Next Article in Journal
Nematicidal Evaluation and Active Compounds Isolation of Aspergillus japonicus ZW1 against Root-Knot Nematodes Meloidogyne incognita
Next Article in Special Issue
QTL Mapping for Seedling and Adult Plant Resistance to Leaf and Stem Rusts in Pamyati Azieva × Paragon Mapping Population of Bread Wheat
Previous Article in Journal
Bacterial Community Tolerance to Tetracycline Antibiotics in Cu Polluted Soils
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Assisted Selection for Pollination-Constant and Non-Astringent Type without Male Flowers in Spanish Germplasm for Persimmon Breeding
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Multi-Trait Regressor Stacking Increased Genomic Prediction Accuracy of Sorghum Grain Composition

Agronomy 2020, 10(9), 1221; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091221
by Sirjan Sapkota 1,2,*, J. Lucas Boatwright 1,2, Kathleen Jordan 1, Richard Boyles 2,3 and Stephen Kresovich 1,2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Agronomy 2020, 10(9), 1221; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091221
Submission received: 4 July 2020 / Revised: 12 August 2020 / Accepted: 14 August 2020 / Published: 19 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Marker Technology for Crop Improvement)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

It was a real pleasure for me to go through this manuscript. It reads very well, indicative of the serious that authors put in its preparation. More importantly, the experimental design and the statistical methods are adequate and clearly presented.

Stacking ensemble methods are gaining ground in predictive analysis techniques such as machine learning to improve the overall accuracy of the predictors. Here, authors successfully implemented a stacking method for genomic prediction using a Bayesian approach. As expected, the stacking method (Bayesian multi-output regressor stacking) outperformed the single trait single environment models, since a stacking method by essence takes advantage of the correct predictions made by each single predictor. 

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

 

Thank you for your reviews and comments. We appreciate the time taken and effort made to improve our manuscript. We hope you all the best as well.

 

Sincerely,

Sirjan sapkota

Reviewer 2 Report

See attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

 

Thank you for your comments and suggestions. Please see the response in the file attached.

 

Sincerely,

Sirjan

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have addressed all my previous concerns and should be accepted as is.

Back to TopTop