Next Article in Journal
Use of Dual-Purpose Winter-Grain Cover Crops as Emergency Forage and for Management of High Soil Phosphorous in Manured Fields
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancement of Clover (Trifolium alexandrinum L.) Shade Tolerance and Nitrogen Fixation under Dense Stands-Based Cropping Systems
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Coupling Relationship and Influencing Factors of the Water–Energy–Cotton System in Tarim River Basin

Agronomy 2022, 12(10), 2333; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102333
by Quan Lu 1,2, Yanxia Yang 1, Bo Li 1, Yanjun Li 2,* and Dezhen Wang 3,4,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Agronomy 2022, 12(10), 2333; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102333
Submission received: 3 August 2022 / Revised: 5 September 2022 / Accepted: 23 September 2022 / Published: 28 September 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Overall, the paper is well written. However, I would suggest authors make minor edits to the English language style. 

Ex: In terms of the influencing factors, the area of soil erosion treatment and water consumption of the ecological environment plays a positive role in promoting the coupling coordination degree, and the number of population...............

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Thanks to the authors for preparing the manuscript on a very important and interesting topic.

The study of factors affecting agriculture, to increase the productivity and productivity of agricultural products in a situation of food and energy crises is very important in scientific and practical aspects. And the manuscript deserves support.

However, there are several comments that authors need to address before publishing the manuscript.

1. It is necessary to clearly formulate research hypotheses. What do you want to prove in your research? The authors need to explain in details the major contribution of this research.

2. It is necessary to supplement the literature review with foreign studies on this topic. A fairly effective way to coordinate the use of various factors in agriculture is the cluster form. The cluster is also a form of networking, the problems of which the authors write so much in the manuscript. Therefore, we recommend that the authors supplement the factor analysis and literature review with publications devoted to the analysis of cluster influence in the agro-industrial complex. For example,

1) Mingaleva, Z., Shaidurova, N., Prajová, V. The role of technoparks in technological upgrading of the economy. The example of agricultural production. Management Systems in Production Engineering. 2018. 26(4), рр. 241-245. DOI 10.1515/mspe-2018-0040.

2) Li, Z.-F., Chen, T. Evolution analysis of standardization production behavior in GI Agricultural product enterprise cluster//19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management: Assistive Technology of Industrial Engineering, 2013, 361-368 DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-38391-5_37

3) Hajiyev, P., Mingaleva, Z. Main ways of attracting investments into agriculture and agro-industrial complex of Russia. Life Science Journal, 2013, 10 (4), pp. 824-829.

These and other additional literature sources will allow the authors to strengthen the conclusion they make in the conclusions (lines 613-616): «It is necessary to change the mode of economic development, change the previous extensive mode of production and operation, develop the resource-saving, environment-friendly and ecological intensive mode of operation and development, and take the road of sustainable development, which is an inevitable requirement of the development road in the new era».

This directly relates to the third major observation regarding the manuscript:

3. Policy implications needs to be improved.it is important to include a policy recommendations for each of the results.

Conclusion. The article is interesting, the model is good. However, the manuscript needs to be improved in terms of the formulation and scientific justification of the research hypothesis, as well as in the field of literature review.

In general, the work deserves support, but after the correction of the comments made and re-checking.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

I would like to congratulate the authors of the manuscript on the good results of their work on improving the article. They were able to do a lot and now the manuscript can be published

Back to TopTop