTOR. AD, Alzheimer’s disease; PD, Parkinson’s disease; TSC1, tuberous sclerosis 1; TSC2, tuberous sclerosis 2.
Figure 2. m6A modification in neural development and neurological disorders. (A). Schematic representation of neurogenesis. Neural stem cells have the capability to self-renew and differentiate into neural cells, such as neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes. (B). Loss of m6A modification affects histone modifications, including H3K27me3 and H3K27ac, which regulate the expression of genes related to the proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells. (C). The modulation of m6A modification machinery contributes to neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease, through the regulation of multiple pathways, such as mTOR. AD, Alzheimer’s disease; PD, Parkinson’s disease; TSC1, tuberous sclerosis 1; TSC2, tuberous sclerosis 2.
Cells 10 02694 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shu, L.; Huang, X.; Cheng, X.; Li, X. Emerging Roles of N6-Methyladenosine Modification in Neurodevelopment and Neurodegeneration. Cells 2021, 10, 2694. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10102694

AMA Style

Shu L, Huang X, Cheng X, Li X. Emerging Roles of N6-Methyladenosine Modification in Neurodevelopment and Neurodegeneration. Cells. 2021; 10(10):2694. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10102694

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shu, Liqi, Xiaoli Huang, Xuejun Cheng, and Xuekun Li. 2021. "Emerging Roles of N6-Methyladenosine Modification in Neurodevelopment and Neurodegeneration" Cells 10, no. 10: 2694. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10102694

APA Style

Shu, L., Huang, X., Cheng, X., & Li, X. (2021). Emerging Roles of N6-Methyladenosine Modification in Neurodevelopment and Neurodegeneration. Cells, 10(10), 2694. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10102694

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop