Next Article in Journal
A Fusion XGBoost Approach for Large-Scale Monitoring of Soil Heavy Metal in Farmland Using Hyperspectral Imagery
Previous Article in Journal
Transcriptomic Analysis and Identification of Candidate Genes Involved in Rhizome Development in Agropyron michnoi
Previous Article in Special Issue
Boosting Drought Tolerance in Tomatoes through Stimulatory Action of Salicylic Acid Imparted Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Foliar Application of K-Silicate and L-Cysteine Enhances Production, Quality, and Antioxidant Activities of Cape Gooseberry Fruits Under Drought Conditions

1
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan 45371-38791, Iran
2
Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan 45371-38791, Iran
3
Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry Sciences, Università degli Studi di Palermo (UNIPA), 90128 Palermo, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2025, 15(3), 675; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15030675
Submission received: 7 February 2025 / Revised: 25 February 2025 / Accepted: 4 March 2025 / Published: 10 March 2025

Abstract

:
Water deficit is a notable environmental stress, which leads to negative impacts on crop growth, resulting in yield decline. In the current experiment, the exogenous application of potassium silicate (KSi) and L-cysteine (Cys) was investigated on the productivity, qualitative, and biochemicals of Cape gooseberry fruits subjected to drought stress condition in a 2-year field experiment (2022 and 2023). Our findings indicated that deficit irrigation reduced yield, the membrane stability index, titratable acidity, and the ascorbic acid content of fruits in comparison to the untreated plants in both years. Nonetheless, MDA, H2O2, and antioxidant enzyme activities were meaningfully enhanced as a consequence of water deficit conditions. The application of KSi and Cys alleviated water deficit stress by reducing MDA accumulation and provided significantly greater content of total soluble solids, soluble carbohydrate, proline, total soluble protein, total phenols, and flavonoids. KSi and Cys have a positive influence on H2O2 accumulation by boosting the actions of antioxidant enzymes. Furthermore, higher values of Cys induced the production of proline, APX, PPO, and PAL activities, which contributed to decreasing the damaging effects of plant drought stress and led to an enhanced yield rate. Overall, the foliar application of KSi and Cys by improving antioxidant components, antioxidant enzyme activity, and proline accumulation had a positive impact on the productivity and quality of Cape gooseberries cultivated under standard and shortage irrigation levels.

1. Introduction

The cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) is a plant of the Solanaceae family, whose ripe fruit has an edible and medicinal value and contains high amounts of vitamins A, B and C; proteins; phosphorus; iron; and antioxidants [1]. It provides bioactive components that can be useful for human health and the medical industry [1] and has been considered economically as a suitable product for domestic consumption as well as export to other countries [2]. However, due to global climate change, Cape gooseberry production regions are widely prone to periods of drought and water scarcity [3].
To address the food requirements of the growing global inhabitants, enhancing agricultural production is essential, particularly in light of climate change and its exacerbating effects on abiotic stresses [4]. Water stress is a noteworthy abiotic issue that restricts global plant production by diminishing plant growth, lowering tissue water potential, reducing cell turgor, decreasing the photosynthesis rate, and compromising cell membrane stability, especially in arid and semi-arid areas [5]. Moreover, water scarcity alters the hormonal balance as a consequence of variations in plant metabolism, resulting in an enhanced biosynthesis of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can alter the normal cellular processes via oxidative stress [6]. However, plants have the capability to naturally cope with this stress via enzymatic antioxidant mechanisms, involving superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POX), or through the biosynthesis of phenolics and flavonoids, which can enhance fruit quality [7].
Previous studies on P. peruviana demonstrated that in response to deficit irrigation stress, there was an upsurge in pH, total soluble solids, vitamin C, and fruit antioxidant activity. Conversely, biomass accumulation, fruit count, and physalis yield decreased due to higher concentrations of malondialdehyde (MDA) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [3]. While plants subjected to deficit irrigation face water stress that can adversely impact their growth and performance, this method can effectively reduce water usage. Nonetheless, these stress responses may jeopardize plant production in relation to its duration and intensity, posing a significant challenge in maintaining plant performance under such conditions [8]. Terra et al. [9] have aimed to promote the use of drought-tolerant genotypes, along with biofertilizers and osmotic protectants like amino acids, to alleviate the destructive impacts of stress.
Overall, maintaining proper plant nutrition is essential for alleviating the detrimental effects of water limitations on crop yield. Potassium silicate (KSi) serves as an effective source of both K and Si in agricultural systems, primarily acting as a silica modifier while also supplying significant amounts of potassium [10]. Even though Si is not fundamental for plants [11], it has positive outcomes in agriculture to alleviate the plant inherent abiotic stresses, specifically water deficit stress [12]. Silicon improves resistance to drought stress by regulating root water uptake, decreasing transpiration, improving the antioxidative defense system, eliciting the build-up of osmolytes such as proline, regulating polyamine synthesis, and enhancing the activity of photosynthetic enzymes, all while maintaining the growth and yield of the treated plants [13]. Studies demonstrated that the foliar application of K-silicate and other nano-materials in plants subjected to water stress, could enhance the water status, firmness, metabolic and physiological performances [14], and yield [15] of cucumber; restrict the accumulation of ROS induced by drought; and significantly improve the gas exchange parameters in tomatoes [16]. Also, the use of silicon in Physalis angulata L. led to an increase in proline and phenol content [17].
Currently, the use of amino acids as biostimulants has appeared as a novel method to increase the nutritional quality of fruits and vegetables. They also enhance crop growth and yield by stimulating the metabolic pathways or activating antioxidants underneath biotic and abiotic stresses [18] to detoxify ROS and maintain membrane integrity, as well as preserve enzymes or proteins [19].
Cysteine (Cys) is a significant sulfur-containing amino acid featuring a thiol side chain, which plays a role in enzymatic reactions. This unique structure allows Cys to function as a powerful antioxidant and an effective scavenger of ROS generated under oxidative stress [20]. Additionally, Cys serves as the precursor for several functional compounds, comprising hydrogen sulfide, methionine, various vitamins, cofactors, iron–sulfur (Fe-S) clusters, and the ethylene hormone [21]. Recently, Wang et al. [22] found that the postharvest treatment with Cys in goji (Lycium barbarum L.) fruits significantly enhanced the levels of total phenolics, ascorbic acid, and total glutathione, as well as the ratio of glutathione to oxidized glutathione, enhancing the antioxidant capacity. This treatment notably reduced both decay rates and weight loss while preserving the total fruit soluble solid content. Similarly, Cys application also boosted the total phenolic in litchi fruits [23], elevated polyphenol levels in fresh-cut beets [24], and enhanced the action of superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POX) in wheat [25].
In many countries, including Iran, the importance of water conservation has resulted in sustainable agriculture practices that require fewer water resources a priority. Although the beneficial effects of biostimulant application on plants are well recognized, there are currently no definitive data clarifying the roles of KSi and Cys in Cape gooseberry fruits subjected to water deficit stress. Thus, this study wanted to assess the physiological influences of different levels of KSi and Cys in alleviating the detrimental impacts of deficit irrigation on the qualitative and biochemical traits of Cape gooseberry fruits.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design, Genetic Material, and Treatments

The field experiment was performed at the University of Zanjan, Iran, which is located at 36 degrees 40 min north longitude, 48 degrees 24 min east latitude, and an altitude of 1596 m above sea level, over two years, from May to October in 2022 and 2023. The experiment was conducted using a split-plot design with three irrigation regimes (50, 75, and 100 crop evapotranspiration percentages (%ETc)) as the main plot, three levels of potassium silicate (KSi) (500, 1000, and 1500 mg L−1), two levels of L-cysteine (Cys) (20 and 40 mg L−1) and by spraying distilled water (control) on the sub-plot in three replicates. The seeds of Cape gooseberries (Physalis peruviana L.) (“Pakan seed” company, Isfahan, Iran) were placed in the seedling trays loaded with peat moss and perlite (50:50). The seedlings were cultivated in a climate-controlled greenhouse at the University of Zanjan (day: 25 ± 2 °C; night: 20 ± 2 °C; RH: 60–70%) starting from March 15 in both 2022 and 2023. The seedlings were transplanted at the 4- to 5-leaf stage, spaced 50 cm apart in rows and 150 cm between rows. Different concentrations of treatments (KSi and Cys) were sprayed on the experimental plants only at the true 8–10th leaf stage (400 mL plant−1) until run off using a mechanical mist sprayer and continued at 15-day intervals at anthesis (800 mL plant−1), as well as fruit setting (1200 mL plant−1) stages. In this study, 3 irrigation levels were considered: 50% (I50), 75% (I75), and 100% (I100) of crop evapotranspiration (ETc). I100 was employed as the control for setting the irrigations of I50 and I75 (drought-stressed plots). The water requirements for crops were determined by the actual Cape gooseberry evapotranspiration (ETc); it was calculated as follows: ETc = ET0 × KC
Here, ET0 is the reference evapotranspiration [26] (mm day−1), and KC is the plant coefficient. The KC values were different depending on the plant stage; for initial, mid-season and the end of the season, they were considered 0.6, 1.15, and 0.9, respectively. All climatic data were collected from the meteorological station at the University of Zanjan.
Crops were watered via a drip irrigation system with tape pipes (2 L/h). The soil characteristics of the experimental fields and the climatic data are displayed in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.

2.2. Plant Productivity and Fruit Nutritional Traits

Fruits were harvested (two times during the growing cycle) once the calyx and fruits changed color from green to orange. The fruit weight per plant (from five plants per replicate) was recorded to calculate the fruit yield, expressed in kg per hectare (kg ha−1).
Six fruits, belonging to 3 plants per replicate, were casually chosen to evaluated TSS and TA contents. The fruit total soluble solids (TSSs) were assessed with a portable digital refractometer (ATago-ATC-20(E), Saitama, Japan) and expressed as °Brix. The percentage acidity (TA), as citric acid, was determined using 3 to 4 drops of phenolphthalein and titrated against 0.1N NaOH.
The ascorbic acid content in fruits (mg 100 g−1 fresh weight) was measured by analyzing six fruits from three plants per replicate for each treatment. This assessment followed the titration method outlined by Terada et al. [27].
Total soluble carbohydrates (TSCs) and total soluble proteins (TSPs) were measured from six fruits harvested from 3 plants per replicate. TSCs were assessed using the anthrone colorimetric assay [28]. For extraction, 0.5 g of fresh fruit samples was homogenized in 10 mL of 95% ethanol and centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 min. The resulting supernatant was then mixed with 1 mL of supernatant and 3 mL of anthrone, heated at 100 °C for 10 min, and cooled. A standard glucose curve was used at a detection wavelength of 625 nm to quantify TSCs, with results expressed as mg per 100 g of fresh weight. TSP content was determined using the Bradford method [29], employing a potassium phosphate-buffered solution (50 mM, pH 7.8) with EDTA (0.2 mM) and PVP (2%), using bovine serum albumin as the standard at a wavelength of 595 nm.

2.3. POX, CAT, SOD, APX, PPO, and PAL Activities

To measure the activities of antioxidant enzymes (U mg−1 protein), 2 g of frozen fruit samples was homogenized with potassium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.8) containing EDTA (0.2 mM) and PVP (2%). Following centrifugation at 12,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C, the supernatants (50 mL) were used for enzymatic assays. POX activity was measured using the guaiacol (632 μL in 12 mL distilled water) assay method, where a change of 0.01 units per minute in absorbance at 470 nm represented one unit of activity. CAT activity was appraised by monitoring the decomposition of H2O2 (541 μL in 4 mL distilled water) at 240 nm using a UV spectrophotometer [30]. SOD activity was assessed as per Giannopolitis and Ries [31], defined as the enzyme amount required to achieve 50% inhibition of nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) (61.3 mg in 50 mL) reduction at 560 nm. APX activity was measured in the presence of 2.0 mmol L−1 ascorbic acid and 2.0 mmol L−1 EDTA by recording the decrease in absorbance at 290 nm [32]. Additionally, polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) activities were evaluated according to Nguyen et al. [33] with minor modifications by using 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) and 50 mM borate buffer (pH 8), respectively.

2.4. Fruit Functional Components, Antioxidant Capacity, and the Membrane Stability Index

To assess the total phenolic (mg GAE 100 g−1 FW) and flavonoid (mg QE 100 g−1 FW) contents, six fruits belonging to 3 plants per treatment were randomly collected in triplicate. The total phenol content was assessed via the Folin–Ciocâlteu method, employing an extraction solvent of methanol/water (80:20, v/v) based on Singleton and Rossi’s procedure [34], whereas flavonoids were measured via a colorimetric method [35].
The antioxidant capacity of the fruit tissue was assessed through the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) assay [36].
The membrane stability index (MSI) of fruits was measured in four fruits belonging to three plants per replicate. The fruit samples were incubated at 40 °C for 30 min in a vial; subsequently, the electrical conductivity (EC1) of the samples was measured. The samples were then autoclaved at 120 °C for 20 min and allowed to cool to room temperature, after which a second reading (EC2) was acquired. The MSI was calculated using the following formula [37]:
MSI = (1 − EC1/EC2) × 100

2.5. Malondialdehyde, H2O2, and Proline

The malondialdehyde (MDA) content in fruits was assessed using the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) method [38] at 532 and 600 nm, and the results are expressed using the formula below as μmol per gram of fresh weight (FW).
MDA = [(A532 − A600) × W × V/155] × 1000
The hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content was measured using the potassium iodide method at 390 nm, following the procedure outlined by Alexieva et al. [39], and reported in μmol per gram of FW using a standard curve obtained from various concentrations of H2O2. Additionally, the proline content of the fruits was determined following the method established by Bates et al. [40] at 520 nm, with proline levels expressed in mg per gram of FW using a constructed standard curve.

2.6. Statistics

Statistical analysis was accomplished using a split-plot model based on a completely randomized block design, incorporating 3 irrigation levels and 6 spray treatment levels (including 3 concentrations of KSi, 2 concentrations of Cys, and control treatments), with 3 replications for each combination. Data were processed through the SAS 9.4 statistical software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), and means were compared using Duncan’s multiple range test at a significance level of p = 0.05. Before analysis, ANOVA assumptions (the Shapiro–Wilk and Levene tests) were accomplished. Results were presented as means with standard errors (n = 3). Additionally, Pearson’s correlation analysis was conducted using the SPSS software version 25.0 for Windows to explore the relationship between yield and quality measurements collected over two years.

3. Results

Plant Productivity and Fruit Nutritional Traits

Data from 2022 and 2023 indicated that irrigation regimes and treatments with KSi and Cys significantly (p ≤ 0.01) affected the fruit yield of Cape gooseberries (Figure 1A,B). Based on the results, reducing irrigation from 100 to 50% ETc caused a 39% reduction in yield over both years. The yield of crops obtained from the first year was significantly (p ≤ 0.01) higher than the second year. The fruit yield per plant was lower under deficit irrigation in both treated and control plants. In both years, the foliar spray of KSi and Cys significantly increased fruit yield under well and deficit irrigation conditions. In 2022 as well as 2023, the foliar spray of Cys 40 mg L−1 under 100% and 75% ETc, respectively, showed the highest fruit yield. So, the application of Cys 40 mg L−1 resulted in a 64.6% increase and a 58.85% increase in fruit yield under 100% ETc and 75% ETc, respectively, in 2022 and 2023.
Cape gooseberry fruits exhibited significantly higher TSS content in the first year compared to the second one (p ≤ 0.01) (Figure 2A,B). The application of KSi and Cys increased TSS levels above those of the control in both years, with a more notable effect in the first year, as Cys increased TSS content by 21.62%, and KSi contributed to a 13.51% increase. In the first year, TSS content decreased under 50% ETc deficit irrigation, while no significant variations in TSS were noticed between irrigation regimes in the second year (Figure 2B). The highest TSS values (15.75 and 15.7 °Brix) were recorded in plants supplied with Cys 20 and 40 mg L−1 under 50% ETc in 2022, which was an increase of 21.6% compared to the control treatment (Figure 2A). As reported in Figure 2C,D, the TA content of fruits exhibited no significant difference between the two years (p ≤ 0.05). Irrigation significantly affect the TA content, which increased with deficit irrigation in treated and control plants. Due to the foliar application of KSi and Cys, increases of 46.6 and 8.5% in 2022 and 19.6 and 21.3% in 2023 were observed in the TA content under 100% ETc, respectively. According to the results, it can be reported that KSi in 2022 and Cys in 2023 were more effective than other treatments. The highest values of TA (3.09 and 3.08%) were obtained with KSi 1000 mg L−1 under 75% ETc and KSi 500 mg L−1 under full irrigation (I100) in 2022.
As reported in Figure 3A,B, in both years, the ascorbic acid content of Cape gooseberry fruits significantly decreased by reducing the irrigation levels in the treated and control plants (p ≤ 0.01). The results indicate that by reducing irrigation from 100% ETc to 50% ETc, the ascorbic acid content decreased by 36.12% in 2022 and by 25.24% in 2023.
Throughout both years, the application of KSi and Cys improved the ascorbic acid content under full and deficit irrigation circumstances. In both years, the maximum amount of ascorbic acid was significantly (p ≤ 0.01) observed in plant supplied with KSi 1000 mg L−1 under full irrigation (I100) (Figure 3A,B).
According to the results (Figure 4A,B), water deficit irrigation meaningfully (p ≤ 0.01) boosted the fruits’ total soluble carbohydrate content (TSC) in both years. In both years, KSi and Cys treatments significantly increased the TCS value under full irrigation (I100) and deficit irrigation (I75 and I50). By reducing irrigation from 100% ETc to 50% ETc, the TSP and TSC increased by 38.3 and 80%, respectively. Additionally, applying KSi on the leaves further enhanced these increases to 83.06% for TSP and 116.54% for TSC in 2023. Generally, the TSC content in first year (2022) was considerably higher than that of second year (2023), so the highest TSC content (33.76 mg g−1 FW) was obtained in plant fruits treated with KSi 1500 mg L−1 under 50% ETc in the second year.
Different trends for total soluble protein (TSP) (Figure 4C,D) were observed in this study. The fruits obtained from the first year had greater TSP values than those from the second year. In the first year, the irrigation and foliar application of KSi and Cys had no significant difference on fruit TSP content. While in the second year, deficit irrigation significantly increased TSP content. Also, the fruit TPS content increased due to the foliar application of KSi and Cys in 2023. The effects of KSi and Cys were dependent on the treatment concentration and irrigation levels, where the highest content of TSP (3.24%) was detected with the foliar supply of 1500 mg L−1 KSi under deficit irrigation 50% ETc in 2023 (Figure 4).
CAT activity showed higher values in 2023 than in 2022 (Figure 5A,B). In both years, deficit irrigation showed no significant influence on CAT activity compared to the control; however in 2023, deficit irrigation 50% ETc significantly increased CAT activity compared to all other irrigation levels. In the first year, the foliar application of KSi and Cys had no significant effect on CAT activity under full and deficit irrigation. But in 2023, the CAT activity was elicited with the foliar application of KSi and Cys. In general, the highest CAT activity (17.32 and 16.61 U mg−1 protein) was found in the fruits of plants sprayed with 40 mg L−1 Cys and 1500 mg L−1 KSi, respectively, under deficit irrigation 50% ETc in 2023 (Figure 5A,B).
Different trends were observed for POX enzyme activity. In both years, deficit irrigation increased POX activity compared to full irrigation. Also, the enhancement in KSi and Cys treatments resulted in a boost in POX activity in both years. So, the highest activity of POX (11.58 U mg−1 protein) was obtained in 1500 mg L−1 KSi under deficit irrigation 50% ETc during 2022 (Figure 5C,D).
Similar to CAT, SOD activity was significantly higher in 2023 than in 2022 (Figure 5E,F). In 2023, with increasing deficit irrigation, the SOD activity significantly increased. However, in 2022, under deficit irrigation 75% ETc, the SOD activity increased compared to full irrigation and then decreased under deficit irrigation 50% ETc. In general, the application of KSi and Cys significantly enhanced SOD activity compared to the control in both years, and KSi and Cys impact on SOD activity was influenced by the concentration of treatments. The maximum SOD activity was obtained from plants that received treatment with 40 and 20 mg L−1 Cys under deficit irrigation 50 and 75% ETc in 2023 (Figure 5E,F).
In both years, the increase in deficit irrigation, as well as KSi and Cys concentrations, promoted an increase in fruit APX enzyme activity, and no noticeable change in APX activity was observed between the two years (Figure 6A,B). While KSi application initially increased APX activity up to 1000 mg L−1, a decrease was noted at higher concentrations. The peak values (86.09 and 83.02 U mg−1 protein) of APX activity were recorded at 500 and 1000 mg L−1 KSi under deficit irrigation 50% ETc in 2022, which was significant similar to 1000 mg L−1 KSi and 40 mg L−1 Cys under 50% ETc in 2023.
In both years, PPO activity increased as the deficit irrigation became more severe, without any significant difference between the two years (Figure 6C,D). The impacts of KSi and Cys effects on PPO activity were related to treatment concentrations and irrigation regimes. Here, the maximum PPO activity (0.75 U mg−1 protein) was found in the fruits of plants supplied with 40 mg L−1 Cys under deficit irrigation 50% ETc in 2023.
PAL activity was significantly higher in 2023 than 2022. In 2022, 50% ETc significantly boosted PPO activity compared to full irrigation, whereas in 2023, it showed no significant difference on PPO activity among irrigation regimes. In both years, the foliar application of KSi and Cys considerably increased the fruits’ PPO activity (Figure 6E,F).
As indicated in Figure 7, the total phenol and flavonoid fruit concentrations in 2023 were significantly higher than those of 2022. Deficit irrigation noticeably increased total phenolic content compared to full irrigation during the two years.
A significant difference (p ≤ 0.01) in fruits total phenol was noted across various levels of KSi and Cys applications in both years. The effects of these treatments varied based on their concentrations, with the highest phenol values (15.27 and 15.07 mg GAE 100 g FW−1) recorded at 500 and 1500 mg L−1 KSi under 50% ETc deficit irrigation in 2023 (Figure 7B).
The data highlighted that deficit irrigation had no significant influence on the flavonoid content in the first year (2022). By contrast, in the second year (2023), deficit irrigation significantly boosted the total flavonoid content of fruits. In both 2022 and 2023, the flavonoid content increased with KSi and Cys supply (Figure 7C,D). The highest value of flavonoids (2.98 mg QE 100 g−1 FW) was acquired in plants supplied with 1500 mg L−1 KSi under deficit irrigation 75% ETc in 2023 (Figure 7D).
As shown in Figure 7E,F, the antioxidant activity (AA) of fruits showed no significant difference between the two years. Antioxidant activity did not significantly vary under different irrigation treatments in the first year, whereas it significantly improved under deficit irrigation (I50 and I75) compared to full irrigation (I100) in 2023. Furthermore, AA was significantly higher in fruits from plants treated with KSi and Cys compared to control plants, although no significant difference was found in the first year in the AA among KSi and Cys treatment levels under irrigation regimes 100 and 75% ETc.
Based on the results presented in Figure 8A,B, the membrane stability index (MSI) of cape gooseberry fruits was significantly different between the two years (p ≤ 0.01). It was observed that irrigation deficit led to a notable reduction in MSI in both years. Nonetheless, the use of KSi and Cys treatments significantly relieved the negative effect of deficit irrigation, resulting in ameliorated MSI. The highest MSI value was achieved in fruits treated with KSi 1500 mg L−1 and Cys 40 and 20 mg L−1 under irrigation 100% ETC, which showed no significant differences compared to lower concentrations of KSi and control treatments (Figure 8A,B).
MDA and H2O2 accumulation increased linearly in response to the intensification of water deficit stress in both years (Figure 8C–F). The foliar spray of KSi and Cys significantly lowered MDA and H2O2 contents in comparison with the control plants under all irrigation conditions. The fruits of plants supplied with Cys 20 mg L−1 and KSi 500 and 1000 mg L−1 under irrigation 100% ETc in 2022 were observed to have the lowest MDA accumulation (Figure 8C,D). A remarkable inhibition outcome on H2O2 accumulation was observed in fruits treated with Cys 40 mg L−1 (p < 0.01) under 100% ETc in 2022 (Figure 8E,F).
The proline content of fruits increased with increasing deficit irrigation stress (Figure 9). Also, the foliar spray of KSi and Cys significantly increased proline accumulation compared to the control. Differences between the two years showed no significant impact on the proline content of fruits. The highest (1.99 mg g−1 FW) value of proline was found when KSi 1500 mg L−1 was applied under 50% ETc in first year, which had no significant difference with Cys and lower concentrations of KSi at deficit irrigation 50% ETc in both years (Figure 9A,B).

4. Discussion

Similar to our results, water deficit significantly decreased growth, dry matter content, and yield in chickpeas [41] and tomatoes [42]. This decrease in growth and yield is attributed to reduced absorption of essential nutrients, resulting in decreased leaf area, chlorophyll content, and, ultimately, photosynthesis [42]. Plants can reply to stressful conditions via different morphological, physiological, and biochemical mechanisms, including antioxidant activity and osmolyte accumulation to mitigate ROS buildup, which can lead to decreased fruit yield [43]. Additionally, water stress during flowering and pollination can reduce fruit set percentage by causing pollen desiccation and male floral abortion, further impacting yield [44]. In the same way, the data of this study denoted a negative correlation between yield and TSC content, total phenols and flavonoids, DPPH-scavenging activity (AA), antioxidant enzyme (CAT, POX, SOD, PPO, and PAL) activities, and MDA and H2O2 accumulation, whereas it has a positive relation with the ascorbic acid content of fruits (Table 3). Silicon application enhances plant resistance to stress by regulating various physiological and biochemical processes, like the regulation of the levels of defense enzymes, antioxidant defense, osmolytes regulation, and phytohormone regulation (decrease ethylene and ABA and increase GA and polyamine (PA)), potentially improving yield attributes [45]. Like our findings, Elkelish et al. [25] demonstrated that Cys treatments ameliorate drought-induced oxidative damage while enhancing photosynthetic pigments, osmolyte accumulation, and antioxidant activity, potentially leading to increased yield. Moreover, Sarojnee et al. [46] found that amino acid application significantly improved various yield-related traits in pepper plants compared to control plants.
Deficit irrigation meaningfully enhanced the fruits’ TA and TSS content. This improvement could be related to a reduction in fruit juice content [47], a phenomenon also observed in tomatoes [48], Physalis angulate [49], and bell peppers [50]. It is indicated that plants increase TSS levels as a strategy to control osmosis and cope with stress [51]. Severe water stress has also been associated with notable increases in TA, as observed in grapes [52] and strawberries [53]. In our study, the use of KSi and Cys helped maintain the TSS and TA levels in cape gooseberry fruits. Similarly, in tomatoes subjected to drought stress, Si application enhanced both TSS and TA content, which can be attributed to the decrease of respiration and the maintenance of C/N ratios [54]. In addition, maintaining optimal levels of TSS and TA and preventing TA degradation in fruits treated with L-cysteine may suppress the conversion of starch to simple sugars [23], a phenomenon seen in litchi [23] and longan fruits [55]. In this study, there was no significant correlation among fruit TSS and TA contents (Table 3). As illustrated in Table 3, a positive correlation was indicated between TSP content; POX, SOD, and APX activities; and proline accumulation with TSS content. Likewise, the positive correlation between TA, TSC, proline content, antioxidant components, and the activity of antioxidant enzyme activity was evident in this study (Table 3).
In the present trial, deficit irrigation significantly decreased the ascorbic acid content of cape gooseberry fruits compared to well-watered ones, impacting their defense against oxidative stress; this agrees with the data by Abdelhamid et al. [56] in faba beans. As observed in previous research, water stress results in a reduction in ascorbic acid content in tomatoes, attributed to increased respiration and consumption of organic acids. However, the foliar application of Si maintained the ascorbic acid content by reducing respiration [54]. Ascorbic acid content, located in chloroplasts, helps mitigate oxidative stress during photosynthesis and serves as a primary substrate for the enzymatic detoxification of hydrogen peroxide, protecting against oxidative damage [56]. Additionally, Si application enhanced ascorbic acid levels in various plants such as tomatoes [57], coriander [58], and strawberries [59], possibly through adjustments in the phenylpropanoid pathway [60]. Such results pointed out the critical role of inorganic elements like Si in enhancing fruit quality and antioxidative capacity [61]. Results indicated a negative correlation among ascorbic acid content with POX, PPO enzyme activities, DPPH scavenging capacity (AA), and MDA and H2O2 accumulation (Table 3). However, a positive relation was found between ascorbic acid content, MSI, and fruit yield (Table 3).
The increased TSC content in the second year could be attributed to water deficit stress, possibly intensified by reduced relative humidity and rainfall in 2023 during harvest time (October) [47]. In the case of pistachios, Pakzad et al. [62] observed a similar increase in TSC and TPS values when exposed to drought stress. Additionally, reduced carbohydrate consumption due to a lower photosynthesis rate may contribute to the accumulation of TSC under abiotic stress [63]. The plant’s capacity to sustain growth and avoid cell death under severe stress situations is improved by increasing osmotic regulation through the accumulation of carbohydrates and protecting biomolecules [64]. Cells maintain turgor pressure in water stress conditions by accumulating osmotic regulators like soluble sugars, proline, and soluble proteins to sustain normal physiological activities [65]. Also, an increase in TSP content under water deficit is attributed to the production of new proteins or the upregulation of stress-adaptive proteins, including antioxidant enzymes [66]. Our results showed that foliar treatments, especially KSi, led to a significant increase in TSC and TSP values (Figure 4). In agreement with our results, Si application caused an enhancement of TSP, free amino acids, and, ultimately, the yield of rice [67]. Si enhances photosynthetic pigments, rubisco enzyme activity, and photosynthetic capacity while reducing oxidative stress and protecting macromolecules such as proteins, chloroplast membranes, and cell membranes, thus promoting photosynthesis and increasing soluble sugars and protein levels in plants [68]. Manivannan and Ahn [69] demonstrated that Si up-regulates osNAC proteins, which play key roles in stress tolerance, proline synthesis, and carbohydrate biosynthesis. As show up in Table 3, a negative correlation was indicated between TSP; total phenols and flavonoids; CAT, SOD, PPO, and PAL enzyme activities; MSI; and MDA content. However, extremely positive significant relations were evident between TSP, TSS (r = 0.49), APX activity (r = 0.29), and proline (r = 0.33) accumulation. Similarly, El-Sayed et al. [70] observed increased TSC content in tomato fruits treated with KSi under water deficit stress, consistent with our findings. Furthermore, studies on fenugreek seedlings showed that silicate and silicon nanoparticle applications enhanced protein synthesis, possibly through the expression of the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) gene in roots and leaves, which in turn influences nitrogenous complexes like proteins [71]. Contrary to TSP, the results revealed highly significant positive correlations between antioxidant components, antioxidant enzymes, antioxidant activity (p < 0.01), MSI, and MDA content (p < 0.05). It is worth mentioning that although the correlation between TSP and TSC content was not significant, the existence of a negative correlation between them was clear (Table 3).
Water deficit induces oxidative damage, primarily through the biosynthesis of ROS. However, plants tolerate water stress by inducing defense responses and altering cell metabolism as an innate mechanism [72]. Both enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defense systems have a role in these mechanisms to safeguard cells from oxidative damage [73]. In agreement with our data, previous experiments in almonds and tomatoes have shown increased antioxidant enzyme activities, including SOD, CAT, POX, glutathione reductase (GR), and APX, in response to water deficit [54,74]. The results of this experiment indicated that KSi and Cys treatments under deficit irrigation led to higher antioxidant enzyme activity. The increase in POX and SOD activities following KSi treatments is consistent with previous research showing increased POX activity in asparagus [75], SOD activity in maize [76], and CAT and SOD activities in tomatoes [77]. Silicon acts as a mediator in reducing water stress in various plant species by activating antioxidant defense systems and stimulating osmolyte accumulation [78]. Research showed that Si supply positively affects fruit yield and reduces the buildup of MDA and H2O2 by enhancing antioxidant enzyme activities during water stress in rice [79] and tomatoes [16], compared with the control. They found that decreasing H2O2 content may reflect higher antioxidant enzyme activity under deficit irrigation. According to Table 3, a substantial negative correlation was recorded between antioxidant enzyme activity and H2O2 accumulation. In this respect, an improvement in antioxidant enzymes via Ksi [80,81] and Cys application [82,83,84] in various plant species was reported.
Furthermore, our findings (Table 3) showed strong positive correlations between antioxidant components, antioxidant enzymes, and antioxidant activity. Thus, it is suggested that Cys and KSi may reduce ROS damage by enhancing antioxidant content and enzyme activity.
Several studies have reported that phenolic compounds, like flavonoids, are the main source of antioxidant activity over the past few years [85]. Based on the results (Figure 7), total phenol, flavonoid content, and antioxidant activity significantly (p < 0.01) increased in 2023 compared to 2022. The natural climatic variations that occur over the years may be the cause of these differences [86]. Low temperatures enhance the synthesis of phenolics and flavonoids by increasing the activity of the phenylpropanoid pathway, which relies on higher PAL activity [87]. So, in the current study, a reduction in average temperature and sunshine hours during fruit set and ripening (August and September) (Table 2) can be the reason for this increase. Similar data are reported by Khani et al. [88] in lettuce, where total phenolic and flavonoid content, along with antioxidant activity, increased because of a high correlation among total phenol and flavonoid content with DPPH-scavenging activity (AA) under deficit irrigation compared to control plants. Their accumulation enhances plant tolerance to water deficit stress by strengthening antioxidant capacity [7] and serving as a carbon sink under stress [89].
Antioxidants, found in both enzymatic and non-enzymatic forms across cellular compartments, stabilize cells by scavenging the excess of ROS [90]. The phenylpropanoid pathway, which synthesizes phenolic compounds and flavonoids derived from phenylalanine, is essential for resisting oxidative damage produced by water deficit stress [91]. These pathways are dependent on photosynthesis, as plants undergo changes in carbon metabolism to balance biomass production by forming defense compounds under stress [92]. In the same way, total phenols and flavonoids were relatively enhanced by the KSi and Cys treatments under deficit irrigation, which was perhaps due to the great incitement of the phenylpropanoid pathway under stress conditions. Si application significantly caused the synthesis of these components in oat plants under stress conditions [93], which is consistence with our results. Additionally, the increase in phenol and flavonoid contents by Cys could be ascribed to the increment of the rate of photosynthesis [25]. In general, photosynthesis mediated with Si under drought stress conditions is related with higher levels of photosynthetic pigments and the activity of specific photosynthetic enzymes [94]. Additionally, Asgari et al. [95] observed SiNPs up-regulating PAL gene expression, leading to increased flavonoids, total phenols, and antioxidant capacity. In this study, it was apparent that there was a correlation between phenols, flavonoid content, antioxidant activity, and PAL activity (Table 3).
Moreover, as shown in Table 3, a negative correlation was indicated between antioxidant components with yield, TSP, and H2O2 content. The relations between total phenol, yield, TSP, and H2O2 content were −0.26, −0.32, and −0.34 (p < 0.01) respectively. Furthermore, this study showed a substantial negative correlation between DPPH scavenging capacity (AA), yield, and vitamin C content (r = −0.56 and r = −0.33, respectively) (Table 3).
Analogous data were also demonstrated in tomatoes [96] and canola [97] under deficit irrigation. Water deficit stress causes oxidative damage by increasing the buildup of ROS such as H2O2 and O2−, lipid peroxidation, and electrolyte leakage. The increase in ROS accumulation and as a result lipid peroxidation is associated with improved lipoxygenase and protease activities, leading to structural and functional changes in proteins and fatty acids [98]. Additionally, MDA accumulation acts as a marker of oxidative stress resulting from membrane lipid peroxidation and reflects the level of acclimatization of water-stressed plants [99]. Excessive H2O2 and MDA accumulation reduce membrane stability and cellular functioning, hindering processes such as mineral uptake, assimilation, and photosynthesis in tomato plants [100]. The present study revealed a significant negative correlation between electrolyte leakage and H2O2 (r = 0.509) (Table 3). An increase in MDA and H2O2 was positively correlated with the electrolyte leakage rate.
Our results indicated that KSi and Cys treatments under deficit irrigation exhibited higher MSI levels and lower levels of MDA and H2O2, indicating reduced membrane permeability and the prevention of membrane fatty acid peroxidation, which is in line with the results reported in litchi [23], plums [84], wheat [101], and strawberries [102] following Cys and KSi applications, respectively. Silicon deposition in the cuticle enhances membrane stability, reducing transpiration loss, especially under water deficit [103]. Additionally, Si can help alleviate oxidative damage in plants that grow in stressed environments by enhancing antioxidant activities [104]. The results indicated a negative correlation among H2O2 content with TSS, TSC, proline, vitamin C, MSI, yield, and antioxidant activity (phenols, flavonoids, CAT, SOD, and PAL). Also, a positive relation was found between MDA and H2O2 accumulation (Table 3).
Similar to our results, proline content was increased in Lactuca sativa [105] and okra [106] under deficit irrigation. Plants improve their antioxidant systems and accumulate osmolytes to scavenge excess ROS, thereby protecting their metabolic processes [43]. Osmolytes like proline, glycine betaine, and soluble sugars play critical functions in preserving water potential, safeguarding enzyme activity, and mitigating stress [107].
Acting as an osmotic regulator, proline efficiently mitigates the detrimental results of stress by stabilizing membranes and macromolecules and scavenging free radicals due to its rich carbon and nitrogen content [108]. In line with the data of present research, the foliar spray of Si increased the accumulation of proline in strawberries [102], sugar beets [109], and basil [110] under water stress conditions. They showed that the positive effects of Si on reducing water deficit stress may be due to the increase in proline content by improving the expression of genes involved in proline synthesis (P5CS) in Si-treated fruits [111]. This effect of silicon on osmolyte accumulation, particularly proline, contributes to improved water stress tolerance in plants [110]. Some studies have illustrated the beneficial impact of Si on physiological activities, nutrient levels, and osmo-regulators, ultimately enhancing plant growth and stress tolerance under water deficit conditions [112]. Results indicated a strong positive correlation between proline content, TSS, TA, TSC, TSP, phenol content, and antioxidant enzymes activities, whereas it had a negative relation with H2O2 and the yield of fruits (Table 3).
In summary, the exogenous application of KSi and Cys, particularly at higher concentrations, presents a viable strategy for mitigating the adverse effects of deficit irrigation in Cape gooseberry plants. Future research focused on optimizing application strategies will be critical for unlocking the full potential of these compounds, ultimately enhancing agricultural productivity and economic returns for growers.

5. Conclusions

The findings of this study underscore the significant role of KSi and Cys in mitigating the adverse effects of water deficit stress on Cape gooseberry plants. The application of KSi and Cys not only improved fruit yield but also enhanced qualitative traits by promoting the biosynthesis of total phenols and flavonoids while simultaneously up-regulating antioxidant enzyme activities. This resulted in reduced oxidative stress markers, such as MDA and H2O2, and improved membrane stability by maintaining osmotic balance through adjustments in proline, TSC, and TSP. According to these results, we can confirm that the exogenous use of KSi and Cys, especially at higher concentrations, could potentially be beneficial in mitigating deficit irrigation damages and improving quality and yield in Cape gooseberry plants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Software; Super-vision; Validation; Visualization; Writing—original draft; Writing—review and editing, T.B.; Formal analysis, Investigation; Methodology, Writing-original draft, A.K.; Methodology, J.N.; Writing—review and editing, L.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

All the data are included in this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported here.

References

  1. Puente, L.; Vega-Gálvez, A.; Fuentes, I.; Stucken, K.; Rodríguez, A.; Pastén, A. Effects of drying methods on the characterization of fatty acids, bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity in a thin layer of physalis (Physalis peruviana L.) pulp. J. Food Technol. 2021, 58, 1470–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fischer, G.; Melgarejo, L. The ecophysiology of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.)—An Andean fruit crop: A review. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortícolas 2020, 14, 76–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Reyes, S.M.R.; Hoyos, G.R.; Júnior, D.D.C.F.; Cecílio Filho, A.B.; Fonseca, L.P.M. Physiological response of Physalis peruviana L. seedlings inoculated with Funneliformis mosseae under drought stress. Rev. Ciênc. Agrár. 2019, 42, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rodrigues, J.; Inzé, D.; Nelissen, H.; Saibo, N.J. Source—Sink regulation in crops under water deficit. Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24, 652–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kapoor, D.; Bhardwaj, S.; Landi, M.; Sharma, A.; Ramakrishnan, M.; Sharma, A. The impact of drought in plant metabolism: How to exploit tolerance mechanisms to increase crop production. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sharma, A.; Wang, J.; Xu, D.; Tao, S.; Chong, S.; Yan, D.; Li, Z.; Yuan, H.; Zheng, B. Melatonin regulates the functional components of photosynthesis, antioxidant system, gene expression, and metabolic pathways to induce drought resistance in grafted Carya cathayensis plants. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 713, 136675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Farooq, A.; Bukhari, S.A.; Akram, N.A.; Ashraf, M.; Wijaya, L.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Ahmad, P. Exogenously applied ascorbic acid-mediated changes in osmoprotection and oxidative defense system enhanced water stress tolerance in different cultivars of safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.). Plants 2020, 9, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Leite, R.D.S.; Navarro, S.H.; Nascimento, M.N.D.; Potosme, N.M.R.; Silva, A.L.D.; Santos, R.D.J. Proline and sodium nitroprusside increase the tolerance of Physalis peruviana L. plants to water deficit through chemical priming. Ciênc. Agrotec. 2022, 46, e004622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Terra, T.G.R.; Leal, T.C.A.D.B.; Rangel, P.H.N.; Oliveira, A.B.D. Drought tolerance traits in genotypes from an upland rice core collection. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2015, 50, 788–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, D.; Cao, B.; Wang, S.; Liu, P.; Deng, X.; Yin, L.; Zhang, S. Silicon moderated the K deficiency by improving the plant-water status in sorghum. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, W.; Xie, Z.; Wang, L.; Li, M.; Lang, D.; Zhang, X. Silicon alleviates salt and drought stress of Glycyrrhiza uralensis seedling by altering antioxidant metabolism and osmotic adjustment. J. Plant Res. 2017, 130, 611–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Flores, R.A.; Arruda, E.M.; Souza Junior, J.P.D.; de Mello Prado, R.; Santos, A.C.A.D.; Aragao, A.S.; Pedreira, N.G.; da Costa, C.F. Nutrition and production of Helianthus annuus in a function of application of leaf silicon. J. Plant Nutr. 2019, 42, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Malhotra, C.; Kapoor, R.T. Silicon: A sustainable tool in abiotic stress tolerance in plants. In Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance: Agronomic, Molecular and Biotechnological Approaches; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 333–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ouzounidou, G.; Giannakoula, A.; Ilias, I.; Zamanidis, P. Alleviation of drought and salinity stresses on growth, physiology, biochemistry and quality of two Cucumis sativus L. cultivars by Si application. Rev. Bras. Bot. 2016, 39, 531–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alsaeedi, A.; El-Ramady, H.; Alshaal, T.; El-Garawany, M.; Elhawat, N.; Al-Otaibi, A. Silica nanoparticles boost growth and productivity of cucumber under water deficit and salinity stresses by balancing nutrients uptake. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 139, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cao, B.L.; Ma, Q.; Xu, K. Silicon restrains drought-induced ROS accumulation by promoting energy dissipation in leaves of tomato. Protoplasma 2020, 257, 537–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tavakoli, M.M.; Zahedi, B.; Roosta, H.R. The Effect of Silicon and LED Light on Increasing the Resistance to Salinity-Alkalinity Stress in Physalis angulata L. J. Soil Plant Interact.-Isfahan Univ. Technol. 2022, 13, 45–60. [Google Scholar]
  18. Portu, J.; López, R.; Santamaría, P.; Garde-Cerdán, T. Elicitation with methyl jasmonate supported by precursor feeding with phenylalanine: Effect on Garnacha grape phenolic content. Food Chem. 2017, 237, 416–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Talukder, M.R.; Asaduzzaman, M.; Tanaka, H.; Asao, T. Light-emitting diodes and exogenous amino acids application improve growth and yield of strawberry plants cultivated in recycled hydroponics. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 239, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Genisel, M.; Erdal, S.; Kizilkaya, M. The mitigating effect of cysteine on growth inhibition in salt-stressed barley seeds is related to its own reducing capacity rather than its effects on antioxidant system. Plant Growth Regul. 2015, 75, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Haag, A.F.; Kerscher, B.; Dall’Angelo, S.; Sani, M.; Longhi, R.; Baloban, M.; Wilson, H.M.; Mergaert, P.; Zanda, M.; Ferguson, G.P. Role of cysteine residues and disulfide bonds in the activity of a legume root nodule-specific, cysteine-rich peptide. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 10791–10798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, J.; Wei, L.; Yan, L.; Zheng, H.; Liu, C.; Zheng, L. Effects of postharvest cysteine treatment on sensory quality and contents of bioactive compounds in goji fruit. Food Chem. 2022, 366, 130546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ali, S.; Khan, A.S.; Malik, A.U. Postharvest L-cysteine application delayed pericarp browning, suppressed lipid peroxidation and maintained antioxidative activities of litchi fruit. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2016, 121, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Preczenhak, A.P.; Orsi, B.; Lima, G.P.P.; Tezotto-Uliana, J.V.; Minatel, I.O.; Kluge, R.A. Cysteine enhances the content of betalains and polyphenols in fresh-cut red beet. Food Chem. 2019, 286, 600–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Elkelish, A.; El-Mogy, M.M.; Niedbała, G.; Piekutowska, M.; Atia, M.A.; Hamada, M.M.; Shahin, M.; Mukherjee, S.; El-Yazied, A.A.; Shebl, M.; et al. Roles of exogenous α-lipoic acid and cysteine in mitigation of drought stress and restoration of grain quality in wheat. Plants 2021, 10, 2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Allen, R.G.; Pereira, L.S.; Raes, D.; Smith, M. Crop evapotranspiration Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Fao Rome 1998, 300, D05109. [Google Scholar]
  27. Terada, M.; Watanabe, Y.; Kunitomo, M.; Hayashi, E. Differential rapid analysis of ascorbic acid and ascorbic acid 2-sulfate by dinitrophenylhydrazine method. Anal. Biochem. 1978, 84, 604–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Irigoyen, J.J.; Einerich, D.W.; Sánchez-Díaz, M. Water stress induced changes in concentrations of proline and total soluble sugars in nodulated alfalfa (Medicago sativa) plants. Physiol. Plant. 1992, 84, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, Z.; Huber, D.J.; Rao, J. Antioxidant systems of ripening avocado (Persea americana Mill.) fruit following treatment at the preclimacteric stage with aqueous 1-methylcyclopropene. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2013, 76, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Giannopolitis, C.N.; Ries, S.K. Superoxide dismutases: I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant physiol. 1977, 59, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nakano, Y.; Asada, K. Purification of ascorbate peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts; its inactivation in ascorbate-depleted medium and reactivation by monodehydroascorbate radical. Plant Cell Physiol. 1987, 28, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nguyen, T.B.T.; Ketsa, S.; Van Doorn, W.G. Relationship between browning and the activities of polyphenoloxidase and phenylalanine ammonia lyase in banana peel during low temperature storage. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2003, 30, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Singleton, V.L.; Rossi, J.A. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1965, 16, 144–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhishen, J.; Mengcheng, T.; Jianming, W. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem. 1999, 64, 555–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dehghan, G.; Khoshkam, Z. Tin (II)-quercetin complex: Synthesis, spectral characterisation and antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 2012, 131, 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, J.Y.; He, L.H.; Jiang, Y.M.; Wang, Y.; Joyce, D.C.; Ji, Z.L.; Lu, W.J. Role of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase in heat pretreatment-induced chilling tolerance in banana fruit. Physiol. Plant. 2008, 132, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yi, C.; Jiang, Y.; Shi, J.; Qu, H.; Duan, X.; Yang, B.; Prasad, N.K.; Liu, T. Effect of adenosine triphosphate on changes of fatty acids in harvested litchi fruit infected by Peronophythora litchii. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2009, 54, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alexieva, V.; Sergiev, I.; Mapelli, S.; Karanov, E. The effect of drought and ultraviolet radiation on growth and stress markers in pea and wheat. Plant Cell Environ. 2001, 24, 1337–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bates, L.S.; Waldren, R.P.A.; Teare, I.D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant soil. 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gaafar, R.M.; Seyam, M.M.; El-Shanshory, A.R. Expression patterns of drought-related miRNAs in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under drought stress. Egypt. J. Bot. 2022, 62, 227–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Atilgan, A.; Rolbiecki, R.; Saltuk, B.; Jagosz, B.; Arslan, F.; Erdal, I.; Aktas, H. Deficit Irrigation Stabilizes Fruit Yield and Alters Leaf Macro and Micronutrient Concentration in Tomato Cultivation in Greenhouses: A Case Study in Turkey. J. Agron. 2022, 12, 2950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Begum, N.; Ahanger, M.A.; Zhang, L. AMF inoculation and phosphorus supplementation alleviates drought induced growth and photosynthetic decline in Nicotiana tabacum by up-regulating antioxidant metabolism and osmolyte accumulation. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 176, 104088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. García-Garizábal, I.; Causapé, J.; Abrahao, R. Application of the irrigation land environmental evaluation tool for flood irrigation management and evaluation of water use. Catena 2011, 87, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ahire, M.L.; Mundada, P.S.; Nikam, T.D.; Bapat, V.A.; Penna, S. Multifaceted roles of silicon in mitigating environmental stresses in plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 169, 291–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sarojnee, D.Y.; Navindra, B.; Chandrabose, S. Effect of naturally occurring amino acid stimulants on the growth and yield of hot peppers. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2009, 5, 414–424. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang, H.; Xiong, Y.; Huang, G.; Xu, X.; Huang, Q. Effects of water stress on processing tomatoes yield, quality and water use efficiency with plastic mulched drip irrigation in sandy soil of the Hetao Irrigation District. Agric. Water Manag. 2017, 179, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Shao, G.C.; Deng, S.; Liu, N.; Wang, M.H.; She, D.L. Fruit quality and yield of tomato as influenced by rain shelters and deficit irrigation. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2018, 17, 691–704. [Google Scholar]
  49. Leite, R.D.S.; Nascimento, M.D.; Tanan, T.T.; Ramos, C.D.S.; Gonçalves Neto, L.P.; Guimarães, D.S. Physiological responses of Physalis angulata plants to water deficit. J. Agric. Sci. 2018, 10, 287–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Daneshpazhoh, P.; Ghasemi, A.R.; Nori Emamzadeie, M.R.; Barzegar, R. The effect of partial root-zone drying and zeolite on water use efficiency and physiological characteristics of sweet pepper. Water and Soil 2018, 32, 675–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Giné-Bordonaba, J.; Terry, L.A. Effect of deficit irrigation and methyl jasmonate application on the composition of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) fruit and leaves. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 199, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mirás-Avalos, J.M.; Intrigliolo, D.S. Grape composition under abiotic constrains: Water stress and salinity. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Giné-Bordonaba, J.; Terry, L.A. Manipulating the taste-related composition of strawberry fruits (Fragaria × ananassa) from different cultivars using deficit irrigation. Food Chem. 2010, 122, 1020–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Barzegar, Z.; Ghasemnezhad, M.; Olfati, J.; Khaledian, M.R.; Khalighi, A. The influence of silica upon quantitative, qualitative, and biochemical traits of tomato under water stress. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus. 2022, 21, 123–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, T.; Wu, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Yun, Z.; Duan, X.; Jiang, Y. L-Cysteine hydrochloride delays senescence of harvested longan fruit in relation to modification of redox status. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2018, 143, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Abdelhamid, M.T.; Sadak, M.S.; Schmidhalter, U.R.S.; El-Saady, A.K.M. Interactive effects of salinity stress and nicotinamide on physiological and biochemical parameters of faba bean plant. Acta biol. Colomb. 2013, 18, 499–509. [Google Scholar]
  57. Shalaby, O.A.E.S.; Konopiński, M.; Ramadan, M.E.S. Effect of chelated iron and silicon on the yield and quality of tomato plants grown under semi-arid conditions. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus. 2017, 16, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Fatemi, H.; Esmaiel Pour, B.; Rizwan, M. Foliar application of silicon nanoparticles affected the growth, vitamin C, flavonoid, and antioxidant enzyme activities of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) plants grown in lead (Pb)-spiked soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 1417–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zahedi, S.M.; Moharrami, F.; Sarikhani, S.; Padervand, M. Selenium and silica nanostructure-based recovery of strawberry plants subjected to drought stress. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mimmo, T.; Tiziani, R.; Valentinuzzi, F.; Lucini, L.; Nicoletto, C.; Sambo, P.; Scampicchio, M.; Pii, Y.; Cesco, S. Selenium biofortification in Fragaria × ananassa: Implications on strawberry fruits quality, content of bioactive health beneficial compounds and metabolomic profile. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zahedi, S.M.; Karimi, M.; Teixeira da Silva, J.A. The use of nanotechnology to increase quality and yield of fruit crops. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pakzad, R.; Fatehi, F.; Kalantar, M.; Maleki, M. Evaluating the antioxidant enzymes activities, lipid peroxidation and proteomic profile changing in UCB-1 pistachio rootstock leaf under drought stress. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 256, 108617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Khoyerdi, F.F.; Shamshiri, M.H.; Estaji, A. Changes in some physiological and osmotic parameters of several pistachio genotypes under drought stress. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 198, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tang, J.; Camberato, J.J.; Yu, X.; Luo, N.; Bian, S.; Jiang, Y. Growth response, carbohydrate and ion accumulation of diverse perennial ryegrass accessions to increasing salinity. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 154, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, Y.; Wei, X. Dark septate endophyte improves the drought-stress resistance of Ormosia hosiei seedlings by altering leaf morphology and photosynthetic characteristics. Plant Ecol. 2021, 222, 761–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, X.; Wu, G.; Li, D.; Song, X. Moderate Nitrogen Deposition Alleviates Drought Stress of Bretschneidera sinensis. Forests 2023, 14, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, P.; Song, A.; Li, Z.; Fan, F.; Liang, Y. Silicon ameliorates manganese toxicity by regulating manganese transport and antioxidant reactions in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Soil. 2012, 354, 407–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Amin, M.; Ahmad, R.; Ali, A.; Hussain, I.; Mahmood, R.; Aslam, M.; Lee, D.J. Influence of silicon fertilization on maize performance under limited water supply. Silicon 2018, 10, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Manivannan, A.; Ahn, Y.K. Silicon regulates potential genes involved in major physiological processes in plants to combat stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. El-Sayed, S.F.; Hassan, H.A.; Ali, A.M.; Gibrael, A.A. Effect of foliar-applied potassium silicate on growth, yield, fruit quality and antioxidant activity of tomato plants grown under deficit irrigation. Int. J. Health Sci. 2022, 6 (Suppl. 6), 10012–10032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Nazaralian, S.; Majd, A.; Irian, S.; Najafi, F.; Ghahremaninejad, F.; Landberg, T.; Greger, M. Comparison of silicon nanoparticles and silicate treatments in fenugreek. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 115, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Conti, V.; Mareri, L.; Faleri, C.; Nepi, M.; Romi, M.; Cai, G.; Cantini, C. Drought stress affects the response of italian local tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) varieties in a genotype-dependent manner. Plants 2019, 8, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Tamasi, G.; Pardini, A.; Bonechi, C.; Donati, A.; Pessina, F.; Marcolongo, P.; Gamberucci, A.; Leone, G.; Consumi, M.; Magnani, A.; et al. Characterization of nutraceutical components in tomato pulp, skin and locular gel. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2019, 245, 907–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Cao, Y.; Luo, Q.; Tian, Y.; Meng, F. Physiological and proteomic analyses of the drought stress response in Amygdalus mira (Koehne) Yü et Lu roots. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Lu, G.; Jian, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Cao, J. Suppressive effect of silicon nutrient on Phomopsis stem blight development in asparagus. Hortic. Sci. 2008, 43, 811–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bokor, B.; Vaculík, M.; Slováková, Ľ.; Masarovič, D.; Lux, A. Silicon does not always mitigate zinc toxicity in maize. Acta Physiol. Plant 2014, 36, 733–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Rady, M.M.; Belal, H.E.; Gadallah, F.M.; Semida, W.M. Selenium application in two methods promotes drought tolerance in Solanum lycopersicum plant by inducing the antioxidant defense system. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 266, 109290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ming, D.F.; Pei, Z.F.; Naeem, M.S.; Gong, H.J.; Zhou, W.J. Silicon alleviates PEG-induced water-deficit stress in upland rice seedlings by enhancing osmotic adjustment. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2012, 198, 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zeng, F.R.; Zhao, F.S.; Qiu, B.Y.; Ouyang, Y.N.; Wu, F.B.; Zhang, G.P. Alleviation of chromium toxicity by silicon addition in rice plants. Agr. Sci. China. 2011, 10, 1188–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pei, Z.F.; Ming, D.F.; Liu, D.; Wan, G.L.; Geng, X.X.; Gong, H.J.; Zhou, W.J. Silicon improves the tolerance to water-deficit stress induced by polyethylene glycol in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2010, 29, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cao, B.L.; Ma, Q.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, L.; Xu, K. Effects of silicon on absorbed light allocation, antioxidant enzymes and ultrastructure of chloroplasts in tomato leaves under simulated drought stress. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 194, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gohari, G.; Molaei, S.; Kheiry, A.; Ghafouri, M.; Razavi, F.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Juárez-Maldonado, A. Exogenous application of proline and L-cysteine alleviates internal browning and maintains eating quality of cold stored flat ‘maleki’peach fruits. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ali, S.; Khan, A.S.; Malik, A.U.; Nawaz, A.; Shahid, M. Postharvest application of antibrowning chemicals modulates oxidative stress and delays pericarp browning of controlled atmosphere stored litchi fruit. J. Food Biochem. 2019, 43, 12746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Sogvar, O.B.; Razavi, F.; Rabiei, V.; Gohari, G. Postharvest application of L-cysteine to prevent enzymatic browning of “Stanley” plum fruit during cold storage. J. Food Process. 2020, 44, 14788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Özcan, M.M.; Erel, Ö.; Herken, E.E. Antioxidant activity, phenolic content, and peroxide value of essential oil and extracts of some medicinal and aromatic plants used as condiments and herbal teas in Turkey. J. Med. Food. 2009, 12, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Amaral, J.S.; Valentão, P.; Andrade, P.B.; Martins, R.C.; Seabra, R.M. Do cultivar, geographical location and crop season influence phenolic profile of walnut leaves? Molecules 2008, 13, 1321–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Shohael, A.M.; Ali, M.B.; Yu, K.W.; Hahn, E.J.; Paek, K.Y. Effect of temperature on secondary metabolites production and antioxidant enzyme activities in Eleutherococcus senticosus somatic embryos. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2006, 85, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Khani, A.; Barzegar, T.; Nikbakht, J.; Ghahremani, Z. Effect of foliar spray of calcium lactate on the growth, yield and biochemical attribute of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) under water deficit stress. Adv. Hortic. Sci. 2020, 34, 11–24. [Google Scholar]
  89. Weidner, S.; Karolak, M.; Karamac, M.; Kosinska, A.; Amarowicz, R. Phenolic compounds and properties of antioxidants in grapevine roots [Vitis vinifera L.] under drought stress followed by recovery. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2009, 78, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ahmad, P.; Ahanger, M.A.; Alam, P.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Wijaya, L.; Ali, S.; Ashraf, M. Silicon (Si) supplementation alleviates NaCl toxicity in mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] through the modifications of physio-biochemical attributes and key antioxidant enzymes. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 38, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sharma, A.; Shahzad, B.; Rehman, A.; Bhardwaj, R.; Landi, M.; Zheng, B. Response of phenylpropanoid pathway and the role of polyphenols in plants under abiotic stress. Molecules 2019, 24, 2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Akula, R.; Ravishankar, G.A. Influence of abiotic stress signals on secondary metabolites in plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2011, 6, 1720–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wahed, S.H.A.; Y Al-Eidani, T.; Jasim, A.H. Effect of antioxidant reagents and silicon spraying on phenol, flavonoid and anthocyanin in oat varieties. Indian J. Ecol. 2019, 46, 175–179. [Google Scholar]
  94. Gong, H.; Chen, K. The regulatory role of silicon on water relations, photosynthetic gas exchange, and carboxylation activities of wheat leaves in field drought conditions. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2012, 34, 1589–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Asgari, F.; Majd, A.; Jonoubi, P.; Najafi, F. Effects of silicon nanoparticles on molecular, chemical, structural and ultrastructural characteristics of oat (Avena sativa L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 127, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Çelik, Ö.; Ayan, A.; Atak, Ç. Enzymatic and non-enzymatic comparison of two different industrial tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) varieties against drought stress. Bot. Stud. 2017, 58, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Mamnabi, S.; Nasrollahzadeh, S.; Ghassemi-Golezani, K.; Raei, Y. Improving yield-related physiological characteristics of spring rapeseed by integrated fertilizer management under water deficit conditions. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 797–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Nahar, K.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Rahman, A.; Alam, M.M.; Mahmud, J.A.; Suzuki, T.; Fujita, M. Polyamines confer salt tolerance in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) by reducing sodium uptake, improving nutrient homeostasis, antioxidant defense, and methylglyoxal detoxification systems. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Raziq, A.; Wang, Y.; Mohi Ud Din, A.; Sun, J.; Shu, S.; Guo, S. A comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance in tomato (Var. ailsa craig): Responses of physiological and transcriptional changes in RBOH’s and ABA biosynthesis and signalling genes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ahanger, M.A.; Qin, C.; Maodong, Q.; Dong, X.X.; Ahmad, P.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Zhang, L. Spermine application alleviates salinity induced growth and photosynthetic inhibition in Solanum lycopersicum by modulating osmolyte and secondary metabolite accumulation and differentially regulating antioxidant metabolism. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 144, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Maghsoudi, K.; Emam, Y.; Pessarakli, M. Effect of silicon on photosynthetic gas exchange, photosynthetic pigments, cell membrane stability and relative water content of different wheat cultivars under drought stress conditions. J. Plant Nutr. 2016, 39, 1001–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Dehghanipoodeh, S.; Ghobadi, C.; Baninasab, B.; Gheysari, M.; Shiranibidabadi, S. Effect of silicon on growth and development of strawberry under water deficit conditions. Hort Plant. J. 2018, 4, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ashraf, M.; Afzal, M.; Ahmad, R.; Maqsood, M.A.; Shahzad, S.M.; Aziz, A.; Akhtar, N. Silicon management for mitigating abiotic stress effects in plants. Plant Stress 2010, 4, 104–114. [Google Scholar]
  104. Kim, Y.H.; Khan, A.L.; Waqas, M.; Lee, I.J. Silicon regulates antioxidant activities of crop plants under abiotic-induced oxidative stress: A review. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Jiménez-Arias, D.; García-Machado, F.J.; Morales-Sierra, S.; Luis, J.C.; Suarez, E.; Hernández, M.; Valdés, F.; Borges, A.A. Lettuce plants treated with L-pyroglutamic acid increase yield under water deficit stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 158, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Barzegar, T.; Moradi, P.; Nikbakht, J.; Ghahremani, Z. Physiological response of Okra cv. Kano to foliar application of putrescine and humic acid under water deficit stress. Int. J. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 2016, 3, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ahanger, M.A.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Wijaya, L.; Alamri, S.A.; Alam, P.; Ashraf, M.; Ahmad, P. Potential of exogenously sourced kinetin in protecting Solanum lycopersicum from NaCl-induced oxidative stress through up-regulation of the antioxidant system, ascorbate-glutathione cycle and glyoxalase system. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, 0202175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Avestan, S.; Ghasemnezhad, M.; Esfahani, M.; Byrt, C.S. Application of nano-silicon dioxide improves salt stress tolerance in strawberry plants. J. Agron. 2019, 9, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. AlKahtani, M.D.; Hafez, Y.M.; Attia, K.; Rashwan, E.; Husnain, L.A.; AlGwaiz, H.I.; Abdelaal, K.A. Evaluation of silicon and proline application on the oxidative machinery in drought-stressed sugar beet. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Robatjazi, R.; Roshandel, P.; Hooshmand, S.D. Benefits of silicon nutrition on growth, physiological and phytochemical attributes of basil upon salinity stress. Int. J. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 2020, 7, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Pang, Z.; Tayyab, M.; Islam, W.; Tarin, M.W.K.; Sarfaraz, R.; Naveed, H.; Zaman, S.; Zhang, B.; Yuan, Z.; Zhang, H. Silicon mediated improvement in tolerance of economically important crops under drought stress. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2019, 17, 6151–6170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Asgharipour, M.R.; Mosapour, H. A foliar application silicon enhances drought tolerance in fennel. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2016, 26, 1056–1062. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Potassium silicate (KSi) and L-cysteine (Cys) foliar application impact on fruit yield of Cape gooseberries (Physalis peruviana L.) under deficit irrigation in 2022 (A) and 2023 (B). Values shown are means ± standard errors (n = 3). Gray bars are means of 3 replications on individual plants (n = 3), while vertical lines correspond to ±values and indicate standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Potassium silicate (KSi) and L-cysteine (Cys) foliar application impact on fruit yield of Cape gooseberries (Physalis peruviana L.) under deficit irrigation in 2022 (A) and 2023 (B). Values shown are means ± standard errors (n = 3). Gray bars are means of 3 replications on individual plants (n = 3), while vertical lines correspond to ±values and indicate standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05).
Agronomy 15 00675 g001
Figure 2. Potassium silicate (KSi) and L-cysteine (Cys) foliar application impact on TSS (A,B) and TA (C,D) contents of Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) fruits under deficit irrigation in 2022 and 2023. Gray bars are means of 3 replications on individual plants (n = 3), while vertical lines correspond to ±values and indicate standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Potassium silicate (KSi) and L-cysteine (Cys) foliar application impact on TSS (A,B) and TA (C,D) contents of Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) fruits under deficit irrigation in 2022 and 2023. Gray bars are means of 3 replications on individual plants (n = 3), while vertical lines correspond to ±values and indicate standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05).
Agronomy 15 00675 g002
Figure 3. Potassium silicate (KSi) and L-cysteine (Cys) foliar application impact on ascorbic acid content (A,B) of Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) fruits under deficit irrigation in 2022 and 2023. Gray bars are means of 3 replications on individual plants (n = 3), while vertical lines correspond to ±values and indicate standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Potassium silicate (KSi) and L-cysteine (Cys) foliar application impact on ascorbic acid content (A,B) of Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) fruits under deficit irrigation in 2022 and 2023. Gray bars are means of 3 replications on individual plants (n = 3), while vertical lines correspond to ±values and indicate standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05).
Agronomy 15 00675 g003
Figure 4. Potassium silicate (KSi) and L-cysteine (Cys) foliar application impact on total soluble carbohydrate (A,B) and total soluble protein (C,D) contents in Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) fruits under deficit irrigation in 2022 and 2023, respectively. Gray bars are means of 3 replications on individual plants (n = 3), while vertical lines correspond to ±values and indicate standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Potassium silicate (KSi) and L-cysteine (Cys) foliar application impact on total soluble carbohydrate (A,B) and total soluble protein (C,D) contents in Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) fruits under deficit irrigation in 2022 and 2023, respectively. Gray bars are means of 3 replications on individual plants (n = 3), while vertical lines correspond to ±values and indicate standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05).
Agronomy 15 00675 g004
Figure 5. Potassium silicate (KSi) and L-cysteine (Cys) foliar application impact on CAT (A,B), POX (C,D) and SOD (E,F) activities in Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) fruits under deficit irrigation in 2022 and 2023. Gray bars are means of 3 replications on individual plants (n = 3), while vertical lines correspond to ±values and indicate standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Potassium silicate (KSi) and L-cysteine (Cys) foliar application impact on CAT (A,B), POX (C,D) and SOD (E,F) activities in Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) fruits under deficit irrigation in 2022 and 2023. Gray bars are means of 3 replications on individual plants (n = 3), while vertical lines correspond to ±values and indicate standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05).
Agronomy 15 00675 g005
Figure 6. Potassium silicate (KSi) and L-cysteine (Cys) foliar application impact on APX (A,B), PPO (C,D), and PAL (E,F) activities in Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) fruits under deficit irrigation in 2022 and 2023. Gray bars are means of 3 replications on individual plants (n = 3), while vertical lines correspond to ±values and indicate standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Potassium silicate (KSi) and L-cysteine (Cys) foliar application impact on APX (A,B), PPO (C,D), and PAL (E,F) activities in Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) fruits under deficit irrigation in 2022 and 2023. Gray bars are means of 3 replications on individual plants (n = 3), while vertical lines correspond to ±values and indicate standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05).
Agronomy 15 00675 g006
Figure 7. Potassium silicate (KSi) and L-cysteine (Cys) foliar application impact on the total phenol (A,B) and flavonoid (C,D) contents and antioxidant activity (E,F) of Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) fruits under deficit irrigation in 2022 and 2023. Gray bars are means of 3 replications on individual plants (n = 3), while vertical lines correspond to ±values and indicate standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05).
Figure 7. Potassium silicate (KSi) and L-cysteine (Cys) foliar application impact on the total phenol (A,B) and flavonoid (C,D) contents and antioxidant activity (E,F) of Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) fruits under deficit irrigation in 2022 and 2023. Gray bars are means of 3 replications on individual plants (n = 3), while vertical lines correspond to ±values and indicate standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05).
Agronomy 15 00675 g007
Figure 8. Potassium silicate (KSi) and L-cysteine (Cys) foliar application impact on MSI (A,B), MDA (C,D), and H2O2 (E,F) accumulation in Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) fruits under deficit irrigation in 2022 and 2023. Gray bars are means of 3 replications on individual plants (n = 3), while vertical lines correspond to ±values and indicate standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05).
Figure 8. Potassium silicate (KSi) and L-cysteine (Cys) foliar application impact on MSI (A,B), MDA (C,D), and H2O2 (E,F) accumulation in Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) fruits under deficit irrigation in 2022 and 2023. Gray bars are means of 3 replications on individual plants (n = 3), while vertical lines correspond to ±values and indicate standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05).
Agronomy 15 00675 g008
Figure 9. Potassium silicate (KSi) and L-cysteine (Cys) foliar application impact on proline (A,B) content in Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) fruits under deficit irrigation in 2022 and 2023. Gray bars are means of 3 replications on individual plants (n = 3), while vertical lines correspond to ±values and indicate standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05).
Figure 9. Potassium silicate (KSi) and L-cysteine (Cys) foliar application impact on proline (A,B) content in Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) fruits under deficit irrigation in 2022 and 2023. Gray bars are means of 3 replications on individual plants (n = 3), while vertical lines correspond to ±values and indicate standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05).
Agronomy 15 00675 g009
Table 1. Soil physical and chemical properties on the site of the experimental field.
Table 1. Soil physical and chemical properties on the site of the experimental field.
Soil TextureOrganic Matter (%)pHEC (dS m−1)N (%)Ca (g kg−1)Na (g kg−1)K (g kg−1)
Loam clay0.947.41.490.070.120.130.20
Table 2. Average daily data of meteorological parameters at the synoptic weather station at the University of Zanjan, Iran, during the growing season (2022 and 2023).
Table 2. Average daily data of meteorological parameters at the synoptic weather station at the University of Zanjan, Iran, during the growing season (2022 and 2023).
Meteorological ParameterMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
202220232022202320222023202220232022202320222023
Maximum temperature (°C)30.229.233.733.134.934.832.231.827.723.815.619.0
Minimum temperature (°C)12.212.015.614.916.515.112.212.39.08.62.95.2
Average temperature (°C)21.220.624.724.025.725.022.222.118.416.29.312.1
Average relative humidity (%)31.444.130.23434.728.828.936.336.242.665.249.1
Total rainfall (mm)0.140.20.08.20.02.20.00.90.54.221.12.3
Sum sunshine (hr)10.59.711.912.311.310.810.38.39.46.66.16.7
Table 3. Correlation between qualitative and biochemical traits of Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) fruits treated with silicate potassium (KSi) and L-cysteine (Cys) under deficit irrigation in 2022 and 2023.
Table 3. Correlation between qualitative and biochemical traits of Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) fruits treated with silicate potassium (KSi) and L-cysteine (Cys) under deficit irrigation in 2022 and 2023.
AttributesTSSTAVit CTSCTSPCATPOXSODAPXPPOPALPhenolFlavonoidAAMSIMDAH2O2ProlineYield
TSS1
TA0.027 ns1
Vit C−0.088 ns0.007 ns1
TSC0.181 ns0.283 **−0.181 ns1
TSP0.493 **0.114 ns−0.035 ns−0.077 ns1
CAT−0.070 ns0.294 **−0.038 ns0.734 **−0.307 **1
POX0.420 **0.161 ns−0.267 **0.480 **0.160 ns0.274 **1
SOD0.198 *0.108 ns−0.069n s0.599 **−0.310 **0.671 **0.398 **1
APX0.364 **0.440 **0.036 ns0.416 **0.298 **0.255 **0.438 **0.354 **1
PPO0.179 ns0.244 *−0.257 **0.547 **−0.259 **0.526 **0.395 **0.656 **0.455 **1
PAL−0.104 ns0.201 *−0.135 ns0.678 **−0.559 **0.850 **0.366 **0.746 **0.163 ns0.567 **1
Phenol−0.030 ns0.434 **−0.031 ns0.614 **−0.321 **0.724 **0.362 **0.594 **0.251 **0.439 **0.797 **1
Flavonoid−0.107 ns0.221 *−0.084 ns0.573 **−0.517 **0.773 **0.291 **0.670 **0.092 ns0.500 **0.870 **0.770 **1
AA0.139 ns0.291 **−0.335 **0.721 **−0.157 ns0.735 **0.653 **0.616 **0.274 **0.533 **0.774 **0.726 **0.682 **1
MSI−0.064 ns−0.001 ns0.313 **0.241 *−0.373 **0.435 **−0.088 ns0.252 **−0.021 ns0.183 ns0.448 **0.422 **0.424 **0.152 ns1
MDA−0.219 *−0.033 ns−0.514 **0.223 *−0.290 **0.164 ns0.264 **0.192 *−0.138 ns0.240 *0.361 **0.176 ns0.245 *0.476 **−0.183 ns1
H2O2−0.197 *0.054 ns−0.431 **−0.254 **0.092 ns−0.298 **−0.187 ns−0.276 **−0.264 **−0.142 ns−0.298 **−0.341 **−0.267 **−0.089 ns−0.509 **0.396 **1
Proline0.480 **0.364 **−0.096 ns0.528 **0.339 **0.338 **0.551 **0.471 **0.567 **0.360 **0.240 *0.366 **0.130 ns0.398 **−0.103 ns−0.049 ns−0.265 **1
Yield0.075 ns−0.168 ns0.392 **−0.417 **0.157 ns−0.395 **−0.252 **−0.217 *−0.045 ns−0.420 **−0.395 **−0.267 **−0.342 **−0.566 **0.093 ns−0.542 **−0.324 **0.063 ns1
ns, *, **: non-significant and significant at p < 0.05 or p < 0.01, respectively.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khani, A.; Barzegar, T.; Nikbakht, J.; Sabatino, L. Foliar Application of K-Silicate and L-Cysteine Enhances Production, Quality, and Antioxidant Activities of Cape Gooseberry Fruits Under Drought Conditions. Agronomy 2025, 15, 675. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15030675

AMA Style

Khani A, Barzegar T, Nikbakht J, Sabatino L. Foliar Application of K-Silicate and L-Cysteine Enhances Production, Quality, and Antioxidant Activities of Cape Gooseberry Fruits Under Drought Conditions. Agronomy. 2025; 15(3):675. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15030675

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khani, Arezoo, Taher Barzegar, Jaefar Nikbakht, and Leo Sabatino. 2025. "Foliar Application of K-Silicate and L-Cysteine Enhances Production, Quality, and Antioxidant Activities of Cape Gooseberry Fruits Under Drought Conditions" Agronomy 15, no. 3: 675. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15030675

APA Style

Khani, A., Barzegar, T., Nikbakht, J., & Sabatino, L. (2025). Foliar Application of K-Silicate and L-Cysteine Enhances Production, Quality, and Antioxidant Activities of Cape Gooseberry Fruits Under Drought Conditions. Agronomy, 15(3), 675. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15030675

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop