Assessment of the Physiological Response and Productive Performance of Vegetable vs. Conventional Soybean Cultivars for Edamame Production
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Growing Conditions
2.2. Experimental Design
2.3. Gas Exchange
2.4. CO2 Assimilation Response Curve as a Function of PPFD
2.5. Productive and Structural Traits
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Daily Gas Exchanges
3.2. CO2 Assimilation Response Curve as a Function of PPFD
3.3. Productive and Structural Characteristics
3.4. Multivariate Analysis
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zeipiņa, S.; Alsiņa, I.; Lepse, L. Insight in edamame yield and quality parameters: A review. Res. Rural Dev. 2017, 2, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santana, A.C.; Carrão-Panizzi, M.C.; Mandarino, J.M.G.; Leite, R.S.; da Silva, J.B.; Ida, E.I. Evaluation of the shelf-life of vegetable-type soybean pods. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2012, 55, 591–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Battistini, C.; Gullón, B.; Ichimura, E.S.; Gomes, A.M.P.; Ribeiro, E.P.; Kunigk, L.; Moreira, J.U.V.; Jurkiewicz, C. Development and characterization of an innovative synbiotic fermented beverage based on vegetable soybean. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2017, 49, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Q.Y.; Gao, Q.I.; Hebert, S.J.; Li, Y.; Hashemi, A.M. Influence of sowing date on phenological stages, seed growth and marketable yield of four vegetable soybean cultivars in North-eastern USA. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2010, 5, 2556–2562. Available online: http://www.academicjournals.org/journal/AJAR/article-abstract/6E6678E34155 (accessed on 16 October 2020).
- Czaikoski, K.; Carrão-Panizzi, M.C.; da Silva, J.B.; Ida, E.I. Effects of storage time and temperature on the characteristics of vegetable-type soybean grain minimally processed. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2012, 55, 491–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Williams, M.M. Phenomorphological Characterization of Vegetable Soybean Germplasm Lines for Commercial Production. Crop Sci. 2015, 55, 1274–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, M.M.; Zhang, M.; Bhandari, B.; Guo, Z. A hybrid vacuum frying process assisted by ultrasound and microwave to enhance the kinetics of moisture loss and quality of fried edamame. Food Bioprod. Process. 2019, 118, 326–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, D.; Lord, N.; Polk, J.; Dhakal, K.; Li, S.; Yin, Y.; Duncan, S.E.; Wang, H.; Zhang, B.; Huang, H. Physical and chemical properties of edamame during bean development and application of spectroscopy-based machine learning methods to predict optimal harvest time. Food Chem. 2022, 368, 130799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrão-Panizzi, M.C. Edamame ou soja-hortaliça: Fácil de consumir e muito saudável vel. Informe Agropecuário 2006, 27, 59–64. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, V.; Rani, A.; Goyal, L.; Pratap, D.; Billore, S.D.; Chauhan, G.S. Evaluation of Vegetable-Type Soybean for Sucrose, Taste-Related Amino Acids, and Isoflavones Contents. Int. J. Food Prop. 2011, 14, 1142–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, J.; Wang, C.; Hong, X.; Hao, J.Z.; Xue, C.; Guo, N.; Gai, J.; Xing, H. Association analysis of vegetable soybean quality traits with SSR markers. Plant Breed. 2011, 130, 444–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ntatsi, G.; Gutiérres-Cortines, M.E.; Karapanos, I.; Barros, A.; Weiss, J.; Balliu, A.; dos Rosa, E.A.S.; Savvas, D. The quality of leguminous vegetables as influenced by preharvest factors. Scientia Hortic. 2018, 232, 191–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hendrawat, T.Y.; Audini, K.; Ismiyati; Ramadhan, A.I.; Gustia, H. Effects and characterization of different soybean varieties in yield and organoleptic properties of tofu. Results Eng. 2021, 11, 100238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castoldi, R.; de Charlo, H.C.O.; Vargas, P.F.; Braz, L.T.; Carrão-Panizzi, M.C.; de Mendonça, J.L. Influência do espaçamento entre plantas em características agronômicas de dois genótipos de soja-hortaliça de ciclo tardio em Jaboticabal-SP. Científica 2008, 37, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castoldi, R.; Charlo, H.C.O.; Vargas, P.F.; Braz, L.T.; Mendonça, J.L.; Carrão-Panizzi, M.C. Desempenho de quatro genótipos de soja-hortaliça em dois anos agrícolas. Hortic. Bras. 2009, 27, 256–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charlo, H.C.O.; Pessoa, R.; Funichello, M.; Castoldi, R.; Braz, L.T. Desempenho agronômico de dez linhagens de soja-hortaliça. Hortic. Bras. 2011, 29, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Penteado, S.R. Manual Prático de Agricultura Orgânica: Fundamentos e Técnicas, 2nd ed.; Via OrgânicaCampinas: São Paulo, Brazil, 2010; 232p. [Google Scholar]
- Smiderle, O.J.; Oliveira, J.M.F.; Schwengber, D.R. Desempenho de soja-hortaliça cultivada em área de cerrado em função de tipos de adubação. Rev. Agro@Mbiente Online 2009, 3, 86–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Espolador, F.G.; Souza, R.S.; Bornhofen, E.; Barbosa, P.A.M.; Nazato, F.M.; Yassue, R.M.; Vello, N.A. Soja Hortaliça. Piracicaba: ESALQ—Divisão de Biblioteca. 2017. Available online: https://www.esalq.usp.br/biblioteca/file/3678/download?token=Unn3l89r (accessed on 20 May 2021).
- Anghinoni, G.; Anghioni, F.B.G.; Tormenta, C.A.; Braccini, A.L.; de Mendes, I.C.; Zancanaro, L.; Rattan, L. Conservation agriculture strengthen sustainability of Brazilian grain production and food security. Land Use Policy 2021, 108, 105591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polli, G.M.; da Silveira, F.M.; Magnabosco, F.M.; dos Santos, G.H.S.; Stella, P.D.; Pinto, P.R.; Zibetti, M.R.; Apostolidis, T. Representations of food among vegetarians in Brazil: A psychosocial approach. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2021, 24, 100317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Da Cunha, A.R.; Martins, D. Classificação climática para os municípios de Botucatu e São Manuel, SP. Irriga 2009, 14, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raiji, B.V. Recomendações de Adubação e Calagem para o Estado de São Paulo, 2nd ed.; Boletim Técnico IAC: Campinas, Brazil, 1996; p. 285.
- Presidência da República. Lei nº 10.831, de 23 de Dezembro de 2003; Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Poder Executivo: Brasília, Brazil, 2003; p. 8.
- Presidência da República. Instrução Normativa nº 46, de 06 de Outubro de 2011; Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Poder Executivo: Brasília, Brazil, 2011.
- Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento—MAPA. Instrução Normativa n.17, de 18 de junho de 2014; Diário Oficial da União: Brasília, Brazil, 2014.
- RSTUDIO. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R; RSTUDIO: Boston, MA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Câmara, G.M.S.; Heiffig, L.S. Fisiologia, ambiente e rendimento da cultura da soja. In Soja: Tecnologia da Produção II; ESALQ/LPV: Piracicaba, Brazil, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Peng, X.; Thevathasan, N.V.; Gordon, A.M.; Mohammed, I.; Gao, P. Photosynthetic Response of Soybean to Microclimate in 26-Year-Old Tree-Based Intercropping Systems in Southern Ontario, Canada. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0129467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Raza, M.A.; Feng, L.Y.; Iqbal, N.; Ahmed, M.; Chen, Y.K.; Khalid, M.H.B.; Din, A.M.U.; Khan, A.; Ijaz, W.; Hussain, A.; et al. Growth and development of soybean under changing light environments in relay intercropping system. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Habermann, G.; Machado, E.C.; Rodrigues, J.D.; Medina, C.L. CO2 assimilation, photosynthetic light response curves, and water relations of ‘Pera’ sweet orange plants infected with Xylella fastidiosa. Braz J. Plant Physiol. 2003, 15, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amaro, A.C.E.; Macedo, A.C.; Ramos, A.R.P.; Goto, R.; Ono, E.O.; Rodrigues, J.D. The use of grafting to improve the net photosynthesis of cucumber. Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 2014, 26, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogles, C.Z.; Guertal, E.A.; Weaver, D.B. Edamame Cultivar Evaluation in Central Alabama. Agron. J. 2016, 108, 2371–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhaliwal, D.S.; Williams, M.M., II. Economically Optimal Plant Density for Machine-harvested Edamame. Hortscience 2020, 55, 368–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Monteiro, A.N.L.; Alves, J.M.A.A.; da Matos, W.S.; da Silva, M.R.S.; Silva, D.L.; Barreto, G.F.B. Densidade de plantas e doses de NPK nos componentes de produção de soja-hortaliça na Savana de Roraima. Rev. Agro@Mbiente Online 2015, 9, 352–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dos Santos, J.M.D.S.; Peixoto, C.P.; Rangel, M.A.S.; da Cruz, T.V.; da Silva, R.N.A.; Ledo, C.A.D.S. Desempenho agronômico de genótipos de soja hortaliça cultivados no recôncavo Baiano. Rev. Bras. Ciências Agrárias 2013, 8, 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- De Almeida, R.D.; Peluzio, J.M.; Afférri, F.S. Divergência genética entre cultivares de soja, sob condições de várzea irrigada, no sul do Estado Tocantins. Rev. Ciência Agron. 2011, 42, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guo, J.; Rahman, A.; Mulvaney, M.J.; Hossain, M.M.; Basso, K.; Fethiere, R.; Babar, M.A. Evaluation of edamame genotypes suitable for growing in florida. Agron. J. 2020, 112, 693–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cotrim, M.F.; Gava, R.; Campos, C.N.S.; David, C.H.O.; Reis, I.D.A.; Teodoro, L.P.R.; Teodoro, P.E. Desempenho fisiológico de genótipos de soja cultivados em regime de irrigação e sequeiro. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2021, 207, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Li, Y.; Chin, K.L.; Qi, Y. Vegetable soybean: Seed composition and production research. Ital. J. Agron. 2017, 12, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Crop Cycle | Maximum Average Temperature (°C) | Minimum Average Temperature (°C) | Accumulated Precipitation (mm) |
---|---|---|---|
(11/23/2020 to 12/23/2020) | 30.10 | 19.22 | 155.20 |
(12/24/2020 to 01/24/2021) | 28.85 | 19.51 | 320.54 |
(01/25/2021 to 02/25/2021) | 29.37 | 19.11 | 74.68 |
(02/26/2021 to 03/08/2021) | 26.94 | 19.12 | 75.19 |
Day Time | Air Temperature | Relative Humidity | PFFD |
---|---|---|---|
°C | % | μmol m−2 s−1 | |
8:00 a.m. | 24.4 | 56.3 | 600 |
10:00 a.m. | 27.5 | 58.3 | 1540 |
12:00 a.m. | 29.2 | 52.8 | 2150 |
2:00 p.m. | 31.4 | 47.5 | 1570 |
4:00 p.m. | 30.6 | 41.8 | 1350 |
6:00 p.m. | 26.1 | 49.7 | 220 |
Light Saturation Point | Light Compensation Point | Dark Respiration | |
---|---|---|---|
Cultivars | μmol m−2 s−1 | ||
BRSMG 790A | 1619 c | 36.1 c | −4.5 b |
BRS 267 | 2125 b | 46.4 b | −4.6 b |
58HO124 EP RR | 2430 a | 69.3 a | −6.5 a |
F | 75.3 * | 41.7 * | 85.2 * |
CV (%) | 11.4 | 8.6 | 4.1 |
Cultivars | FPIH | PH | NPP | PIGP | Mean and SD ** |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(cm) | (cm) | - | (g pl−1) | ||
BRS 267 | 14.6 a | 138.7 a | 139.0 b | 270.2 b | 249.5 ± 81.1 |
BRSMG 790A | 17.0 a | 123.0 b | 144.1 b | 547.6 a | 603.4 ± 388.7 |
58HO124 EP RR | 6.6 b | 79.3 c | 233.8 a | 339.1 b | 351.0 ± 174.9 |
F | 43.7 * | 182.3 * | 5.6 * | 9.2 * | - |
CV (5%) | 10.3 | 6.3 | 36.8 | 34.8 | - |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ribera, L.M.; Aires, E.S.; Neves, C.S.; Fernandes, G.d.C.; Bonfim, F.P.G.; Rockenbach, R.I.; Rodrigues, J.D.; Ono, E.O. Assessment of the Physiological Response and Productive Performance of Vegetable vs. Conventional Soybean Cultivars for Edamame Production. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1478. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12061478
Ribera LM, Aires ES, Neves CS, Fernandes GdC, Bonfim FPG, Rockenbach RI, Rodrigues JD, Ono EO. Assessment of the Physiological Response and Productive Performance of Vegetable vs. Conventional Soybean Cultivars for Edamame Production. Agronomy. 2022; 12(6):1478. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12061478
Chicago/Turabian StyleRibera, Laura Matos, Eduardo Santana Aires, Caio Scardini Neves, Gustavo do Carmo Fernandes, Filipe Pereira Giardini Bonfim, Roanita Iara Rockenbach, João Domingos Rodrigues, and Elizabeth Orika Ono. 2022. "Assessment of the Physiological Response and Productive Performance of Vegetable vs. Conventional Soybean Cultivars for Edamame Production" Agronomy 12, no. 6: 1478. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12061478
APA StyleRibera, L. M., Aires, E. S., Neves, C. S., Fernandes, G. d. C., Bonfim, F. P. G., Rockenbach, R. I., Rodrigues, J. D., & Ono, E. O. (2022). Assessment of the Physiological Response and Productive Performance of Vegetable vs. Conventional Soybean Cultivars for Edamame Production. Agronomy, 12(6), 1478. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12061478