Study on the Environmental Behavior and Ecological Effects of Exogenous Proteins from Insect-Resistant Corn in Soil
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Soil Sample and Leaf Treatment
2.2. Soil Physicochemical Property Determination and Exogenous Protein Detection
2.3. Soil DNA Extraction and Bacterial 16S rDNA Gene Sequencing Using Illumina MiSeq
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Protein Degradation Kinetics
3.2. Effects of Degradation on Soil Physicochemical Properties
3.3. Soil Microbial Community Composition of Bt-Transgenic Maize
3.3.1. Sequencing Results and Assessment of the Soil Samples
3.3.2. Alpha Diversity Analysis of Soil Microbial Communities
3.3.3. Soil Microbial Community Beta Diversity Analysis
3.3.4. Analysis of Soil Microbial Community Compositions and Their Differences
3.3.5. Molecular Ecological Network Analysis of Soil Microbial Communities
3.3.6. Soil Microbial Community Construction Mechanism
4. Discussion
4.1. Degradation Patterns of the Cry1A.401 Protein in Different Transgenic Materials
4.2. Effects of Genetically Modified Maize Leaf Degradation on Soil Physicochemical Properties
4.3. Impacts of Genetically Modified Insect-Resistant Maize Leaves on Soil Microbial Communities
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Appendix A.1
| Material Name | Index Model | R | p | DT50 (d) | DT90 (d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CM8302 | y = 1.1057e−0.1245 t | 0.9870 | <0.0001 | 6.37 | 14.30 |
| CM8303 | y = 1.0922e−0.1211 t | 0.9862 | <0.0001 | 6.45 | 14.74 |
Appendix A.2
| Degradation Time | Cry1A.401 Protein Degradation in CM8302% | Cry1A.401 Protein Degradation in CM8303% |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 1 | 93.91 | 93.03 |
| 2 | 86.76 | 85.93 |
| 3 | 80.75 | 79.53 |
| 4 | 79.26 | 73.58 |
| 5 | 69.05 | 67.65 |
| 6 | 54.53 | 57.69 |
| 7 | 48.92 | 50.07 |
| 8 | 43.13 | 47.78 |
| 9 | 37.27 | 42.81 |
| 10 | 31.97 | 36.78 |
| 11 | 29.42 | 28.79 |
| 12 | 22.28 | 21.78 |
| 13 | 18.39 | 17.71 |
| 14 | 10.93 | 10.03 |
| 15 | 9.57 | 9.31 |
| 16 | 9.38 | 9.16 |
| 17 | 8.07 | 8.30 |
| 18 | 8.00 | 7.92 |
| 19 | 7.37 | 7.31 |
| 20 | 6.67 | 6.84 |
| 30 | 5.87 | 5.26 |
| 45 | 3.47 | 3.84 |
| 60 | 1.50 | 1.59 |
| 90 | 0.56 | 0.87 |
Appendix A.3
| Soil Sample | TN/% | NO2−-N/(mg/kg) | SOM/% | NO3−-N/(mg/kg) | Soil pH | NH4+-N/(mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NT_0 | 0.315 ± 0.006 a | 0.100 ± 0.087 a | 1.359 ± 0.043 a | 4.808 ± 0.256 a | 7.03 ± 0.050 a | 43.327 ± 3.031 a |
| C02_0 | 0.321 ± 0.006 a | 0.087 ± 0.025 a | 1.402 ± 0.029 a | 4.368 ± 0.759 a | 6.89 ± 0.090 a | 55.840 ± 12.478 a |
| C03_0 | 0.320 ± 0.003 a | 0.110 ± 0.078 a | 1.370 ± 0.064 a | 3.913 ± 0.614 a | 6.97 ± 0.080 a | 42.009 ± 8.292 a |
| NT_5 | 0.317 ± 0.004 a | 0.250 ± 0.061 a | 1.345 ± 0.002 a | 6.241 ± 0.687 a | 6.56 ± 0.130 a | 96.899 ± 5.741 b |
| C02_5 | 0.323 ± 0.006 a | 0.177 ± 0.025 a | 1.400 ± 0.076 a | 4.954 ± 0.736 a | 6.74 ± 0.115 a | 126.497 ± 16.240 a |
| C03_5 | 0.320 ± 0.001 a | 0.240 ± 0.087 a | 1.365 ± 0.026 a | 4.937 ± 0.940 a | 6.78 ± 0.200 a | 113.152 ± 5.426 ab |
| NT_10 | 0.316 ± 0.005 a | 0.380 ± 0.036 a | 1.326 ± 0.013 b | 8.001 ± 1.495 a | 6.67 ± 0.080 a | 183.085 ± 2.718 a |
| C02_10 | 0.322 ± 0.005 a | 0.307 ± 0.162 a | 1.373 ± 0.023 a | 6.430 ± 0.741 ab | 6.64 ± 0.200 a | 168.850 ± 8.382 b |
| C03_10 | 0.320 ± 0.002 a | 0.327 ± 0.071 a | 1.344 ± 0.006 ab | 5.874 ± 0.143 b | 6.88 ± 0.120 a | 189.180 ± 7.946 a |
| NT_15 | 0.319 ± 0.003 a | 0.680 ± 0.110 a | 1.441 ± 0.010 c | 8.126 ± 0.221 a | 6.50 ± 0.180 a | 240.454 ± 0.073 b |
| C02_15 | 0.324 ± 0.001 a | 0.703 ± 0.095 a | 1.531 ± 0.013 a | 7.441 ± 1.067 ab | 6.30 ± 0.212 a | 203.465 ± 5.937 c |
| C03_15 | 0.321 ± 0.005 a | 0.730 ± 0.210 a | 1.481 ± 0.002 b | 6.205 ± 0.266 b | 6.64 ± 0.110 a | 250.560 ± 4.281 a |
| NT_20 | 0.319 ± 0.004 a | 1.670 ± 0.087 a | 1.526 ± 0.010 b | 9.821 ± 0.290 b | 6.64 ± 0.110 a | 258.518 ± 7.386 a |
| C02_20 | 0.324 ± 0.001 a | 1.587 ± 0.031 a | 1.603 ± 0.023 a | 10.148 ± 0.217 ab | 6.58 ± 0.060 a | 214.754 ± 6.985 b |
| C03_20 | 0.322 ± 0.004 a | 1.697 ± 0.105 a | 1.543 ± 0.001 b | 10.316 ± 0.197 a | 6.67 ± 0.110 a | 244.655 ± 9.826 a |
| NT_30 | 0.319 ± 0.003 a | 1.990 ± 0.207 a | 1.553 ± 0.027 b | 7.847 ± 0.470 a | 6.58 ± 0.90 a | 137.081 ± 13.315 a |
| C02_30 | 0.324 ± 0.004 a | 1.827 ± 0.015 a | 1.645 ± 0.054 a | 8.101 ± 0.360 a | 6.40 ± 0.110 a | 150.095 ± 6.223 a |
| C03_30 | 0.322 ± 0.002 a | 1.790 ± 0.020 a | 1.597 ± 0.045 ab | 6.486 ± 0.418 b | 6.64 ± 0.207 a | 136.453 ± 8.820 a |
| NT_60 | 0.318 ± 0.003 a | 0.760 ± 0.040 a | 1.584 ± 0.079 a | 7.001 ± 0.207 a | 6.62 ± 0.192 a | 89.347 ± 14.744 a |
| C02_60 | 0.324 ± 0.004 a | 0.710 ± 0.010 a | 1.668 ± 0.059 a | 6.729 ± 0.249 a | 6.33 ± 0.145 a | 106.514 ± 24.055 a |
| C03_60 | 0.321 ± 0.003 a | 0.720 ± 0.020 a | 1.629 ± 0.000 a | 6.726 ± 0.324 a | 6.40 ± 0.123 a | 85.941 ± 18.723 a |
Appendix A.4
| Days of Burial | CM8302 | CM8303 | Si-144 |
|---|---|---|---|
| The 0 day | 0.960 ± 0.000 a | 0.960 ± 0.000 a | 0.960 ± 0.000 a |
| The 5 day | 0.977 ± 0.006 a | 0.973 ± 0.006 a | 0.973 ± 0.006 a |
| The 10 day | 0.970 ± 0.000 a | 0.973 ± 0.006 a | 0.973 ± 0.006 a |
| The 15 day | 0.967 ± 0.006 a | 0.970 ± 0.000 a | 0.960 ± 0.009 a |
| The 20 day | 0.967 ± 0.006 a | 0.967 ± 0.006 a | 0.967 ± 0.006 a |
| The 30 day | 0.967 ± 0.006 a | 0.970 ± 0.000 a | 0.963 ± 0.006 a |
Appendix A.5
| Soil Physicochemical Properties | 0 d | 15 d | 30 d | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | p-Value | R2 | p-Value | R2 | p-Value | |
| NH4 + -N | 0.060 | 0.837 | 0.246 | 0.450 | 0.204 | 0.497 |
| SOM | 0.076 | 0.778 | 0.013 | 0.963 | 0.515 | 0.118 |
| NO2−-N | 0.494 | 0.135 | 0.256 | 0.418 | 0.463 | 0.117 |
| NO3−-N | 0.290 | 0.350 | 0.761 | 0.018 | 0.737 | 0.020 |
| pH | 0.123 | 0.657 | 0.500 | 0.122 | 0.039 | 0.880 |
| TN | 0.284 | 0.356 | 0.100 | 0.719 | 0.571 | 0.072 |
Appendix A.6
| Topological Properties | CM8302 (C02_0_15_30) | CM8303 (C03_0_15_30) | Si-144 (NT_0_15_30) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nodes | 628 | 312 | 364 |
| Edges | 1354 | 227 | 330 |
| Average Degree | 4.31 | 1.455 | 1.813 |
| Network diameter | 19.720 | 3.966 | 9.880 |
| Network Density | 0.007 | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Modularity | 0.785 | 0.979 | 0.96 |
| Clustering Coefficient | 0.473 | 0.699 | 0.639 |
| Average Path Length | 5.57 | 1.329 | 2.827 |
| Positive correlation | 1272 | 178 | 256 |
| Negative correlation | 82 | 49 | 74 |
Appendix A.7
| Topological Properties | Nodes | Edges | Average Degree | Network Diameter | Network Density | Modularity | Clustering Coefficient | Average Path Length | Positive Edges | Negative Edges |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C02_0 + NT_0 | 628 | 868 | 2.764 | 1 | 0.004 | 0.982 | 1 | 1 | 693 | 175 |
| C03_0 + NT_0 | 564 | 659 | 2.337 | 1 | 0.004 | 0.975 | 1 | 1 | 401 | 258 |
| C02_0 + C03_0 | 643 | 991 | 3.082 | 1 | 0.005 | 0.971 | 1 | 1 | 719 | 272 |
| C02_15 + NT_15 | 570 | 615 | 2.158 | 1 | 0.004 | 0.984 | 1 | 1 | 428 | 187 |
| C03_15 + NT_15 | 610 | 902 | 2.957 | 1 | 0.005 | 0.974 | 1 | 1 | 570 | 332 |
| C02_15 + C03_15 | 604 | 1181 | 3.911 | 1 | 0.006 | 0.954 | 1 | 1 | 806 | 375 |
| C02_30 + NT_30 | 904 | 4689 | 10.370 | 1 | 0.011 | 0.919 | 1 | 1 | 3931 | 758 |
| C03_30 + NT_30 | 848 | 3915 | 9.233 | 1 | 0.011 | 0.889 | 1 | 1 | 2738 | 1177 |
| C02_30 + C03_30 | 670 | 1189 | 3.549 | 1 | 0.005 | 0.974 | 1 | 1 | 830 | 359 |
Appendix A.8
Appendix A.8.1. Method for the Cry1A.401 Protein
- (1)
- To the 0.2 g soil and 0.02 g leaf powder contained in the aforementioned 2.0 mL centrifuge tube (with a 2 mm hole at the top), 300 μL of sample extraction buffer (at room temperature) was added. The tube was sealed with sealing film, vortexed, shaken for 30 min, and then centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 3 min.
- (2)
- Preparation of standards: 1000 μL of sample extraction buffer was added to the standard provided with the kit and vortexed to mix thoroughly, yielding a standard solution with a concentration of 3.2 ng/mL. Subsequently, 500 μL of this solution was aspirated and mixed with 500 μL of sample extraction buffer to achieve a concentration of 1.6 ng/mL. Standard solutions with concentrations of 0.8 ng/mL, 0.4 ng/mL, and 0.2 ng/mL were sequentially prepared using the same serial dilution method.
- (3)
- Sample Loading: The diluted standard solutions, prepared samples, and blank control were added to the wells of the microplate (100 μL per well). The plate was gently shaken for mixing and then incubated in the dark on a shaker for 45 min.
- (4)
- Washing: The liquid in the microplate was decanted by inversion, and the plate was inverted onto absorbent paper to remove residual liquid. Washing buffer (200 μL per well) was added to the wells without touching them. This washing step was repeated 4–5 times.
- (5)
- Enzyme Conjugate Incubation: Enzyme conjugate working solution (100 μL per well) was added. After gentle shaking for mixing, the plate was wrapped in tin foil and incubated at 25 °C for 30 min. Following incubation, the plate was washed 4 times as described in step (4).
- (6)
- Color Development: Substrate solution (100 μL per well) was added, and the plate was incubated at 25 °C for 15 min.
- (7)
- Measurement: Stop solution (100 μL per well) was added, and the plate was gently shaken to mix. The absorbance of each sample was measured at dual wavelengths of 450 nm and 630 nm using a microplate reader.
Appendix A.8.2. Method for Soil pH Measurement
- (1)
- 10.0 g of air-dried soil passed through a 2 mm sieve was weighed using a balance with a precision of 0.01 g, placed in a 50 mL beaker, mixed with 25 mL of distilled water, and stirred for 1 min with a glass rod to fully disperse the soil particles.
- (2)
- After stirring, the suspension was allowed to stand for 30 min.
- (3)
- The electrode was inserted into the suspension, ensuring that it did not touch the bottom or walls of the beaker. The beaker was gently swirled to allow full contact between the electrode and the suspension until the reading stabilized, at which point the value was recorded.
- (4)
- After each measurement, the electrode was removed, rinsed with distilled water, and blotted dry with filter paper before proceeding to the next sample. After all samples were measured, the electrode was rinsed and dried again, and finally stored in a 3 mol/L potassium chloride (KCl) solution for maintenance.
Appendix A.8.3. Method for Soil Organic Matter
- (1)
- Precisely weigh 0.5000 g of soil sample passed through a 0.25 mm sieve into a clean, hard glass tube. Using a pipette, sequentially add 5 mL of potassium dichromate standard solution and 5 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid. Gently swirl to mix, and place a small funnel on the mouth of the tube (to condense escaping vapor and reduce evaporation).
- (2)
- Place the test tube in a wire rack and immerse it in an oil bath preheated to 185–190 °C. When the temperature drops to 170–180 °C and boiling is observed inside the tube, start timing and maintain boiling for 5 min. Immediately remove the wire rack, allow the tube to cool slightly, wipe off any oil from its outer surface, and transfer the digested solution into a 150 mL conical flask.
- (3)
- Rinse the tube and funnel thoroughly several times with distilled water, bringing the total volume of the wash solution to 60–70 mL. After cooling, add 3 drops of o-phenanthroline indicator and titrate with 0.2 mol/L ferrous sulfate (FeSO4) solution. The endpoint is indicated by a color change from orange to bluish-green, followed by a sharp transition to brick red. Record the volume of FeSO4 consumed.
- (4)
- For each batch of samples, run a blank determination by replacing the soil sample with pure quartz sand or ignited soil, and record the volume of FeSO4 used.
Appendix A.8.4. Method for Total Soil Nitrogen
- (1)
- Weigh 1.0000 g of air-dried soil sample passed through a 0.149 mm sieve and carefully transfer it to the bottom of a Kjeldahl flask. Perform two blank and two replicate determinations simultaneously. Add 2.0 g of mixed catalyst (a mixture of potassium sulfate (K2SO4), copper sulfate (CuSO4), and selenium (Se) in a ratio of 100:10:1) and 8 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid. Swirl to mix, place the flask on the digestion rack, and hang the rack on the temperature-controlled digestion unit. Align the upper funnel over the Kjeldahl flask, then gently press the descent key to lower the digestion rack. Ensure the rack is properly positioned so that the flask fits securely with the base to avoid breakage.
- (2)
- Set the digestion program to 200 °C for 1 h, followed by 375 °C for 2.5 h. Turn on the fume hood and drainage, then start the program. After digestion, the flask will automatically rise. Allow it to cool before removal, then turn off the instrument.
- (3)
- Prior to sample distillation, check the nitrogen distillation unit and run the “0” program to rinse the pipeline by performing 2–3 empty distillations. After the digest has cooled, place the Kjeldahl flask onto the distillation unit. Position the absorption chamber (a beaker) under the condenser outlet, add an appropriate amount of boric acid solution to submerge the tip of the condenser, and execute program “1”.
- (4)
- Once the program is complete, remove the absorption chamber, add two drops of mixed indicator for nitrogen determination, and titrate with a standard hydrochloric acid solution. The endpoint is reached when the color changes from bluish-green to purplish-red. Simultaneously, perform distillation and titration of the blank digest to correct for reagent errors. Remove the Kjeldahl flask while wearing double gloves, as the distillation generates heat and liquid may overflow. Rinse the unit with distilled water before proceeding to the next sample.
- (5)
- After all tests are completed, run one empty distillation to rinse the pipeline. Clean the Kjeldahl flasks and place them in the distillation unit, then turn off the unit. Rinse the internal parts of the instrument with distilled water and clean any residual solutions from the exterior.
Appendix A.8.5. Method for Ammonium Nitrogen
Appendix A.8.6. Method for Nitrite Nitrogen
Appendix A.8.7. Method for Nitrate Nitrogen
References
- Farias, J.R.; Andow, D.A.; Horikoshi, R.J.; Sorgatto, R.J.; Fresia, P.; dos Santos, A.C.; Omoto, C. Field-evolved resistance to Cry1F maize by Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Brazil. Crop Prot. 2014, 64, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, L.-Y.; Li, J.; Yuan, H.-W.; Yao, J.-H.; Li, W.; Chen, X.-Y. Expression analysis of Bt-BADH-GA20ox-rolB multigenes in transgenic tobacco plants. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2011, 33, 86–90. [Google Scholar]
- Palm, C.; Donegan, K.; Harris, D.; Seidler, R. Quantification in soil of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstakiδ-endotoxin from transgenic plants. Mol. Ecol. 1994, 3, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Feng, Y.; Luo, S. Effects of Bt corn straw decomposition on soil enzyme activities and soil fertility. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao = J. Appl. Ecol. 2005, 16, 524–528. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng, P.; Feng, Y.-j.; Zhang, W.-c.; Zhang, Y.-f.; Dong, W.-c.; Wang, J.-w. Change of Bt protein in soil after growing Bt corns and returning corn straws to soil and its effects on soil nutrients. Yingyong Shengtai Xuebao 2014, 25, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Shu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zeng, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. Effects of Cry1Ab Bt maize straw return on bacterial community of earthworm Eisenia fetida. Chemosphere 2017, 173, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.; Chen, X.; Qi, L.; Chen, F.; Liu, M.; Whalen, J.K. Root and detritus of transgenic Bt crop did not change nematode abundance and community composition but enhanced trophic connections. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 644, 822–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.K.; Dubey, S.K. Current trends in Bt crops and their fate on associated microbial community dynamics: A review. Protoplasma 2016, 253, 663–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.-j.; Feng, M.-c.; Xiao, L.-j.; Song, X.-y.; Yang, W.-d.; Ding, G.-w. Impact of water content and temperature on the degradation of Cry1Ac protein in leaves and buds of Bt cotton in the soil. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e115240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, Y.; Ling, L.; Fan, H.; Liu, Y.; Tan, F.; Shu, Y.; Wang, J. Effects of temperature, water content and pH on degradation of Cry1Ab protein released from Bt corn straw in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43, 1600–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaman, M.; Mirza, M.S.; Irem, S.; Zafar, Y. A Temporal Expression of Cry1Ac Protein in Cotton Plant and its Impact on Soil Health. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2015, 17, 280–288. [Google Scholar]
- Fang, W.; Wang, Q.; Han, D.; Liu, P.; Huang, B.; Yan, D.; Ouyang, C.; Li, Y.; Cao, A. The effects and mode of action of biochar on the degradation of methyl isothiocyanate in soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 565, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Q.; Gao, S.; Wang, D.; Spokas, K.; Cao, A.; Yan, D. Mechanisms for 1, 3-dichloropropene dissipation in biochar-amended soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 2531–2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carretta, L.; Cardinali, A.; Marotta, E.; Zanin, G.; Masin, R. Dissipation of terbuthylazine, metolachlor, and mesotrione in soils with contrasting texture. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 2018, 53, 661–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumgarte, S.; Tebbe, C.C. Field studies on the environmental fate of the Cry1Ab Bt-toxin produced by transgenic maize (MON810) and its effect on bacterial communities in the maize rhizosphere. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 2539–2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.W.; Luo, S.M.; Feng, Y.J. Environmental fate and ecological effects of Bt toxin from transgenic Bt crops in soil. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2003, 23, 797–804. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Luo, Z.; Wang, H.; Liu, F. The fate of fusion Cry1Ab/1Ac proteins from Bt-transgenic rice in soil and water. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 124, 455–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Wyk, D.A.; Adeleke, R.; Rhode, O.H.; Bezuidenhout, C.C.; Mienie, C. Ecological guild and enzyme activities of rhizosphere soil microbial communities associated with Bt-maize cultivation under field conditions in North West Province of South Africa. J. Basic Microbiol. 2017, 57, 781–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, H.; Wu, W.; Chen, Y.; Wang, H.; Devare, M.; Thies, J.E. Soil microbial community responses to Bt transgenic rice residue decomposition in a paddy field. J. Soils Sediments 2010, 10, 1598–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valldor, P.; Miethling-Graff, R.; Martens, R.; Tebbe, C.C. Fate of the insecticidal Cry1Ab protein of GM crops in two agricultural soils as revealed by 14C-tracer studies. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 7333–7341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, L.; Min, W.; Hong-wei, S.; Shu-ke, Y.; Xing-bo, L. Dynamics of Cry1Ab protein content in the rhizosphere soil and straw debris of transgenic Bt corn. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol./Yingyong Shengtai Xuebao 2013, 24, 1907–1913. [Google Scholar]
- Crowther, T.W.; Van den Hoogen, J.; Wan, J.; Mayes, M.A.; Keiser, A.; Mo, L.; Averill, C.; Maynard, D.S. The global soil community and its influence on biogeochemistry. Science 2019, 365, eaav0550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Falkowski, P.G.; Fenchel, T.; Delong, E.F. The microbial engines that drive Earth’s biogeochemical cycles. Science 2008, 320, 1034–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luo, X.; Hou, E.; Zhang, L.; Kuang, Y.; Wen, D. Altered soil microbial properties and functions after afforestation increase soil carbon and nitrogen but not phosphorus accumulation. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2023, 59, 645–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sokol, N.W.; Slessarev, E.; Marschmann, G.L.; Nicolas, A.; Blazewicz, S.J.; Brodie, E.L.; Firestone, M.K.; Foley, M.M.; Hestrin, R.; Hungate, B.A. Life and death in the soil microbiome: How ecological processes influence biogeochemistry. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022, 20, 415–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Vries, F.T.; Griffiths, R.I.; Bailey, M.; Craig, H.; Girlanda, M.; Gweon, H.S.; Hallin, S.; Kaisermann, A.; Keith, A.M.; Kretzschmar, M. Soil bacterial networks are less stable under drought than fungal networks. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tapp, H.; Stotzky, G. Persistence of the insecticidal toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1998, 30, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rui, Y.-K.; Yi, G.-X.; Zhao, J.; Wang, B.-M.; Li, Z.-H.; Zhai, Z.-X.; He, Z.-P.; Li, Q.X. Changes of Bt toxin in the rhizosphere of transgenic Bt cotton and its influence on soil functional bacteria. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 21, 1279–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhaolei, L.; Naishun, B.; Xueping, C.; Jun, C.; Manqiu, X.; Zhiping, S.; Ming, N.; Changming, F. Soil incubation studies with Cry1Ac protein indicate no adverse effect of Bt crops on soil microbial communities. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 152, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Liang, Y.-s.; Hu, T.; Zeng, H.; Gao, R.; Wang, L.; Xiao, Y.-h. Environmental fate of Bt proteins in soil: Transport, adsorption/desorption and degradation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 226, 112805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Shi, J.; Yu, Z.; Pan, A.; Tang, X.; Ming], F. Impact of transgenic Cry1Ac + CpTI cotton on diversity and dynamics of rhizosphere bacterial community of different root environments. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 637–638, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fazal, A.; Wen, Z.; Yang, M.; Liao, Y.; Fu, J.; He, C.; Wang, X.; Jie, W.; Ali, F.; Hu, D. Deciphering the rhizobacterial assemblages under the influence of genetically engineered maize carrying mcry genes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 60154–60166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Singh, R.J.; Ahlawat, I.; Singh, S. Effects of transgenic Bt cotton on soil fertility and biology under field conditions in subtropical inceptisol. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2013, 185, 485–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, Q.; Dai, R.; Ruan, Y.; Rensing, C.; Liu, M.; Guo, S.; Ling, N.; Shen, Q. Probing active microbes involved in Bt-containing rice straw decomposition. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 10273–10284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Lu, T.; Cheng, M. Changes of collagenase activity in immune hepatic fibrosis following pig’s serum injection and therapeutic effect of HanDanGanLe. Chin. J. Hepatol. 2000, 8, 108–109. [Google Scholar]
- Bradstreet, R.B. Kjeldahl Method for Organic Nitrogen. Anal. Chem. 1954, 26, 169–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cataldo, D.A.; Maroon, M.; Youngs, L.E.S.L. Rapid colorimetric determination of nitrate in plant tissue by nitration of salicylic acid1. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1975, 6, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edgar, R.C. UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilcoxon, F. Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods. Biom. Bull. 1945, 1, 80–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herman, R.A.; Scherer, P.N.; Young, D.L.; Mihaliak, C.A.; Meade, T.; Woodsworth, A.T.; Stockhoff, B.A.; Narva, K.E. Binary insecticidal crystal protein from Bacillus thuringiensis, strain PS149B1: Effects of individual protein components and mixtures in laboratory bioassays. J. Econ. Entomol. 2002, 95, 635–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Head, G.; Surber, J.B.; Watson, J.A.; Martin, J.W.; Duan, J.J. No Detection of Cry1Ac Protein in Soil After Multiple Years of Transgenic Bt Cotton (Bollgard) Use. Environ. Entomol. 2002, 31, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zwahlen, C.; Hilbeck, A.; Gugerli, P.; Nentwig, W. Degradation of the Cry1Ab protein within transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corn tissue in the field. Mol. Ecol. 2003, 12, 765–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Wu, K.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, G. Degradation of Cry1Ac Protein Within Transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis Rice Tissues Under Field and Laboratory Conditions. Environ. Entomol. 2007, 36, 1275–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shilei, Y.; Lei, Z.; Hongwei, S.; Xiaoyan, T.; Fan, L.I.; Xingbo, L.U. Effects of planting and straw returning of transgenic Bt maize on soil enzyme activities under field condition. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2011, 24, 1259–1270. [Google Scholar]
- Yao, H.; Gao, Y.; Nicol, G.W.; Campbell, C.D.; Prosser, J.I.; Zhang, L.; Han, W.; Singh, B.K. Links between ammonia oxidizer community structure, abundance, and nitrification potential in acidic soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 4618–4625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thevenot, M.; Dignac, M.-F.; Rumpel, C. Fate of lignins in soils: A review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42, 1200–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, L.; Li, J.; Lei, N.; Xie, H.; Lu, C.; Chen, X.; Ma, S.; Zhang, J.; Müller, C.; He, H.; et al. Stover mulching in no-tillage farming reduces ammonia volatilization in the Mollisol of Northeast China: Insights from gross N transformation dynamics. Soil Tillage Res. 2024, 240, 106068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Deeb, M.A.; Wilde, G.E.; Blair, J.M.; Todd, T.C. Effect of Bt Corn for Corn Rootworm Control on Nontarget Soil Microarthropods and Nematodes. Environ. Entomol. 2003, 32, 859–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Griffiths, B.S.; Caul, S.; Thompson, J.; Birch, A.N.E.; Scrimgeour, C.; Andersen, M.N.; Cortet, J.; Messéan, A.; Sausse, C.; Lacroix, B.; et al. A comparison of soil microbial community structure, protozoa and nematodes in field plots of conventional and genetically modified maize expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis CrylAb toxin. Plant Soil 2005, 275, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scheffknecht, S.; Mammerler, R.; Steinkellner, S.; Vierheilig, H. Root exudates of mycorrhizal tomato plants exhibit a different effect on microconidia germination of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici than root exudates from non-mycorrhizal tomato plants. Mycorrhiza 2006, 16, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isik, I.; Guenther, S. Cry3Bb1 protein from Bacillus thuringiensis in root exudates and biomass of transgenic corn does not persist in soil. Transgenic Res. 2008, 17, 609–620. [Google Scholar]
- Röttjers, L.; Faust, K. From hairballs to hypotheses-biological insights from microbial networks. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2018, 42, 761–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xuan, Z.P.; Feng, H.Y.; Chen, M.Q.; Xu, J.; Liu, M.X.; Zhao, B.Z.; Zhang, J.B. Effects of Straw Returning Combined with Chemical Fertilizer on Soil Ecosystem Multifunctionality. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2025, 58, 2821–2837. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.; Wang, D.J.; Zhang, G. Effect of incorporated straw-nitrogen fertilizer on nutrient leaching in paddy soils. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. 2010, 18, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saavedra, S.; Stouffer, D.B.; Uzzi, B.; Bascompte, J. Strong contributors to network persistence are the most vulnerable to extinction. Nature 2011, 478, 233–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Qiu, T.; He, H.; Liu, J.; Duan, C.; Cui, Y.; Huang, M.; Wu, C.; Fang, L. High nitrogen fertilizer input enhanced the microbial network complexity in the paddy soil. Soil Ecol. Lett. 2023, 6, 230205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peay, K.G.; Kennedy, P.G.; Talbot, J.M. Dimensions of biodiversity in the Earth mycobiome. Nat Rev Microbiol 2016, 14, 434–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leibold, M.A.; Holyoak, M.; Mouquet, N.; Amarasekare, P.; Chase, J.M.; Hoopes, M.F.; Holt, R.D.; Shurin, J.B.; Law, R.; Tilman, D.; et al. The metacommunity concept: A framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7, 601–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, S.; Liu, H.; Liu, S.; Yin, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Cao, H. Distribution and Assembly Processes of Soil Fungal Communities along an Altitudinal Gradient in Tibetan Plateau. J Fungi 2021, 7, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stegen, J.C.; Johnson, T.; Fredrickson, J.K.; Wilkins, M.J.; Konopka, A.E.; Nelson, W.C.; Arntzen, E.V.; Chrisler, W.B.; Chu, R.K.; Fansler, S.J.; et al. Influences of organic carbon speciation on hyporheic corridor biogeochemistry and microbial ecology. Nat Commun 2018, 9, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripathi, B.M.; Stegen, J.C.; Kim, M.; Dong, K.; Adams, J.M.; Lee, Y.K. Soil pH mediates the balance between stochastic and deterministic assembly of bacteria. ISME J 2018, 12, 1072–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Johnston, E.R.; Liu, W.; Li, L.; Han, X. Environmental changes affect the assembly of soil bacterial community primarily by mediating stochastic processes. Glob Chang Biol 2016, 22, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Zhang, Q.; Cui, H.; Li, S.; Li, Y.; Xie, K.; Pan, Y.; Chen, Y.; Di, H.; Zhang, L.; Dong, L.; et al. Study on the Environmental Behavior and Ecological Effects of Exogenous Proteins from Insect-Resistant Corn in Soil. Agronomy 2026, 16, 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16050560
Zhang Q, Cui H, Li S, Li Y, Xie K, Pan Y, Chen Y, Di H, Zhang L, Dong L, et al. Study on the Environmental Behavior and Ecological Effects of Exogenous Proteins from Insect-Resistant Corn in Soil. Agronomy. 2026; 16(5):560. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16050560
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhang, Qi, Huize Cui, Shuhan Li, Yujuan Li, Kexin Xie, Yanguang Pan, Yang Chen, Hong Di, Lin Zhang, Ling Dong, and et al. 2026. "Study on the Environmental Behavior and Ecological Effects of Exogenous Proteins from Insect-Resistant Corn in Soil" Agronomy 16, no. 5: 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16050560
APA StyleZhang, Q., Cui, H., Li, S., Li, Y., Xie, K., Pan, Y., Chen, Y., Di, H., Zhang, L., Dong, L., Zhou, Y., Zhang, J., Xing, J., Li, C., Wang, Z., & Zeng, X. (2026). Study on the Environmental Behavior and Ecological Effects of Exogenous Proteins from Insect-Resistant Corn in Soil. Agronomy, 16(5), 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16050560

