Next Article in Journal
Yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir.) Displays Prezygotic and Postzygotic Barriers to Prevent Autogamy in Monoecious Cultivars
Next Article in Special Issue
Short-Term Responses of Soil Organic Carbon Pool and Crop Performance to Different Fertilizer Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata) to Improve Animal Performance in a Tall Fescue-Based Grazing System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Digestate and Manure Use in Kohlrabi Production: Impact on Plant-Available Nutrients and Heavy Metals in Soil, Yield, and Mineral Composition

1
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, 8 Trg Dositeja Obradovića, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
2
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Priština-Kosovska Mitrovica, Kopaonička bb, 38219 Lešak, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(4), 871; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040871
Submission received: 21 February 2022 / Revised: 25 March 2022 / Accepted: 26 March 2022 / Published: 1 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Organic Amendments in Agricultural Production)

Abstract

:
Digestate is a residue of the anaerobic decomposition of organic waste for biogas extraction, but it can be reused as a source of nutrients. To examine the effect of digestate in kohlrabi production, field experiments were conducted during three seasons in two calendar years. The fertilization treatments included the application of solid digestate (two rates—DS1 and DS2), liquid digestate (two rates—DL1 and DL2), solid manure (two rates—MS1 and MS2), and mineral fertilizer (NPK) and were compared with a plot without fertilization (Ø). The results showed a significant increase in the yield with the use of solid and liquid digestate, as well as with NPK, in all growing seasons, while the microelement contents (Zn, Mn, and Cu) in the leaves were at optimum level. The applied treatments did not increase the plant-available nutrients (AL-P2O5, AL-K2O, Fe, Cu, and Zn) in the soil (except Mn). The application of DL2, MS1, and MS2 led to a higher Pb content in kohlrabi stems compared to the control, but the Pb content remained below the maximum permitted limit. Our research showed that digestate can be used as a valuable source of nutrients for kohlrabi production, with a low risk of soil and plant contamination by heavy metals. However, the control of soil, digestates, and manure quality is recommended.

1. Introduction

The increase in the world population would not be possible without a parallel growth in food production that can be achieved thanks to the use of fertilizers [1]. The intensive use of high doses of mineral fertilizers, especially nitrogen (N) ones, has led to several issues: a high cost, possible nitrate pollution, and the loss of soil carbon (C). Given this, the need for environmentally friendly agricultural production is growing, and therefore organic amendments such as composts or manures have been extensively studied in the past. Additionally, in recent years, the possibility of using digestate as organic amendments for improving soils has been investigated [2,3,4]. Digestate can also be used as a fertilizer, allowing the circulation of plant nutrients while reducing the need for mineral fertilizers [5]. Reducing the use of mineral fertilizers leads to positive effects concerning resource conservation, climate change mitigation, and soil quality maintenance [2].
Digestate is formed as a result of the anaerobic digestion process, i.e., the process of fermentation, one of the methods that is widely known for organic waste utilization. The result of this process is biogas and postdigestion matter, a nutrient-rich plant residue (digestate), which can be used as a fertilizer in agriculture [3]. Digestate may contain significant amounts of nutrients such as N, phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) in an easily available form for plants, and because of the rapidity of the release of nutrients from digestate, it resembles mineral fertilizers. It also contains a portion of organic matter, which can positively affect the physicochemical properties of soils [6,7]. According to some authors [8,9], solid digestates show a greater mineral N fraction (51–68% of total N), but other authors [10] found that some solid digestates have a lower mineral N fraction (24–36% of total N). As a soil amendment, the solid fraction of digestate has better potential than the liquid form, while the liquid fraction has better potential as a fertilizer than the solid form. However, the potential contamination of waters (surface and ground) with excess N and P by digestate soil application is a major environmental concern [11]. Additionally, much like some fertilizers (e.g., raw phosphates, industrial compost, and sewage sludge), digestate may contain heavy metals or different organic pollutants [6,12]. To prevent the accumulation of heavy metals, reducing their input into the soil is a strategic goal of soil protection policies in the Republic of Serbia [13]. According to Manojlovic et al. [14], before application in agriculture, it is necessary to analyze the composition of fertilizers and respect the maximum permissible concentrations of heavy metals in fertilizers, soil improvers, and special products, regulating their input into soils [13].
The use of digestate as a fertilizer has been studied in the production of different crops: watermelon [2], kohlrabi [15], alfalfa and spring wheat cultivation [16], tomato [17], etc. Kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes) belongs to the family Brassicaceae and is a vegetable closely related to cabbage, usually grown for its edible stem, but its leaves can also be eaten. It is a fast-growing plant that can be grown during spring, summer, and autumn for market supply, so it can be eaten fresh all year [18]. Because of the juicy texture and crisp and sweet taste of its edible stem, it is greatly valued. According to the USDA [19], 100 g of kohlrabi (fresh matter) contains around 1.7 g proteins, 6.2 g carbohydrates, and 3.6 g dietary fiber. It also contains different amounts of vitamins, such as vitamin C, vitamin B6, folate, niacin, thiamin, riboflavin, and pantothenic acid [20].
The research on digestates has mainly been dedicated to stability estimation to reduce odor, decay, and pathogens [11]. To the extent of our knowledge, the impacts of biogas digestate applications on the environment in terms of the availability of nutrients and heavy metals in soil have still not been explored enough. Following the stated facts, the objectives of this research were to examine the impact of digestate, manure, and mineral fertilizers on: (i) plant nutrient availability in soil, (ii) heavy metal availability in soil, and (iii) kohlrabi yield and mineral composition.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Site Description

The experiment was conducted for three growing seasons during the period 2019–2020 on three fields (to respect the crop rotation) that were used for vegetable production. The first growing season (autumn 2019) was at the Futog site, while the second (spring 2020) and third (autumn 2020) seasons were at the Nemanovci site. Both sites are located in the vicinity of Novi Sad, Serbia (Futog—45°15′59.4′′ N, 19°41′09.3′′ E; Nemanovci—45°19′03.8′′ N, 19°51′44.6′′ E and 45°19′05.5′′ N, 19°51′39.8′′ E). On both sites, the soil type is Luvic Chernozem [21], one of the most dominant soil types in the Vojvodina province. Some of the main features that characterize this soil type are the neutral to slightly alkaline reaction of the soil, as well as the good supply of easily available AL-P2O5 (ammonium lactate P2O5) and AL-K2O (ammonium lactate K2O). All three soils fell into the same category regarding pH value (slightly alkaline) and available phosphorus and potassium (optimally provided). The basic physical and chemical properties of the soil are given in Table 1.
The experiment was performed in conditions of drip irrigation. The average air temperatures during the kohlrabi vegetation in 2019 and 2020 were similar to the long-term average (Figure 1a). However, the amount of precipitation in autumn 2019 (Futog) and spring 2020 (Nemanovci) during the kohlrabi vegetation was lower than the long-term average (Figure 1b). On the other hand, the amount of precipitation during the kohlrabi vegetation in autumn 2020 at the Nemanovci site was higher than the long-term average. The mean monthly temperatures and total monthly precipitation during the experiment are given in Figure 1.

2.2. Experiment Design and Treatments

The experiment was conducted as a completely randomized block system in three replications, and individual plots were 1.75 m long and 1.20 m wide, while the space between the plots was 0.5 m. Each plot consisted of 32 kohlrabi plants (Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes), Quickstar (F1) cultivar, Sakata, planted in four rows (8 plants per row). Kohlrabi was planted with 30 cm spacing between the rows and 25 cm spacing within the rows. Eight fertilization treatments were incorporated into the soil:
  • Control treatment—without fertilization (Ø).
  • Solid digestate—100 kg N ha−1 (DS1).
  • Solid digestate—200 kg N ha−1 (DS2).
  • Liquid digestate—100 kg N ha−1 (DL1).
  • Liquid digestate—200 kg N ha−1 (DL2).
  • Solid manure—100 kg N ha−1 (MS1).
  • Solid manure—200 kg N ha−1 (MS2).
  • Standard fertilization with mineral fertilizers (NPK).
In total, there were 24 experimental plots for each season. Organic fertilizers were applied in the amount which brought 100 kg N ha−1 and 200 kg N ha−1 to soil (depending on the treatments), while mineral fertilizers (treatment 8) were applied in the amount of 100 kg N ha−1, 80 kg P2O5, and 100 kg K2O, as ammonium nitrate, superphosphate, and potassium chloride, respectively. This meant that solid digestate was applied in the amounts of 20.8 t ha−1 (DS1) and 41.7 t ha−1 (DS2), liquid digestate in the amounts of 16.4 t ha−1 (DL1) and 32.8 t ha−1 (DL2), and manure in the amounts of 14.1 t ha−1 (MS1) and 28.2 t ha−1 (MS2). The chemical compositions of applied fertilizers are presented in Table 2. The heavy element content in all fertilizers was below the French regulation by ministerial decree [22].
For all treatments, fertilizers were incorporated into the surface soil layer (0–30 cm) 10 days before kohlrabi planting. Kohlrabi seedlings were prepared by sowing seeds in 104 styrofoam seedling tray cavities (Futog 12/7/2019; Nemanovci 28/2/2020 and 20/7/2020) filled with a substrate for vegetable seedlings. Kohlrabi plants were transplanted after 36 days in autumn 2019, after 38 days in spring 2020, and after 39 days in autumn 2020, using a manual vegetable seedling transplanter. After transplanting the plants, a drip irrigation system was installed between the rows. At the time of transplanting, kohlrabi was watered with around 30 mm of water, and then, every 5–8 days until the thickening of the stem, with around 20 mm of water.

2.3. Sampling

2.3.1. Soil

Soil samples for analyzing the basic soil properties (Table 1) were taken every season before setting up the experiment. On every experimental site, three average samples (composed of 10 individual samples) were taken from the 0–30 soil layer. Additionally, during the experiment, soil samples were taken twice from every treatment repetition (8 × 3 = 24 experimental plots). The first sampling (24 composite soil samples) was carried out 10 days after fertilizer incorporation (before planting kohlrabi), and the second (24 composite soil samples) after harvesting kohlrabi. The one composite sample which represents an experimental plot was consistent with 5 individual soil samples collected from the same treatment repetition (0–30 cm depth). Samples were collected with a soil probe. There were 48 soil samples per season, and so there were 144 soil samples in total, plus an additional 9 samples for the analysis before the experimental set up. In the laboratory, the soil samples were air-dried, ground, and sieved through a 2 mm sieve.

2.3.2. Digestate and Manure

Digestates (solid and liquid) and manure used in all growing seasons were collected from the biogas plant Stara Moravica (Serbia). The basic feedstock for biogas production was chopped cattle manure, maize silage, and haylage. The solid digestate used in the experiment was taken fresh from the pile, while the liquid digestate was also taken fresh from the lagoon. The manure used as feedstock for biogas production was applied in the experiment.

2.3.3. Kohlrabi

Kohlrabi was harvested when it was commercially ripened. During the harvest, the mass of 4 enlarged overground kohlrabi stems and leaves were measured from two middle rows (8 plants in total) on each plot to determine the total yield and the content of macro and microelements, as well as heavy metal content. The total enlarged kohlrabi stem and leaf yield (g m−2) was calculated on the basis of the mean weight of 8 separate enlarged kohlrabi stems and leaves multiplied by the number of kohlrabi per square meter.

2.4. Analytical Determination

Analytical determination was performed on the samples of soil, digestate, manure, and enlarged kohlrabi stems and leaves.

2.4.1. Soil Analysis

Available P (AL-P2O5) and K (AL-K2O) were extracted from the soil with an AL solution of 0.1 mol L−1 ammonium lactate and 0.4 mol L−1 acetic acid, in the ratio of 1:20 (soil:solution) [23]. The available P2O5 content was determined spectrophotometrically (Shimadzu, UV-2600, Kyoto, Japan), and the K2O content by flame photometry (Jenway 6105, Essex, UK). Mineral N concentration in the soil was determined by the Bremner [24] method. The available iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), lead (Pb), chromium (Cr), and cadmium (Cd) concentrations in the soil were determined after the extraction with DTPA (diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid)–TEA (triethanolamine) (0.005 mol L−1 DTPA + 0.01 mol L−1 CaCl2 + 0.1 mol L−1 TEA) buffered solution in the ratio 1:2 (soil:solution) [25]. The concentration was measured using an atomic absorption spectrometer (AAS, Shimadzu 6300, Kyoto, Japan) with the flame (FAAS) (Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn) and graphite (GFAAS) (Pb, Cr, Cd) techniques.

2.4.2. Digestate and Manure Analysis

The pH value of fresh solid samples was determined in water suspension, in the ratio of 1:5, using a Metrel Toledo FE 20 pH meter, while the pH of liquid samples was determined without water addition [26]. The dry matter content of fertilizers was determined gravimetrically after drying the samples to constant weight (70 °C for 24 h). Organic matter content was determined after incineration (loss on ignition) in an oven after 5 h at 550 °C [27]. The total C, N, and C/N contents were determined using a CHNS analyzer (Elementar Vario EL, GmbH, Hanau, Germany). After the microwave-assisted digestion of organic fertilizers with concentrated HNO3 acid [28], the flame technique (FAAS) was used to determine the contents of magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca), Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn, and the graphite technique (GFAAS) was used for Pb, Cr, and Cd determination. The phosphorus content (P2O5) was determined in the extract via molybdenum blue method [29] spectrophotometrically (Shimadzu, UV-2600, Kyoto, Japan), and the K2O content by flame photometry (Jenway 6105, Essex, UK).

2.4.3. Kohlrabi Bulb and Leaf Analyses

In the laboratory, the kohlrabi samples were washed several times with distilled water, and the excess water was wiped off using filter paper. Bulb slices and leaves separately obtained from 8 whole kohlrabies from each treatment were homogenized in a blender to obtain a representative average sample. After homogenization, fresh samples were dried in a food dryer (Excalibur) for 24 h at the temperature of 52 °C degrees. The average dry matter content of enlarged stems and leaves was calculated based on the dry matter content of 10 separate enlarged kohlrabi stems and leaves. Analyses were performed on dry samples. To determine the total Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, Pb, Cr, and Cd content in enlarged kohlrabi stems and leaves, wet digestion was used, with a mixture of nitric (HNO3) and perchloric (HClO4) acid [30], and the measuring was performed by AAS.

2.5. Statistics

The results from the study were subjected to a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), whereas the LSD test (p < 0.05) was used to detect the significant differences between the measured variables among treatments in STATISTICA 14 software. The first factor was the fertilization treatments, and the second factor was the growing season.

3. Results

3.1. Plant-Available Nutrients

The plant-available nutrient concentrations in the soil over three growing seasons, 10 days after fertilizer application (a day before planting) and after the kohlrabi harvest, are shown in Table 3. The fertilization treatments did not have a significant influence on the plant-available P2O5 and K2O, Mn, Cu, and Zn 10 days after fertilizer application. The plant-available Fe (DTPA-Fe) in the soil was reduced significantly with all fertilization treatments (except the NPK treatment) compared to the unfertilized control (10 days after fertilizer application). The growing season was a significant factor affecting the nutrient concentration in the soil. This is also related to there being different nutrient concentrations in the different fields where the experiments were set up.
After the kohlrabi harvest, the fertilization treatments did not have a significant influence on the plant-available P2O5 and K2O, Cu, and Zn. The organic fertilizer had neither a positive nor a negative effect on the DTPA-Fe (after kohlrabi harvest). However, the fertilization treatments, as well as the growing season, significantly affected the Mn concentration in the soil. The plant-available Mn (DTPA-Mn) increased significantly with the application of all treatments compared to the unfertilized control. Additionally, the treatment with DL2 increased the DTPA-Mn concentration in the soil significantly compared to the DS1 and DS2 treatments. The growing season was also a significant factor affecting the nutrient concentration in the soil after harvest.

3.2. Total Kohlrabi Yield

The application of solid and liquid digestates (treatments DS1, DS2, DL1, and DL2), as well as the NPK fertilizers, had a significant effect on the total yield of kohlrabi (Figure 2a). The yield of enlarged kohlrabi stems ranged from 3292 to 5005 g m−2 for the DS1, DS2, DL1, DL2, and NPK treatments and was significantly higher compared to the yield achieved with the control (2760 g m−2), MS1 (2839 g m−2), and MS2 (3074 g m−2) treatments. The highest kohlrabi bulb yield was achieved with the application of solid digestate in the amount which brought 200 kg N ha−1 (DS2) into the soil. The sequence of the increasing kohlrabi yield was as follows: DS2 > DL2 > DS1 > NPK > DL1. The total yield obtained with the MS1 and MS2 treatments was similar to the yield achieved with the control. The growing season was also a significant factor that influenced the kohlrabi bulb yield. The highest yield was obtained in the first growing season (autumn 2019), followed by the second (spring 2020), and then the third (autumn 2020).
The mass of the kohlrabi leaves was significantly affected by the fertilization treatments and growing season (Figure 2b). The highest kohlrabi mass yield was achieved with the application of solid and liquid digestate in the amount which brought 200 kg N ha−1 (DS2 and DL2) into the soil. Additionally, a higher leaf mass was achieved with the DS1, DL1, and NPK treatments compared to the unfertilized treatment. The highest mass of leaves was obtained in the second growing season (spring 2020), followed by the first (autumn 2019), and then the third (autumn 2020).

3.3. Available (DTPA) Heavy Metals in Experimental Soils

The DTPA-extractable heavy metal levels in the soils are shown in Table 4. The fertilization treatments did not result in a significant increase or decrease in the Pb and Cr concentration in the soil 10 days after fertilizer application, while MS1 and MS2 reduced the Cd concentration compared to control. The growing season was a significant factor affecting the heavy metal concentration in the soil, due to the different plots on which the experiment was performed and the different heavy metal concentrations in the soil.
The fertilization treatment as a factor significantly affected the Pb, Cr, and Cd concentrations in the soil after harvesting the kohlrabi. The application of manure (MS2 and MS1) and NPK fertilizers increased the concentration of Pb in the soil compared to the control and DL1 treatment. On the other hand, the Cr concentration in the soil was reduced with the application of all treatments compared to control, while the Cd concentration decreased with the DS2 and NPK treatments. The growing season was a significant factor for the concentration of heavy metals in the soil. In the second growing season (spring 2020), the Cd concentration in the soil after the harvest was higher compared to the concentration in the first and third growing seasons (autumn 2019 and autumn 2020).

3.4. Mineral Composition of Enlarged Kohlrabi Stems

The mineral composition of enlarged kohlrabi stem in the terms of microelements (Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn) is shown in Table 5. The effect of the fertilization treatments was not equal for all the examined microelements. Fertilization treatments, as well as growing seasons, were significant factors for the Fe content in the enlarged stem. The content of Fe decreased significantly with DS2, DL2, MS1, MS2, and NPK treatments, compared to control, and DL1 treatment. Additionally, application of liquid digestate (DL2 treatment) decreased Mn and Zn content in the enlarged stem. However, the source of variation for Zn content in enlarged kohlrabi stem was not either the treatments, or growing seasons.

3.5. Mineral Composition of Kohlrabi Leaves

Table 6 shows the mineral composition of kohlrabi leaves (Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn), which differed significantly among the treatments, depending on the growing season. Fertilization treatments, as well as growing seasons, were significant factors for the Mn content in the leaves. Manganese content in the leaves reduced significantly with the mineral fertilizers application, compared to control. Additionally, the Mn content in the leaves was higher in the second growing season (spring 2020) compared to others. The growing season was the significant source of variation for the mineral composition of kohlrabi leaves.

3.6. Heavy Metal Content in Enlarged Kohlrabi Stems and Leaves

Table 7 shows the content of heavy metals in the enlarged kohlrabi stems and leaves, which differed significantly among the treatments depending on the growing season. The application of DL2, MS1, and MS2 led to a higher Pb content in the enlarged kohlrabi stems compared to the control and the DS1 treatment. The mineral fertilizers (NPK) also increased the Pb content in the enlarged kohlrabi stems compared to the DS1 treatment. On the other hand, a significantly lower Cd content in the enlarged kohlrabi stems was determined by the application of solid digestate (DS1 and DS2) and manure (MS2) compared to the control, DL1, and DL2 treatments. The lead content in the kohlrabi leaves increased significantly with the NPK treatment compared to control and DS1, DL1, DL2, and MS2 treatments. Additionally, the application of solid digestate in the amount which brought 200 kg N ha−1 into the soil (DS2) increased the Pb content in the leaves in relation to the control but decreased the Cr content. The application of manure (MS1 and MS2) and liquid digestate (DL1) reduced the Cr content in the leaves. The growing season was the significant source of variation for the heavy metal content in the enlarged kohlrabi stems and leaves.

4. Discussion

Plant-available P2O5 and K2O in the soil in our research did not differ significantly depending on the fertilization treatments (Table 3). The previous findings of Tan et al. [31] showed that digestate application in the amount of 114 and 228 kg N ha−1 improved the available P and K levels in the soil. On the other hand, in the research conducted by Panuccio et al. [32] using a pot experiment, the K+ was not influenced in a sandy loam soil amended with the liquid digestate at the concentrations of 10, 25, and 50% liquid digestate in the total amount of soil. The same authors stated that the amount of K+ was increased in both soils (loamy sand and sandy loam) amended with fresh solid digestate at the application rates of 50 and 75% of solid digestate to the soil.
Significant season-to-season variability in the concentration of microelements (Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn) in their available forms was observed. There was a difference in the DTPA-microelement concentration in the soil, depending on whether the treatments were performed with or without organic fertilizers or on the growing season. A lower DTPA-Fe concentration in the soil was observed with the application of organic fertilizers compared to unfertilized control (10 days after fertilizer application) (Table 3), probably due to the formation of insoluble complexes between organic acids (released from organic substrates after being added to the soil) and Fe and Mn [33,34]. On the other hand, earlier reports stated that the application of manure significantly increased the total Fe, Cu, Zn, and Mn contents in soil [35], and the application of digestate (solid or liquid) increased the DTPA extractable Mn fractions [36], which coincides with our results for the increased DTPA-Mn contents in the postharvest soil (Table 3). According to Möller and Müller [37], the conflicting and confusing evidence of microelement availability in the soil treated with digestate shows the importance of taking into consideration all the processes which may affect the availability of microelements, such as the digestate composition, the absorption of elements into the solid fraction, the formation of a complex in solution, and precipitation as carbonate, phosphates, sulfide, and hydroxides. They also concluded that the operating conditions of the digester can affect the availability of microelements from digestates.
In all growing seasons, the application of solid and liquid digestates (both doses), as well as the application of mineral NPK fertilizers, had a positive effect on the total yield of the enlarged kohlrabi stems (Figure 2a). Our results are in agreement with many previous studies, which have also observed a positive effect of digestate application on the yield of different crops, such as corn and wheat [38], red tomato [39], and barley [40]. Digestate contains available N, P, and K, and its soil application may increase the content of chlorophyll in leaves, which stimulates photosynthesis and increases crop yield [41]. In addition, the degradation of organic matter during the anaerobic process could result in producing forms of N, P, and K that are more readily available than those from feedstock [42]. In the research of Ertani et al. [43] concerning the biostimulatory effect of digestates, they found a significant effect of bioactive digestate compounds on maize plants, acting as auxin-like growth promoters. According to Tan et al. [31], long-term digestate application can improve soil fertility and plant yield. The positive effect on increasing kohlrabi yield (enlarged stems and leaves) with manure application was not registered in all growing seasons (Figure 2). Some studies reported that the application of manure did not increase yields [44,45], due to the slow release of N from manure for crop uptake. On the other hand, digestate is characterized by a higher proportion of NH4-N in the total N content in comparison to that in other organic fertilizers [46]. According to Zavattaro et al. [47], the factors that influence the yield response in the application of manure are the type of manure, the climatic conditions, and the type of crop. The manure used as feedstock for biogas production may contain large amounts of undecomposed straw. Manure and straw application may temporarily induce the biological immobilization of N in soil, which may have a negative effect on N uptake and growth [48]. In all growing seasons, the application of solid and liquid digestates (both doses), as well as the application of mineral NPK fertilizers, had a positive effect on the kohlrabi leaf yield. Digestate contains a large number of active substances, such as monosaccharides, nucleic acids, vitamins, amino acids, and phytohormones (gibberellins), which can promote plant growth [49,50]. In the second growing season (spring 2020, Nemanovci), besides the solid digestate, the liquid digestate also increased the kohlrabi leaf mass, and the mineral fertilizers did as well. Nabel et al. [51] found that fertilizing the Sida hermaphrodita plant with digestate resulted in a fivefold increase in biomass yield.
The higher leaf mass obtained in the second season (spring 2020) compared to the other seasons was probably a consequence of the longer days in spring than in autumn. In the research of Caruso et al. [52], the winter–spring production of the Diplotaxis tenuifolia plant resulted in a higher leaf surface index, as well as a higher dry matter content compared to the production of autumn–winter crops. Additionally, during the spring growing period, an increase in the soil temperature promotes faster kohlrabi plant growth, due to the more intensive uptake of nutrients from the soil, early maturation, and higher leaf mass. Plants grown during the spring season obtained large leaves and the highest unmarketable yield (although, in the case of kohlrabi plants, young leaves can be used for human consumption in addition to the storage stem). Conversely, during the autumn production of kohlrabi, due to shortening of the day, the limitation of the light, and the lower air and soil temperatures, the plant nutrients from the leaves descend to the upper part of the enlarged storage stem, which increases the yield, so the yield of the edible part is high. In this way, plants are prepared for stressful conditions by depositing nutrients from the leaves into the parts of the plant that provide nutrient storage and survival. Although the only significant difference observed was between planting dates, generally, the aboveground biomass, stem weight, diameter, and yield of the plants planted in autumn were greater than those of the spring planting dates due to the more suitable environmental conditions for kohlrabi [15]. On the other hand, the yield obtained in autumn 2020 was lower than in the first and second seasons, probably due to the lower air temperature (Figure 1) during kohlrabi vegetation than in autumn 2019.
Different studies have investigated the advantages and potential risks of digestate use [32,37,53]. In general, digestates as organic fertilizers are considered a source of plant nutrients and increasers of soil organic matter, but some potential contaminants may be present in them (heavy metals). Usually, organic materials do not contain high levels of heavy metals, but their use can still increase or decrease the content of heavy metals in soil, and this depends on the type of organic fertilizer, the pH value of the fertilizer, the soil type, and many other factors. The application of organic fertilizer in the long term could be a potential source of soil pollution, because of heavy metal accumulation in manure [54]. The concentration of DTPA-Pb, as well as -Cr and -Cd, was influenced by digestates, manure, and mineral fertilizer application (Table 4). The increased concentration of DTPA-Pb (both doses of manure) in the soil (Table 4) could be explained by the addition of the organic fertilizer (Table 2) and by the unfavorable water regime. For instance, Ayaz et al. [55] stated that the application of biochar derived from pig manure digestate increased the heavy metal (Pb and Cr) concentrations in soil under different moisture regimes. In their research, digestate biochar application significantly increased Pb and Cr concentrations in flooded soil moisture conditions, compared to the treatment without biochar application. In our research, the amount of precipitation during the kohlrabi vegetation in 2020 at the Nemanovci site was much higher than the long-term average (Figure 1b). In some treatments, the application of organic fertilizers led to a reduction in the DTPA-Cr and -Cd concentrations in the soil (Table 4). The availability of heavy metals in soil is strongly affected by different factors. One of them is the soil organic matter, which, during the process of the formation of a stable organic fraction, can lead to heavy metal immobilization or adsorption [56]. According to Shan et al. [57], manure decomposition through different microbial processes could increase the humic substances in soil, and according to Yu et al. [58], humic substances have a significant role in forming complexes with metal ions. It has been reported that manure application to a slightly contaminated soil significantly decreased the available Cd and Pb in the soil [59], probably by converting the available metal forms to stable fractions, such as oxide-bound, carbonate-bound, and organic-matter-bound forms of Fe and Mn [60]. Our results showed a different effect of organic fertilizers on the concentration of heavy metals in the soil. For example, the Cd concentration in the soil decreased with the manure (both doses) treatments 10 days after fertilizer application compared to the control, while after the kohlrabi harvest, the Cd decreased with the application of solid digestate in the amount which brought 200 kg N ha−1 (DS2) into the soil compared to control. Previous research [61] has shown that with an increase in the soil pH and organic matter, the heavy metal availability generally decreases. It would be expected that the total content of heavy metals in the soil increases or remains stable with the application of organic material. In an 11-year field study, Wierzbowska [62], using different organic materials, found that the total content of heavy metals in the soil was increased by organic amendment compared to control. On the other hand, in the same research, the availability of heavy metals was often not increased. Thus, heavy metal immobilization in the long term seems unlikely [63]. Additionally, Möller and Müller [37] showed a decrease in the heavy metal availability in pot experiments. However, in the research of Tang et al. [64], after 5 years of the application of biogas slurry in wheat and rice production (N rate: 150 kg N ha−1 for wheat, 250 kg N ha−1 for rice, annually) no increase in the total Pb and Cd contents in the soil was observed. Our study only measured the DTPA available metals in the soil, and not the total element content, so the effect of the organic fertilizers on the total content cannot be commented on.
In terms of the macronutrient content in the enlarged stems (Table 5), a reduced uptake and accumulation of Fe were noticed with organic (DS2, DL2, MS1, and MS2) and mineral fertilizer application. This could be explained by the higher precipitation in spring, which was far above the long-term average (Figure 1b). Wet soil conditions in calcareous soils, for example, are known to cause symptoms of Fe deficiency (chlorosis) in soybeans [65]. In the enlarged kohlrabi stems and leaves, the content of microelements and heavy metals was determined in the following order Fe > Mn > Zn > Cu > Cr > Pb > Cd. In our experiment, this is in line with the content of microelements and heavy metals in digestates and manure, and it is in accordance with other studies [64,66], where the content of heavy metals in wheat and rice was determined in the same order. The mineral composition (Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn) of the kohlrabi leaves was not affected by the application of digestates and manure compared to the control (Table 6). In a field experiment carried out from 2014 to 2016, Przygocka and Grzebisz [67] observed a considerably higher Zn content in maize grain after digestate application, while in the research of Tang et al. [64], the application of slurry from a biogas plant significantly increased the Zn and Cu contents in rice and wheat. The use of digestate and manure in our research fully satisfied the kohlrabi’s needs for the necessary microelements when compared to the recommended limit values of the optimal microelement contents (for Zn, 20–60 ppm; for Mn, 50–150 ppm; and for Cu, 5–12 ppm) in young, fully developed leaves, immediately before the harvest, according to Bergmann [68]. The lead content in the enlarged stems (Table 7) increased with MS1, MS2, and DL2 fertilizer application, and the Pb content in the leaves increased with the NPK treatments, due to the increased soil DTPA-Pb (Table 4) and inputs through organic (Table 2) and mineral fertilizers [69]. This suggests that the heavy metal content in plants can be related to the plant-available fractions in the soil. On the other hand, Tang et al. [64] reported that the heavy metal content in plant roots is related to the total content of heavy metals in the soil rather than to plant-available fractions, and according to Shahid et al. [70], it is probably due to passive transport. A study by Barłóg [66] examined the chemical composition of cattle slurry and digestate, as well as the effect of digestates and manure on trace metal transfer from soil to plants (wheat and barley). These authors concluded that, despite the microelement and Cd content increase due to fertilization with digestate and cattle slurry, the content remained below the European Union’s permissible limits, except for the Pb content. In the same research, however, the increased Pb content was influenced by factors other than fertilization. According to the Republic of Serbia’s regulations [71], the maximum permitted contents of Pb and Cd for stem vegetables are 0.3 and 0.1 mg kg−1 wet weight, respectively. In order to convert to wet weight, the data for the dry matter content are given in the caption under Table 7. In our study, the Pb and Cd contents in the enlarged kohlrabi stems and leaves remained below the maximum permitted limit.

5. Conclusions

The application of digestates (solid and liquid) before planting kohlrabi led to a significant increase in the kohlrabi yield in all growing seasons, as well as the application of mineral NPK fertilizers. Manure could be used to improve the nutritional potential of soil in the next few years, but in the first year, a positive impact on the yield of plants with short vegetation periods, such as kohlrabi, should not always be expected. The use of digestate and manure in the amount of 100 and 200 kg N ha−1 in our research fully satisfied kohlrabi’s needs for the necessary microelements. Organic fertilizers are complete fertilizers because they contain all the necessary macro- and microelements. The results showed that in kohlrabi production systems, digestates can fully replace mineral NPK fertilizers, achieving stable high yields while maintaining quality. Additionally, in this research, we found that digestates can be used as regular fertilizers, because they either contain nutrients in an easily accessible form and/or are easily mineralized in soil, so nutrients are available in the year of application.
Furthermore, the results clearly indicate that digestates, both solid and liquid fractions (as well as manure), could be utilized as fertilizers in agricultural production with a low risk of contaminating the food chain with heavy metals. This refers to the digestate made from the manure of cattle that are mainly fed with fodder produced on a farm. In any case, the control of soil and the quality of organic fertilizers is necessary and recommended before their application.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M., R.Č., Z.S.I. and D.K.; methodology, M.M., R.Č. and D.K.; software, D.K. and K.P.; investigation, D.K., M.Š. and M.V.; laboratory analyses, D.K. and M.V.; writing—original draft preparation, D.K.; writing—review and editing, M.M. and K.P.; supervision, M.M.; funding acquisition, M.M. and R.Č. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the project funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, the Republic of Serbia (no. 451-03-68/2022-14/200117).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research was carried out with the cooperation of the biogas plant Gakovac, Stara Moravica, Serbia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Carvalho, F.P. Pesticides, environment, and food safety. Food Energy Secur. 2017, 6, 48–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alburquerque, J.A.; De la Fuente, C.; Campoy, M.; Carrasco, L.; Nájera, I.; Baixauli, C.; Bernal, M.P. Agricultural use of digestate for horticultural crop production and improvement of soil properties. Eur. J. Agron. 2012, 43, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Koszel, M.; Lorencowicz, E. Agricultural use of biogas digestate as a replacement fertilizers. Agric. Agric. Sci. Proc. 2015, 7, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Reuland, G.; Sigurnjak, I.; Dekker, H.; Michels, E.; Meers, E. The Potential of Digestate and the Liquid Fraction of Digestate as Chemical Fertiliser Substitutes under the RENURE Criteria. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Holm-Nielsen, J.B.; Al Seadi, T.; Oleskowicz-Popiel, P. The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 5478–5484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Odlare, M.; Pell, M.; Svensson, K. Changes in soil chemical and microbiological properties during 4 years of application of various organic residues. Waste Manag. 2008, 28, 1246–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rehl, T.; Müller, J. Life cycle assessment of biogas digestate processing technologies. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2011, 56, 92–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tambone, F.; Genevini, P.; D’Imporzano, G.; Adani, F. Assessing amendment properties of digestate by studying the organic matter composition and the degree of biological stability during the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of MSW. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 3140–3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Tambone, F.; Scaglia, B.; D’Imporzano, G.; Schievano, A.; Salati, V.; Adani, F. Assessing amendment and fertilizing properties of digestates from anaerobic digestion through a comparative study with digested sludge and compost. Chemosphere 2010, 81, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Teglia, C.; Tremier, A.; Martel, J.L. Characterization of solid digestates: Part 1, review of existing indicators to assess solid digestates agricultural use. Waste Biomass Valorization 2011, 2, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nkoa, R. Agricultural benefits and environmental risks of soil fertilization with anaerobic digestates: A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2014, 34, 473–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Kupper, T.; Bürge, D.; Bachmann, H.J.; Güsewell, S.; Mayer, J. Heavy metals in source-separated compost and digestates. Waste Manag. 2014, 34, 867–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Official Gazette of RS no. 31/2018: Rulebook on Conditions for Classification and Determination of Quality of Plant Nutrition Products, Deviations of Nutrient Content and Minimum and Maximum Values of Permitted Deviation of Nutrient Content and The Content of The Declaration and Manner of Marking Plant Nutrition Products, Annex 5. Available online: https://www.pravno-informacioni-sistem.rs/SlGlasnikPortal/prilozi/5.html&doctype=reg&abc=cba&eli=true&eliActId=425734&regactid=425734 (accessed on 10 December 2021).
  14. Manojlović, M.; Kovačević, D.; Čabilovski, R.; Petković, K.; Štrbac, M. Organic fertilizers as a source of microelements and potentially toxic elements. In Proceedings of the 6th International Scientific Meeting, the International Soil Science Symposium on Soil Science & Plant Nutrition, Samsun, Turkey, 18–19 December 2021; pp. 127–133. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lošák, T.; Hlušek, J.; Válka, T.; Elbl, J.; Vítěz, T.; Bělíková, H.; Von Bennewitz, E. The effect of fertilisation with digestate on kohlrabi yields and quality. Plant Soil Environ. 2016, 62, 274–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Koszel, M.; Kocira, A.; Lorencowicz, E. The evaluation of the use of biogas plant digestate as a fertilizer in alfalfa and spring wheat cultivation. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2016, 25, 3258–3264. [Google Scholar]
  17. Panuccio, M.R.; Mallamaci, C.; Attinà, E.; Muscolo, A. Using Digestate as Fertilizer for a Sustainable Tomato Cultivation. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Biesiada, A.; Kolota, E. Evaluation of some kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes L.) cultivars for early cropping. In Spontaneous and Induced Variation for the Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops, 1st ed.; Nowaczyk, P., Ed.; Univ. Press Univ. of Technology and Life Sciences: Bydgoszcz, Poland, 2007; pp. 39–44. [Google Scholar]
  19. USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference. Available online: https://www.nal.usda.gov/legacy/fnic/food-composition (accessed on 10 December 2021).
  20. Biesiada, A. Effect of flat covers and plant density on yielding and quality of kohlrabi. J. Elementol. 2008, 13, 167–173. [Google Scholar]
  21. IUSS Working Group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps; World Soil Resources Reports No. 106; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2014; pp. 12–21. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ministère de L’agriculture et de L’alimentation Arrêté du 13 Juin 2017 Approuvant un Cahier des Charges Pour la Mise Sur le Marché et L’utilisation de Digestats de Méthanisation Agricoles en Tant Que Matières Fertilisantes. Available online: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/download/pdf?id=1ny8GcfBdZvHQnbB6O81fnxyq2uN_TKeBRRXw8U00MM (accessed on 3 September 2021).
  23. Egner, H.; Riehm, H.; Domingo, W.R. Investigations of the chemical soil analysis as a basis for the evaluation of nutrient status in soil II: Chemical extraction methods for phosphorus and potassium determination. K. Lantbruksakad. Ann. 1960, 26, 195–215. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bremner, J.M. Nitrogen availability indexes. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 2nd ed.; Norman, A.G., Ed.; American Society of Agronomy: Medison, WI, USA, 1965; Agronomy 9; pp. 1324–1345. [Google Scholar]
  25. ISO 14870:2001 Soil Quality—Extraction of Trace Elements by Buffered DTPA Solution. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/25232.html (accessed on 10 December 2021).
  26. EN 13037:2011. Soil Improvers and Growing Media—Determination of pH. (1:5 Water). Available online: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/a127e814-60b7-42b0-80c7-453c28968d64/en-13037-2011 (accessed on 10 December 2021).
  27. EN 13040:2007. Soil Improvers and Growing Media. Sample Preparation for Chemical and Physical Tests, Determination of Dry Matter Content, Moisture Content And Laboratory Compacted Bulk Density. Available online: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/f65ff417-8656-4f00-a840-a6ca1846fb6f/en-13040-2007 (accessed on 10 December 2021).
  28. Peters, J.; Combs, S.; Hoskins, B.; Jarman, J.; Kovar, J.; Watson, M.; Wolf, A.; Wolf, N. Recommended Methods of Manure Analysis, 1st ed.; University of Wisconsin Cooperative Extension Publishing: Madison, WI, USA, 2003; pp. 1–58. [Google Scholar]
  29. APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kalra, Y. Handbook of Reference Methods for Plant Analysis, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1997; pp. 1–320. [Google Scholar]
  31. Tan, F.; Zhu, Q.; Guo, X.; He, L. Effects of digestate on biomass of a selected energy crop and soil properties. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 927–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Panuccio, M.R.; Romeo, F.; Mallamaci, C.; Muscolo, A. Digestate application on two different soils: Agricultural benefit and risk. Waste Biomass Valorization 2021, 12, 4341–4353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Haynes, R.J.; Murtaza, G.; Naidu, R. Inorganic and organic constituents and contaminants of biosolids: Implications for land application. Adv. Agron. 2009, 104, 165–267. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gell, K.; van Groenigen, J.W.; Cayuela, M.L. Residues of bioenergy production chains as soil amendments: Immediate and temporal phytotoxicity. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 2017–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. BenYin, L.I.; Huang, S.M.; Ming-Bao, W.E.I.; Zhang, H.L.; Jian-Ming, X.U.; Xin-Ling, R.U.A.N. Dynamics of soil and grain micronutrients as affected by long-term fertilization in an aquic inceptisol. Pedosphere 2010, 20, 725–735. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kataki, S.; Hazarika, S.; Baruah, D.C. By-products of bioenergy systems (anaerobic digestion and gasification) as sources of plant nutrients: Scope of processed application and effect on soil and crop. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2019, 21, 556–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Möller, K.; Müller, T. Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: A review. Eng. Life Sci. 2012, 12, 242–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Siebielec, G.; Siebielec, S.; Lipski, D. Long-term impact of sewage sludge, digestate and mineral fertilizers on plant yield and soil biological activity. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 187, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Barzee, T.J.; Edalati, A.; El-Mashad, H.; Wang, D.; Scow, K.; Zhang, R. Digestate biofertilizers support similar or higher tomato yields and quality than mineral fertilizer in a subsurface drip fertigation system. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2019, 3, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Doyeni, M.O.; Stulpinaite, U.; Baksinskaite, A.; Suproniene, S.; Tilvikiene, V. The Effectiveness of Digestate Use for Fertilization in an Agricultural Cropping System. Plants 2021, 10, 1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, J.P.; Cao, C.G.; Cai, M.L.; Yuan, B.Z.; Zhai, J. Effect of different nitrogen nutrition and soil water potential on physiological parameters and yield of hybrid rice. J. Plant Nutr. Fertil 2008, 14, 199–206. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang, C.; Yun, S.; Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Xu, H.; Du, T. Low-cost composited accelerants for anaerobic digestion of dairy manure: Focusing on methane yield, digestate utilization and energy evaluation. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 263, 517–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ertani, A.; Pizzeghello, D.; Baglieri, A.; Cadili, V.; Tambone, F.; Gennari, M.; Nardi, S. Agro-industrial residues and their biological activity on maize (Zea mays L.) metabolism. J. Geochem. Explor. 2013, 129, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, F.; Peizhi, X.; Shuanhu, T.; Jiansheng, C.; Kaizhi, X.; Xu, H. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer and Composts Produced from Chicken, Swine and Cattle Manures on Yields and Quality of Leaf Vegetables. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2008, 24, 283–286. [Google Scholar]
  45. Chen, Y.; Camps-Arbestain, M.; Shen, Q.; Singh, B.; Cayuela, M.L. The long-term role of organic amendments in building soil nutrient fertility: A meta-analysis and review. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosystems 2018, 111, 103–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Risberg, K.; Cederlund, H.; Pell, M.; Arthurson, V.; Schnürer, A. Comparative characterization of digestate versus pig slurry and cow manure—Chemical composition and effects on soil microbial activity. Waste Manag. 2017, 61, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zavattaro, L.; Bechini, L.; Grignani, C.; Van Evert, F.K.; Mallast, J.; Spiegel, H.; Sandén, T.; Pecio, A.; Cervera, J.V.G.; Guzmán, G.; et al. Agronomic effects of bovine manure: A review of long-term European field experiments. Eur. J. Agron. 2017, 90, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, J.; Sun, N.; Xu, M.; Wang, S.; Zhang, J.; Cai, Z.; Cheng, Y. The influence of long-term animal manure and crop residue application on abiotic and biotic N immobilization in an acidified agricultural soil. Geoderma 2019, 337, 710–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, W.; Yang, Q.; Du, L. Soilless cultivation for high-quality vegetables with biogas manure in China: Feasibility and benefit analysis. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2009, 24, 300–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yu, F.; Luo, X.; Song, C.; Zhang, M.; Shan, S. Concentrated biogas slurry enhanced soil fertility and tomato quality. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 2010, 60, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nabel, M.; Schrey, S.D.; Poorter, H.; Koller, R.; Nagel, K.A.; Temperton, V.M.; Dietrich, C.C.; Briese, C.; Jablonowski, N.D. Coming late for dinner: Localized digestate depot fertilization for extensive cultivation of marginal soil with Sida hermaphrodita. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Caruso, G.; De Pascale, S.; Cozzolino, E.; Giordano, M.; El-Nakhel, C.; Cuciniello, A.; Cenvinzo, V.; Colla, G.; Rouphael, Y. Protein Hydrolysate or Plant Extract-based Biostimulants Enhanced Yield and Quality Performances of Greenhouse Perennial Wall Rocket Grown in Different Seasons. Plants 2019, 8, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Kataki, S.; Hazarika, S.; Baruah, D.C. Assessment of by-products of bioenergy systems (anaerobic digestion and gasification) as potential crop nutrient. Waste Manag. 2017, 59, 102–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Yang, X.; Li, Q.; Tang, Z.; Zhang, W.; Yu, G.; Shen, Q.; Zhao, F.J. Heavy metal concentrations and arsenic speciation in animal manure composts in China. Waste Manag. 2017, 64, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ayaz, M.; Stulpinaite, U.; Feiziene, D.; Tilvikiene, V.; Akthar, K.; Baltrėnaitė-Gedienė, E.; Striugas, N.; Rehmani, U.; Alam, S.; Iqbal, R.; et al. Pig manure digestate-derived biochar for soil management and crop cultivation in heavy metals contaminated soil. Soil Use Manag. 2021, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shaheen, S.M.; Rinklebe, J. Impact of emerging and low cost alternative amendments on the (im) mobilization and phytoavailability of Cd and Pb in a contaminated floodplain soil. Ecol. Eng. 2015, 74, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Shan, H.; Su, S.; Liu, R.; Li, S. Cadmium availability and uptake by radish (Raphanus sativus) grown in soils applied with wheat straw or composted pig manure. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 15208–15217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Yu, Y.; Wan, Y.; Camara, A.Y.; Li, H. Effects of the addition and aging of humic acid-based amendments on the solubility of Cd in soil solution and its accumulation in rice. Chemosphere 2018, 196, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Wan, Y.; Huang, Q.; Wang, Q.; Yu, Y.; Su, D.; Qiao, Y.; Li, H. Accumulation and bioavailability of heavy metals in an acid soil and their uptake by paddy rice under continuous application of chicken and swine manure. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 384, 121293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Li, B.; Yang, L.; Wang, C.Q.; Zheng, S.Q.; Xiao, R.; Guo, Y. Effects of organic-inorganic amendments on the cadmium fraction in soil and its accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 13762–13772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Colombo, C.; Palumbo, G.; He, J.Z.; Pinton, R.; Cesco, S. Review on iron availability in soil: Interaction of Fe minerals, plants and microbes. J. Soils Sediments 2014, 14, 538–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wierzbowska, A.; Hanus-Fajerska, E.; Muszynska, E.; Ciarkowska, K. Natural organic amendments for improved phytoremediation of polluted soils: A review of recent progress. Pedosphere 2018, 26, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  63. Insam, H.; Gómez-Brandón, M.; Ascher, J. Manure-based biogas fermentation residues–Friend or foe of soil fertility? Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015, 84, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tang, Y.; Wang, L.; Carswell, A.; Misselbrook, T.; Shen, J.; Han, J. Fate and transfer of heavy metals following repeated biogas slurry application in a rice-wheat crop rotation. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 270, 110938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Erskine, W.; Saxena, N.P.; Saxena, M.C. Iron deficiency in lentil: Yield loss and geographic distribution in a germplasm collection. Plant Soil 1993, 151, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Barłóg, P.; Hlisnikovský, L.; Kunzová, E. Concentration of trace metals in winter wheat and spring barley as a result of digestate, cattle slurry, and mineral fertilizer application. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 4769–4785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Przygocka-Cyna, K.; Grzebisz, W. The multifactorial effect of digestate on the availability of soil elements and grain yield and its mineral profile—The case of maize. Agronomy 2020, 10, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Bergmann, W. Farbatlas Ernährungsstörungen bei Kulturpflanzen: Visuelle und Analytische Diagnose, 2nd ed.; Fischer: Jena, Germany, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  69. Moreno-Jiménez, E.; Fernández, J.M.; Puschenreiter, M.; Williams, P.N.; Plaza, C. Availability and transfer to grain of As, Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in a barley agri-system: Impact of biochar, organic and mineral fertilizers. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 219, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shahid, M.; Dumat, C.; Khalid, S.; Schreck, E.; Xiong, T.; Niazi, N.K. Foliar heavy metal uptake, toxicity and detoxification in plants: A comparison of foliar and root metal uptake. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 325, 36–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Official Gazette of RS no. 76/2019: Regulation Amending the Regulation on Maximum Residue Levels of Pesticides in Food and Feed and For Feed and Food Which Are Subject to The Analysis of The Maximum Permitted Amount of Residues of Plant Protection Products, Annex 5. Available online: https://www.pravno-informacioni-sistem.rs/SlGlasnikPortal/prilozi/5.html&doctype=reg&abc=cba&eli=true&eliActId=427071&regactid=427071 (accessed on 10 December 2021).
Figure 1. (a) Average monthly temperature in Novi Sad (2019−2020) and long-term average (1981−2010); (b) monthly precipitation in Novi Sad (2019−2020) and long-term average (1981−2010).
Figure 1. (a) Average monthly temperature in Novi Sad (2019−2020) and long-term average (1981−2010); (b) monthly precipitation in Novi Sad (2019−2020) and long-term average (1981−2010).
Agronomy 12 00871 g001aAgronomy 12 00871 g001b
Figure 2. (a) The total yield of enlarged kohlrabi stems; (b) the total yield of kohlrabi leaves. Ø, control; DS1, solid digestate 100 kg N ha−1; DS2, solid digestate 200 kg N ha−1; DL1, liquid digestate 100 kg N ha−1; DL2, liquid digestate 200 kg N ha−1; MS1, solid manure 100 kg N ha−1; MS2, solid manure 200 kg N ha−1; NPK, mineral fertilizer. Values followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. (a) The total yield of enlarged kohlrabi stems; (b) the total yield of kohlrabi leaves. Ø, control; DS1, solid digestate 100 kg N ha−1; DS2, solid digestate 200 kg N ha−1; DL1, liquid digestate 100 kg N ha−1; DL2, liquid digestate 200 kg N ha−1; MS1, solid manure 100 kg N ha−1; MS2, solid manure 200 kg N ha−1; NPK, mineral fertilizer. Values followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Agronomy 12 00871 g002aAgronomy 12 00871 g002b
Table 1. Basic physical and chemical properties of the soil before conducting the experiment.
Table 1. Basic physical and chemical properties of the soil before conducting the experiment.
ParameterSeason I Autumn 2019 FutogSeason II Spring 2020 NemanovciSeason III Autumn 2020 Nemanovci
% Coarse sand0.60.10.1
% Fine sand50.1643.7438.98
% Silt29.8437.0437.8
% Clay19.419.1223.12
pH KCl7.16 ± 0.077.42 ± 0.047.21 ± 0.10
pH H2O7.83 ± 0.058.07 ± 0.047.78 ± 0.09
% CaCO32.95 ± 0.066.26 ± 0.044.17 ±0.02
AL-P2O5 mg kg−1175 ± 11.63302 ± 17.14194 ± 15.48
AL-K2O mg kg−1211 ± 23.65339 ± 41.47369 ± 14.94
Available Fe mg kg−19.27 ± 1.007.97 ± 1.7011.17 ± 1.53
Available Mn mg kg−117.84 ± 1.2019.21 ± 1.5918.46 ± 0.81
Available Cu mg kg−12.89 ± 0.654.62 ± 0.535.58 ± 0.71
Available Zn mg kg−10.89 ± 0.102.96 ± 0.163.53 ± 0.44
Available Pb mg kg−11.90 ± 0.152.42 ± 0.172.54 ± 0.08
Available Cr mg kg−10.15 ± 0.010.04 ± 0.010.01 ± 0.00
Available Cd mg kg−10.06 ± 0.010.08 ± 0.010.08 ± 0.01
±, standard error.
Table 2. Chemical properties of organic fertilizers and annual inputs of elements.
Table 2. Chemical properties of organic fertilizers and annual inputs of elements.
Chemical Properties of FertilizersRegulationAnnual Inputs of Dry Matter and Elements with the Amount of Fertilizer Equal to 100 kg N ha−1
ParameterSolid DigestateLiquid DigestateSolid
Manure
Heavy Metal Limits ** Heavy Metal Inputs ***Solid DigestateLiquid DigestateSolid Manure
pH H2O8.48 ± 0.027.48 ± 0.148.82 ± 0.07/////
C/N25.6 ± 0.984.3 ± 0.0520.2 ± 0.60/////
% in FM * t ha−1t ha−1t ha−1
DM28.85 ± 0.786.98 ± 0.3737.56 ± 0.69//1.751.141.98
g kg−1 DM *g kg−1 FMg kg−1 DM//kg ha−1
OM618 ± 12.5050 ± 1.17714 ± 8.19//37458173755
Total N 17 ± 0.486.1 ± 0.1719 ± 0.55//100100100
Total C 422 ± 5.8926 ± 0.59383 ± 1.43//25594302018
Total P2O59.4 ± 0.612.2 ± 0.099.5 ± 0.29//573650
Total K2O12.8 ± 0.343.6 ± 0.1020.1 ± 0.72//7859106
Mg4.02 ± 0.041.28 ± 0.0410.37 ± 0.32//242155
Ca4.29 ± 0.074.14 ± 0.057.74 ± 0.07//266841
mg kg−1 DMmg kg−1
FM
mg kg−1 DMmg kg−1
DM
g ha year−1g ha−1
Fe400 ± 8.33264 ± 9.06734 ± 27.47//242443343862
Mn65 ± 3.0832 ± 2.13102 ± 6.82//391524536
Cu9.3 ± 0.175.2 ± 0.2615.5 ± 1.01<600350568582
Zn32.8 ± 0.6921.5 ± 0.5558.8 ± 1.22<15001500199352310
Pbndnd9.04 ± 0.05<180300ndnd48
Cr16.4 ± 0.7112.2 ± 0.8519.2 ± 0.35<12030099200101
Cdndndnd<35ndndnd
* DM, dry matter; FM, fresh matter; nd, not detected; ±, standard error. ** Maximum heavy metal limits according to the French regulation [22]. *** Regulating inputs of heavy metals to soils (g ha year−1) according to the Serbian regulation [13].
Table 3. Plant-available nutrients in the soil (mg kg−1) as a result of digestates, manure, and mineral fertilizer application.
Table 3. Plant-available nutrients in the soil (mg kg−1) as a result of digestates, manure, and mineral fertilizer application.
Treatment10 Days after Fertilizer Applicationafter Kohlrabi Harvest
AL-
P2O5
AL-
K2O
FeMnCuZnAL-
P2O5
AL-
K2O
FeMnCuZn
Ø219 a314 a11.9 a17.3 ab4.6 ab2.5 ab230 ab337 b9.5 a9.6 c5.5 a2.3 a
DS1214 a337 a10.4 bc17.8 ab5.2 ab3.2 a240 ab375 a11.0 a13.3 b5.1 ab2.1 a
DS2227 a340 a10.1 bc17.6 ab4.2 ab2.5 ab240 ab363 ab10.8 a13.2 b5.0 ab2.2 a
DL1206 a322 a9.5 cd17.4 ab3.9 b2.3 b210 b357 ab10.2 a13.6 ab5.0 ab2.3 a
DL2217 a319 a9.8 bcd17.9 ab4.3 ab2.4 ab240 ab365 ab9.7 a14.8 a4.8 ab2.1 a
MS1210 a348 a8.6 d18.5 a4.5 ab2.5 ab220 ab360 ab10.2 a13.5 ab4.7 b2.0 a
MS2220 a346 a8.5 d18.2 a4.3 ab2.6 ab250 a357 ab9.8 a13.8 ab4.9 ab2.2 a
NPK242 a326 a10.8 ab16.2 b5.3 a3.0 ab250 a350 ab9.7 a13.4 ab5.3 ab2.2 a
Growing season
Season I153 c205 c14.5 a13.9 c3.2 c1.1 b149 c239 b13.3 a9.1 c4.0 c1.0 c
Season II318 a377 b7.1 c20.4 a4.8 b3.3 a303 a415 a7.5 c19.4 a6.0 a2.5 b
Season III188 b412 a8.3 b18.5 b5.6 a3.5 a251 b420 a9.6 b11.0 b5.1 b3.1 a
Source of variation
Tnsns*nsnsnsnsnsns*nsns
G************
TxGnsns*nsnsnsnsns**nsns
Ø, control; DS1, solid digestate 100 kg N ha−1; DS2, solid digestate 200 kg N ha−1; DL1, liquid digestate 100 kg N ha−1; DL2, liquid digestate 200 kg N ha−1; MS1, solid manure 100 kg N ha−1; MS2, solid manure 200 kg N ha−1; NPK, mineral fertilizer. Values followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. Source of variation (ns, not significant; *, significant at significance level p <0.05; T, fertilization treatments; G, growing season; TxG, interaction between treatments and growing season).
Table 4. Available heavy metal concentration in soil (mg kg−1) as a result of digestates, manure, and mineral fertilizer application.
Table 4. Available heavy metal concentration in soil (mg kg−1) as a result of digestates, manure, and mineral fertilizer application.
Treatment10 Days after Fertilizer Applicationafter Kohlrabi Harvest
Pb Cr Cd Pb Cr Cd
Ø2.280 a0.015 a0.069 a2.099 b0.023 a0.068 a
DS12.101 a0.007 ab0.071 a2.299 ab0.015 ab0.060 ab
DS22.143 a0.009 ab0.062 ab2.313 ab0.004 cde0.048 c
DL12.143 a0.008 ab0.067 ab2.122 b0.003 de0.064 ab
DL22.280 a0.014 a0.067 ab2.255 ab0.013 bc0.067 ab
MS12.105 a0.013 a0.056 bc2.406 a0.012 bcd0.068 a
MS22.247 a0.011 ab0.049 c2.407 a0.003 de0.062 ab
NPK2.113 a0.005 b0.061 ab2.403 a0.001 e0.056 bc
Growing season
Season I1.921 b0.015 a0.044 c2.330 b0.014 a0.058 b
Season II1.919 b0.011 a0.064 b2.014 c0.009 ab0.070 a
Season III2.690 a0.005 b0.080 a2.521 a0.006 b0.056 b
Source of variation
Tnsns****
G******
TxGnsns*ns**
Ø, control; DS1, solid digestate 100 kg N ha−1; DS2, solid digestate 200 kg N ha−1; DL1, liquid digestate 100 kg N ha−1; DL2, liquid digestate 200 kg N ha−1; MS1, solid manure 100 kg N ha−1; MS2, solid manure 200 kg N ha−1; NPK, mineral fertilizer. Values followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. Source of variation (ns, not significant; *, significant at significance level p <0.05; T, fertilization treatments; G, growing season; TxG, interaction between treatments and growing season).
Table 5. Mineral composition (mg kg−1) of enlarged kohlrabi stem (dry matter) as a result of digestates, manure and mineral fertilizer application.
Table 5. Mineral composition (mg kg−1) of enlarged kohlrabi stem (dry matter) as a result of digestates, manure and mineral fertilizer application.
TreatmentFe Mn Cu Zn
Ø170 a19.9 ab6.4 ab20.4 a
DS1152 ab18.1 abc6.6 a20.2 ab
DS2127 bc17.8 abc6.2 ab20.0 abc
DL1168 a20.0 a6.3 ab19.8 abc
DL2132 bc16.0 c6.1 ab17.6 c
MS1109 c16.6 bc6.1 ab18.2 abc
MS2102 c19.5 ab6.2 ab19.1 abc
NPK131 bc19.2 abc5.4 b17.7 bc
Growing season
I season142 b13.3 c9.5 a20.2 a
II season98 c22.4 a4.5 b18.9 ab
III season169 a19.4 b4.5 b18.3 b
Source of variation
T*nsnsns
G***ns
TxGnsns*ns
Ø, Control; DS1, Digestate solid 100 kg N ha−1; DS2, Digestate solid 200 kg N ha−1; DL1, Digestate liquid 100 kg N ha−1; DL2, Digestate liquid 200 kg N ha−1; MS1, Manure solid 100 kg N ha−1; MS2, Manure solid 200 kg N ha−1; NPK, mineral fertilizer. Values followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. Source of variation (ns, not significant; *, significant at significance level p <0.05; T, fertilization treatments; G, growing season; TxG, interaction between treatments and growing season).
Table 6. Mineral composition (mg kg−1) of kohlrabi leaves (dry matter) as a result of digestates, manure and mineral fertilizer application.
Table 6. Mineral composition (mg kg−1) of kohlrabi leaves (dry matter) as a result of digestates, manure and mineral fertilizer application.
TreatmentFe Mn Cu Zn
Ø735 ab86 ab9.2 c26 ab
DS1747 ab86 ab9.9 bc27 ab
DS2652 bc87 ab13.9 a34 a
DL1733 ab83 bc11.2 abc29 ab
DL2854 a93 a12.3 ab29 ab
MS1756 ab89 ab11.3 abc30 ab
MS2696 abc88 ab10.3 bc26 ab
NPK536 c75 c10.8 abc24 b
Growing season
I season1055 a69 c12.1 b39 a
II season517 b108 a15.1 a22 b
III season568 b82 b6.2 c24 b
Source of variation
Tns*nsns
G****
TxGnsnsnsns
Ø, Control; DS1, Digestate solid 100 kg N ha−1; DS2, Digestate solid 200 kg N ha−1; DL1, Digestate liquid 100 kg N ha−1; DL2, Digestate liquid 200 kg N ha−1; MS1, Manure solid 100 kg N ha−1; MS2, Manure solid 200 kg N ha−1; NPK, mineral fertilizer. Values followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. Source of variation (ns, not significant; *, significant at significance level p <0.05; T, fertilization treatments; G, growing season; TxG, interaction between treatments and growing season).
Table 7. Heavy metals (mg kg−1) in enlarged kohlrabi stems and leaves (dry matter) as a result of digestates, manure, and mineral fertilizer application.
Table 7. Heavy metals (mg kg−1) in enlarged kohlrabi stems and leaves (dry matter) as a result of digestates, manure, and mineral fertilizer application.
TreatmentStemLeaves
Pb Cr Cd Pb Cr Cd
Ø0.193 bc1.870 ab0.079 a0.094 c2.351 a0.049 a
DS10.114 c1.857 ab0.032 bc0.094 c1.945 ab0.035 a
DS20.147 bc1.521 b0.023 c0.159 ab1.728 b0.068 a
DL10.157 bc1.835 ab0.061 ab0.105 bc1.796 b0.051 a
DL20.304 a2.083 a0.087 a0.106 bc1.925 ab0.061 a
MS10.288 a2.147 a0.071 a0.157 abc1.841 b0.042 a
MS20.282 a2.051 ab0.027 bc0.122 bc1.615 b0.045 a
NPK0.220 ab1.521 b0.057 abc0.206 a1.969 ab0.039 a
Growing season
Season I0.325 a1.250 c0.050 b0.077 b1.244 b0.058 a
Season II0.180 b1.807 b0.031 b0.162 a2.139 a0.052 ab
Season III0.134 b2.526 a0.083 a0.152 a2.305 a0.036 b
Source of variation
T*ns**nsns
G*****ns
TxG*ns****
Ø, control; DS1, solid digestate 100 kg N ha−1; DS2, solid digestate 200 kg N ha−1; DL1, liquid digestate 100 kg N ha−1; DL2, liquid digestate200 kg N ha−1; MS1, solid manure 100 kg N ha−1; MS2, solid manure 200 kg N ha−1; NPK, mineral fertilizer. Values followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. Source of variation (ns, not significant; *, significant at significance level p <0.05; T, fertilization treatments; G, growing season; TxG, interaction between treatments and growing season). In the experiment, average dry matter content of enlarged stems was 14.47% and average dry matter content of leaves was 14.77% (based on the dry matter content of 10 separate enlarged kohlrabi stems and leaves).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kovačević, D.; Manojlović, M.; Čabilovski, R.; Ilić, Z.S.; Petković, K.; Štrbac, M.; Vijuk, M. Digestate and Manure Use in Kohlrabi Production: Impact on Plant-Available Nutrients and Heavy Metals in Soil, Yield, and Mineral Composition. Agronomy 2022, 12, 871. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040871

AMA Style

Kovačević D, Manojlović M, Čabilovski R, Ilić ZS, Petković K, Štrbac M, Vijuk M. Digestate and Manure Use in Kohlrabi Production: Impact on Plant-Available Nutrients and Heavy Metals in Soil, Yield, and Mineral Composition. Agronomy. 2022; 12(4):871. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040871

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kovačević, Dragan, Maja Manojlović, Ranko Čabilovski, Zoran S. Ilić, Klara Petković, Mirna Štrbac, and Mirjana Vijuk. 2022. "Digestate and Manure Use in Kohlrabi Production: Impact on Plant-Available Nutrients and Heavy Metals in Soil, Yield, and Mineral Composition" Agronomy 12, no. 4: 871. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040871

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop