Next Article in Journal
Viscosity Characteristics of Cationic Polyacrylamide Aqueous Solutions
Next Article in Special Issue
Advances in Functional Rubber and Elastomer Composites, 3rd Edition
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing Hydration Stability and Proton Transport in Nafion/SiO2 Membranes for Medium- to High-Temperature PEMFCs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Silicon Effect on Conductive Behavior in Rubber Recycled Composites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Oil- and Fuel-Resistant Rubber for Pressure Hoses Containing Carbon-Based Technological Waste as a Filler

1
Institute of Polymers, Kazan National Research Technological University, 68 K. Marx Str., 420015 Kazan, Russia
2
Center of Physico-Chemical Methods of Research and Analysis, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Al-Farabi Ave., 71, 050040 Almaty, Kazakhstan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2026, 18(3), 330; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18030330
Submission received: 11 December 2025 / Revised: 22 January 2026 / Accepted: 23 January 2026 / Published: 26 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Functional Rubber and Elastomer Composites, 3rd Edition)

Abstract

Carbon-enriched concentrates based on shungite ore from rare-metal mining waste were obtained, and their effect on the properties of oil- and fuel-resistant carbon-black-filled rubber used for the production of pressure hoses was investigated. The shungite concentrates were produced by flotation followed by acid activation. A blend of nitrile butadiene rubber and butadiene–α-methylstyrene rubber was used as the elastomeric base. Carbon black was partially replaced with shungite fillers (5–15 phr). The presence of shungite was found to prolong both the scorch time and the optimum cure time of the rubber compounds, likely due to oxide impurities that interfere with the vulcanization activation process. Replacing carbon black with shungite ore and its flotation concentrate in the rubber formulations resulted in a decrease in Mooney viscosity compared to the samples without shungite fillers. Acid-activated shungite concentrate at contents above 5 phr increases the viscosity of the rubber compound. It was found that acid-activated shungite concentrate provides high tensile strength and excellent thermo-oxidative stability of the rubber, whereas the use of shungite ore above 5 phr reduces the tensile strength and causes significant changes in tensile properties upon thermo-oxidation. When exposed in oil, rubbers containing shungite fillers retain their mechanical properties, with the best resistance in hydrocarbon media observed for the rubber filled with acid-activated shungite concentrate.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Dispersed fillers are widely used to enhance the performance of polymer composites, enabling the adjustment of their mechanical, dielectric, and thermal properties [1,2]. Carbon black remains the most widely used filler [3]; however, its capabilities are largely exhausted [4]. Moreover, the use of carbon black to achieve the desired performance properties is limited by environmental concerns associated with its production [3]. Consequently, there is active research into alternative dispersed fillers, including naturally occurring ones [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Carbon-containing minerals, particularly shungite, are considered promising candidates [13]. Incorporating such fillers can reduce the cost of rubbers while maintaining or even improving their performance properties [14,15,16,17,18,19].
Shungite is a mineral rock composed of amorphous carbon and silicate minerals [20,21,22]. It is characterized by a unique nanostructure with fullerene-like formations [23,24,25], which confer high chemical and adsorption activity. Reference [26] demonstrated that the addition of 10–20 parts per hundred rubber (phr) of shungite to a nitrile butadiene rubber formulation increases tensile strength and elongation at break. Partial replacement of carbon black with shungite filler also improves the processing properties of the rubber compound, as well as the frost resistance and thermal stability of the vulcanizates [27,28]. Study [29] showed that shungite imparts light-protective and bactericidal properties to polymer composites.
Nevertheless, practical use of shungite is associated with challenges, including considerable variations in carbon content, a high fraction of mineral impurities, and difficulties in achieving uniform particle dispersion within the polymer matrix [30,31]. Previous studies [26,32] have highlighted the role of shungite composition and demonstrated that carbon enrichment positively affects its effectiveness in rubber applications [33]. Physical and chemical methods are used to enrich natural shungite with carbon and remove mineral impurities [34,35]. In particular, flotation increases the carbon content and specific surface area of the filler [36,37], while alkali and acid activation reduces the amount of mineral impurities, including pyrite, and enhances the filler’s adhesion properties [38].
The analysis of changes in the aforementioned properties associated with the use of shungite-based fillers contributes to the valorization of technogenic waste and enables the determination of the optimal filler type and loading level.
The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of shungite ore from waste dumps of rare-metal mining (the Bakyrchik deposit, Eastern Kazakhstan, Kyzyl zone), its carbon-enriched concentrate obtained by flotation, and an acid-activated shungite concentrate on the physical-mechanical properties and thermal stability of oil- and fuel-resistant rubber. The scientific novelty of this work lies in substantiating the feasibility of using technogenic shungite waste, purposefully modified by flotation and acid activation, to increase the carbon fraction of the filler and reduce its mineral fraction. This approach enables controlled modification of the vulcanization characteristics of rubber compounds, the physical-mechanical properties, and the thermo-oxidative stability of oil- and fuel-resistant elastomeric composites when carbon black is partially replaced.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

A polymer matrix consisting of nitrile butadiene rubbers of BNKS-18 AMN and BNKS-28 AMN grades (Technical Conditions TU 38.30313-2006, 2nd group, Krasnoyarsk Synthetic Rubber Plant JSC, Krasnoyarsk, Russia) and butadiene–α-methylstyrene rubber of SBR-1705 HI-AR grade (grade 1, group 1, State Standard GOST 11138-2019 [39], Omsk Rubber Plant JSC, Omsk, Russia) was used. Technical sulfur (grade 9995, 1st class, SERA CJSC, Orenburg, Russia) was used as a vulcanizing agent. Benzothiazole disulfide (MBTS, 2,2′-dithiobis(benzothiazole), State Standard GOST 7087-75 [40], BINA Group LLC, Moscow, Russia) served as vulcanization accelerator. Zinc oxide (ZnO, grade A, Empils-Zinc LLC, Rostov-on-Don, Russia) and stearic acid (grade T-32, Nefis Cosmetics JSC, Kazan, Russia) were used as vulcanization activators. The rubber compound also included the antioxidant N-phenyl-N′-isopropyl-p-phenylenediamine (IPPD) (State Standard GOST 5234-78 [41], Neftekhim Innovations LLC, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia). Dibutyl phthalate (DBP) (State Standard GOST 8728-88 [42], purity 99.5%, EcoTEK LLC, Moscow, Russia), a petroleum resin (Technical Conditions TU 2451-01-51513617-2007, Sibplast grade, EcoTEK LLC, Moscow, Russia), and petroleum bitumen (State Standard GOST 6617-2021 [43], BN 90/10 grade, LUKOIL-Volgogradneftepererabotka LLC, Volgograd, Russia) were used as softeners (plasticizers). The filler was carbon black of grades P 803 (Technical Conditions TU 20.13.21-001-04639704-2017, ash content not more than 2%, specific surface area 14–18 m2/g, EcoPolza PCF LLC, Astrakhan, Russia) and P 514 (Technical Conditions TU 20.13.21-001-04639704-2017, external specific surface area 42 ± 15 m2/g, EcoPolza PCF LLC, Astrakhan, Russia).
In the rubber compound, 5–15 phr of carbon black grade P 803 was partially replaced with a shungite filler derived from waste dumps of rare-metal mining (the Bakyrchik deposit, Kazakhstan), with its carbon-enriched concentrate obtained by flotation, and with an acid-activated shungite concentrate.

2.2. Preparation of Shungite Fillers

Preliminary preparation of the shungite ore (ShO) was carried out by crushing it in a grinding unit to obtain particles with sizes of 1–20 μm. Carbon enrichment of the shungite ore was performed by flotation according to the procedure described in [24,30], using a laboratory flotation machine FML-3 (Research and Engineering Corporation “Mekhanobr-Tekhnika”, St. Petersburg, Russia) with a cell volume of 3.0 L, under the selected reagent regime at a pulp temperature of 15 ± 1 °C. During flotation enrichment of ShO, pine oil Flotol 5219 (frother, 1260 g/t) and kerosene TS-1 (collector, 1134 g/t) were used; these reagents interact selectively with the minerals constituting the shungite ore. The flotation time was 10 min. After completion of the process, the suspension was filtered, and the shungite concentrate (ShC) was dried in a drying oven at 105 ± 5 °C to constant mass.
Acid activation of the shungite concentrate was carried out in a glass reactor using a 10% aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid according to the procedure described in [44,45]. The process was conducted at 50 °C under stirring for 6 h using a magnetic stirrer (300 rpm). Upon completion of the activation, the suspension was filtered. The precipitate on the filter was washed with demineralized water to a neutral pH value. After neutralization, the precipitate of the acid-activated shungite concentrate (ShC(a)) was dried in a drying oven at 105 ± 5 °C to constant mass. The particle size after modification remained in the range of 1–20 µm.

2.3. Preparation of Rubber Compounds and Vulcanizates

The rubber compounds were prepared in a closed laboratory internal mixer, a Brabender Plasti-Corder® Lab-Station W50 E (Brabender, Duisburg, Germany), for 9 min at a temperature of 60 ± 3 °C and a rotor speed of 60 rpm. The mixing chamber volume was 50 cm3, with a fill volume of 85%. An industrially recommended formulation for pressure hoses (Sample C, Table 1) was used as the base recipe. In the experimental samples, part of carbon black (CB) grade P 803 was replaced with a filler based on shungite ore. CB P 803 was partially substituted with the shungite filler in the amount of 5–15 phr, in steps of 5 phr. The loading levels of shungite filler were selected based on an analysis of the literature data [17,24]. The vulcanizing agent (sulfur) was introduced during mixing in the internal mixer at the final stage, 1.0 min before the end of the mixing process.
Vulcanization of the rubber compounds was carried out in a laboratory vulcanization press with induction-heated plates, model 100-400-2E (Krasin Plant JSC, Kirov, Russia), at 160 °C in accordance with State Standard GOST 269-66. The thickness of the test sheets was 2.0 ± 0.2 mm.

2.4. Methods for the Characterization of Shungite Fillers, Rubber Compounds, and Vulcanizates

The microstructure and energy-dispersive analysis of the samples were carried out using a SEM3200 scanning electron microscope (CIQTEK Co., Ltd., Anhui, Hefei, China) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) system with a tungsten cathode (XFlash Detector 730M-300, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA), which enabled additional determination of the chemical composition of the examined regions. The investigations were performed at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV in low-vacuum mode. Backscattered electron (BSE) detectors were used to obtain the micrographs.
The elemental composition of the shungite fillers was examined using a 1430 VP scanning electron microscope (LEO Electron Microscopy Ltd., Oberkochen, Germany) coupled with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer Quantax 200 (Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany).
The specific surface area of the shungite fillers was determined by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method using thermodesorption of an adsorbed gas on a “Sorbtometr” analyzer (Katakon JSC, Cheboksary, Russia) with liquid nitrogen as the coolant.
The thermal stability of the shungite fillers was evaluated in dynamic mode in the temperature range of 25–800 °C, and the influence of the shungite fillers on the thermal stability of the vulcanizates was assessed in the range of 25–600 °C in a nitrogen atmosphere using a STA 6000 thermal analyzer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) at a heating rate of 5 °C/min.
Dynamic mechanical parameters (tan δ) of the vulcanizates were studied using a DMA 242 C dynamic mechanical analyzer (NETZSCH Group, Selb, Germany) in the temperature range from −65 to +65 °C at a heating rate of 5 °C/min and a frequency of 1 Hz, in penetration mode.
Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the shungite fillers were recorded using a Nicolet iS10 FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The measurements were carried out in the range 600–4000 cm−1 with a spectral resolution of 2 cm−1 in ATR mode.
The rheometric characteristics of the rubber compounds were determined using an MDR GT-3000-A moving-die rheometer (GOTECH, Taichung City, Taiwan) at 160 °C for 30 min in accordance with State Standard GOST 34751-2021 [46] (ASTM D5289 [47]).
Mooney viscosity of the rubber compounds was determined using a Mooney viscometer UGT 7080S2 (GOTECH, Taichung City, Taiwan) in accordance with ASTM D1646 [48]. The measurements were carried out at 100 °C, with a 1 min preheating period followed by a 4 min test (ML (1 + 4) 100 °C).
The physical-mechanical properties of the rubber samples were evaluated according to State Standard GOST 270-75 [49] by tensile strength, elongation at break which were determined on the universal electromechanical testing machine TRM-P 50 C1 Tochline (NPO Tochpribor LLC, Rostov-on-Don, Russia). Shore A hardness of the samples was measured on a portable hardness tester TH-200 (Time Group, Beijing, China) according to State Standard GOST 263-75 [50]. Rebound resilience was determined on a Shoba type rebound resilience tester UMR-1 (Polymermash Group LLC, St. Petersburg, Russia) according to State Standard GOST 27110-86 [51].
Stability of the rubber properties to thermal aging in air was evaluated from the changes in the physicomechanical characteristics (tensile strength, elongation at break, rebound resilience and Shore A hardness) after conditioning at 100 ± 2 °C for 72 h. The tests were carried out in accordance with State Standard GOST 9.024-74 [52].
The resistance of the elastomeric compositions to the action of hydrocarbons was assessed from the change in tensile strength after exposure in oil for 3 days at 23 ± 2 °C. These tests were also performed in accordance with State Standard GOST 9.024-74. The composition of the oil is given in Table 2.

3. Results and Discussion

Shungite from the Bakyrchik deposit is classified as anthraxolite (a solid bitumen system) and is characterized by turbostratic (disordered) stacking of layers and a high content of mineral impurities [36,53,54]. In this study, the shungite ore was subjected to preliminary preparation aimed at carbon enrichment. Beneficiation of the pre-ground shungite ore was carried out by flotation, followed by acid activation of the resulting shungite concentrate.
Figure 1 shows mapping images of the shungite fillers obtained by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The samples represent solid dispersed systems with different microphase contents. The elemental composition and its quantitative distribution in the samples were determined by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy.
The morphology and chemical composition of the shungite fillers differ markedly. The SEM images (Figure 1) indicate that the particles of shungite ore (ShO), concentrate (ShC), and acid-activated concentrate (ShC(a)) have an anisotropic shape and a broad size distribution, typical of coarsely ground powders.
The elemental composition (Table 3) indicates a significant carbon enrichment of the concentrate and acid-activated concentrate. The carbon content in the initial shungite ore (ShO) is 11%, whereas in the shungite concentrate (ShC) it reaches 39%, and in the acid-activated concentrate (ShC(a)) 55%. At the same time, beneficiation markedly reduces the mineral fraction. For example, the SiO2 content decreases from 49% in ShO, to 13% in ShC, and to 9% in ShC(a) (Table 3). Acid activation of ShC leads to partial dissolution of the silicate phase, which is accompanied by an increase in the specific surface area of the filler from 9 m2/g (ShO) to 17 m2/g (ShC) and 23 m2/g (ShC(a)) (Table 3). The increase in specific surface area can be attributed both to the removal of mineral components and to the disaggregation of filler particles, which enhances the reinforcing effect through physical factors. At the same time, acid treatment enriches the filler surface with the carbonaceous phase and increases the proportion of oxygen-containing functional groups, thereby altering the chemical nature of the filler surface. The combination of these factors—an increased geometric contact area and modification of surface chemistry—creates favorable conditions for enhanced physicochemical interactions between the shungite filler and the rubber matrix and explains the observed increase in the reinforcing effect in compositions containing ShC(a).
Figure 2 presents the IR spectra of the initial shungite ore, the shungite concentrate, and the acid-activated shungite concentrate. In the spectrum of the initial material, an intense band with a maximum at 3626 cm−1 is observed, corresponding to the stretching vibrations of OH groups of silicate minerals, along with a broad absorption region in the range of 1427–900 cm−1 associated with Si–O and Al–O bond vibrations.
Transition to the shungite concentrate is accompanied by a shift in the OH stretching band to 3617 cm−1 and the appearance of bands at 1859 and 1521 cm−1, indicating an increased contribution of the carbonaceous phase and oxygen-containing functional groups. After acid treatment, the intensity of bands characteristic of the silicate component (1650–900 cm−1) decreases markedly, while the band near 1883 cm−1, attributed to carbonyl (C=O) groups, becomes more pronounced.
The obtained IR spectral data indicate a reduction in the mineral phase content and the development of a functionalized carbonaceous surface of the filler as a result of acid activation. These changes may promote enhanced physicochemical interactions between the filler and the rubber matrix as well as components of the vulcanization system; however, they do not constitute direct evidence of interfacial interactions.
The effect of flotation enrichment and acid activation on the thermal stability of the shungite fillers was evaluated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) (Figure 3). It was shown that ShO loses no more than 3 wt% up to 600 °C, which is most likely associated with the loss of adsorbed and bound water. ShC and ShC(a) lose up to 3 wt% up to 100 °C. Up to 800 °C, ShC and ShC(a) lose an additional 5 wt% of the sample mass. This behavior presumably arises from the formation of hydroxides during flotation and activation, which decompose upon heating to form the corresponding oxides and water.
An important characteristic that affects the uniform distribution of ingredients in the rubber compound and, consequently, the physicomechanical properties of the rubbers is their viscosity. According to the Mooney viscosity data, the viscosity of the rubber compounds is influenced by both the type and the amount of shungite filler. In particular, partial replacement of CB P 803 with ShO or ShC in the rubber formulations leads to a gradual decrease in Mooney viscosity with increasing shungite filler content (Figure 4).
Conversely, when more than 5 phr of the acid-activated concentrate ShC(a) is introduced, the Mooney viscosity begins to increase (Figure 4). Such behavior can be attributed to the high carbon content, the developed surface area (Table 3), and the large number of oxygen-containing groups on the surface of ShC(a), which enhance rubber–filler interactions and promote structuring, leading to reduced macromolecular mobility and, consequently, an increase in the structural viscosity of the compound [56,57].
Analysis of the rheometric vulcanization curves of the rubber compounds at 160 °C showed that the use of the shungite fillers (Figure 5, Table 4) increases both the scorch time (ts) and the time to reach the optimum curing time (t90).
This behavior is presumably related to the fact that, upon the introduction of the shungite fillers, components of the vulcanization system are adsorbed on their surface and the metal oxides (Ca+2, K+) present in shungite compete with zinc oxide in the salt-forming reaction with stearic acid. As a result, the effective concentration of the active sulfur–accelerator complexes decrease, which slows down the formation of the three-dimensional crosslinked network [33,55].
The changes in the minimum torque (ML) values for the samples containing shungite fillers correlate with the Mooney viscosity values obtained for the rubber compounds under study. The decrease in the maximum torque upon the introduction of the initial shungite filler is associated with its low dispersity and weak reinforcing effect, together with the competition of the mineral phase with the sulfur–zinc curing system, which leads to a reduction in vulcanizate stiffness. In contrast, ShC(a) enriched in the carbonaceous phase and characterized by an increased specific surface area, enhances physicochemical interactions with the rubbers and promotes the formation of bound rubber, which is accompanied by an increase in vulcanizate stiffness and a rise in the maximum torque. The obtained result is consistent with a number of previous studies [58,59,60,61]. The vulcanization of the rubber compounds was carried out taking into account the rheometric data obtained.
The key requirements for oil- and fuel-resistant rubbers, which are widely used under exposure to aggressive media (petroleum products, oils, and solvents), are the retention of their physicomechanical properties and high thermal stability [62].
First, the properties of the rubbers were determined under normal conditions. It was shown that replacing CB P 803 with ShO leads to a decrease in the tensile strength of the rubbers (Table 5). Moreover, the greater the amount of CB replaced with ShO, the lower the tensile strength of the samples. This may be attributed to its low dispersity and the predominantly mineral, weakly organophilic nature of ShO. Replacement of CB with the carbon-enriched ShC, which contains a smaller fraction of the mineral phase and has a higher specific surface area, makes it possible to maintain the tensile strength at the level of the control sample. A similar effect is observed when CB is replaced with the acid-treated ShC(a); at the same loading, the tensile strength in this case further increases by 7–9% compared with the control sample.
It should be noted that the elongation at break increased compared with the control for all samples containing ShO and its derivatives ShC and ShC(a). Presumably, the introduction of the shungite fillers leads to a decrease in the crosslink density and stiffness of the vulcanizates due to their weak reinforcing effect and the partial retardation of the sulfur–zinc curing system. These findings are consistent with our previously conducted studies [33,55].
The largest changes in properties after thermo-oxidative aging for 72 h at 100 °C, relative to the initial values, are observed for the samples containing ShO. In the compositions with ShC, the magnitude of these changes is comparable to that of the control, whereas for the samples with ShC(a) the changes are smaller or at the level of the control (Table 5). This behavior is presumably related to the composition of the shungite fillers. ShO is characterized by a low carbon content (11 wt%) and a high fraction of the mineral phase, including metal oxides (SiO2, CaO, MnO, etc.) capable of catalyzing radical oxidative processes. In ShC, the carbon content increases to 39 wt% and the fraction of SiO2 and several metal oxides decreases, resulting in changes in properties after aging that are reduced to the level of the control rubber. In ShC(a), the carbon content is even higher (55 wt%) and several oxides (CaO, MnO, etc.) are practically removed, which further suppresses the catalytic decomposition of hydroperoxides and enhances the barrier role of the carbon phase, thereby ensuring minimal changes in the performance characteristics of the vulcanizates under thermo-oxidative aging (Table 5). Thus, ShC(a) provides the best stability of properties under elevated-temperature service conditions, whereas the use of ShO may lead to pronounced changes in these properties.
Analysis of the thermogravimetric curves of the vulcanizates (Figure 6) shows that the onset decomposition temperature is the same for all samples (200 °C), i.e., the introduction of the shungite fillers does not affect the formation of volatile products.
Thermogravimetric analysis showed that the incorporation of the shungite fillers affects the mass-loss rate of the rubber composites at elevated temperatures only to a minor extent. The main mass-loss region (200–450 °C) is associated with the degradation of processing additives and copolymer components of the rubber matrix, whereas the rapid mass-loss stage at higher temperatures is predominantly related to thermal decomposition of the main polymer backbone.
The presence of solid mineral shungite particles does not result in a significant additional release of volatile products or the appearance of new degradation pathways in this temperature range; therefore, their influence on the mass-loss rate during the stages of thermal degradation remains relatively weak. This behavior is consistent with the general characteristics of TGA of polymer composites, in which the matrix polymer dominates the main decomposition stages, while the effect of inert fillers on sample mass loss is typically limited.
The effect of the shungite fillers on the thermal stability of the rubbers in the initial mass-loss region is presented in Table 6, based on the temperatures corresponding to 5, 10, and 15% mass loss.
Figure 7 presents the results of dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) for the control compound and compositions containing various shungite fillers. The control compound without shungite fillers exhibits a maximum of the mechanical loss tangent (Tg) at −23.5 °C. With the addition of shungite ore (ShO10), a pronounced decrease in Tg to −49.8 °C is observed. In contrast, for samples containing shungite concentrate and acid-activated shungite concentrate, the shift in tan δ is less pronounced, occurring at −27.2 °C and −31.5 °C, respectively.
The reduction in the glass transition temperature can be attributed to the combined effect of the filler on the segmental dynamics of the rubber matrix. According to the literature, a significant decrease in Tg in polymer composites is often associated with a plasticization effect caused by the migration of low-molecular-weight organic components from the filler into the matrix, which increases polymer chain mobility and lowers Tg [63]. At the same time, the possible contribution of microstructural factors and specific interfacial interactions cannot be excluded, as they may also affect the temperature transitions in filled systems. Thus, the observed expansion of the low-temperature service range of the composites should be considered in light of these features.
An important performance characteristic of rubbers used for the manufacture of oil- and fuel-resistant pressure hoses is the stability of their properties in hydrocarbon media. Therefore, the changes in the strength properties of the rubbers after exposure in oil for 72 h were determined. The experiments showed that the introduction of ShO and its derivatives does not impair the oil resistance of the rubber. The change in tensile strength of the samples after exposure was small (Table 7) and did not exceed 2.7%. This indicates that partial replacement of CB with ShO and its enriched derivatives does not deteriorate the stability of the rubber properties in petroleum products for the formulations considered.
In evaluating the resistance of the rubbers to aggressive media, it was found that after exposure of samples containing various amounts of ShO, ShC and ShC(a) in oil for 72 h at 23 ± 1 °C, the mass change did not exceed +0.16%. On this basis, it can be concluded that ShO, ShC and ShC(a) do not impair the resistance of the rubbers to standard liquid for rubber SJR-1 (standard hydrocarbon medium for evaluating the properties of rubbers and rubber technical products).

4. Conclusions

In this work, shungite ore was modified by flotation followed by acid activation, and the effect of shungite ore and its carbon-enriched concentrates on the properties of oil- and fuel-resistant rubbers based on a blend of nitrile butadiene rubber and butadiene–α-methylstyrene rubber was investigated. Based on the experiments carried out, the following conclusions can be drawn. Flotation enrichment of shungite ore followed by acid activation of the concentrate increases the carbon content from 11% to 39% and 55%, and decreases the SiO2 content from 49% to 13% and 9%, respectively. At the same time, the specific surface area of the carbon-enriched filler increases by a factor of 2–2.5. Partial replacement of carbon black in the rubber formulations with shungite ore or flotation-enriched shungite concentrate leads to a gradual decrease in Mooney viscosity compared with the sample without shungite fillers. In contrast, the acid-activated shungite concentrate, at loadings above 5 phr, increases the viscosity of the rubber compound. This effect is attributed to the large number of oxygen-containing groups on its surface, which form additional interactions within the “rubber–filler” system. All shungite fillers increase both the scorch time and the optimum cure time, which is attributed to the presence of oxide impurities that compete in the vulcanization activation reactions. The acid-activated shungite concentrate provides high tensile strength and good thermo-oxidative stability of the rubbers, whereas the use of shungite ore at loadings above 5 phr reduces the tensile strength and may lead to a pronounced change in this parameter upon thermo-oxidative aging. It has been shown that the shungite fillers lower the glass transition temperature of the rubbers, thereby extending the low-temperature service range of the products. Upon immersion in oil, rubbers containing shungite ore and its carbon-enriched concentrates retain their mechanical properties; the best resistance in hydrocarbon media is exhibited by the rubber filled with the acid-activated shungite concentrate.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.N., Y.K. and K.B.; methodology, A.N., Y.K., K.B. and S.V.; software, A.N.; validation, K.B., A.N. and R.T.; formal analysis, A.N., Y.K., K.B. and S.V.; investigation, A.N.; resources, K.B.; data curation, A.N. and E.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.N., E.C. and Y.K.; writing—review and editing, A.N., E.C. and Y.K.; visualization, A.N.; supervision, E.C., R.T. and M.N.; project administration, E.C. and M.N.; funding acquisition, M.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. AP23490999).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

The author expresses gratitude to the Ministry of Culture and Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan (grant “Tauelsizdik urpaktary” 2024). The particle distribution analysis was conducted within the framework of the project “Advanced Engineering School “PromKhimTech” based on the Polyolefin Laboratory.”

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

ShOShungite ore
ShCShungite concentrate
ShC(a)Shungite concentrate acid-activated
TGAThermogravimetric Analysis
DMADynamic Mechanical Analysis

References

  1. Olewnik-Kruszkowska, E.; Adamczyk, A.; Gierszewska, M.; Grabska-Zielińska, S. Comparison of How Graphite and Shungite Affect Thermal, Mechanical, and Dielectric Properties of Dielectric Elastomer-Based Composites. Energies 2021, 15, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Egorov, E.; Turmanov, R.; Zhapparbergenov, R.; Oryngaliyev, A.; Akylbekov, N.; Appazov, N.; Loshachenko, A.; Glukhoedov, N.; Nakyp, A.; Semenova, N. Dynamic Mechanical Analysis, Morphology, Physico-Mechanical, and Performance Properties of EPDM/NBR Rubber Blends Containing Chlorosulfonated Polyethylene as a Compatibilizer. Polymers 2025, 18, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  3. Fan, Y.; Fowler, G.D.; Zhao, M. The Past, Present and Future of Carbon Black as a Rubber Reinforcing Filler—A Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 247, 119115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Bokobza, L.; Bruneel, J.-L.; Couzi, M. Raman Spectroscopy as a Tool for the Analysis of Carbon-Based Materials (Highly Oriented Pyrolitic Graphite, Multilayer Graphene and Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes) and of Some of Their Elastomeric Composites. Vib. Spectrosc. 2014, 74, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Peterson, S.C. Carbon Black Replacement in Natural Rubber Composites Using Dry-Milled Calcium Carbonate, Soy Protein, and Biochar. Processes 2022, 10, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Karunanayake, L.; Etampawala, T.; de Silva, D.J.; Bandara, J.; Rajapaksha, A.U.; Vithanage, M. Role and Potential of Biochar as a Sustainable Alternative Reinforcing Filler to Carbon Black in Rubber Composites. Biochar 2025, 7, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Peterson, S.C. Coppiced Biochars as Partial Replacement of Carbon Black Filler in Polybutadiene/Natural Rubber Composites. J. Compos. Sci. 2020, 4, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Koriem, A.A.; Abd El-Aziz, M.E.; Salem, S.R.; Hussain, A.I.; Turky, G. Management of Agricultural Waste to Manufacture Biochar: An Alternative Reinforcing Filler for Carbon Black in Nitrile Butadiene Rubber Composites. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 428, 139360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Egorov, E.N.; Sandalov, S.I.; Kol’tsov, N.I. Influence of basalt fibres on the physical-mechanical, performance and dynamic properties of rubber for rail pads. Chem. Sustain. Dev. 2023, 31, 362–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Egorov, E.N.; Ushmarin, N.F.; Sandalov, S.I.; Kol’tsov, N.I. Studying the Effect of Trans-Polynorbornene on the Properties of a Rubber Mixture for Rail Fastener Pads. Inorg. Mater. Appl. Res. 2022, 13, 1019–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Ushmarin, N.F.; Krasnova, E.V.; Egorov, E.N.; Kol’tsov, N.I.; Stroganov, I.V.; Khairullin, R.Z. The Effect of Hollow Corundum Microspheres on the Properties of Materials Based on Carbon-Chain Rubbers. Polym. Sci. Ser. D 2018, 11, 320–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Cherezova, E.N.; Karaseva, Y.S.; Nakyp, A.M. Evaluation of the Durability of Limited Swelling Rubber Filled with Modified Powdered Cellulose from Cotton Waste. Polym. Sci. Ser. D 2023, 16, 681–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Garishin, O.K.; Shadrin, V.V.; Belyaev, A.Y.; Kornev Yu, V. Kornev Micro and Nanoshungites—Perspective Mineral Fillers for Rubber Composites Used in the Tires. Mater. Phys. Mech. 2018, 40, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yadykina, V.V.; Vyrodova, K.S.; Potapov, E.E. Study of the Impact of the Composite “Rubber:Shungite” on the Properties of Bituminous Rubber Binder. In Innovations and Technologies in Construction; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 302–308. [Google Scholar]
  15. Yadykina, V.V.; Vyrodova, K.S.; Potapov, E.E. Efficiency of Using Shungite Filler for Modifying Organic Binder. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 945, 012025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Kumar, V.; Alam, M.N. Advances in Functional Rubber and Elastomer Composites II. Polymers 2025, 17, 2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Bobrova, V.V.; Nechipurenko, S.V.; Kasperovich, A.V.; Kaiaidarova, A.K. Application of Carbon-Mineral Filler Based on Coal Shale Mining by-Products in Elastomeric Compositions. Bull. L.N. Gumilyov ENU. Chem. Geogr. Ecol. Ser. 2025, 152, 57–73. Available online: https://bulchmed.enu.kz/index.php/bulchmed/article/view/603 (accessed on 22 January 2026).
  18. Egorov, E.N.; Salomatina, E.V.; Vassilyev, V.R.; Bannov, A.G.; Sandalov, S.I. Effect of Polynorbornene on Physico-Mechanical, Dynamic, and Dielectric Properties of Vulcanizates Based on Isoprene, α-Methylstyrene-Butadiene, and Nitrile-Butadiene Rubbers for Rail Fasteners Pads. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Cherezova, E.N.; Galikhanov, M.F.; Karaseva, Y.S.; Nakyp, A.M. Impact of the Composition of Rubbers Filled with Carboxymethyl Cellulose on Their Properties. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2023, 96, 462–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Petrova, N.N.; Portnyagina, V.V.; Mukhin, V.V.; Timofeeva, E.N.; Matveeva, N.V.; Ivanova, S.F. Frost-Resistant Elastomeric Nanocomposites for Operation in the Far North Conditions. Mater. Sci. Forum 2019, 945, 412–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Mosin, O.; Ignatov, I. Mineral Shungite. Structure and Properties. Nanoindustry 2013, 3, 32–39. Available online: https://www.nanoindustry.su/journal/article/3681 (accessed on 22 January 2026).
  22. Tokpayev, R.R.; Atchabarova, A.A.; Abdullayeva, S.A.; Nechipurenko, S.V.; Yefremov, S.A.; Nauryzbayev, M.K. New Supports for Carbon-Metal Catalytic Systems Based on Shungite and Carbonizates of Plant Raw Materials. Eurasian Chem. J. 2015, 17, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Ignatov, I.; Mosin, O. Composition and Structural Properties of Fullerene Analogous Mineral Shungite. Mathematical Model of Interaction of Shungite with Water Molecules. Available online: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sostav-i-strukturnye-svoystva-prirodnogo-fullerensoderzhaschego-minerala-shungita-matematicheskaya-model-vzaimodeystviya-shungita-s (accessed on 1 May 2014).
  24. Yushkin, N.P. Globular Supramolecular Structure of Shungite: Data from Scanning Tunneling Microscopy. Rep. USSR Acad. Sci. 1994, 337, 800–803. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kishibayev, K.K.; Serafin, J.; Tokpayev, R.R.; Khavaza, T.N.; Atchabarova, A.A.; Abduakhytova, D.A.; Ibraimov, Z.T.; Sreńscek-Nazzal, J. Physical and Chemical Properties of Activated Carbon Synthesized from Plant Wastes and Shungite for CO2 Capture. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Ushmarin, N.F.; Efimovskii, E.G.; Petrova, N.N.; Sandalov, S.I.; Kol’tsov, N.I. The influence of powder shungytes on properties of oil-and benzo resistant rubbers. Izv. Vyss. Uchebnykh Zaved. Khimiya Khimicheskaya Tekhnol. 2018, 62, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Nurmukhametova, A.N.; Zenitova, L.A. Influence of Shungite on the Properties of Rubber Mixtures Based on EPDM. Kauchuk Rezina 2010, 1, 25–27. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nurmukhametova, A.N.; Zenitova, L.A.; Kiprova, A.V.; Nizamiyev, I.R. Application of Shungite in the Production of Non-Molded Rubber Products. Vestn. Kazan. Tekhnol. Un-ta 2010, 6, 236–241. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  29. Klyuchnikova, N.; Piskareva, A.; Urvanov, K.; Gordeev, S.; Genov, I. Influence of shungite on performance properties of polymeric composite material. Bull. Belgorod State Technol. Univ. Named After. V. G. Shukhov 2020, 5, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Aleksandrova, T.; Afanasova, A.; Nikolaeva, N.; Romashev, A.; Aburova, V.; Prokhorova, E. Investigation of the Possibility of Obtaining High-Purity Carbon Materials and Recovering Valuable Metals from Shungite Rocks. Minerals 2025, 15, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Yefimchyk, K.V.; Kudina, E.F. The influence of shungite on the hardness of a composite material based on high-pressure polyethylene. Bull. Sukhoi State Tech. Univ. Gomel 2024, 3, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Kablov, V.F.; Novopoltseva, O.M.; Kryukova, D.A.; Molchansky, N.S. Influence of the fractional composition of shungite and its combination with mineral microfibers on the properties of rubbers. Izv. Volgogr. STATE Tech. Univ. 2021, 5, 52–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Beknazarov, K.; Tokpayev, R.; Nakyp, A.; Karaseva, Y.; Cherezova, E.; El Fray, M.; Volfson, S.; Nauryzbayev, M. Influence of Kazakhstan’s Shungites on the Physical–Mechanical Properties of Nitrile Butadiene Rubber Composites. Polymers 2024, 16, 3370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  34. Ignatyev, S.D.; Statnik, E.S.; Ozherelkov, D.Y.; Zherebtsov, D.D.; Salimon, A.I.; Chukov, D.I.; Tcherdyntsev, V.V.; Stepashkin, A.A.; Korsunsky, A.M. Fracture Toughness of Moldable Low-Temperature Carbonized Elastomer-Based Composites Filled with Shungite and Short Carbon Fibers. Polymers 2022, 14, 1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  35. Polunina, I.A.; Buryak, A.K.; Goncharova, I.S.; Visotzkii, V.V.; Petukhova, G.A.; Polunin, K.E.; Ulyanov, A.V. Modification of a Shungite Material for the Application in Sorption and Membrane Technologies. Sorbtsionnye Khromatogr. Protsessy 2019, 16, 234–240. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kazankapova, M.; Yefremov, S.; Nechipurenko, S.; Nauryzbayev, M. Study of Physical Chemical Characteristics of Shungite Rocks from Kazakhstan and Russia Using High-Resolution Physical Chemical Methods. Chem. Bull. Kazakh Natl. Univ. 2013, 72, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Kazankapova, M.; Bekzhanova, A.; Efremov, S.; Nauryzbayev, M. Study of Physical Chemical Characteristics of a Shungite. Chem. Bull. Kazakh Natl. Univ. 2012, 66, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Teimouri, S.; Potgieter, J.H.; van Dyk, L.; Billing, C. The Kinetics of Pyrite Dissolution in Nitric Acid Solution. Materials 2022, 15, 4181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. GOST 11138-2019; Butadienemethylstyrene Synthetic Rubber SRMS-30ARKM-15 and Butadiene-Styrene Rubber SRS-30ARKM-15. Specifications: Moscow, Russia, 2019.
  40. GOST 7087-75; 2,2′-Dibenzothiazole Disulfide. Specifications: Moscow, USSR, 1975.
  41. CAS 101-72-4; N-Isopropyl-N’-phenyl-P-phenylenediamine (IPPD). Sigma-Aldrich: Saint Louis, MO, USA.
  42. GOST 8728-88; Dibutyl Phthalate (DBP). Specifications: Moscow, USSR, 1988.
  43. GOST 6617-2021; Petroleum Construction Bitumens. Specifications: Moscow, Russia, 2021.
  44. Gao, Y.; Zhang, G.; Wang, M.; Liu, D. The Critical Role of Pulp Density on Flotation Separation of Nickel-Copper Sulfide from Fine Serpentine. Minerals 2018, 8, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Fujita, T.; Aoki, T.; Ponou, J.; Dodbiba, G.; He, C.; Wang, K.; Ning, S.; Chen, H.; Wei, Y. Removal of Impurities from Shungite via a Combination of Physical and Chemical Treatments. Minerals 2021, 11, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. GOST 34751-2021; Rubber Compounds. Determination of Vulcanization Characteristics Using Rotorless Cure Meters. Specifications: Moscow, Russia, 2021.
  47. ASTM D5289-19a; Standard Test Method for Rubber Property—Vulcanization Using Rotorless Cure Meters. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2019.
  48. ASTM D1646-19a; Standard Test Methods for Rubber—Viscosity, Stress Relaxation, and Pre-Vulcanization Character-Istics (Mooney Viscometer). ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2019.
  49. GOST 270-75; Rubber. Method of the Determination Elastic and Tensile Stress-Strain Properties. Specifications: Moscow, USSR, 1975.
  50. GOST 263-75; Rubber. Method for Determination of Shore A Hardness. Specifications: Moscow, USSR, 1975.
  51. GOST 27110-86; Method of Determination Rebound Elasticity on a Machine of the Shob Type. Specifications: Moscow, USSR, 1986.
  52. GOST 9.024-74; Unified System of Corrosion and Ageing Protection. Rubbers. Methods of Heat Ageing Stability De-Termination. Specifications: Moscow, USSR, 1974.
  53. Efremov, S.A.; Nechipurenko, S.V.; Kazankapova, M.K.; Washington, B.; Tassibekov, K.S.; Nauryzbaev, M.K. Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Shungite Rock of Kazakhstan. Eurasian Chem. J. 2013, 15, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  54. Glebashev, S.G.; Ignatiev, S.V.; Kovyazin, S.V. Formation and Placement of Shungite Rocks of the Kyzylov Zone (Eastern Kazakhstan). Sov. Geol. Soviet Geol. 1989, 1, 33–42. [Google Scholar]
  55. Beknazarov, K.; Nakyp, A.; Cherezova, E.; Karaseva, Y.; Khasanov, A.; Ignaczak, W.; Tokpayev, R.; Nauryzbayev, M. Influence of Shungite from the Bakyrchik Deposit on the Properties of Rubber Composites Based on a Blend of Non-Polar Diene Rubbers. J. Compos. Sci. 2025, 9, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Robertson, C.G.; Hardman, N.J. Nature of Carbon Black Reinforcement of Rubber: Perspective on the Original Polymer Nanocomposite. Polymers 2021, 13, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  57. Greenough, S.; Dumont, M.-J.; Prasher, S. The Physicochemical Properties of Biochar and Its Applicability as a Filler in Rubber Composites: A Review. Mater. Today Commun. 2021, 29, 102912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  58. Kabulov, A.T.; Beknazarov, K.I.; Tokpayev, R.R.; Atchabarova, A.A.; Bulybaev, M.E.; Khassanov, D.A.; Kubasheva, D.B.; Slyambayeva, A.K.; Kishibayev, K.K.; Nauryzbayev, M.K. Production of Dry Building Mixes Using Waste of the Mining and Metallurgical Complex of Kazakhstan. Int. J. Biol. Chem. 2022, 15, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Sombatsompop, N.; Thongsang, S.; Markpin, T.; Wimolmala, E. Fly Ash Particles and Precipitated Silica as Fillers in Rubbers. I. Untreated Fillers in Natural Rubber and Styrene–Butadiene Rubber Compounds. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 93, 2119–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Sombatsompop, N.; Wimolmala, E.; Markpin, T. Fly-ash Particles and Precipitated Silica as Fillers in Rubbers. II. Effects of Silica Content and Si69-treatment in Natural Rubber/Styrene–Butadiene Rubber Vulcanizates. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 104, 3396–3405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Sombatsompop, N.; Wimolmala, E.; Sirisinha, C. Fly Ash Particles and Precipitated Silica as Fillers in Rubbers. III. Cure Characteristics and Mechanical and Oil-resistance Properties of Acrylonitrile-butadiene Rubber. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 110, 2877–2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Post, W.; Kuijpers, L.J.; Zijlstra, M.; van der Zee, M.; Molenveld, K. Effect of Mineral Fillers on the Mechanical Properties of Commercially Available Biodegradable Polymers. Polymers 2021, 13, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Ahn, G.C.; Jang, S.S.; Kwak, H.J.; Lee, S.R.; Oh, Y.K.; Park, K.K. Characteristics of Rice Hulls, Sawdust, Wood Shavings and Mixture of Sawdust and Wood Shavings, and Their Usefulness According to the Pen Location for Hanwoo Cattle. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 29, 599–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Figure 1. SEM images of the shungite fillers. (a) ShO [55]; (b) ShC; (c) ShC(a).
Figure 1. SEM images of the shungite fillers. (a) ShO [55]; (b) ShC; (c) ShC(a).
Polymers 18 00330 g001
Figure 2. IR spectra of the shungite fillers: 1—ShO, 2—ShC, 3—ShC(a).
Figure 2. IR spectra of the shungite fillers: 1—ShO, 2—ShC, 3—ShC(a).
Polymers 18 00330 g002
Figure 3. TG curves of the shungite fillers.
Figure 3. TG curves of the shungite fillers.
Polymers 18 00330 g003
Figure 4. Effect of the shungite fillers on the Mooney viscosity (ML (1 + 4) 100 °C) of the rubber compounds.
Figure 4. Effect of the shungite fillers on the Mooney viscosity (ML (1 + 4) 100 °C) of the rubber compounds.
Polymers 18 00330 g004
Figure 5. Rheometric vulcanization curves of the rubber compounds 160 °C, 30 min).
Figure 5. Rheometric vulcanization curves of the rubber compounds 160 °C, 30 min).
Polymers 18 00330 g005
Figure 6. TG curves of the vulcanizates filled with the shungite fillers.
Figure 6. TG curves of the vulcanizates filled with the shungite fillers.
Polymers 18 00330 g006
Figure 7. DMA curves of the vulcanizates filled with the shungite fillers.
Figure 7. DMA curves of the vulcanizates filled with the shungite fillers.
Polymers 18 00330 g007
Table 1. Rubber compound formulations with the shungite fillers.
Table 1. Rubber compound formulations with the shungite fillers.
IngredientsRubber Compound Designation
C *ShO5ShO10ShO15ShC5ShC10ShC15ShC(a)5ShC(a)10ShC(a)15
Content, phr (Parts per Hundred Rubber)
1BNKS-18 AMN40404040404040404040
2BNKS-28 AMN50505050505050505050
3SBR-1705 HI-AR10101010101010101010
4Technical sulfur2222222222
5MBTS1.51.51.51.51.51.51.51.51.51.5
6ZnO3333333333
7Stearic acid1111111111
8IPPD2222222222
9DBP25252525252525252525
10Petroleum resin7777777777
11Petroleum bitumen8888888888
12CB P 51420202020202020202020
13CB P 803100959085959085959085
14ShO051015000000
15ShC000051015000
16ShC(a)000000051015
* Control sample.
Table 2. Composition of oil from the Romashkinskoye oilfield.
Table 2. Composition of oil from the Romashkinskoye oilfield.
Sulfur,
%
Mechanical Impurities, %Resin Content, %Asphaltenes,
%
Paraffin, %Iron Sulfide, mg/LChloride Salts
mg/L%
3.620.312.656.332.0617.716023.350.66
Table 3. Characteristics of the shungite fillers.
Table 3. Characteristics of the shungite fillers.
ComponentContent, wt%
ShOShCShC(a)
C11.0 ± 0.539.0 ± 0.555 ± 0.5
Na2O1.77 ± 0.11.39 ± 0.11.43 ± 0.1
MgO1.31 ± 0.11.57 ± 0.10.81 ± 0.1
Al2O321.13 ± 0.120.26 ± 0.120.30 ± 0.1
SiO249.44 ± 0.113.64 ± 0.19.26 ± 0.1
P2O50.22 ± 0.01<0.10 ± 0.01<0.10 ± 0.01
K2O3.42 ± 0.13.50 ± 0.14.73 ± 0.1
CaO2.47 ± 0.11.16 ± 0.1<0.10 ± 0.01
TiO23.06 ± 0.12.17 ± 0.12.36 ± 0.1
MnO0.20 ± 0.01<0.10 ± 0.01<0.10 ± 0.01
Fe2O36.75 ± 0.19.37 ± 0.16.05 ± 0.1
Specific surface area, m2/g91723
Table 4. Parameters of the rheometric vulcanization curves of the rubber compounds (160 °C, 30 min).
Table 4. Parameters of the rheometric vulcanization curves of the rubber compounds (160 °C, 30 min).
ParameterRubber Compound Designation
CShO5ShO10ShO15ShC5ShC10ShC15ShC(a)5ShC(a)10ShC(a)15
ML, dN‧m4.042.662.582.492.612.863.003.523.313.24
MH, dN‧m15.6112.2811.4810.8314.1813.9313.6917.5218.3519.93
∆M, dN‧m11.579.628.808.3411.5710.7010.6914.0015.0416.69
t10, min1.301.611.501.781.281.261.211.791.991.95
t90, min6.868.168.349.788.979.738.708.058.938.88
Rv = 100/(t90 − t10)17.9815.2614.6212.5013.0011.0813.3515.9714.4014.43
Table 5. Physicomechanical properties of the rubbers.
Table 5. Physicomechanical properties of the rubbers.
Parameter *Sample Designation
CShO5ShO10ShO15ShC5ShC10ShC15ShC(a)5ShC(a)10ShC(a)15
Initial physicomechanical properties of the rubbers
TS, MPa9.78.57.47.18.910.19.49.810.010.1
ε, %293306327327363360363303306333
εres, %4.012.09.39.38.08.06.71.32.72.7
R, %28323233282828282828
HSA65676362666766686868
Physicomechanical properties of the rubbers after thermal aging (72 h at 100 °C)
TS, MPa11.110.49.910.110.110.710.310.210.310.0
ε, %210236250274253233240210203220
R, %18212120202020191819
HSA71747171737573767575
** Relative change in the physicomechanical properties of the rubbers after thermal aging (72 h at 100 °C)
∆ fp, %+14.43+22.35+33.78+42.25+13.48+5.94+9.57+4.08+3.0−1.0
∆ ε, %−28.33−22.88−23.55−16.21−30.30−35.28−33.88−30.69−33.66−33.93
∆ R, %−34.70−34.27−34.75−38.18−28.98−28.62−28.21−33.99−34.06−30.80
∆ HSA, %+11.52+10.55+12.64+14.05+10.98+10.70+10.82+11.32+9.66+9.52
* TS—tensile strength; ε—elongation at break; εres—residual elongation, R—rebound resilience; HSA—Shore A hardness. ** The relative change in the parameter was calculated using the following equation: Δx = ( x x 0 ) x 0 × 100 ,   %   , where x0 is the initial value and x is the current value after thermal aging.
Table 6. Mass loss of the vulcanizates in thermogravimetric analysis.
Table 6. Mass loss of the vulcanizates in thermogravimetric analysis.
SampleMass Loss, %
5101520
Temperature (°C) at Mass Loss
Rubber without shungite (C)270360470494
ShO10250325445485
ShC10262350445480
ShC(a)10270360450480
Table 7. Physicomechanical properties of the rubbers after exposure in oil for 72 h.
Table 7. Physicomechanical properties of the rubbers after exposure in oil for 72 h.
Parameter *Samples
CShO5ShO10ShO15ShC5ShC10ShC15ShC(a)5ShC(a)10ShC(a)15
TS, MPa10.28.57.67.29.010.49.59.810.210.2
∆ TS, %+5.20.0+2.7+1.4+1.10.0+1.00.0+2.0+1.0
∆m, %+0.14+0.11+0.13+0.15+0.12+0.14+0.16+0.13+0.14+0.15
* TS—tensile strength.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nakyp, A.; Cherezova, E.; Karaseva, Y.; Beknazarov, K.; Tokpayev, R.; Volfson, S.; Nauryzbayev, M. Oil- and Fuel-Resistant Rubber for Pressure Hoses Containing Carbon-Based Technological Waste as a Filler. Polymers 2026, 18, 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18030330

AMA Style

Nakyp A, Cherezova E, Karaseva Y, Beknazarov K, Tokpayev R, Volfson S, Nauryzbayev M. Oil- and Fuel-Resistant Rubber for Pressure Hoses Containing Carbon-Based Technological Waste as a Filler. Polymers. 2026; 18(3):330. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18030330

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nakyp, Abdirakym, Elena Cherezova, Yulia Karaseva, Kanat Beknazarov, Rustam Tokpayev, Svetoslav Volfson, and Mikhail Nauryzbayev. 2026. "Oil- and Fuel-Resistant Rubber for Pressure Hoses Containing Carbon-Based Technological Waste as a Filler" Polymers 18, no. 3: 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18030330

APA Style

Nakyp, A., Cherezova, E., Karaseva, Y., Beknazarov, K., Tokpayev, R., Volfson, S., & Nauryzbayev, M. (2026). Oil- and Fuel-Resistant Rubber for Pressure Hoses Containing Carbon-Based Technological Waste as a Filler. Polymers, 18(3), 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18030330

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop