Next Article in Journal
Mechanical and Thermal Behavior of Hemp-Reinforced Starch/Agar Biocomposites: Insights from Finite Element Simulation and Machine Learning Models
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of a Digital Image Processing- and Machine Learning-Based Approach to Predict the Morphology and Thermal Properties of Polyurethane Foams
Previous Article in Journal
Toward Sustainable Polyhydroxyalkanoates: A Next-Gen Biotechnology Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Size-Exclusion Chromatography of Macromolecules: A Brief Tutorial Overview on Fundamentals with Computational Tools for Data Analysis and Determination of Structural Information
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chain Size and Knots of Ring Polymers in All-Crossing and Intra-Crossing Melts

1
Shandong Key Laboratory of Biophysics, Institute of Biophysics, Dezhou University, Dezhou 253023, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Polymer Science and Technology, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, China
3
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China
4
Shandong Provincial Engineering Research Center of Novel Pharmaceutical Excipients and Controlled Release Preparations, College of Pharmacy, Dezhou University, Dezhou 253023, China
5
Qilu Synva Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Dezhou 253023, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2025, 17(7), 854; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17070854
Submission received: 28 February 2025 / Revised: 18 March 2025 / Accepted: 21 March 2025 / Published: 23 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computational Modeling and Simulations of Polymers)

Abstract

:
Using dynamic Monte Carlo simulations based on the bond-fluctuation model, we systematically investigated the size and knots of ring polymers in all-crossing systems and intra-crossing systems. Our results demonstrate that the interchain constraint can increase the knotting probability, but does not alter the scaling relationship between knotting probability and chain length for ring polymers in melts. Having established that, we derived the interchain constraint contribution to the free energy of ring polymers in intra-crossing systems based on the knotting probability and obtained the scaling relationship between the size R and chain length N, i.e., R~N1/6. And, by calculating the mean-squared radius of gyration of ring polymers in intra-crossing systems, we validated these scaling results. Finally, we analyze the size of knotted ring polymers with different types and compare corresponding scaling exponents for size versus chain lengths of ring polymers with different knotting complexities. These results provide fundamental insights into the static properties of ring polymers in melts.

1. Introduction

The topological constraints of ring polymers play a pivotal role in their static and dynamic properties, including conformation, diffusion, and rheology [1,2,3]. Since Jacob and Wollman [4] first proposed the existence of circular chromosomes, and Freifelder et al. [5] obtained the visual cyclic structure of viral DNA, many studies on ring polymers have been carried out based on experiments [6,7,8,9,10,11], theories [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19], and computer simulations [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. However, some open questions still remain regarding ring polymers in melts.
For example, different from linear polymers, both experiments [7,8,9,10,11] and simulations [1,15,19,20,21,22,23,24] found the scaling exponent ν of the radius of gyration Rg~Nν decreases from 1/2 to 1/3 with increasing chain length N for ring polymers in melts. Regarding the use of theories [11], the solution to the conformational problem for ring melts is hampered, because the Hamiltonian representation of the topological constraints has not been found. Two different approaches, geometry and free energy approaches, are used to assess the scaling relationship between Rg and N in ring melts. The first approach starts from the assumed geometric structures of ring polymers. The early lattice animal model with double folded loops [32] arrives at Rg~N1/4, but the crumpled globule proposed by Grosberg et al. [33,34] claims that ν = 1/3 for collapsed long chains, and the ideal lattice trees or animals model [32,35] describing a ring polymer in a gel predicted ν = 1/3. Furthermore, Obukhov et al. [16] put forward the decorated loop model and provided an analytic expression for Rg.
The second approach considers the heuristic expressions for the free energy in terms of the Flory-type and obtains the power law dependence of Rg from N by deriving and minimizing the free energy of ring polymers in melts. Cates and Deutsch [12] defined the free energy F of a ring polymer in melts as follows:
F ~ k B T R 3 N + k B T N R 2
where kB represents the Boltzmann constant, T is temperature, and R is the size of the polymer ring, respectively. The first term of Equation (1) denotes the interchain constraint contribution (Finter) resulting from the nonconcatenation constraint with its neighbors, and the second term is the intrachain constraint contribution (Fintra), representing the free energy required to force a Gaussian chain polymer into a region of size R. Upon the usual minimization of F, Cates and Deutsch obtained a scaling law R~Nν for ν = 2/5. Subsequently, Suzuki et al. [19] recalculated the interchain constraint contribution Finter and reached ν = 1/3 for long ring polymers in melts. Moreover, Sakaue [17,18] took into account many-body effects of topological origin in dense systems and obtained ν = 1/2 for short ring polymers and the broad crossover from 2/5 to 1/3 for relative long ring polymers. Furthermore, beginning with considering an isolated ring in a linear melt, Lang et al. [15,36] argued that the free energy of intrachain constraint contribution, Fintra, is composed by the entropy loss upon squeezing an ideal ring and topological nonconcatenation contribution. On the basis of above discussion, Lang et al. [15,36] predicted the scaling exponents as 2/5, 3/8, and 4/9 for ring polymers in melts with short lengths, intermediate lengths, and long lengths, respectively. The results of the above heuristic expressions and scaling exponents are summarized in Table 1. However, the Flory-type expressions for interchain constraint contributions and intrachain constraint contributions have not been confirmed by experiments or simulations.
Knotting is a common phenomenon that occurs in biological and chemical systems and plays a significant role in slowing down the relaxation of a compressed DNA [37], facilitating catalysis of proteins [38], jamming nanopore translocation [39], and reducing the mechanical strength of polymers [40]. It has been shown that the knotting probability P(N) of ideal and self-avoiding ring polymers approaches unity with an exponential form [41,42,43] as follows:
P ( N ) ~ 1 C exp ( N / N 0 )
where C is a constant, and N0 is the characteristic length of random knotting. In our previous study [31], we reported the size and dynamics of ring polymers under different topological constraints by tuning interchain and intrachain interactions independently, and introduced four ring polymer systems, i.e., non-crossing systems, all-crossing systems, inter-crossing systems, and intra-crossing system. The knotting probability of ring polymers in an intra-crossing system, where the chain uncrossability constraint is always applied for interchain movements, but is never applied for intrachain movements, has not been investigated.
In this work, following our previous work [31], we systematically investigate the knotting probability and their size of ring polymers in an all-crossing system and intra-crossing system and discuss the heuristic expressions for the free energy of ring polymers in melts using Shaffer’s dynamic Monte Carlo (MC) simulation [44,45] with the bond fluctuation model. In the following section, we present our simulation model and method. In the Results and Discussion, the simulation results are discussed based on three aspects, followed by the overall conclusions drawn from these results, which are presented in Section 4.

2. Simulation Method and Model

2.1. Simulation Method

Compared to Carmesin and Kremer’s original bond fluctuation model [46], Shaffer’s [44,45] is more convenient with regard to turning the topological interaction on and off by controlling bond crossing, and is faster in obtaining equilibrium configurations. The model has been extensively applied to polymer melts [19,21,29,47,48] and polymer blends [49,50,51,52,53] due to its computational efficiency. In this model, all polymers are placed on a 3D cubic lattice with a size L, and periodic boundary conditions are applied in all coordinate directions. To avoid the finite size effect, the length of the simulation box was set to L > 3Rg for the respective ring polymer chains. The occupancy of the lattice is fixed at 0.5, which has been shown to be sufficiently high to describe melt-like systems [54]. Using the same occupancy fraction, our previous work [31] also agrees with the results of the molecular dynamics simulation [1,2], such as the scaling exponent of N for R decreasing from 2/5 to 1/3 with increasing N, and the scaling relation being g3(t)~t0.75 for ring polymers in real systems, where g3(t) represents the mean-square displacement at time t.
The initial configurations of ring polymers are placed on the lattice by double folding and each ring is isolated from the others to avoid self-knots and concatenations. To equilibrate these highly ordered initial configurations, we run τeq Monte Carlo steps (MCSs), and then we run another τrun MCSs to collect and analyze data; all data reported are averages obtained over four independent simulations. The detailed simulation parameters are listed in Table S1 of the Supplementary Materials. Herein, a MCS is defined as a trial event for attempting to move every monomer to a randomly chosen nearest-neighbor site in the box once, and the displacement is accepted only if it satisfies the excluded volume constraint, chain connectivity constraint, and bond uncrossability constraint. The excluded volume constraint is implemented by allowing only a single monomer to occupy one lattice site simultaneously, and the chain connectivity constraint is enforced by restricting the length of the bond connecting two neighboring monomers to the set of values 1 ,   2 ,   3 in units of lattice spacing. The bond uncrossability constraint is switched off for ring polymers in all-crossing systems, while the uncrossability constraint is always applied for interchain movements, but is never applied for intrachain movements for ring polymers in intra-crossing systems. To ensure that the configurations of the ring are in equilibrium, the τeq and τrun of other simulation systems are 15 times larger than the relaxation time of the corresponding ring polymers.
The ring polymer size is characterized by the mean-square radius of gyration R g 2 , which is defined by
R g 2 = 1 N 2 i = 1 N j = i N R i R j 2
where Ri is the position of monomer i, and ⟨⋯⟩ indicates the ensemble average over all available conformations of ring polymers.

2.2. Identification of Knots

As shown in Figure 1, knots are usually categorized according to the minimum number of crossings in a projection onto a plane, and different knot types have different Alexander polynomials [55], except that occasionally multiple knot types share the same Alexander polynomial. Thus, we identify the knot types by the calculation of Alexander polynomials. We tabulate the Alexander polynomials for 250 knot types with 0 ≤ Ncross ≤ 10, where Ncross represents the minimal crossing number of the knot. Then, for a given ring polymer conformation, we project the conformation on a plane, calculate the Alexander polynomial, and obtain the knot type through the mapping between Alexander polynomials and knot types. It is worth noting that some knots share the same Alexander polynomial, such as composite knots 31#31 and 31#41, which share the same Alexander polynomials with 820 and 821 knots, respectively. [56] Because these overlapping Alexander polynomials usually correspond to the composite knots [57] and the probability of the overlapped Alexander polynomial between the 31#31 and 820 knots is close to the square of the probability of the 31 knot [58], it can be said that the overlapped Alexander polynomial comes from the 31#31 knot. We assign these overlapped Alexander polynomials to composite knots. For very complex knots with more than 10 crossings, it is impractical to determine the knot type using the Alexander polynomial, so we do not classify the knots with more than 10 crossings, and treat these knots as one category.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Knotting Probability of Ring Polymers

Knotting probability and properties of all-crossing ring polymers have been studied extensively in recent decades [41,42,43,59]. We compared the knotting probability of ring polymers in all-crossing systems and intra-crossing systems. As shown in Figure 2a, the knotting probability of a ring polymer in all-crossing systems follows Pk,a~1 − C0exp(N/C1), where C0 and C1 are constants and C0 = 1.1418, and C1 = −2217.58. The inset in Figure 2a illustrates the linear relationship between 1 − Pk,a and C0exp(N/C1) more clearly, and this result is consistent with Equation (2). However, as shown in Figure 2b, the knotting probability of ring polymers in intra-crossing systems is Pk,i~1 − C2exp(N/C3), where C2 and C3 are constants and C2 = 1.1168 and C3 = −597.74, which also corresponds to Equation (2). The inset of Figure 2b confirms the linear relationship between 1 − Pk,i and C2exp(N/C3). The result indicates that the interchain constraint has no influence on the scaling relationship between knotting probability and chain length of the ring polymers, but observably increases the knotting probability.

3.2. Interchain Constraint Contribution to the Free Energy

As shown in Table 1, based on different assumptions, many researchers have put forward their heuristic expressions for interchain constraint contribution (Finter) and intrachain constraint contribution (Fintra) of ring polymers in melts. Since there is no interchain or intrachain constraint in all-crossing systems, we focus on the intra-crossing systems to calculate the interchain constraint contribution which is required to squash a Gaussian chain of N steps into a region of linear size R [12]. Figure 3 gives the scaling relationship between knotting probability Pk,i and chain size R for ring polymers. The same results of all-crossing systems are given in Figure S1 of the Supplementary Materials. As shown in Figure 3, knotting probability Pk,i~R4 for ring polymers in intra-crossing systems, which indicates a scaling of interchain constraint free energy Finter~kBTR4. The intrachain constraint of a ring polymer mainly comes from its neighboring ring polymers; according to the theoretical result of Cates et al. [12] and Suzuki et al. [19], the intrachain constraint free energy can be represented by Fintra~kBTN/R2. Therefore, we obtained the free energy for ring polymers in intra-crossing systems as
F ~ k B T R 4 + k B T N R 2
which, following the usual minimization, yields
R ~ N 1 / 6
the scaling relation in Equation (5) has been verified by our previous study [31], which confirms our expression for the free energy of ring polymers in intra-crossing systems shown in Equation (4).
Moreover, we calculated the mean-square radius of gyration of knotting ring polymers and unknotting ring polymers in all-crossing systems and intra-crossing systems, respectively. As shown in Figure 4a, the power law relationship R 0 , a 2 ~ N 2 ν , for which the scaling exponent ν = 0.5 was established, is in accordance with ideal chains [31]. The value of R 0 , a 2 equals the mean-squared radius of the gyration of unknotting ring polymers R u , a 2 for short chain lengths. With an increase in chain length N, the value of R 0 , a 2 becomes closer and closer to that of the knotting ring polymers R k , a 2 . The reason is that the number of knotting rings increases with the increase in N, as shown in Figure 2a, which also results in the value of R 0 , a 2 being close to the value of R u , a 2 for short ring chains, and approximating to the value of R k , a 2 for long ring chains. Furthermore, the scaling exponent of R u , a 2 ~ N 2 ν increases with increasing N.
In contrast to all-crossing systems, the power law relationship between the mean-square radius of gyration and the chain length is smaller than 0.5 due to the interchain constraint. As shown in Figure 4b, the scaling exponent of N for R k , a 2 decreases from 0.48 to 0.167 with increases in N, which is consistent with our theoretical prediction in Equation (5). And, the value of R 0 , i 2 overlaps with the mean-squared radius of gyration of unknotting ring polymers R u , i 2 for short chain lengths, and approaches that of the knotting ring polymers R k , i 2 for large N values.

3.3. Probability and Sizes of Different Types of Knotting Rings

To identify the complexity of knotting ring polymers in melts, we calculated the knot type of ring polymers with different chain lengths and topological constraints. As shown in Figure 5, short ring polymers tend to form the knotting configuration with 3 crossings. And with increasing chain length, the probability of knots with less than 10 crossings first increases and then decreases in both all-crossing systems and intra-crossing systems, while the probability of knots with more than 10 crossings monotonically increases. These results demonstrate the rapid increase in complexity of knots with chain length in all-crossing systems and intra-crossing systems. Moreover, the peak of the knotting probability curve for ring polymers in all-crossing systems appears much later than those in intra-crossing systems, indicating the interchain topological constraints could increase the probability of knotting.
Figure 6 shows the scaling relationship between the mean-squared radius of gyration versus N for ring polymers with different complexities in all-crossing systems. Different from the scaling exponent, ν = 0.54 of N for the average size of all knotting ring polymers shown in Figure 4a; the scaling exponents for the mean-squared radius of gyration versus the chain length vary from 0.55 to 0.6 for ring polymers with different knotting complexities in all-crossing systems when the chain length is smaller than 1000. Based on these results, we can speculate that the scaling exponents for knotting types with 10 or more crossings are much smaller than 0.54. With further increases in chain length, the scaling exponents rapidly increase to 1.7 with different knotting complexities. Moreover, for a given chain length, the higher the number of crossings of the knotting polymers, the smaller the size of the polymers.
The scaling relationship between the mean-squared radius of gyration versus N for ring polymers with different complexities in intra-crossing systems is shown in Figure 7. The scaling exponents decrease from 0.55 to 0.3 with the increase in chain length for ring polymers with different knotting complexities in intra-crossing systems, with a similar trend in the average size of all knotting ring polymers, shown in Figure 4b. Quantitatively, the value of the scaling exponents for ring polymers with different knotting complexities is larger than that for the average size of all knotting ring polymers. Moreover, the higher the number of crossings in the knotting polymers, the smaller the size of the polymers with same chain length, which is in agreement with the results for ring polymers in all-crossing systems.
Finally, we calculated the knotting probability of ring polymers with different sizes. As shown in Figure 8, the knotting probability decreases with increases in size for ring polymers with same chain length, and the knotting probability of ring polymers in intra-crossing systems is significantly larger those in all-crossing systems, which agrees with the results shown in Figure 5. Furthermore, ring polymers, both in all-crossing systems and intra-crossing systems, present a good scaling relationship between knotting probability and the ratio of size for knotting rings to size for the average value of all ring polymers. For short ring polymers (N = 100), the scaling exponent is close to two, and the ring polymer is hardly knotted when its size is smaller than the average size of all ring polymers. For relatively long ring polymers (N = 500 and 1000), the scaling exponent decreases obviously and the knotting probability is nearly independent of the size for ring polymers with N = 1000 in intra-crossing systems, since almost all of the polymers are knotted.

4. Conclusions

By employing dynamic MC simulations of the bond-fluctuation model along with an analysis of knotting type, we systematically investigated the size and knots of ring polymers in all-crossing systems and intra-crossing systems.
First, we calculated the knotting probability of ring polymers and found that the interchain constraint can lead to higher knotting probability, but has no influence on the scaling relationship between knotting probability and the chain length of ring polymers. Then, we derived the interchain constraint contribution to the free energy of ring polymers in intra-crossing systems based on the knotting probability. According to the free energy, we obtained the scaling relationship between the size and chain length, i.e., R~N1/6, and we further verified this result by calculating the mean-squared radius of gyration of the ring polymers in intra-crossing systems. Finally, we analyzed the size of knotted ring polymers of different types, and found that the scaling exponents for size, versus the chain length of ring polymers with different knotting complexities, is larger than the scaling exponents of average knotting ring polymers in all-crossing systems, whereas the scaling exponents of ring polymers with different knotting complexities have similar trends with the average size of all knotting ring polymers.
The analyses presented in this work provide a better understanding of the static properties of ring polymers in melts, and the results contribute to calculations of the free energy of real ring polymer systems.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym17070854/s1, The detailed simulation parameters are listed in Table S1, and the scaling relation of knotting probability Pk,a with chain size R for ring polymers in all-crossing systems is shown in Figure S1 in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.M., J.G., and Y.R.; methodology, J.M.; resources, X.Y. and J.Y.; software, X.Y.; validation, J.Y., G.H., J.X., and M.Y.; formal analysis, J.M., G.H., M.Y., Y.W., and Y.M.; investigation, X.Y., J.Y., G.H., J.X., M.Y., Y.W. and Y.M.; data curation, J.M.; writing—original draft preparation, J.M. and J.G.; writing—review and editing, L.W. and Y.R.; visualization, J.M. and J.G.; supervision, Y.J., L.W., and Y.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant Nos. ZR2023QB232, ZR2023QF170, ZR2023QB125 and ZR2023QF174) and the Scientific Research Fund of Dezhou University (Grant Nos. 2022xjrc421 and 2022xjrc404).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable for studies not involving humans or animals.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Lianyong Wu was employed by the company Qilu Synva Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Halverson, J.D.; Lee, W.B.; Grest, G.S.; Grosberg, A.Y.; Kremer, K. Molecular dynamics simulation study of nonconcatenated ring polymers in a melt. I. Statics. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 204904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Halverson, J.D.; Lee, W.B.; Grest, G.S.; Grosberg, A.Y.; Kremer, K. Molecular dynamics simulation study of nonconcatenated ring polymers in a melt. II. Dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 204905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Parisi, D.; Costanzo, S.; Jeong, Y.; Ahn, J.; Chang, T.; Vlassopoulos, D.; Halverson, J.D.; Kremer, K.; Ge, T.; Rubinstein, M.; et al. Nonlinear shear rheology of entangled polymer rings. Macromolecules 2021, 54, 2811–2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jacob, F.; Wollman, E.L. Genetic and physical determinations of chromosomal segments in Escherichia coli. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 1958, 12, 75–92. [Google Scholar]
  5. Freifelder, D.; Kleinschmidt, A.K.; Sinsheimer, R.L. Electron Microscopy of Single-Stranded DNA: Circularity of DNA of Bacteriophage φX174. Science 1964, 146, 254–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Arrighi, V.; Gagliardi, S.; Dagger, A.C.; Semlyen, J.A.; Higgins, J.S.; Shenton, M.J. Conformation of cyclics and linear chain polymers in bulk by SANS. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 8057–8065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brás, A.R.; Gooßen, S.; Krutyeva, M.; Radulescu, A.; Farago, B.; Allgaier, J.; Pyckhout-Hintzen, W.; Wischnewski, A.; Richter, D. Compact structure and non-Gaussian dynamics of ring polymer melts. Soft Matter 2014, 10, 3649–3655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brás, A.R.; Pasquino, R.; Koukoulas, T.; Tsolou, G.; Holderer, O.; Radulescu, A.; Allgaier, J.; Mavrantzas, V.G.; Pyckhout-Hintzen, W.; Wischnewski, A.; et al. Structure and dynamics of polymer rings by neutron scattering: Breakdown of the Rouse model. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 11169–11176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gooßen, S.; Brás, A.R.; Krutyeva, M.; Sharp, M.; Falus, P.; Feoktystov, A.; Gasser, U.; Pyckhout-Hintzen, W.; Wischnewski, A.; Richter, D. Molecular scale dynamics of large ring polymers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 168302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Iwamoto, T.; Doi, Y.; Kinoshita, K.; Ohta, Y.; Takano, A.; Takahashi, Y.; Nagao, M.; Matsushita, Y. Conformations of ring polystyrenes in bulk studied by SANS. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 1539–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Richter, D.; Gooßen, S.; Wischnewski, A. Celebrating soft matter’s 10th anniversary: Topology matters: Structure and dynamics of ring polymers. Soft Matter 2015, 11, 8535–8549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cates, M.E.; Deutsch, J.M. Conjectures on the statistics of ring polymers. J. Phys. 1986, 47, 2121–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ge, T.; Panyukov, S.; Rubinstein, M. Self-similar conformations and dynamics in entangled melts and solutions of nonconcatenated ring polymers. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 708–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Grosberg, A.Y. Annealed lattice animal model and Flory theory for the melt of non-concatenated rings: Towards the physics of crumpling. Soft Matter 2014, 10, 560–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lang, M.; Fischer, J.; Sommer, J.-U. Effect of topology on the conformations of ring polymers. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 7642–7648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Obukhov, S.; Johner, A.; Baschnagel, J.; Meyer, H.; Wittmer, J.P. Melt of polymer rings: The decorated loop model. Europhys. Lett. 2014, 105, 48005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sakaue, T. Ring polymers in melts and solutions: Scaling and crossover. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 167802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sakaue, T. Statistics and geometrical picture of ring polymer melts and solutions. Phys. Rev. E 2012, 85, 021806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Suzuki, J.; Takano, A.; Deguchi, T.; Matsushita, Y. Dimension of ring polymers in bulk studied by Monte-Carlo simulation and self-consistent theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 144902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Müller, M.; Wittmer, J.P.; Cates, M.E. Topological effects in ring polymers: A computer simulation study. Phys. Rev. E 1996, 53, 5063–5074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Suzuki, J.; Takano, A.; Matsushita, Y. Topological effect in ring polymers investigated with Monte Carlo simulation. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129, 034903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tsolou, G.; Stratikis, N.; Baig, C.; Stephanou, P.S.; Mavrantzas, V.G. Melt structure and dynamics of unentangled polyethylene rings: Rouse theory, atomistic molecular dynamics simulation, and comparison with the linear analogues. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 10692–10713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vettorel, T.; Grosberg, A.Y.; Kremer, K. Statistics of polymer rings in the melt: A numerical simulation study. Phys. Biol. 2009, 6, 025013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vettorel, T.; Reigh, S.Y.; Yoon, D.Y.; Kremer, K. Monte-Carlo method for simulations of ring polymers in the melt. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2009, 30, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Parisi, D.; Ahn, J.; Chang, T.; Vlassopoulos, D.; Rubinstein, M. Stress relaxation in symmetric ring-linear polymer blends at low ring fractions. Macromolecules 2020, 53, 1685–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tsalikis, D.G.; Koukoulas, T.; Mavrantzas, V.G.; Pasquino, R.; Vlassopoulos, D.; Pyckhout-Hintzen, W.; Wischnewski, A.; Monkenbusch, M.; Richter, D. Microscopic structure, conformation, and dynamics of ring and linear poly(ethylene oxide) melts from detailed atomistic molecular dynamics simulations: Dependence on chain length and direct comparison with experimental data. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 2565–2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hur, K.; Winkler, R.G.; Yoon, D.Y. Comparison of ring and linear polyethylene from molecular dynamics simulations. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 3975–3977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pakula, T.; Geyler, S. Cooperative relaxations in condensed macromolecular systems. 3. Computer-simulated melts of cyclic polymers. Macromolecules 1988, 21, 1665–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Brown, S.; Szamel, G. Structure and dynamics of ring polymers. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 4705–4708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mo, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Lu, Y.; An, L. Size and dynamics of a tracer ring polymer embedded in a linear polymer chain melt matrix. Macromolecules 2022, 55, 1505–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mo, J.; Wang, Z.; Lu, Y.; An, L. Size and Dynamics of Ring Polymers under Different Topological Constraints. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2022, 41, 516–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Obukhov, S.P.; Rubinstein, M.; Duke, T. Dynamics of a ring polymer in a gel. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1994, 73, 1263–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Grosberg, A.; Rabin, Y.; Havlin, S.; Neer, A. Crumpled globule model of the three-dimensional structure of DNA. Europhys. Lett. 1993, 23, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Grosberg, A.Y.; Nechaev, S.K.; Shakhnovich, E.I. The role of topological constraints in the kinetics of collapse of macromolecules. J. Phys. Fr. 1988, 49, 2095–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Khokhlov, A.R.; Nechaev, S.K. Polymer chain in an array of obstacles. Phys. Lett. A 1985, 112, 156–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lang, M. Ring conformations in bidisperse blends of ring polymers. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 1158–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tang, J.; Du, N.; Doyle, P.S. Compression and self-entanglement of single DNA molecules under uniform electric field. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 16153–16158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Christian, T.; Sakaguchi, R.; Perlinska, A.P.; Lahoud, G.; Ito, T.; Taylor, E.A.; Yokoyama, S.; Sulkowska, J.I.; Hou, Y.-M. Methyl transfer by substrate signaling from a knotted protein fold. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2016, 23, 941–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rosa, A.; Di Ventra, M.; Micheletti, C. Topological Jamming of Spontaneously Knotted Polyelectrolyte Chains Driven Through a Nanopore. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 118301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Arai, Y.; Yasuda, R.; Akashi, K.-i.; Harada, Y.; Miyata, H.; Kinosita, K.; Itoh, H. Tying a molecular knot with optical tweezers. Nature 1999, 399, 446–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Deguchi, T.; Tsurusaki, K. A Statistical Study of Random Knotting Using the Vassiliev Invariants. J. Knot Theory Its Ramif. 1994, 3, 321–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Deguchi, T.; Tsurusaki, K. Universality of random knotting. Phys. Rev. E 1997, 55, 6245–6248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Moore, N.T.; Lua, R.C.; Grosberg, A.Y. Topologically driven swelling of a polymer loop. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 13431–13435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Shaffer, J.S. Effects of chain topology on polymer dynamics: Bulk melts. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101, 4205–4213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shaffer, J.S. Effects of chain topology on polymer dynamics: Configurational relaxation in polymer melts. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 761–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Carmesin, I.; Kremer, K. The bond fluctuation method: A new effective algorithm for the dynamics of polymers in all spatial dimensions. Macromolecules 1988, 21, 2819–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shaffer, J.S. Dynamics of confined polymer melts: Topology and entanglement. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 1010–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Brown, S.; Szamel, G. Computer simulation study of the structure and dynamics of ring polymers. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 6184–6192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yang, Y.; Sun, Z.; Fu, C.; An, L.; Wang, Z.-G. Monte Carlo simulation of a single ring among linear chains: Structural and dynamic heterogeneity. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 133, 064901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, J.; Song, J.; Lu, Y.; Ruan, Y.; An, L. Phase behavior and interfacial properties of diblock copolymer-homopolymer ternary mixtures: Influence of volume fraction of copolymers and interaction energy. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2017, 35, 874–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Subramanian, G.; Shanbhag, S. Self-diffusion in binary blends of cyclic and linear polymers. Macromolecules 2008, 41, 7239–7242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Subramanian, G.; Shanbhag, S. Conformational properties of blends of cyclic and linear polymer melts. Phys. Rev. E 2008, 77, 011801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shanbhag, S. Unusual dynamics of ring probes in linear matrices. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2017, 55, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Paul, W.; Binder, K.; Heermann, D.W.; Kremer, K. Dynamics of polymer solutions and melts. reptation predictions and scaling of relaxation times. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 95, 7726–7740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rolfsen, D. Knots and Links; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  56. Micheletti, C.; Marenduzzo, D.; Orlandini, E. Polymers with spatial or topological constraints: Theoretical and computational results. Phys. Rep. 2011, 504, 1–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Koniaris, K.; Muthukumar, M. Knottedness in ring polymers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991, 66, 2211–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dai, L.; Doyle, P.S. Universal Knot Spectra for Confined Polymers. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 6327–6333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mansfield, M.L.; Douglas, J.F. Properties of knotted ring polymers. I. Equilibrium dimensions. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 133, 044903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of unknot (the trivial knot, 01) and the prime knots with up to seven minimal crossings. In the notation, the first number indicates the minimal number of crossings a given knot can have in a standard projection and the second number indicates its tabular position among the knots with the same number of crossings in standard tables of knots [55].
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of unknot (the trivial knot, 01) and the prime knots with up to seven minimal crossings. In the notation, the first number indicates the minimal number of crossings a given knot can have in a standard projection and the second number indicates its tabular position among the knots with the same number of crossings in standard tables of knots [55].
Polymers 17 00854 g001
Figure 2. Knotting probability of ring polymers in (a) all-crossing systems, Pk,a, and (b) intra-crossing systems, with Pk,i versus chain length; the insets show the relationship between the unknotting probability and chain length. And, the schematics illustrate the model of ring polymers in (a) all-crossing systems and (b) intra-crossing systems.
Figure 2. Knotting probability of ring polymers in (a) all-crossing systems, Pk,a, and (b) intra-crossing systems, with Pk,i versus chain length; the insets show the relationship between the unknotting probability and chain length. And, the schematics illustrate the model of ring polymers in (a) all-crossing systems and (b) intra-crossing systems.
Polymers 17 00854 g002
Figure 3. Scaling relation of knotting probability Pk,i with chain size R for ring polymers in intra-crossing systems.
Figure 3. Scaling relation of knotting probability Pk,i with chain size R for ring polymers in intra-crossing systems.
Polymers 17 00854 g003
Figure 4. Normalized mean-squared radius of gyration versus chain length for knotting and unknotting ring polymers. R 0 , a 2 , R u , a 2 , and R k , a 2 represent the mean-squared radii of gyration for all rings, unknotting rings, and knotting rings in (a) all-crossing systems, respectively. R 0 , i 2 , R u , i 2 , and R k , i 2 represent rings in (b) intra-crossing systems. The error bars are smaller than the sizes of the symbols.
Figure 4. Normalized mean-squared radius of gyration versus chain length for knotting and unknotting ring polymers. R 0 , a 2 , R u , a 2 , and R k , a 2 represent the mean-squared radii of gyration for all rings, unknotting rings, and knotting rings in (a) all-crossing systems, respectively. R 0 , i 2 , R u , i 2 , and R k , i 2 represent rings in (b) intra-crossing systems. The error bars are smaller than the sizes of the symbols.
Polymers 17 00854 g004
Figure 5. Knotting probability versus chain length for ring polymers with different complexities in (a) all-crossing systems and (b) intra-crossing systems. Different symbols represent different crossing numbers of knotting types in ring polymers.
Figure 5. Knotting probability versus chain length for ring polymers with different complexities in (a) all-crossing systems and (b) intra-crossing systems. Different symbols represent different crossing numbers of knotting types in ring polymers.
Polymers 17 00854 g005
Figure 6. Normalized mean-squared radius of gyration R g 2 / N versus N, with different complexity in all-crossing systems. Different symbols represent different numbers of crossings in ring polymer knotting. The error bars are smaller than the sizes of the symbols.
Figure 6. Normalized mean-squared radius of gyration R g 2 / N versus N, with different complexity in all-crossing systems. Different symbols represent different numbers of crossings in ring polymer knotting. The error bars are smaller than the sizes of the symbols.
Polymers 17 00854 g006
Figure 7. Normalized mean-squared radius of gyration versus N for ring polymers with different complexities in intra-crossing systems. Different symbols represent different numbers of crossings in knotting ring polymers. The error bars are smaller than the sizes of the symbols.
Figure 7. Normalized mean-squared radius of gyration versus N for ring polymers with different complexities in intra-crossing systems. Different symbols represent different numbers of crossings in knotting ring polymers. The error bars are smaller than the sizes of the symbols.
Polymers 17 00854 g007
Figure 8. Knotting probability Pk versus the ratio of the mean-squared radius of gyration for knotting rings to those of the average value for all ring polymers.
Figure 8. Knotting probability Pk versus the ratio of the mean-squared radius of gyration for knotting rings to those of the average value for all ring polymers.
Polymers 17 00854 g008
Table 1. Heuristic expressions for the free energy of ring polymers in melts and the scaling exponents between the chain size R and chain length N.
Table 1. Heuristic expressions for the free energy of ring polymers in melts and the scaling exponents between the chain size R and chain length N.
Interchain Constraint Contribution
Finter
Intrachain Constraint Contribution
Fintra
Scaling Exponents
ν
Cates and Deutsch [12] k B T R 3 N k B T N R 2 2/5
Suzuki et al. [19] k B T N R 2 ( 4 π 3 R 3 N ) 2 k B T N R 2 1/3
Sakaue [17,18] k B T l n ( 1 R 3 N ) k B T N 3 R 6 1/2
2/5~1/3
Lang et al. [15,36] k B T R 2 k B T N R 2 + k B T N 2 R 3 2/5
k B T R 2 k B T N R 2 + k B T N 3 R 6 3/8
k B T R 3 N k B T N R 2 + k B T N 3 R 6 4/9
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mo, J.; Guo, J.; Yu, X.; Yang, J.; Hu, G.; Xin, J.; Yan, M.; Wang, Y.; Mo, Y.; Jia, Y.; et al. Chain Size and Knots of Ring Polymers in All-Crossing and Intra-Crossing Melts. Polymers 2025, 17, 854. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17070854

AMA Style

Mo J, Guo J, Yu X, Yang J, Hu G, Xin J, Yan M, Wang Y, Mo Y, Jia Y, et al. Chain Size and Knots of Ring Polymers in All-Crossing and Intra-Crossing Melts. Polymers. 2025; 17(7):854. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17070854

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mo, Jiangyang, Jingqiao Guo, Xue Yu, Jianlei Yang, Guodong Hu, Jianhui Xin, Mengxia Yan, Yuan Wang, Yongjie Mo, Yuxi Jia, and et al. 2025. "Chain Size and Knots of Ring Polymers in All-Crossing and Intra-Crossing Melts" Polymers 17, no. 7: 854. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17070854

APA Style

Mo, J., Guo, J., Yu, X., Yang, J., Hu, G., Xin, J., Yan, M., Wang, Y., Mo, Y., Jia, Y., Wu, L., & Ruan, Y. (2025). Chain Size and Knots of Ring Polymers in All-Crossing and Intra-Crossing Melts. Polymers, 17(7), 854. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17070854

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop