Next Article in Journal
Runoff Mitigation in Croplands: Evaluating the Benefits of Straw Mulching and Polyacrylamide Techniques
Previous Article in Journal
Effects on Soil Chemical Properties and Carbon Stock Two Years after Compost Application in a Hedgerow Olive Grove
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrating Agrivoltaic Systems into Local Industries: A Case Study and Economic Analysis of Rural Japan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Agrivoltaic: Challenge and Progress

Department of Optics and Optical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2023, 13(7), 1934; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071934
Submission received: 12 July 2023 / Accepted: 18 July 2023 / Published: 22 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Agrivoltaic: Challenge and Progress)
According to the International Energy Agency (IEA) [1], deploying renewable energy technologies is crucial for achieving the net-zero emissions target by 2050. Moreover, using renewable energy is essential in order to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions and attain the target of limiting global warming to 2 to 4 degrees by 2100 [2]. Among these technologies, solar energy is the most promising renewable energy source. In recent years, photovoltaic (PV) technology has developed rapidly, continuously improving PV efficiency. The electricity generation efficiency of commercial PV modules has increased from about 15% in 2010 to about 23% today [3]. In addition, the production cost of PV modules has significantly decreased, with the price per watt dropping from 5 CNY/watt in 2012 to 1.8 CNY/watt in 2022 [4]. However, two significant bottlenecks hinder the large-scale deployment of PV solar energy in an attempt to replace traditional energy: energy storage and the availability of land for installing PV panels. Although countries such as China and the United States have vast, sparsely populated areas with abundant solar resources, there are technical difficulties and increased costs in transmitting PV electricity to densely populated and industrially developed areas through ultra-high voltage transmission systems. Therefore, using agricultural land for PV installation in densely populated areas is becoming increasingly common. In 2021, the global installed capacity of agricultural PV (APV) reached approximately 14 GWp [5]. APV can help to avoid drought stress and maintain higher soil moisture, thus improving plant growth [6].
Compared to rooftop PV, building PV power plants on farmland has certain advantages, such as the following: a single project can cover a larger area, and the unit cost of electricity generation is lower. In China, ground-mounted PV power plants’ per watt cost has been reduced to as low as 4.13 CNY/watt [4] in 2022. The biggest challenge faced by APV is ensuring sufficient crop yield under the PV panels. Theoretically, the shaded area underneath the PV panels receives only 20% of the solar energy during a clear day [7]. This level of solar radiation energy is usually insufficient for most crops, resulting in significant reductions in yield.
However, many people believe that implementing APV may be the wrong course of action; in fact, the solar radiation intensity between 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. during spring, summer, and autumn is excessively strong and may even harm crop growth in many Northern Hemisphere regions. Photosynthesis increases with increasing light intensity, but when light intensity reaches a certain maximum, light saturation is reached, and photosynthetic efficiency ceases to increase, and it can even decrease even if light intensity rises again. The effect of strong light on photoinhibition is obvious, with the strongest sunlight at midday and a significant decrease in photosynthetic rate in the corresponding C3 plants, such as soybean and rice [8].
It is worth noting that while sunlight is crucial for robust plant growth, too much sunlight can have the opposite effect. Therefore, using APV may help minimize the damaging effects of excessive solar radiation on crops. By reducing the amount of direct sunlight that reaches plants during the hottest part of the day, farmers can create a more favorable growing environment, which may increase their crop yield. While APV may not be a panacea for all agricultural challenges, it is a viable choice for farmers facing high solar radiation levels and seeking to increase their yield. In essence, the core of APV is to manage light while considering the unique conditions of crops, enabling farmers to create a more sustainable and productive cultivation environment and then use excess solar energy for PV electricity generation.
There are already two early solutions to address the problem of insufficient light under PV panels. The first involves using mosaic-structured PV panels that allow some light to pass through [9]. APV using this design has already demonstrated successful crop cultivation, as evidenced by the high yield and quality of different fruits in German PV orchards [5]. However, this approach may not be fit for widespread implementation due to the relatively high cost of these panels, which could double the price of PV electricity generation per watt (assuming a transmittance rate of 50%). The second solution utilizes thin-film solar cell technology, particularly semi-transparent thin-film solar cells such as amorphous silicon and cadmium telluride. PV integration in greenhouses has been extensively studied and documented in the scientific literature. Some publications partly describe using solar panels to cover greenhouse roofs [10,11].
The crop cultivation performance of APV-utilizing cells such as amorphous silicon and cadmium telluride is suboptimal because the light transmission spectrum of thin-film solar cells is not aligned with the range required for crop photosynthesis. Therefore, they have not been widely adopted.
A research team at the University of Science and Technology of China recently proposed two innovative solutions to the challenge of realizing crop photosynthesis and PV power generation on the same farmland. The first solution is Spectrum Splitting and Concentrated APV (SCAPV) [12], which uses spectral splitting to selectively transmit red, blue, and far-red light from sunlight to plants for photosynthesis. The remaining sunlight is concentrated and directly generates electricity for the PV panels. The critical aspect of this solution is to design a cost-effective multi-passband filter that separates sunlight [13,14]. SCAPV represents one of the two main strategies for mitigating the shading problem in APV [15]. The second solution is Even-lighting APV (EAPV) [16,17], which aims to improve the structural design of APV by placing grooved glass plates between two PV panels. These plates allow sunlight to be transmitted and distributed evenly, providing even lighting and sufficient light intensity for plant photosynthesis. The conventional method involves the sunlight hitting the top of the PV panels between the grooved glass plates to generate electricity. These two solutions demonstrate the promise of APV and could revolutionize the way we use solar energy, the application of which could help improve plant and crop growth, quality, and yield [17,18]. Moreover, these two solutions significantly reduced water evaporation [19]. By combining the strengths of solar energy and agriculture, we can create a sustainable and efficient system that meets the growing demand for renewable energy and food production.
Our Special Issue focuses on integrating agriculture and PV, covering light and water management, growing in low-light environments, and maximizing economic benefit from land use. Five papers are presented in this Special Issue. These papers explore the potential benefits of APV in addressing various challenges in agriculture, including food security, economic growth, and energy sustainability. In addition, diverse applications of APV are demonstrated, such as using APV to improve crop yield and quality, reduce water consumption, and minimize land use conflicts.
The first paper, authored by Nakata H and Ogata S [20], discusses the benefits of an APV installation model that is compatible with the regional population and attempts to gain social acceptance by considering the area’s unique characteristics. A case study and economic analysis were conducted in rural Japan to demonstrate the potential of APV in improving land use efficiency and stimulating the local economy. The study suggests that APV could generate 215% of the annual electricity demand in the area (equivalent to 17.8 GWh) and produce 108.9% (EUR 47.8 million) of economic ripple effects in the region. These quantifiable and applicable results indicate the enormous potential of APV in addressing food-related issues, as well as economic and energy issues, in rural areas.
The second paper, written by Wagner M et al. [21], found that installing overhead APV on agricultural land has positive ecological outcomes; the study also demonstrated that, under certain conditions, APV can promote the expansion of renewable energy production resources without reducing food production resources.
The third paper, authored by Chae S et al. [22], presents a study analyzing the yield, antioxidant capacity, and secondary metabolites of broccoli in three cultivation periods. This study identified the potential benefits of APV in broccoli cultivation. The results showed that APV could produce green broccoli that is preferable to consumers while maintaining yield and antioxidant capacity.
The fourth paper, written by Ali Abaker Omer A et al. [23], includes experimental research on sunlight’s ability to partially reduce water evaporation. The study found that, under polymer multilayers, water evaporation could be significantly reduced, and the polymer multilayers could reflect and concentrate most of the sunlight that is not needed for crop cultivation for PV electricity generation. This research provides a promising solution for reducing agricultural water evaporation using low-cost polymer multilayers.
Lastly, the fifth paper, provided by Tao Z et al. [24], presents a study discussing how cultivation and farming techniques can improve crop heat tolerance by regulating ABA. These techniques include adjusting sowing time; applying plant growth regulators and fertilizers; and using irrigation, deep tillage, and heat acclimation.
These five papers highlight the potential benefits of APV in improving land use efficiency, reducing environmental impacts, generating renewable energy, and improving crop quality and yield. They also address critical issues in agriculture, such as water scarcity, climate change, and food and energy security. These papers provide valuable insights into the practical and economic feasibility of APV in promoting sustainable agriculture as well as other technologies. They also indicate the need for further research and development to address the challenges of implementing these solutions and make their implementation easier for farmers. These papers contribute to the ongoing efforts to transform agricultural PV into a more sustainable and resilient technology that meets the growing demands for food and energy while developing green energy, protecting the environment, and supporting local communities.

Funding

The research work received financial support from various sources, including “the Plan for Anhui Major Provincial Science & Technology Project” (Grant No. 202203a06020002), “Science & Technology Program of Hebei” (Grant No. 22327215D), “Fuyang Municipal Government—Fuyang Normal University Horizontal Project” (Grant No. SXHZ202011), and “the CRSRI Open Research Program” (Grant CKWV2019726/KY).

Data Availability Statement

No new data was created.

Acknowledgments

The Editors thank the authors for contributing to this Special Issue. We also thank the reviewers and editorial managers for their valuable assistance. Their efforts were integral to the success of this publication, which aims to advance the field of sustainable agriculture and renewable energy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Agency, I.E. Net Zero by 2050. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050 (accessed on 1 July 2023).
  2. Kramarz, T.; Park, S.; Johnson, C. Governing the Dark Side of Renewable Energy: A Typology of Global Displacements. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 74, 101902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Commons, W. File: Best Research-Cell Efficiencies.png. Available online: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Best_Research-Cell_Efficiencies.png (accessed on 1 July 2023).
  4. CCID and CPIA. 2022~2023 China PV Industry Development Roadmap. Available online: http://www.chinapv.org.cn/ (accessed on 1 July 2023).
  5. Trommsdorff, M.; Dhal, I.S.; Özdemir, Ö.E.; Ketzer, D.; Weinberger, N.; Rösch, C. Chapter 5—Agrivoltaics: Solar Power Generation and Food Production. In Solar Energy Advancements in Agriculture and Food Production Systems; Gorjian, S., Campana, P.E., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 159–210. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hassanpour Adeh, E.; Selker, J.S.; Higgins, C.W. Remarkable Agrivoltaic Influence on Soil Moisture, Micrometeorology and Water-Use Efficiency. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0203256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Liu, T.; Yang, X.G.; Gao, J.Q.; He, B.; Bai, F.; Zhang, F.; Liu, Z.; Wang, X.; Sun, S.; Wan, N. Radiation Use Efficiency of Different Grain Crops in Northeast China. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2020, 36, 186–193. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, J.L.; Qi, H.; Fang, Q.H.; Yu, G. Diurnal Changes of Photosynthesis and Its Hysteresis to Light in Rice (Oryza sativa L.), Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) and Maize (Zea mays L.). Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin. 2007, 22, 119–124. [Google Scholar]
  9. Obergfell, T.; Schnidele, S.; Bopp, G.; Goetzberger, A.; Reise, C. Agrophotovoltaic–Agricultural Production Below Optimized Elevated Photovoltaic Systems. In Proceedings of the 13th IAEE European Conference on Energy Economics of Phasing out Carbon and Uranium, Düsseldorf, Germany, 18–21 August 2013; International Association for Energy Economics: Cleveland, CO, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cossu, M.; Murgia, L.; Ledda, L.; Deligios, P.A.; Sirigu, A.; Chessa, F.; Pazzona, A. Solar Radiation Distribution inside a Greenhouse with South-Oriented Photovoltaic Roofs and Effects on Crop Productivity. Appl. Energy 2014, 133, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yano, A.; Kadowaki, M.; Furue, A.; Tamaki, N.; Tanaka, T.; Hiraki, E.; Kato, Y.; Ishizu, F.; Noda, S. Shading and Electrical Features of a Photovoltaic Array Mounted inside the Roof of anEast–West Oriented Greenhouse. Biosyst. Eng. 2010, 106, 367–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, W.; Liu, L.; Guan, C.; Zhang, F.; Li, M.; Lv, H.; Yao, P.; Ingenhoff, J. A Novel Agricultural Photovoltaic System Based on Solar Spectrum Separation. Sol. Energy 2018, 162, 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Omer, A.A.A.; Zhao, S.; Liu, W. Design of Multi-Passband Polymer Multilayer Film and Its Application in Photovoltaic Agriculture. Chin. Opt. Lett. 2021, 19, 112201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, M.; Liu, W.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, X.; Abaker Omer, A.A.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, S. Polymer Multilayer Film with Excellent UV-Resistance & High Transmittance and Its Application for Glass-Free Photovoltaic Modules. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2021, 229, 111103. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gorjian, S.; Jamshidian, F.J.; Gorjian, A.; Faridi, H.; Vafaei, M.; Zhang, F.; Liu, W.; Campana, P.E. Technological Advancements and Research Prospects of Innovative Concentrating Agrivoltaics. Appl. Energy 2023, 337, 120799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zheng, J.; Zhang, X.; Ning, X.; Ingenhoff, J.; Liu, W. An Improved Photovoltaic Agriculture System with Groove Glass Plate. In Proceedings of the Optical Design and Testing IX, Hangzhou, China, 20–23 October 2019; Volume 111851D. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zheng, J.; Meng, S.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, H.; Ning, X.; Chen, F.; Omer, A.A.A.; Ingenhoff, J.; Liu, W. Increasing the Comprehensive Economic Benefits of Farmland with Even-Lighting Agrivoltaic Systems. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0254482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Omer, A.A.A.; Li, M.; Liu, X.; Liu, W.; Liu, Y.; Mukhtar, Y.M.F.; Ingenhoff, J.; Liu, W. The Effect of the Novel Agricultural Photovoltaic System on Water Evaporation Reduction and Sweet Potato Yield BT. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Petroleum and Petrochemical Technology Conference, Beijing, China, 21–23 March 2022; Lin, J., Ed.; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2023; pp. 567–578. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ali Abaker Omer, A.; Liu, W.; Li, M.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, X.; Osman Hamid Mohammed, S.; Fan, L.; Liu, Z.; Chen, F.; et al. Water Evaporation Reduction by the Agrivoltaic Systems Development. Sol. Energy 2022, 247, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nakata, H.; Ogata, S. Integrating Agrivoltaic Systems into Local Industries: A Case Study and Economic Analysis of Rural Japan. Agronomy 2023, 13, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wagner, M.; Lask, J.; Kiesel, A.; Lewandowski, I.; Weselek, A.; Högy, P.; Trommsdorff, M.; Schnaiker, M.-A.; Bauerle, A. Agrivoltaics: The Environmental Impacts of Combining Food Crop Cultivation and Solar Energy Generation. Agronomy 2023, 13, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chae, S.-H.; Kim, H.J.; Moon, H.-W.; Kim, Y.H.; Ku, K.-M. Agrivoltaic Systems Enhance Farmers’ Profits through Broccoli Visual Quality and Electricity Production without Dramatic Changes in Yield, Antioxidant Capacity, and Glucosinolates. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ali Abaker Omer, A.; Li, M.; Liu, W.; Liu, X.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, X.; Osman Hamid Mohammed, S.; Liu, Y.; Ingenhoff, J.; et al. Water Evaporation Reduction Using Sunlight Splitting Technology. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tao, Z.; Yan, P.; Zhang, X.; Wang, D.; Wang, Y.; Ma, X.; Yang, Y.; Liu, X.; Chang, X.; Sui, P.; et al. Physiological Mechanism of Abscisic Acid-Induced Heat-Tolerance Responses to Cultivation Techniques in Wheat and Maize—Review. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, W.; Omer, A.A.A.; Li, M. Agrivoltaic: Challenge and Progress. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1934. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071934

AMA Style

Liu W, Omer AAA, Li M. Agrivoltaic: Challenge and Progress. Agronomy. 2023; 13(7):1934. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071934

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Wen, Altyeb Ali Abaker Omer, and Ming Li. 2023. "Agrivoltaic: Challenge and Progress" Agronomy 13, no. 7: 1934. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071934

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop