Next Article in Journal
Profiling of the Differential Abundance of Drought and Salt Stress-Responsive MicroRNAs Across Grass Crop and Genetic Model Plant Species
Previous Article in Journal
Agriculture’s Moral Dilemmas and the Need for Agroecology
Article Menu
Issue 7 (July) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Agronomy 2018, 8(7), 117; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8070117

Evaluating Bioenergy Cropping Systems towards Productivity and Resource Use Efficiencies: An Analysis Based on Field Experiments and Simulation Modelling

1
Institute of Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Agronomy and Crop Science, Christian-Albrechts-University, Hermann-Rodewald-Str. 9, 24118 Kiel, Germany
2
Landesbetrieb Landwirtschaft Hessen, Landwirtschaftszentrum Eichhof, Schlossstr. 1, 36251 Bad Hersfeld, Germany
3
Institute of Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Grass and Forage Science/Organic Agriculture, Christian-Albrechts-University, Hermann-Rodewald-Str. 9, 24118 Kiel, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 14 June 2018 / Revised: 6 July 2018 / Accepted: 10 July 2018 / Published: 11 July 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [1870 KB, uploaded 11 July 2018]   |  

Abstract

Silage maize (Zea mays L.) is the dominating energy crop for biogas production due to its high biomass yield potential, but alternatives are currently being discussed to avoid environmental problems arising from maize grown continuously. This study evaluates the productivity and resource use efficiency of different bioenergy crops and cropping systems using experimental and simulation modelling derived data. The field experiment consisted of two years, two sites differing in soil texture and soil water availability, different cropping systems and increasing nitrogen (N) supply. Continuous (two years) perennial ryegrass and two crop rotations including winter cover crops (double cropping system) and combining C4 and C3 crops were compared with continuous maize (maize–maize). The productivity of the crops and cropping systems in terms of dry matter (DM) yield was analyzed with respect to the fraction of light interception and light use efficiency (LUE). In addition, water use and water use efficiency (WUE), N uptake, and N use efficiency (NUE) were quantified. DM yield of the double cropping system was similar to that of continuous maize, due to a prolonged leaf area duration, compensating for the intrinsic lower LUE of C3 crops. Perennial ryegrass was less productive than the other crops/cropping systems. Nitrogen uptake and consequently N demand of perennial ryegrass and the C3 crops of the crop rotations were higher than for maize–maize. Groundwater recharge was mainly site-dependent, but was at both sites higher for maize than for the crop rotations or the perennial ryegrass system. Our results indicate that, in terms of biomass productivity, optimized rotations are feasible alternatives to maize–maize, but trade-offs exist in terms of water and N use efficiency. View Full-Text
Keywords: bioenergy; biomass; cropping systems; maize; wheat; grasses; water use efficiency; nitrogen use efficiency bioenergy; biomass; cropping systems; maize; wheat; grasses; water use efficiency; nitrogen use efficiency
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Wienforth, B.; Knieß, A.; Böttcher, U.; Herrmann, A.; Sieling, K.; Taube, F.; Kage, H. Evaluating Bioenergy Cropping Systems towards Productivity and Resource Use Efficiencies: An Analysis Based on Field Experiments and Simulation Modelling. Agronomy 2018, 8, 117.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Agronomy EISSN 2073-4395 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top