Next Article in Journal
Effect of Substrate Flow Rate on Nutrient Uptake and Use Efficiency in Hydroponically Grown Swiss Chard (Beta vulgaris L. ssp. cicla ‘Seiyou Shirokuki’)
Next Article in Special Issue
Single-Species Artificial Grasslands Decrease Soil Multifunctionality in a Temperate Steppe on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Genotype and Climatic Conditions on the Oil Content and Its Fatty Acids Composition of Carthamus tinctorius L. Seeds
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Promotion of Festuca sinensis under Heavy Metal Treatment Mediated by Epichloë Endophyte

State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2021, 11(10), 2049; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11102049
Submission received: 5 September 2021 / Revised: 6 October 2021 / Accepted: 8 October 2021 / Published: 12 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant-Soil-Microbe Interactions in Natural Soils)

Abstract

:
To more clearly clarify the relationship between the Epichloë endophyte and its host, F. sinensis, the effects of Epichloë endophyte on F. sinensis performance under heavy metal treatment was investigated. The growth performance and physiology variations of F. sinensis with (E+) and without the endophyte (E−) were evaluated after they were subjected to Zn2+ and Cd2+ treatments. The results showed that heavy metal treatments had significant effects on plants, as the performance of plants under Zn2+ and Cd2+ treatments was significantly different with plants under control treatment (p < 0.05). Cd2+ treatments showed a hormesis effect, whereas Zn2+ did not. The endophyte increased host heavy metal stress tolerance by promoting host growth as the E+ plants had significantly higher plant height, tiller number, root length (p < 0.05). The endophyte also promoted ion uptake by the host and induced endogenous hormone production (p < 0.05). These results suggested that the Epichloë endophyte regulated host growth and physiology to improve association tolerance to environmental conditions. This study provides another example that the Epichloë endophyte can increase plant tolerance to metal stress.

1. Introduction

Festuca sinensis Keng ex E.B. Alexeev, is a native cool-season perennial grass species distributed across the cold and semi-arid regions of China. This species, grazed by cattle and sheep, is widely utilised in grassland production on the Qinghai–Tibet plateau of China [1,2]. It is also important for grassland establishment, restoration of degraded grassland and ecological management [3]. F. sinensis is frequently infected with an asexual, symptomless Epichloë species [4,5,6,7,8]. This endophyte has been isolated and identified by morphology with colony, texture, conidia and conidiophore, and phylogene with house-keeping gene, which confirmed that the strain is new species name after Epichloë sinensis [9]. Epichloë endophytes interact mutualistically with their host plant, mainly by enhancing the fitness of the grass host and protection from both biotic and abiotic stresses [10,11]. Research to reveal the relationship between F. sinensis and Epichloë endophytes showed that associations between F. sinensis and endophytes produce alkaloids [12], and endophyte could increase F. sinensis seed germination and seedling growth [13], competition in mix-sowing grassland [14], enhance host cold-stress resistance [6,13], and improve host drought and waterlogged condition resistance [15]. However, the effects of the endophyte on host tolerance to other stress such as heavy metals and salt have not been clarified.
With the increasing industrialization of the global economy over the last century, heavy metals have been introduced into the environment and have caused extensive environmental problems [16]. Phytoremediation, the use of green plants to remove pollutants from the environment or to render them harmless, is an in situ, solar-powered remediation technology [17]. This technology can be used to clean up and/or stabilize heavy metal contaminants, and has been considered to be the most promising technology due to its minimal site disturbance and low cost when compared with conventional remediation methods [18]. Microbe-assisted phytoremediation is a novel and promising concept. So far, numerous studies have demonstrated that microorganisms can enhance phytoremediation efficiently [19]. Epichloë endophytes can also increase the host stress tolerance of heavy metals such as cadmium (Cd2+), aluminum (Al3+), zinc (Zn2+) and copper (Cu2+) tolerance [20,21,22,23]. However, the relationship between E. sinensis endophyte and F. sinensis under heavy metal stress is unknown. The aims of this study were to investigate the performances of F. sinensis—endophyte interactions under heavy metal treatment, and to evaluate the possibility of employing the F. sinensis—endophyte association for phytoremediation in heavy metal polluted soils.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

F. sinensis seeds were collected from endophyte infected (E+) or endophyte free (E−) plants in summer, 2016 in experimental field blocks (104°39′ E, 35°89′ N, altitude 1653 m) at the College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology (CPAST), Yuzhong campus of Lanzhou University [12]. The plants were grown from seed collected in Hongyuan, Sichuang (102°33′ E, 32°48′ N, altitude 3491 m) in 2013. Endophyte viability in seeds was assessed by aniline blue staining and microscopic examination [4]. After the seeds were treated with aniline blue solution, the sampled seed was marked as E+ if the longitudinally-orientated hyphae of the Epichloë endophyte were observed in the seed skin and aleuronic layer, and vice versa. After assessment, the seeds were stored in 4 °C until utilization. In August 2017, the well-filled, healthy-looking E+ and E− seeds were planted in plastic trays (30 cm × 25 cm × 8 cm) filled with 1.5 kg soil (commercial fine sandy soil, Lanzhou) which had been sterilized in an oven at 130 °C for 30 min. Five rows with 10 seeds were planted per tray at a depth of 1 cm. Two trays containing E+ and E− seeds were placed in a temperature-controlled greenhouse (18–24 °C) with 10 h of illumination per day in the Yuzhong campus of Lanzhou University. After plants had 3 tillers, endophyte viability in E+ and E− population seedlings were determined by microscopic examination of host leaf sheath pieces after they had been stained with aniline blue [5]. After the leaf sheaths were gently peeled from the tissue and treated with aniline blue solution, the sampled plants were marked as E+ if the longitudinally-orientated hyphae of the Epichloë endophyte were observed in the tissues, and vice versa. The seedlings germinated from E+ seeds with hyphae of the endophyte were marked as E+ and the seedlings germinated from E− seeds without hyphae were marked as E−.

2.2. Experimental Design

The marked seedlings were transplanted into round pots (upper diameter 15.5 cm × lower diameter 11.5 cm × height 14 cm) containing the same amount of media (sterilized commercial vermiculite and black soil in a w/w ratio 3:1) which fill the pot. Each pot had only one similar growth seeding and equal initial water treatment. After one-month stabilization with the same irrigation, three different treatments were established, which included control treatment (CK), Zn2+ treatment (Zn, 500 mg·L−1 ZnCl2) and Cd2+ treatment (Cd, 100 mg·L−1 CdCl2). Each treatment has 5 replicates which were randomly placed in greenhouse maintained at a constant condition (temperature: 25 ± 2 °C, humidity: 42 ± 5%). During the experimental period, the plants under control treatment were supplied with 100 mL water every 3 days, Zn2+ and Cd2+ treatments were watered with 100 mL ZnCl2 solution of 500 mg·L−1 and 100 mL CdCl2 solution of 100 mg·L−1 at 1st and 14th day, respectively, and 100 mL water were also supplied with every 3 interval days.

2.3. Experimental Evaluations

2.3.1. Determination of Endogenous Phytohormones

After 28 days growth, 2 g of fresh leaves were collected from each plant for gibberellin (GA3), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), cytokinins (CTK) and abscisic acid (ABA) content tests using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, following the procedure of kits which included extraction with phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4), coating the corresponding antibody of each phytohormones, blocking and detection at 450 nm (Danshi biology, Shanghai, China) [24].

2.3.2. Plant Growth

The whole plants were destructively harvested from pots after 28 days growth, washed with distilled water and dried on a filter paper. The height, root length and tiller number of each plant were recorded. All harvested plants were separated into roots and shoots and their fresh weight was recorded. Dry weight was obtained after oven-drying at 60 °C until a constant weight was reached. The dry aboveground and underground parts from each treatment were weighed separately to determine total dry matter per plant. After weighting, the plant materials were ground twice using a mixer mill (Retch 400MM, German) at 30 Hz for 2 min for analysis of alkaloid, Zn2+ and Cd2+ ion contents.

2.3.3. Measurements of Zn2+ and Cd2+ Ions Concentrations

Zn2+ and Cd2+ concentrations in plants were analysed using atomic absorption spectrometry (M6AA system, Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA) at 213.9 and 228.8 nm, respectively, after mineralization in mixture of acids (HCl-HNO3-HF-HClO4) [25,26].
The translocation factor (TF) is the concentration ratio of metal acclimatised in the shoot to that present in the root.
TF = Cshoot/Croot.
where Cshoot (mg·kg1) and Croot (mg·kg1) represent the metal concentration in the shoot and root, respectively [27].

2.3.4. Measurements of Alkaloid Concentrations

Concentrations of peramine and lolitrems B were measured using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [28,29].

2.4. Statistical Analyses

All averages and standard errors of the difference (SE) of measurements were recorded in Excel software, and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 18.0, Chicago, IL, USA). After a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality and one-way ANOVA for descriptive and test homogeneity of variance, a two-way ANOVA at the 95% confidence level was used to estimate the effects of endophyte and heavy metal treatments on host plants. A repeated-measures ANOVA with Fisher’s least significant differences (LSD) test was used to determine whether differences between means were statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Plant Growth

Both heavy metal treatments and endophytes had significant effects on plant growth (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3) and plant physiology (Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7).
The plant height (Figure 1A and Figure 2) and tiller numbers (Figure 1B and Figure 2) of the E+ plants were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those of E− plants under two heavy metal (Zn2+ and Cd2+) treatments and control (except for tiller numbers). The heavy metal treatments had significant effects on plant height (Figure 1A). For both the E+ and E− plants, the plant height was highest under Zn2+ treatment and lowest under Cd2+ treatment (p < 0.05). However, heavy metal treatments had no significant effects on tiller numbers for both E+ and E− plants (Figure 1B).
The root length of E+ plants was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of E− plants under control and Zn2+ treatments (Figure 3A). Heavy metal treatments only had significant effects on the root length of the E+ plants as the E+ plants had significantly longer root length under control and Zn2+ treatments than that under Cd2+ treatment. The plant biomass (Figure 3B) of E+ plants was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those of E− plants under Zn2+ treatment. For both the E+ and E− plants, the plant biomass was highest under Zn2+ treatment and lowest under Cd2+ treatment (p < 0.05).

3.2. Cd2+ and Zn2+ Ion Concentration

Both the aboveground (Figure 4A) and underground (Figure 4B) Cd2+ ion concentrations were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in E+ plants than those in E− plants under Cd2+ treatment. For both E+ and E− plants, aboveground and underground Cd2+ ion concentrations were significantly higher (p < 0.05) under Cd2+ treatment than those under control and Zn2+ treatments.
The aboveground Zn2+ ion concentration (Figure 4C) of E+ plants was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of E− plants only under Zn2+ treatment. For both E+ and E− plants, aboveground Zn2+ ion concentration were significantly higher under Zn2+ treatment than that under the control and Cd2+ treatments. The underground Zn2+ ion concentrations (Figure 4D) of E+ plants were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of E− plants under control and Zn2+ treatments. For E+ plant, the underground Zn2+ ion concentrations were highest under Zn2+ treatment and lowest under Cd2+ treatment (p < 0.05). For E− plants, the underground Zn2+ ion concentrations were significant higher under Zn2+ treatment than under control and Cd2+ treatments. There was no significant difference in the underground Zn2+ ion concentrations between the control and Cd2+ treatments.
The TF values of the Zn2+ and Cd2+ ions ranged from 0.56–1.16 (Figure 5A,B). The TF value of the Zn2+ ions (Figure 5A) of E+ plants were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those of E− plants under Cd2+ treatment, whereas they were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than those of E− plants under the control treatment. For E+ plants, the TF values of the Zn2+ ions were highest under Cd2+ treatment and lowest under the control treatment (p < 0.05). For E− plants, the TF values of the Zn2+ ions were significantly higher under control treatment than that under the Zn2+ and Cd2+ treatments (p < 0.05). The TF values of the Cd2+ ions (Figure 5B) of the E+ plants were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of E− plants only under Cd2+ treatment. For the E+ plant, the TF value of the Cd2+ ions weres highest under Cd2+ treatment (p < 0.05). For the E− plant, there was no significant difference in the TF value of the Cd2+ ions between these three treatments (p < 0.05).

3.3. Plant Hormone Concentrations

GA3 concentrations (Figure 6A) in E+ plants were consistently higher (p < 0.05) than those in E− plants for all 3 treatments. For E+ plants, GA3 concentrations were highest under Zn2+ treatment and lowest under Cd2+ treatment (p < 0.05). However, for E− plants, GA3 concentrations were highest under control treatment and lowest under Cd2+ treatment (p < 0.05). The CTK concentrations (Figure 6B) in E+ plants were consistently higher (p < 0.05) than those in E− plants for all 3 treatments. For both E+ and E− plants, CTK concentrations were highest under Zn2+ treatment and lowest under Cd2+ treatment (p < 0.05). The IAA concentrations (Figure 6C) in E+ plants were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those in E− plants for all 3 treatments. For both E+ and E− plants, IAA concentrations under control and Zn2+ treatments were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those under Cd2+ treatment. The ABA concentrations (Figure 6D) in E− plants were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those in E+ plants under Zn2+ treatment. For both E+ and E− plants, ABA concentrations were highest under Cd2+ treatment and lowest under Zn2+ treatment (p < 0.05).

3.4. Alkaloids

E+ plants produced both tested alkaloids: peramine and lolitrem B, while E− plants did not produce any alkaloids (Figure 7). The heavy metal treatments only had significant effects on lolitrem B concentrations. There was no significant difference in peramine concentrations among these 3 treatments. The lolitrem B concentrations under Cd2+ treatment were significantly higher than those under control and Zn2+ treatments.

4. Discussion

Excessive Zn2+ in soil will cause heavy metal pollution and reduce plant growth, although it is a necessary trace element for plant growth [30]. A previous study has shown that 300 mg/L Zn2+ in soil inhibited tillering and leaf extension and reduced biomass of Achnatherum sibiricum [2]. Another study showed that 20 mg/L Zn2+ promoted F. arundinacea seed germination and biomass accumulation, whereas 50 mg/L Zn2+ inhibited seed germination [31]. However, our study showed that plant height and biomass of F. sinensis under 500 mg/L Zn2+ treatment significantly increased (p < 0.05) compared with control. The reason why this Zn2+ dosage did not show a hormesis effect in plants needs further clarification by a deeper characterization of the used soil such as organic matter content, soil pH and the actual bioavailability of zinc. Cd2+ is one of the heavy metals that is most toxic to plants. It disturbs plant physiological processes, including photosynthesis, respiration and nutrient element absorption, and seriously inhibits plant growth and development [32]. Cd2+ inhibited the germination and growth of A. inebrians, Elymus dahuricus and Hordeum brevisubulatum, leading to leaf yellowing, radicle browning and biomass reduction [33,34]. Cd2+ has a sustained inhibitory impact on seed germination and seedling growth of A. sibiricum [24]. The present study found that 100 mg/L Cd2+ inhibited plant height and biomass accumulation, which were consistent with the findings of other studies that showed Cd2+ usually inhibited plant growth.
In the present study, Epichloë endophytes significantly increased plant height, tiller number and biomass of F. sinensis under Zn2+ treatment, and significantly increased tiller number and root growth under Cd2+ treatment. Similar results were also found from previous studies which suggested that endophytes increased host tolerance to heavy metals and alleviated the toxicity. Bonnet et al. also found that endophytes increased perennial ryegrass tolerance to Zn2+ with increased aboveground biomass [21]. Endophytes promoted the performance of Lolium perenne, F. arundinacea and A. sibiricum tillering under Cd2+ treatment [2,22]. Endophytes can alleviate the toxicity of Cd2+ to F. arundinacea and F. pratensis as E+ plants have more biomass than E− plants. Epichloë endophytes can also increase host heavy metal stress tolerances, such as Cd2+, Al3+, Zn2+ and Cu2+ [20,21,22].
In the present study, endophyte improved the uptake of Zn2+and Cd2+ ions in plants which suggests that endophytes may not reduce the toxicity condition of host plants. Especially for the TF value of Zn2+ and Cd2+ ions under Cd2+ treatment, the values of E+ plants were over 1 and also were significantly higher than E− plants, which showed that Cd2+ ion translocation from roots to shoots remained very high. This was consistent with the higher concentrations of Cd2+ ions in aboveground plants. The changes of ion absorption and distribution may have relationship with root exudates. Previous studies showed that endophytes improved the phenolic contents of F. arundinacea and A. sibiricum which reduced the toxicity of heavy metals [35,36,37]. Phenolics in root exudates of F. arundinacea could chelate with some heavy metal ions, which reduced heavy metal activity and toxicity [38]. However, endophytes in the present study did not show these effects, and the ion absorption in plants need more explanation with other physiological measurements.
Heavy metal stress can disturb plant physiological processes, including photosynthesis, photoelectronic transfer and mineral nutrition absorption [39]. The response of hosts to abiotic stress such as heavy metals is very complicated. Endogenous hormones variation is one of the direct responses. Plant endogenous hormones are organic substances that regulate plant growth and development, which may be part of a signal-transduction pathway, and stimulate signal reactions for stress responses [40,41]. Studies have revealed that endogenous regulations (e.g., biosynthesis, transport, redistribution, and conjugation of plant hormones) play a crucial role during the acclimation process against stress [42,43]. Exogenous application of plant hormones has also been reported to enhance stress tolerance in plants affected by heavy metals [44,45,46]. In the present study, the four tested hormone (GA3, CTK, IAA and ABA) contents had significant variations under heavy metal stress. Zn2+ treatment increased the contents of GA3 and CTK and reduced the contents of ABA. Cd2+ treatment reduced the contents GA3 and IAA. Previous studies also revealed that Cd2+ treatment reduced the contents of IAA, ethylene and GA3 in Oryza sativa, which suggests that Cd2+ stress disturbs the biosynthesis of endogenous hormones [47]. These changes of endogenous hormones confirmed that the plants utilize hormones during stress response. Epichloë endophytes also have significant effects on endogenous hormones in plants and increased GA3, CTK and IAA contents and reduced ABA contents. These results were consistent with the previous studies that demonstrated Epichloë endophytes change hormones to improve host stress tolerance [10,11,48]. Bunyard and McInnis reported that E+ tall fescue plants produced significantly more ABA in response to drought stress than did E− plants [49]. Some glasshouse-based research has indicated a similar endophytE−enhancement of ABA concentration in tall fescue leaf tissue in response to drought [50]. Similar results were also observed in some Chinese native grasses like A. inebrians and F. sinensis. E+ Chinese wild rye (Leymus chinensis) plants have a higher SA content than E− plants, especially when they are exposed to B. sorokiniana and C. lunata [51]. Some endophytes have been reported to produce IAA and related indole compounds in culture [52,53]. The concentration increase in E+ plants may be also adjusted by the production of IAA and related compounds in planta by endophytes. Phytohormone production in planta may also induce the defense-related secondary metabolism in plants. However, far too little is known about the role that hormones may play in symbiosis and their direct effects on host fitness traits. The interaction of plants with heavy metal stresses are generally associated with immobilization in roots, ion balance, antioxidant defence, phytochelation, etc. More studies must be conducted to clarify these mechanisms.
The benefits that endophytes confer on plant health, and conversely, detrimental effects on animal health, are partially due to the production of biologically active alkaloids [54,55,56]. Two such important alkaloid classes are ergots and lolitrems (indole diterpenes), which cause neurotoxic effects on grazing and granivorous vertebrates. Two other classes of endophyte-derived alkaloids, peramine and lolines, are known to be highly active against invertebrates, yet have little or no activity against mammalian species [57]. Alkaloids may play roles in host biotic stress tolerance such as to pathogens and insects [58,59,60,61]. The contents of alkaloids varied with many factors, including endophytes, host genotypes and environmental conditions [48,62]. In the present study, the contents of lolitrem B increased under heavy metal stress, which suggest its association with stress tolerance.
Our study showed that endophytes can promote the growth and development of F. sinensis under heavy metal stress. The mechanism that endophytes employed in improving host heavy metals stress tolerance included increasing the content of growth hormones such as IAA and GA3, reducing the content of ABA and adjusting the alkaloid contents. This study has hence provided more evidence about the Epichloë endophyte relationship with hosts, and extended the symbiosis research to more native species. These results are important for understanding of microbe-assisted phytoremediation. As the interaction between host–endophyte and abiotic stress tolerance is complicated, additional studies are being conducting to understand the mechanisms for endophyte-mediated heavy metal stress tolerance.

Author Contributions

P.T. and M.W. conceived and designed the experiments. M.W. contributed reagents, materials, and analysis tools. M.L. contributed to taking care of plants. P.T., M.W. and M.G. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the manuscript and approved the submitted version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research reported here was funded by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (31971768; 32061123004), the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-22 Green Manue) and Lanzhou University enterprisE−funded project {(19)0439}.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Zhongnan Nie (Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions, VIC, Australia) for proofreading and polishing our manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nan, Z.B.; Li, C.J. Neotyphodium in native grasses in China and observations on endophyte/host interactions. In Proceedings of the 4th international Neotyphodium-Grass Interactions Symposium, Soest, Germany, 27–29 September 2000; pp. 41–50. [Google Scholar]
  2. Li, C.; Ren, A.Z.; Gao, Y.B. Effect of endophyte infection on Zn resistance of tall fescue. Acta. Ecol. Sin. 2010, 30, 1684–1692, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nan, Z.B. The grassland farming system and sustainable agricultural development in China. Grassl. Sci. 2005, 51, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nan, Z.B. Incidence and distribution of endophytic fungi in seeds of some native and introduced grasses in China. Acta Prataculturae Sin. 1996, 5, 1–8, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  5. Nan, Z.B. Incidence and distribution of endophytic fungi in seedlings and plants of some native and introduced grasses in China. Acta Prataculturae Sin. 1996, 5, 13–17, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhou, L.Y.; Li, C.J.; Zhang, X.X.; Johnson, R.; Bao, G.S.; Yao, X.; Chai, Q. Effects of cold shocked Epichloë infected Festuca sinensis on ergot alkaloid accumulation. Fungal Ecol. 2015, 14, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhou, L.Y.; Zhang, X.X.; Li, C.J.; Christensen, M.J.; Nan, Z.B. Antifungal activity and phytochemical investigation of the asexual endophyte of Epichloë sp. from Festuca sinensis. Sci. China Life Sci. 2015, 58, 821–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Song, H.; Nan, Z.B.; Song, Q.Y.; Xia, C.; Li, X.Z.; Yao, X.; Xu, W.B.; Kuang, Y.; Tian, P.; Zhang, Q.P. Advances in research on Epichloë endophytes in Chinese native grasses. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Tian, P.; Xu, W.B.; Li, C.J.; Song, H.; Wang, M.N.; Schardl, C.L.; Nan, Z.B. Phylogenetic relationship and taxonomy of a hybrid Epichloë species symbiotic with Festuca sinensis. Mycol. Prog. 2020, 19, 1069–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Saikkonen, K.; Wäli, P.; Helander, M.; Faeth, S.H. Evolution of endophyte-plant symbioses. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Xia, C.; Li, N.N.; Zhang, Y.W.; Li, C.J.; Zhang, X.X.; Nan, Z.B. Role of Epichloë endophytes in defense responses of cool-season grasses to pathogens: A review. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 2061–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Tian, P.; Kuang, Y.; Lin, W.H.; Wang, J.J.; Nan, Z.B. Shoot morphology and alkaloid content of Epichloë endophyte–Festuca sinensis associations. Crop. Pasture Sci. 2018, 69, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Peng, Q.Q.; Li, C.J.; Song, M.L.; Nan, Z.B. Effects of seed hydropriming on growth of Festuca sinensis infected with Neotyphodium endophyte. Fungal Ecol. 2013, 6, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lin, W.H.; Wang, X.X.; Wang, J.J.; Nzabanita, C.; Xu, W.B.; Yang, L.; Xi, H.F.; Tian, P.; Wang, Y.B.; Li, M.M.; et al. Intra-and interspecific competition of Elymus nutans griseb. and Festuca sinensis keng. ex eb alexeev. infected by Epichloë endophyte. Bangladesh. J. Bot. 2018, 47, 699–709. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang, J.J.; Zhou, Y.P.; Lin, W.H.; Li, M.M.; Wang, M.N.; Wang, Z.G.; Kuang, Y.; Tian, P. Effect of an Epichloë endophyte on adaptability to water stress in Festuca sinensis. Fungal Ecol. 2017, 30, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Masindi, V.; Muedi, K.L. Environmental contamination by heavy metals. Heavy Metals. 2018, 10, 115–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Weyens, N.; Lelie, D.V.D.; Taghavi, S.; Vangronsveld, J. Phytoremediation: Lant–endophyte partnerships take the challenge. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2009, 20, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gong, Y.; Zhao, D.; Wang, Q. An overview of field-scale studies on remediation of soil contaminated with heavy metals and metalloids: Technical progress over the last decade. Water Res. 2018, 147, 440–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ayangbenro, A.S.; Babalolam, O.O. A new strategy for heavy metal polluted environments: A review of microbial biosorbents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Malinowski, D.P.; Belesky, D.P. Adaptations of endophyte-infected cool-season grasses to environmental stresses: Mechanisms of drought and mineral stress tolerance. Crop. Sci. 2000, 40, 923–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bonnet, M.; Camares, O.; Veisseire, P. Effects of zinc and influence of Acremonium lolii on growth parameters, chlorophyll a fluorescence and antioxidant enzyme activities of ryegrass (Lolium perenne L. cv Apollo). J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51, 945–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ren, A.Z.; Gao, Y.B.; Zhang, L.; Xie, F. Effects of cadmium on growth parameters of endophyte-infected endophyte-free ryegrass. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2006, 169, 857–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Malinowski, D.P.; Belesky, D.P. Epichloë (formerly Neotyphodium) fungal endophytes increase adaptation of cool-season perennial grasses to environmental stresses. Acta Agrobot. 2019, 72, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, Y.; Li, B.; Du, M.W.; Eneji, E.A.; Wang, B.M.; Duan, L.S.; Li, Z.H.; Tian, X.L. Mechanism of phytohormone involvement in feedback regulation of cotton leaf senescence induced by potassium deficiency. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 5887–5901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Fargaová, A. Toxicity comparison of some possible toxic metals (Cd, Cu, Pb, Se, Zn) on young seedlings of Sinapis alba L. Plant Soil Environ. 2004, 50, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Nusrat JalbaniArain, M.B.; Kazi, T.G.; Jamali, M.K.; Jalbani, N.; Afridi, H.I.; Baig, J.A. Speciation of heavy metals in untreated domestic waste water sludge by time saving BCR sequential extraction method. Environ. Sci. Health A 2007, 42, 649–659. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sidhu, G.P.S.; Bali, A.S.; Singh, H.P.; Batish, D.R.; Kohli, R.K. Insights into the tolerance and phytoremediation potential of Coronopus didymus L.(Sm) grown under zinc stress. Chemosphere 2020, 244, 125350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gallagher, R.T.; Hawkes, A.D.; Stewart, J.M. Rapid determination of the neurotoxin lolitrem B in perennial ryegrass by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. J. Chromatogr. A 1985, 321, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ball, O.J.P.; Prestidge, R.A.; Sprosen, J.M. Interrelationships between Acremonium lolii, peramine, and lolitrem B in perennial ryegrass. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 1527–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Chaudhary, D.S.; Totawat, K.L. Zinc and phosphorus interaction on growth and nutrient uptake by wheat. Ann. Arid. Zone 1985, 24, 31–38. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhao, D.D. Studies on Growth and Resistance of Festuca Arundinacea under the Stress of Cd2+ and Cd2+-Zn2+; Sichuan Normal University: Chengdu, China, 2008; (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  32. Nagajyoti, P.C.; Lee, K.D.; Sreekanth, T.V.M. Heavy metals, occurrence and toxicity for plants: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2010, 8, 199–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, X.X.; Li, C.J.; Nan, Z.B. Effects of cadmium stress on growth and anti-oxidative systems in Achnatherum inebrians, symbiotic with Neotyphodium gansuens. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 175, 703–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, X.X.; Li, C.J.; Nan, Z.B. Effects of cadmium stress on seed germination and seedling growth of Elymus dahuricus infected with the Neotyphodium endophyte. Sci. China Life Sci. 2012, 55, 793–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Malinowski, D.P.; Alloush, G.A.; Belesky, D.P. Evidence for chemical changes on the root surface of tall fescue in response to infection with the fungal endophyte Neotyphodium coenophialum. Plant Soil 1998, 205, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Malinowski, D.; Elesky, D.P. Infection with leaf fungal endophyte Neotyphodium coenophialum increase aluminium sequestration on root surfaces of tall fescue. J. Plant Nutr. 1999, 22, 1335–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Malinowski, D.P.; Zuo, H.; Belesky, D.P.; Alloush, G.A. Evidence for copper binding by extracellular root exudates of tall fescue but not perennial ryegrass infected with Neotyphodium spp. Endophytes. Plant Soil 2004, 267, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Creek, R.; Wade, G.L. Excretion of phenolic compounds from the roots of Festuca arundinacea, Eragrostis curvula, and Lespedeza striat. Trans. Ky. Acad. Sci. 1985, 46, 51–55. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lanaras, T.; Moustakas, M.; Symeonidis, L.; Diamantoglou, S.; Karataglis, S. Plant metal content, growth responses and some photosynthetic measurements on field-cultivated wheat growing on ore bodies enriched in Cu. Physiol. Plant. 1993, 88, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Argueso, C.T.; Raines, T.; Kieber, J.J. Cytokinin signaling and transcriptional networks. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13, 533–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Qin, H.; Gu, Q.; Zhang, J.L.; Sun, L.; Kuppu, S.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Burow, M.; Payton, P.; Blumwald, E.; Zhang, H. Regulated expression of an Isopentenyltransferase Gene (IPT) in peanut significantly improves drought tolerance and increases yield under field conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 1904–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Wilkinson, S.; Kudoyarova, G.R.; Veselov, D.S.; Arkhipova, T.N.; Davies, W.J. Plant hormone interactions: Innovative targets for crop breeding and management. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 3499–3509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Srivastava, S.; Chiappetta, A.; Beatrice, M. Identification and profiling of arsenic stress-induced miRNAs in Brassica juncea. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Elobeid, M.; Go¨bel, C.; Feussner, I.; Polle, A. Cadmium interferes with auxin physiology and lignification in Poplar. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1413–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Zhu, X.F.; Jiang, T.; Wang, Z.W.; Lei, G.J.; Shi, Y.Z.; Li, G.X.; Zheng, S.J. Gibberellic acid alleviates cadmium toxicity by reducing nitric oxide accumulation and expression of IRT1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 239, 302–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Krishnamurthy, A.; Rathinasabapathi, B. Auxin and its transport play a role in plant tolerance to arsenite-induced oxidative stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36, 1838–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mei, Y.X. Effect of Endophyte Gao Y1-1 Infection on Endogenous Hormones and Organic Acids of Rice Seedlings under Cd and/or Al Stress; Shenyang Normal University: Shenyang, China, 2017; (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  48. Battista, J.P.D.; Bouton, J.H.; Bacon, C.W.; Siegel, M.R. Rhizome and herbage production of endophyte-removed tall fescue clones and populations. Crop Sci. 1990, 82, 651–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bunyard, B.; Mclnnis, T.M. Evidence for elevated phytohormone levels in endophyte-infected tall fescue. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Acremonium/Grass Interactions; Quisenberry, S.S., Joost, R.E., Eds.; Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station: Baton Rouge, LA, USA, 1990; pp. 185–188. [Google Scholar]
  50. Joost, R.E. Acremonium in fescue and ryegrass: Boon or bane? A review. J. Anim. Sci. 1995, 73, 881–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Wang, X.Y.; Qin, J.H.; Chen, W.; Zhou, Y.; Ren, A.Z.; Gao, Y.B. Pathogen resistant advantage of endophyte-infected over endophyte-free Leymus chinensis is strengthened by pre-drought treatment. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2016, 144, 477–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Battista, J.P.D.; Bacon, C.W.; Severson, R.F.; Plattner, R.D.; Bouton, J.H. Indole acetic acid production by the fungal endophyte of tall fescue. Agron. J. 1990, 82, 878–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yue, Q.; Miller, C.J.; White, J.F.; Richardson, M.D. Isolation and characterization of fungal inhibitors from Epichloë festucae. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 4687–4692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bush, L.P.; Wilkinson, H.H.; Schardl, C.L. Bioprotective alkaloids of grass-fungal endophyte symbioses. Plant Physiol. 1997, 114, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Easton, H.S.; Latch, G.C.M.; Tapper, B.A.; Ball, O.J.P. Ryegrass host genetic control of contentrations of endophyte-derived alkaloids. Crop Sci. 2002, 42, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Porter, J.K. Analysis of endophyte toxins: Fescue and other grasses toxic to livestock. J. Anim. Sci. 1995, 73, 871–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Rowan, D.D.; Dymock, J.J.; Brimble, M.A. Effect of fungal metabolite peramine and analogs on feeding and development of Argentine stem weevil (Listronotus bonariensis). J. Chem. Ecol. 1990, 16, 1683–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Sabzalian, M.R.; Mirlohi, A.; Sharifnabi, B. Reaction to powdery mildew fungus, Blumeria graminis in endophyte-infected and endophyte-free tall and meadow fescues. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2012, 41, 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ma, M.Z.; Christensen, M.J.; Nan, Z.B. Effects of the endophyte Epichloë festucae var. lolii of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) on indicators of oxidative stress from pathogenic fungi during seed germination and seedling growth. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2015, 141, 571–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Popay, A.J.; Cotching, B.; Moorhead, A.; Ferguson, C.M. AR37 endophyte effects on porina and root aphid populations and ryegrass damage in the field. Proc. N. Zeal. Grassl Assoc. 2012, 74, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Matsukura, K.; Shiba, T.; Sasaki, T.; Yoshida, K.; Matsumura, M. Dynamics of Neotyphodium uncinatum and N-formylloline in Italian ryegrass, and their relation to insect resistance in the field. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 116, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Rasmussen, S.; Parsons, A.J.; Bassett, S.; Christensen, M.J.; Hume, D.E.; Johnson, L.J.; Johnson, R.D.; Simpson, W.R.; Stacke, C.; Voisey, C.R. High nitrogen supply and carbohydrate content reduce fungal endophyte and alkaloid concentration in Lolium perenne. New Phytol. 2007, 173, 787–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effect of Epichloë endophyte and Cd2+ and Zn2+ treatments on plant height (A) and tiller number (B) of F. sinensis. Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Effect of Epichloë endophyte and Cd2+ and Zn2+ treatments on plant height (A) and tiller number (B) of F. sinensis. Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 11 02049 g001
Figure 2. Photos showing comparative phenotypes of E+ and E− plants under different treatments after harvesting.
Figure 2. Photos showing comparative phenotypes of E+ and E− plants under different treatments after harvesting.
Agronomy 11 02049 g002
Figure 3. Effects of Epichloë endophyte and Cd2+ and Zn2+ treatments on plant root length (A) and biomass (B) of F. sinensis. Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Effects of Epichloë endophyte and Cd2+ and Zn2+ treatments on plant root length (A) and biomass (B) of F. sinensis. Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 11 02049 g003
Figure 4. Effect of Epichloë endophyte and Cd2+ and Zn2+ treatments on the aboveground and underground concentration of Cd2+ and Zn2+ ions in F. sinensis; (A) aboveground Cd2+ ions, (B) underground Cd2+ ions, (C) aboveground Zn2+ ions, (D) underground Zn2+ ions. Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Effect of Epichloë endophyte and Cd2+ and Zn2+ treatments on the aboveground and underground concentration of Cd2+ and Zn2+ ions in F. sinensis; (A) aboveground Cd2+ ions, (B) underground Cd2+ ions, (C) aboveground Zn2+ ions, (D) underground Zn2+ ions. Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 11 02049 g004
Figure 5. Effect of Epichloë endophytes and Cd2+ and Zn2+ treatments on TF values of F. sinensis; (A): TF values of Zn2+ ions; (B): TF values of Cd2+ ions. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Effect of Epichloë endophytes and Cd2+ and Zn2+ treatments on TF values of F. sinensis; (A): TF values of Zn2+ ions; (B): TF values of Cd2+ ions. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 11 02049 g005
Figure 6. Effect of Epichloë endophytes and Cd2+ and Zn2+ treatments on the concentration of GA3 (A), CTK (B), IAA (C) and ABA (D) in F. sinensis. Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Effect of Epichloë endophytes and Cd2+ and Zn2+ treatments on the concentration of GA3 (A), CTK (B), IAA (C) and ABA (D) in F. sinensis. Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 11 02049 g006
Figure 7. Peramine and lolitrem B concentrations of F. sinensis E+ plants under Zn2+ and Cd2+ treatments. Note: The left is the alkaloid peak. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 7. Peramine and lolitrem B concentrations of F. sinensis E+ plants under Zn2+ and Cd2+ treatments. Note: The left is the alkaloid peak. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 11 02049 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, M.; Tian, P.; Gao, M.; Li, M. The Promotion of Festuca sinensis under Heavy Metal Treatment Mediated by Epichloë Endophyte. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2049. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11102049

AMA Style

Wang M, Tian P, Gao M, Li M. The Promotion of Festuca sinensis under Heavy Metal Treatment Mediated by Epichloë Endophyte. Agronomy. 2021; 11(10):2049. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11102049

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Meining, Pei Tian, Min Gao, and Miaomiao Li. 2021. "The Promotion of Festuca sinensis under Heavy Metal Treatment Mediated by Epichloë Endophyte" Agronomy 11, no. 10: 2049. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11102049

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop