Diallel Analysis for Morphological and Biochemical Traits in Tomato Cultivated under the Influence of Tomato Leaf Curl Virus
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Material and Artificial Screening
2.2. Characterization and Data Analysis
2.3. Bayesian Model-Based Analysis of Total Yield
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Artificial Screening
3.2. Variation in Parents and Hybrids
3.3. Bayesian Model-Based Estimates and Predictions of Total Yield
3.4. GCA and SCA Estimates
3.5. Correlations
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kalloo, G. Genetic Improvement of Tomato; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2012; ISBN 978-3-642-84275-7. [Google Scholar]
- Víquez-Zamora, M.; Vosman, B.; van de Geest, H.; Bovy, A.; Visser, R.G.; Finkers, R.; van Heusden, A.W. Tomato breeding in the genomics era: Insights from a SNP array. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hossain, M.A.; Wani, S.H.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Burritt, D.J.; Tran, L.-S.P. Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants, Vol 1: Physiology and Biochemistry; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2016; ISBN 978-3-319-28899-4. [Google Scholar]
- Jacobsen, S.-E.; Jensen, C.R.; Liu, F. Improving crop production in the arid Mediterranean climate. Field Crop. Res. 2012, 128, 34–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jensen, C.R.; Battilani, A.; Plauborg, F.; Psarras, G.; Chartzoulakis, K.; Janowiak, F.; Stikic, R.; Jovanovic, Z.; Li, G.; Qi, X.; et al. Deficit irrigation based on drought tolerance and root signalling in potatoes and tomatoes. Agric. Water Manag. 2010, 98, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, S.K.; Thind, T.S. Disease Problems in Vegetable Production; Scientific Publishers: New Delhi, India, 2012; ISBN 978-93-86347-51-0. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, C.; Sun, X.; Taylor, A.; Jiao, C.; Xu, Y.; Cai, X.; Wang, X.; Ge, C.; Pan, G.; Wang, Q.; et al. Diversity, distribution, and evolution of tomato viruses in China uncovered by small RNA sequencing. J. Virol. 2017, 91, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Picó, B.; Díez, M.J.; Nuez, F. Viral diseases causing the greatest economic losses to the tomato crop. II. The tomato yellow leaf curl virus—A review. Sci. Hortic. 1996, 67, 151–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saxena, S.; Tiwari, A.K. Begomoviruses: Occurrence and Management in Asia and Africa; Springer: Singapore, 2017; ISBN 978-981-10-5984-1. [Google Scholar]
- Gaikwad, K.A.; Cheema, D.S.; Sharma, A.; Dhaliwal, M.S. Reactioofelitetomato (Solanumly copersicum L.) germplasm against tomato leaf curl virus disease. Acta. Hortic. 2011, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moriones, E.; Praveen, S.; Chakraborty, S. Tomato leaf curl new delhi virus: An emerging virus complex threatening vegetable and fiber crops. Viruses 2017, 9, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sharma, N.; Prasad, M. An insight into plant–Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus interaction. Nucleus 2017, 60, 335–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Picó, B.; Díez, M.J.; Nuez, F. Evaluation of whitefly-mediated inoculation techniques to screen lycopersicon esculentum and wild relatives for resistance to tomato yellow leaf curl virus. Euphytica 1998, 101, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, R.K.; Rai, N.; Singh, M.; Saha, S.; Singh, S.N. Detection of tomato leaf curl virus resistance and inheritance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J. Agric. Sci. 2015, 153, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Díez, M.J.; Nuez, F. Tomato. In Vegetables II; Handbook of Plant Breeding; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 249–323. ISBN 978-0-387-74108-6. [Google Scholar]
- Kaushik, P.; Andújar, I.; Vilanova, S.; Plazas, M.; Gramazio, P.; Herraiz, F.J.; Brar, N.S.; Prohens, J. Breeding vegetables with increased content in bioactive phenolic acids. Molecules 2015, 20, 18464–18481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arias, R.; Lee, T.-C.; Logendra, L.; Janes, H. Correlation of lycopene measured by HPLC with the L*, a*, b* color readings of a hydroponic tomato and the relationship of maturity with color and lycopene content. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 1697–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Palozza, P.; Simone, R.E.; Catalano, A.; Mele, M.C. Tomato lycopene and lung cancer prevention: From experimental to human studies. Cancers 2011, 3, 2333–2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wei, M.Y.; Giovannucci, E.L. Lycopene, Tomato Products, and Prostate Cancer Incidence: A Review and Reassessment in the PSA Screening Era. Available online: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jo/2012/271063/ (accessed on 1 April 2012).
- Des Marais, D.L.; Hernandez, K.M.; Juenger, T.E. Genotype-by-environment interaction and plasticity: Exploring genomic responses of plants to the abiotic environment. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2013, 44, 5–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beckles, D.M. Factors affecting the postharvest soluble solids and sugar content of tomato (Solanumly copersicum L.) fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2012, 63, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acharya, B.; Dutta, S.; Dutta, S.; Chattopadhyay, A. Breeding tomato for simultaneous improvement of processing quality, fruit yield, and dual disease tolerance. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 2018, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panthee, D.R.; Perkins-Veazie, P.; Anderson, C.; Ibrahem, R. Diallel analysis for lycopene content in the hybrids derived from different colored parents in tomato. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shattuck, V.I.; Christie, B.; Corso, C. Principles for Griffing’s combining ability analysis. Genetica 1993, 90, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Griffing, B. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1956, 9, 463–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanson, P.M.; Licardo, O.; Hanudin; Wang, J.-F.; Chen, J. Diallel analysis of bacterial wilt resistance in tomato derived from different sources. Plant Dis. 1998, 82, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaushik, P.; Plazas, M.; Prohens, J.; Vilanova, S.; Gramazio, P. Diallel genetic analysis for multiple traits in eggplant and assessment of genetic distances for predicting hybrids performance. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0199943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Do Rêgo, E.R.; do Rêgo, M.M.; Finger, F.L.; Cruz, C.D.; Casali, V.W.D. A diallel study of yield components and fruit quality in chilli pepper (Capsicum baccatum). Euphytica 2009, 168, 275–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taggar, G.K.; Gill, R.S. Preference of whitefly, Bemisiatabaci, towards black gram genotypes: Role of morphological leaf characteristics. Phytoparasitica 2012, 40, 461–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toscano, L.C.; Boiça, A.L., Jr.; Leal, A.; Maruyama, W.I. Nonpreference of whitefly for oviposition in tomato genotypes. Sci. Agr. 2002, 59, 677–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, H.X.; Matheson, A.C. Analysis of half-diallel mating design with missing crosses: Theory and SAS program for testing and estimating GCA and SCA fixed effects. Silvae Genet. 2000, 49, 130–137. [Google Scholar]
- Xiang, B.; Li, B. A new mixed analytical method for genetic analysis of diallel data. Can. J. For. Res. 2001, 31, 2252–2259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenberg, A.J.; Hackett, S.R.; Harshman, L.G.; Clark, A.G. A hierarchical bayesian model for a novel sparse partial diallel crossing design. Genetics 2010, 185, 361–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lenarcic, A.B.; Svenson, K.L.; Churchill, G.A.; Valdar, W. A general bayesian approach to analyzing diallel crosses of inbred strains. Genetics 2012, 190, 413–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Turner, S.D.; Maurizio, P.L.; Valdar, W.; Yandell, B.S.; Simon, P.W. Dissecting the genetic architecture of shoot growth in carrot (Daucus carota L.) using a diallel mating design. Genes Genom. Genet. 2018, 8, 411–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Banerjee, M.K. Kalloo Inheritance of tomato leaf curl virus resistance in Lycopersicon hirsutum f. Glabratum. Euphytica 1987, 36, 581–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, O.P.; Mahajan, R.; Singh, S. Field reaction of some root-knot resistant tomato varieties and hybrids to tobacco mosaic and tobacco leaf curl viruses. Indian J. Mycol. Plant Pathol. 1984, 14, 148–150. [Google Scholar]
- Maria Alda, L.; Gogoaşă, I.; Bordean, D.-M.; Gergen, I.; Alda, S.; Moldovan, C.; Niţă, L. Lycopene content of tomatoes and tomato products. J. Agroaliment. Proc. Technol. 2009, 15, 540–542. [Google Scholar]
- Rodríguez, F.; Alvarado, G.; Pacheco, Á.; Crossa, J.; Burgueño, J. AGD-R (Analysis of Genetic Designs with R for Windows) Version 4.0. Available online: https://data.cimmyt.org/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=hdl:11529/10202 (accessed on 11 June 2015).
- Wei, T.; Simko, V.; Levy, M.; Xie, Y.; Jin, Y.; Zemla, J. Corrplot: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix. Available online: https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot (accessed on 17 October 2017).
- Peterson, B.G.; Carl, P.; Boudt, K.; Bennett, R.; Ulrich, J.; Zivot, E.; Cornilly, D.; Hung, E.; Lestel, M.; Balkissoon, K.; et al. Performance Analytics: Econometric Tools for Performance and Risk Analysis. Available online: https://github.com/braverock/PerformanceAnalytics (accessed on 2 March 2018).
- Lapidot, M.; Ben-Joseph, R.; Cohen, L.; Machbash, Z.; Levy, D. Development of a scale for evaluation of tomato yellow leaf curl virus resistance level in tomato plants. Phytopathology 2006, 96, 1404–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ambawat, S.; Sharma, P.; Yadav, N.R.; Yadav, R.C. MYB transcription factor genes as regulators for plant responses: An overview. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2013, 19, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gaikwad, K.A.; Sharma, A.; Cheema, D.S. Molecular detection and characterization of leaf curl virus infecting tomato in punjab, India. Acta. Hortic. 2011, 153–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lapidot, M.; Friedmann, M.; Lachman, O.; Yehezkel, A.; Nahon, S.; Cohen, S.; Pilowsky, M. Comparison of resistance level to tomato yellow leaf curl virus among commercial cultivars and breeding lines. Plant Dis. 1997, 81, 1425–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-De-Castro, A.; Campos, G.; Julián, O.; Dueñas, F.; Álvarez, M.; Martínez-Zubiaur, Y.; Díez, M.J. Evaluation under diverse conditions of a differential host reaction scale to tomato yellow leaf curl virus in tomato. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2017, 56, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fereres, A.; Peñaflor, M.F.G.V.; Favaro, C.F.; Azevedo, K.E.X.; Landi, C.H.; Maluta, N.K.P.; Bento, J.M.S.; Lopes, J.R.S. Tomato infection by whitefly-transmitted circulative and non-circulative viruses induce contrasting changes in plant volatiles and vector behaviour. Viruses 2016, 8, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Channarayappa, C.; Shivashankar, G.; Muniyappa, V.; Frist, R.H. Resistance of lycopersicon species to bemisiatabaci, a tomato leaf curl virus vector. Can. J. Bot. 1992, 70, 2184–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farzane, A.; Nemati, H.; Aroiee, H.; Mirshamsi, A.; Vahdati, N. The estimate of combining ability and heterosis for yield and yield components in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). J. Biol. Environ. Sci. 2012, 6, 129–134. [Google Scholar]
- Shalaby, T.A. Mode of gene action, heterosis and inbreeding depression for yield and its components in tomato (Solanumly copersicum L.). Sci. Hortic. 2013, 164, 540–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shankar, A.; Reddy, R.V.S.K.; Sujatha, M.; Pratap, M. Combining ability and gene action studies for yield and yield contributing traits in tomato (Solanumly copersicum L.). Helix 2012, 6, 431–435. [Google Scholar]
- Govindarasu, P.; Muthukrishnan, C.R.; Irulappan, I. Combining-ability for yield and its components in tomato. Sci. Hortic. 1981, 14, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dufera, J.T.; Mohammed, W.; Hussien, S.; Kumar, V. Genetic analysis for fruit yield and quality attributes in some processing and fresh market tomato genotypes. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 2018, 24, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, R.; Srivastava, K.; Singh, N.P.; Vasistha, N.K.; Singh, R.K.; Singh, M.K. Combining ability analysis for yield and quality traits in tomato (Solanumly copersicum L.). J. Agric. Sci. 2013, 5, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bleeker, P.M.; Diergaarde, P.J.; Ament, K.; Guerra, J.; Weidner, M.; Schütz, S.; de Both, M.T.J.; Haring, M.A.; Schuurink, R.C. The role of specific tomato volatiles in tomato-whitefly interaction. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151, 925–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maluta, N.K.P.; Fereres, A.; Lopes, J.R.S. Settling preferences of the whitefly vector Bemisiatabaci on infected plants varies with virus family and transmission mode. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2017, 165, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crowley, J.J.; Kim, Y.; Lenarcic, A.B.; Quackenbush, C.R.; Barrick, C.J.; Adkins, D.E.; Shaw, G.S.; Miller, D.R.; de Villena, F.P.-M.; Sullivan, P.F.; et al. Genetics of adverse reactions to haloperidol in a mouse diallel: A drug-placebo experiment and Bayesian causal analysis. Genetics 2014, 196, 321–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lunt, K.A.; Roux, C.Z.; Blokpoel, I.; Booyse, M. Inheritance of flavour in six tomato (Lycopersicone sculentum) varieties. S. Afr. J. Plant Soil 1999, 16, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandiarana, N.; Chattopadhyay, A.; Seth, T.; Shende, V.D.; Dutta, S.; Hazra, P. Heterobeltiosis, potence ratio and genetic control of processing quality and disease severity traits in tomato. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 2015, 43, 282–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souza, L.M.D.; Paterniani, M.E.A.; Melo, P.C.T.D.; Melo, A.M.D. Diallel cross among fresh market tomato inbreeding lines. Hortic. Bras. 2012, 30, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kumar, D.; Kumar, R.; Kumar, S.; Bhardwaj, M.L.; Thakur, M.C.; Kumar, R.; Thakur, K.S.; Dogra, B.S.; Vikram, A.; Thakur, A.; et al. Genetic variability, correlation and path coefficient analysis in tomato. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 2013, 19, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Souza, L.M.; Melo, P.C.T.; Luders, R.R.; Melo, A.M. Correlations between yield and fruit quality characteristics of fresh market tomatoes. Hortic. Bras. 2012, 30, 627–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rao, E.S.; Kadirvel, P.; Symonds, R.C.; Ebert, A.W. Relationship between survival and yield related traits in Solanum pimpinellifolium under salt stress. Euphytica 2013, 190, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6 | P7 | P8 | P9 | P10 | P11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | H1 | H2 | H3 | H4 | H5 | H6 | H7 | H8 | H9 | H10 |
P2 | H11 | H12 | H13 | H14 | H15 | H16 | H17 | H18 | H19 | |
P3 | H20 | H21 | H22 | H23 | H24 | H25 | H26 | H27 | ||
P4 | H28 | H29 | H30 | H31 | H32 | H33 | H34 | |||
P5 | H35 | H36 | H37 | H38 | H39 | H40 | ||||
P6 | H41 | H42 | H43 | H44 | H45 | |||||
P7 | H46 | H47 | H48 | H49 | ||||||
P8 | H50 | H51 | H52 | |||||||
P9 | H53 | H54 | ||||||||
P10 | H55 | |||||||||
P11 |
Source of Variation | Genotypes a | GCA a | SCA a | Error | Baker Ratio | h2 | H2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degree of freedom | 65 | 10 | 55 | 65 | |||
Dry matter | 0.38 *** | 0.66 *** | 0.33 *** | 0.11 | 0.80 | 0.22 | 0.95 |
Equatorial diameter | 0.68 *** | 0.87 *** | 0.65 *** | 0.01 | 0.73 | 0.17 | 0.97 |
Fruit weight | 964.97 *** | 2755.90 *** | 639.35 *** | 31.90 | 0.90 | 0.38 | 0.94 |
Locules | 0.87 *** | 1.48 *** | 0.76 *** | 0.02 | 0.80 | 0.22 | 0.96 |
Lycopene | 1.58 *** | 1.91 *** | 1.51 *** | 0.01 | 0.72 | 0.16 | 0.95 |
Marketable yield | 0.55 *** | 0.71 *** | 0.52 *** | 0.01 | 0.73 | 0.17 | 0.96 |
Pericarp thickness | 0.03 *** | 0.05 *** | 0.03 *** | 0.07 | 0.77 | 0.20 | 0.95 |
Polar diameter | 0.83 *** | 0.55 *** | 0.88 *** | 0.01 | 0.56 | 0.10 | 0.97 |
Total yield | 0.56 *** | 0.91 *** | 0.50 *** | 0.01 | 0.78 | 0.22 | 0.96 |
TSS | 0.35 *** | 0.28 *** | 0.36 *** | 0.01 | 0.61 | 0.10 | 0.94 |
Diallel Inheritance Class | Mean | 2.50% | 25% | 50% | 75% | 97.50% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Inbred penalty (B) | 6.76 | 0.11 | 4.09 | 6.42 | 9.10 | 15.22 |
Additive (a) | 23.97 | 13.71 | 20.28 | 23.95 | 27.58 | 34.64 |
Inbred deviation (b) | 10.31 | 2.33 | 7.09 | 10.03 | 13.16 | 20.25 |
Total variance explained | 41.03 | 30.31 | 37.45 | 41.18 | 44.72 | 51.15 |
Unexplained variance | 58.97 | 48.85 | 55.28 | 58.82 | 62.55 | 69.69 |
Parent | Dry Matter a | Equatorial Diameter a | Fruit Weight a | Locules a | Lycopene a | Marketable Yield a | Pericarp Thickness a | Polar Diameter a | Total Yield a | TSS a |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | 0.091 *** | −0.201 *** | −12.458 *** | −0.022 *** | −0.121 *** | −0.333 *** | −0.009 ns | 0.061 * | −0.366 *** | 0.152 *** |
P2 | 0.346 *** | −0.181 *** | 6.773 *** | 0.355 *** | −0.415 *** | 0.188 *** | 0.003 ns | −0.020 ns | 0.151 *** | −0.048 * |
P3 | −0.105 *** | −0.098 *** | −15.122 *** | −0.298 *** | 0.454 *** | −0.133 *** | −0.007 ns | −0.061 * | −0.206 *** | 0.010 ns |
P4 | −0.121 *** | 0.273 *** | 8.495 *** | 0.261 *** | −0.086 ** | 0.048 ns | −0.002 ns | 0.025 ns | 0.089** | −0.168 *** |
P5 | −0.067 ** | 0.137 *** | 9.596 *** | −0.085 ** | −0.061 * | −0.180 *** | −0.016 * | 0.177 *** | −0.207 *** | 0.034 ns |
P6 | −0.178 *** | 0.041 ns | −0.690 ns | −0.273 *** | 0.427 *** | 0.161 *** | −0.038 *** | −0.257 *** | 0.154 *** | −0.071 ** |
P7 | 0.021 ns | 0.195 *** | 7.770 *** | −0.089 ** | 0.106 *** | 0.012 ns | 0.018 * | 0.263 *** | 0.032 ns | 0.023 ns |
P8 | 0.170 *** | 0.168 *** | 8.453 *** | 0.350 *** | −0.169 *** | 0.018 ns | 0.115 *** | −0.039 ns | 0.023 ns | 0.195 *** |
P9 | 0.033 ns | −0.045 ns | 4.867 *** | 0.126 *** | 0.213 *** | −0.070 ** | 0.029 *** | −0.178 *** | −0.050 * | −0.011 ns |
P10 | −0.185 *** | 0.007 ns | −0.081 ns | −0.120 *** | −0.215 *** | 0.141 *** | −0.035 *** | 0.060 * | 0.215 *** | −0.098 *** |
P11 | −0.003 ns | −0.296 *** | −17.605 *** | −0.205 *** | −0.132 *** | 0.148 *** | −0.058 *** | −0.032 ns | 0.164 *** | −0.019 ns |
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kaushik, P.; Dhaliwal, M.S. Diallel Analysis for Morphological and Biochemical Traits in Tomato Cultivated under the Influence of Tomato Leaf Curl Virus. Agronomy 2018, 8, 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8080153
Kaushik P, Dhaliwal MS. Diallel Analysis for Morphological and Biochemical Traits in Tomato Cultivated under the Influence of Tomato Leaf Curl Virus. Agronomy. 2018; 8(8):153. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8080153
Chicago/Turabian StyleKaushik, Prashant, and Major Singh Dhaliwal. 2018. "Diallel Analysis for Morphological and Biochemical Traits in Tomato Cultivated under the Influence of Tomato Leaf Curl Virus" Agronomy 8, no. 8: 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8080153