Next Article in Journal
Maize Seed Variety Classification Based on Hyperspectral Imaging and a CNN-LSTM Learning Framework
Next Article in Special Issue
From First Frost to Last Snow: Tracking the Microclimate Evolution of Greenhouses Across North China’s Winter Spectrum
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling of Droplet Deposition in Air-Assisted Spraying
Previous Article in Special Issue
Intensify or Alleviate? Measurement of the Impact of China’s Facility Agriculture on Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Comparative Analysis Based on Cucumber Industry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Comparative Analysis of Different Growing Conditions of Mulberry (cv. Kokuso 21): From Conventional Nursery to Soil-Less Technique

by
Ecaterina-Daniela Baciu
1,
Ileana Miclea
1,*,
Mihaiela Cornea-Cipcigan
2,
Gabriela-Maria Baci
1,
Horaţiu Dezmirean
3,
Adela Ramona Moise
1,
Victorița Bonta
1,
Floricuta Ranga
4,
Otilia Bobiș
1 and
Daniel Severus Dezmirean
1
1
Faculty of Animal Science and Biotechnologies, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3
Faculty of Horticulture and Business in Rural Development, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
4
Faculty of Food Science and Technology, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2025, 15(7), 1584; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15071584
Submission received: 4 June 2025 / Revised: 25 June 2025 / Accepted: 26 June 2025 / Published: 28 June 2025

Abstract

Mulberry is an important plant not only for sericulture but also for the food and pharmaceutical industries due to its rich biochemical profile. However, in temperate climates, its cultivation is limited to the warm season. This study investigates the feasibility of year-round mulberry production using soil-less cultivation techniques. The Kokuso 21 variety was selected, and propagation was initiated from seeds in three different environments: conventional soil beds, an aeroponic system, and in vitro culture using Murashige-Skoog medium. Growth parameters, including plants’ total length, number of internodes, and internode spacing, were measured and correlated with the plants’ biochemical composition, providing new insights into this underexplored mulberry cultivar. Among the tested techniques, the aeroponic system demonstrated the most promising results, with immediate applicability in field conditions, while in vitro propagation remains a viable method for germplasm conservation. These findings indicate that the Kokuso 21 mulberry variety can be successfully cultivated in a controlled, soil-less environment for continuous leaf production throughout the year.

1. Introduction

Mulberry trees (Morus spp.) are deciduous woody plants recognized for their high leaf yield, short gestation period, and remarkable adaptability to a wide range of environmental conditions [1]. Owing to their resilience, mulberries have been widely cultivated and studied, particularly for their nutritional and pharmaceutical properties [2]. Historically valued in Asia and beyond, mulberries have served as both food and medicine, with the leaves traditionally used in herbal remedies and Ajurveda [3]. The nutritional profile of mulberry fruit varies by cultivar and maturity stage, but it typically includes essential fatty acids, amino acids, vitamins, minerals, and bioactive compounds like anthocyanins, rutin, quercetin, chlorogenic acid, and polysaccharides [4]. Increasing scientific interest has emerged due to these compounds’ demonstrated antioxidant, neuroprotective, anti-tumor, antihyperglycemic, and other health-promoting effects in both in vitro and in vivo models [5]. Furthermore, different parts of the mulberry tree (fruits, leaves, roots, and twigs) exhibit distinct pharmacological properties [6]. For example, black mulberries are especially rich in anthocyanins such as cyanidin-3-O-glucoside, while leaves contain quercetin, kaempferol, and chlorogenic acid. Roots and twigs are sources of morusin, a prenylated flavonoid [7]. These characteristics position mulberry as a promising raw material for developing functional foods with various health benefits and applications in the nutraceutical and pharmaceutical industries [7].
To harness these properties effectively, understanding optimal growth conditions is essential. Traditionally, mulberries have been propagated in soil-based nursery systems under specific climatic and soil requirements: moderate temperatures (around 26 °C), altitudes up to 4000 m, and well-drained, loamy-clayey soils with a pH of 6.2–6.8 [8]. However, advances in agricultural technology have introduced soil-less systems like hydroponics, aeroponics, and in vitro culture, which offer potential for higher resource efficiency and plant productivity. For instance, hydroponically grown mulberries have shown improved leaf palatability and increased 1-deoxynojirimycin (DNJ) content, though with reduced polyphenol levels compared to field-grown counterparts [9]. Similarly, the aeroponic cultivation of V-1 mulberry resulted in superior root and shoot growth relative to conventional methods [10,11], while in vitro techniques have proven effective for propagating diverse mulberry genotypes [11,12,13].
Building on these developments, the present study investigates for the first time the growth of Morus latifolia var. Kokuso 21 under two soil-less propagation systems: aeroponics and in vitro culture. This cultivar is known for its strong cold tolerance (−34 °C), vigorous growth, and large, nutrient-rich leaves that are ideal for silkworm rearing, making it a valuable variety for Romania’s temperate-continental climate. The study aims to compare the morphological parameters and individual phenolic profiles of Kokuso 21 propagated under aeroponic and in vitro conditions against conventional nursery-grown plants. Among the tested methods, aeroponics showed the most promising outcomes in terms of plant vigor and viability, while in vitro propagation proved effective for genotype conservation, albeit with slightly lower phenolic accumulation. To our knowledge, this is the first report evaluating Kokuso 21 using both aeroponic and in vitro propagation systems in parallel, filling a key gap in current research, which has largely focused on Morus alba and Morus nigra.
While previous studies have made important strides in improving mulberry cultivation for sericulture, few have correlated propagation strategies with biochemical profiling, particularly regarding phenolic compound accumulation. For example, Gil-Martínez et al. (2022) enhanced phenolic content in M. alba roots via in vitro techniques [14], but their scope was limited to root systems. Meng et al. (2025) analyzed post-harvest changes in phenolic profiles during fermentation [15], and Karabulut and Saraçoğlu (2022) studied rooting in M. nigra using growth regulators [16], without exploring metabolite content or alternative propagation methods. In contrast, our study offers a novel, multidimensional perspective by evaluating morphological development and individual phenolic composition under different propagation conditions. This integrated approach provides new insights into how cultivation techniques can influence the functional qualities of lesser-studied mulberry cultivars such as M. latifolia var. Kokuso 21.

2. Materials and Methods

The present study rigorously investigates conventional and aeroponic cultivation methods for mulberry, implemented within a controlled greenhouse facility in Cluj-Napoca, Romania (46°46′ N, 23°36′ E) and established as a case study. The area experiences a temperate continental climate, characterized by four distinct seasons. Average annual temperatures range from 8 °C to 10 °C, with summer highs reaching around 26 °C and winter lows dropping below freezing. Annual precipitation averages approximately 600–700 mm, with rainfall distributed relatively evenly throughout the year. The greenhouse and in vitro propagation laboratory settings allowed for partial control of temperature, which was set for 22 °C and light (12 h light/12 h dark cycle), reducing the influence of external climatic variability on plant development.
Open-pollinated seeds of Morus latifolia cv. Kokuso 21 was procured from mature fruits obtained from the Global Centre of Excellence for Advanced Research in Sericulture and Promotion of Silk Production, affiliated with the University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Romania. The seeds underwent air-drying and were stored in a sealed bag at room temperature in the dark until they were used. The experimental phase started in January 2023, with the germination of seeds, while the measurements were made in July 2023. For each condition, 32 randomized plants were collected and measured to provide a reliable comparison of how the different growth systems influence plant morphology. The average number of true leaves at the time of measurements was 26 for conventional, 22 for aeroponic, and 12 for in vitro conditions.

2.1. Mulberry Grown Using Conventional Agricultural Methods

Peat substrate was used for germinating mulberry seeds in specialized alveolar tubes containing 406 cells, each measuring 17 × 17 mm. The germination rate ranged from 74.9% to 78.3% per alveolar tube, with an average value of 76.6%. Every 4 weeks, the plants received two complementary nutrient solutions. On one hand, a complex foliar fertilizer (Synergizer 8-32-4) was applied, containing micro and macro elements specifically designed to balance the nutritional ratio of plants and enhance crop yields, with the following components: total nitrogen (N) 8%; available phosphorus (P2O5) 32.0%; soluble potassium (K2O) 4.0%; Iron (Fe) 0.1%; Manganese (Mn) 0.1%; Zinc (Zn) 0.1%; and humic acids derived from leonardite 0.3%, in the form of a soluble concentrate. On the other hand, a light and quickly assimilable biostimulator (Delfan plus) was applied, which contains a well-proportioned mixture of 17 physiologically active and functional L-α essential amino acids resulting from protein hydrolysis. The biostimulator used is an ecological product, formulated with organic biomolecules of natural origin, and has the following composition: 24% free amino acids, 44% organic matter, 9% total nitrogen, 5.3% protein nitrogen, and 32.6% organic carbon.

2.2. Mulberry Grown Using Aeroponic System

For this experiment, rockwool cubes were used for germinating mulberry, and three Amazon-Twin Aeroponic Systems (Figure 1a,b) were used to suspend plant roots in a misting chamber filled with nutrients, fostering optimal growth conditions. This method provides plants with unrestricted access to oxygen, nutrients, and water. The system’s design includes a tank measuring 1600 mm in length, 673 mm in width, and 254 mm in height, along with chamber dimensions of 2 × 750 mm in length, 750 mm in width, and 140 mm in height, holding a total volume of 100 L of nutrient solution and 32 plants each system. The pump was running continuously at 60 psi, and the nozzles atomized the water into tiny droplets, increasing the surface area for better absorption by the plant roots. The aeroponic system was placed in the greenhouse, having the same temperature, humidity, and light conditions as the plants in soil pots. This setup ensured a steady supply of nutrients to the roots while allowing excess solution to drain back into the tank, thereby preventing waterlogging and the accumulation of nutrient salts. Consequently, plants experienced unhindered uptake of nutrients and oxygen, resulting in improved absorption of water and nutrients, ultimately leading to enhanced yields compared to traditional cultivation methods. The nutrient solution was the same as prepared for conventional growing.

2.3. Mulberry Grown Using In Vitro Technique

In vitro propagation of mulberry was conducted using the protocol developed by Sarkar et. al. (2022) [11], simplified. Seeds collected in the same year were sterilized by soaking them in a 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite solution for 26 min, followed by 3 rinses with sterile distilled water. The seeds were set for germination on Murashide–Skoog (MS) medium (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), using original recipe [17] with an addition of sucrose (3% w/v) and agar (0.8%), for approximately four weeks until at least two foliage layers had developed. The leaves, together with cotyledons and hypocotyls, were subjected to a preculture on 0.5 mg/L TDZ-supplemented MS medium for expansion for another five weeks. Further, for elongation of regenerated individual shoots, an elongation medium containing MS, sucrose (3%, w/v), agar (0.8%) and supplemented with 6-Benzylaminopurine (BAP) 1 mg/L, gibberellic acid (GA3) 1.5 mg/L, AgNO3 (2 mg/L), putrescine (1 mg/L), AC (0.2%), and CaCl2 (515 mg/L) was prepared. Lastly, rooting was promoted through indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) 2 mg/L in AC-supplemented medium (Figure 2).

2.4. Identification and Quantification of Individual Phenolic Compounds

Individual phenolic compounds were identified and quantified using the HPLC-DAD-ESI+ method, designed and validated at the Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Cluj-Napoca [18,19,20]. For sample preparation, 1 g of each sample (powdered leaves) was mixed with 10 mL of acidified ethanol, vortexed, and sonicated for 15 min, followed by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 20 °C. This extraction was repeated three times, and the combined supernatants were filtered through a Chromafil Xtra PA-45/13 nylon filter (0.45 µm pore size). A 20 µL aliquot of the filtrate was injected into an Agilent 1200 HPLC system equipped with a quaternary pump, degasser, autosampler, UV–VIS photodiode array detector, and an Agilent 6110 single-quadrupole mass spectrometer. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Kinetex XB C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm; Phenomenex, USA) using a gradient elution program with mobile phases consisting of water and acetonitrile, both containing 0.1% acetic acid. The gradient started at 5% B and changed as follows: 0–2 min: 5%, 2–18 min: 5–40%, 18–20 min: 40–90%, 20–24 min: 90%, 24–25 min: 90–5%, and 25–30 min: 5%. The flow rate was set at 0.5 mL/min, the column temperature at 25 °C, and spectral data were recorded in the 200–600 nm range, with chromatograms monitored at 280 and 340 nm. Mass spectrometry was performed in positive ionization mode under the following conditions: 3000 V capillary voltage, 350 °C temperature, 7 L/min nitrogen flow, 100 V fragmentor voltage, and an m/z scan range of 120–1200. Data acquisition and analysis were conducted using Agilent ChemStation software (Rev B.02.01—SR2). For the calibration curves, hydroxycinnamic acids were quantified as chlorogenic acid equivalents using a calibration curve with the equation y = 22.585x − 36.728 (R2 = 0.9937), LOD = 0.41 μg/mL, LOQ = 1.64 μg/mL. For flavonols, the calibration curve with rutin was used: y = 26.935x − 33.784 (R2 = 0.9981), LOD = 0.21 μg/mL, LOQ = 0.84 μg/mL. Lastly, anthocyanins were quantified as cyanidin equivalents: y = 55.789x − 143.21 (R2 = 0.9951), LOD = 0.36 μg/mL, LOQ = 1.44 μg/mL. Identification of phenolic compounds was based on retention times, UV-VIS spectra, and mass spectral data, supported by references from the scientific literature and the Phenol-Explorer database.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analyses were assessed using SPSS software (version 19). The data are represented as means ± standard deviation. Statistical difference between determinations was evaluated using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey HSD test, p < 0.05. Principal component analysis (PCA) was employed to visualise trends associated with conventional growth and soilless culture, and was performed using the FactoMiner factoextra package. Heatmap has been employed to point out the resemblances and distinctions in the development and biochemical characterization of mulberries according to their conventional growth or soil-less technique, using the R program (version 2024.12.1).

3. Results

3.1. Morphological Parameters of Plants

Morphological parameters such as plant length, root length, stem length, number of nodes, internode length, and number of shoots are essential indicators of plant growth and development. This study examines these parameters in plants grown under three different conditions: conventional growth, aeroponic growth, and in vitro growth. For each condition, 32 randomized plants were collected 6 months after germination and measured to provide a reliable comparison of how the different growth systems influence plant morphology. (Table 1).
In conventional growth conditions, plants exhibited moderate development, with an average plant length of 76.58 ± 5.72 cm. These plants had a relatively balanced structure, with a stem length of 53.18 ± 6.86 cm and an average of 16.03 ± 1.33 nodes. The root length measured 23.40 ± 5.59 cm, which was notably shorter than in aeroponic conditions, suggesting limited root expansion in soil-based systems [21].
Plants grown under aeroponic conditions showed the most vigorous development. They reached the greatest plant length, averaging 108.36 ± 12.56 cm, and also developed the longest roots at 44.71 ± 9.25 cm. Stem length was also highest in this group at 63.65 ± 6.84 cm, along with an increased number of internodes (18.06 ± 1.52). These results suggest that aeroponic growth, likely due to improved oxygenation and nutrient delivery, supports optimal development of both aerial and root systems [22]
In contrast, in vitro-grown plants displayed significantly reduced morphological parameters. The average plant length was only 7.14 ± 4.54 cm, with a root length of 1.27 ± 2.88 cm and a stem length of 5.87 ± 2.14 cm. The standard deviation in root length is more than twice the mean, which indicates very high variability in the data. This phenomenon is explained by the fact that only 7 out of 32 plants developed, contributing to a markedly skewed distribution of the data. In terms of the number of internodes, in vitro plants had fewer internodes (5.19 ± 1.42) and shorter internode length (1.34 ± 0.71 cm). However, they produced a higher number of shoots (2.59 ± 1.04) compared to the single shoot observed in both conventional and aeroponic systems. This elevated shoot production may be attributed to hormonal influences typical in tissue culture environments, which often promote shoot proliferation over elongation or root development [23]
Overall, the data highlight significant differences in plant morphology depending on the growth conditions, with aeroponic systems showing the most favorable results for comprehensive plant development. According to the PCA, the first two components explained 74.4% of the total variation, highlighting that the mulberries grown under aeroponic conditions proved to have dissimilarities in terms of morphology. Following the quadrants, the upper left emphasizes samples represented by lower height, stem and root length, and internode distance, particularly in samples 27, 29, 31, and 32, whereas samples 10 and 18 presented similarities in terms of growth development. The following lower left quadrant, grouped in a closer proximity, the mulberries, which presented similar developmental outcomes with slightly higher plant and stem lengths as observed in the abovementioned samples. Out of the mulberries that grouped in the present quadrant, sample 8 proved to be distinct due to the relatively higher internode distance compared with the others. The following quadrant (lower right) emphasizes the samples with an elevated level of growth, including 9, 11, 14, 19, and 24. Among these mulberries, sample 5 has been distinguished from the others due to the relatively high recorded stem length, internodes, and distance. The last quadrant grouped the samples that proved to have the most significant and positive developmental outcomes, in terms of morphology, namely samples 2, 3, 4, 15, 17, and 26. Out of these, although sample 23 presented relatively lower internode distances, a significant positive developmental outcome has been recorded under aeroponic conditions (Figure 3).
Regarding conventional growth, the first two components of the PCA explained 74.9% of the overall variance and grouped the mulberries according to their growth development. Therefore, the first quadrant (i.e., upper left) emphasizes the samples with the lowest developmental stage in terms of growth and internode number and distance, including 1, 4, 10, 18, 23, and 28. Among these, sample 23 was observed to have the lowest distance between internodes and relatively low plant height and stem length. The following quadrant (lower left) grouped the samples with similar and lower plant height, and relatively higher root length. Among these samples, two mulberries, namely 17 and 30, proved to be distinct due to their relatively high root length. The subsequent quadrant comprises mulberries with the highest growth development, root length, and internode distance, particularly in samples 6, 8, 11–16, and 29. The upper right quadrant encompasses samples that, although presenting elevated developmental stages, a relatively increased stem length and number of internodes have been recorded, particularly in samples 21 and 32 (Figure 4).
Regarding the in vitro growth evaluation (Figure 5), significant discrepancies have been recorded as compared with the conventional techniques; the first components comprised an overall variation of 74.5%. The first quadrant (upper left) highlights the samples that presented significant and positive growth development, namely 1, 7, 11, 14, 15, and 18. In a proximate position, samples 21 and 22 presented relatively lower plant height and stem length, with a moderate number of shoots. Conversely, a relatively higher distance between internodes has been observed. Overall, these mulberries presented a moderate development, number of internodes, and root length. The subsequent quadrant (lower left) underlines samples 16, 19, and 20, which presented relatively increased development, root and stem length, but also a higher distance between internodes. Nonetheless, these mulberries prove to have a lower number of shoots and leaves. The remaining samples were grouped in the outer right quadrants due to their similarities in terms of relatively lower development, internode number, and distance. Furthermore, these mulberries encompassed a small amount of leaves and shoots. This analysis provides valuable insights for optimizing crop production strategies in both conventional and soilless systems.

3.2. Identification and Quantification of Individual Phenolic Compounds

Phenolic compounds are a varied group of secondary metabolites widely recognized for their antioxidant properties and potential health benefits. In plants, these compounds play vital roles in growth, development, and defense against environmental stressors. The method of cultivation can significantly influence the biosynthesis and accumulation of these compounds. Table 2 presents a comparative analysis of individual phenolic compounds identified and quantified in plants grown under three different conditions: conventional, aeroponic, and in vitro systems. The retention time (Rt), UV absorption maxima (λ_max), and mass-to-charge ratio ([M + H]+) are provided to assist in compound identification. This data enables an evaluation of how cultivation techniques impact phenolic content and composition.
The most abundant phenolic compound across all growth conditions is 5-Caffeoylquinic acid (Chlorogenic acid), with concentrations of 12.66 mg/g in conventionally grown plants, 13.04 mg/g in aeroponically grown plants, and 1.86 mg/g in in vitro cultures. This suggests that both conventional and aeroponic systems are effective in maintaining high levels of this compound, which is known for its strong antioxidant activity. In contrast, its significantly lower presence in in vitro cultures may indicate reduced biosynthetic activity or modifications in metabolic pathways under artificial growth conditions. These differences highlight the significant role of cultivation methods in influencing phenolic compound synthesis and may provide guidance for optimizing production in both commercial and therapeutic contexts. These findings align with other studies reported in the past years.
The Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA) has been employed to assess the similarities and discrepancies between the conventional nursery and soil-less techniques and the accumulation of biochemical composition. The results showed distinct clusters indicating different patterns in growth and biochemical composition between mulberries grown conventionally compared to those grown using soil-less techniques (Figure 6).
In agreement with the cluster position, it appears that the in vitro culture proved to have a detrimental effect on the development of mulberries, but also on the accumulation of valuable bioactive compounds. Nonetheless, a moderate accumulation of neochlorogenic acid has been recorded. The following cluster comprises both the conventional and the aeroponic evaluated systems. As can be visualized, the mulberries grown under the conventional method accumulated elevated levels of bioactive compounds, particularly rutin, quercetin derivatives, and kaempferol-rhamnoside. Concerning growth characteristics, a moderate development has been observed in plant height and stem length. In opposition, it has been emphasized that aeroponic conditions prove to be optimal growth techniques in terms of growth development as observed by the increased plant height, stem length, and above all, sustaining and accelerating the rooting process. This analysis provides valuable insights for optimizing mulberry cultivation methods to enhance growth and biochemical properties. This suggests that while growth techniques may influence certain characteristics, there are also other factors at play in determining the overall development of mulberries.

4. Discussion

The results of this study demonstrate a clear advantage of aeroponic systems over conventional greenhouse and in vitro cultivation methods for the propagation of mulberry. Among the observed parameters—root development, biomass accumulation, and overall plant vigor—aeroponic cultivation consistently yielded superior outcomes. These findings align with recent studies, such as those by Nishchitha et al. (2023), which also reported enhanced rooting and growth characteristics in mulberry saplings propagated through aeroponics [10]. The physiological benefits of this method, particularly the increased oxygenation of the root zone and the efficient, targeted delivery of nutrients, likely underpin these results. Unlike soil-based, aeroponics ensures that plant roots are suspended in air and misted intermittently with nutrient solutions, promoting faster root initiation, greater nutrient absorption, and more robust overall development.
In vitro and aeroponic cultivation methods have shown significant potential in enhancing plant development. Numerous studies have demonstrated that in vitro propagation can lead to increased secondary metabolite production in various crops. For instance, in vitro propagated Rheum rhabarbarum (rhubarb) showed high proliferation rates and substantial levels of resveratrol (229.4–371.7 μg/g dry weight), along with excellent rooting efficiency and genetic stability [24]. Similar results were reported for Cichorium intybus (chicory), where cultures enriched with indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and benzylaminopurine (BAP) promoted the production of phenolic compounds, particularly under abiotic stress conditions [25,26,27,28]. In contrast to these trends, our study on mulberry revealed that in vitro propagation resulted in lower phenolic compound accumulation compared to aeroponic cultivation. This finding underscores the species-specific nature of metabolic responses to cultivation conditions. Unlike rhubarb, chicory, or Lycium species, mulberry may not receive the necessary physiological cues or environmental stimuli in vitro to effectively trigger phenolic biosynthesis. On the other hand, the results show that in vitro-grown Kokuso 21 plants exhibited a significantly higher number of shoots (2.59 ± 1.04), reflecting the strong influence of exogenous plant growth regulators typically used in tissue culture. However, this enhanced shoot multiplication came at the cost of markedly lower phenolic content, with 5-Caffeoylquinic acid levels reaching only 1.86 mg/g, substantially lower than in plants grown under conventional (12.66 mg/g) and aeroponic (13.04 mg/g) conditions. This contrast suggests a physiological trade-off, where hormonal conditions favoring shoot initiation may suppress secondary metabolite biosynthesis, likely due to altered metabolic priorities or enzyme expression. Complementary, the aeroponic system, which offers a well-aerated, stress-responsive environment, may better simulate natural conditions conducive to phenolic accumulation in mulberry. These results highlight the importance of tailoring propagation and cultivation systems to the specific metabolic and developmental characteristics of each crop species when the goal is to optimize the production of health-promoting secondary metabolites.
From a broader perspective, these findings contribute to the advancement of sustainable and high-efficiency agricultural practices. Aeroponic systems, due to their design, require significantly less water and eliminate the need for traditional growing substrates, making them highly suitable for regions with limited water availability or declining soil health. The controlled environment intrinsic to aeroponic setups allows for standardization in plant production, reduces susceptibility to soil-borne pathogens, and enables year-round cultivation. This positions aeroponics as a promising tool for the commercial propagation of mulberry, especially in urban and peri-urban settings, where vertical farming and space efficiency are becoming increasingly important.
Moreover, while aeroponics offers distinct advantages for rapid and scalable production, in vitro propagation techniques play an equally critical yet complementary role in the context of mulberry cultivation and conservation. Although more labor-intensive and technically demanding, in vitro propagation is invaluable for the preservation and multiplication of genetically important or rare mulberry germplasm. Other studies have also shown successful micropropagation of Morus alba cultivars using shoot-tip culture, achieving high multiplication rates and satisfactory rooting outcomes under sterile conditions [11,12,29]. In vitro methods play a crucial role in producing disease-free planting material and offer a dependable strategy for the long-term conservation of genetic resources, thereby preserving the genetic diversity of mulberry. This is particularly vital for breeding programs, biotechnological research, and the development of resilient crop populations capable of withstanding climate change and emerging pests. Given the wide array of bioactivities exhibited by mulberry, the data presented in this study represent a significant advancement not only for agriculture but also for biotechnology. Mulberry is especially noted for its antioxidative, anticancer, antidiabetic, and hepatoprotective properties [11]. These diverse health benefits underscore the growing demand for expanded mulberry cultivation, exploration of alternative growing techniques, and maximizing the production of valuable health-promoting compounds such as phenols, anthocyanins, polysaccharides, and flavonoids.
Together, the results of this study suggest that aeroponic systems may be best suited for high-efficiency commercial production of mulberry, whereas in vitro techniques should be prioritized for germplasm preservation, elite cultivar maintenance, and the propagation of genetically sensitive lines. To integrate aeroponics and in vitro systems into a commercial setup, a synergistic model can be established combining vertical farming, pharmacological compound production, and genetic conservation. Aeroponics is ideal for vertical farming, enabling space-efficient, year-round cultivation of Kokuso 21 mulberry in stacked layers under controlled conditions, producing nutrient-rich biomass for sericulture and industrial use. This system can be optimized to enhance specific phytochemicals, supporting pharmacological compounds, by using elicitors or nutrient adjustments to boost metabolite production. In parallel, in vitro culture serves as a foundation for maintaining a healthy gene pool, allowing for disease-free micropropagation, genotype conservation, and the rapid scaling of elite clones for commercial use. The integration of both approaches could therefore support a more resilient and dynamic mulberry cultivation system that addresses both short-term productivity and long-term sustainability.
Looking ahead, future research should explore the optimization of environmental parameters within aeroponic systems, such as misting intervals, nutrient formulations, and light regimes, to further enhance plant performance. The incorporation of precision agriculture technologies, including sensor-based monitoring and automated nutrient delivery, could improve system efficiency and scalability. Long-term studies evaluating the economic viability and sustainability of aeroponic systems for mulberry, especially under commercial production conditions, will be essential. Moreover, genotype-specific responses to aeroponic cultivation warrant investigation, as different mulberry cultivars may vary in their adaptability to soilless systems. Another promising avenue is the assessment of secondary metabolite production in aeroponically and in vitro grown mulberry plants, which could have implications for pharmaceutical and nutraceutical applications.

5. Conclusions

Aeroponically grown Kokuso 21 plants demonstrated the most vigorous development, achieving an average plant height of 108.36 ± 12.56 cm, 41% taller than plants grown conventionally (76.58 ± 5.72 cm). Additionally, aeroponic plants developed root systems nearly twice as long (44.71 ± 9.25 cm) as those in soil (23.40 ± 5.59 cm), indicating enhanced underground biomass likely due to superior oxygen and nutrient availability. Although in vitro propagation resulted in significantly shorter plants (7.14 ± 4.54 cm), it produced the highest shoot proliferation rate (2.59 ± 1.04), emphasizing its utility for rapid multiplication and germplasm maintenance. However, in vitro conditions led to a drastic reduction in phenolic accumulation, with chlorogenic acid levels nearly 85% lower than in the other two systems. These findings represent the first parallel evaluation of Kokuso 21 under aeroponic and in vitro systems, revealing critical physiological trade-offs and establishing aeroponics as the most effective approach for robust plant development and bioactive compound retention in temperate climates.
In conclusion, the superior performance of mulberry under aeroponic conditions underscores the potential of this technology to transform conventional propagation practices. At the same time, in vitro techniques offer critical support for the preservation and careful manipulation of genetic resources. Together, these approaches can be strategically combined to support a sustainable, high-performing, and resilient mulberry cultivation framework suitable for both commercial and conservation purposes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.-D.B., I.M. and D.S.D.; methodology, E.-D.B., M.C.-C., I.M., H.D., V.B. and F.R.; software, M.C.-C., V.B. and F.R.; validation, E.-D.B., O.B. and D.S.D.; formal analysis, E.-D.B., M.C.-C., A.R.M., G.-M.B., V.B. and F.R.; investigation, E.-D.B., I.M., M.C.-C., G.-M.B., V.B. and F.R.; resources, E.-D.B., A.R.M., O.B., H.D. and D.S.D.; data curation, M.C.-C., A.R.M., O.B. and D.S.D.; writing—original draft preparation, E.-D.B., M.C.-C., G.-M.B., V.B. and F.R.; writing—review and editing, I.M., A.R.M., O.B. and D.S.D.; visualization, E.-D.B., M.C.-C. and G.-M.B.; supervision, I.M., O.B. and D.S.D.; project administration, E.-D.B., A.R.M. and D.S.D.; funding acquisition, A.R.M. and D.S.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Agenția Pentru Finanțarea Investițiilor Rurale prin PNDR, Programul Național pentru Dezvoltare Rurală 2014–2020 pentru acordarea ajutorului financiar nerambursabil/Măsura 16.1 și 16.1a (grant number C161A0000011861300012).

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Hăbeanu, M.; Gheorghe, A.; Mihalcea, T. Silkworm Bombyx Mori—Sustainability and Economic Opportunity, Particularly for Romania. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Przeor, M. How Does In Vitro Digestion Change the Amount of Phenolics in Morus alba L. Leaf? Analysis of Preparations and Infusions. Metabolites 2024, 14, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Brij, K.S.; Mohammad, A.K.; Dhar, A.; Baqual, F.M.; Bindroo, B.B. Approaches to Industrial Exploitation of Mulberry (Mulberry sp.) Fruits. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 2010, 18, 83–99. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yu, Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, B.; Wang, J.; Shi, X.; Huang, J.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, Z. Nutritional and Functional Components of Mulberry Leaves from Different Varieties: Evaluation of Their Potential as Food Materials. Int. J. Food Prop. 2018, 21, 1495–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yuan, Q.; Zhao, L. The Mulberry (Morus Alba L.) Fruit—A Review of Characteristic Components and Health Benefits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 10383–10394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Baci, G.M.; Baciu, E.D.; Cucu, A.A.; Muscă, A.S.; Giurgiu, A.I.; Moise, A.R.; Zăhan, M.; Dezmirean, D.S. Sericultural By-Products: The Potential for Alternative Therapy in Cancer Drug Design. Molecules 2023, 28, 850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Memete, A.R.; Timar, A.V.; Vuscan, A.N.; Miere, F.; Venter, A.C.; Vicas, S.I. Phytochemical Composition of Different Botanical Parts of Morus Species, Health Benefits and Application in Food Industry. Plants 2022, 11, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Parida, S.; Rayaguru, K. Mulberry Cultivation And Its Phytochemical Benefits: A Review. J. Nat. Remedies 2020, 21, 33–48. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sakurai, M.; Sato, S.; Fukushima, T.; Konishi, T. Characteristics of Morus Alba L. Cultured by In-Room Hydroponics. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 91–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nishchitha, G.; Bhaskar, B.; Bharathi, V.; Anusha, H. Aeroponic System Is Boon for Rainfed Mulberry Cultivation and Enhance Productivity. Pharma Innov. J. 2023, 12, 4480–4484. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sarkar, T.; Ravindra, K.N.; Doss, S.G.; Kumar, P.M.P.; Tewary, P. In Vitro Regeneration of Mulberry Plants from Seedling Explants of Morus Indica Cv. G4 through Direct Organogenesis. Trees-Struct. Funct. 2022, 36, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dubey, V.; Khan, S.; Shah, K.W.; Raghuwanshi, R.K. Standardization of Protocol for In Vitro Micropropagation of Morus alba L., An Important Economical and Medicinal Plant. Pharm. Biosci. J. 2020, 8, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Litwińczuk, W.; Jacek, B. Micropropagation of Mountain Mulberry (Morus bombycis Koidz.) ‘Kenmochi’ on Cytokinin-Free Medium. Plants 2020, 9, 1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gil-Martínez, A.; Lozano-Pérez, A.A.; Pérez-Tornero, O.; Pérez-Jiménez, M. Use of Mulberry (Morus alba L.) Root Culture to Improve the Production of Bioactive Compounds. In ISHS Acta Horticulturae 1359: XXXI International Horticultural Congress (IHC2022): International Symposium on In Vitro Technology and Micropropagated Plant; International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS): Bierbeek, Belgium, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  15. Meng, C.; Xie, J.; Chen, J.; Xuan, J.; Zeng, Z.; Lai, M.; Kang, X.; Li, J.; Liu, G.; Tu, J.; et al. Fermentation of Pediococcus Pentosaceus JC30 Improves Phytochemical, Flavor Characteristics and Antioxidant Activity of Mulberry Leaves. Molecules 2025, 30, 1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Karabulut, N.S.; Saraçoğlu, O. The Effects of Cinnamic Acid and IBA Treatments on the Rooting of Wood Cuttings of Black Mulberry (Morus nigra L.). Turk. J. Food Agric. Sci. 2022, 4, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Murasnige, T.; Skoog, F. A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Agsays with Tohaoco Tissue Cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. But, A.E.; Pop, R.M.; Binsfeld, G.F.; Ranga, F.; Orăsan, M.S.; Cecan, A.D.; Morar, I.I.; Chera, E.I.; Bonci, T.I.; Usatiuc, L.O.; et al. The Phytochemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Matricaria recutita Blossoms and Zingiber officinale Rhizome Ethanol Extracts. Nutrients 2025, 17, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Usatiuc, L.-O.; Pârvu, M.; Pop, R.M.; Uifălean, A.; Vălean, D.; Szabo, C.-E.; Țicolea, M.; Cătoi, F.A.; Ranga, F.; Pârvu, A.E. Phytochemical Profile and Antidiabetic, Antioxidant, and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Gypsophila paniculata Ethanol Extract in Rat Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetes Mellitus. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Teleky, B.E.; Mitrea, L.; Plamada, D.; Nemes, S.A.; Călinoiu, L.F.; Pascuta, M.S.; Varvara, R.A.; Szabo, K.; Vajda, P.; Szekely, C.; et al. Development of Pectin and Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)-Based Active Packaging Enriched with Itaconic Acid and Apple Pomace-Derived Antioxidants. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Taiz, L.; Zeiger, E. Plant Physiology, 5th ed.; Sinauer Associates, Inc.: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lakhiar, I.A.; Gao, J.; Syed, T.N.; Chandio, F.A.; Buttar, N.A. Modern Plant Cultivation Technologies in Agriculture under Controlled Environment: A Review on Aeroponics. J. Plant Interact. 2018, 13, 338–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. George, E.F.; Hall, M.A.; De Klerk, G.-J. Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture, 3rd ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  24. Clapa, D.; Borsai, O.; Hârța, M.; Bonta, V.; Szabo, K.; Coman, V.; Bobiș, O. Micropropagation, Genetic Fidelity and Phenolic Compound Production of Rheum rhabarbarum L. Plants 2020, 9, 656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Abas, Y.A.; Eroğlu, A.; Dalar, A.; Türker, M.; Ozdemir, F.A.; Sołowski, G. Phenolic Compound Production Increased In Vitro Regenerated Cichorium intybus L. Appl. Biosci. 2023, 2, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ahmed, M.E.A.E. In Vitro Propagation and Improving Accumulation of Coumarin in Lycium barbarum, a Rare Plant in the Flora of Egypt. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2022, 46, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vinothini, K.; Sri Devi, M.; Shalini, V.; Sekar, S.; Badoni Semwal, R.; Arjun, P.; Kumar Semwal, D. In Vitro Micropropagation, Total Phenolic Content and Comparative Antioxidant Activity of Different Extracts of Sesbania grandiflora (L.) Pers. Curr. Sci. 2017, 113, 1142–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Judickaitė, A.; Jankaitytė, E.; Ramanciuškas, E.; Degutytė-Fomins, L.; Naučienė, Z.; Kudirka, G.; Okumura, T.; Koga, K.; Shiratani, M.; Mildažienė, V.; et al. Effects of Seed Processing with Cold Plasma on Growth and Biochemical Traits of Stevia Rebaudiana Bertoni Under Different Cultivation Conditions: In Soil Versus Aeroponics. Plants 2025, 14, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Taha, H.; Ghazy, U.M.; Gabr, A.M.M.; EL-Kazzaz, A.A.A.; Ahmed, E.A.M.M.; Haggag, K.M. Optimization of In Vitro Culture Conditions Affecting Propagation of Mulberry Plant. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2020, 44, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Mulberry grown using conventional agriculture methods and the Amazon-Twin Aeroponic System; (b) Amazon-Twin Aeroponic System—product scheme (Source: plantgrowed.com).
Figure 1. (a) Mulberry grown using conventional agriculture methods and the Amazon-Twin Aeroponic System; (b) Amazon-Twin Aeroponic System—product scheme (Source: plantgrowed.com).
Agronomy 15 01584 g001
Figure 2. In vitro propagation of mulberry; (a,b) seed germination, (c) elongation, and (d) rooting. The scale bar in each photo represents 1 cm.
Figure 2. In vitro propagation of mulberry; (a,b) seed germination, (c) elongation, and (d) rooting. The scale bar in each photo represents 1 cm.
Agronomy 15 01584 g002
Figure 3. PCA for mulberries grown under aeroponic conditions. The first and second dimensions explained 47% and 27% of the total variation.
Figure 3. PCA for mulberries grown under aeroponic conditions. The first and second dimensions explained 47% and 27% of the total variation.
Agronomy 15 01584 g003
Figure 4. PCA for mulberries grown under conventional conditions. The first and second dimensions explained 46% and 28% of the total variation.
Figure 4. PCA for mulberries grown under conventional conditions. The first and second dimensions explained 46% and 28% of the total variation.
Agronomy 15 01584 g004
Figure 5. PCA for mulberries grown under in vitro conditions. The first and second dimensions explained 53% and 21% of the total variation.
Figure 5. PCA for mulberries grown under in vitro conditions. The first and second dimensions explained 53% and 21% of the total variation.
Agronomy 15 01584 g005
Figure 6. The hierarchical cluster analysis of the conventional nursery and soil-less techniques regarding the accumulation of biochemical composition.
Figure 6. The hierarchical cluster analysis of the conventional nursery and soil-less techniques regarding the accumulation of biochemical composition.
Agronomy 15 01584 g006
Table 1. Morphological parameters of plants under three growth conditions.
Table 1. Morphological parameters of plants under three growth conditions.
Conventional Growth Aeroponic Growth In Vitro Growth
Plant length (cm) 76.58 ± 5.72 b108.36 ± 12.56 a7.14 ± 4.54 c
Root length (cm) 23.40 ± 5.59 b44.71 ± 9.25 a1.27 ± 2.88 c
Stem length (cm) 53.18 ± 6.86 a63.65 ± 6.84 a5.87 ± 2.14 b
No. of internodes 16.03 ± 1.33 b18.06 ± 1.52 a5.19 ± 1.42 c
Internode length (cm) 4.40 ± 0.56 a4.27 ± 0.63 a1.34 ± 0.71 b
No. of shoots 1.00 ± 0.00 b1.00 ± 0.00 b2.59 ± 1.04 a
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Different superscript lowercase letters within each row indicate statistically significant differences between the samples at a confidence level of p < 0.05.
Table 2. Identification and quantification of individual phenolic compounds.
Table 2. Identification and quantification of individual phenolic compounds.
Rt
(min)
λmax
(nm)
[M + H]+
(m/z)
Phenolic CompoundConventional
Growth
(mg/g)
Aeroponic
Growth (mg/g)
In Vitro
Growth
(mg/g)
10.073303553-Caffeoylquinic acid
(Neochlorogenic acid)
0.21 a0.37 a0.33 a
11.773303555-Caffeoylquinic acid
(Chlorogenic acid)
12.66 a13.04 a1.86 b
15.27360.255611.303Quercetin-rutinoside (Rutin)2.73 a1.57 a0.12 b
15.89360.255465.303Quercetin-glucoside1.11 a0.76 a0.13 b
16.28350.260595.287Kaempferol-rutinoside0.04 a0.04 a0.03 a
16.47360.255551.303Quercetin-malonyl-glucoside2.87 a2.09 a0.16 b
16.97350.260449.287Kaempferol-glucoside0.78 a0.64 a0.08 a
17.41360.255793.303Quercetin-triglucoside1.08 a0.73 a0.09 a
17.76350.260535.287Kaempferol-malonyl-glucoside1.15 a1.04 a0.08 a
19.82360.255435.303Quercetin-xyloside0.08 a0.06 a0.02 a
21.11350.260433.287Kaempferol-rhamnoside0.28 a0.15 a0.02 a
Total phenolics 23 20.49 2.91
Different superscript lowercase letters within each row indicate statistically significant differences between the samples at a confidence level of p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baciu, E.-D.; Miclea, I.; Cornea-Cipcigan, M.; Baci, G.-M.; Dezmirean, H.; Moise, A.R.; Bonta, V.; Ranga, F.; Bobiș, O.; Dezmirean, D.S. A Comparative Analysis of Different Growing Conditions of Mulberry (cv. Kokuso 21): From Conventional Nursery to Soil-Less Technique. Agronomy 2025, 15, 1584. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15071584

AMA Style

Baciu E-D, Miclea I, Cornea-Cipcigan M, Baci G-M, Dezmirean H, Moise AR, Bonta V, Ranga F, Bobiș O, Dezmirean DS. A Comparative Analysis of Different Growing Conditions of Mulberry (cv. Kokuso 21): From Conventional Nursery to Soil-Less Technique. Agronomy. 2025; 15(7):1584. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15071584

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baciu, Ecaterina-Daniela, Ileana Miclea, Mihaiela Cornea-Cipcigan, Gabriela-Maria Baci, Horaţiu Dezmirean, Adela Ramona Moise, Victorița Bonta, Floricuta Ranga, Otilia Bobiș, and Daniel Severus Dezmirean. 2025. "A Comparative Analysis of Different Growing Conditions of Mulberry (cv. Kokuso 21): From Conventional Nursery to Soil-Less Technique" Agronomy 15, no. 7: 1584. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15071584

APA Style

Baciu, E.-D., Miclea, I., Cornea-Cipcigan, M., Baci, G.-M., Dezmirean, H., Moise, A. R., Bonta, V., Ranga, F., Bobiș, O., & Dezmirean, D. S. (2025). A Comparative Analysis of Different Growing Conditions of Mulberry (cv. Kokuso 21): From Conventional Nursery to Soil-Less Technique. Agronomy, 15(7), 1584. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15071584

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop