Next Article in Journal
Effects of Different Microbial Inocula on Tomato Tolerance to Water Deficit
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Greenhouse Energy Requirements for Rose Cultivation in Europe and North Africa
Previous Article in Journal
Alleviation of Salinity Induced Oxidative Stress in Chenopodium quinoa by Fe Biofortification and Biochar—Endophyte Interaction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bioregulators Can Improve Biomass Production, Photosynthetic Efficiency, and Ornamental Quality of Gazania rigens L.
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 10
Issue 2
10.3390/agronomy10020169
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Edit a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Effects of Depolymerized Gellan with Different Molecular Weights on the Growth of Four Bedding Plant Species

by
Piotr Salachna
Department of Horticulture, West Pomeranian University of Technology, 3 Papieża Pawła VI Str., 71-459 Szczecin, Poland
Agronomy 2020, 10(2), 169; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020169
Received: 8 January 2020 / Revised: 16 January 2020 / Accepted: 22 January 2020 / Published: 24 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Quality in Ornamental Horticulture: Challenges and Perspectives)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
New solutions allowing for the shortening of the growing cycle and improvements in plant quality are constantly sought in order to improve the efficiency of bedding plant production under covers. Biodegradable polysaccharides and their derivatives have become increasingly popular in horticulture as plant growth promoters. A greenhouse pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of depolymerized gellan of different molecular weights (MW 56 kDa and 77 kDa) on the growth and physiological parameters of ornamental bedding plants Rudbeckia hirta L., Salvia splendens Sellow ex J.A. Schultes, Scabiosa atropurpurea L., and Tithonia rotundifolia (Mill.) S.F. Blake. The results showed that the application of depolymerized gellan accelerated flowering and stimulated the growth of all assessed species, regardless of MW. The plants treated with depolymerized gellan grew higher and had greater fresh weight of their above-ground parts, higher leaf relative chlorophyll content (SPAD; soil and plant analysis development), and higher stomatal conductance (gs). The use of 56 kDa gellan fraction resulted in the formation of inflorescences with the greatest fresh weight in S. atropurpurea. Leaves of R. hirta treated with this fraction showed the highest values of SPAD and gs. This study demonstrated that gellan derivatives of low MW may be used for the production of innovative plant biostimulants.

1. Introduction

Production of bedding plants, including annual, biennial, and perennial species, is one of the most important branches of the horticultural market. The sector has enjoyed dynamic growth due to a high public demand for ornamental plants and the increasing use of bedding plants in urban green areas. Standard and well-known species constitute the base of the bedding plant inventory and are being supplemented with new cultivars. Moreover, less common species are constantly being introduced to the market, as they are gaining popularity and can be sold at higher prices [1,2,3]. The sustainable development of floriculture requires modern and environmentally friendly solutions that can maximize the display of plant potential [4,5]. To this end, growers increasingly often use biostimulants that help to intensify plant propagation, growth, and flowering and improve stress tolerance [6,7,8]. Studies on the use of natural biostimulants in the cultivation of ornamental plants are considerably fewer than in the case of vegetables, fruits, and other crops [9,10], and this gap should be urgently filled.
Biostimulants comprise a wide and diverse group of plant growth improving compounds, including natural carbohydrate polymers and their derivatives [11,12]. The best known and widely tested biostimulating polysaccharides involve chitosan, alginate, and carrageenan [13,14,15]. They positively affect plant growth and flowering, improve plant stress resistance, and may serve as carriers of biologically active substances that further enhance their applicability. A number of research works indicated have that depolymerized forms of biostimulating polysaccharides exerted stronger effects on plant growth than their parent compounds [16,17,18,19,20]. This may be due to their low molecular weight (MW), which determines the biological activity of modified biopolymers [21,22].
Gellan gum is a natural extracellular polysaccharide produced during microbiological fermentation conducted by selected strains of Sphingomonas elodea, and is commonly used in food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical products [23]. Due to its gelling and stabilizing properties, it is also a popular component of plant tissue culture media [24]. Studies showed that high gellan gum concentrations improved in vitro germination frequencies in Pinus strobus L. embryos [25] and somatic embryo development in Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco [26]. In vivo application of native gellan gum and its derivative enhanced biomass growth, photosynthesis intensity, and mineral content in Eucomis bicolor L’Hér. and E. comosa Hort. ex Wehrh., with particularly strong stimulating effects of the depolymerized form of gellan gum with low MW [27]. Investigating plant response to gellan gum derivatives of different MW seems to be an interesting research challenge.
In this work, two depolymerized fractions of gellan gum of low MW were obtained and used as potential biostimulants in the cultivation of four species of bedding plants: Rudbeckia hirta L. (black-eyed Susan), Salvia splendens Sellow ex J.A. Schultes (scarlet sage), Scabiosa atropurpurea L. (sweet scabious), and Tithonia rotundifolia (Mill.) S.F. Blake (Mexican sunflower). S. splendens and R. hirta belong to the most popular ornamental plants used in flowerbeds and gardens, while S. atropurpurea and T. rotundifolia, being less known bedding plants, deserve greater attention due to their attractive inflorescences that remain decorative for a long time. The objective of this study was to check whether and how gellan derivatives of different MW affect plant growth, flowering, leaf relative chlorophyll content, and stomatal conductance (gs).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation and Determination of Depolymerized Gellan

Gellan fractions with low MW were prepared by acid hydrolysis. A solution of gellan gum (Sigma-Aldrich, Poznań, Poland) was prepared by dissolving 20 g in 800 mL of deionized water at 70 °C. Concentrated 36% HCl (Chempur, Piekary Śląskie, Poland) was added to reach a final concentration of 0.2 M. The solution was incubated at 70 °C for 4 or 16 h with stirring.
MW of the starting gellan gum and depolymerized fractions was determined by HPSEC using a S1000 pump, a S2300 refractive index detector, and a 20 µL sample loop (Knauer, Berlin, Germany). Separation was carried out using SUPREMA 10,000 Å 10 µm column (PSS, Mainz, Germany) eluted at a flow rate of 1 mL/min at 60 °C with 0.02% NaN3 and 10 mM of disodium edetate to avoid gellan aggregation. More information on obtaining gellan gum fractions and their characteristics is provided in an earlier work [27].

2.2. Plant Material and Experimental Design

Seeds of R. hirta, S. splendens cv. ‘Luna’, S. atropurpurea, and T. rotundifolia obtained from W. Legutko Breeding and Seed Company (Jutrosin, Poland) were sown on 15 March 2016 into plastic boxes filled with TS1 substrate (Kronen, Cerkwica, Poland). After four weeks, single seedlings matched for size were transplanted into round plastic pots (13 cm in diameter, 1.0 dm3 volume). The substrate consisted of deacidified peat (Kronen, Cerkwica, Poland), pH 6.1, supplemented with a multicomponent Hydrocomplex fertilizer (Yara International ASA, Oslo, Norway) at a dose of 3 g·dm−3, and containing 12% N (5% N-NO3 and 7% N-NH4), 11% P2O5, 18% K2O, 2.7% MgO, 8% S, 0.015% B, 0.2% Fe, 0.02% Mn, and 0.02% Zn. The plants were grown under natural photoperiod, on tables arranged in a heated glasshouse with ventilation (22/18 °C day/night), located at the premises of the West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin (53°25′44″ N, 14°33′10″ E).
The treatment with depolymerized gellan of different MW (56 kDa and 77 kDa) began a week after transplanting. The plants were drenched seven times every three days with aqueous solutions of gellan derivatives at a concentration of 100 mg/L (determined based on a preliminary trial). Each plant in the pot was drenched with 50 mL of the solution. Control plants were drenched with tap water. Each treatment included four replicates, and each experimental unit consisted of ten plants. Pots were arranged in a randomized complete block.
Daily observations enabled the determination of the number of days from sowing to the beginning of flowering, which was marked by the appearance of the first flowers in the inflorescences. At this stage, relative chlorophyll content, as determined according to the leaf greenness index SPAD (soil and plant analysis development, was measured using a chlorophyll meter SPAD 502 (Minolta, Osaka, Japan), and gs was measured with a SC1 porometer (Dekagon Devices, Pullman, WA, USA). The measurements involved two fully developed, representative leaves of five plants matched for size from each replicate. The measurements were repeated three times for each leaf, and the mean value was calculated. At full stage flowering, five plants matched for size from each replicate were cut off at the substrate line and compared for their height, fresh weight of the above-ground part, and fresh weight of fully open inflorescence.

2.3. Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

The results were checked for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test and analyzed individually for each species using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Statistica 13.3 package (TIBCO Software Inc. StatSoft, Cracow, Poland). The Tukey’s HSD test was employed to assess the significance between means, assuming a significance level of p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

Acid hydrolysis yielded degraded fractions of gellan gum of low MW. Figure 1 shows changes in the MW of depolymerized gum after hydrolysis. The starting gellan had MW of 1000 kDa, which dropped after 4 and 16 hours of hydrolysis to 77 kDa and 56 kDa, respectively.
The present data demonstrate that depolymerized gellan with low MW stimulated the growth and flowering of all species tested (Figure 2, Figure 3a,b). The plants treated with depolymerized gellan of MW 56 kDa and 77 kDa started flowering 4–5 days (R. hirta), 4–6 days (S. splendens), 6–7 days (S. atropurpurea), and 9–11 days (T. rotundifolia) earlier than the control plants. They were also 9.4–15.1% (R. hirta), 8.1–12.3% (S. splendens), 6.0–9.3% (S. atropurpurea), and 15.7–19.0% (T. rotundifolia) taller than non-treated plants. Gellan derivatives significantly increased the fresh weight of the above-ground parts of the assessed plants (Figure 4a). Following depolymerized gellan application, plants grew by 29.0–33.2% (R. hirta), 18.8–26.6% (S. splendens), 13.8–21.9% (S. atropurpurea), and 47.0-72.4% (T. rotundifolia). The MW of the derivatives had no effects on the flowering onset, height, and fresh weight of the above-ground parts.
The results showed that depolymerized gellan positively affected inflorescence fresh weight and the effect depended on the species and MW (Figure 4b). In R. hirta and S. splendens, drenching with depolymerized gellan of MW 56 kDa enhanced the fresh weight of the inflorescences by 17.5–28.0% and 21.8–38.6%, respectively. In the remaining species, both derivatives (i.e., of MW 56 kDa and 77 kDa) clearly stimulated plant growth by increasing inflorescence the fresh weight by 33.3–69.3% in S. atropurpurea and 71.7–83.3% in T. rotundifolia. In S. atropurpurea, the MW of the depolymerized gellan significantly affected inflorescence weight, and the effect was more pronounced for MW 56 kDa. Inflorescences of T. rotundifolia showed no significant differences in fresh weight depending on the depolymerized gellan MW.
Treatments with both gellan fractions of different MW enhanced relative leaf chlorophyll content (expressed as SPAD index) in all examined species (Figure 5a). SPAD in depolymerized gellan-treated plants was 7.9–21.5% (R. hirta), 17.0–17.7% (S. splendens), 13.3–21.0% (S. atropurpurea), and by 14.2–16.2% (T. rotundifolia) higher than in the control plants. In R. hirta, the effect of the stimulant on SPAD depended significantly on its MW. The depolymerized gellan of MW 56 kDa most effectively enhanced SPAD vs. the non-treated plants.
The biostimulant also enhanced gs by 47.4–62.1% in R. hirta, 46.5–94.6% in S. atropurpurea, 76.2–88.1% in S. splendens, and 17.8–26.7% in T. rotundifolia vs. the control plants (Figure 5b). In R. hirta and S. atropurpurea, gs depended on the gellan MW and was the highest in plants exposed to that of MW 56 kDa.

4. Discussion

This is the first study to compare the effects of depolymerized gellan of different MW on growth, flowering, and selected physiological parameters of four ornamental plants. It was observed that drenching with depolymerized gellan solution accelerated flowering in all tested species, and thus shortened the growing cycle in the greenhouse. These results confirmed the results of a previous study that showed that gellan gum and its derivatives may affect the course of plant developmental stages and advance flowering [27]. This may be due to the fact that plants treated with depolymerized gellan were quicker to reach minimum parameters of, for example, weight and height that allow for flowering [28,29]. The transition from vegetative to generative stage is a highly complex process regulated and controlled by phytohormones and other growth regulators and chemical compounds, including oligosaccharides, which serve as signal molecules [30,31,32]. So far, the role of depolymerized gellan and other biostimulants based on polysaccharide derivatives in the induction of plant flowering is unknown.
The data indicated that the depolymerized fractions of gellan stimulated plant growth, as manifested by their increased height, fresh weight of the above-ground parts, and inflorescences. Degraded gellan gum exerted similarly beneficial effects on the biomass growth of Perilla frutescens (L.) Britt. var. crispa f. purpurea exposed to salt stress [33]. Stimulating activity of depolymerized gellan on plant growth may be associated with the enhanced activity of basic physiological processes, including photosynthesis, as shown in studies on geophytes E. comosa and E. bicolor [27]. Plant biomass increment largely depends on an internal photosynthesis related factor, that is, the content of assimilation pigments. Another crucial aspect is the condition of stomata directly affecting carbon dioxide assimilation and transpiration [34,35,36]. The present data demonstrated that the application of depolymerized gellan enhanced gs and SPAD index (correlating with chlorophyll content), which might have eventually stimulated growth and intensified biomass accumulation.
Research studies [37,38] seem to agree that the biological activity of biopolymers depends on their structure and physical properties, particularly MW. For example, even a small change in chitooligomer MW may affect growth and physiological and biochemical processes in wheat seedlings [39]. This study showed no significant effects of MW of gellan gum derivatives on flowering time, height, and the fresh weight of the above-ground parts of the analyzed plants. However, significant differences were found for inflorescence fresh weight in S. atropurpurea and for physiological parameters in R. hirta, indicating a stronger stimulating effect of the depolymerized gellan of lower MW of 56 kDa. Other studies [21,40] also reported intensified biomass production and photosynthesis following treatment with low MW polysaccharide derivatives. Stronger biological activity of low MW biopolymers may be due to their faster and easier penetration into plant tissues and cells, where they bind with cell membrane receptors and initiate metabolic changes [16,18,21].
Studies to date have indicated that carbohydrate polymers may stimulate metabolism in plant systems, including stress response metabolism [15,20,22,31]. This is because the natural bioactive polymers are similar to biotic elicitors [41]. At the cellular level, elicitor perception by pattern-recognition receptors activate plant innate immunity [42,43]. Derivatives of gellan gum seem to act as plant elicitors, as under salinity stress they stimulate the synthesis of secondary metabolites [33]. It is therefore possible that gellan derivatives induce anti-stress protective mechanisms in plants. Improved tolerance to unfavorable environmental conditions may translate into more intense plant growth and their increased physiological activity. The biostimulating effects of gellan derivatives may also be associated with beneficial bacteria of the Sphingomonas genus and their ability to produce sphingans, exopolysaccharides related to gellan gum [44]. It has been proven that Sphingomonas sp. Cra20 positively affects the growth of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. and increases plant tolerance to drought stress [45]. Similarly, enhanced growth and improved chlorophyll contents were observed in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. inoculated with endophytic Sphingomonas sp. LK11 [46]. This study was an initial experiment, and the research will be continued in order to better understand the mechanism of gellan derivatives’ biostimulatory action.

5. Conclusions

Plant growth and development may be positively affected by using natural biostimulants. This study assessed the effects of depolymerized gellan of different MW (56 kDa and 77 kDa), yielded from gellan gum hydrolysis, on the growth and physiological parameters of four ornamental plants. Both gellan fractions positively affected growth, accelerated flowering, and increased the biomass of the above-ground parts. Depolymerized gellan triggered growth stimulation associated with enhanced relative content of chlorophyll and intensified gs. Depending on the species, oligomer MW differently affected inflorescence weight and physiological parameters. Gellan gum derivatives of low MW may be used in floriculture to shorten the production time and enhance the bedding plant quality.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

I gratefully acknowledge Marcin Soból, Rafał Piechocki, and Andżelika Byczyńska for their assistance in conducting this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Drew, J.; Yue, C.; Anderson, N.O.; Pardey, P.G. Premiums and discounts for plant patents and trademarks used on ornamental plant cultivars: a hedonic price analysis. HortScience 2015, 50, 879–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dominguez, G.B.; Mibus-Schoppe, H.; Sparke, K. Evaluation of existing research concerning sustainability in the value chain of ornamental plants. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. 2017, 6, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guo, Y.; Starman, T.; Hall, C. Growth, quality, and economic value responses of bedding plants to reduced water usage. HortScience 2019, 54, 856–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  4. Hall, T.J.; Dennis, J.H.; Lopez, R.G.; Marshall, M.I. Factors affecting growers’ willingness to adopt sustainable floriculture practices. HortScience 2009, 44, 1346–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lazzerini, G.; Merante, P.; Lucchetti, S.; Nicese, F.P. Assessing environmental sustainability of ornamental plant production: a nursery level approach in Pistoia District, Italy. Agroecol. Sust. Food 2018, 42, 911–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cirillo, C.; Rouphael, Y.; Pannico, A.; El-Nakhel, C.; Colla, G.; De Pascale, S. Application of protein hydrolysate-based biostimulant as new approach to improve performance of bedding plants. Acta Hortic. 2018, 1215, 443–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Toscano, S.; Romano, D.; Massa, D.; Bulgari, R.; Franzoni, G.; Ferrante, A. Biostimulant applications in low input horticultural cultivation systems. Italus Hortus 2018, 25, 27–36. [Google Scholar]
  8. Parađiković, N.; Teklić, T.; Zeljković, S.; Lisjak, M.; Špoljarević, M. Biostimulants research in some horticultural plant species—A review. Food Energy Secur. 2019, 8, e00162. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bulgari, R.; Cocetta, G.; Trivellini, A.; Vernieri, P.; Ferrante, A. Biostimulants and crop responses: a review. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 2015, 31, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bulgari, R.; Franzoni, G.; Ferrante, A. Biostimulants application in horticultural crops under abiotic stress conditions. Agronomy 2019, 9, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  11. Cabrera, J.C.; Wégria, G.; Onderwater, R.C.A.; González, G.; Nápoles, M.C.; Falcón-Rodríguez, A.B.; Costales, D.; Rogers, H.J.; Diosdado, E.; González, S.; et al. Practical use of oligosaccharins in agriculture. Acta Hortic. 2013, 1009, 195–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Merino, D.; Casalongué, C.; Alvarez, V.A. Polysaccharides as eco-nanomaterials for agricultural applications. In Handbook of Ecomaterials; Torres-Martínez, L.M., Kharissova, O.V., Kharisov, B.I., Eds.; Springer Nature: Basel, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 2709–2730. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ahmed, K.B.M.; Khan, M.M.A.; Siddiqui, H.; Jahan, A. Chitosan and its oligosaccharides, a promising option for sustainable crop production-a review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 17, 115331. [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu, J.; Yang, S.; Li, X.; Yan, Q.; Reaney, M.J.; Jiang, Z. Alginate oligosaccharides: Production, biological activities, and potential applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. F. 2019, 18, 1859–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  15. Shukla, P.S.; Borza, T.; Critchley, A.T.; Prithiviraj, B. Carrageenans from red seaweeds as promoters of growth and elicitors of defense response in plants. Front. Mar. Sci. 2016, 3, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ali, A.; Khan, M.M.A.; Uddin, M.; Naeem, M.; Idrees, M.; Hashmi, N.; Dar, T.A.; Varshney, L. Radiolytically depolymerized sodium alginate improves physiological activities, yield attributes and composition of essential oil of Eucalyptus citriodora Hook. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 112, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. El-Mohdy, H.L.A. Radiation-induced degradation of sodium alginate and its plant growth promotion effect. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  18. Ahmad, B.; Jahan, A.; Sadiq, Y.; Shabbir, A.; Jaleel, H.; Khan, M.M.A. Radiation mediated molecular weight reduction and structural modification in carrageenan potentiates improved photosynthesis and secondary metabolism in peppermint (Mentha piperita L.). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 124, 1069–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ahmed, K.B.M.; Khan, M.M.A.; Jahan, A.; Siddiqui, H.; Uddin, M. Gamma rays induced acquisition of structural modification in chitosan boosts photosynthetic machinery, enzymatic activities and essential oil production in citronella grass (Cymbopogon winterianus Jowitt). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 145, 372–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Naeem, M.; Nabi, A.; Aftab, T.; Khan, M.M.A. Oligomers of carrageenan regulate functional activities and artemisinin production in Artemisia annua L. exposed to arsenic stress. Protoplasma 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dzung, P.D.; Phu, D.V.; Du, B.D.; Ngoc, L.S.; Duy, N.N.; Hiet, H.D.; Hien, N.Q. Effect of foliar application of oligochitosan with different molecular weight on growth promotion and fruit yield enhancement of chili plant. Plant Prod. Sci. 2017, 20, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Muley, A.B.; Shingote, P.R.; Patil, A.P.; Dalvi, S.G.; Suprasanna, P. Gamma radiation degradation of chitosan for application in growth promotion and induction of stress tolerance in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 210, 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Muthukumar, T.; Song, J.E.; Khang, G. Biological role of gellan gum in improving scaffold drug delivery, cell adhesion properties for tissue engineering applications. Molecules 2019, 24, 4514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  24. Nakano, M.; Hosokawa, K.; Oomiya, T.; Yamamura, S. Plant regeneration from protoplasts of Gentiana by embedding protoplasts in gellan gum. Plant Cell Tiss.Org. 1995, 41, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Klimaszewska, K.; Smith, D.R. Maturation of somatic embryos of Pinus strobus is promoted by a high concentration of gellan gum. Physiol. Plant. 1997, 100, 949–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lelu-Walter, M.A.; Gautier, F.; Eliášová, K.; Sanchez, L.; Teyssier, C.; Lomenech, A.M.; Le Metté, C.; Hargreaves, C.; Trontin, J.F.; Reeves, C. High gellan gum concentration and secondary somatic embryogenesis: Two key factors to improve somatic embryo development in Pseudotsuga menziesii Mirb. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 2017, 132, 137–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Salachna, P.; Mizielińska, M.; Soból, M. Exopolysaccharide gellan gum and derived oligo-gellan enhance growth and antimicrobial activity in Eucomis plants. Polymers 2018, 10, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  28. Ollerton, J.; Lack, A. Relationships between flowering phenology, plant size and reproductive success in shape Lotus corniculatus (Fabaceae). Plant Ecol. 1998, 139, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bolmgren, K.D. Cowan, P. Time–size tradeoffs: A phylogenetic comparative study of flowering time, plant height and seed mass in a north-temperate flora. Oikos 2008, 117, 424–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Marfà, V.; Gollin, D.J.; Eberhard, S.; Mohnen, D.; Dan/ill, A.; Albersheim, P. Oligogalacturonides are able to induce flowers to form on tobacco explants. Plant J. 1991, 1, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Darvill, A.; Augur, C.; Bergmann, C.; Carlson, R.W.; Cheong, J.J.; Eberhard, S.; Hahn, M.G.; Lo, V.M.; Marfa, V.; Meyer, B.; et al. Oligosaccharins- oligosaccharides that regulate growth, development and defence responses in plants. Glycobiology 1992, 2, 181–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. John, M.; Röhrig, H.; Schmidt, J.; Walden, R.; Schell, J. Cell signalling by oligosaccharides. Trends Plant Sci. 1997, 2, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Salachna, P.; Grzeszczuk, M.; Meller, E.; Mizielińska, M. Effects of gellan oligosaccharide and NaCl stress on growth, photosynthetic pigments, mineral composition, antioxidant capacity and antimicrobial activity in red perilla. Molecules 2019, 24, 3925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  34. Reddy, A.R.; Das, V.S.R. Correlation between biomass production and net photosynthetic rates and kinetic properties of RuBP carboxylase in certain C3 plants. Biomass 1986, 10, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, Z.; Tao, X.; Khan, A.; Tan, D.K.; Luo, H. Biomass accumulation, photosynthetic traits and root development of cotton as affected by irrigation and nitrogen-fertilization. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  36. Roche, D. Stomatal conductance is essential for higher yield potential of C3 crops. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2015, 34, 429–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sun, L.; Wang, C.; Shi, Q.; Ma, C. Preparation of different molecular weight polysaccharides from Porphyridium cruentum and their antioxidant activities. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2009, 45, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zou, P.; Yang, X.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Yu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, G. Advances in characterisation and biological activities of chitosan and chitosan oligosaccharides. Food Chem. 2016, 190, 1174–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, X.; Li, K.; Liu, S.; Zou, P.; Xing, R.; Yu, H.; Li, P. Relationship between the degree of polymerization of chitooligomers and their activity affecting the growth of wheat seedlings under salt stress. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 501–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Salachna, P.; Grzeszczuk, M.; Meller, E.; Soból, M. Oligo-alginate with low molecular mass improves growth and physiological activity of Eucomis autumnalis under salinity stress. Molecules 2018, 23, 812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  41. Zheng, F.; Chen, L.; Zhang, P.; Zhou, J.; Lu, X.; Tian, W. Carbohydrate polymers exhibit great potential as effective elicitors in organic agriculture: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 230, 115637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Boller, T.; Felix, G. A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2009, 60, 379–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Saijo, Y.; Loo, E.P.I. Plant immunity in signal integration between biotic and abiotic stress responses. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 87–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  44. Huang, H.; Liu, Y.; Liu, R. Sphingomonas sp.: An important microbial resource for biopolymer synthesis. Acta Microbiol. Sin. 2009, 49, 560–566. [Google Scholar]
  45. Luo, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhou, M.; Sheng, H.M. Sphingomonas sp. Cra20 increases plant growth rate and alters rhizosphere microbial community structure of Arabidopsis thaliana under drought stress. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  46. Khan, A.L.; Waqas, M.; Kang, S.M.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Hussain, J.; Al-Rawahi, A.; Al-Khiziri, S.; Ullah, I.; Ali, L.; Jung, H.Y.; et al. Bacterial endophyte Sphingomonas sp. LK11 produces gibberellins and IAA and promotes tomato plant growth. J. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 689–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agronomy 10 00169 g001 550
Figure 1. The molecular weight distribution of gellan gum and depolymerized gellan (DG) after 4 and 16 hours of hydrolysis.
Figure 1. The molecular weight distribution of gellan gum and depolymerized gellan (DG) after 4 and 16 hours of hydrolysis.
Agronomy 10 00169 g001
Agronomy 10 00169 g002 550
Figure 2. Physical appearance at week 10 from the sowing of four bedding plant species treated with depolymerized gellan (DG) with different molecular weights (MW 56 kDa and 77 kDa); left to right: untreated control, DG 56 kDa, and DG 77 kDa.
Figure 2. Physical appearance at week 10 from the sowing of four bedding plant species treated with depolymerized gellan (DG) with different molecular weights (MW 56 kDa and 77 kDa); left to right: untreated control, DG 56 kDa, and DG 77 kDa.
Agronomy 10 00169 g002
Agronomy 10 00169 g003a 550Agronomy 10 00169 g003b 550
Figure 3. Days to anthesis (a) and plant height (b) of bedding plants treated with depolymerized gellan (DG) with different molecular weights (MW 56 kDa and 77 kDa). Each treatment included four replicates and the values shown are the mean ± SEM. Columns labeled with the same letters are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 3. Days to anthesis (a) and plant height (b) of bedding plants treated with depolymerized gellan (DG) with different molecular weights (MW 56 kDa and 77 kDa). Each treatment included four replicates and the values shown are the mean ± SEM. Columns labeled with the same letters are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Agronomy 10 00169 g003aAgronomy 10 00169 g003b
Agronomy 10 00169 g004a 550Agronomy 10 00169 g004b 550
Figure 4. The effects of depolymerized gellan (DG) with different molecular weights (MW 56 kDa and 77 kDa) on the fresh weight (FW) of the above-ground parts (a) and inflorescence (b) of greenhouse-grown bedding plants. Data represent the values at full stage flowering. Each treatment included four replicates and the values shown are the mean ± SEM. Columns labeled with the same letters are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 4. The effects of depolymerized gellan (DG) with different molecular weights (MW 56 kDa and 77 kDa) on the fresh weight (FW) of the above-ground parts (a) and inflorescence (b) of greenhouse-grown bedding plants. Data represent the values at full stage flowering. Each treatment included four replicates and the values shown are the mean ± SEM. Columns labeled with the same letters are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Agronomy 10 00169 g004aAgronomy 10 00169 g004b
Agronomy 10 00169 g005a 550Agronomy 10 00169 g005b 550
Figure 5. The effects of depolymerized gellan (DG) with different molecular weights (MW 56 kDa and 77 kDa) on relative chlorophyll content-SPAD (soil and plant analysis development) index (a) and stomatal conductance (b) of greenhouse-grown bedding plants. Data represent the values at early stage flowering. Each treatment included four replicates and the values shown are the mean ± SEM. Columns labeled with the same letters are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 5. The effects of depolymerized gellan (DG) with different molecular weights (MW 56 kDa and 77 kDa) on relative chlorophyll content-SPAD (soil and plant analysis development) index (a) and stomatal conductance (b) of greenhouse-grown bedding plants. Data represent the values at early stage flowering. Each treatment included four replicates and the values shown are the mean ± SEM. Columns labeled with the same letters are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Agronomy 10 00169 g005aAgronomy 10 00169 g005b

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Salachna, P. Effects of Depolymerized Gellan with Different Molecular Weights on the Growth of Four Bedding Plant Species. Agronomy 2020, 10, 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020169

AMA Style

Salachna P. Effects of Depolymerized Gellan with Different Molecular Weights on the Growth of Four Bedding Plant Species. Agronomy. 2020; 10(2):169. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020169

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salachna, Piotr. 2020. "Effects of Depolymerized Gellan with Different Molecular Weights on the Growth of Four Bedding Plant Species" Agronomy 10, no. 2: 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020169

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop