Next Article in Journal
Comparative Study of Traditional and Environmentally Friendly Zinc Sources Applied in Alkaline Fluvisol Soil: Lettuce Biofortification and Soil Zinc Status
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Marasmius tricolor 310b on the Degradation of Cellulose in Rapeseed Straw Composting
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Defoliation Time on Rye Yield and Its Quality under Dual-Purpose Cultivation for Roughage and Concentrate Production

1
Department of Agro-Environmental Science, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro 080-8555, Japan
2
School of Agriculture and Animal Science, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro 080-8555, Japan
3
Department of Sustainable Agriculture, Rakuno Gakuen University, Ebetsu 069-8501, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2023, 13(12), 3013; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13123013
Submission received: 12 November 2023 / Revised: 27 November 2023 / Accepted: 5 December 2023 / Published: 8 December 2023

Abstract

:
A dual-purpose cultivation system allows cereals to produce both roughage and concentrate during one growing season. To establish a cultivation system for rye, the appropriate time for foliage mowing was determined to ensure a yield of nutrient-rich roughage from the first crop and abundant grain from the second crop. This is because the stage of growth at defoliation affects the yield and quality of both crops. The experimental rye line ‘4R-504’ was grown in two successive cropping seasons; 2019/2020 and 2020/2021. Foliage was mowed at three different growth stages: the booting stage (BT), the early-heading stage (EH), and the fully heading stage (FH). Along with the growth stage, the plants grew taller, and the highest dry matter yield in the first crop was observed in FH (757 g m−2), which was 1.5 times higher than that in BT (480 g m−2). Although the nutritional value was higher in plants harvested at an earlier growth stage, the EH and FH plants showed a higher dry matter yield, resulting in a higher production of metabolizable energy per area. Plants that had been mowed earlier regrew vigorously and produced an abundant amount of grains in the second crop. BT showed the highest grain yield of 239 g m−2, which corresponds to 60% of the yield from the unmowed control. FH produced grains of only 76 g m−2, which barely met the requirement of the dual-purpose cropping system. To enhance the nutritional yield of roughage, it is recommended to harvest the first crop at the early heading stage. Conversely, to achieve a higher grain yield, defoliation should be carried out during the booting stage.

1. Introduction

The self-sufficiency rate for livestock feed in Japan, which includes both roughage and concentrate, is relatively low, at only 25% [1]. To reduce import dependence in livestock farming, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan has prioritized increasing fodder production [2,3]. In particular, there has been a growing need for intensive fodder production from paddies and common fields because the total area of artificial meadowland in the country has gradually decreased due to farmers retiring and abandoning cultivation [4].
In the northern region of Japan, farmers often cultivate fodder corn and cereals such as oat and barley for animal feed [5,6]. The foliage of these crops can be used as nutritious roughage, while their matured grains can provide valuable concentrate as a source of starch. In these crops, the translocation of nutrients stored in the vegetative parts to the grains occurs after the flowers have developed. Therefore, if the plants are harvested when they are fully mature, their nutritional value will deteriorate, rendering them useless as roughage [7,8]. Harvesting at an earlier stage can produce nutritious roughage; however, it will not result in any grain production, of course. This indicates that fodder corn and common cereals can only produce either roughage or concentrate during a single cropping, demonstrating a limited flexibility in production.
Rye (Secale cereale L.) is a tall-statured cereal primarily grown as a food crop in cool temperate regions. With its abundant biomass, the green foliage of rye is occasionally utilized as roughage, particularly in the production of silage [9]. Mature grains are also available as a concentrate that is rich in starch and minerals [10,11]. In addition, rye is also unique in its growth. If the foliage is mowed before the flowering stage, the stubble will regenerate and produce a second crop, which will eventually yield grain [12,13,14]. This practice can be utilized in implementing a dual-purpose cropping system, where the first crop is used for roughage and the subsequent second crop is used for concentrate (grains) [15].
Regarding the dual-purpose cropping system of cereals that has been practiced thus far, the main challenge has been determining when to defoliate the first crop [16,17,18]. Foliage removal at an earlier growth stage encourages rapid regrowth, resulting in a good grain yield in the second crop, while producing a small amount of roughage. Delaying the removal of forage achieves a high yield of roughage, but negatively affects the regrowth ability. In the case of rye, in order to obtain both high-nutrient foliage and a productive second crop, the tillering stage is considered to be the optimal time for defoliation [13,14,15]. Meanwhile previous attempts at the dual-purpose cropping system of rye were exclusively based on the assumption that the first crop would be utilized for grazing [14,19]. This implies that defoliation would be carried out during the vegetative growth stage when the plants are still small in size. In northern Japan, however, it is difficult to graze livestock on paddies or common crop fields due to the geographical distance between livestock farming areas and field cropping. As a result, the primary use of fodder cereals, such as rye, is for mowing. Therefore, the first crop harvest will inevitably take place after the initiation of the reproductive growth stage, when the plants have grown significantly large. It is considered that defoliation during the vegetative growth stage and reproductive growth stage exerts a different impact on subsequent growth and grain production of the aftermath. This study aimed to investigate the optimal timing for foliage mowing to maximize the yield of high-nutrient roughage from the first crop and abundant grain from the second crop. The goal is to establish a dual-purpose cropping system for rye.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cultivation of Rye

The field experiments were conducted at the experimental field of Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido prefecture, Japan (42.9° N, 143.2° E, and 77.8 m above sea level), for two consecutive cropping seasons: 2019/2020 and 2020/2021. The soil type of the field was andosol with a pH range of 6.2–6.4, containing approximately 4 mg of available nitrogen, 40mg of available phosphate and 60 mg of exchangeable potassium per 100 g of soil. The climate at the field is characterized by an average annual temperature of 7.2 °C and an annual precipitation of 920 mm [20]. From late December to late March, the field was covered with approximately 50 cm of snow.
The unregistered experimental winter rye line ‘4R-504’ was used for the experiments. This line is suitable for fodder use due to its superior biomass productivity and abundance of tall tillers. Seed sowing took place on 28 September 2019 and 30 September 2020, respectively. The seeds were sown at a density of 100 seeds per square meter, with a planting interval of 4 cm and a row spacing of 25 cm. Planting density was determined based on the results of preliminary tests, which showed that the dense planting of more than 120 plants per square meter led to expected lodging in our region. Prior to basal fertilization, 100 g m−2 of calcium carbonate was applied for soil amendment. The soil was then fertilized with 40 g m−2 of nitrogen (N), 15 g m−2 of phosphorous pentoxide (P2O5), and 10 g m−2 of potassium oxide (K2O), which is the standard application rate for common wheat in the Obihiro region.
To determine how the growth stage at defoliation, and harvest of the first crop, affect the yield and quality of both the first and second crops, the foliage was mowed at three different growth stages: booting stage, early-heading stage, and fully heading stage. Definitions of each growth stage in this study were as follows. Booting stage: the panicle in the sheath rises to just below the flag leaf but is not visible (Zadoks’ growth stage 45). Early-heading stage: approximately 30% of the plants developed initial panicles (Zadoks’ growth stage 53). Full-heading stage: all the plants have panicles but do not initiate anthesis (Zadoks’ growth stage 60) [21]. Plants mowed at the booting stage, early-heading stage, and fully heading stage were conveniently expressed as BT, EH, and FH, respectively. All the leaves and culms were mowed by hand using a sickle at a height of 15 cm above the soil level. After mowing, top-dressing of N was applied at a rate of 40 g m−2 to promote regrowth. Plants grown conventionally for grain and left unmowed during their growth were used as the control. Grains were harvested from all plants at their mature stage. Threshed seeds were dried in a ventilating oven at 45 °C until they reached a water content of approximately 13%. The fields were designed by arranging the control, BT, EH, and FH in a randomized block design with 8 replicates for each year. Each plot was formed by five ridges of 6 m long (1 m × 6 m).

2.2. Measurements

Culm length, number of tillers, and dry matter (DM) yield were recorded for the first crop. Culm length was determined by measuring the distance from the soil level to the base of the flag leaf (BT) or the panicle base (EH and FH) of the tallest tiller on two randomly selected plants per plot. Harvested plant bodies were dried in the ventilating oven at 70 °C for 3 days and ground to a powder with an average particle size of 1 mm using a cyclone mill (CT293 CyclotexTM, FOSS, Hillleroed, Denmark) for nutritional analyses. Nutritional values such as ash content, organic cellular contents (OCC; non-structural sugars, proteins, starches, fat, etc., in cytoplasm), organic cell wall (OCW), organic a-fraction in OCW (Oa; cell wall digestible with cellulase), and organic b-fraction in OCW (Ob; cell wall indigestible with cellulase) were analyzed using the amylase/actinase/cellulase enzymatic method [22,23]. Total digestible nutrition (TDN) was estimated using the following equation developed by Abe et al. [24]:
TDN (%) = 1.111 (OCC + Oa) + 0.605 Ob − 18
Metabolizable energy (ME) was estimated using the following equation [25]:
ME (Mcal kg−1 DM) = −1.849 + 0.0557 OCC + 0.0558 Oa + 0.0330 Ob
Then, the production of ME per unit area (MEP) was predicted by multiplying the ME and DM yield.
At the time of the final harvest, the culm length and number of tillers were recorded again in each plot. The regrowth rate was calculated for the dual-cropped plots using the following equation:
R e g r o w t h   r a t e ( % ) = N o . t i l l e r s   a t   t h e   s e c o n d   c r o p N o . o f   t i l l e r s   a t   t h e   f i r s t   c r o p × 100
Threshed and dried seeds were screened using a sieve with a mesh size of 2.2 mm. Then, the seeds that remained on the sieve were used to measure grain yield, 1000 grain weight, and protein content. Protein content was estimated using a near-infrared transmittance grain analyzer (InfratecTM 1241, FOSS, Hillleroed, Denmark).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

To ensure a normal distribution and equal variance, an arcsine transformation was applied to the nutrient data of the first crops [26]. All data were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with years and harvest time of the first crop as the main variable factors. In the absence of interaction or random block effects, the variances were combined with the total error variance, and the effects of the main factors were retested. When significant effects of the main factors were detected, the Bonferroni post hoc comparison test was performed to compare the means between plants or years at the 5% level. The statistical software package SPSS ver. 22TM (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for analyses.

3. Results

3.1. Weather Condition of Two Experimental Periods

The climate record, taken by a data logger (ATOMOS41/ZL6TM, METER Group, Pullman, WA, USA) set at the experimental field, indicated that the daily average temperature, effective accumulative temperature, and cumulative precipitation during the sowing period until to the beginning of continuous snow cover (30 September to 15 December) were 5.8 °C, 241.2 °C, and 195.5 mm in 2018, and 5.2 °C, 222.3 °C, and 207.5 mm in 2019, respectively. In both years, the weather conditions before snowfall were similar, and the plants developed a comparable number of leaves and tillers in the first week of December. During the snow melting period until the final harvest began (1 April to 15 August), the daily average temperature and effective accumulative temperature did not differ significantly between the two years (15.1 °C and 1454.3 °C in 2019; 14.9 °C and 1422.3 °C in 2020). However, in 2020, there was a period of hot weather, with temperatures above 25 °C, that lasted for several consecutive days at the end of July. This caused the second crop to burn up prematurely. The period from late June to mid-July in 2020, when the second crops were in the panicle emergence stage, was characterized by low precipitation, approximately half of the normal amount for that time of year.

3.2. Growth and Yield of the First Crop

Harvest day, culm length, number of tillers, and DM yield in the first crop are shown in Table 1. In both years, the first crops were harvested sequentially from late May at five- or six-day intervals. Along with the growth stage, the plants grew taller, and the average culm length over two years was longer in the following order: FH (111.8 cm), EH (100.9 cm), and BT (80.7 cm). Many of the vegetative tillers in rye senesced and disappeared after the booting stage. The number of tillers tended to decrease as the growth stage progressed, although the differences between plants in both years were not statistically significant. The first crop that was harvested in the later growth stage had a higher DM yield. The highest DM yield (757 g m−2) was observed in FH, which was 1.5 times higher than that in BT (480 g m−2). The number of tillers and DM yield were higher in 2018/2019 than in 2019/2020. The earlier spring thaw in 2019 may be one reason for these results.

3.3. Nutritional Values of the First Crop

Nutritional values of the first crops obtained through enzymatic analysis are presented in Table 2. In both years, OCC, the aggregation of soluble organic matter in the cell was higher in plants harvested at earlier stages. The average OCC over two years in BT was 36.4%, which is more than 10 percentage points higher than that in FH (23.5%). On the contrary, the total OCW (Oa + Ob) increased during the growth stage. Among the components of OCW, the proportion of the indigestible fraction, Ob, changed as it grew and increased in the following order: BT (37.4%), EH (47.9%), and FH (56.7%). A higher TDN was recorded in plants harvested at earlier stages, with the highest value being 63.1% in BT. On the other hand, EH (1.51 Mcal m−2) and FH (1.50 Mcal m−2), which showed the higher dry matter production, achieved a higher MEP.

3.4. Growth of the Second Crop and Grain Yield

In both years, the control was harvested on 28 July. Approximately two weeks later, the plants in the dual-cropped plots reached maturity and were harvested together on 12 August 2019 and 11 August 2020, respectively. The culm length, number of tillers, and regrowth rate are shown in Table 3. All plants in the dual-cropped plots were smaller than those in the control at the mature stage. The average culm length of the second crop ranged from 119.4 cm (FH) to 132.1 cm (BT) over 2 years, which was significantly shorter than that of the control (157.9 cm). The number of tillers in the second crop ranged from 313 m−2 (FH) to 459 m−2 (BT), which was also lower than that in the control (821 m−2). Good regrowth was observed in plants that were defoliated at earlier stages. BT exhibited the highest regrowth rate, averaging 57.2% over two years, and produced a second crop with more tillers compared to EH and FH.
The grain yield was significantly lower in the second crops than in the control (411 g m−2, Table 4). Among the second crops, BT showed the highest grain yield of 239 g m−2 over two years, which corresponded to 60% of the control. On the other hand, FH produced grains of only 76 g m−2 on the regenerated plants, which was less than 20% of the control. On average, the 1000 grain weight in the second crops ranged from 27.2 g (FH) to 32.4 g (BT) over two years, which was also lower than the control (49.5 g; Table 4). The protein content of the grains was the lowest in the control (122.4 mg g−1) and BT (123.0 mg g−1). Among the second crops, the protein content was higher in plants where the first crop had been mowed at a later stage.

4. Discussion

The dual-purpose cropping system enables the production of both roughage and concentrate during a single growing season. From an economic standpoint, farmers could potentially earn two sources of income by cultivating a single crop species. Double-cropping system is another promising strategy for producing both roughage and concentrate within a year [27,28,29]. This system involves growing two different crops consecutively on the same field, such as winter cereal and maize or sorghum. A double-cropping system can achieve higher biomass yields compared to the single cropping of respective crops and also establish diversification of the feed produced. However, farmers would have to invest additional time and labor for plowing and seeding twice a year [27]. A dual-purpose cropping system, where roughage and concentrate can be obtained from a single plant, is considered to be more efficient in terms of labor savings [30].
Many of the gramineous plants, including forage grasses and cereals, undergo vertical growth after panicle formation and reach their maximum height during the flowering stage [31,32,33]. Therefore, foliage mass will increase during the flowering stage [34,35]. In the case of timothy, a major temperate forage grass in the Hokkaido area, the dry matter weight of the aboveground body increases by as much as 1.5 times from the booting stage to the full-heading or flowering stage [36,37,38]. Rye also grew taller and produced more foliage as it continued to grow. In the results of this study, the crop growth rate during the booting stage to full-heading stage was calculated to be a high value of 25.1 g m−2 day−1, averaged over two years. The dry matter (DM) yield of the first crop increased by approximately 1.4 times during the 6-day period from the booting stage to the early-heading stage. It then increased by about 1.1 times during the 5-day period from the early-heading stage to the full-heading stage. In terms of yield, the full-heading stage was determined to be the appropriate time to harvest the first crop among the growth stages defined in this study.
The productivity of forage crops must be measured not only by weight but also by the amount of nutrients produced [39,40]. Common forage grasses tend to decline in nutritional value and rumen digestibility as the panicles emerge from the sheath. This is because nutrient components, such as soluble carbohydrates and proteins, are transferred to the reproductive organs, which become stiff and indigestible [34,38,41]. Festulolium, a temperate perennial forage, exhibited a decrease in the quantity of organic cell content or cellulase digestible fiber in the foliage after panicle emergence. Instead, it rapidly increased the amount of non-digestible fiber. Aa a result, the total digestible nutrients (TDN) at the full-heading stage were approximately 5 percentage points lower compared to the booting stage [42]. Similarly, as the rye grew, the nutritive components (OCC and Oa) decreased sharply, while the non-nutritive component (Ob) increased. As a result, TDN was approximately 9 percentage points lower in FH compared to BT. The translocation of nutrient components to reproductive organs was enhanced during panicle emergence [38,43], and this physiological process was more prominent in annual cereals, such as rye, than in perennial grasses [35,44,45]. Delaying harvesting until the heading stage resulted in a greater yield of herbage, but it also decreased the nutritional quality as roughage. Nevertheless, EH and FH produced a higher metabolic energy per unit area compared to BT. The decline in nutritional value observed in the first crop was compensated for by the increase in yield. In terms of nutrient production, the early-heading stage or the full-heading stage was determined to be the appropriate time to harvest the first crop, as defined in this study.
After the onset of reproductive growth, grass plants generally show improved regrowth when their foliage is harvested at an earlier stage. During this stage, a substantial amount of the nutrients are retained in the stubble and roots [46,47,48], while the relationship between the time of defoliation and the vigor of regrowth is obscure in winter cereals during the tillering stage [14,49,50]. In this study, defoliation was applied during the reproductive growth stage, and the plants that were mowed earlier exhibited vigorous regrowth. As evidenced by the changes in the nutrient values of the first crops, BT preserved a larger proportion of the nutrients in the vegetative organs compared to EH and FH. This led to an ample supply of resources for vigorous regrowth. However, regardless of the timing of defoliation, the size of the second crop was significantly smaller than that of the control.
Previous studies on dual-purpose cropping systems of cereals, which assumed that the foliage was used for grazing at the tillering stage, reported that the body mass and grain productivity of the second crop were comparable to those of the non-grazed control [14,51,52]. In this study, however, even though BT showed the better regrowth ability compared to the other dual-cropped plants, it yielded significantly less grain than the control. The impact of defoliation may be more significant if plants experience defoliation during the reproductive stage compared to the vegetative growth stage. As for FH, the grain yield was too low to meet the objective of the dual-purpose cropping system, which aims to produce grain in the second crop. In order to practice the dual-purpose cropping of rye, the first crop must be harvested at least until the early-heading stage. Compared to the control and BT, EH had a higher protein content in the grains. Given the smaller grain size of EH, the lower translocation of carbohydrates into the grain can be attributed to the higher protein content expressed as w/w, rather than an increase in protein production [14,53]. Further investigation is needed to determine the quality of EH’s grain as a starch resource concentrate. Based on the quantity and quality of the grains of the second crop, the appropriate time for harvesting the first crop, as defined in this study was considered to be the booting stage.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrated the feasibility of the dual-purpose cropping of rye, even when the foliage was mowed during the reproductive growth stage. However, a five-day delay in defoliation resulted in a significant difference in the yield and quality of the first crop, as well as in the regrowth and grain production of the second crop. In order to establish a dual-purpose cultivation system that utilizes foliage for mowing, it is necessary to harvest the first crop before it reaches the full heading stage. If farmers prioritize roughage production, the most preferable period for harvesting the first crop, among the growth stages examined in this study, would be the early-heading stage in terms of the higher TDN and MEP yields. On the other hand, if the priority is given to concentrate production (grain), it is preferable to harvest the first crop at the booting stage when higher regrowth ability and grain yield can be expected.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, M.A. and T.Y.; formal analysis, M.A.; investigation and data curation, M.A. and H.O.; writing—original draft preparation and editing, M.A. and T.Y.; funding acquisition, M.A. and T.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by JSPS KAKENHI, grant number JP18K05588 and JP22K05966.

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the finding of this study are included in the text.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Hirotsugu Hijikata and Takahiro Terado in National Livestock Breeding Center for helping in field experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. FAO. FAOSTAT Supply Utilization Accounts. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/SCL (accessed on 4 October 2023).
  2. Urakawa, S. Distribution system for production of self-supplied feed. Grass. Sci. 2015, 60, 254–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tsubaki, S. Examination on the issues dependent on imported feed in Japan’s livestock industry and efforts to improve the feed self-sufficiency rate. Memo. Fac. Agr. Ehime Univ. 2022, 67, 42–51. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishers, Japan. The 96th Statistical Yearbook of Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishers. Available online: https://www.maff.go.jp/e/data/stat/96th/index.html#6 (accessed on 4 October 2023).
  5. Saito, A.; Yoshihira, T.; Kosaka, S. Studies on the optimum harvest time on the basis of fermentative quality and feed quality in spring oats and barley as high moisture grain silage in comparison with whole crop silage. J. Hokkaido Soci. Grass. Sci. 2009, 43, 50. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tokachi Comprehensive Promotion Bureau. Forage crops. In Agriculture in Tokachi; Tokachi Comprehensive Promotion Bureau, Ed.; Tokachi Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives: Obihiro, Japan, 2022; p. 24. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gebbing, T.; Schnyder, H.; Kühbauch, W. The utilization of pre-anthesis reserves in grain filling of wheat. Assessment by steady-state 1313CO2/12CO2 labelling. Plant Cell Environ. 1999, 22, 851–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Przulj, N.; Momčilović, V. Dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and use in spring barley. Plant Soil Environ. 2003, 49, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Newell, M.A.; Butler, T.J. Forage rye improvement in the southern united states: A review. Crop Sci. 2013, 53, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Smit, M.N.; Zhou, X.; Landero, J.L.; Young, M.G.; Beltranena, E. Increasing hybrid rye level substituting wheat grain with or without enzyme on growth performance and carcass traits of growing-finishing barrows and gilts. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2019, 3, 1561–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rajtar, P.; Sady, M.; Górka, P.; Kehoe, S.; Micek, P. Effect of Replacing Maize Grain by Hybrid Rye Grain in the TMR on Performance of Mid-Lactating Dairy Cows. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2022, 22, 237–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dann, P.R. The grain yield of winter-grazed crops. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 1977, 17, 452–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fontaneli, R.S.; dos Santos, H.P.; do Nascimento, A.; Minella, E.; Caierao, E. Yield and nutritive value of dual purpose winter cereals: Green forage, silage or grain. Rev. Bras. Zootecn. 2009, 38, 2116–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ates, S.; Keles, G.; Demirci, U.; Dogan, S.; Ben Salem, H. Biomass yield and feeding value of rye, triticale, and wheat straw produced under a dual-purpose management system. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 95, 4893–4903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. McGrath, S.R.; Thomas, D.T.; Greer, A.W. Dual-purpose cropping: The opportunity for a step change in production in the temperate region of Australia. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2021, 61, i–iv. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fieser, B.G.; Horn, G.W.; Edwards, J.T.; Krenzer, E.G. Timing of Grazing Termination in Dual-Purpose Winter Wheat Enterprises1. Professional. Anim. Sci. 2006, 22, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Seymour, M.; England, J.H.; Malik, R.; Rogers, D.; Sutherland, A.; Randell, A. Effect of timing and height of defoliation on the grain yield of barley, wheat, oats and canola in Western Australia. Crop Pasture Sci. 2015, 66, 287–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zeleke, K.T. Effect of grazing time and intensity on growth and yield of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Integr. Agric. 2019, 18, 1138–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. del Duca, L.D.A.; Guarienti, E.M.; Fontaneli, R.S.; Zanotto, D.L. Cut effects simulating grazing on the chemical composition of grains of winter cereals. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 1999, 34, 1607–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Japan Meteorological Agency. Weather, Climate & Earthquake Information. Table of Monthly Climate Statistics. Available online: https://www.data.jma.go.jp/obd/stats/data/en/smp/index.html (accessed on 4 October 2023).
  21. Zadoks, J.C.; Chang, T.T.; Konzak, C.F. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 1974, 14, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abe, A. Application of enzymatic analysis of prediction of organic matter to the analysis of changes in nutritive values of forages. J. Jpn. Soc. Grassl. Sci. 1979, 25, 231–240. [Google Scholar]
  23. Abe, A.; Hori, S.; Kameoka, K. Application of Enzymatic analysis with glucoamylase, pronase and cellulase to various feeds for cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 1979, 48, 1483–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abe, A.; Shinoda, M.; Iwasaki, K.; Satoh, F.; Suda, T.; Takahashi, B. Assessment of total digestible nutrients (TDN) of hays from its chemical composition. Jpn. J. Zootech. Sci. 1985, 56, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Terada, F.; Serizawa, B.; Noda, R.; Iwasaki, K.; Abe, A. Prediction of metabolizable energy contents of the diets for cattle from chemical composition or digestible nutrients. Jpn. J. Zootech. Sci. 1988, 59, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sokal, R.R.; Rohlf, F.J. Nested analysis of variance. In Biometry the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 4th ed.; W. H. Freeman and Company: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 277–318. [Google Scholar]
  27. Goff, B.M.; Moore, K.J.; Fales, S.L.; Heaton, E.A. Double-cropping sorghum for biomass. Agron. J. 2010, 102, 1586–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lyons, S.E.; Ketterings, Q.M.; Godwin, G.S.; Cherney, J.H.; Cherney, D.J.; Meisinger, J.J.; Kilcer, T.F. Double-cropping with forage sorghum and forage triticale in New York. Agron. J. 2019, 111, 3374–3382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wannasek, L.; Ortner, M.; Kaul, H.P.; Amon, B.; Amon, T. Double-cropping systems based on rye, maize and sorghum: Impact of variety and harvesting time on biomass and biogas yield. Eur. J. Agron. 2019, 110, 125934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. McGrath, S.R.; Behrendt, R.; Friend, M.A.; Moore, A.D. Utilising dual-purpose crops effectively to increase profit and manage risk in meat production systems. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2021, 61, 1049–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jing, Q.; Bélanger, G.; Baron, V.; Bonesmo, H.; Virkajärvi, P.; Young, D. Regrowth simulation of the perennial grass timothy. Ecol. Model. 2012, 232, 64–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Collins, M. Hay preservation effects on yield and quality. In Post-Harvest Physiology and Preservation of Forages; Moor, K.J., Peterson, M.A., Eds.; American Society of Agronomy Inc.: Madison, WI, USA; Crop Science Society of America Inc.: Madison, WI, USA; Soil Science Society of America Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2015; pp. 67–89. [Google Scholar]
  33. Harrison, J.; Huhtanen, P.; Collins, M. Perennial grasses. In Silage Science and Technology; Buxton, D.R., Muck, R.E., Harrison, J.H., Eds.; American Society of Agronomy Inc.: Madison, WI, USA; Crop Science Society of America Inc.: Madison, WI, USA; Soil Science Society of America Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2015; pp. 665–747. [Google Scholar]
  34. Billman, E.D.; de Souza, I.A.; Smith, R.G.; Soder, K.J.; Warren, N.; Teixeira, F.A.; Brito, A.F. Winter annual forage mass–nutritive value trade-offs are affected by harvest timing. Crop Forage Turfgrass Manag. 2021, 7, e20113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Coblentz, W.K.; Ottman, M.J.; Kieke, B.A. Effects of harvest date and growth stage on triticale forages in the southwest United States: Agronomic characteristics, nutritive value, energy density, and in vitro disappearance of dry matter and fiber. J. Anim. Sci. 2022, 100, skac021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pelletier, S.; Tremblay, G.F.; Lafrenière, C.; Bertrand, A.; Bélanger, G.; Castonguay, Y.; Rowsell, J. Nonstructural carbohydrate concentrations in timothy as affected by N fertilization, stage of development, and time of cutting. Agron. J. 2009, 101, 1372–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nissinen, O.; Kalliainen, P.; Jauhiainen, L. Development of yield and nutritive value of timothy in primary growth and regrowth in northern growing conditions. Agric. Food Sci. 2010, 19, 252–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Østrem, L.; Volden, B.; Larsen, A. Morphology, dry matter yield and phenological characters at different maturity stages of ×Festulolium compared with other grass species. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 2013, 63, 531–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Beever, D.E.; Offer, N.; Gill, E.M. The feeding value of grass and grass products. In Grass, 3rd ed.; Hopkins, A., Ed.; Blackwell Science: London, UK, 2000; pp. 140–195. [Google Scholar]
  40. Buxton, D.R.; Mertens, D.R.; Fisher, D.S. Forage quality and ruminant utilization. In Cool-Season Forage Grasses; Moser, L.E., Buxton, D.R., Casler, M.D., Eds.; American Society of Agronomy Inc.: Madison, WI, USA; Crop Science Society of America Inc.: Madison, WI, USA; Soil Science Society of America Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2015; pp. 229–266. [Google Scholar]
  41. King, C.; Mc Eniry, J.; Richardson, M.; O’kiely, P. The chemical composition of a range of forage grasses grown under two nitrogen fertiliser inputs and harvested at different stages of maturity. In Breeding Strategies for Sustainable Forage and Turf Grass Improvement; Barth, S., Milbourne, D., Eds.; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 365–370. [Google Scholar]
  42. Touno, E.; Uozumi, S.; Deguchi, S.; Kaneko, M. Optimal cultivation system of festulolium (×Festulolium Braunii) (cv. Tohoku1gou) with TDN yield and persistency in Northeastern Japan. Jpn. J. Grassl. Sci. 2012, 58, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Da Silva, C.S.; Tucker, J.J.; Maia, F.J.; Lourenço, J.M.; Bass, M.L.; Seidel, D.S.; Callaway, T.R.; Hancock, D.W.; Stewart, R.L. The impact of maturity stages on yield, quality, and nutritive value of ensiled Johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers]. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2022, 6, txac118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Stirling, S.; Díaz, J.E.; Repetto, J.L.; Pla, M.; Arroyo, J.M.; Cajarville, C. Growth stage and ensiling: Impact on chemical composition, conservation quality and in situ ruminal degradability of whole-crop oat. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 2783–2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Liebert, J.; Cherney, J.H.; Ketterings, Q.M.; Mirsky, S.B.; Pelzer, C.J.; Ryan, M.R. Winter cereal species, cultivar, and harvest timing affect trade-offs between forage quality and yield. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2023, 7, 1067506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ross, S.M.; King, J.R.; O’Donovan, J.T.; Spaner, D. The productivity of oats and berseem clover intercrops. II. Effects of cutting date and density of oats on annual forage yield. Grass Forage Sci. 2005, 60, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tanaka, T.S.T.; Irbis, C.; Kumagai, H.; Inamura, T. Timing of harvest of Phragmites australis (CAV.) Trin. ex Steudel affects subsequent canopy structure and nutritive value of roughage in subtropical highland. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 166, 420–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Puka-Beals, J.; Sheaffer, C.C.; Jungers, J.M. Forage yield and profitability of grain-type intermediate wheatgrass under different harvest schedules. Agrosystems Geosci. Environ. 2022, 5, e20274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Royo, C. Plant recovery and grain-yield formation in barley and triticale following forage removal at two cutting stages. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 1999, 182, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Salama, H.S.A.; Safwat, A.M.; Elghalid, O.H.; Abd El-Hady, A.M. Agronomic and in vitro quality evaluation of dual-purpose cereals clipped at variable ages and their utilization in rabbit feeding. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bonachela, S.; Orgaz, F.; Fereres, E. Winter cereals grown for grain and for the dual-purpose of forage plus grain. Field Crop. Res. 1995, 44, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bell, L.W.; Kirkegaard, J.A.; Tian, L.; Morris, S.; Lawrence, J. Interactions of spring cereal genotypic attributes and recovery of grain yield after defoliation. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Spiertz, J.H.J.; Hamer, R.J.; Xu, H.; Primo-Martin, C.; Don, C.; van der Putten, P.E.L. Heat stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): Effects on grain growth and quality traits. Eur. J. Agron. 2006, 25, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Harvest date and means of culm length, number of tillers and dry matter (DM) yield in the first crop of the dual-purpose cropping rye.
Table 1. Harvest date and means of culm length, number of tillers and dry matter (DM) yield in the first crop of the dual-purpose cropping rye.
YearTreatmentHarvest DateCulm Length
(cm)
No. of Tillers
(m−2)
DM Yield
(g m−2)
2018/2019BT20 May82.7 c844518 c
EH26 May100.1 b817698 b
FH31 May108.5 a798754 a
2019/2020BT24 May78.5 n761442 n
EH30 May101.7 m751638 m
FH4 June115.1 l698759 l
Total2018/2019 97.2820 p656 p
2019/2020 98.4737 q613 q
BT 80.7 z802480 z
EH 100.9 y784668 y
FH 111.8 x748757 x
ANOVAYear ns****
Treatment **ns**
Interaction **nsns
Values followed by different letters within columns of same year or same treatment are significantly different at p = 0.05 according to Bonferroni post hoc comparison test. ns = not-significant; ** = significant at p = 0.01.
Table 2. Nutritional values and metabolizable energy production in the first crop of dual-purpose cropping rye.
Table 2. Nutritional values and metabolizable energy production in the first crop of dual-purpose cropping rye.
OCW (%) MEP
YearTreatmentAsh (%)OCC (%)OaObOa + ObTDN (%)(Mcal m−2)
BT9.0 a34.6 a16.1 a40.3 c56.5 c61.9 a1.19 b
2018/2019EH8.5 a29.9 a11.8 ab49.8 b61.6 b57.6 b1.52 a
FH7.7 b23.6 b11.1 b57.7 a68.8 a54.6 c1.48 a
BT9.6 l38.1 l17.8 l34.5 n52.3 c64.2 l1.28 m
2019/2020EH8.9 m28.9 m16.2 l46.0 m62.2 b59.2 m1.49 l
FH8.2 n23.4 n12.7 m55.7 l68.4 a55.0 n1.52 l
Total2018/20198.4 q29.313.0 q49.3 p62.358.11.43
2019/20208.9 p30.215.6 p45.4 q61.059.21.40
BT9.3 x36.4 x17.0 x37.4 z54.4 z63.1 x1.24 y
EH8.7 y29.4 y14.0 y47.9 y61.9 y58.4 y1.51 x
FH7.9 z23.5 z11.9 z56.7 x68.6 x54.8 z1.50 x
ANOVAYear**ns****nsnsns
Treatment**************
Interactionnsnsnsnsnsnsns
Values followed by different letters within columns of same year or same treatment are significantly different at p = 0.05 according to Bonferroni post hoc comparison test. ns = not-significant; ** = significant at p = 0.01. OCC = Organic cellular contents; OCW = Organic cell wall; Oa = Organic a-fraction in OCW; Ob = Organic b-fraction in OCW; TDN = Total digestible nutrition; MEP = Metabolizable energy production per unit area.
Table 3. Means of culm length and number of tillers at the final harvest, and regrowth rate in the second crop of dual-purpose cropping rye.
Table 3. Means of culm length and number of tillers at the final harvest, and regrowth rate in the second crop of dual-purpose cropping rye.
YearTreatmentCulm Length
(cm)
No. of Tillers
(m−2)
Regrowth Rate
(%)
Control143.1 a875 a-
2018/2019BT131.6 b485 b57.5 a
EH128.6 b430 c52.6 b
FH120.9 c339 d42.4 c
Control172.6 l766 l-
2019/2020BT132.6 m433 m57.5 l
EH120.7 n335 n44.6 m
FH117.2 n288 o41.3 n
Total2018/2019131.2 q532 p50.8 p
2019/2020135.7 p455 q47.6 q
Control157.9 w821 w-
BT132.1 x459 x57.2 x
EH124.7 y382 y48.6 y
FH119.4 z313 z41.8 z
ANOVAYear*****
Treatment******
Interaction*nsns
Values followed by different letters within columns of same year or same treatment are significantly different at p = 0.05 according to Bonferroni post hoc comparison test. ns = not-significant; * = significant at p = 0.05; ** = significant at p = 0.01.
Table 4. Means of grain yield, 1000 grain weight and protein content at the final harvest.
Table 4. Means of grain yield, 1000 grain weight and protein content at the final harvest.
YearTreatmentGrain Yield
(g m−2)
1000 Grain Weight (g)Protein Content
(mg g−1)
Control407 a48.1 a119.1 b
2018/2019BT283 b33.5 b118.8 b
EH141 c29.8 c123.4 a
FH78 d26.9 d125.3 a
Control416 l50.8 l125.7 n
2019/2020BT195 m31.4 m127.2 mn
EH124 n28.7 n130.0 m
FH74 o27.4 o141.7 l
Total2018/2019227 p34.6121.6 q
2019/2020202 q34.6131.2 p
Control411 w49.5 w1224 z
BT239 x32.4 x123.0 z
EH132 y29.2 y126.7 y
FH76 z27.2 z133.5 x
ANOVAYear*ns**
Treatment**ns**
Interactionns****
Values followed by different letters within columns of same year or same treatment are significantly different at p = 0.05 according to Bonferroni post hoc comparison test. ns = not-significant; * = significant at p = 0.05; ** = significant at p = 0.01.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Akimoto, M.; Okamoto, H.; Yoshihira, T. Effect of Defoliation Time on Rye Yield and Its Quality under Dual-Purpose Cultivation for Roughage and Concentrate Production. Agronomy 2023, 13, 3013. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13123013

AMA Style

Akimoto M, Okamoto H, Yoshihira T. Effect of Defoliation Time on Rye Yield and Its Quality under Dual-Purpose Cultivation for Roughage and Concentrate Production. Agronomy. 2023; 13(12):3013. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13123013

Chicago/Turabian Style

Akimoto, Masahiro, Honami Okamoto, and Taiki Yoshihira. 2023. "Effect of Defoliation Time on Rye Yield and Its Quality under Dual-Purpose Cultivation for Roughage and Concentrate Production" Agronomy 13, no. 12: 3013. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13123013

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop