Next Article in Journal
Response of Boll Development to Macronutrients Application in Different Cotton Genotypes
Next Article in Special Issue
Modelling Crop Transpiration in Greenhouses: Different Models for Different Applications
Previous Article in Journal
AquaCrop Calibration and Validation for Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) under Different Agronomic Managements
Previous Article in Special Issue
Radiometric Method for Determining Canopy Stomatal Conductance in Controlled Environments
Article

Grape Rootstock Response to Salinity, Water and Combined Salinity and Water Stresses

USDA-ARS, US Salinity Laboratory, Riverside, CA 92507, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2019, 9(6), 321; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9060321
Received: 17 May 2019 / Revised: 13 June 2019 / Accepted: 13 June 2019 / Published: 18 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Crop Evapotranspiration)
Diminishing availability of non-saline water in arid and semiarid regions is of concern to all irrigated agricultural producers, including wine and grape producers. Grapes are not a salt tolerant crop and producers often face the choice of either limiting fresh water application, using alternative saline waters or a combination of both. We examined the salt tolerance and effect of restricted water application on three purported salt tolerant rootstocks grafted to Cabernet Sauvignon scion in a 4-year replicated field experiment. ANOVA indicated significant effects of salinity water stress and rootstock on fruit yields. The 140 Ruggeri scion was the top producer across all treatments including control, followed by Salt Creek, with St. George significantly less productive than 140 Ruggeri across all treatments. In terms of salt tolerance, Salt Creek and 140 Ruggeri were not statistically different but St. George was significantly less tolerant than Salt Creek. In terms of drought tolerance (relative yield), there were no statistical differences among rootstocks. Soil salinity profiles and soil moisture sensors indicated reduced water consumption under high salinity, thus no matric stress under 60% of optimal water application when high salt stress was present. The multiplicative stress model where salt and water stress are individually evaluated did not satisfactorily predict yield under combined salinity and reduced water application, likely due to decreased water consumption under saline conditions. Short term (one year) experiments underestimate salt damage to grape vines as salt tolerance decreased over the 4-year experiment. View Full-Text
Keywords: Salinity; grapes; abiotic stress; wine; rootstocks Salinity; grapes; abiotic stress; wine; rootstocks
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Suarez, D.L.; Celis, N.; Anderson, R.G.; Sandhu, D. Grape Rootstock Response to Salinity, Water and Combined Salinity and Water Stresses. Agronomy 2019, 9, 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9060321

AMA Style

Suarez DL, Celis N, Anderson RG, Sandhu D. Grape Rootstock Response to Salinity, Water and Combined Salinity and Water Stresses. Agronomy. 2019; 9(6):321. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9060321

Chicago/Turabian Style

Suarez, Donald L., Nydia Celis, Ray G. Anderson, and Devinder Sandhu. 2019. "Grape Rootstock Response to Salinity, Water and Combined Salinity and Water Stresses" Agronomy 9, no. 6: 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9060321

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop