Next Article in Journal
Biochar Application Methods Matter: Biochemical and Enological Responses of an Italian Field-Grown Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) Using Solid and Liquid Formulations
Previous Article in Journal
Data-Driven Integration of Remote Sensing, Agro-Meteorology, and Wireless Sensor Networks for Crop Water Demand Estimation: Tools Towards Sustainable Irrigation in High-Value Fruit Crops
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Sanqi Cultivation on Soil Fertility and Heavy Metal Content in the Sanqi–Pine Agroforestry System

1
College of Landscape Architecture and Horticulture, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
2
Key Laboratory of In-Forest Resource Protection and Utilization in Yunnan Province, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
3
College of Biotechnology and Engineering, West Yunnan University, Lincang 677000, China
4
Key Laboratory for Forest Resources Conservation and Utilization in the Southwest Mountains of China, Southwest Forestry University, Ministry of Education, Kunming 650224, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Agronomy 2025, 15(9), 2123; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15092123
Submission received: 23 July 2025 / Revised: 27 August 2025 / Accepted: 3 September 2025 / Published: 4 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effects of Agronomic Practices on Soil Properties and Health)

Abstract

The Sanqi–pine agroforestry (SPA) system is considered a sustainable agroforestry model. However, empirical studies that clearly elucidate the impact of Sanqi cultivation on soil fertility and the heavy metal content within the SPA system are still lacking. This study established monoculture Pinus armandii (MPA) and SPA systems to conduct a comparative analysis of dynamic changes in soil physicochemical properties and the heavy metal content of Sanqi and pine over one year (with semi-monthly sampling), followed by a comprehensive evaluation of soil fertility and heavy metal pollution. Following the land use conversion from MPA to SPA, there was a notable increase in soil moisture (SM), total nitrogen (TN), and nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) levels within Sanqi soil. Conversely, total potassium (TK), ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N), plumbum (Pb), and chromium (Cr) levels experienced a significant reduction. In the case of pine soil, soil moisture (SM), pH levels, and ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) content exhibited an increase. However, soil organic carbon (SOC), total phosphorus (TP), total potassium (TK), zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn), plumbum (Pb), and chromium (Cr) contents all significantly decreased. The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) demonstrated that Sanqi cultivation not only significantly enhanced soil fertility for Sanqi rather than pine but also reduced the heavy metal content in the soil of both Sanqi and pine within the SPA system. Furthermore, the Nemerow pollution index for both Sanqi and pine soils has decreased, transitioning the pollution status from relatively safe to safe. This suggests that the introduction of Sanqi promotes the sustainable development of the SPA system.

1. Introduction

Soil serves as the foundation for the health and sustainable development of agroforestry systems [1]. However, heavy metals, as toxic substances, are characterized by their strong bioaccumulation potential and persistent environmental presence, posing substantial risks to both ecological systems and human health [2,3]. On one hand, geochemical and geological/mineral factors are crucial in shaping soil properties, nutrient availability, as well as the concentrations and migration of heavy metals, which collectively determine the chemical composition and physical structure of soil, thereby exerting significant impacts on plant growth and ecosystem health [4]. On the other hand, factors such as plant introduction [5], soil niche [6], and seasonal dynamics [7] can significantly influence soil fertility and heavy metal content by regulating both biotic and abiotic factors. The level of soil fertility and the extent of heavy metal contamination are critical for the healthy development of agroforestry systems [8]. Hence, a systematic assessment of soil fertility is crucial for providing a scientific basis for species configuration in agroforestry systems [9,10]. Additionally, a comprehensive analysis of the content and pollution status of heavy metals in agroforestry systems is significant for ensuring the sustainable development of these systems. The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) primarily used for descriptive and comparative analysis, is a multi-criteria decision-making method based on the positive and negative ideal solution [11]. Previous studies have revealed that determining the weights of various indicators through the entropy weight method and constructing an evaluation system combined with the TOPSIS model demonstrates objectivity and accuracy [12]. Heavy metal contamination in agroforestry systems originates from a mix of natural sources, such as the weathering of metal-bearing rocks, volcanic eruptions [2], and atmospheric deposition [13], as well as anthropogenic sources including industrial emissions, agricultural practices, and transportation [14,15,16]. In the assessment of soil heavy metal pollution, the Nemerow method effectively reflects the overall pollution status through a comprehensive index, which is particularly crucial for evaluations under complex geological conditions [17]. This approach not only circumvents the one-sidedness of single-factor evaluation but also overcomes the dilution effect of simple averaging methods [17].
Agroforestry ecosystems combine the cultivation techniques of trees and crops, representing a sustainable development strategy that profoundly affects soil fertility and the concentration of heavy metals [18]. It is also significantly influenced by the species of plants, the ecological niches of the soil, and the fluctuations of the seasons [5,6,7]. Studies have shown that introducing plants can significantly enhance the soil fertility of both native trees and the introduced plants [19]. For instance, the Camellia sinensisJuglans regia/Glycine max agroforestry system notably increased the soil pH, ammonium nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, and organic matter content in C. sinensis soil [20,21]. Similarly, the Saccharum officenarumG. max agroforestry system also significantly improved the organic carbon and nitrate nitrogen content in G. max soil [22]. However, the effects of introducing plants on the heavy metal content in both in situ trees and the soil of the introduced plants are inconsistent [5]. For example, agroforestry systems such as Sedum plumbizincicolaTriticum aestivum/Phyllostachys praecox/Phyllostachys edulis [23,24,25] and Citrus reticulataC. sinensis [26] can effectively reduce the heavy metal content in soil. The Mn and Zn content in C. sinensis soil were increased in the C. sinensisC. reticulata system, whereas the Cu, Zn, and Cd content in Sedum plumbizincicola soil showed an increasing trend in the Phyllostachys edulisSedum plumbizincicola system [24,26]. This is attributed to differences in the introduction or in situ plant species [5,27,28], variations in soil properties [29], and alterations in enzyme activity [30]. Moreover, alterations within specific ecological niches can exert an influence on soil fertility and the content of heavy metals. For example, within the Capsicum annuumZea mays intercropping system, a notable increase in available potassium, total nitrogen, and organic matter content was observed in the rhizosphere rather than non-rhizosphere soil of Capsicum annuum [31]. Conversely, in the Tamarix ramosissima/Phyllostachys praecoxSedum plumbizincicola system, the concentrations of Zn, Cu, Pb, and Cd in the rhizosphere soil of Phyllostachys praecox and Tamarix ramosissima were significantly reduced, as opposed to the non-rhizosphere soil [6,25]. These variations may be intricately linked to root exudation [32], plant absorption capabilities [33], transpiration intensity [34], and processes of heavy metal chelation [35].
Sanqi (Panax notoginseng), a precious traditional Chinese medicinal herb, primarily grows in Yunnan and Guangxi Provinces of China [36]. Research has shown that Sanqi has significant pharmacological effects, including the enhancement of immunity, reduction in inflammation, lowering of blood pressure, and inhibition of tumor growth [37,38,39]. However, to meet the increasing market demand, some farmers have adopted strategies such as expanding cultivation areas and relying heavily on pesticides and chemical fertilizers to boost yield. This practice not only exacerbates the problem of continuous cropping obstacles but also adversely affects the quality of Sanqi. As a local medicinal herb in Yunnan Province, Sanqi contributes to over 50 percent of the total output value of the province’s traditional Chinese medicine industry. The cultivation of Sanqi from the forest understorey aligns with China’s Non-agricultural use of cultivated land, addressing the industrial challenge of Sanqi’s lack of available cultivation land. Recent studies have demonstrated that Sanqi cultivated from the P. armandii forest has been proven to effectively alleviate continuous cropping obstacles [40], improve quality [41], enhance nitrogen fixation capacity [42], and significantly reduce contamination risks [43]. Furthermore, Sanqi can transfer beneficial microorganisms to pine trees and mitigate carbon limitation issues within the microbial communities of pine soil [44,45]. In addition, during the organic cultivation of Sanqi, the avoidance of chemical fertilizers and pesticides may subject its growth and quality to the influence of soil fertility and heavy metal content. Simultaneously, the root system activity of P. armandii and the decomposition of its litter also exert significant impacts on the dynamics of soil fertility and heavy metals. Therefore, an in-depth investigation into the effects of Sanqi cultivation on soil fertility and heavy metal content in the SPA system will not only help optimize species allocation in agroforestry systems but also provide theoretical support for formulating scientific and rational soil management strategies. This study established monoculture P. armandii (MPA) and SPA systems to comparatively analyze the dynamic changes in soil physicochemical properties and heavy metal content of Sanqi and P. armandii over one year (with biweekly sampling). A comprehensive evaluation was further conducted on soil fertility and heavy metal pollution. The following hypotheses were proposed: (I) Sanqi cultivation significantly enhances soil fertility for Sanqi rather than pine, with an increase of over 50%, and (II) reduces the heavy metal content in the soil of both Sanqi and P. armandi within the SPA system by 18% and 39%, respectively. This research revealed the impact of Sanqi cultivation on the relationship between soil fertility and heavy metal content, providing a scientific basis for the health and sustainable development of the SPA system.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Research Location

This study was conducted in Dadishui Village, Xundian County, Kunming City (103°12′45″ E, 25°28′18″ N), which belongs to the subtropical plateau monsoon climate zone and exhibits distinct monsoon climate characteristics [42]. Winters and springs are relatively dry with scarce rainfall, while summers and autumns are humid and rainy. The average annual precipitation reaches 1900 mm, and the mean annual temperature is 14.5 °C. In the SPA system, the forest slope ranges between 5° and 15°, with an elevation of approximately 2199 m. The soil type is red earth, and the forest is predominantly composed of P. armandii trees planted over 30 years ago, with a canopy density of about 0.7–0.9, an average diameter at breast height of 18 cm, and an average tree height of 9.5 m.
Before commencing the cultivation of Sanqi, the undergrowth was meticulously cleared of weeds, small shrubs, and decomposing leaves. Following this, the area underwent thorough deep plowing, executed two to three times with a compact rotary tiller, penetrating to a depth of 20 to 30 cm. Subsequently, the soil in the undergrowth was expertly fashioned into raised beds, which followed the natural contour lines of the terrain. These beds formed plots with dimensions of 10 to 20 m in length, 1 to 1.5 m in width, and a height ranging from 0.30 to 0.40 m. Following the method proposed by Jia et al. [44], in January 2020, we transplanted one-year-old Sanqi seedlings at a spacing of 10–15 cm × 10–15 cm per plant, with a transplanting depth of 3–5 cm, and immediately covered them with a 3–5 cm thick layer of pine needles post-transplantation. Routine management measures primarily involved the prohibition of pesticide and chemical fertilizer use, manual rodent control, and the installation of a drip irrigation system to regularly supplement water during the dry season.

2.2. Experimental Design and Soil Sampling

We utilized a randomized block design to conduct two experiments to examine the effects of land use conversion from the MPA to the SPA system on the soils of Sanqi and P. armandii, respectively (Figure 1). The five treatments and their abbreviation were as follows:
Experiment 1: To investigate the impact of the transition from the MPA system to the SPA system on soil fertility and heavy metal content in Sanqi, we established two treatment groups: one was the bulk soil of the MPA system (MPA-B), and the other was the soil cultivated with Sanqi in the SPA system (Pn).
Experiment 2: To clarify the effects of Sanqi cultivation on soil fertility and heavy metal content in P. armandii soils, we designed four treatment groups. These included the bulk soil of the MPA system (MPA-B), the rhizosphere soil of the MPA system (MPA-R), the bulk soil of the SPA system (SPA-B), and the rhizosphere soil of the SPA system (SPA-R).
Given the presence of repeated treatments in Experiments 1 and 2, this study included a total of 5 different treatments. For each treatment, 3 replicate plots (each measuring 10 m × 10 m) were established, resulting in a total of 15 plots. The monitoring period spanned a full year (from 10 September 2020, to 20 August 2021). During this period, we collected a total of 360 soil samples, calculated as follows: 5 (treatments) × 3 (plot replicates per treatment) × 12 (months) × 2 (sampling/semi-month). Soil samples were collected using the five-point sampling method and thoroughly mixed to form a single composite sample [42]. The soil adhering to the root surface (0–2 mm) of P. armandii was considered as rhizosphere soil [46]. Simultaneously, soil samples were collected approximately 20 cm away from the roots of P. armandii to serve as bulk soil. The collected soil samples were rapidly transported back to the laboratory using dry ice. After sieving through a 2 mm mesh screen, the samples were divided into two groups and stored at 4 °C and room temperature, respectively, for subsequent analysis.

2.3. Determination of Soil Properties

Soil moisture (SM) was calculated by measuring the ratio of the wet weight of the soil to its dry weight [44]. A pH meter (Model AB23 PH-F, Beijing, China) was used to determine the soil pH value [47]. The potassium dichromate oxidation method was employed to measure the soil organic carbon (SOC) [48]. A continuous flow analyzer (Seal Auto Analyzer AA3, Berlin, Germany) was utilized for precise quantitative analysis of total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N), and nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) [49]. After digestion with HF-HCl-HNO3-HClO4, the content of elements such as total potassium (TK), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), lead (Pb), chromium (Cr), and cadmium (Cd) was determined by flame atomic absorption spectrometry AA-6300 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) [43].

2.4. TOPSIS Analysis of Soil Fertility and Heavy Metals

We selected SM, pH value, TN, TP, TK, NH4+-N, NO3-N, and SOC to evaluate soil fertility and chose Zn, Cu, Mn, Pb, Cr, and Cd to comprehensively assess heavy metal pollution levels. First, standardize the physicochemical properties and heavy metal content of the soil, and then determine the weights of each indicator based on the entropy weight method. Subsequently, calculate the relative closeness of soil fertility and heavy metal content using the improved Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method [50]. The specific methods are as follows:
Entropy method weighting analysis.
(a)
Data standardization:
Positive   indicators :   u i j = x i j m i n ( x i j ) m a x ( x i j ) m i n ( x i j )
Negative   indicators :   u i j = m a x ( x i j ) x i j m a x ( x i j ) m i n ( x i j )
where u i j     is the value of indicator j in the i sample (i = 1, 2, n; j = 1, 2, n), and max ( x i j ) and min ( x i j ) are the maximum and minimum values, of indicator x i j , respectively, and u i j is the normalized x i j .
(b)
Calculate the weight of the i sample data under the j indicator for that indicator a i j :
a i j = u i j i = 1 n u i j
(c)
Taking E j as the entropy value of the j indicator:
E j = k i = 1 n a i j l n ( a i j ) , k = 1 / ln ( n )   >   0 ,   E j 0
(d)
Weighting of the Indicator Wj:
W j = 1 E j j = 1 m D j   1 , 2 , 3 ,   m
Comprehensive analysis by improved TOPSIS method.
(a)
Normalize the original matrix R = ( r i j )m×n to obtain a normalized decision matrix Z = { Z j i }:
Z j i     = r i j i = 1 m r i j 2   i   =   1 ,   m ;   j   =   1 ,   ,   n e i θ
(b)
Obtain the weighted decision evaluation matrix X = ( x i j ):
  x i j = W j   ×   Z j i ,   i   =   1 , . ,   m ;   j   =   1 , . ,   n      
(c)
Determine the positive and negative ideal solutions for each indicator:
The positive ideal solution:
x 1 j   =   max { x i j } min { x i j } , j   =   1 , . ,   n  
The negative ideal solution:
x 2 j   =   min { x i j } max { x i j }   , j   =   1 , . ,   n
(d)
Distances to positive and negative ideal solutions were calculated for each indicator.
The distance from x j to the positive ideal solution is:
d 1 j   =   j = 1 n ( x i j x 1 j ) 2     i   =   1 , . ,   m  
The distance from x j to the negative ideal solution is:
d 2 j   =   j = 1 n ( x i j x 2 j ) 2     i   =   1 , . ,   m  
(e)
Calculation of relative proximity:
C i = d 2 j / ( d 2 j + d 1 j ) ,   i = 1 ,   m
C i represents the relative proximity, and its value range is [0, 1]. The larger the value of C i for soil fertility and heavy metals, the higher the content of soil fertility and soil heavy metals.

2.5. Evaluation of the Contaminated Levels of Heavy Metals

According to the “Soil Environmental Quality Risk Control Standard for Agricultural Land” (GB15618-2018) [51], the risk screening values for heavy metals in soil environmental quality are shown in Table 1. Upon the application of Equations (1) and (2), it is possible to ascertain the pollution levels of individual heavy metals and a combination of six heavy metals, respectively [52]. For comprehensive evaluation criteria, reference should be made to Table 2.
P i = C i / S i
P C o m = { ( P 2 m a x + P 2 a v e ) / 2 } 1 2
Ci represents the content of heavy metal (i), Si is the risk screening value for soil heavy metals, PCom denotes the Nemerow pollution index, and Pave and Pmax indicate the average and maximum values of Pi, respectively.

2.6. Sensitivity Analysis

Sensitivity analysis can not only reveal the relative contribution of various parameters to the assessment results but also serves as an important method to verify the rationality of the selected indicators [53]. A higher sensitivity index for different parameters indicates a greater influence of those parameters on the assessment results.
S i = | ( V i N v i n ) | V i   ×   100 %
where S i represents the sensitivity of ith assessing unit, Vi and vi are the values of ith assessing unit and ith input index after removal, N and n are the number of parameters.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The Shapiro–Wilk test and Levene’s test were employed to evaluate the normality and homogeneity of variance of the dataset, respectively. Consequently, SPSS 19.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to conduct a repeated measures analysis of variance (RMANOVA) to evaluate the physicochemical properties, heavy metal content, and their relative proximity in soils under different treatments. Post hoc comparisons were conducted using Tukey’s HSD test, and confidence intervals were estimated using frequentist approaches. The corrplot and readxl packages in R language (Version 1.6.2) were utilized to generate correlation heatmaps between soil physicochemical properties and heavy metals. During the correlation analysis, to effectively minimize the likelihood of false positive findings, the data underwent correction for false discovery rate (FDR).

3. Results

3.1. Variation Characteristics of Edaphic Factors and Evaluation of Soil Fertility in MPA and SPA Systems

The annual dynamic changes in soil factors exhibited certain differences (Figure 2A). Analysis of annual average values showed that after land use conversion from MPA to SPA, the contents of SM, TN, and NO3-N in Sanqi soil increased significantly, while TK and NH4+-N contents decreased significantly. No significant differences were observed in pH value, SOC, and TP contents (Figure 2B, Table S1). Moreover, the cultivation of Sanqi significantly increased the SM, pH, and NH4+-N content in the soil of P. armandii, whereas the SM content and pH value in bulk soil were higher than those in rhizosphere soil. In contrast, the contents of TN, TP, TK, and SOC decreased in the soil of P. armandii, with no significant difference observed between rhizosphere and bulk soils (Figure 2B). Additionally, there was no significant difference in NO3-N content between the MPA and SPA systems.
Utilizing the entropy weight method and an enhanced TOPSIS technique, we conducted a thorough assessment of soil fertility within both MPA and SPA. The annual variation range of relative proximity across various treatments was observed to be between 0.056 and 0.924 (Figure 3A). The cultivation of Sanqi significantly increased the relative proximity of soil fertility (p < 0.05). Annual data revealed that in the MPA system, the relative proximity of bulk soil fertility for P. armandii is significantly higher than that of rhizosphere soil, whereas in the SPA system, no significant difference is observed between the relative proximity of bulk and rhizosphere soil fertility for P. armandii (Figure 3B, Table S2). The two-factor analysis of variance indicated that the treatment significantly affected soil fertility (p < 0.001), while the interaction between time and treatment did not show significant effects (Table S3).

3.2. Analysis of Soils Heavy Metal Variation Characteristics and Pollution in MPA and SPA System

The annual dynamic changes in heavy metals in soil are shown in Figure 4A. When the land use transitioned from pure forest to Sanqi, the Pb and Cr contents in Sanqi soil decreased significantly, while the changes in Zn, Cu, Mn, and Cd contents were not significant (Figure 4B). Meanwhile, the contents of Zn, Mn, Pb, and Cr in P. armandii soil also decreased significantly, while the changes in Cu and Cd contents were not obvious. Furthermore, in both MPA and SPA systems, except for Mn, no significant differences were observed in the contents of other heavy metals between rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils of P. armandii (Figure 4B, Table S4).
Utilizing the entropy weight method and an enhanced TOPSIS technique, we conducted a thorough evaluation of the concentrations of six heavy metals. This study revealed that the annual variation range of relative proximity for heavy metals in soils subjected to different treatments was between 0.026 and 0.962 (Figure 5A). As the land use pattern transitioned from pure forest to Sanqi, the relative proximity of heavy metals in both Sanqi and pine soils exhibited a significant decrease, with no significant difference noted between the non-rhizosphere and rhizosphere soils of pine trees (Figure 5B, Table S5). As indicated in Table S6, the treatment, time, and their interaction significantly affect soil heavy metal content.
The pollution level of heavy metals in the soil was assessed using the Nemerow pollution index (Table 3 and Table S7). The Nemerow pollution index values for the different treatments ranged from 0.784 to 0.971, all falling below 1.0, indicating that the soil was in a relatively clean (threshold) degree. The Nemerow pollution index for heavy metals in both Sanqi and pine soils shows a significant decrease after Sanqi cultivation, indicating that the pollution level of the soils has improved from the clean (threshold) to clean (safe). Furthermore, the non-rhizosphere rather than rhizosphere soil of the pine exhibited lower pollution levels.

3.3. Sensitivity Analysis in the TOPSIS and Nemerow Index

In this study, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify the key factors influencing soil fertility, soil heavy metals, and the Nemerow index. The results indicated that NO3-N exerted the most significant influence on soil fertility, with a sensitivity of up to 14.33% (Figure 6A). Furthermore, the degree of impact of each parameter on soil heavy metals and the Nemerow index followed the order: Cr > Cd > Pb > Cu > Zn > Mn and Cr > Cd > Mn > Pb > Cu > Zn, respectively (Figure 6B,C).

3.4. Analysis of the Correlation Between Physicochemical Properties and Heavy Metals in the Soils of Sanqi and P. armandi

There was a significant negative correlation between soil fertility and heavy metal content (p < 0.001), indicating that higher soil fertility generally corresponds to lower heavy metal levels (Figure 7). For Sanqi soils, Pb exhibited negative correlations with soil SM and NO3-N (Figure 8A). Cr also showed negative correlations with both SM and TP content. Similarly, Cd displayed a negative correlation with TP content. However, Zn was positively correlated with TK, TP, and NH4+-N (Figure 8A). Additionally, soil pH was positively correlated with Cu content. For pine soils (Figure 8B), the content of Zn showed a negative correlation with SM and pH but exhibited significant positive correlations with TK, TN, TP, and SOC content (p < 0.01). Both Mn and Pb were negatively correlated with SM, while demonstrating significant positive correlations with TK, TN, TP, and SOC content. Cr displayed a positive correlation with TN but showed significant negative correlations with NH4+-N and NO3-N. Cd exhibited negative correlations with TK and NH4+-N, respectively.

4. Discussion

4.1. The Land Use from the MPA to the SPA System Enhanced the Soil Fertility for Sanqi Rather than P. armandi

Compared to the MPA system, the SPA system significantly increased the SM, TN, and NO3-N content in Sanqi soil, while also enhancing the pH, SM, and NH4+-N levels in P. armandi soil (Figure 2). There are variations in the practices of different plants within agroforestry systems, which subsequently result in differences in soil nutrient composition. For instance, the sugarcane–soybean system has been shown to significantly increase NO3-N content in the soil of soybean [22], while the tea–soybean system has assisted in improving the pH and increasing NH4+-N content in the soil of tea [21]. During the cultivation process of Sanqi, reducing direct sunlight exposure [54], regularly replenishing water [55], and applying pine needle litter [56] can effectively minimize soil moisture evaporation, thereby increasing soil water content. Meanwhile, the application of organic fertilizers (such as humic acid) provides soil microorganisms with sufficient carbon sources, effectively enhancing microbial activity, thereby strengthening nitrogen mineralization and significantly increasing inorganic nitrogen content in the soil [45,57]. Additionally, prior to cultivating Sanqi, the application of lime is used to raise soil pH levels to meet the growth requirements of Sanqi and to facilitate the accumulation of its medicinal components [58]. TOPSIS analysis results further revealed that introducing Sanqi into the SPA system could significantly enhance the soil fertility of Sanqi, while the soil fertility of P. armandi remained relatively stable (Figure 3). The entropy weight and sensitivity analysis also indicated that NO3-N contributed the most to enhancing soil fertility, accounting for 26.29% and 14.33%, respectively. Previous studies have shown that NO3-N has a direct effect on soil fertility [59]. In addition, cultivation of Sanqi increases the diversity and network complexity of nitrogen-fixing microorganisms [42]. Therefore, we concluded that the addition of organic fertilizer and changes in nitrogen-fixing microorganisms were the main factors that increased NO3-N content.

4.2. Land Use Conversion of the MPA to the SPA System Reduced Heavy Metal Content in the Soil of Sanqi and P. armandi

With land use converted from MPA to SPA, a significant decrease in Pb and Cr content was observed in the Sanqi soil. Concurrently, the Zn, Mn, Pb, and Cr content in P. armandi soil also exhibited a notable declining trend (Figure 4). Moreover, the relative proximity of heavy metals decreased in both Sanqi and pine soils. These findings align with research results from agroforestry systems such as Sedum plumbizincicolaTriticum aestivum/Phyllostachys violascens/Phyllostachys edulis, as well as Citrus reticulataCamellia sinensis [23,24,25,26]. However, the types of heavy metal content reduction in the SPA system differ from those in other agroforestry systems, which is attributed to factors such as the nutrient requirements of Sanqi, soil tillage, water management, organic fertilizer application, and so on. The intercropping model significantly enhances plants’ heavy metal absorption capacity by promoting root secretion of organic acids [60,61]. Prior study has indicated that the chelating properties of organic acids are especially important because they create stable complexes with metals, increasing their mobility and availability for plant uptake [62]. Organic acids, including phenolic and palmitic acids, obtained from the roots of Sanqi plants cultivated in forests rather than on farmland [47], may stabilize and solubilize metal ions in the soil, thereby promoting their transport to plant roots. Moreover, Sanqi cultivation can alter the community structure of bacteria, fungi and nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the soil [42,44], and changes in their community structure or activity could result in lead to changes in metal morphology and bioavailability. Previous studies have indicated that the SPA system improved the heavy metal uptake ability of both Sanqi and P. armandii [43], while demonstrating no negative impact on either the quality of Sanqi [41] or the growth of P. armandii [45]. Furthermore, soil tillage not only leads to a reduction in SOC content, thereby weakening the soil’s adsorption capacity for heavy metals [63], but also mixes heavy metals from the surface soil into deeper soil layers [64], effectively reducing the heavy metal content in the soil of the SPA system. Rainfall and water replenishment significantly affect the leaching and scouring processes of surface soil, thereby influencing the migration and concentration of heavy metals [65]. In the SPA system, the use of drip irrigation facilities to supplement water for Sanqi may also contribute to the reduction in heavy metal content in the surface soil. In addition, the application of organic fertilizers can promote the mineralization of soil organic carbon and effectively reduce the bioavailability of heavy metals in the soil [66]. Supplementing organic fertilizers before the cultivation process of Sanqi is also an important measure for reducing heavy metal content in the soil. Additionally, no significant difference was observed between the non-rhizosphere and rhizosphere soils of pine in the SPA and MPA systems following Sanqi cultivation (Figure 5B). Heavy metals in soil exist in various binding forms, such as sulfides, organic matter, carbonates, and oxides of iron and magnesium [67]. During plant growth, variations in the bioavailability of these heavy metals can directly influence their uptake and utilization by plants [68]. Therefore, the total concentration of metals may remain unchanged, while their bioavailability could vary.

4.3. The Relationship Between Soil Fertility and Heavy Metal Content in the Soil of Sanqi and P. armandi

The cultivation of Sanqi significantly reduced the heavy metal content in the soil of both the Sanqi and P. armandii within the SPA system, correspondingly elevating the pollution level from relatively clean (threshold) degree to clean (safe) degree. Most of the essential nutrient elements required for plant growth and development are derived from the soil, with a close correlation existing between the mineral element content of the soil and Sanqi plants [50]. Non-edible plants that can accumulate heavy metal elements can be effectively utilized for remediation of soil heavy metal pollution, thereby contributing to ecological restoration [69,70]. In contrast, the elemental content of edible plants must be controlled within safe limits to prevent potential health hazards to people through food chain circulation [71,72]. Meanwhile, analysis of the average sensitivity regarding the heavy metal content, the contribution rate of chromium (Cr) reached 6.37% (Figure 6). It is worth noting that there is a significant negative correlation between soil fertility and heavy metal content (Figure 7), while the correlations between different nutrient elements and heavy metals also vary (Figure 8). This indicates that appropriate management measures play a crucially positive role in reducing heavy metal content in soil. Moreover, in the Sanqi soil, the content of Cr showed a negative correlation with the content of SM and TP (Figure 8A). In contrast, in the P. armandii soil, Cr exhibited a positive correlation with the content of TN, while showing a significant negative correlation with the content of NH4+-N and NO3-N (Figure 8B). The soil in the MPA and SPA systems showed no signs of heavy metal pollution; however, the single-factor pollution index of Cr was relatively high (0.86), potentially being the main contributor to the increased the Nemerow pollution index. Notably, although the current heavy metal content has not yet reached the pollution threshold, long-term accumulation may pose potential threats to the soil ecosystem. Therefore, it is recommended to regularly monitor the changes in heavy metal content in the SPA system and implement corresponding management measures, such as rational application of phosphorus fertilizers and water management, to prevent the occurrence of heavy metal pollution and ensure the healthy growth of Sanqi and P. armandi as well as the stability of the soil ecology.
It is important to acknowledge several limitations of our study. Firstly, the sample size and duration in this research were not substantial enough, which may impact the generalizability of our results. Secondly, our study concentrated on a specific SPA system, and the findings may not be directly transferable to other types of agricultural systems or geographical areas. Looking ahead, we suggest conducting long-term monitoring studies to evaluate the temporal changes in heavy metal levels and their potential effects on crop growth and soil ecology. Furthermore, it would be beneficial to investigate more effective management strategies to alleviate heavy metal pollution, such as biochar amendments, water and fertilizer management, soil tillage, and litter coverage, and to assess their efficacy in reducing heavy metal accumulation in Sanqi and enhancing soil health.

5. Conclusions

The conversion of land use from the MPA to the SPA system resulted in an increase in SM, TN, and NO3-N levels in Sanqi soil and a decrease in Pb and Cr content. For pine soil, the levels of SM, pH, and NH4+-N increased, while the contents of Zn, Mn, Pb, and Cr all significantly decreased. Moreover, TOPSIS analysis demonstrated that Sanqi cultivation not only significantly enhanced soil fertility for Sanqi rather than pine but also reduced the heavy metal content in the soil of both Sanqi and P. armandi within the SPA system. Furthermore, the Nemerow pollution index for both Sanqi and P. armandi soils has decreased, transitioning the pollution status from relatively safe to safe. In addition, the content of Cr showed a negative correlation with the content of SM and TP in the Sanqi soil. Hence, we recommend the appropriate application of phosphate fertilizers and proper water management to prevent heavy metal pollution, ensuring the healthy growth of Sanqi and P. armandi as well as the stability of the soil ecosystem. Future research should concentrate on conducting long-term monitoring of the soil fertility and heavy metals within the SPA system, investigating the effects of management practices on the soil fertility and heavy metals, as well as elucidating the mechanisms among soil fertility, heavy metals and microbial community. In summary, our research findings enhance the understanding of the impact of Sanqi cultivation on soil fertility and heavy metals, offering valuable insights for improving the sustainable management of Sanqi and the management practices of other agroforestry systems.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy15092123/s1, Table S1: Annual average values and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for soil physicochemical properties. Table S2: Annual average value and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the relative proximity C of soil fertility. Table S3: The impact of treatment and interaction time, as well as their interactive effects, on the relative proximity C of soil fertility. Table S4: Annual average values and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for heavy metals in soil. Table S5: Annual average value and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the relative proximity C of soil heavy metals. Table S6: The impact of treatment, interaction time, and their interactive effects on the relative proximity C of heavy metals in soil. Table S7: The average value and the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the Nemerow Pollution Index for heavy metals in soil.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.L. and S.W.; methodology, J.H., K.L. and S.W.; software, K.L., X.Z. and R.R.; validation, K.L., X.Z. and R.R.; formal analysis, Y.L., X.Z., J.H., L.Y. and S.W.; investigation, X.Z., S.W. and X.H.; resources, K.L., Y.L., X.Z. and R.R.; data curation, J.H. and Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Z., K.L., Y.L., J.H., L.Y. and R.R.; writing—review and editing, S.W. and X.H.; visualization, K.L., X.Z., R.R., X.H. and S.W.; supervision, Y.L., J.H., L.Y. and S.W.; project administration, S.W. and X.H.; funding acquisition, L.Y., X.H., R.R. and S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Yunnan Fundamental Research Projects (202501BD070001-087; 202501BD070001-023; 202401BD070001-122), Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory (202402AN360005), Yunnan Province Innovation Team (202405AS350027), China Agriculture Research System of MOF & MARA (CARS-21-05B), and Academician (Expert) Workstations (202305AF150058).

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, L.X.; Bai, Y.F.; Han, X.G. Application of N: P Stoichiometry to Ecology Studies. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2003, 45, 1009–1018. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ali, H.; Khan, E.; Ilahi, I. Environmental chemistry and ecotoxicology of hazardous heavy metals: Environmental persistence, toxicity, and bioaccumulation. J. Chem. 2019, 2019, 6730305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yang, Q.; Li, Z.; Lu, X.; Duan, Q.; Huang, L.; Bi, J. A review of soil heavy metal pollution from industrial and agricultural regions in China: Pollution and risk assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 642, 690–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ji, W.B.; Luo, Z.X.; Huang, J.Y.; Liu, X.; He, H.Y.; Gong, Y.; Chen, M.; Wen, Y.B.; Ying, R.R. Geochemical behaviors of heavy metal(loid)s in soil ferromanganese nodules in Typical Karst Areas in Southwest China. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, Y.R.; Huang, L.K.; Wen, Z.Y.; Fu, Y.Y.; Liu, Q.Z.; Xu, S.N.; Li, Z.S.; Liu, C.J.; Yu, C.; Feng, Y. Effects of intercropping on safe agricultural production and phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 875, 162700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Qian, F.H.; Huang, X.J.; Su, X.M.; Bao, Y.Y. Responses of microbial communities and metabolic profiles to the rhizosphere of Tamarix ramosissima in soils contaminated by multiple heavy metals. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 438, 129469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, H.; Wen, S.Z. Seasonal variation in content of heavy metal elements among forest litters and soil layers of Liquidambar formosana plantation. Hunan For. Sci. Technol. 2016, 43, 118–121. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sekhar, M.; Lallawmkimi, M.C.; Rani, D.V.; Upadhyay, L.; Tiwari, P.; Verma, U.; Rajput, A. Agroforestry practices and their impact on soil health and fertility: A review. J. Exp. Agric. Int. 2024, 46, 511–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Y.H.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, X.H. Soil Fertility Evaluation of Wheat/Alfalfa Intercropping. Sch. J. Agric. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 16–20. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ramaswamy, V.; Sivakumar, K.; Thiyageshwari, S.; Anandham, R. Assessment on the Impact of Various Agroforestry Systems on Soil Quality Parameters. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. 2022, 34, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rahimi, M.; Thanh, H.V.; Ebrahimzade, I.; Abbaspour-Fard, M.H.; Rohani, A. A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach to determine the synthesizing routes of biomass-based carbon electrode material in supercapacitors. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 397, 136606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, J.; Liu, C.; Han, W. Efficiently evaluating heavy metal urban soil pollution using an improved entropy-method-based TOPSIS model. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2016, 71, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hovmand, M.F.; Kemp, K.; Kystol, J.; Johnsen, I.; Riis-Nielsen, T.; Pacyna, J.M. Atmospheric heavy metal deposition accumulated in rural forest soils of southern Scandinavia. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 155, 537–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhu, J.; Wang, Q.; Yu, H.; Li, M.; He, N. Heavy metal deposition through rainfall in Chinese natural terrestrial ecosystems: Evidences from national-scale network monitoring. Chemosphere 2016, 164, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wan, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhuang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Li, H. Heavy metals in agricultural soils: Sources, influencing factors, and remediation strategies. Toxics 2024, 12, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zehetner, F.; Rosenfellner, U.; Mentler, A.; Gerzabek, M.H. Distribution of road salt residues, heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons across a highway-forest interface. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2009, 198, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wei, J.; Zheng, X.G.; Liu, J.T. Modeling Analysis of Heavy Metal Evaluation in Complex Geological Soil Based on Nemerow Index Method. Metals 2023, 13, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kwak, J.H.; Lim, S.S.; Baah-Acheamfour, M.; Choi, W.J.; Fatemi, F.; Carlyle, C.N.; Bork, E.W.; Chang, S.X. Introducing trees to agricultural lands increases greenhouse gas emission during spring thaw in Canadian agroforestry systems. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 652, 800–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhong, Y.J.; Liang, L.N.; Xu, R.N.; Xu, H.Y.; Sun, L.L.; Liao, H. Intercropping tea plantations with soybean and rapeseed enhances nitrogen fixation through shifts in soil microbial communities. Front. Agric. Sci. Eng. 2022, 9, 344–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, H.Q.; Yuan, W.X.; Huang, W.; Wang, Q.M.; Wu, T.Y.; Wang, C.; Liu, W.H.; Zhang, S.H.; Wang, B.J. Walnut-tea intercropping model: Variations in secondary metabolites and microbial interactions in tea under metabolomics perspective. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2025, 227, 120774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Duan, Y.; Wang, T.; Lei, X.G.; Cao, Y.; Liu, L.F.; Zou, Z.W.; Ma, Y.C.; Zhu, X.J.; Fang, W.P. Leguminous green manure intercropping changes the soil microbial community and increases soil nutrients and key quality components of tea leaves. Hortic. Res. 2024, 11, uhae018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, Y.; Ma, W.Q.; He, H.L.; Wang, Z.T.; Cao, Y.H. Effects of sugarcane and soybean intercropping on the nitrogen-fixing bacterial community in the rhizosphere. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 713349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zou, J.C.; Song, F.P.; Lu, Y.Y.; Zhuge, Y.P.; Niu, Y.X.; Lou, Y.L.; Pan, H.; Zhang, P.H.; Pang, L.Y. Phytoremediation potential of wheat intercropped with different densities of Sedum plumbizincicola in soil contaminated with cadmium and zinc. Chemosphere 2021, 276, 130223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bian, F.Y.; Zhong, Z.K.; Li, C.Z.; Zhang, X.P.; Gu, L.J.; Huang, Z.C.; Gai, X.; Huang, Z.Y. Intercropping improves heavy metal phytoremediation efficiency through changing properties of rhizosphere soil in bamboo plantation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 416, 125898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bian, F.Y.; Zhong, Z.K.; Zhang, X.P.; Li, Q.L.; Huang, Z.Y. Bamboo-based agroforestry changes phytoremediation efficiency by affecting soil properties in rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere in heavy metal-polluted soil (Cd/Zn/Cu). J. Soils Sediments 2023, 23, 368–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wen, B.; Zhang, X.L.; Ren, S.; Duan, Y.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Zhu, X.J.; Wang, Y.H.; Ma, Y.C.; Fang, W.P. Characteristics of soil nutrients, heavy metals and tea quality in different intercropping patterns. Agrofor. Syst. 2020, 94, 963–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhu, S.Y.; Ma, X.W.; Guo, R.; Ai, S.W.; Liu, B.L.; Zhang, W.Y.; Zhang, Y.M. A field study on heavy metals phytoattenuation potential of monocropping and intercropping of maize and/or legumes in weakly alkaline soils. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2016, 18, 1014–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Guo, X.F.; Li, H.S.; Chen, H.Y. The effects of biochar and intercropping on the Cd, Cr and Zn speciation in soils and plant uptake by Machilus pauhoi. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2017, 98, 574–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Fijałkowski, K.; Kacprzak, M.; Grobelak, A.; Placek, A. The influence of selected soil parameters on the mobility of heavy metals in soils. Inż. Ochr. Śr. 2012, 15, 81–92. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tang, B.; Xu, H.P.; Song, F.M.; Ge, H.G.; Yue, S.Y. Effects of heavy metals on microorganisms and enzymes in soils of lead–zinc tailing ponds. Environ. Res. 2022, 207, 112174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Chen, Z.L.; Wang, W.Z.; Chen, L.; Zhang, P.; Liu, Z.H.; Yang, X.K.; Shao, J.L.; Ding, Y.; Mi, Y.H. Effects of pepper–maize intercropping on the physicochemical properties, microbial communities, and metabolites of rhizosphere and bulk soils. Environ. Microbiome 2024, 19, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, S.B.; He, F.K.; Kuzyakov, Y.; Xiao, H.X.; Hoang, D.T.T.; Pu, S.Y.; Razavi, B.S. Nutrients in the rhizosphere: A meta-analysis of content, availability, and influencing factors. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 826, 153908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yan, X.X.; An, J.; Yin, Y.C.; Gao, C.C.; Wang, B.Y.; Wei, S.H. Heavy metals uptake and translocation of typical wetland plants and their ecological effects on the coastal soil of a contaminated bay in Northeast China. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 803, 149871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhou, Y.W.; Peng, Y.S.; Li, X.L.; Chen, G.Z. Accumulation and partitioning of heavy metals in mangrove rhizosphere sediments. Environ. Earth Sci. 2011, 64, 799–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Balakrishnan, B.; Sahu, B.K.; Kothilmozhian Ranishree, J.; Lourduraj, A.V.; Nithyanandam, M.; Packiriswamy, N.; Panchatcharam, P. Assessment of heavy metal concentrations and associated resistant bacterial communities in bulk and rhizosphere soil of Avicennia marina of Pichavaram mangrove, India. Environ. Earth Sci. 2017, 76, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, S.Y.; Rui, R.; Wang, S.; He, X.H. Comparative analysis of the floral fragrance compounds of Panax notoginseng flowers under the Panax notoginseng-pinus agroforestry system using SPME-GC-MS. Molecules 2022, 27, 3565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Leung, K.W.; Cheung, L.W.T.; Pon, Y.L.; Wong, R.N.S.; Mak, N.K.; Fan, T.P.; Au, S.C.L.; Tombran-Tink, J.; Wong, A.S.T. Ginsenoside Rb1 inhibits tube-like structure formation of endothelial cells by regulating pigment epithelium-derived factor through the oestrogen β receptor. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 152, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Loh, Y.C.; Tan, C.S.; Ch’ng, Y.S.; Ng, C.H.; Yeap, Z.Q.; Yam, M.F. Mechanisms of action of Panax notoginseng ethanolic extract for its vasodilatory effects and partial characterization of vasoactive compounds. Hypertens. Res. 2019, 42, 182–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jiao, D.L.; Liu, Y.; Hou, T.; Xu, H.; Wang, X.Y.; Shi, Q.; Wang, Y.J.; Xing, Q.J.; Liang, Q.Q. Notoginsenoside R1 (NG-R1) promoted lymphatic drainage function to ameliorating rheumatoid arthritis in TNF-Tg mice by suppressing NF-κB signaling pathway. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 12, 730579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Luo, X.Z.; Hou, E.Q.; Chen, J.Q.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.L.; Zang, X.W.; Wen, D.Z. Dynamics of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stocks and stoichiometry resulting from conversion of primary broadleaf forest to plantation and secondary forest in subtropical China. Catena 2020, 193, 104606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, Y.; Hei, J.Y.; Wang, B.; Wang, S.; He, X.H. Unraveling the molecular mechanisms of flavonoid biosynthesis in Panax notoginseng flowers across planting patterns and developmental stages using integrated metabolomics and transcriptomics analyses. Sci. Hortic. 2024, 335, 113362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhao, X.Y.; He, S.; Rui, R.; Hei, J.Y.; He, X.H.; Wang, S. Introduction of Panax notoginseng into pine forests significantly enhances the diversity, stochastic processes, and network complexity of nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the soil. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1531875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yang, R.G.; Wang, M.L.; Rui, R.; Zhao, X.Y.; Zhang, X.Y.; Xiong, B.J.; He, X.H.; Wang, S. Distribution Characteristics of Mineral Elements and Pollution Evaluation of Heavy Metals in Pinus armandii-Panax notoginseng Planting Pattern. J. Shandong Agric. Sci. 2023, 55, 127–133. [Google Scholar]
  44. Jia, W.J.; Wang, S.; He, X.J.; Zhao, X.Y. Different factors drive the assembly of pine and Panax notoginseng-associated microbiomes in Panax notoginseng-pine agroforestry systems. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1018989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rui, R.; Hei, J.Y.; Li, Y.; Wan, X.L.; Wang, S.; He, X.H. Alleviating Microbial Carbon Limitation in Pinus armandii Forests Through Panax notoginseng Cultivation. Forests 2025, 16, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gong, C.; Ma, X.Y.; Song, Y.Y.; Zhang, D.; Zhu, M.Y.; Wang, X.W.; Gao, S.Q.; Gao, J.L.; Song, C.C. Characteristics of Microbial Abundance in Rhizosphere and Non-Rhizosphere Soils of Permafrost Peatland, Northeast China. Forests 2023, 14, 1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hei, J.Y.; Wang, S.; He, X.H. Effects of exogenous organic acids on the growth, edaphic factors, soil extracellular enzymes, and microbiomes predict continuous cropping obstacles of Panax notoginseng from the forest understorey. Plant Soil 2024, 503, 105–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jia, W.J.; Hei, J.Y.; He, X.H.; Wang, S. Altitude rather than season and slope aspect has the greatest effect on the bacterial communities in subtropical forests in Yunnan, China. Plant Soil 2024, 501, 57–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. He, S.; Rui, R.; Hei, J.Y.; Li, Y.; Faisal, N.; Wang, B.; He, X.H.; Wang, S. Organically managed Sanqi alters the soil C metabolism and purine metabolism pathway through metagenomic and metabolomic analyses. Plant Soil 2025, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tuo, Y.F.; Wang, Z.Y.; Zheng, Y.; Shi, X.L.; Liu, X.N.; Ding, M.J.; Yang, Q.L. Effect of water and fertilizer regulation on the soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen, enzyme activity, and saponin content of Panax notoginseng. Agric. Water Manag. 2023, 278, 108145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, Q.H.; Li, C.F.; Wang, H.; Wei, X.; Liu, Y.S.; Yang, R.D.; Wen, X.F. Geochemical characteristics of heavy metals in soil and blueberries of the core Majiang blueberry production area. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2021, 106, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Huang, Y.; Chen, Q.Q.; Deng, M.H.; Japenga, J.; Li, T.Q.; Yang, X.E.; He, Z.L. Heavy metal pollution and health risk assessment of agricultural soils in a typical peri-urban area in southeast China. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 207, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yang, S.M.; Wei, D.H.; Xie, Z.; Tao, L.C.; Chen, Q.S.; Uddin, M.G.; Wang, Y.S.; Huang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.H. Surface water and groundwater suitability assessment for drinking and irrigation in a coal-mining area of southwestern China: EWQI, IWQI, and sensitivity analysis. J. Environ. Sci. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tang, J.K.; Yang, Q.L.; Liang, J.P.; Wang, H.D.; Yue, X.L. Water management, planting slope indicators, and economic benefit analysis for Panax notoginseng production decision under shaded and rain-shelter cultivation: A three-year sloping fields experiment. Agric. Water Manag. 2024, 291, 108635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Huang, H.; Shi, Y.Z.; Luo, A.R.; Xiao, Y.N.; Liang, J.P.; He, Z.J. Effects of irrigation frequency on root growth, nutrients accumulation, yield, and water use efficiency of Panax notoginseng under micro-sprinkler irrigation. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1549506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Xing, Z.Q.; Yan, D.H.; Wang, D.Y.; Liu, S.S.; Dong, G.Q. Experimental analysis of the effect of forest litter cover on surface soil water dynamics under continuous rainless condition in North China. Kuwait J. Sci. 2018, 45, 75–83. [Google Scholar]
  57. Shen, F.Y.; Fei, L.J.; Tuo, Y.F.; Peng, Y.L.; Yang, Q.; Zheng, R.Q.; Wang, Q.; Liu, N.; Fan, Q.N. Effects of water and fertilizer regulation on soil physicochemical properties, bacterial diversity and community structure of Panax notoginseng. Sci. Hortic. 2024, 326, 112777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, Y.J.; Xu, J.; Lu, R.C.; Ye, C.; Huang, H.C.; Yang, M.; He, X.H.; Zhu, S.S. Modification of quicklime on acid soil under forest and their effect on the growth of Panax notoginseng. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2022, 33, 972–980. [Google Scholar]
  59. Wu, H.Q.; Du, S.Y.; Zhang, Y.L.; An, J.; Zou, H.T.; Zhang, Y.L.; Yu, N. Effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization on greenhouse soil organic nitrogen fractions and soil-soluble nitrogen pools. Agric. Water Manag. 2019, 216, 415–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lin, H.; Wang, Z.W.; Liu, C.J.; Dong, Y.B. Technologies for removing heavy metal from contaminated soils on farmland: A review. Chemosphere 2022, 305, 135457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ma, L.Y.; Wu, Y.J.; Wang, Q.; Feng, Y. The endophytic bacterium relieved healthy risk of pakchoi intercropped with hyperaccumulator in the cadmium polluted greenhouse vegetable field. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 264, 114796–114803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, H.J.; Zhang, R.Y.; Lu, T.T.; Qi, W.; Zhu, Y.W.; Lu, M.H.; Qi, Z.C.; Chen, W.F. Enhanced transport of heavy metal ions by low-molecular-weight organic acids in saturated porous media: Link complex stability constants to heavy metal mobility. Chemosphere 2022, 290, 133339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wen, J.J.; Li, Z.W.; Luo, N.L.; Huang, M.; Yang, R.; Zeng, G.M. Investigating organic matter properties affecting the binding behavior of heavy metals in the rhizosphere of wetlands. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 162, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zeng, J.J.; Zhou, S.L.; Lv, L.G.; Su, Q.L.; Wang, J. Soil heavy metal contamination in rural land consolidation areas in the Yangtze River Delta, China. J. Environ. Eng. Landsc. Manag. 2018, 26, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, F.; Li, W.; Wang, H.; Hu, Y.N.; Cheng, H.F. The leaching behavior of heavy metal from contaminated mining soil: The effect of rainfall conditions and the impact on surrounding agricultural lands. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 914, 169877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zaccone, C.; Di Caterina, R.; Rotunno, T.; Quinto, M. Soil-farming system-food-health: Effect of conventional and organic fertilizers on heavy metal (Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn) content in semolina samples. Soil Tillage Res. 2010, 107, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Basta, N.T.; Ryan, J.A.; Chaney, R.L. Trace element chemistry in residual-treated soil: Key concepts and metal bioavailability. J. Environ. Qual. 2005, 34, 49–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hu, Y.H.; Gao, Z.; Huang, Y.; Chen, S.; Yang, X.Y.; Su, J.Q.; Zhao, C.C.; Nan, Z.R. Impact of poplar-based phytomanagement on metal bioavailability in low-phosphorus calcareous soil with multi-metal contamination. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 686, 848–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Fan, J.Q.; Niu, L.C.; Pang, L. Characteristics of uptake and enrichment of soil heavy metals by different garden plants in Yunnan region. Jiangsu Agric. Sci. 2016, 44, 467–472. [Google Scholar]
  70. Yan, L.; Li, L.S.; Ni, X.F.; Li, C.X.; Li, J. Accumulation of Soil Heavy Metals in Five Species of Wetland Plants. Acta. Bot. Boreal. 2016, 36, 2078–2085. [Google Scholar]
  71. Yan, H.; Huang, X.Y.; Yu, S.; Zheng, X.; Wei, F.; Ma, S.C. Distribution of Heavy Metals and Trace Elements in Notoginseng Radix et Rhizoma with Different Colors from Yunnan Province. Mod. Chin. Med. 2022, 24, 86–93. [Google Scholar]
  72. Ou, X.; Wang, L.; Guo, L.; Cui, X.; Liu, D.; Yang, Y. Soil-plant metal relations in Panax notoginseng: An ecosystem health risk assessment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Design of experiment in the MPA and SPA systems. The green and red arrows denote the Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, respectively.
Figure 1. Design of experiment in the MPA and SPA systems. The green and red arrows denote the Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, respectively.
Agronomy 15 02123 g001
Figure 2. Dynamic variations in soil physicochemical properties over one year (A) and annual average values (B). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments.
Figure 2. Dynamic variations in soil physicochemical properties over one year (A) and annual average values (B). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments.
Agronomy 15 02123 g002
Figure 3. Changes in relative proximity C over one year (A) and annual average values (B). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 level.
Figure 3. Changes in relative proximity C over one year (A) and annual average values (B). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 level.
Agronomy 15 02123 g003
Figure 4. Dynamic variations in soil heavy metals one year (A) and annual average values (B). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 level.
Figure 4. Dynamic variations in soil heavy metals one year (A) and annual average values (B). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 level.
Agronomy 15 02123 g004
Figure 5. Changes in relative proximity C of heavy metals over one year (A) and annual average values (B). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Changes in relative proximity C of heavy metals over one year (A) and annual average values (B). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Agronomy 15 02123 g005
Figure 6. Analysis of average sensitivity for soil fertility (A), soil heavy metals (B), and Nemerow index (C).
Figure 6. Analysis of average sensitivity for soil fertility (A), soil heavy metals (B), and Nemerow index (C).
Agronomy 15 02123 g006
Figure 7. Correlation analysis between the soil fertility and the soil heavy metals. The gray shaded area shows the 95% confidence interval of the fit.
Figure 7. Correlation analysis between the soil fertility and the soil heavy metals. The gray shaded area shows the 95% confidence interval of the fit.
Agronomy 15 02123 g007
Figure 8. Spearman correlation analysis of soil heavy metals and edaphic factors in the soil of Sanqi (A) and pine (B). ***, **, and * represent p < 0.001, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively.
Figure 8. Spearman correlation analysis of soil heavy metals and edaphic factors in the soil of Sanqi (A) and pine (B). ***, **, and * represent p < 0.001, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively.
Agronomy 15 02123 g008
Table 1. Risk screening values for heavy metals in soil environmental quality.
Table 1. Risk screening values for heavy metals in soil environmental quality.
Heavy MetalsRisk Screening Value (mg/kg)
Zn200
Cu50
Mn626
Pb90
Cr150
Cd0.3
pH5.5 < pH ≤ 6.5
Table 2. Classification criteria of the Nemerow pollution index.
Table 2. Classification criteria of the Nemerow pollution index.
Pollution ClassPiPollution Degree PcomPollution Degree
IPi ≤ 1.0SafetyPCom ≤ 0.7Clean (safety)
II1.0 < Pi ≤ 2.0Slight pollution0.7 < PCom ≤ 1.0Clean (threshold)
III2.0 < Pi ≤ 3.0Moderate pollution1.0 < PCom ≤ 2.0Slight pollution
IV3.0 < PiStrong pollution2.0 < PCom ≤ 3.0Moderate pollution
V PCom > 3.0Strong pollution
Table 3. Nemerow pollution index of heavy metals in the Sanqi and pine soils.
Table 3. Nemerow pollution index of heavy metals in the Sanqi and pine soils.
Pi (Zn) Pi(Cu) Pi (Mn) Pi (Pb) Pi (Cr) Pi (Cd) Pcom
Pn0.69 ± 0.004 c0.50 ± 0.006 b0.48 ± 0.002 b0.41 ± 0.013 c0.81 ± 0.007 b0.29 ± 0.001 b0.808 ± 0.008 d
MPA-B0.73 ± 0.005 b0.49 ± 0.003 c0.48 ± 0.002 a0.43 ± 0.011 b0.92 ± 0.009 a0.290 ± 0.001 b0.901 ± 0.004 b
MPA-R0.77 ± 0.006 a0.49 ± 0.004 c0.48 ± 0.002 a0.45 ±0.008 a0.92 ± 0.009 a0.29 ± 0.001 a0.971 ± 0.003 a
SPA-B0.62 ± 0.009 e0.52 ± 0.004 a0.39 ± 0.001 d0.38 ± 0.010 d0.83 ± 0.010 b0.28 ± 0.001 c0.858 ± 0.012 c
SPA-R0.64 ± 0.005 d0.50 ± 0.003 b0.44 ± 0.001 c0.40 ± 0.012 cd0.82 ± 0.008 b0.290 ± 0.001 b0.784 ± 0.010 e
Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 level.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, K.; Zhao, X.; Rui, R.; Li, Y.; Hei, J.; Yu, L.; Wang, S.; He, X. Effects of Sanqi Cultivation on Soil Fertility and Heavy Metal Content in the Sanqi–Pine Agroforestry System. Agronomy 2025, 15, 2123. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15092123

AMA Style

Liu K, Zhao X, Rui R, Li Y, Hei J, Yu L, Wang S, He X. Effects of Sanqi Cultivation on Soil Fertility and Heavy Metal Content in the Sanqi–Pine Agroforestry System. Agronomy. 2025; 15(9):2123. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15092123

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Keyu, Xiaoyan Zhao, Rui Rui, Yue Li, Jingying Hei, Longfeng Yu, Shu Wang, and Xiahong He. 2025. "Effects of Sanqi Cultivation on Soil Fertility and Heavy Metal Content in the Sanqi–Pine Agroforestry System" Agronomy 15, no. 9: 2123. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15092123

APA Style

Liu, K., Zhao, X., Rui, R., Li, Y., Hei, J., Yu, L., Wang, S., & He, X. (2025). Effects of Sanqi Cultivation on Soil Fertility and Heavy Metal Content in the Sanqi–Pine Agroforestry System. Agronomy, 15(9), 2123. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15092123

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop