Next Article in Journal
Optimizing Water and Nitrogen Application to Furrow-Irrigated Summer Corn Using the AquaCrop Model
Previous Article in Journal
Optimizing Cropping Systems Using Biochar for Wheat Production Across Contrasting Seasons in Ethiopian Highland Agroecology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Plant Aux/IAA Gene Family: Significance in Growth, Development and Stress Responses

1
College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
2
Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
3
Gansu Key Laboratory of Crop Improvement & Germplasm Enhancement, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2025, 15(5), 1228; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15051228
Submission received: 7 April 2025 / Revised: 16 May 2025 / Accepted: 16 May 2025 / Published: 18 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Breeding and Genetics)

Abstract

:
Auxin plays a crucial role throughout the entire life cycle of plants. The auxin/indole-3-acetic acid (Aux/IAA) gene family serves as a negative regulator of auxin response and is one of the earliest auxin-responsive gene families. It regulates the expression of auxin-responsive genes by specifically binding to auxin response factors. This review summarizes the protein structural characteristics of the Aux/IAA gene family and its typical and atypical transduction mechanisms in auxin signaling. Additionally, it examines the role of Aux/IAA in regulating plant growth and development, as well as its function in modulating plant resistance to abiotic stress through hormonal signaling pathways. Our findings indicate that the Aux/IAA gene family plays a significant role in plant growth and development, as well as in abiotic stress resistance. However, research on the functional roles of the Aux/IAA gene family in crops such as rice, wheat, and maize remains relatively scarce. Furthermore, we identified key questions and proposed new research directions regarding the Aux/IAA gene family, aiming to provide insights for future research on plant hormone signaling and molecular breeding in crop design.

1. Introduction

Auxin is one of the most important plant hormones, playing a crucial regulatory role in growth and development throughout the entire life cycle of plants [1]. It regulates various processes, including tropic growth, tissue differentiation, cell division, elongation, organogenesis, morphogenesis, apical dominance, and flowering time [2,3,4]. Auxin can also interact with other signal transduction pathways to regulate extracellular developmental processes [5,6,7]. The Aux/IAA family, a gene family involved in early auxin response in plants, plays a significant role in the mechanism of auxin action. Aux/IAA proteins and auxin response factors (ARFs) form heterodimers and participate in various physiological processes via the auxin signaling pathway [8]. These proteins are identified as short-lived nuclear proteins. At low auxin levels, Aux/IAA proteins interact with ARFs to inhibit the activation of ARF target genes [9]. At high auxin levels, Aux/IAA proteins are ubiquitinated through interaction with TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE 1/auxin signaling F-box (TIR1/AFB) and subsequently degraded via the 26S proteasome pathway, releasing ARF activity [10]. Aux/IAA genes are specific to plants and have been identified in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), rice (Oryza sativa), maize (Zea mays), wheat (Triticum aestivum), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), and potato (Solanum tuberosum), but are absent in the genomes of bacteria, animals, or fungi [11]. While the biological functions of some Aux/IAA genes in Arabidopsis and rice have been reported, information is limited for crops such as maize, wheat, and potato [12,13]. With the development of multi-omics approaches, significant progress has been made in the research of Aux/IAA genes, although much remains unknown. In this article, we primarily provide an overview of research on Aux/IAA proteins in plants such as Arabidopsis, rice, and maize, aiming to facilitate future studies on plant hormone signal transduction and molecular breeding applications in crop science.

2. Structural Characteristics of Aux/IAA Proteins

Aux/IAA proteins consist of four conserved domains: Domains I, II, III, and IV (Figure 1). Domain I contains a conserved EAR (ERF-associated amphiphilic repression) module that binds to the co-repressor TPL (TOPLESS) [14]. Domain II is highly conserved and serves as one of the core components of auxin signaling transduction, featuring the amino acid core sequence “VGWPPV”. This domain mediates the degradation of Aux/IAA proteins through ubiquitin-mediated proteolytic enzymes, resulting in shorter half-lives [12]. Domain III exhibits a βαα composite fold region, where this binding domain plays a crucial role in mediating protein dimerization and facilitating DNA recognition [15]. Domain IV contains a GDVP motif, likely contributing to electrostatic interactions among proteins [16,17]. Domains III and IV, collectively referred to as Phox and Bem1 (PB1) domains, function as binding regions for ARF proteins, enabling interactions between Aux/IAA and ARF family proteins, thereby repressing the expression of auxin-responsive genes.

3. Auxin Signal Transduction Pathway

Auxin primarily regulates plant growth and development through coordinated signal transduction, anabolism, and polar transport within the plant [18,19]. The auxin transduction pathway is primarily mediated by three core signaling pathways: TIR1/AFB proteins, Aux/IAA transcriptional repressor proteins, and ARF transcription proteins [20,21,22]. In the presence of low or absent auxin concentrations, Aux/IAA proteins function as repressors. The PB1 domain interacts with the CTD domain of ARF, and Aux/IAA proteins recruit the related co-repressor TOPLESS (TPL) to inhibit ARF activity, thereby suppressing the expression of downstream target genes (Figure 2A) [23]. However, at high auxin concentrations, Aux/IAA proteins bind to auxin and TIR1 inhibitors, enhancing the ability of TIR1 to recognize Domain II in Aux/IAA proteins. Auxin binds to the SCF (Skp, Cullin, F-box containing complex) complex to form the SCFTIR1/AFBs ubiquitin ligase, triggering the ubiquitination and degradation of Aux/IAA via the 26S proteasome, which reduces the binding affinity to ARF proteins (Figure 2B) [24]. This subsequently activates the N-terminal DBD domain of ARF proteins, allowing them to bind to auxin response elements (AuxREs), which activate the expression of auxin-responsive downstream genes [25,26]. Throughout plant development, this signaling pathway regulates auxin-mediated processes through various combinations of Aux/IAA-ARF transcriptional regulatory elements [10].
The complex functions of auxins cannot be fully elucidated by TIR1/AFB-mediated signaling transduction alone. Certain Aux/IAA proteins that lack conserved Domain I or II are incapable of binding to TIR1/AFB proteins, indicating that their mechanisms of action diverge from the classical auxin signaling pathway mediated by TIR1/AFB proteins [27]. This includes the TMK1-IAA32/34 and MPK14-AtIAA33 signaling pathways in Arabidopsis, as well as the SOR1-OsIAA26 signaling pathway in rice [28,29,30]. Reports indicate that high concentrations of auxin can induce cleavage of the carboxy-terminal (C-) region of transmembrane kinase 1 (TMK1), thereby transmitting auxin signals to the nucleus and cytoplasm, which regulates downstream gene expression. Concurrently, the C-terminal region specifically recognizes and phosphorylates AtIAA32/34; the modified AtIAA32/34 inhibits transcriptional activity by binding to ARF, leading to the suppression of cell elongation in the inner cells of the cotyledon apex [29]. Additionally, high concentrations of auxin can promote the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 (MPK14). The activated MPK14 can bind and phosphorylate the AtIAA33 protein, stabilizing it. At the same time, AtIAA33 competes with AtIAA5 to bind the downstream inhibitor ARF10/16, resulting in the degradation of AtIAA5 protein through the TIR1/AFBs nuclear receptor signaling pathway [30]. An E3 ubiquitin ligase SOR1 (soil-surface rooting 1) was identified in the roots of the rice mutant mhz2, which interacts with the typical protein OsIAA9 and the atypical protein OsIAA26. At low levels of ethylene or auxin, OsIAA9 binds to SOR1, inhibiting its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity and preventing SOR1 from modifying and degrading OsIAA26 protein. Conversely, at higher levels, OsIAA9 is degraded via the canonical auxin signaling pathway, activating SOR1, which subsequently degrades OsIAA26 through ubiquitination, ultimately inhibiting rice root elongation [28]. These studies indicate that auxin exhibits non-canonical signal transduction mechanisms across multiple regulatory levels. However, regarding biological significance, atypical and typical signaling transduction pathways coordinate with one another to control the complex developmental processes of plants [31,32].

4. Research on the Function of Aux/IAA Genes in Arabidopsis

4.1. Regulation of Aux/IAA Genes on the Growth and Development of Arabidopsis

Currently, 29 members of the Aux/IAA gene family have been identified in Arabidopsis [27]. Most members of the Aux/IAA family are associated with root growth and development, as well as other important biological processes (Figure 3). For instance, the AXR5 gene in Arabidopsis encodes the AtIAA1 protein, and the axr5 mutant exhibits auxin resistance. In media containing excess auxin, this mutant inhibits lateral root growth [33]. The overexpression of AtIAA1 has been shown to suppress hypocotyl elongation, leaf expansion, and stem elongation in Arabidopsis. This suggests that AtIAA1 may play a crucial role in regulating cell elongation and cell division in the aerial parts of Arabidopsis, as well as in vascular development [34]. The gene encoding AtIAA3 has a gain-of-function mutant atiaa3/shy2, which affects root hair growth, lateral root formation, and gravitropism, indicating that SHY2/IAA3 regulates multiple auxin responses in roots [35]. AtIAA8 regulates lateral root formation by interacting with the TIR1 auxin receptor and ARF transcription factors in the nucleus [36]. AtIAA12 and AtIAA14 are key regulators of lateral root formation. The AtIAA14/SLR-AtARF7/19 auxin pattern hinders lateral root formation by partially and completely blocking pericycle cell division [37,38,39]. In divided pericycle cells, the BDL/IAA12–MP/ARF5-mediated auxin response ensures the formation of lateral roots regulated by downstream SOLITARY-ROOT (SLR)/IAA14 [40]. Similarly, AtIAA18-AtARF7/19 and AtIAA19-AtARF7 are also essential for regulating lateral root formation [41,42]. Rinaldi et al. found that the mutant atiaa16 exhibits an auxin-deficient phenotype, characterized by reduced main root elongation, shortened root hairs, and a decreased number of lateral roots in seedlings, indicating that AtIAA16 plays a unique role in auxin-regulated root development [43]. AtIAA27 and RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) represent an alternative pathway for transcriptional repression mediated by CLSY1 (CLASSY chromatin remodeling factor). This pathway plays a crucial role in regulating lateral root development, particularly when the canonical auxin pathway is disrupted [44]. The transcription of AtIAA28 is not induced by exogenous auxin, and the atiaa28 mutant exhibits severe defects in lateral root formation, characterized by impaired root hair number and reduced root branching patterns [45]. Additionally, AtIAA28 regulates the specification of lateral root primordia cells and the root branching pattern by modulating the expression of AtGATA23 [46]. In a study involving the Arabidopsis mutant axr2, it was found that the AtIAA7 (AXR2/auxin-resistant 2) gene can trigger photomorphogenic effects in plants and negatively regulate flowering time-related genes [47,48]. Furthermore, it has been observed that axr2-17/iaa7 mutants in Arabidopsis exhibit a lack of response to gravitropism in the stems, defects in hypocotyl gravitropism, and a reduction in hypocotyl length in the absence of light [49]. Rouse and Kubalová et al. [50,51] found that AtIAA17 is involved in several typical phenotypes controlled by auxin signaling, such as hypocotyl elongation, root gravitropism, and the formation of root hairs and adventitious roots. Moreover, AtIAA1, AtIAA3, AtIAA9, and AtIAA17 can be phosphorylated by PHYTOCHROME A (PhyA) in vitro, providing evidence for the involvement of auxin in phototransduction [52].
In addition to the typical Aux/IAA genes previously mentioned, plants overexpressing atypical Aux/IAA genes, such as AtIAA20, AtIAA30, and AtIAA31, exhibited abnormal gravitropic responses in their hypocotyls and roots, accompanied by significant inhibition of root growth. This observation indicates their involvement in the regulation of plant gravitropic responses, as well as in root growth and developmental processes [53]. Compared to wild-type (WT) plants, AtIAA20 and AtIAA30 plants displayed distinct phenotypes, including the formation of ectopic protoxylem cells in the root epidermis, vessel deformation, and the discontinuity or even loss of protoxylem [54].

4.2. The Impact of Aux/IAA Genes on Abiotic Stress in Arabidopsis

In the context of global warming, the increasing frequency of high-temperature droughts and severe soil salinization underscores the importance of plants’ ability to withstand non-biological stress. The Aux/IAA family plays a pivotal role in regulating plant defense responses through hormone signaling pathways [36,55]. Research has demonstrated that the CaNAC46 transcription factor in Arabidopsis enhances the expression of AtIAA4 in response to drought and salt stress [56]. Furthermore, transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing MeAnn2 under salt stress exhibits improved salt tolerance compared to WT plants. Notably, the expression level of the auxin signaling pathway-related gene AtIAA4 significantly increases, suggesting that MeAnn2 may enhance the salt tolerance of Arabidopsis by modulating the auxin signaling pathway response mediated by AtIAA4 [57]. Under drought and high-salt conditions, AtCPR5-AtIAA12/19 jointly regulate auxin signaling transduction and inhibit lateral root development [58]. In drought conditions, AtIAA5, AtIAA6, and AtIAA19 are directly regulated by DREB2A and DREB2B, which maintain the levels of aliphatic glucosinolates (GLS) to enhance drought tolerance. The absence of AtIAA5/6/19 results in a decrease in GLS levels, consequently reducing the plant’s drought tolerance [59]. Other studies have found that under high chromium (Cr) levels, AtIAA14/SLR1 (SOLITARY-ROOT) inhibits the growth of both main and lateral roots while promoting adventitious root growth [60] (Figure 4).

5. Research on the Functions of Aux/IAA Genes in Rice

5.1. Regulation of Aux/IAA Genes in Rice Growth and Development

Aux/IAA genes play a crucial role in regulating plant development, with 31 identified members in rice [61]. These genes are involved in various growth and developmental processes, including lateral root development, tiller angle formation, and grain development (Figure 5). For instance, OsIAA1 is induced by auxin and is essential for photomorphogenesis and coleoptile elongation in rice [62]. It also negatively influences plant height and leaf angle through auxin and brassinosteroid (BR) hormone signaling [63]. OsIAA3 positively regulates grain size in rice (Oryza sativa) by promoting cell expansion and proliferation of the spikelet hull [64]. Additionally, OsIAA3, OsIAA17, and Gnp4 interact to regulate the activity of the OsARF25 transcription factor (TF), thereby affecting grain length and leaf angle [65,66]. Qiao et al. [67] found that OsARF6 interacts with the auxin signaling negative regulators OsIAA8/20, altering the content and distribution of auxin in rice glume cells, which in turn regulates grain length and weight by affecting the size of glume cells. A recent report shows that overexpression of OsIAA4 in rice leads to reduced sensitivity to exogenous auxin, stunted plant growth, increased tillering angle, and weakened gravitropism compared to WT plants [68]. The overexpression of OsIAA6 enhances drought tolerance; however, the loss-of-function mutant of OsIAA6 exhibits more tiller growth than the WT [69]. Conversely, the overexpression of OsIAA10 increases the number of tillers [70]. Hu et al. [71] found that OsIAA7, OsIAA11, and OsIAA30 regulate the gravitropism and tillering angle of rice stems by either inhibiting or releasing OsARF5. Additionally, the degradation of OsIAA11 is crucial for initiating lateral root formation, as it also regulates lateral root primordia, callus initiation, and the uptake of manganese (Mn) and cadmium (Cd) [72,73,74,75,76]. Chen et al. [77] discovered that transgenic plants overexpressing OsIAA12 or deficient in OsARF17 exhibit a larger leaf angle. OsIAA9, a classical Aux/IAA protein, when expressed as a WT in Arabidopsis, influences lateral root formation and root gravitropism [78]. Yuka et al. found that the gain-of-function mutant Osiaa13 displays a phenotype characterized by reduced lateral roots and defective root gravitropism, demonstrating the involvement of OsIAA13 in auxin signaling and the regulation of genes involved in lateral root primordia in rice [79]. The OsIAA23 gene plays a crucial role in maintaining the post-embryonic development stage of the quiescent center (QC) in semi-dominant mutants by mediating the auxin signaling pathway and is also involved in the development of lateral and adventitious roots [80]. Plants overexpressing OsIAA31 genes exhibit shorter leaves, reduced adventitious roots, and insensitivity to auxin and gravitropism stimuli, indicating its involvement in the growth and development of leaves and adventitious roots [81].

5.2. The Impact of Aux/IAA Genes on Abiotic Stress in Rice

Rice mitigates or resists abiotic stresses such as drought, salt, and low temperature through Aux/IAA regulation (Figure 6). Under high-salt conditions, OsIAA9 and OsIAA20 are significantly upregulated, while OsIAA10 and OsIAA25 are significantly downregulated in response to drought conditions [82]. Furthermore, the abscisic acid (ABA) response gene OsRab21 is downregulated in OsIAA20 RNAi and upregulated in OsIAA20 overexpression lines, indicating that OsIAA20 plays a crucial role in plant responses to drought and salt stress through the ABA pathway transduction mechanism [83]. Jung et al. [69] showed that OsIAA6 is highly induced by drought stress, and the drought resistance of OsIAA6 overexpression lines is significantly enhanced, suggesting that OsIAA6 is involved in the drought stress response. Additionally, transgenic rice overexpressing OsIAA18 exhibits higher chlorophyll content and greater sensitivity to ABA under drought and salt stress compared to WT plants, indicating that OsIAA18 plays a positive role in drought and salt tolerance by regulating stress-induced ABA signaling [84] (Figure 6).

6. Research on the Functions of Aux/IAA Genes in Maize

6.1. Regulation of Aux/IAA Genes in Maize Growth and Development

To date, 40 Aux/IAA genes have been identified in maize, designated as ZmIAA1-ZmIAA40 [85]. Von Behrens et al. [86] identified RUM1 (ROOTLESS WITH UNDETECTABLE MERISTEM 1) in maize, which encodes the Aux/IAA10 protein. This protein plays a crucial role in regulating the formation of lateral roots through a signaling pathway mediated by the maize proteins ZmARF25 and ZmARF34. Furthermore, the analysis of RUM1 highlighted its crucial role in the specific regulation of auxin signaling components and vascular development [87]. Galli et al. [88] reported two genes, BIF1 (BARREN INFLORESCENCE1) and BIF4 (BARREN INFLORESCENCE4), encoding ZmIAA27 and ZmIAA20 involved in the auxin signaling pathway, that regulate maize organ development by mediating auxin transport. Additionally, ZmIAA5 regulates the growth and development of maize roots by interacting with ZmARF5 under the specific binding of ZmTCP15/16/17 [89]. A recent study found that ZmEREB167 directly targets OPAQUE2, ZmNRT1.1, ZmIAA12, ZmIAA19, and ZmbZIP20, inhibiting their expression. It acts as a negative regulator in maize endosperm development and affects starch accumulation and grain size, indicating that ZmIAA12 and ZmIAA19 are involved in maize endosperm development [90]. ZmIAA29 interacts with ZmARF transcription factors to regulate maize flowering time by affecting plant signal transduction and the key genes related to maize flowering [91]. In addition, ZmCLA4 can directly bind to the promoter regions of auxin-related genes ZmARF22 and ZmIAA26, thereby regulating the leaf angle of maize [92] (Figure 7).

6.2. The Impact of Aux/IAA Genes on Abiotic Stress in Maize

Yan et al. [93] demonstrated that under high-salt conditions, the overexpression of ZmbHLH32 enhances salt tolerance in maize, while the knockout mutant of ZmbHLH32 exhibits a reduced capacity for salt tolerance. Experimental results indicate that ZmbHLH32 can directly bind to the promoter region of ZmIAA9 to activate its expression. Furthermore, ZmARF1 interacts with ZmIAA9 and suppresses the expression levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS)-scavenging genes. These findings suggest that the regulatory pathway mediated by the ZmbHLH32-ZmIAA9-ZmARF1 module plays a crucial role in influencing salt tolerance in maize [93]. Zhang et al. [94] found that under drought stress, ZmCCT interacts with ZmFra a1, ZmWIPF2, and ZmIAA8 to regulate the expression of auxin-responsive genes, thereby regulating maize drought tolerance. This indicates that ZmIAA8 is involved in the regulation of maize drought tolerance. Through mutant analysis, ZmIAA2, ZmIAA10, and ZmIAA21 were shown to mitigate aluminum stress and play a critical role in root elongation and lateral root primordium formation [95,96] (Figure 8).

7. Research Progress on the Aux/IAA Family in Other Plants

A total of 34 Aux/IAA genes were identified in wheat, of which 30 exhibit duplications in the A, B, or D subgenomes, resulting in a total of 84 Aux/IAA sequences [13]. In wheat roots, the expression of TaSHY2 and TaIAA7 is downregulated by drought stress and upregulated by cytokinin treatment, thereby inhibiting root growth [97]. Research has demonstrated that mutations in TaIAA21 significantly enhance grain length, width, and weight. Conversely, mutations in TaARF25, which interacts with TaIAA21, result in a reduction in grain size and weight. Experimental evidence indicates that TaARF25 promotes the transcription of ERFs (ethylene response factors); however, mutations in TtERF3 lead to decreased grain size and weight. These findings suggest that TaIAA21 functions as a negative regulator of grain size and weight through the ARF25-ERFs module [98]. Zhao et al. [99] found that TaHST1L mediates the auxin signaling pathway by interacting with TaIAA17, playing a pivotal role in regulating endogenous auxin levels and thus affecting wheat tillering patterns. Su et al. [100] discovered that TaIAA15-1A positively regulates plant drought tolerance by activating the ABA signaling pathway. Zeng et al. [101] found that the TaIAA19 gene may influence wheat gravitropism by regulating the expression of ARF and PIN genes.
In tomato, there are 36 Aux/IAA genes, designated as SlIAA1–SlIAA36 [102]. For instance, SlIAA9 interacts with SlARF6A, SlARF8A, SlARF8B, and SlARF24, thereby elucidating the molecular mechanism by which SlIAA9 regulates leaf development [103]. Additionally, researchers have found that the SlDELLA and SlARF7/SlIAA9 complexes regulate the interaction between gibberellin (GA) and auxin, thus modulating fruit formation [104]. Deng et al. [105] demonstrated that the downregulation of SlIAA15 diminishes apical dominance in tomatoes, affects axillary bud development, promotes lateral root formation, and increases leaf thickness, indicating that SlIAA15 plays a significant role in leaf and lateral root development. Through RNA interference (RNAi) silencing of SlIAA17, Su et al. [106] discovered that SlIAA17 RNAi fruits were larger than wild-type fruits, suggesting that SlIAA17 is involved in regulating fruit size. Bassa et al. [107] reported that SlIAA27 knockout plants exhibited increased auxin sensitivity, altered root development, and reduced chlorophyll content in leaves. The fertility of ovules and pollen significantly decreased following SlIAA27 knockdown, indicating that SlIAA27 is involved in both vegetative and reproductive growth in tomatoes. The latest study revealed that SlKD1 interacts with SlGATA6 through its KNOX2 domain, thereby inhibiting the transcriptional activation ability of SlGATA6 on the downstream target genes SlLAX2 and SlIAA3. This interaction ultimately disrupts auxin gradients and organ abscission through the SlKD1-SlGATA6-SlLAX2/SlIAA3-SlARF2a molecular module [108].
In potato, StIAA9 is highly expressed during tuber initiation and is involved in the formation and development of potato tubers [109]. Furthermore, the inhibition of StIAA2 results in alterations in aboveground morphology and an increase in plant height [110] (Table 1).

8. Conclusions and Perspectives

Among the three major gene families involved in early auxin response, the Aux/IAA family was investigated in this study, and their biological functions, phylogenetics, protein structures, expression patterns, and physiological roles in various processes such as plant growth and development were elucidated. Aux/IAA proteins not only participate in the auxin signaling pathway but are also crucial for regulating plant growth and development, as well as responses to abiotic stress, through interactions between auxins and other plant hormones.
The current research primarily focuses on the role of Aux/IAA in various aspects of plant growth and development via the auxin signaling pathway, while there is less attention paid to Aux/IAA’s role in regulating plant stress resistance through interactions with other plant hormones. Previous studies have revealed that interaction modules between ARF-Aux/IAA and other proteins are widespread, yet the mechanisms underlying these regulatory modules remain largely unknown. Furthermore, functional studies on the Aux/IAA family in crops such as wheat, maize, and potato are relatively scarce. Elucidating the biological functions of Aux/IAA in these crops could provide valuable genetic resources for improving crop quality and yield. For instance, genes such as OsIAA3, OsIAA8, ZmIAA12, ZmIAA19, and TaIAA21 serve as regulators of grain size and weight, presenting opportunities for enhancing crop productivity. Therefore, research targeting crop stress tolerance, yield improvement, and the interaction modules of ARF-Aux/IAA is essential.
Studies have demonstrated that Aux/IAA genes originated prior to the divergence of monocots and dicots. However, these proteins were either lost or evolved subsequently, playing a significant role in the development of either group. Furthermore, some non-homologous Aux/IAA proteins in monocots may be crucial in determining species-specific traits and functions, suggesting that monocot Aux/IAA proteins possess unique functions and regulatory mechanisms. Interestingly, even proteins with close homology may exhibit opposite regulatory effects in different plant species. Notably, no sister pairs were identified between dicots and monocots, whereas sister pairs were present within the same species type, exemplified by OsIAAs and ZmIAAs, as well as SlIAAs and AtIAAs [111]. Consequently, the roles of Aux/IAA genes in monocots and dicots warrant further investigation.
In recent years, the application of CRISPR/Cas9 targeted gene knockout technology and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has significantly increased in plant research, providing new insights into the study of Aux/IAA. Jiang et al. utilized CRISPR/Cas9 to knock out the OsIAA23 gene in rice, generating several Osiaa23 mutants with distinct knockout genotypes, which resulted in varied phenotypes [112]. Jia et al. generated the osiaa19 mutant using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. Their findings indicate that the OsIAA19 mutation significantly increased both grain length and weight in rice while showing no significant effects on plant height, tiller number, or flag leaf dimensions (length and width) [113]. By employing targeted knockouts, researchers can address functional redundancy within the Aux/IAA gene family, identify key regulatory elements or signaling components associated with Aux/IAA, and utilize efficient gene editing techniques to accurately target and design these elements. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is used to identify transcriptional regulation at the single-cell level, providing a reference gene expression profile for specific cell types or conditions to facilitate the identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). When combined with spatial transcriptomics (STs), scRNA-seq enhances our understanding of cellular gene expression within tissues, intercellular interactions, and the visualization of complex cellular relationships. Raquel et al. [114] employed scRNA-seq with auxin-induced synthetic promoters to elucidate the complexity of ARF-regulated transcription. Their findings demonstrated that the transcriptional properties of ARFs are not solely intrinsic; they also depend on the configuration of the cis-elements to which they bind, thereby revealing a dual-layer ARF/cis-element transcriptional code [114]. The application of these innovative technologies offers new insights into the intricate genetic and molecular mechanisms within cells and the interactions between plants and their environment, thereby laying the groundwork for accelerating the analysis of Aux/IAA functions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Z. and Y.P.; methodology, Z.Z.; investigation, J.B., Z.R. and W.T.; formal analysis, Z.Z., J.B., Z.R. and W.T.; data curation, J.B., Z.R. and W.T.; resources, Y.P.; visualization, Z.Z. and J.B.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.P. and Z.R.; supervision, Y.P.; project administration, Y.P.; funding acquisition, Y.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Technology Program of Gansu Province (22JR5RA848); Gansu Province Science and Technology Plan—Major Project (22ZD6NA009); Innovation Star Project for Excellent Postgraduates of Gansu Province, China (2023CXZX-646); National Key Research and Development Project (2022YFD1201804); Gansu Province Higher Education Industry Support Plan (2022CYZC-46); Local Science and Technology Development Fund Project (23ZYQA0322); Central Government Guiding Local Science and Technology Development Fund Project (25ZYJA002); and Tibet Autonomous Region Science and Technology Plan Project (XZ202501ZY0086).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Leyser, O. The Power of Auxin in Plants. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154, 501–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Larsson, E.; Vivian-Smith, A.; Offringa, R.; Sundberg, E. Auxin Homeostasis in Arabidopsis Ovules Is Anther-Dependent at Maturation and Changes Dynamically upon Fertilization. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, Z.-X.; Zhang, L.-F.; Li, W.-F.; Qi, L.-W.; Han, S.-Y. MIR166a Affects the Germination of Somatic Embryos in Larixleptolepis by Modulating IAA Biosynthesis and Signaling Genes. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2017, 36, 889–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Park, S.-H.; Elhiti, M.; Wang, H.; Xu, A.; Brown, D.; Wang, A. Adventitious root formation of in vitro peach shoots is regulated by auxin and ethylene. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 226, 250–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hagen, G.; Guilfoyle, T. Auxin-responsive gene expression: Genes, promoters and regulatory factors. Plant Mol. Biol. 2002, 49, 373–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Schuller, A.; Kehr, J.; Ludwig-Müller, J. Laser Microdissection Coupled to Transcriptional Profiling of Arabidopsis Roots Inoculated by Plasmodiophora brassicae Indicates a Role for Brassinosteroids in Clubroot Formation. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013, 55, 392–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Devos, S.; Laukens, K.; Deckers, P.; Van Der Straeten, D.; Beeckman, T.; Inzé, D.; Van Onckelen, H.; Witters, E.; Prinsen, E. A Hormone and Proteome Approach to Picturing the Initial Metabolic Events During Plasmodiophora brassicae Infection on Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.® 2006, 19, 1431–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Weijers, D.; Wagner, D. Transcriptional Responses to the Auxin Hormone. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2016, 67, 539–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Guilfoyle, T.J. The PB1 Domain in Auxin Response Factor and Aux/IAA Proteins: A Versatile Protein Interaction Module in the Auxin Response. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bao, D.; Chang, S.; Li, X.; Qi, Y. Advances in the study of auxin early response genes: Aux/IAA, GH3, and SAUR. Crop J. 2024, 12, 964–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Reed, J.W. Roles and activities of Aux/IAA proteins in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 2001, 6, 420–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Luo, J.; Zhou, J.-J.; Zhang, J.-Z. Aux/IAA Gene Family in Plants: Molecular Structure, Regulation, and Function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Qiao, L.; Zhang, X.; Han, X.; Zhang, L.; Li, X.; Zhan, H.; Ma, J.; Luo, P.; Zhang, W.; Cui, L.; et al. A genome-wide analysis of the auxin/indole-3-acetic acid gene family in hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Long, J.A.; Ohno, C.; Smith, Z.R.; Meyerowitz, E.M. TOPLESS Regulates Apical Embryonic Fate in Arabidopsis. Science 2006, 312, 1520–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yu, Z.; Zhang, F.; Friml, J.; Ding, Z. Auxin signaling: Research advances over the past 30 years. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2022, 64, 371–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chapman, E.J.; Estelle, M. Mechanism of Auxin-Regulated Gene Expression in Plants. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2009, 43, 265–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guilfoyle, T.J.; Hagen, G. Getting a grasp on domain III/IV responsible for Auxin Response Factor–IAA protein interactions. Plant Sci. 2012, 190, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cui, X.; Wang, J.; Li, K.; Lv, B.; Hou, B.; Ding, Z. Protein post-translational modifications in auxin signaling. J. Genet. Genom. 2024, 51, 279–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tang, W.; Yu, Y.; Xu, T. The interplay between extracellular and intracellular auxin signaling in plants. J. Genet. Genom. 2025, 52, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, L.; Yahaya, B.S.; Li, J.; Wu, F. Enigmatic role of auxin response factors in plant growth and stress tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1398818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, R.; Estelle, M. Diversity and specificity: Auxin perception and signaling through the TIR1/AFB pathway. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 21, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lee, D.J.; Park, J.W.; Lee, H.W.; Kim, J. Genome-wide analysis of the auxin-responsive transcriptome downstream of iaa1 and its expression analysis reveal the diversity and complexity of auxin-regulated gene expression. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 3935–3957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tiwari, S.B.; Hagen, G.; Guilfoyle, T. The Roles of Auxin Response Factor Domains in Auxin-Responsive Transcription. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 533–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, S.-B.; Xie, Z.-Z.; Hu, C.-G.; Zhang, J.-Z. A Review of Auxin Response Factors (ARFs) in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Leyser, O. Auxin Signaling. Plant Physiol. 2017, 176, 465–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cho, M.; Cho, H. The function of ABCB transporters in auxin transport. Plant Signal. Behav. 2013, 8, e22990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dreher, K.A.; Brown, J.; Saw, R.E.; Callis, J. The Arabidopsis Aux/IAA Protein Family Has Diversified in Degradation and Auxin Responsiveness. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 699–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, H.; Ma, B.; Zhou, Y.; He, S.-J.; Tang, S.-Y.; Lu, X.; Xie, Q.; Chen, S.-Y.; Zhang, J.-S. E3 ubiquitin ligase SOR1 regulates ethylene response in rice root by modulating stability of Aux/IAA protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 4513–4518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cao, M.; Chen, R.; Li, P.; Yu, Y.; Zheng, R.; Ge, D.; Zheng, W.; Wang, X.; Gu, Y.; Gelová, Z.; et al. TMK1-mediated auxin signalling regulates differential growth of the apical hook. Nature 2019, 568, 240–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lv, B.; Yu, Q.; Liu, J.; Wen, X.; Yan, Z.; Hu, K.; Li, H.; Kong, X.; Li, C.; Tian, H.; et al. Non-canonical AUX/IAA protein IAA33 competes with canonical AUX/IAA repressor IAA5 to negatively regulate auxin signaling. EMBO J. 2020, 39, e101515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yu, Y.; Tang, W.; Lin, W.; Li, W.; Zhou, X.; Li, Y.; Chen, R.; Zheng, R.; Qin, G.; Cao, W.; et al. ABLs and TMKs are co-receptors for extracellular auxin. Cell 2023, 186, 5457–5471.e5417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chandler, J.W. Auxin response factors. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 39, 1014–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yang, X.; Lee, S.; So, J.-h.; Dharmasiri, S.; Dharmasiri, N.; Ge, L.; Jensen, C.; Hangarter, R.; Hobbie, L.; Estelle, M. The IAA1 protein is encoded by AXR5 and is a substrate of SCFTIR1. Plant J. 2004, 40, 772–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ku, S.-J.; Park, J.-Y.; Ha, S.-B.; Kim, J. Overexpression of IAA1 with domain II mutation impairs cell elongation and cell division in inflorescences and leaves of Arabidopsis. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166, 548–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tian, Q.; Reed, J.W. Control of auxin-regulated root development by the Arabidopsis thaliana SHY2/IAA3 gene. Development 1999, 126, 711–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Arase, F.; Nishitani, H.; Egusa, M.; Nishimoto, N.; Sakurai, S.; Sakamoto, N.; Kaminaka, H. IAA8 Involved in Lateral Root Formation Interacts with the TIR1 Auxin Receptor and ARF Transcription Factors in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e43414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fukaki, H.; Nakao, Y.; Okushima, Y.; Theologis, A.; Tasaka, M. Tissue-specific expression of stabilized SOLITARY-ROOT/IAA14 alters lateral root development in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2005, 44, 382–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fukaki, H.; Tameda, S.; Masuda, H.; Tasaka, M. Lateral root formation is blocked by a gain-of-function mutation in the SOLITARY-ROOT/IAA14 gene of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2002, 29, 153–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vanneste, S.; De Rybel, B.; Beemster, G.T.S.; Ljung, K.; De Smet, I.; Van Isterdael, G.; Naudts, M.; Iida, R.; Gruissem, W.; Tasaka, M.; et al. Cell Cycle Progression in the Pericycle Is Not Sufficient for SOLITARY ROOT/IAA14-Mediated Lateral Root Initiation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 3035–3050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wójcikowska, B.; Belaidi, S.; Robert, H.S. Game of thrones among AUXIN RESPONSE FACTORs—Over 30 years of MONOPTEROS research. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 6904–6921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Uehara, T.; Okushima, Y.; Mimura, T.; Tasaka, M.; Fukaki, H. Domain II Mutations in CRANE/IAA18 Suppress Lateral Root Formation and Affect Shoot Development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49, 1025–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hamann, T.; Benkova, E.; Bäurle, I.; Kientz, M.; Jürgens, G. The Arabidopsis BODENLOS gene encodes an auxin response protein inhibiting MONOPTEROS-mediated embryo patterning. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 1610–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rinaldi, M.A.; Liu, J.; Enders, T.A.; Bartel, B.; Strader, L.C. A gain-of-function mutation in IAA16 confers reduced responses to auxin and abscisic acid and impedes plant growth and fertility. Plant Mol. Biol. 2012, 79, 359–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shahzad, Z.; Eaglesfield, R.; Carr, C.; Amtmann, A. Cryptic variation in RNA-directed DNA-methylation controls lateral root development when auxin signalling is perturbed. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rogg, L.E.; Lasswell, J.; Bartel, B. A Gain-of-Function Mutation in IAA28 Suppresses Lateral Root Development. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 465–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. De Rybel, B.; Vassileva, V.; Parizot, B.; Demeulenaere, M.; Grunewald, W.; Audenaert, D.; Van Campenhout, J.; Overvoorde, P.; Jansen, L.; Vanneste, S.; et al. A Novel Aux/IAA28 Signaling Cascade Activates GATA23-Dependent Specification of Lateral Root Founder Cell Identity. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, 1697–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Timpte, C.; Wilson, A.K.; Estelle, M. The axr2-1 mutation of Arabidopsis thaliana is a gain-of-function mutation that disrupts an early step in auxin response. Genetics 1994, 138, 1239–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sato, A.; Sasaki, S.; Matsuzaki, J.; Yamamoto, K.T. Light-dependent gravitropism and negative phototropism of inflorescence stems in a dominant Aux/IAA mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana, axr2. J. Plant Res. 2014, 127, 627–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Belin, C.; Megies, C.; Hauserová, E.; Lopez-Molina, L. Abscisic Acid Represses Growth of the Arabidopsis Embryonic Axis after Germination by Enhancing Auxin Signaling. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 2253–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rouse, D.; Mackay, P.; Stirnberg, P.; Estelle, M.; Leyser, O. Changes in Auxin Response from Mutations in an AUX/IAA Gene. Science 1998, 279, 1371–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kubalová, M.; Müller, K.; Dobrev, P.I.; Rizza, A.; Jones, A.M.; Fendrych, M. Auxin co-receptor IAA17/AXR3 controls cell elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana root solely by modulation of nuclear auxin pathway. New Phytol. 2024, 241, 2448–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Colón-Carmona, A.n.; Chen, D.L.; Yeh, K.-C.; Abel, S. Aux/IAA Proteins Are Phosphorylated by Phytochrome in Vitro1. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 1728–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Sato, A.; Yamamoto, K.T. Overexpression of the non-canonical Aux/IAA genes causes auxin-related aberrant phenotypes in Arabidopsis. Physiol. Plant. 2008, 133, 397–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Müller, C.J.; Valdés, A.E.; Wang, G.; Ramachandran, P.; Beste, L.; Uddenberg, D.; Carlsbecker, A. PHABULOSA Mediates an Auxin Signaling Loop to Regulate Vascular Patterning in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2016, 170, 956–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kirungu, J.N.; Magwanga, R.O.; Lu, P.; Cai, X.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, X.; Peng, R.; Wang, K.; Liu, F. Functional characterization of Gh_A08G1120 (GH3.5) gene reveal their significant role in enhancing drought and salt stress tolerance in cotton. BMC Genet. 2019, 20, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ma, J.; Wang, L.-y.; Dai, J.-x.; Wang, Y.; Lin, D. The NAC-type transcription factor CaNAC46 regulates the salt and drought tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lin, X.; Li, R.; Zhou, Y.; Tang, F.; Wang, Y.; Lu, X.; Wang, S.; Yao, Y.; Liu, J.; Hu, X.; et al. Overexpression of Cassava MeAnn2 Enhances the Salt and IAA Tolerance of Transgenic Arabidopsis. Plants 2021, 10, 941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nam, H.; Han, S.; Lee, S.; Nam, H.; Lim, H.; Lee, G.; Cho, H.S.; Dang, T.V.T.; Choi, S.; Lee, M.M.; et al. CPR5-mediated nucleo-cytoplasmic localization of IAA12 and IAA19 controls lateral root development during abiotic stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2209781120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Salehin, M.; Li, B.; Tang, M.; Katz, E.; Song, L.; Ecker, J.R.; Kliebenstein, D.J.; Estelle, M. Auxin-sensitive Aux/IAA proteins mediate drought tolerance in Arabidopsis by regulating glucosinolate levels. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. López-Bucio, J.; Ortiz-Castro, R.; Ruíz-Herrera, L.F.; Juárez, C.V.; Hernández-Madrigal, F.; Carreón-Abud, Y.; Martínez-Trujillo, M. Chromate induces adventitious root formation via auxin signalling and SOLITARY-ROOT/IAA14 gene function in Arabidopsis thaliana. BioMetals 2015, 28, 353–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jain, M.; Kaur, N.; Garg, R.; Thakur, J.K.; Tyagi, A.K.; Khurana, J.P. Structure and expression analysis of early auxin-responsive Aux/IAA gene family in rice (Oryza sativa). Funct. Integr. Genom. 2006, 6, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Thakur, J.K.; Tyagi, A.K.; Khurana, J.P. OsIAA1, an Aux/IAA cDNA from Rice, and Changes in Its Expression as Influenced by Auxin and Light. DNA Res. 2001, 8, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Song, Y.; You, J.; Xiong, L. Characterization of OsIAA1 gene, a member of rice Aux/IAA family involved in auxin and brassinosteroid hormone responses and plant morphogenesis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2009, 70, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Xian, F.; Liu, S.; Huang, J.; Xie, B.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, Q.; Lv, C.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Hu, J. The OsIAA3-OsARF16-OsBUL1 auxin signaling module regulates grain size in rice. Plant Physiol. 2025, 197, kiaf122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, Z. Cloning and Molecular Mechanism Analysis of Yield Related Gene Gnp4 in Rice. Ph.D. Thesis, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  66. Zhang, Z.; Li, J.; Tang, Z.; Sun, X.; Zhang, H.; Yu, J.; Yao, G.; Li, G.; Guo, H.; Li, J.; et al. Gnp4/LAX2, a RAWUL protein, interferes with the OsIAA3–OsARF25 interaction to regulate grain length via the auxin signaling pathway in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 4723–4737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Qiao, J.; Jiang, H.; Lin, Y.; Shang, L.; Wang, M.; Li, D.; Fu, X.; Geisler, M.; Qi, Y.; Gao, Z.; et al. A novel miR167a-OsARF6-OsAUX3 module regulates grain length and weight in rice. Mol. Plant 2021, 14, 1683–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Song, Y.; Xu, Z.-F. Ectopic Overexpression of an AUXIN/INDOLE-3-ACETIC ACID (Aux/IAA) Gene OsIAA4 in Rice Induces Morphological Changes and Reduces Responsiveness to Auxin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 13645–13656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jung, H.; Lee, D.-K.; Choi, Y.D.; Kim, J.-K. OsIAA6, a member of the rice Aux/IAA gene family, is involved in drought tolerance and tiller outgrowth. Plant Sci. 2015, 236, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Han, S.; Hwang, I. Integration of multiple signaling pathways shapes the auxin response. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 69, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hu, Y.; Xue, D.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Yang, J.; Lv, Y.; Yan, B.; Yin, Y.; Cui, Z.; et al. An auxin response factor regulates tiller angle and shoot gravitropism by directly activating related gene expression in rice. J. Adv. Res. 2025; online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhu, Z.-X.; Liu, Y.; Liu, S.-J.; Mao, C.-Z.; Wu, Y.-R.; Wu, P. A Gain-of-Function Mutation in OsIAA11 Affects Lateral Root Development in Rice. Mol. Plant 2012, 5, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kang, B.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, L.; Zheng, L.; Mao, W.; Li, M.; Wu, Y.; Wu, P.; Mo, X. OsCYP2, a chaperone involved in degradation of auxin-responsive proteins, plays crucial roles in rice lateral root initiation. Plant J. 2013, 74, 86–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Chen, Y.; Yang, Q.; Sang, S.; Wei, Z.; Wang, P. Rice Inositol Polyphosphate Kinase (OsIPK2) Directly Interacts with OsIAA11 to Regulate Lateral Root Formation. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58, 1891–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Guo, F.; Zhang, H.; Liu, W.; Hu, X.; Han, N.; Qian, Q.; Xu, L.; Bian, H. Callus Initiation from Root Explants Employs Different Strategies in Rice and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018, 59, 1782–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yu, E.; Yamaji, N.; Mao, C.; Wang, H.; Ma, J.F. Lateral roots but not root hairs contribute to high uptake of manganese and cadmium in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 7219–7228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chen, S.-H.; Zhou, L.-J.; Xu, P.; Xue, H.-W. SPOC domain-containing protein Leaf inclination3 interacts with LIP1 to regulate rice leaf inclination through auxin signaling. PLoS Genet. 2018, 14, e1007829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Luo, S.; Li, Q.; Liu, S.; Pinas, N.M.; Tian, H.; Wang, S. Constitutive Expression of OsIAA9 Affects Starch Granules Accumulation and Root Gravitropic Response in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kitomi, Y.; Inahashi, H.; Takehisa, H.; Sato, Y.; Inukai, Y. OsIAA13-mediated auxin signaling is involved in lateral root initiation in rice. Plant Sci. 2012, 190, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jun, N.; Gaohang, W.; Zhenxing, Z.; Huanhuan, Z.; Yunrong, W.; Ping, W. OsIAA23-mediated auxin signaling defines postembryonic maintenance of QC in rice. Plant J. 2011, 68, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Nakamura, A.; Umemura, I.; Gomi, K.; Hasegawa, Y.; Kitano, H.; Sazuka, T.; Matsuoka, M. Production and characterization of auxin-insensitive rice by overexpression of a mutagenized rice IAA protein. Plant J. 2006, 46, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Jain, M.; Khurana, J.P. Transcript profiling reveals diverse roles of auxin-responsive genes during reproductive development and abiotic stress in rice. FEBS J. 2009, 276, 3148–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhang, A.; Yang, X.; Lu, J.; Song, F.; Sun, J.; Wang, C.; Lian, J.; Zhao, L.; Zhao, B. OsIAA20, an Aux/IAA protein, mediates abiotic stress tolerance in rice through an ABA pathway. Plant Sci. 2021, 308, 110903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Wang, F.; Niu, H.; Xin, D.; Long, Y.; Wang, G.; Liu, Z.; Li, G.; Zhang, F.; Qi, M.; Ye, Y.; et al. OsIAA18, an Aux/IAA Transcription Factor Gene, Is Involved in Salt and Drought Tolerance in Rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 738660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Jiang, L.; Li, Z.; Yu, X.; Liu, C. Bioinformatics analysis of Aux/IAA gene family in maize. Agron. J. 2021, 113, 932–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. von Behrens, I.; Komatsu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Berendzen, K.W.; Niu, X.; Sakai, H.; Taramino, G.; Hochholdinger, F. Rootless with undetectable meristem 1 encodes a monocot-specific AUX/IAA protein that controls embryonic seminal and post-embryonic lateral root initiation in maize. Plant J. 2011, 66, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhang, Y.; Paschold, A.; Marcon, C.; Liu, S.; Tai, H.; Nestler, J.; Yeh, C.-T.; Opitz, N.; Lanz, C.; Schnable, P.S.; et al. The Aux/IAA gene rum1 involved in seminal and lateral root formation controls vascular patterning in maize (Zea mays L.) primary roots. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 4919–4930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Galli, M.; Liu, Q.; Moss, B.L.; Malcomber, S.; Li, W.; Gaines, C.; Federici, S.; Roshkovan, J.; Meeley, R.; Nemhauser, J.L.; et al. Auxin signaling modules regulate maize inflorescence architecture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 13372–13377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yang, F.; Shi, Y.; Zhao, M.; Cheng, B.; Li, X. ZmIAA5 regulates maize root growth and development by interacting with ZmARF5 under the specific binding of ZmTCP15/16/17. PeerJ 2022, 10, e13710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Qing, X.; Li, J.; Lin, Z.; Wang, W.; Yi, F.; Chen, J.; Liu, Q.; Song, W.; Lai, J.; Chen, B.; et al. Maize transcription factor ZmEREB167 negatively regulates starch accumulation and kernel size. J. Genet. Genom. 2025, 52, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ma, C.; Dang, K.; Xie, Q.; Sahito, J.H.; Yuan, B.; Wan, J.; Qiu, X.; Zhao, J.; Lin, Y.; Meng, S.; et al. Over-Expression of ZmIAA29, an AUX/IAA Transcription Factor, Improved Maize Flowering Time. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Dou, D.; Han, S.; Cao, L.; Ku, L.; Liu, H.; Su, H.; Ren, Z.; Zhang, D.; Zeng, H.; Dong, Y.; et al. CLA4 regulates leaf angle through multiple hormone signaling pathways in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 72, 1782–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Yan, Z.; Li, K.; Li, Y.; Wang, W.; Leng, B.; Yao, G.; Zhang, F.; Mu, C.; Liu, X. The ZmbHLH32-ZmIAA9-ZmARF1 module regulates salt tolerance in maize. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 253, 126978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Zhang, Z.; Qu, J.; Lu, M.; Zhao, X.; Xu, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, Z.; Shi, Y.; Liu, C.; Li, Y.; et al. The maize transcription factor CCT regulates drought tolerance by interacting with Fra a 1, E3 ligase WIPF2, and auxin response factor Aux/IAA8. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 75, 103–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhang, M.; Lu, X.; Li, C.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, X.-s.; Ding, Z. Auxin Efflux Carrier ZmPGP1 Mediates Root Growth Inhibition under Aluminum Stress. Plant Physiol. 2018, 177, 819–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wang, Y.; Xing, J.; Wan, J.; Yao, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Mi, G.; Chen, L.; Li, Z.; Zhang, M. Auxin efflux carrier ZmPIN1a modulates auxin reallocation involved in nitrate-mediated root formation. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Chen, D.; Richardson, T.; Chai, S.; Lynne McIntyre, C.; Rae, A.L.; Xue, G.-P. Drought-Up-Regulated TaNAC69-1 is a Transcriptional Repressor of TaSHY2 and TaIAA7, and Enhances Root Length and Biomass in Wheat. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 2076–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Jia, M.; Li, Y.; Wang, Z.; Tao, S.; Sun, G.; Kong, X.; Wang, K.; Ye, X.; Liu, S.; Geng, S.; et al. TaIAA21 represses TaARF25-mediated expression of TaERFs required for grain size and weight development in wheat. Plant J. 2021, 108, 1754–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhao, L.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, T.; Wang, C.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, N.; Dong, Z.; et al. A HST1-like gene controls tiller angle through regulating endogenous auxin in common wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2023, 21, 122–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Su, P.; Sui, C.; Li, J.; Wan, K.; Sun, H.; Wang, S.; Liu, X.; Guo, S. The Aux/IAA protein TaIAA15-1A confers drought tolerance in Brachypodium by regulating abscisic acid signal pathway. Plant Cell Rep. 2023, 42, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zeng, D.; Peng, J.; Zhang, L.; Hayden, M.J.; Rathjen, T.M.; Li, X.; Jiang, W.; Delhaize, E. Twisted Sister1: An agravitropic mutant of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) with altered root and shoot architectures. Plant J. 2025, 122, e70122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Audran-Delalande, C.; Bassa, C.; Mila, I.; Regad, F.; Zouine, M.; Bouzayen, M. Genome-Wide Identification, Functional Analysis and Expression Profiling of the Aux/IAA Gene Family in Tomato. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53, 659–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Wu, L.; Tian, Z.; Zhang, J. Functional Dissection of Auxin Response Factors in Regulating Tomato Leaf Shape Development. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Hu, J.; Israeli, A.; Ori, N.; Sun, T.-p. The Interaction between DELLA and ARF/IAA Mediates Crosstalk between Gibberellin and Auxin Signaling to Control Fruit Initiation in Tomato. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 1710–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Deng, W.; Yan, F.; Liu, M.; Wang, X.; Li, Z. Down-regulation of SlIAA15 in tomato altered stem xylem development and production of volatile compounds in leaf exudates. Plant Signal Behav 2012, 7, 911–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Su, L.; Bassa, C.; Audran, C.; Mila, I.; Cheniclet, C.; Chevalier, C.; Bouzayen, M.; Roustan, J.-P.; Chervin, C. The Auxin Sl-IAA17 Transcriptional Repressor Controls Fruit Size Via the Regulation of Endoreduplication-Related Cell Expansion. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 55, 1969–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Bassa, C.; Mila, I.; Bouzayen, M.; Audran-Delalande, C. Phenotypes Associated with Down-Regulation of Sl-IAA27 Support Functional Diversity Among Aux/IAA Family Members in Tomato. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53, 1583–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Liu, X.; Cheng, L.; Cai, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yan, X.; Liu, J.; Li, R.; Ge, S.; Wang, S.; Liu, X.; et al. A KNOTTED1-LIKE HOMEOBOX PROTEIN1–interacting transcription factor SlGATA6 maintains the auxin-response gradient to inhibit abscission. Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eadt1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Gao, J.; Cao, X.; Shi, S.; Ma, Y.; Wang, K.; Liu, S.; Chen, D.; Chen, Q.; Ma, H. Genome-wide survey of Aux/IAA gene family members in potato (Solanum tuberosum): Identification, expression analysis, and evaluation of their roles in tuber development. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 471, 320–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kloosterman, B.; Visser, R.G.F.; Bachem, C.W.B. Isolation and characterization of a novel potato Auxin/Indole-3-Acetic Acid family member (StIAA2) that is involved in petiole hyponasty and shoot morphogenesis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2006, 44, 766–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Wu, J.; Peng, Z.; Liu, S.; He, Y.; Cheng, L.; Kong, F.; Wang, J.; Lu, G. Genome-wide analysis of Aux/IAA gene family in Solanaceae species using tomato as a model. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2012, 287, 295–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Jiang, M.; Hu, H.; Kai, J.; Traw, M.B.; Yang, S.; Zhang, X. Different knockout genotypes of OsIAA23 in rice using CRISPR/Cas9 generating different phenotypes. Plant Mol. Biol. 2019, 100, 467–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Jia, S.-S.; Ren, X.-Y.; Tong, M.-N.; Jiang, S.-Y.; Zhang, C.-Q.; Liu, Q.-Q.; Li, Q.-F. OsIAA19, an Aux/IAA Family Gene, Involved in the Regulation of Seed-Specific Traits in Rice. Plants 2024, 13, 3538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Martin-Arevalillo, R.; Guillotin, B.; Schön, J.; Hugues, A.; Gerentes, M.-F.; Tang, K.; Lucas, J.; Thévenon, E.; Dreuillet, M.; Vissers, G.; et al. Synthetic deconvolution of an auxin-dependent transcriptional code. Cell 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structural and functional domains of Aux/IAA proteins.
Figure 1. Structural and functional domains of Aux/IAA proteins.
Agronomy 15 01228 g001
Figure 2. Typical mechanism of auxin signal transduction: (A) At low levels, Aux/IAA proteins form dimers with ARF, leading to the inhibition of transcriptional activity of ARF genes. (B) At high auxin levels, auxin promotes the ubiquitination and degradation of Aux/IAA through SCF. Arrows represent positive regulation, and lines ending with perpendicular bars indicate negative regulation.
Figure 2. Typical mechanism of auxin signal transduction: (A) At low levels, Aux/IAA proteins form dimers with ARF, leading to the inhibition of transcriptional activity of ARF genes. (B) At high auxin levels, auxin promotes the ubiquitination and degradation of Aux/IAA through SCF. Arrows represent positive regulation, and lines ending with perpendicular bars indicate negative regulation.
Agronomy 15 01228 g002
Figure 3. Functions of Aux/IAA genes during the growth and development of Arabidopsis.
Figure 3. Functions of Aux/IAA genes during the growth and development of Arabidopsis.
Agronomy 15 01228 g003
Figure 4. Regulatory factors of Arabidopsis Aux/IAA under drought and salt stress: (A) CaNAC46/MeAnn2-AtIAA4 enhances plant salt tolerance by regulating root growth. AtCOR5-AtIAA12/19 improves plant tolerance to salt stress by suppressing lateral root development. (B) CaNAC46-AtIAA4 regulates root growth in response to drought stress. AtDREB2A/B-AtIAA5/6/19 enhances drought resistance by maintaining GLS levels. Arrows represent positive regulation, and lines ending with vertical bars indicate negative regulation.
Figure 4. Regulatory factors of Arabidopsis Aux/IAA under drought and salt stress: (A) CaNAC46/MeAnn2-AtIAA4 enhances plant salt tolerance by regulating root growth. AtCOR5-AtIAA12/19 improves plant tolerance to salt stress by suppressing lateral root development. (B) CaNAC46-AtIAA4 regulates root growth in response to drought stress. AtDREB2A/B-AtIAA5/6/19 enhances drought resistance by maintaining GLS levels. Arrows represent positive regulation, and lines ending with vertical bars indicate negative regulation.
Agronomy 15 01228 g004
Figure 5. The functions of Aux/IAA genes during rice growth and development.
Figure 5. The functions of Aux/IAA genes during rice growth and development.
Agronomy 15 01228 g005
Figure 6. Regulatory factors of rice Aux/IAA under drought and salt stress: (A) OsIAA18/20 enhances plant salt tolerance by regulating ABA stress-responsive genes. (B) OsIAA6 improves plant drought tolerance by regulating IAA or ABA levels. OsIAA18/20 enhances plant drought tolerance by regulating ABA stress-responsive genes. Arrows represent positive regulation. The solid lines and the dotted lines indicate direct and indirect regulation, respectively.
Figure 6. Regulatory factors of rice Aux/IAA under drought and salt stress: (A) OsIAA18/20 enhances plant salt tolerance by regulating ABA stress-responsive genes. (B) OsIAA6 improves plant drought tolerance by regulating IAA or ABA levels. OsIAA18/20 enhances plant drought tolerance by regulating ABA stress-responsive genes. Arrows represent positive regulation. The solid lines and the dotted lines indicate direct and indirect regulation, respectively.
Agronomy 15 01228 g006
Figure 7. The functions of Aux/IAA genes during maize growth and development.
Figure 7. The functions of Aux/IAA genes during maize growth and development.
Agronomy 15 01228 g007
Figure 8. Regulatory factors of maize Aux/IAA under drought and salt stress: (A) The ZmbHLH32-ZmIAA9-ZmARF1 module regulates maize salt tolerance. (B) The ZmCTT-ZmIAA8 module regulates maize drought resistance by modulating auxin-responsive gene expression. Arrows represent positive regulation, and lines ending with vertical bars indicate negative regulation.
Figure 8. Regulatory factors of maize Aux/IAA under drought and salt stress: (A) The ZmbHLH32-ZmIAA9-ZmARF1 module regulates maize salt tolerance. (B) The ZmCTT-ZmIAA8 module regulates maize drought resistance by modulating auxin-responsive gene expression. Arrows represent positive regulation, and lines ending with vertical bars indicate negative regulation.
Agronomy 15 01228 g008
Table 1. Biofunctions of AUX/IAA genes in other plants.
Table 1. Biofunctions of AUX/IAA genes in other plants.
SpeciesGene NameFunctionReferences
Wheat
(Triticum aestivum)
TaIAA7Involved in regulating wheat root system development[97]
TaIAA15Positively regulates wheat drought tolerance[100]
TaIAA17Involved in regulating wheat tillering pattern[99]
TaIAA19Involved in regulating wheat’s gravitropic response process[101]
TaIAA21Regulates wheat grain size and grain weight[98]
Tomato
(Lycopersicon esculentum)
SlIAA3Involved in regulating organ abscission[108]
SlIAA9Involved in regulating tomato leaf development and fruit formation[103,104]
SlIAA15Involved in regulating tomato plant leaf and lateral root development[105]
SlIAA17Involved in regulating tomato fruit size[106]
SlIAA27Involved in tomato nutrient and reproductive growth[107]
Potato
(Solanum tuberosum)
StIAA2Involved in regulating potato plant morphology and plant height[110]
StIAA9involved in the formation and development of potato tubers[109]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhuang, Z.; Bian, J.; Ren, Z.; Ta, W.; Peng, Y. Plant Aux/IAA Gene Family: Significance in Growth, Development and Stress Responses. Agronomy 2025, 15, 1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15051228

AMA Style

Zhuang Z, Bian J, Ren Z, Ta W, Peng Y. Plant Aux/IAA Gene Family: Significance in Growth, Development and Stress Responses. Agronomy. 2025; 15(5):1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15051228

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhuang, Zelong, Jianwen Bian, Zhenping Ren, Wanling Ta, and Yunling Peng. 2025. "Plant Aux/IAA Gene Family: Significance in Growth, Development and Stress Responses" Agronomy 15, no. 5: 1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15051228

APA Style

Zhuang, Z., Bian, J., Ren, Z., Ta, W., & Peng, Y. (2025). Plant Aux/IAA Gene Family: Significance in Growth, Development and Stress Responses. Agronomy, 15(5), 1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15051228

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop