Next Article in Journal
Effects of Cover Crops and Drip Fertigation Regime in a Young Almond Agroecosystem
Next Article in Special Issue
Future Emission Scenario Effects on Melon Cultivars (Cucumis melo L.) in the Brazilian Semi-Arid Region
Previous Article in Journal
Responses of the Lodging Resistance of Indica Rice Cultivars to Temperature and Solar Radiation under Field Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Decisive Climatic Factors for Production of Bioactive Saponarin-Rich Barley Sprouts: A Study of Seasonal Effect
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

The Influence of Variety and Climatic Year on the Phenology of Blueberry Grown in the Banat Area, Romania

by
Sina Cosmulescu
1,*,
Maria Marina Merca Laies
2 and
Veronica Sărățeanu
3
1
Department of Horticulture and Food Science, Faculty of Horticulture, University of Craiova, 13 A.I. Cuza Street, 200585 Craiova, Romania
2
Doctoral School of Plant and Animal Resources Engineering, Faculty of Horticulture, University of Craiova, 13 A.I. Cuza Street, 200585 Craiova, Romania
3
Department of Agricultural Technologies, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Life Sciences “King Michael I of Romania” from Timişoara, Calea Aradului Street, no. 119, 300645 Timișoara, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(11), 2605; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112605
Submission received: 9 October 2022 / Revised: 17 October 2022 / Accepted: 20 October 2022 / Published: 23 October 2022

Abstract

:
This paper’s aim was to investigate the influence of variety and the climatic year on vegetation phenophases in blueberries grown in southwest Romania, the Banat region. This study was carried out during the growing season of 2020–2022 in a blueberry plantation, for ‘Duke’, ‘Hannah’s Choice’ and ‘Elliott’ varieties. In the study, phenological traits were recorded using the BBCH phenological scale and the observation of phenotypic data was recorded as in Julian days. Thus, it is found that the duration of each phenophase characterized each variety. The calendar periods for the onset of vegetation and the duration of spring phenological development stages in varieties have differed from year to year and depended on weather conditions. In the case of the phenological stage, depending on variety, the maximum amplitude was recorded for BBCH 87 stage (75% blue fruits) of 51 days, and the minimum amplitude, of 25 days, for BBCH 51 stage (bud swell) and BBCH 59 (late pink bud). The coefficient of variation, depending on climatic year, for generative phenophases, had values between 6.5% (BBCH 67-petal fall) and 21.1% (BBCH 51-bud swell). It was found that the variety and the climatic year influence the development of vegetation phenophases. The results indicate that blueberry cultivars have demonstrated a high degree of phenotypic plasticity to respond to gradual changes in environmental conditions and are important for the evaluation of cultivar cultivation prospects in the studied area.

1. Introduction

A major aspect in assuring successful blueberry cultivation and good productivity is the knowledge of the cycle of growth and fruiting and of the biology of the plant and how it adapts to the environmental conditions existing in different cultivation regions, with influence on the total income. Considering these aspects, it is important to monitor and forecast plant phenology. Additionally, considering that blueberry varieties are partially self-sterile, it is important to find varieties that bloom simultaneously in the same plantation, in order to obtain cross-pollination that leads to the binding of a large number of fruits and implicitly to a large increase in crops [1]. This aspect is one of the most important reasons for knowing the phenology of each variety cultivated in each plantation. Abiotic factors, especially temperature and humidity, do influence the date on which different phenophases appear and their duration, for example: bud swelling (bursting), flowering, fruit ripening and leaf fall [2,3,4]. Monitoring these environmental factors can be particularly important for farmers who want to introduce management practices at various stages of crop development. Diez-Rodriguez et al. [5] consider that the knowledge of the entomofauna associated with the blueberry, together with the similarity of composition with the phenological stages and the evaluated sites, contributes to the development of integrated pest management and the establishment of a crop production system. Additionally, for studying the impact of climate change on plants, researchers have used phenology as a particularly important tool, especially in troubled ecosystems [6]. The variations that appear from one year to another in the occurrence and duration of phenological stages can be used as a biological indicator in the ecology of various species, as their response to the climatic variations that occur [7]. Blueberry culture is of increasing interest, due to the nutritional qualities of fruits and the therapeutic virtues of both fruits and leaves [8,9,10]. In general, the characteristics of a cultivar are defined by the environmental conditions in which it was obtained, but which may be quite different from those of the production area [11]. Taking into account the fact that the global environment is changing, with higher global temperature and extreme precipitation fluctuations, it is very important for farmers to know the adaptation of genotypes to different crop areas [12,13,14,15,16], as it is known that environmental factors require different development of vegetation phenophases [7,17,18]. The study of growth and development patterns of blueberry cultivars introduced under new environmental conditions is of great importance for evaluating their prospects because the rate of plant development has changed as a result of the spread of each species in different climatic and ecological conditions. Data on newly introduced blueberry cultivars for Central and Eastern Europe are fragmented and adapted to different climatic conditions [19,20] which differ significantly from the meteorological and climatic conditions in Romania. In many growing areas, blueberries are affected by late hoar frost and spring frosts. Thus, a means of reducing crop losses caused by frost damage would have an immediate economic impact, and as a result, studies are needed on the development of spring phenophases. The identification of cultivars adapted to the different cultivation areas in Romania will also trigger the expansion of blueberry cultivation. The objective of this was to evaluate the influence of the variety and the climatic year on the spring-summer phenophases of blueberries grown in southwestern Romania, the Banat region.

2. Materials and Methods

Experimental site and plant material. The experiment was organized in Gherteniş town (45°25′48″ N 21°34′55″ E), Caraş-Severin County, Banat region, located in the southwest of Romania, in a plantation established in 2015 (Figure 1). The culture system is super intensive, and the density is 4700 bushes per surface unit. The planting was done on bins covered with black agrotextile-type foil, and the planting distance is 3 × 0.7 m. Due to its location in the southwestern part of Romania, not far from the Adriatic Sea and sheltered by the Carpathians, the Caraș-Severin area has a moderate temperate-continental climate, with sub-Mediterranean nuances. During the research period, in the experimental plantation, the average annual temperature was 12.3 °C, while the average temperature in July was 22.5 °C, and in January it was 0.9 °C; the sum of annual rainfall was 828 mm. The soil has a medium clay-clay texture, with a clay content between 35–45% and a humus content between 2.3–2.7%.
The study was carried out over the period 2020–2022 on ‘Duke’, ‘Hannah’s Choice’ and ‘Elliott’ varieties.
Methods. The phenology of varieties was monitored according to BBCH (Biologische Bundesanstalt, Bundessortenamt und CHemosche Industrie) scale, according to those described by Longstroth [21]. For the experiment, 30 shrubs were marked, in three repetitions for each variety. The following phenological stages were monitored (Figure 2): 51/bud swell, 57/early pink bud, 59/late pink bud, 61/early bloom, 67/petal fall, 71/early green fruit, 81/fruit colouring, 83/10% blue fruits, 87/75% blue fruits. Observation of phenotypic data was recorded as the number of days since 1 January (Julian day) for statistical analyses.
Statistical analysis. Analysis of variance ANOVA (SINGLE FACTOR ANOVA) was used to analyse within-group and between-group variance and the grand mean (overall mean). The JASP 0.15.3 and Excel 2019 programs were used. With the JASP 0.15.3 program, descriptive analyses of the data and analysis of variance ANOVA were carried out, and to determine the significance of the results, the post hoc P Tukey analysis was used. Bravais-Pearson correlations were performed with Excel 2019.

3. Results and Discussion

BBCH phenophases were characterized in terms of the number of days from 1 January of each experimental year and for each blueberry variety analysed separately (Julian days). In the present paper, a descriptive statistical analysis of the blueberry generative phenophases was carried out regarding the influence of variety (Table 1) and the climatic year (Table 2) on blueberry generative phenophases cultivated in the low hilly area of Banat during 2020–2022. It can be seen that, according to the minimum number of days required for the development of phenophases, for all the nine analysed phenological stages, the ‘Elliot’ variety was the latest in the assortment, followed by ‘Duke’ and ‘Hanna’s Choice’, which highlights the influence of variety on the development of phenophases. The flowering phenology has shown that the varieties studied are different in regard to the start of vegetation, flowering moments and ripening of fruits [22]. Additionally, Kirk & Isaacs [23] suggest that flowering phenology of highbush blueberries differs significantly by variety and is predictable based on air temperature. In the case of the phenological stage, depending on variety, the maximum amplitude was recorded for BBCH 87 stage (75% blue fruits) of 51 days, and the minimum amplitude, of 25 days, for BBCH 51 stage (bud swell) and BBCH 59 (late pink bud). From the analysis of maximum and minimum phenophase development data, it appears that the first phenophases (BBCH 51-BBCH 67) unfold much more grouped (the amplitude depending on variety is between 25 and 31 days), while for the late phenophases, the amplitude was much longer, between 44 and 51 days.
The coefficient of variation, for the studied generative phenophases, had values below 15%, highlighting the stability of conditions of growth and development. It can be considered that blueberry population in the study is homogeneous, the phenological stages are quite grouped in the analysed variety, only for the BBCH 51 stage, in the ‘Hannah’s Choice’ variety, the values were higher (14.9%) (Table 1). It is found that the duration of each phenophase has characterized each variety. Thus, the results obtained in the field trials indicate that the length of the period from the bud swells (BBCH 51) to 75 blue (BBCH 87) of highbush blueberry varied from 180.6 to 222.3 Julian days (Table 1). In the case of the study carried out, the earliest phenophases were recorded in the ‘Hannah’s Choice’ variety, especially for the early phenophases (BBCH 51–81), so that the colouration of fruits started earlier in the ‘Duke’ variety (BBCH 83–87). The beginning of flowering is a very important parameter because of the possible damage to flowers by late spring frost [24], and the duration of phenological stages was influenced by the microclimate [25].
The beginning of flowering (BBCH 61) occurred at 103.6 Julian days for the ‘Hannah’s Choice’ variety, and 123.6 Julian days for the ‘Elliott’ variety. The difference between the beginning of the vegetation period and the start of flowering was from 59 to 61.6 days. The flowering period (BBCH 61–67) occurred at 103.6–121.3 Julian days. The beginning of fruit ripening (BBCH 83) started on the 47th day after the beginning of flowering for the ‘Duke’ variety, and on the 69th day for the ‘Elliott’ variety. A duration of 41–51 days between the beginning of flowering and the beginning of fruit ripening was found by Sterne and Liepniece [24] in some highbush blueberry cultivars in Latvia. The time of fruit ripening (BBCH 81–87) fluctuated from 147.3 to 222.3 Julian days; the longest fruit ripening period was observed in the ‘Elliott’ variety at 44 days.
A longer duration, 56–66 days, was found by Sterne and Liepniece [24] between the phenophase beginning of fruit ripening and full ripeness in ‘Jersey’ and ‘Bluecrop’ cultivars. Based on the Shapiro–Wilk test, it can be seen that, in general, the distribution of data regarding the generative phenophases is normal with a few exceptions, namely the phenophase BBCH 67 (petal fall) in the ‘Elliot’ variety and BBCH 87 (75% blue) in the ‘Duke’ variety (Shapiro–Wilk p-value < 0.001).
Regarding the influence of climatic year on the development of generative phenophases in the blueberries cultivated in the low hilly area of Banat, the results are presented in Table 2. It is found that the calendar periods for the beginning of vegetation and the duration of spring phenological development stages in the cultivars differ considerably from year to year and depend on weather conditions, a fact also supported by Sava et al. [26]. Additionally, Valdés et al. [27], in his study, shows that the phenology of flowering and fruiting was rather variable and clearly depends on temperature variations throughout the year. The relative values of bloom parameters determined here will also help managers plan their plantings of varieties that require crosspollination with compatible varieties. The flowering season, associated with chilling requirements, and harvesting season are important traits for the adaptation of the cultivars to different environments [12]. The coefficient of variation, depending on climatic year, for generative phenophases, had values between 6.5% (BBCH 67-petal fall, 2021) and 21.1% (BBCH 51-bud swell, 2021). In the case of the study carried out, in 2021, the earliest BBCH 51 phenophase was recorded, on average 50 days from 1 January. Depending on the evolution of environmental factors, the following phenophases unfolded differently, so that the earliness of 2021, from the BBCH 51 phenophase, was not preserved in the following phenophases. For fruit ripening, BBCH 81–87 phenophases occurred earlier in 2020, followed by 2021 and 2022 (Table 2): BBCH 81 (fruit colouring) at 151–192 Julian days; BBCH 83 (10% blue) at 166.3–175.6 Julian days; BBCH 87 (75% blue) at 192–200.3 Julian days. It was found that blueberry varieties demonstrated a high degree of phenotypic plasticity from one year to another. The conclusions are similar to those obtained by Drozd [28], who says that the rhythmic plasticity of blueberry varieties introduced in Belarus appeared in the ability to change the phenomenon due to different weather conditions during the years of observation and was reflected in the variation of the dates of the onset of the main phenological phases. Paulouski [29] considers that cultivation differences in blueberry development manifest themselves more vividly during the flowering period and especially during the fruit ripening stage. Regarding the influence of experimental year on generative phenophases of blueberries grown in the low hilly area of Banat, the distribution of data analysed from a statistical point of view is normal, with one exception, namely the BBCH 71 phenophase (early green fruit) in 2022, when the Shapiro–Wilk p-value < 0.001.
To determine whether the number of days required for each generative phenophase influences the duration of subsequent phenophases, Bravais-Pearson correlation coefficients (r calc) were calculated (Table 3).
The obtained results are presented in the matrix of correlations between BBCH generative phenophases in blueberries cultivated in the low hilly area of Banat. As can be seen from Table 3, all the phenophases correlate with each other, and in most cases, the distinctly significant correlations were calculated (r value ranged from 0.67 to 0.78) and, respectively, very significantly positive (r value ranged from 0.81 to 0.98). Regarding correlations, Baptista et al. [30] found that the flowering period was highly correlated with the number of days to floral budbreak (r value ranged from 0.94 to 0.84), but not with floral budbreak-to-flowering interval. In other research, it has been observed that flowering time significantly correlates with harvest time in highbush blueberries [31,32]. In conclusion, we can state that these positive correlations obtained have highlighted the fact that with the increase in the number of days required for an early generative phenophase, there is generally an increase in the number of days required to reach the later phenophases in blueberries cultivated in the low hilly area of Banat.
ANOVA analysis was performed comparing between varieties and between years (Table 4 and Table 5). It appears that the number of days required for the various phenophases is generally different between the cultivars compared, so it can be stated that they are genetically determined and differ by cultivar. This statement is supported by the statistical significance determined for each of the phenophases analysed, because in each of them there are significant differences between at least two of the three varieties compared to each other (Table 4). However, in the case of comparing the three experimental years, the identified situation is diametrically opposed. Thus, very high significance thresholds were obtained, which shows us that there are no significant differences between climatic years in any of the analysed blueberry phenophases (Table 5).
From a practical point of view, these results can also be used in the zoning of blueberry varieties according to climatic characteristics, since climate change affects blueberry culture [33,34,35]. For example, the fewer the days the early generative phenophases need to manifest, the shorter the time to obtain the first blueberry harvest, and vice versa, i.e., if the first generative phenophases require a higher number of days, it is possible that the formation of actual fruit production will be delayed, this being susceptible to being affected, for example, by high temperatures in summer [36].

4. Conclusions

It was found that the variety and the climatic year do influence the development of vegetation phenophases. The differences in phenology recorded between varieties are caused by different accumulation of the amount of temperature necessary for the development of a certain phenophase and in correlation with the requirements of variety. The results indicate that blueberry varieties demonstrated a high degree of phenotypic plasticity to respond to gradual changes in environmental conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.C.; methodology, V.S. and M.M.M.L.; software, V.S.; investigation, M.M.M.L.; resources, M.M.M.L.; writing—original draft preparation, S.C.; writing—review and editing, S.C.; supervision, S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kendall, L.K.; Gagic, V.; Evans, L.J.; Cutting, B.T.; Scalzo, J.; Hanusch, Y.; Rader, R. Self-compatible blueberry cultivars require fewer floral visits to maximize fruit production than a partially self-incompatible cultivar. J. Appl. Ecol. 2020, 57, 2454–2462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Beaubien, E.; Johnson, D. Flowering plant phenology and weather in Alberta, Canada. Int. J. Biometeorol. 1994, 38, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Schaber, J.; Bradeck, F. Evaluation of methods for the combination of phenological time series and outlier detection. Tree Physiol. 2002, 22, 973–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Cosmulescu, S.; Calusaru, F.G. Influence of temperature on blackthorn (Prunus spinosa L.) phenophases in spring season. J. Agric. Meteorol. 2020, 76, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Diez-Rodriguez, G.I.; Sosinski, E.E.; Hübner, L.K.; Antunes, L.E.; Nava, D.E. Entomofauna associated to different phenological stages on blueberry crop. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 2017, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Denny, E.; Gerst, K.; Miller-Rushing, A.; Tierney, G.; Crimmins, T.; Enquist, C.; Weltzin, J. Standardized phenology monitoring methods to track plant and animal activity for science and resource management application. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2014, 58, 591–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Cosmulescu, S.; Ionescu, M.B. Phenological calendar in some walnut genotypes grown in Romania and its correlations with air temperature. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2018, 62, 2007–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Moze, S.; Polak, T.; Gasperlin, L.; Koron, D.; Vanzo, A.; Poklar Ulrih, N.; Abram, V. Phenolics in Slovenian bilberries (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) and blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 6998–7004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tundis, R.; Tenuta, M.C.; Loizzo, M.R.; Bonesi, M.; Finetti, F.; Trabalzini, L.; Deguin, B. Vaccinium species (Ericaceae): From chemical composition to bio-functional activities. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cera-Campos, J.I.; Jacobo-Cuellar, J.L.; Rodriguez-Roque, M.J.; Parra-Quezada, R.A.; Soto-Caballero, M.C.; Perez-Leal, R.; Oscar, C.A. Vegetative growth and quality of blueberry fruit cultivated in Chihuahua, Mexico. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. 2019, 47, 450–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Frias-Moreno, M.N.; Olivas-Orozco, G.I.; Gonzalez-Aguilar, G.A.; Benitez-Enriquez, Y.E.; Paredes-Alonso, A.; Jacobo-Cuellar, J.L.; Parra-Quezada, R.A. Yield, quality and phytochemicals of organic and conventional raspberry cultivated in Chihuahua, Mexico. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. 2019, 47, 522–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Campa, A.; Ferreira, J.J. Genetic diversity assessed by genotyping by sequencing (GBS) and for phenological traits in blueberry cultivars. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0206361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Merca (Laies), M.M.; Cosmulescu, S.N. The diversity of some phenological features in blueberry cultivars (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) grown in Banat area, Romania. Sci. Pap. Ser. B Hortic. 2022. accepted. [Google Scholar]
  14. Leposavić, A.; Jevremović, D.; Popović, B.; Mitrović, O.; Ðurović, D.; Keserović, Z. Phenological properties of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) cultivars grown in Western Serbia. Voćarstvo 2017, 51, 21–29. [Google Scholar]
  15. Medeiros, J.G.; Biasi, L.A.; Bona, C.M.D.; Cuquel, F.L. Phenology, production and quality of blueberry produced in humid subtropical climate. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 2018, 40, e-520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Caterenciuc, C.; Sava, P. Phenological research in the development of blueberry plants in the republic of Moldova. Fruit Grow. Res. 2018, XXXIV, 14–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cosmulescu, S.; Ștefănescu, D.; Stoenescu, A.M. Variability of phenological behaviours of wild fruit tree species based on discriminant analysis. Plants 2022, 11, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Asănică, A.; Popescu, D.; Stănică, F.; Temocico, G. First year reaction of some early highbush blueberry varieties grown in containers to organic fertilizers and pest control. Sci. Pap. Ser. B Hortic. 2020, 64, 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  19. Atroshchenko, G.P.; Shcherbakova, G.V.; Koshman, M.E. Economic and biological assessment of tall blueberry varieties in the conditions of the Leningrad region Sovrem. Gardening 2016, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  20. Shlapak, V.P. Peculiarities of the passage of phenological phases of introduced varieties in tall blackberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) in the minds of the right-bank forest-steppe of Ukraine. Navuk. Pratsi Lisivnichoy Acad. Sci. Ukr. 2013, VI. 11–S, 93–96. [Google Scholar]
  21. Longstroth, M. Michigan Blueberries. Fruit Growth Stages References—Blueberries. 2008. Available online: https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/annual-growth-cycle-of-northern-highbush-blueberry (accessed on 18 May 2022).
  22. Kotrotsios, I.; Slav, M.; Hoza, D. Preliminary study in regards to the culture of blueberry in containers. Sci. Pap. Ser. Hortic. 2017, 60, 163–167. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kirk, A.K.; Isaacs, R. Predicting flower phenology and viability of highbush blueberry. HortScience 2012, 47, 1291–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Sterne, D.; Liepniece, M. Preliminary observations of phenology development, yield and yield quality of some highbush blueberry cultivars in Latvia. In International Scientific Confer; University of Agriculture: Jelgava, Latvia, 2010; p. 60. [Google Scholar]
  25. Steyn, J.; Lötze, E.; Hoffman, E.W. The seasonal progression of the reproductive phenology of two southern highbush blueberry (V. corymbosum L. interspecific hybrids) cultivars in the Western Cape, South Africa. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 307, 111493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sava, P.; Caterenciuc, C. Study on the adaptability of some blueberry cultivars in the Republic of Moldova. Rom. J. Horticult. 2021, 79, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Valdés, B.; Parra, R.; Diaz Lifante, Z. Blueberry selection in SW Spain. Acta Hortic. 2006, 715, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Drozd, O.V. Seasonal rhythm of growth and development of new cultivars of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) introduced into the Belarusian Polesie. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Belarus Biol. Ser. 2018, 63, 472–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Paulouski, M.B. Phenological development of highbush blueberry various cultivars in Belarus. Вoстoчнo-еврoпейский научный журнал 2017, 1-1, 12–22. [Google Scholar]
  30. Baptista, M.C.; Oliveira, P.B.; Lopes da Fonseca, L.; Oliveira, C.M. Early ripening of southern highbush blueberries under mild winter conditions. Acta Hortic. 2006, 715, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Galletta, G.J.; Ballington, J.R. Blueberries, cranberries, and lingonberries. In Fruit Breeding Volume II Vine and Small Fruits; Janick, J., Moore, J.N., Eds.; John Willey& Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1996; pp. 1–65. [Google Scholar]
  32. Nagasaka, K.; Yamane, H.; Tao, R. Evaluation of the effects of pollination on fruit size and quality of highbush blueberry. Acta Hortic. 2021, 1312, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bădescu, A.; Asănică, A.; Stănică, F.; Bădescu, C.; Ungurenuș, M. Climate change affects blueberry production in Romania. Acta Hortic. 2017, 1180, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tasnim, R.; Drummond, F.; Zhang, Y.J. Climate change patterns of wild blueberry fields in Downeast, Maine over the past 40 years. Water 2021, 13, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Barai, K.; Tasnim, R.; Hall, B.; Rahimzadeh-Bajgiran, P.; Zhang, Y.J. Is drought increasing in Maine and hurting wild blueberry production? Climate 2021, 9, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, F.H.; Bryla, D.R.; Strik, B.C. Critical temperatures and heating times for fruit damage in northern highbush blueberry. HortScience 2019, 54, 2231–2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Experimental site (Gherteniş town; 45°25′48″ N 21°34′55″ E, Caraş-Severin County).
Figure 1. Experimental site (Gherteniş town; 45°25′48″ N 21°34′55″ E, Caraş-Severin County).
Agronomy 12 02605 g001
Figure 2. Stages of generative development in blueberry (original).
Figure 2. Stages of generative development in blueberry (original).
Agronomy 12 02605 g002
Table 1. Descriptive statistics regarding the influence of variety on generative phenophases of blueberries grown in the low hilly area of Banat (2020–2022).
Table 1. Descriptive statistics regarding the influence of variety on generative phenophases of blueberries grown in the low hilly area of Banat (2020–2022).
PhenophaseVarietyMeanSDCV (%)Shapiro–Wilkp-Value MinimumMaximum
BBCH 51 (Bud swell)‘Duke’52.03.666.90.9420.5374956
‘Elliott’62.02.003.21.0001.0006064
‘Hannah’s Choice’44.66.6514.90.9530.5833952
BBCH 57 (Early pink bud)‘Duke’99.32.082.10.9230.46397101
‘Elliott’111.35.504.90.9970.900106117
‘Hannah’s Choice’85.34.725.50.9070.4078089
BBCH 59 (Late pink bud)‘Duke’106.64.934.60.8320.194101110
‘Elliott’118.02.642.20.8930.363116121
‘Hannah’s Choice’97.61.521.60.9640.6379699
BBCH 61 (Early bloom)‘Duke’113.05.294.70.8930.363107117
‘Elliott’123.63.783.10.8550.253121128
‘Hannah’s Choice’103.65.135.00.9490.56798108
BBCH 67 (Petal fall)‘Duke’127.006.084.80.8180.157120131
‘Elliott’142.34.042.80.750<0.001140147
‘Hannah’s Choice’121.34.723.90.9070.407116125
BBCH 71 (Early green fruit)‘Duke’133.36.424.80.8710.298126138
‘Elliott’155.310.406.70.9230.463147167
‘Hannah’s Choice’128.66.685.20.9530.583123136
BBCH 81 (Fruit colouring)‘Duke’155.08.715.60.8420.220145161
‘Elliott’178.09.845.50.9300.490167186
‘Hannah’s Choice’147.311.848.00.7860.081140161
BBCH 83 (10% Blue)‘Duke’160.38.085.00.750<0.001151165
‘Elliott’192.61.520.80.9640.637191194
‘Hannah’s Choice’162.65.503.40.9970.900157168
BBCH 87 (75% Blue)‘Duke’180.64.502.50.9960.878176185
‘Elliott’222.34.502.00.9960.878218227
‘Hannah’s Choice’182.36.503.60.9980.915176189
SD = standard deviation; CV = coefficient of variation.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics regarding the influence of experimental year on generative phenophases of blueberry cultivated in the low hilly area of Banat (2020–2022).
Table 2. Descriptive statistics regarding the influence of experimental year on generative phenophases of blueberry cultivated in the low hilly area of Banat (2020–2022).
PhenophaseYearMeanSDCV (%)Shapiro–Wilkp-Value MinimumMaximum
BBCH 51 (Bud swell)202056.65.038.90.9870.7805262
202150.010.5321.10.9930.8433960
202252.010.8120.80.9420.5374364
BBCH 57 (Early pink bud)202096.015.5216.20.9970.89380111
2021101.315.0414.80.9940.85387117
202298.68.738.90.9470.55489106
BBCH 59 (Late pink bud)2020104.610.9710.50.9160.43996117
2021109.611.0110.00.9970.90099121
2022108.09.168.50.9640.63798116
BBCH 61 (Early bloom)2020109.012.1211.10.9800.72698122
2021117.010.148.70.9710.672108128
2022114.38.327.30.9230.463105121
BBCH 67 (Petal fall)2020125.312.8510.30.8710.298116140
2021131.38.506.50.9990.935123140
2022134.011.538.60.9100.417125147
BBCH 71 (Early green fruit)2020132.013.079.90.8420.220123147
2021139.012.539.00.9950.868127152
2022146.317.8912.20.750<0.001136167
BBCH 81 (Fruit colouring)2020151.014.009.30.8620.274141167
2021160.620.5012.81.0000.973140181
2022168.615.048.90.8050.127159186
BBCH 83 (10% Blue)2020166.321.5713.00.8600.266151191
2021173.616.779.70.8000.114163193
2022175.615.949.10.8270.180165194
BBCH 87 (75% Blue)2020192.022.7111.80.8550.253176218
2021193.025.2313.10.8300.189176222
2022200.323.1811.60.8210.165185227
Table 3. Matrix of correlations between BBCH generative phenophases in blueberries cultivated in the low hilly area of Banat.
Table 3. Matrix of correlations between BBCH generative phenophases in blueberries cultivated in the low hilly area of Banat.
BBCH515759616771818387
5110.72 **0.74 **0.62 *0.68 **0.69 **0.67 **0.65 *0.77 **
57 10.96 ***0.97 ***0.85 ***0.76 **0.81 ***0.78 **0.77 **
59 10.98 ***0.92 ***0.84 ***0.86 ***0.86 ***0.84 ***
61 10.91 ***0.81 ***0.83 ***0.83 ***0.78 **
67 10.97 ***0.94 ***0.94 ***0.90 ***
71 10.97 ***0.92 ***0.82 ***
81 10.89 ***0.90 ***
83 10.97 ***
Pearson r calc value; df = 7 (two-tailed test); α = 0.05; n = 9; df = n − 2 two-tailed; p 0.1 = 0.582 *; p 0.05 = 0.666 **; p 0.01 = 0.798 ***.
Table 4. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) on phenology under cultivar influence.
Table 4. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) on phenology under cultivar influence.
PhenophaseCompared VarietiesMean DifferenceSEtptukey
BBCH 51 (Bud swell)‘Duke’‘Elliott’−10.0003.692−2.7090.078
‘Hannah’s Choice’7.3333.6921.9860.196
‘Elliott’‘Hannah’s Choice’17.3333.6924.6950.008 **
BBCH 57 (Early pink bud)‘Duke’‘Elliott’−12.0003.559−3.3720.035 *
‘Hannah’s Choice’14.0003.5593.9340.018 *
‘Elliott’‘Hannah’s Choice’26.0003.5597.305<0.001 ***
BBCH 59 (Late pink bud)‘Duke’‘Elliott’−11.3332.735−4.1430.014 *
‘Hannah’s Choice’9.0002.7353.2900.038 *
‘Elliott’‘Hannah’s Choice’20.3332.7357.434<0.001 ***
BBCH 61 (Early bloom)‘Duke’‘Elliott’−10.6673.906−2.7310.076
‘Hannah’s Choice’9.3333.9062.3890.118
‘Elliott’‘Hannah’s Choice’20.0003.9065.1200.005 **
BBCH 67 (Petal fall)‘Duke’‘Elliott’−15.3334.101−3.7390.022 *
‘Hannah’s Choice’5.6674.1011.3820.407
‘Elliott’‘Hannah’s Choice’21.0004.1015.1210.005 **
BBCH 71 (Early green fruit)‘Duke’‘Elliott’−22.0006.566−3.3510.035 *
‘Hannah’s Choice’4.6676.5660.7110.766
‘Elliott’‘Hannah’s Choice’26.6676.5664.0610.016 *
BBCH 81 (Fruit colouring)‘Duke’‘Elliott’−23.0008.344−2.7560.074
‘Hannah’s Choice’7.6678.3440.9190.649
‘Elliott’‘Hannah’s Choice’30.6678.3443.6750.024 *
BBCH 83 (10% Blue)‘Duke’‘Elliott’−32.3334.667−6.9290.001 **
‘Hannah’s Choice’−2.3334.667−0.5000.874
‘Elliott’‘Hannah’s Choice’30.0004.6676.4290.002 **
BBCH 87 (75% Blue)‘Duke’‘Elliott’−41.6674.295−9.702<0.001 ***
‘Hannah’s Choice’−1.6674.295−0.3880.921
‘Elliott’‘Hannah’s Choice’40.0004.2959.314<0.001 ***
Note. p-value adjusted for comparing a family of 3; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Table 5. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) on phenology under the influence of year.
Table 5. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) on phenology under the influence of year.
PhenophaseCompared YearsMean DifferenceSEtptukey
BBCH 51 (Bud swell)202020216.6677.5030.8890.667
20224.6677.5030.6220.814
20212022−2.0007.503−0.2670.962
BBCH 57 (Early pink bud)20202021−5.33310.992−0.4850.881
2022−2.66710.992−0.2430.968
202120222.66710.9920.2430.968
BBCH 59 (Late pink bud)20202021−5.0008.507−0.5880.832
2022−3.3338.507−0.3920.920
202120221.6678.5070.1960.979
BBCH 61 (Early bloom)20202021−8.0008.424−0.9500.632
2022−5.3338.424−0.6330.808
202120222.6678.4240.3170.947
BBCH 67 (Petal fall)20202021−6.0009.076−0.6610.793
2022−8.6679.076−0.9550.629
20212022−2.6679.076−0.2940.954
BBCH 71 (Early green fruit)20202021−7.00012.003−0.5830.834
2022−14.33312.003−1.1940.498
20212022−7.33312.003−0.6110.820
BBCH 81 (Fruit colouring)20202021−9.66713.684−0.7060.769
2022−17.66713.684−1.2910.450
20212022−8.00013.684−0.5850.833
BBCH 83 (10% Blue)20202021−7.33314.915−0.4920.878
2022−9.33314.915−0.6260.812
20212022−2.00014.915−0.1340.990
BBCH 87 (75% Blue)20202021−1.00019.381−0.0520.999
2022−8.33319.381−0.4300.905
20212022−7.33319.381−0.3780.925
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cosmulescu, S.; Laies, M.M.M.; Sărățeanu, V. The Influence of Variety and Climatic Year on the Phenology of Blueberry Grown in the Banat Area, Romania. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2605. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112605

AMA Style

Cosmulescu S, Laies MMM, Sărățeanu V. The Influence of Variety and Climatic Year on the Phenology of Blueberry Grown in the Banat Area, Romania. Agronomy. 2022; 12(11):2605. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112605

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cosmulescu, Sina, Maria Marina Merca Laies, and Veronica Sărățeanu. 2022. "The Influence of Variety and Climatic Year on the Phenology of Blueberry Grown in the Banat Area, Romania" Agronomy 12, no. 11: 2605. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112605

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop