Optimization of Flocculation/Coagulation Conditions of Coal Preparation Plant Tailings Using Chitosan and FeCl3 Through Experimental Design
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Methods
2.2.1. Zeta Potential Analyses
2.2.2. Flocculation Experiments
2.2.3. Multivariate Experimental Design
3. Results
3.1. Zeta Potential Studies
3.2. Flocculation Studies
3.3. Response Optimization
3.4. Structural Features and Morphology of Flocs
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| FeCl3 | Ferric chloride |
| RSM | Response Surface Methodology |
| R2 | Coefficient of determination |
| PAC | Polyaluminum chloride |
| CMC | Carboxymethyl cellulose |
| –NH2 | Amino |
| –OH | Hydroxyl |
| DOE | Experimental design |
| NaOH | Sodium hydroxide |
| HCl | Hydrochloric acid |
| ζ-potential | Zeta potential |
| NaCl | Sodium chloride |
| NTU | Nephelometric turbidity unit |
| ANOVA | Analysis of variance |
References
- Cheng, G.; Peng, Y.; Duan, P.; Li, E.; Lv, C.; Wang, X.; Cheng, F. Sustainable desulfurization of fine high-sulfur coal via flotation-electrochemical method. Miner. Eng. 2025, 233, 109571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, G.; Guo, R.; Gao, P.; Xu, C.; Duan, P.; Zhang, Z.; Deng, X.; Yan, K.; Cheng, F. Research on surface hydrophobic modification and flotation decarbonization of coal gasification fine slag. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 529, 172241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International Energy Agency. Coal Supply. 2024. Available online: https://www.iea.org/countries/turkiye/coal (accessed on 25 February 2026).
- T.C. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar. Coal Statistics. 2024. Available online: https://enerji.gov.tr/bilgimerkezi-tabiikaynaklar-komur (accessed on 25 February 2026).
- Ufuk, A. Türkiye Electricity Review 2025. Available online: https://ember-energy.org/app/uploads/2025/03/Turkiye-Electricity-Review-2025_11032025.pdf (accessed on 25 February 2026).
- CEIC Data. Turkey Coal Production Statistics 1981–2025. 2025. Available online: https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/turkey/coal-production (accessed on 25 February 2026).
- Fu, Y.; Li, H.; Mei, H.; Feng, Z.; Chen, R.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Fu, W. Organic contaminant removal with no adsorbent recycling based on microstructure modification in coal slime filtration. Fuel 2021, 288, 119630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, M.; Ma, X.; Dong, X.; Fan, Y.; Chen, R. The synergistic effects of Al3+ and chitosan on the solid–liquid separation of coal wastewater and their mechanism of action. Polymers 2022, 14, 3970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huapaya, K.; Grisales, J.; Botero, Y.; Salamanca, A.; Lara, P.; Cisternas, L.A.; Jeldres, R.; Jeison, D.; Panico, A.; Zapata, M.; et al. Clays tailings flocculation using bio-based flocculants from Nannochloropsis gaditana. J. Appl. Phycol. 2025, 37, 3501–3512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, J.; Xue, J.; Liang, S.; Zhao, W.; Li, Z. Flocculation performance and interfacial adsorption mechanism of aluminum hydroxide–polyacrylamide in coal slime water treatment. Polymers 2026, 18, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tayeb, A.M.; Othman, R.H.; Barakat, N.A.; Monazie, A.M.; Mahmoud, M.A. Optimization and characterization of mushroom-derived flocculants for reducing turbidity in clay suspensions. Discov. Sustain. 2025, 6, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khatibi, S. Studies on Flocculation of Fine Mineral Tailings Using Novel Polyacrylamide-Based Polymer. Ph.D. Thesis, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, Z.; Li, P.; Hou, D.; Kuang, Y.; Wang, G. Aggregation mechanism of particles: Effect of Ca2+ and polyacrylamide on coagulation and flocculation of coal slime water containing illite. Minerals 2017, 7, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, W.; Gong, L.; Huang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, C.; Zeng, H. Adsorption of hydrophobically modified polyacrylamide on model coal and clay surfaces and the effect on selective flocculation of fine coal. Miner. Eng. 2019, 142, 105887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, C.; Li, S.; Li, X.; Liang, Y.; Sarfaraz, K. Synthesis of hydrophobic cationic polyacrylamide initiated by ultrasonic irradiation and its flocculation performance in coal mine wastewater. Processes 2020, 8, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maria, A.; Mayasari, E.; Irawati, U.; Zulfikurrahman. Comparing the effectiveness of chitosan and conventional coagulants for coal wastewater treatment. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2020; Volume 980, p. 012077. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, S.; Ma, H.; Gao, N.; Qiao, Y. Enhanced flocculation performance of coal slurry water using a starch-based flocculant with rich charges and its mechanism. J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 381, 125112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, Y.; Zhang, H.; Pan, G. Flocculation of cyanobacterial cells using coal fly ash modified chitosan. Water Res. 2016, 97, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, N.; Fan, Y.; Dong, X.; Ma, X.; Chen, R.; Chang, M.; Xu, G. Synthesis and characterization of a guar gum-based flocculant and its flocculation–dewatering mechanism in coal mine wastewater. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 308, 142438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tharunkumar, J.; Parsanathan, R.; Phillip, N.; Rakesh, S. Response surface methodology for optimizing flocculation efficiency of chitosan and inorganic flocculants in microalgae and yeast cultures. Biomass Bioenergy 2025, 202, 108222. [Google Scholar]
- El-Taweel, R.M.; Mohamed, N.; Alrefaey, K.A.; Husien, S.; Abdel-Aziz, A.B.; Salim, A.I.; Radwan, A.G. A review of coagulation explaining its definition, mechanism, coagulant types, and optimization models (RSM and ANN). Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 2023, 6, 100358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahto, A.; Mishra, S. Guar gum grafted itaconic acid: A solution for different wastewater treatment. J. Polym. Environ. 2021, 29, 3525–3538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehta, A.; Aryan, A.; Pandey, J.P.; Sen, G. Synthesis of a novel water-soluble graft copolymer for mineral ore beneficiation and river water treatment towards drinking water augmentation. ChemistrySelect 2022, 7, e202103289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurniawan, S.B.; Imron, M.F.; Chik, C.E.N.C.E.; Owodunni, A.A.; Ahmad, A.; Alnawajha, M.M.; Rahim, N.F.M.; Said, N.S.M.; Abdullah, S.R.S.; Kasan, N.A.; et al. What compound inside biocoagulants/bioflocculants contributes most to coagulation and flocculation processes? Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 806, 150902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, R.; Zou, W.; Wang, T.; Huang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, C. Adsorption and interaction mechanisms of Chi-g-P(AM-DMDAAC) assisted settling of kaolinite in a two-step flocculation process. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 816, 151576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.S.; Robinson, J.; Chong, M.F. A review on application of flocculants in wastewater treatment. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2014, 92, 489–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razali, M.A.A.; Ahmad, Z.; Ahmad, M.S.B.; Ariffin, A. Treatment of pulp and paper mill wastewater with various molecular weight of polyDADMAC induced flocculation. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 166, 529–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Jing, R.; He, S.; Qian, J.; Zhang, K.; Ma, G.; Chang, X.; Zhang, M.; Li, Y. Coagulation of low-temperature and low-turbidity water: Adjusting basicity of polyaluminum chloride (PAC) and using chitosan as coagulant aid. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 206, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aarab, I.; Derqaoui, M.; Amari, K.E.; Yaacoubi, A.; Abidi, A.; Etahiri, A.; Bacaoui, A. Flotation tendency assessment through DOE: Case of low-grade Moroccan phosphate ore. Min. Metall. Explor. 2022, 39, 1721–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golaghaei, F.; Mohadesi, A.; Ataei, S.A.; Karimi, M.A.; Torabi, M. Optimizing the leaching conditions of chalcopyrite/pyrite concentrate in Sarcheshmeh Copper Complex using response surface methodology. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2024, 211, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demirkıran, N.; Şenel, M.; Özdemir, G.D.T. Optimization by response surface methodology of dissolution of metallic zinc obtained from waste zinc–carbon batteries in nitric acid solutions. Rev. Metal. 2021, 57, e189. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, H.A.M.; El-Midany, A.A.; Abdel-Khalek, N.A. Statistical optimisation of parameters affecting flocculation of Egyptian iron ore. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. 2007, 116, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Bhattacharya, S.; Mandre, N.R. Characterization and flocculation studies of fine coal tailings. J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 2014, 114, 945–949. [Google Scholar]
- Seidel, K.; Arnold, B. A review: Hydrophobicity and surface charge of coals and coal-associated minerals. MATEC Web Conf. 2015, 416, 05006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Som, A.M.; Ramlee, A.A.; Puasa, S.W.; Hamid, H.A.A. Optimisation of operating conditions during coagulation–flocculation process in industrial wastewater treatment using Hylocereus undatus foliage through response surface methodology. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 17108–17121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adachi, Y.; Kobayashi, A.; Kobayashi, M. Structure of colloidal flocs in relation to the dynamic properties of unstable suspension. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2012, 2012, 574878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolto, B.; Gregory, J. Organic polyelectrolytes in water treatment. Water Res. 2007, 41, 2301–2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, B.; Peng, J.; Zhu, X.; Huang, W. The settling behavior of quartz using chitosan as flocculant. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2017, 6, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsafasfeh, A.; Alagha, L.; Alzidaneen, A.; Nadendla, V.S.S. Optimization of flotation efficiency of phosphate minerals in mine tailings using polymeric depressants: Experiments and machine learning. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2022, 58, 150477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López-Maldonado, E.A.; Oropeza-Guzman, M.T.; Jurado-Baizaval, J.L.; Ochoa-Terán, A. Coagulation–flocculation mechanisms in wastewater treatment plants through zeta potential measurements. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 279, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meraz, K.A.S.; Vargas, S.M.P.; Maldonado, J.T.L.; Bravo, J.M.C.; Guzman, M.T.O.; Maldonado, E.A.L. Eco-friendly innovation for nejayote coagulation–flocculation process using chitosan: Evaluation through zeta potential measurements. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 284, 536–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Besra, L.; Sengupta, D.K.; Roy, S.K. Particle characteristics and their influence on dewatering of kaolin, calcite and quartz suspensions. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2000, 59, 89–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatsungnoen, T.; Chisti, Y. Flocculation and electroflocculation for algal biomass recovery. In Biofuels from Algae, 2nd ed.; Pandey, A., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 257–286. [Google Scholar]
- Bhalkaran, S.; Wilson, L.D. Investigation of self-assembly processes for chitosan-based coagulant–flocculant systems: A mini-review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Renault, F.; Sancey, B.; Badot, P.M.; Crini, G. Chitosan for coagulation–flocculation processes: An eco-friendly approach. Eur. Polym. J. 2009, 45, 1337–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guibal, E.; Roussy, J. Coagulation and flocculation of dye-containing solutions using a biopolymer (chitosan). React. Funct. Polym. 2007, 67, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szyguła, A.; Guibal, E.; Palacin, M.A.; Ruiz, M.; Sastre, A.M. Removal of an anionic dye (Acid Blue 92) by coagulation–flocculation using chitosan. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 2979–2986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taner, H.A. Dewatering of chromite ore plant tailings using carboxymethyl cellulose and chitosan as flocculants. Dry. Technol. 2025, 43, 1507–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Shang, Y.; Huang, X.; Chen, A.; Yang, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Cai, J.; Gu, W.; Qian, X.; Yang, H.; et al. Preparation of strong cationic chitosan-graft-polyacrylamide flocculants and their flocculating properties. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 7141–7149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.; Teng, Q.; Han, Y.; Zhang, G.; Fang, S. New insights into the combination of Fe (III) and xanthan gum in dewatering of coal slurry: Molecular self-assembly. Fuel 2023, 332, 126205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]











| Composition | Al2O3 | CaO | Cr2O3 | Fe2O3 | K2O | MgO | Na2O | P2O5 | SO3 | SiO2 | TiO2 | LOI * |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content, % | 13.78 | 5.48 | 0.05 | 7.73 | 2.62 | 3.21 | 1.20 | 0.09 | 1.04 | 37.78 | 0.75 | 26.12 |
| Proximate Analysis (wt.%, Dry Basis) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Moisture | Ash | Volatile Matter | Fixed Carbon | |
| Sample | 3.32 | 73.65 | 22.02 | 1.01 |
| Coded Variables | Factors | Levels |
|---|---|---|
| A | Chitosan dosage, g/t | 0, 100 and 200 |
| B | FeCl3 dosage, g/t | 0, 250 and 500 |
| C | pH | 5, 8 and 11 |
| D | Stirring speed, rpm | 250, 500 and 750 |
| E | Pulp density, % | 5, 10 and 15 |
| Run no | Independent Variable In Coded Form | Independent Variable in Actual Form | Responses | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | E | A | B | C | D | E | Turbidity (NTU) | Water Rec. (%) | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 100 | 250 | 8 | 250 | 10 | 306.5 | 46.07 |
| 2 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 750 | 15 | 6015 | 1.72 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 250 | 5 | 500 | 10 | 31.6 | 41.88 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 250 | 8 | 500 | 10 | 393.5 | 39.37 |
| 5 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 500 | 11 | 750 | 5 | 2012.5 | 2.86 |
| 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 250 | 8 | 500 | 10 | 47.05 | 36.85 |
| 7 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 500 | 5 | 250 | 5 | 1360 | 67.10 |
| 8 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 500 | 5 | 750 | 15 | 1500 | 8.58 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 250 | 8 | 500 | 10 | 406.5 | 49.42 |
| 10 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 200 | 0 | 11 | 250 | 15 | 6370 | 2.57 |
| 11 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 200 | 0 | 11 | 750 | 5 | 555 | 61.38 |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100 | 250 | 8 | 750 | 10 | 306 | 41.88 |
| 13 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 500 | 11 | 250 | 15 | 6485 | 2.14 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 250 | 8 | 500 | 10 | 206 | 46.90 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 250 | 8 | 500 | 10 | 357.5 | 44.39 |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 200 | 500 | 5 | 250 | 15 | 56.25 | 38.60 |
| 17 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 200 | 500 | 11 | 250 | 5 | 569.5 | 66.29 |
| 18 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 750 | 5 | 570.5 | 57.28 |
| 19 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 250 | 5 | 2600 | 2.46 |
| 20 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 200 | 0 | 5 | 750 | 15 | 100.7 | 12.01 |
| 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 100 | 250 | 8 | 500 | 5 | 74.75 | 81.43 |
| 22 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 200 | 0 | 5 | 250 | 5 | 21.65 | 69.56 |
| 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 250 | 8 | 500 | 10 | 391.5 | 45.23 |
| 24 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 500 | 8 | 500 | 10 | 210.5 | 45.23 |
| 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100 | 250 | 8 | 500 | 15 | 596 | 14.15 |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 250 | 11 | 500 | 10 | 5125 | 0.84 |
| 27 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 8 | 500 | 10 | 522.5 | 46.90 |
| 28 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 250 | 15 | 745 | 10.29 |
| 29 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 200 | 500 | 11 | 750 | 15 | 5980 | 2.14 |
| 30 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 250 | 8 | 500 | 10 | 1749 | 4.19 |
| 31 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 200 | 500 | 5 | 750 | 5 | 15.25 | 71.20 |
| 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 250 | 8 | 500 | 10 | 318 | 44.39 |
| Response | Turbidity | Water Recovery | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source of Variation | Df 1 | Mean Square | F Value | p Value | Remarks | Mean Square | F Value | p Value | Remarks |
| A | 1 | 4,827,351 | 14.56 | 0.003 | Significant | 2311.26 | 33.4 | 0.000 | Significant |
| B | 1 | 26,346 | 0.08 | 0.783 | 88.77 | 1.28 | 0.281 | ||
| C | 1 | 54,465,676 | 164.3 | 0.000 | Significant | 3044.6 | 43.99 | 0.000 | Significant |
| D | 1 | 118,253 | 0.36 | 0.562 | 117.73 | 1.7 | 0.219 | ||
| E | 1 | 22,375,385 | 67.49 | 0.000 | Significant | 8335.57 | 120.4 | 0.000 | Significant |
| A2 | 1 | 297,641 | 0.90 | 0.364 | 776.91 | 11.23 | 0.006 | Significant | |
| B2 | 1 | 83,078 | 0.25 | 0.627 | 148.84 | 2.15 | 0.171 | ||
| C2 | 1 | 10,121,263 | 30.53 | 0.000 | Significant | 705.40 | 10.19 | 0.009 | Significant |
| D2 | 1 | 146,494 | 0.44 | 0.52 | 79.48 | 1.15 | 0.307 | ||
| E2 | 1 | 113,608 | 0.34 | 0.57 | 222.09 | 3.21 | 0.101 | ||
| AB | 1 | 214,683 | 0.65 | 0.438 | 35.29 | 0.51 | 0.49 | ||
| AC | 1 | 7381 | 0.02 | 0.884 | 352.49 | 5.09 | 0.045 | Significant | |
| AD | 1 | 32,901 | 0.10 | 0.759 | 21.94 | 0.32 | 0.585 | ||
| AE | 1 | 617,621 | 1.86 | 0.200 | 703.81 | 10.17 | 0.009 | Significant | |
| BC | 1 | 246,672 | 0.74 | 0.407 | 60.1 | 0.87 | 0.371 | ||
| BD | 1 | 779,885 | 2.35 | 0.153 | 1170.55 | 16.91 | 0.002 | Significant | |
| BE | 1 | 21,058 | 0.06 | 0.806 | 4.1 | 0.06 | 0.812 | ||
| CD | 1 | 134,239 | 0.40 | 0.538 | 60.56 | 0.88 | 0.37 | ||
| CE | 1 | 21,805,269 | 65.77 | 0.000 | Significant | 317.44 | 4.59 | 0.055 | |
| DE | 1 | 111,782 | 0.34 | 0.573 | 16.97 | 0.25 | 0.63 | ||
| Error | 11 | 331,544 | 69.21 | ||||||
| Total | 31 | 135,827,668 | 19,782.9 | ||||||
| Factors | Turbidity (NTU) | Water Recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|
| A | 0.798 | 0.515 |
| B | −1 | 1 |
| C | −0.152 | −0.556 |
| D | 1 | −1 |
| E | −1 | −1 |
| Response | 9.86 | 76.92 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Taner, H.A.; Nyanswe, A.H. Optimization of Flocculation/Coagulation Conditions of Coal Preparation Plant Tailings Using Chitosan and FeCl3 Through Experimental Design. Polymers 2026, 18, 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18060687
Taner HA, Nyanswe AH. Optimization of Flocculation/Coagulation Conditions of Coal Preparation Plant Tailings Using Chitosan and FeCl3 Through Experimental Design. Polymers. 2026; 18(6):687. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18060687
Chicago/Turabian StyleTaner, Hasan Ali, and Augustino Henry Nyanswe. 2026. "Optimization of Flocculation/Coagulation Conditions of Coal Preparation Plant Tailings Using Chitosan and FeCl3 Through Experimental Design" Polymers 18, no. 6: 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18060687
APA StyleTaner, H. A., & Nyanswe, A. H. (2026). Optimization of Flocculation/Coagulation Conditions of Coal Preparation Plant Tailings Using Chitosan and FeCl3 Through Experimental Design. Polymers, 18(6), 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18060687

