Mechanical Enhancement and Fracture Mechanisms of SLA Photopolymer Composites Reinforced with Fish Bone Ash
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Preparation of Salmon Bone Ash
2.2. Preparation of Photopolymer/Bone Ash Composite Resins
2.3. SLA Printing Parameters and Specimen Fabrication
2.4. Tensile Test Procedure
2.5. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
2.6. Fracture Surface Analysis of SLA-Printed Photopolymer Composite Parts
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Processing Optimization of SLA-Printed Photopolymer/Bone Ash Composites
3.2. Tensile Properties of SLA-Printed Photopolymer Composites
3.3. FTIR Analysis of Photopolymer/Bone Ash Composites
3.4. Fracture Surface Morphology
3.5. Correlation Between Mechanical Performance and Structural Features
3.6. Statistical Analysis of Tensile Strength
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Gao, S.; Sun, Y.; Xi, L.; Zhao, T.; Huang, Y.; He, R.; Li, Y. Recent advances in machine learning-assisted design of additive manufacturing metastructures: A review. Compos. Struct. 2025, 372, 119525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suresh, S.; Natarajan, E.; Sudhagar, S.; Boopathi, S.; Elayaraja, R. Additive Manufacturing for a Sustainable Production: Materials, Processes, and Impact. In Futuristic Technology for Sustainable Manufacturing; IGI Global Scientific Publishing: Hershey, PA, USA, 2024; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Alparslan, C.; Bayraktar, Ş.; Gupta, K. A comparative study on mechanical performance of PLA, ABS, and CF materials fabricated by fused deposition modeling. Facta Univ. Ser. Mech. Eng. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lakkala, P.; Munnangi, S.R.; Bandari, S.; Repka, M. Additive manufacturing technologies with emphasis on stereolithography 3D printing in pharmaceutical and medical applications: A review. Int. J. Pharm. X 2023, 5, 100159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mhmood, T.R.; Al-Karkhi, N.K. A review of the stereolithography 3D printing process and the effect of parameters on quality. Al-Khwarizmi Eng. J. 2023, 19, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amini, R.; Guijt, R.M.; Themelis, T.; De Vos, J.; Eeltink, S. Recent developments in digital light processing 3D-printing techniques for microfluidic analytical devices. J. Chromatogr. A 2023, 1692, 463842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alparslan, C.; Bayraktar, Ş. Advances in digital light processing (DLP) bioprinting: A review of biomaterials and its applications, innovations, challenges, and future perspectives. Polymers 2025, 17, 1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deshmane, S.; Kendre, P.; Mahajan, H.; Jain, S. Stereolithography 3D printing technology in pharmaceuticals: A review. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2021, 47, 1362–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Qin, Q.; Wang, J. A review of stereolithography: Processes and systems. Processes 2020, 8, 1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, S.Y.; Park, M.S.; Lee, J.W.; Yun, J.S. A study on the rheological and mechanical properties of photo-curable ceramic/polymer composites with different silane coupling agents for SLA 3D printing technology. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tilendo, A.C.; Pajarito, B.B. Reinforcement of stereolithography resin with silica-based fillers. Mater. Sci. Forum 2017, 890, 74–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerdroodbar, A.E.; Alihemmati, H.; Zeighami, M.; Bodaghi, M.; Kouzani, A.Z.; Pourabbas, B.; Zolfagharian, A. Vat polymerization 3D printing of composite acrylate photopolymer-based coated glass beads. Mater. Res. Express 2023, 10, 085306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saha, R.K.; Rahman, M.M.; Islam, M.T.; Mumin, M.M.; Ray, N.C. Investigating the impact of layer thickness and print orientation on strength and structural integrity of SLA 3D printed composites. Int. J. Lightweight Mater. Manuf. 2025, 9, 165–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Li, M.; Hao, N.; Ragauskas, A.J. Stereolithography 3D printing of lignin-reinforced composites with enhanced mechanical properties. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 20197–20204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garcia, G.E.S.; de Sousa Junior, R.R.; Gouveia, J.R.; Dos Santos, D.J. Graphene oxide-based nanocomposites for stereolithography (SLA) 3D printing: Comprehensive mechanical characterization under combined loading modes. Polymers 2024, 16, 1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ameta, K.L.; Solanki, V.S.; Singh, V.; Devi, A.P.; Chundawat, R.S.; Haque, S. Critical appraisal and systematic review of 3D & 4D printing in sustainable and environment-friendly smart manufacturing technologies. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2022, 34, e00481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, G.K.; Pandey, D.; Liu, H.; Kango, N.; Shukla, P. Sustainable technologies for bio-waste utilization and valorization: Perspectives and challenges. Biomass Bioenergy 2025, 199, 107941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joseph Chandran, A.; Sanjay, M.R.; Siengchin, S. Sustainable hybrid PLA based composites with animal waste fillers for lightweight applications. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2026, 39, 1136–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manickaraj, K.; Thirumalaisamy, R.; Palanisamy, S.; Ayrilmis, N.; Massoud, E.E.S.; Palaniappan, M.; Sankar, S.L. Value-added utilization of agricultural wastes in biocomposite production: Characteristics and applications. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2025, 1549, 72–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kandpal, B.C.; Johri, N.; Kumar, N.; Srivastava, A. Effect of industrial/agricultural waste materials as reinforcement on properties of metal matrix composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 46, 10736–10740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radhakrishnan, S.; Khan, A.; Dwivedi, S.P.; Sharma, B.; Gupta, S.; Gupta, P.; Chaudhary, V. Studies on mechanical, thermal, and water immersion of plant and animal wastage nanofiller-based bio-fiber-reinforced composites. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2024, 14, 29591–29612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganesh, B.N.; Rekha, B. A comparative study on tensile behaviour of plant and animal fiber reinforced composites. Int. J. Innov. Appl. Stud. 2013, 2, 645–648. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, H.; Misra, J.P.; Singh, I. Friction and wear behaviour of epoxy composites reinforced with food waste fillers. Compos. Commun. 2020, 22, 100436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bashir, A.S.; Manusamy, Y. Recent developments in biocomposites reinforced with natural biofillers from food waste. Polym. -Plast. Technol. Eng. 2015, 54, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bas, M.; Daglilar, S.; Kuskonmaz, N.; Kalkandelen, C.; Erdemir, G.; Kuruca, S.E.; Ficai, A. Mechanical and biocompatibility properties of calcium phosphate bioceramics derived from salmon fish bone wastes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hani, F.; Firouzi, A.; Islam, M.R.; Sumdani, M.G. Mechanical and thermal properties of fishbone-based epoxy composites: The effects of thermal treatment. Polym. Compos. 2021, 42, 1224–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hammood, A.S.; Hassan, S.S.; Alkhafagy, M.T.; Jaber, H.L. Effect of calcination temperature on characterization of natural hydroxyapatite prepared from carp fish bones. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corrêa, T.H.A.; Holanda, J.N.F. Fish bone as a source of raw material for synthesis of calcium phosphate. Mater. Res. 2019, 22, e20190486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anycubic Resin 1 kg SLA. Available online: https://filetto3d.com/anycubici-recine-1-kg-sla (accessed on 20 March 2026).
- ASTM D638-22; Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2022.
- Laureto, J.J.; Pearce, J.M. Anisotropic mechanical property variance between ASTM D638-14 Type I and Type IV fused filament fabricated specimens. Polym. Test. 2018, 68, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anand Kumar, S.; Shivraj Narayan, Y. Tensile testing and evaluation of 3D-printed PLA specimens as per ASTM D638 Type IV standard. In Innovative Design, Analysis and Development Practices in Aerospace and Automotive Engineering; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 79–95. [Google Scholar]
- Fisher, R.A. Statistical Methods for Research Workers; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1970. [Google Scholar]
- Bewick, V.; Cheek, L.; Ball, J. Statistics review 9: One-way analysis of variance. Crit. Care 2004, 8, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alparslan, C.; Can, Y.T.; Dervişoğlu, U.; Altıntaş, A.; Bayraktar, Ş. Integrated microstructural, mechanical and machinability assessment of AlSi10Mg and AlSi10MgCu alloys: Experimental and RSM-based optimization approach. Silicon 2025, 18, 687–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Welch, B.L. On the comparison of several mean values: An alternative approach. Biometrika 1951, 38, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alparslan, C.; Yentimur, M.F.; Kütük-Sert, T.; Bayraktar, Ş. A review on additive manufactured engineering materials for enhanced road safety and transportation applications. Polymers 2025, 17, 877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ercan Oğuztürk, G.; Pulatkan, M.; Alparslan, C.; Oğuztürk, T.; Bayraktar, Ş. Comparative evaluation and optimization of auxin type and concentration on rooting efficiency of Photinia × fraseri Dress stem cuttings using response surface methodology. Plants 2025, 14, 2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Games, P.A.; Howell, J.F. Pairwise multiple comparison procedures with unequal n’s and/or variances: A Monte Carlo study. J. Educ. Stat. 1976, 1, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Games, P.A.; Keselman, H.J.; Rogan, J.C. Simultaneous pairwise multiple comparison procedures for means when sample sizes are unequal. Psychol. Bull. 1981, 90, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaccard, J.; Becker, M.A.; Wood, G. Pairwise multiple comparison procedures: A review. Psychol. Bull. 1984, 96, 589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Minaz, M.; Félix, L.M.; Er, A.; Köse, Ö.; Ak, K.; Alparslan, C.; Hoseini, S.M. Evaluation of rainbow trout response to the optimal anesthetic concentration of citronella oil (Cymbopogon nardus) predicted by artificial neural network. Aquaculture 2025, 613, 743326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, K.H.; Mohamad, Z.; Khan, Z.I.; Habib, M. Tailoring UV penetration depth in photopolymer nanocomposites: Advancing SLA 3D printing performance with nanofillers. Polymers 2025, 17, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahouti, T.; Örnek, E.; Çevir, B.; Berber, H.; Belen, M.A.; Sadıkoğlu, H.; Yilmazer, H. SLA-printed BaTiO3-reinforced bio-nanocomposites: Influence of printing parameters on mechanical, dielectric, and thermal properties. ACS Omega 2025, 10, 53350–53363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taormina, G.; Sciancalepore, C.; Messori, M.; Bondioli, F. 3D printing processes for photocurable polymeric materials: Technologies, materials, and future trends. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 2018, 16, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alparslan, C.; Bayraktar, Ş. Additive manufacturing in biomaterials: A comprehensive and integrated review of innovations in tissue engineering, bioprinting, implant design, and regenerative medicine. Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop. 2026, 14, 013003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Decker, C.; Keller, L.; Zahouily, K.; Benfarhi, S. Synthesis of nanocomposite polymers by UV-radiation curing. Polymer 2005, 46, 6640–6648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pszczółkowski, B.; Zaborowska, M. Effect of layer exposure time in SLA-LCD printing on surface topography, hardness and chemical structure of UV-cured photopolymer. Lubricants 2025, 13, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gouda, K.; Bhowmik, S.; Das, B. A review on allotropes of carbon and natural filler-reinforced thermomechanical properties of upgraded epoxy hybrid composite. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2021, 60, 237–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rehman, I.; Bonfield, W.J.J. Characterization of hydroxyapatite and carbonated apatite by photo acoustic FTIR spectroscopy. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 1997, 8, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dorozhkin, S.V. Bioceramics of calcium orthophosphates. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 1465–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertoni, E.; Bigi, A.; Falini, G.; Panzavolta, S.; Roveri, N. Hydroxyapatite/polyacrylic acid nanocrystals. J. Mater. Chem. 1999, 9, 779–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szcześ, A.; Hołysz, L.; Chibowski, E. Synthesis of hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 249, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, L.; Wang, Y.; Lin, Z.; Luo, W.; Zhang, H.; Chen, G.; Dai, L. A simplified reinforcement and fracture mechanism analysis model of epoxy nanocomposites based on finite element simulation. Polymer 2022, 250, 124879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Białkowska, A.; Bakar, M.; Kucharczyk, W.; Zarzyka, I. Hybrid epoxy nanocomposites: Improvement in mechanical properties and toughening mechanisms—A review. Polymers 2023, 15, 1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, S.Y.; Feng, X.Q.; Lauke, B.; Mai, Y.W. Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2008, 39, 933–961. [Google Scholar]
- Mousavi, S.R.; Estaji, S.; Paydayesh, A.; Arjmand, M.; Jafari, S.H.; Nouranian, S.; Khonakdar, H.A. A review of recent progress in improving the fracture toughness of epoxy-based composites using carbonaceous nanofillers. Polym. Compos. 2022, 43, 1871–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, W.; Yoo, T.; Baek, K.; Cho, M.; Chung, H.; Shin, H.; Lee, Y.S. Strain rate effects on fracture toughness of polymer nanocomposites: A multiscale study. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2024, 298, 109924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friedrich, K.; Zhang, Z.; Schlarb, A.K. Effects of various fillers on the sliding wear of polymer composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 2329–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.S.; Arulmozhivarman, J.; Rajeshkumar, L.; Sanjay, M.R.; Siengchin, S.; Ramesh, M. Fatigue behavior of natural fiber-based epoxy composites. In Epoxy-Based Biocomposites; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023; pp. 229–266. [Google Scholar]
- Zare, Y. Study of nanoparticles aggregation/agglomeration in polymer particulate nanocomposites by mechanical properties. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 84, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, J.; Joshi, M.S.; Sun, C.T. Effect of inclusion size on mechanical properties of polymeric composites with micro and nano particles. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2006, 66, 1941–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jajam, K.C.; Tippur, H.V. Quasi-static and dynamic fracture behavior of particulate polymer composites: A study of nano- vs. micro-size filler and loading-rate effects. Compos. Part B Eng. 2012, 43, 3467–3481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, J.; Abeykoon, C.; Karim, N. Investigation into the effects of fillers in polymer processing. Int. J. Lightweight Mater. Manuf. 2021, 4, 370–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balguri, P.K.; Samuel, D.H.; Thumu, U. A review on mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 44, 346–355. [Google Scholar]
- Kuan, H.T.N.; Tan, M.Y.; Shen, Y.; Yahya, M.Y. Mechanical properties of particulate organic natural filler-reinforced polymer composite: A review. Compos. Adv. Mater. 2021, 30, 26349833211007502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eldressi, K.A.; Alojaly, H.M.; Salem, W.O.A.; Sanoussi, N.S. Review of recent developments in polymer matrix composites with particulate reinforcements. Ref. Modul. Mater. Sci. Mater. Eng. 2023, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, T.; Ali, M.; Riaz, Z.; Butt, H.; Al-Rub, R.K.A.; Dong, Y.; Umer, R. Recent developments in improving the fracture toughness of 3D-printed fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2024, 283, 111622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiran, M.D.; Govindaraju, H.K.; Yadhav, B.L.; Kumar, N. Effect of various parameters on fracture toughness of polymer composites: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, 92, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stern, T.; Marom, G. Fracture mechanisms and toughness in polymer nanocomposites: A brief review. J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boiko, Y.M.; Marikhin, V.A.; Myasnikova, L.P. Tensile strength statistics of high-performance mono- and multifilament polymeric materials: On the validity of normality. Polymers 2023, 15, 2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stawarczyk, B.; Özcan, M.; Trottmann, A.; Hämmerle, C.H.; Roos, M. Evaluation of flexural strength of hipped and presintered zirconia using different estimation methods of Weibull statistics. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2012, 10, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yurviany; Tamaza, D.; Widagdo, D.; Kusni, M.; Hadi, B.K. Statistical analysis of CFRP mechanical properties using B-basis based on Weibull and ANOVA distribution analysis. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 852, 012078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chuchulska, B.; Zlatev, S. Linear dimensional change and ultimate tensile strength of polyamide materials for denture bases. Polymers 2021, 13, 3446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Souza, L.V.S.; Pavanello, L.; Dal Picolo, M.Z.; Kury, M.; Matos, I.C.R.T.; Cogo-Müller, K.; Cavalli, V. Mechanical and antibacterial properties of an experimental flowable composite containing Nb2O5 and NF-TiO2 nanoparticles. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2023, 143, 105919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







| Material | Stress (MPa) | Strain (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Photopolymer | 24.8 ± 1.2 | 8.37 ± 0.4 |
| Photopolymer + 4 wt.% FB ash | 32.4 ± 1.6 | 4.02 ± 1.1 |
| Photopolymer + 8 wt.% FB ash | 35.7 ± 1.8 | 5.16 ± 0.3 |
| Photopolymer + 12 wt.% FB ash | 37.9 ± 1.9 | 4.21 ± 0.2 |
| Material | n | Mean (MPa) | SD | Shapiro–Wilk W | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% Photopolymer | 5 | 25.084 | 1.208 | 0.787 | 0.063 |
| 4% FB | 5 | 32.754 | 1.070 | 0.895 | 0.385 |
| 8% FB | 5 | 36.282 | 1.437 | 0.886 | 0.337 |
| 12% FB | 5 | 37.952 | 3.637 | 0.876 | 0.289 |
| Test | Statistic | df1 | df2 | p-Value | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levene’s test | 7.413 | 3 | 16 | 0.002 | Variances not homogeneous |
| One-way ANOVA | 43.579 | 3 | 16 | <0.001 | Significant group effect |
| Welch ANOVA | 65.843 | 3 | 8.591 | <0.001 | Significant group effect (robust) |
| Comparison | Mean Difference (MPa) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|
| 100% Photopolymer—4% FB | −7.670 | <0.001 |
| 100% Photopolymer—8% FB | −11.198 | <0.001 |
| 100% Photopolymer—12% FB | −14.568 | 0.002 |
| 4% FB—8% FB | −3.528 | 0.012 |
| 4% FB—12% FB | −6.898 | 0.039 |
| 8% FB—12% FB | −3.370 | 0.321 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Alparslan, C.; Minaz, M.; Baysal, E.; Yentimur, M.F.; Koçar, O.; Bayraktar, Ş. Mechanical Enhancement and Fracture Mechanisms of SLA Photopolymer Composites Reinforced with Fish Bone Ash. Polymers 2026, 18, 1348. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18111348
Alparslan C, Minaz M, Baysal E, Yentimur MF, Koçar O, Bayraktar Ş. Mechanical Enhancement and Fracture Mechanisms of SLA Photopolymer Composites Reinforced with Fish Bone Ash. Polymers. 2026; 18(11):1348. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18111348
Chicago/Turabian StyleAlparslan, Cem, Mert Minaz, Erhan Baysal, Muhammed Fatih Yentimur, Oğuz Koçar, and Şenol Bayraktar. 2026. "Mechanical Enhancement and Fracture Mechanisms of SLA Photopolymer Composites Reinforced with Fish Bone Ash" Polymers 18, no. 11: 1348. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18111348
APA StyleAlparslan, C., Minaz, M., Baysal, E., Yentimur, M. F., Koçar, O., & Bayraktar, Ş. (2026). Mechanical Enhancement and Fracture Mechanisms of SLA Photopolymer Composites Reinforced with Fish Bone Ash. Polymers, 18(11), 1348. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18111348

