Next Article in Journal
Non-Isocyanate Synthesis of Aliphatic Polyurethane by BiCl3-Catalyzed Transurethanization Polycondensation
Previous Article in Journal
Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis and Empirical Evaluation of Carboxymethylcellulose/Alginate 3D Bioprinting Inks for Screw-Based Microextrusion
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation and Characterization of PHBV/PCL-Diol Blend Films
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High Energy Density in All-Organic Polyimide-Based Composite Film by Doping of Polyvinylidene Fluoride-Based Relaxor Ferroelectrics

1
Beijing Institute of Nanoenergy and Nanosystems, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, China
2
Center on Nano Energy Research, School of Physical Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
3
School of Nanoscience and Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2024, 16(8), 1138; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16081138
Submission received: 2 March 2024 / Revised: 8 April 2024 / Accepted: 10 April 2024 / Published: 18 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Functional Polymer Films)

Abstract

:
Recently, due to the advantages of superior compatibility, fewer interface defects, and a high electric breakdown field, all-organic dielectric composites have attracted significant research interest. In this investigation, we produced all-organic P(VDF-TrFE-CFE) terpolymer/PI (terp/PI) composite films by incorporating a small amount of terpolymer into PI substrates for high energy density capacitor applications. The resulting terp/PI-5 (5% terpolymer) composite films exhibit a permittivity of 3.81 at 1 kHz, which is 18.7% greater than that of pristine PI (3.21). Furthermore, the terp/PI-5 film exhibited the highest energy density (9.67 J/cm3) and a relatively high charge–discharge efficiency (84.7%) among the terp/PI composite films. The energy density of the terp/PI-5 film was increased by 59.8% compared to that of the pristine PI film. The TSDC results and band structure analysis revealed the presence of deeper traps in the terp/PI composites, contributing to the suppression of leakage current and improved charge–discharge efficiency. Furthermore, durability tests confirm the stability of the composite films under extended high-temperature exposure and cycling, establishing their viability for practical applications.

1. Introduction

With the development of electronic systems, increasing new requirements for high-performance dielectric capacitors has become critical [1,2]. Compared to ceramic capacitors, polymer capacitors have attracted extensive research attention due to their advantages of low cost, high electric breakdown field, and ease of fabrication [3]. In high-temperature working environments, such as electric cars and aerospace applications, polymers with high glass transition temperatures (Tg), including polyimide (PI) [4], poly(ether-ether-ketone) (PEEK) [5], polyetherimide (PEI) [6], polyaniline (PANI) [7], and poly(ether-ketone-ketone) (PEKK) [8], are greatly utilized. Among these high-Tg polymers, due to its advantages of high solubility in solvents and ease of processing, PI has been selected as a great candidate for high-temperature capacitor applications. As a representative high-temperature polymer, polyimide (PI) exhibits exceptional glass transition temperatures (Tg) exceeding 360 °C.
However, the rigid conjugated structure on the main carbon chain restricts the motion of dipoles in high-Tg polymers, resulting in relatively low dielectric constants in these polymers. Moreover, due to π-π stacking between conjugated structures in high-Tg polymers, electron transport is prone to occur at elevated temperatures, which leads to relatively high conduction loss [9]. To overcome these issues, composite materials incorporating other dopers to enhance the breakdown field and the energy storage performance of PI polymers have become a cost-effective strategy. For example, incorporating highly dielectric ceramic nanoparticles into a polymer matrix can effectively improve the permittivity of composite films. However, due to the mismatch in the dielectric constants, electric field distortions occur at the filler–polymer interface, leading to high dielectric losses and leakage currents, which cause a reduced electric breakdown field in the composites [10]. Previously, it was demonstrated that the leakage current resulting from dielectric mismatch can be effectively reduced through the surface modification of ceramic fillers, such as PMMA or polydopamine [10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. However, the complex coating process on ceramic fillers is not conducive to mass production [10,11,12,13]. In addition, the dielectric properties of composite films can also be effectively improved by adding wide-bandgap nanofillers, such as boron nitride nanosheets (BNNSs) [14,15], nanodiamonds [16], Al2O3 [17,18,19], and MgO [20,21]. However, the poor compatibility between inorganic fillers and polymers leads to large dispersion and agglomeration, resulting in degradation of the electric breakdown field, which will eventually reduce the energy density of composite films.
Recently, all-organic dielectric composites have attracted great research interest for high-energy density capacitors because of their superior compatibility, fewer interface defects, and high electric breakdown field. In 2019, Zhang et al. mixed PEMEU (poly(ether methyl ether urea)) polymer with PEI to fabricate PEMEU/PEI films using a co-pouring method. With the disruption of hydrogen bonding among PEMEU, the composite film exhibits increased free volumes and enhanced dipole motions, leading to a higher dielectric constant of PEMEU/PEI [22]. In 2021, Zhang et al. reported PI/PEI blended films using a simple solution casting method for high-energy capacitor applications [23]. Due to the different electrical properties of the conjugated structure in the blended films, many defects are eliminated and the free volume is reduced by electrostatic force stacking between the two molecular chains. Compared to pristine PI and PEI, the blend film exhibited an improved breakdown strength of 550 MV/m, up to 200 °C. Similar phenomena were observed in other all-organic blend films, such as PI/PEEU, by Zhang et al. [24]. In 2020, Yuan et al. reported an all-organic hybrid composite consisting of polyether imide (PEI) and a high electron affinity molecular semiconductor [25]. A molecular semiconductor may form electron traps to capture free electrons, which inhibits leakage current and increases the electric breakdown field and energy density of the composite films. However, the slightly large percentage of semiconductor molecules may increase the leakage current of the composite. However, due to the linear dielectric behavior of the PI and PEI polymers, previous studies have shown limited improvements in both the dielectric constant and electric breakdown field. Hence, all organic polymer composites with relatively high dielectric constant and energy density still need to be studied for high-temperature capacitor applications.
Relaxor ferroelectric terpolymers P(VDF-TrFE-CFE) (poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene-chlorofluoroethylene)) exhibit a relatively large dielectric constant of ~60 and a small remnant polarization (Pr). However, due to the relatively low Tg and breakdown field (<350 MV/m) of terpolymer films, their use in high-energy density capacitors is limited, especially at high temperatures [26,27,28,29,30]. Previous research has shown that by introducing polar nanoregions (PNRs) in relaxor ferroelectrics, relaxor ferroelectrics can exhibit a greatly improved saturation polarization (Ps) and an enhanced energy density [26]. In this investigation, a small amount of terpolymer was incorporated into PI substrates to fabricate an all-organic terpolymer/PI (terp/PI) composite film using a solution casting method. Then, we systematically analyzed the microstructure, dielectric constant, and energy storage properties of the terp/PI composite films. The incorporation of a small amount of P(VDF-TrFE-CFE) in the PI substrate can enhance both the dielectric constant and breakdown strength of the terp/PI films. In addition, the introduction of a terpolymer can produce depth traps, which inhibit leakage current, and improve the breakdown electric field of the composite film. Terp/PI composites show great promise for developing high-temperature capacitor materials.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

As shown in Figure 1a, the composite films were prepared using a solution casting method. First, 1.5 g of polyamide acid solution (PAA) (15 wt.%, Saint Marvel, Run Chuan Plastic Materials Co., Changzhou, China) was added to 7.0 mL of N’N-dimethylacetamide (DMF) solvent in a clear glass bottle and was stirred for 4 h at room temperature until it was completely dissolved. Next, based on the mass of PAA powders, 1 wt.%, 5 wt.%, and 10 wt.% P(VDF-TrFE-CFE) powders (59.2/33.6/7.2 mol%, Piezo Tech. Inc., Sarthe, France) were weighed and added to the obtained PAA solution. The mixture was sonicated for 2 h in a water bath at room temperature and then magnetically stirred for an additional 4 h until it was completely dissolved. Next, the terp/PAA solution was cast on a clear glass plate and dried at 60 °C for 24 h. The obtained terp/PAA film was heated at 200 °C for 12 h to remove the residual solvent and moisture. This step is also beneficial to the thermalimide process of the PAA film. Afterwards, the terp/PAA film was heated at 250 °C and 300 °C for 2 h to continue the thermalimide process and obtain the terp/PI film. Finally, the obtained terp/PI films were peeled off in deionized (DI) water from the glass plate and vacuum dried at 60 °C for 24 h. In this investigation, terp/PI composite films with various terpolymer concentrations of 1%, 5%, and 10% were named terp/PI-1, terp/PI-5, and terp/PI-10, respectively. Similarly, pristine PI and terpolymer films were prepared using the solution casting method.

2.2. Characterization of Materials

The surface morphology of the cross-section and the surface of the fabricated composite film was observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (SU 8020, Hitachi High-Tech, Tokyo, Japan), equipped with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the composite films were obtained using an FEI Tecnai G2 F20 (Thermal Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham MA, USA). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the terp/PI films were collected using a Cu Kα source (40 kV, 40 mA) with a scan step size of 0.013° (PANalytical Ltd., Almelo, The Netherlands). Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) was conducted using a DMA Q800 instrument (TA Instruments, Newcastle, DE, USA) in a nitrogen environment, with a heating rate of 5 °C/min. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were performed using a TGA/DSC1 (Mettler-Toledo LLC., Columbus, OH, USA) with a heating rate of 10 °C/min. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was performed using a Bruker Vertex80V instrument (Bruker Corp., Billerica, MA, USA). The ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) data were obtained using a PHI5000 Versa Probe III (ULVAC-PHI, Kanagawa, Japan), with an incident photon of 21.2 eV. A UV–visible light–infrared (UV–VIS–IR) spectrophotometer was used to measure the absorbance, using a UV3600 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).
For the dielectric measurements, gold electrodes, 3 mm in diameter, were sputter coated on both sides of the terp/PI films. The dielectric constant and dielectric loss of the terp/PI films were measured using an LCR meter (Keysight 4980A, Santa Rosa CA, USA) from 1 kHz to 1 MHz. The electric field–polarization (E–P) loops of the terp/PI films were measured at 100 Hz using a Radiant Precision Multiferroic System (Radiant Technologies Inc., Albuquerque, NM, USA) at both room temperature and 150 °C. The thermally stimulated depolarization current (TSDC) was measured using a Keithley 6514 electrometer (Tektronix, Beaverton, OR, USA) and a temperature control test system (Poly k EC1A, Poly K Technologies, PA, USA) from room temperature to 250 °C. Before the TSDC measurement, the film was polarized under a DC electric field of 40 MV/m at 150 °C for 1 h. During the TSDC measurement, the film was slowly heated from 30 °C to 250 °C at a rate of 2 °C/min to record the change in the depolarization current as a function of temperature. The high-temperature durability of the terp/PI composite films was measured via the cyclic charge–discharge of the samples using a Radiant precision multiferroic system under 200 MV/m at 150 °C.
In addition, Multiwfn 3.8 software was used to compute the distribution of the electrostatic potential (ESP) within different ranges of electric potentials at the same level, and several statistical parameters related to the ESP were used in the calculation. Subsequently, color-filled iso-surface graphs for the molecular electrostatic potential were generated using a visual molecular dynamics (VMD) program.

3. Results and Discussion

As shown in the SEM images in Figure 1b, the terpolymer was uniformly dispersed in the PI substrate without obvious phase separation or aggregation. Subsequently, the distribution of elements in the terp/PI composite film was analyzed using EDS (energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry). Figure S1b–d (in the electronic supplementary information, ESI) shows that N, F, and O are uniformly distributed. For the TEM image, the sample was prepared by depositing a diluted solution of terpolymer/PAA on a copper grid followed by drying and thermal annealing in an oven. High-resolution TEM images (Figure 1c) revealed crystalized regions, in which distinct lattice patterns of the terpolymer coexisted with the amorphous PI, and the EDS pattern indicated the presence of polycrystalline terpolymer in the composite film. The images of the fabricated terp/PI-5 film are shown in Figure S1e (ESI). Furthermore, the terp/PI-10 composite film exhibited a noticeable phase separation phenomenon with increasing terpolymer concentration, as depicted in Figure S2. According to previous studies, the phase separation phenomenon may arise from the solubility difference caused by the structural variations between the two types of molecular chains, ultimately resulting in a pronounced phase separation induced by high contents of fillers [26]. Normally, terpolymer molecules tend to form dendritic structures through aggregation during the PAA thermal imidization process [26]. Therefore, excessive terpolymer filler content may lead to phase separation and reduce the breakdown field of terp/PI composites. Therefore, a percentage of less than 10% was employed in the PI substrates to make the terp/PI composites.
Furthermore, the XRD analysis revealed that the spectrum of the pristine PI film exhibited broad amorphous peaks, while the spectrum of the composite film showed a characteristic peak of the α phase for the terpolymer at 18.2°, indicating the successful incorporation of the terpolymer into the PI matrix (Figure 2a) [27,28,29]. The intensity of the characteristic peak at 18.2° increases with increasing terpolymer content in the composite films. The flexibility of the terpolymer chain may additionally reduce the free volume and result in the tighter packing of the PI chains, causing a shift toward higher angles for the amorphous peak of the PI matrix in the XRD pattern [30]. The average chain spacings of the composite films with different terpolymer contents were calculated by employing Bragg’s law, and the results are outlined in Table S1. From the table, the average spaces of the Terp/PI composites decrease with increasing terpolymer content.
The FTIR spectra of the terp/PI composite films are shown in Figure 2b. The data demonstrate that there were no obvious absorption peaks at approximately 1660 cm−1 and 1560 cm−1 in either the PI or terp/PI composite films, indicating that the imidization reaction was complete in the PI film [31]. The absorption peaks at 719 cm−1, 1712 cm−1, and 1776 cm−1 correspond to the bending vibration and the symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibrations of the C=O bond of the imide groups [32], respectively. Furthermore, as shown in Figure S3b (ESI), the terp/PI composite films exhibit a distinct absorption peak at 780 cm−1, which is attributed to the TGTG’ conformation of the α-phase of the terpolymer [28]. In addition, the absorption peak of T3G in the terp/PI composite film at 513 cm−1 moves toward a higher wavenumber [33,34,35,36]. In summary, the FTIR spectra confirmed the absence of any chemical bond formation between the PI film and the terpolymer film, indicating that the terpolymer was present in the terp/PI film through physical blending.
The resulting mechanical properties of the terp/PI films are shown in Figure 3e. The terp/PI-5 film exhibited the highest Young’s modulus herein (3.33 GPa). This is attributed to the reduction in the free volume, which may tighten the packing between the molecular chains and increase the strength of the material. However, as the terpolymer content increased to 10 wt.%, the Young’s modulus decreased to 2.62 GPa. This may result from the weak Young’s modulus of the terpolymer, and the large percentage of low Young’s modulus materials can reduce the Young’s modulus of the composite films. The DMA curve storage loss data are commonly used to characterize the glass transition temperature (Tg) of polymer materials. As shown in Figure 3f, a relaxor loss peak exists near 110 °C for the terp/PI composite film, which is attributed to the increased mobility of the terpolymer. However, the highest relaxor loss is still less than 5% for terp/PI-10, which is still within a reasonable range [29,33]. The inset in Figure 3f shows an enlarged view of the mechanical loss peak. Compared to that of the pristine PI film, the Tg of the terp/PI composite film first increases and then decreases, while that of the Terp/PI-5 composite film shows the highest Tg of 412.8 °C, which is consistent with the Young’s modulus values in Table S2. The high Young’s modulus in the terp/PI composites may significantly reduce the free path of electrons, which can significantly increase the breakdown field of the material. Therefore, the terp/PI-5 film was focused on to investigate high-energy density capacitor applications in this study.
The thermal stability of the terp/PI composite films was subsequently evaluated using TGA. As shown in Figure S4b, the onset decomposition temperature of the film decreases with increasing terpolymer content. This can be attributed to the much lower decomposition temperature of the terpolymer film (Figure S4a, ESI). The thermogravimetry results were quantitatively analyzed using two parameters—a temperature of 10% weight loss and a residual mass ratio at 700 °C (Table S3). These results indicate that the terp/PI-5 film exhibits the highest thermal stability and mechanical strength, which is conducive to avoiding electrical–mechanical breakdown. Therefore, terp/PI-5 is an ideal candidate for applications in high-temperature capacitors.
Afterward, the dielectric properties of the terp/PI composite films were investigated. As shown in Figure 2c, the permittivities of the terp/PI-1, terp/PI-5, and terp/PI-10 films reached 3.51, 3.81, and 4.27, respectively, at 1 kHz, which are 9.3%, 18.7%, and 33% greater than that of pristine PI (3.21). From previous publications, it is known that the dielectric constant of the composite is proportional to the dielectric constants of the substrate and the dopant [37]. Therefore, terp/PI-10 exhibits the highest dielectric constant of all the terp/PI composites (Figure 2c). However, the molecular chain structure of terpolymer differs significantly from that of PI, and their physical mixing can result in phase separation between them when there is a high content of terpolymer. This may reduce the breakdown field of terp/PI composites with a high content of terpolymer. Therefore, our focus was on the terp/PI-5 composite film for the study of high-energy density capacitors.
For the composite film, the dielectric loss became more severe with increasing terpolymer content. However, the dielectric loss of the terp/PI-10 composite film is ~3.5% at 1 MHz, which is slightly higher than that of the terp/PI-5 composite. During this measurement, a 200 g metal piece was placed on top of the holder of an HP LCR meter to ensure good contact between the holder and the composite sample. According to the literature, the high dielectric loss in the terp/PI-10 sample could be caused by the dipole relaxation in the terpolymer [38]. In addition, the data also indicate that the dielectric loss was slightly high at low frequencies, which could be due to the inconsistency of the HP LCR meter at low frequencies (<1 kHz).
Furthermore, the polarization–electric field (P-E) loops of the pristine PI and terp/PI composite films were measured at room temperature; the data are shown in Figure 3a. With increasing terpolymer content, the saturation polarization (Ps) of the terp/PI composites gradually increased, which is consistent with the dielectric constant. The Ps of the terp/PI-5 and terp/PI-10 are 44.3 mC/m2 and 50.1 mC/m2, respectively, indicating increases of 32.6% and 50% compared with that of pristine PI. It is worth noting that the terp/PI-5 composite films demonstrate a lower residual polarization (Pr) than that of pristine PI, which may arise from the tighter package in the PI chain with increasing terpolymer concentration. Furthermore, as the P(VDF-TrFE-CFE) concentration increased to 10%, the Pr of terp/PI-10 gradually increased. This can be attributed to the enhanced polarization loss of the terpolymer, which acts as a relaxor ferroelectric polymer. A reduced Pr is advantageous for enhancing the charging and discharging efficiency of terp/PI composite films. The energy density and charge–discharge efficiency, η, of the terp/PI composite films were calculated based on the P-E loop data; the results are shown in Figure 3b,c. To verify the accuracy of the data on energy density and charge–discharge efficiency, more than five samples of each terp/PI film with various terpolymer contents were measured and the detailed data with error bars are shown in Figure S13a,b (ESI). Due to the higher Ps and lower Pr, under the same electric field conditions, the terp/PI composite film exhibited higher Ud and η. Accordingly, as shown in Figure 3b, the pristine PI exhibited an energy density of 6.05 J/cm3 and an efficiency of 68.5% at 500 MV/m. In contrast, terp/PI-1, terp/PI-5, and terp/PI-10 exhibited energy densities of 8.91 J/cm3, 9.67 J/cm3, and 9.29 J/cm3, representing increases of 47.3%, 59.8%, and 53.5%, respectively. Therefore, the terp/PI-5 film exhibited the highest energy density (9.67 J/cm3) and a relatively high charge–discharge efficiency (84.7%) among the terp/PI composite films. This may result from the increased dielectric constant and the highest breakdown field.
Subsequently, we employed the Weibull distribution equation to analyze the breakdown strength of the PI-based composite materials, which is expressed as follows:
P E = 1 e E E b β
where E is the measured breakdown strength under an alternating current (AC) field, Eb is the characteristic breakdown field at which 63.2% of the samples fail, β is a shape parameter that reflects the dispersion range of the measurement data, and P(E) represents the cumulative probability of failure for the tested samples [19]. As depicted in Figure 3d, the Eb values of terp/PI-1, terp/PI-5, and terp/PI-10 increased from 502.7 to 553.2, 604.7, and 557.8 MV/m, respectively, representing increases of 10.05%, 20.29%, and 10.96%, respectively, compared with that of the pristine PI film, indicating that the addition of the terpolymer enhances the breakdown strength of the terp/PI films.
The P-E loops of the terp/PI films were measured at 150 °C and the data are shown in Figure 4a. The data indicate that the breakdown field of terp/PI-5 achieved the highest value of 466.4 MV/m, which is 25.2% greater than that of the pristine PI film at 150 °C. Similarly, the E–P loops of the pristine PI film and terp/PI films at 200 MV/m (Figure 4b) show that the PI film exhibits a very high loss at high temperatures, which may increase the dielectric loss and result in thermal breakdown. In contrast, the terp/PI films exhibit a slender hysteresis loop, while maintaining a low Pr value. Afterward, the energy density and charge–discharge efficiency were determined based on the E–P loops at 150 °C (Figure S6). As shown in Figure 4b, the energy density of the terp/PI-5 film reached 5.06 J/cm3 at 475 MV/m, which is an 87.4% improvement compared to that of pristine PI (2.7 J/cm3) at 150 °C. As shown in Figure 4c, the charge–discharge efficiency is 95.6% at 200 MV/m for the terp/PI-5 film, which is 15.6% higher than that of pristine PI at the same electric field. These results suggest that the incorporation of the terpolymer in the PI substrates can successfully attenuate the electrical conductivity loss of the PI substrate at high temperatures and improve the energy density of the composite films. In addition, the data indicate that the charge–discharge efficiency of the terp/PI film significantly decreases when the electric field exceeds 300 MV/m at 150 °C. From previous publications, the discrepancy in dielectric constants between PVDF-based polymers and PI may cause the accumulation of electric fields at the interface between the electrode and dielectric material, leading to an enhanced injection of electrons under high temperature and high electric field conditions [39]. The breakdown field and charge–discharge efficiency of terp/PI films at high temperature could be reduced by this effect. Furthermore, the breakdown field of the terp/PI composite film was analyzed using Weibull distribution and the data are shown in Figure 4d. The data indicate that the breakdown field (Eb) of the pristine PI sharply decreased to 372.4 MV/m at 150 °C. Meanwhile, the Eb of terp/PI-5 reached 466.4 MV/m, which is 25.2% higher than that of pristine PI film. This is consistent with the P-E loop data.
As a commonly used high Tg polymer, the presence of imide groups in the backbone of PI films results in excellent mechanical and thermal stability. However, the π-π stacking interactions between imide rings may reversely lead to charge conduction, resulting in a noticeable increase in the electrical conductivity of PI at high temperature, which may significantly increase the conduction loss of the material and reduce its efficiency [9,40]. Typically, to elucidate the mechanism behind the enhanced efficiency of terp/PI composite films, the electrical conductivity of the terp/PI composite films was measured at 150 °C using a Radiant Precision Multiferroic System; the data are shown in Figure 4e. The data were fitted using Schottky emission fitting software under a low electric field. The details of the conductive model are described in the ESI. Under a low electric field (<200 MV/m), the conduction mechanism of the pristine PI and terp/PI films obeyed the Schottky emission mechanism, as shown in Figure S8 and Table S4 (ESI). Therefore, with increasing electric field, the conductive model changed from the Schottky emission model to the trap-limited hopping conduction model for both pristine PI and terp/PI films [25,41,42,43]. Based on previous research, this may be attributed to the trap sites formed by the terpolymer in the terp/PI composites. These trap sites may capture the electrons injected from the electrode to generate an internal electric field, in opposition to the applied electric field. Therefore, electron injection via Schottky emission is further suppressed [25]. At a higher electric field (E > 200 MV/m), the hopping conduction model was utilized to simulate the conductivity current of the terp/PI composites using Equation (S3) (ESI); the fitting results are shown by the dash line in Figure 4e. From the fitting results, the obtained jump distances, λ, for pristine PI and the terp/PI-1, terp/PI-5, and terp/PI-10 films were 1.89 nm, 1.79 nm, 1.47 nm, and 1.84 nm, respectively. Due to the shorter distance between the trap sites in the terp/PI films, the suppression of leakage current and reduction in conductance loss are more effective [42,44,45].
In the hopping conduction model, carriers must acquire energy that is equal to the trap depth to reach the conduction current. The energy required by the carrier to overcome the trap barrier is called the conductive activation energy. Therefore, the conductivity activation energy can reflect the trap depth of a material [18]. The change in electrical conductivity with temperature follows the Arrhenius model, as follows [25,44]:
σ T = σ 0 × e ( A q T k b )
where σ(T) is the conductivity at different temperatures, σ0 is the prefactor, A is the conductive activation energy (eV), T is the temperature, kb is the Boltzmann constant, and q is the electric charge. The conductivity activation energy can be obtained using the fitted slope of the conductivity as a function of the reciprocal of temperature. Figure 4f shows the fitted results obtained using the Arrhenius model for the conductivity activation energy of the terp/PI composite films at different temperatures under 200 MV/m. From the fitting results, the conductivity activation energies of pristine PI, terp/PI-1, terp/PI-5, and terp/PI-10 are 0.42 eV, 0.54 eV, 0.66 eV, and 0.52 eV, respectively. This means that the addition of the terpolymer to the terp/PI films results in higher activation energies, indicating an increased energy barrier. In addition, terp/PI-5 exhibited the highest conductivity activation energy, which may have resulted in a higher breakdown field and lower leakage current.
The thermally stimulated depolarization current (TSDC) is always used for evaluating the release of trapped charges during the heating process. The TSDC data can provide valuable insights into the energy levels and distribution of traps within the material [46]. As depicted in Figure 5a, the pristine PI film exhibited a single depolarization process, whereas the terp/PI-5 composite films displayed two depolarization processes. First, the low-temperature peak at approximately 50 °C for the terp/PI-5 composite film is associated with the dipole relaxation of the terpolymer. The high temperature depolarization of the terp/PI-5 composite at 171.52 °C is related to the charge release process in the trapped sites [47].
Compared to that of pristine PI films (151.52 °C), the depolarization temperature (TP) of the terp/PI-5 composite films shifted to a higher temperature peak of 171.52 °C, indicating that the addition of the terpolymer introduces deeper trap levels in the PI substrate [18,19,25]. According to the TSDC curve, the average trap depth (ETSDC) and trapped charge (QTSDC) of the sample can be calculated using the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the discharge peak; the equation can be expressed as follows [40,42]:
E T S D C = 2.47 k b T P 2 Δ T
Q T S D C = 60 υ T 0 T 1 I ( T ) d T
where kb is the Boltzmann constant, TP is the depolarization current, ΔT is the FWHM of the discharge current peak, ν is the heating rate (2 K/min), and T0 and T1 are the starting and ending temperatures of the depolarization current peaks, respectively. According to Equations (3) and (4), the calculated ETSDC for PI and terp/PI-5 are 0.39 and 0.64 eV, respectively, and the QTSDC are 12.03 and 19.69 nC, respectively. The TSDC results indicate that adding terpolymer to the PI film can form deeper traps, as well as additional carrier traps, which can effectively reduce the conductance loss and eventually enhance the energy density and efficiency of the terp/PI composite [48].
Based on the experimental results, Multiwfn software was used to simulate the distribution of the surface electrostatic potential (ESP) of the terpolymer and PI film and to determine a more comprehensive profile for the formation of deep traps in terp/PI composites. The simulation results (Figure 5b and Figure S9) indicate that the terpolymer molecule exhibits a large percentage of the positive charge on its surface compared to the PI molecular structure [25,49]. This suggests that the terpolymer has a stronger affinity for electron capture as an effective trap site [50].
Subsequently, the band structures of the PI and terpolymer were analyzed using UV–Vis–NIR) and UV photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS). As shown in Figure S10a,b, the calculated band gaps (Eg) for the PI film and terpolymer film are 2.83 eV and 3.24 eV, respectively. Therefore, the ionization energies (ϕIP) of both the PI and P(VDF-TrFE-CFE) films were calculated using the following equation [42]:
ϕ I P = h v ( E c u t o f f E h o m o )
where hv is the incident light energy (21.2 eV) from the UV–Vis equipment, Ecutoff is the transaction energy of secondary electrons, and Ehomo represents the lowest energy required to bind electrons in the dielectric material [39,46]. The electron affinity Ea can be calculated based on the following equation [25]:
E a = ϕ I P E g
The calculated results are presented in Figure 5c. From the data, the electron affinity energies of PI and P(VDF-TrFE-CFE) are −2.36 eV and −3.23 eV, respectively, which is consistent with the simulation results of the surface electrostatic potential distribution for both polymer structures. As shown in the schematic for the energy band structure illustrated in Figure 5d, the terpolymer material first captures excited electrons from the PI material due to its high electron affinity. This is attributed to the strong electrostatic attraction from the trap levels in the terpolymer film, which can effectively inhibit conductivity loss and enhance the energy density and charge–discharge efficiency of the terp/PI composites. The band structure of the interface of the terp/PI composite material is illustrated in Figure S11 (ESI), where ΔEa represents the trap energy level (0.87 eV), which was calculated from the difference in electron affinities between these two materials. In general, the above results confirmed that a moderate amount of terpolymer can create energy traps in the PI film, which may significantly inhibit charge injection and transport and effectively reduce conduction losses at high temperatures in terp/PI composites [51].
In addition, the durability for the electric breakdown field of the Terp/PI-5 composite film was measured based on the E–P loop data at 150 °C. First, the energy density of Terp/PI-5 was tested under different holding periods. As shown by the E–P loop data in Figure S12, there were no significant decreases in either the energy density or charge–discharge efficiency of the sample after being stored at 150 °C for 90 min. Subsequently, the thermal stability of the nanocomposite film was measured by repeatedly charging and discharging the sample at 150 °C for 20,000 cycles. As shown in Figure 6a, the energy density of terp/PI-5 remains at 1.17 J/cm3 after 20,000 charge–discharge cycles at 150 °C at 200 MV/m, which is a decrease of 7.1% compared to the value (1.26 J/cm3) before the measurement. Moreover, a charge–discharge efficiency of 93.9% was maintained after the measurement. The results indicate that the terp/PI-5 composite exhibits excellent durability and reliability at high temperature (150 °C). Furthermore, Table S5 shows a summary of the energy density of the terp/PI film compared to recently published results for PI-based films at high temperature (150 °C) [13,19,27,33,48,52,53,54,55,56]. The results indicate that the terp/PI film exhibits superior energy density and electric breakdown field at high temperature. Therefore, terp/PI composite films show great promise for high energy density capacitor applications at high temperatures.

4. Conclusions

In this investigation, a small amount of relaxor ferroelectric terpolymer (P(VDF-TrFE-CFE)) has been incorporated into polyimide (PI) substrates to create all-organic terpolymer/PI (terp/PI) composite films for high-energy density capacitor applications. The permittivities of the terp/PI-1, terp/PI-5, and terp/PI-10 reached 3.51, 3.81, and 4.27, respectively, at 1 kHz, which are 9.3%, 18.7%, and 33% greater than that of pristine PI (3.21). The terp/PI-5 film exhibited the highest Young’s modulus, herein, among terp/PI composites. Therefore, terp/PI-5 film was focused on to investigate high-energy density capacitor application. The terp/PI-5 film exhibited the highest energy density (9.67 J/cm3) and a relatively high charge–discharge efficiency (84.7%). The energy density of the terp/PI-5 film was increased by 59.8% compared to that of the pristine PI film. This may result from the increased dielectric constant and the highest breakdown field. As depicted in Figure 4b, the energy density of the terp/PI-5 film reached 5.06 J/cm3 at 475 MV/m at 150 °C, which is an 87.4% improvement compared to that of pristine PI (2.7 J/cm3). The TSDC results and band structure analysis revealed the presence of deeper traps in the terp/PI composites, contributing to the suppression of leakage current and improved charge–discharge efficiency. The terp/PI composite films exhibited remarkable stability under high temperatures, making them promising candidates for applications in high-performance capacitors. This study creates a new approach using a small amount of relaxor ferroelectric polymer doping in PI substrates to produce capacitor materials with high-energy density and improved breakdown field at high temperatures.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym16081138/s1, Figure S1: (a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of cross-section of Terp/PI-5; and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) images of Terp/PI-5 of (b) N, (c) F, and (d) O elements. Actual optical images of (e1) pristine PI, (e2) Terp/PI-1, (e3) Terp/PI-5, (e4) Terp/PI-10 films; Figure S2: SEM images of (a) PI and Terp/PI composite films with different terpolymer contents (b) Terp/PI-1, (c) Terp/PI-5, (d) Terp/PI-10; Figure S3: FTIR spectra of (a) P(VDF-TrFE-CFE) film, (b) Terp/PI composite films with various terpolymer contents; Figure S4: (a) Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves of P(VDF-TrFE-CFE), (b) TGA curves of Terp/PI composite films with various terpolymer contents; Figure S5: Dielectric constant and dielectric loss of P(VDF-TrFE-CFE) terpolymer film; Figure S6: P-E loop at room temperature of (a) pristine PI, (b) Terp/PI-1, (c) Terp/PI-5, (d) Terp/PI-10 films; Figure S7: P-E loops data measured at 150 °C of (a) pristine PI, (b) Terp/PI-1,(c) Terp/PI-5, (d) Terp/PI-10 films; Figure S8: Fitting results for the current density as a function of electric field for the pristine PI and Terp/PI films at 150 °C using Schottky emission model; Figure S9: Statistical results for the electrostatic potential distribution on the molecular surface of (a) pristine PI and (b) P(VDF-TrFE-CFE) terpolymer; Figure S10: (a) Ultraviolet-visible light-near infrared (UV-Vis-NIR), (b) plot of (αhν)0.5 vs. hν data acquired from the UV-Vis-NIR spectra, (c) and (d) Binding energy obtained from ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) of pristine PI and P(VDF-TrFE-CFE); Figure S11: Energy band diagrams at the interface between terpolymer filler and PI substrate in the Terp/PI composite film; Figure S12: P-E loop of the Terp/PI-5 film after the film was heated at 150 °C for (a) 30min, (b) 60 min, and (c) 90 min. (d) Calculated energy density and charge-discharge efficiency of Terp/PI-5 at 150 °C; Figure S13: The scatter whiskers (error) of calculated (a) energy density and (b) charge-discharge efficiency at 25 °C. The scatter whiskers (error) of calculated (c) energy density and (d) charge-discharge efficiency at 150 °C; Figure S14: Bipolar P-E loop at room temperature of (a) pristine PI, (b) Terp/PI-1, (c) Terp/PI-5, (d) Terp/PI-10 films; Figure S15: Bipolar P-E loop at 150 °C of (a) pristine PI, (b) Terp/PI-1, (c) Terp/PI-5, (d) Terp/PI-10 films; Figure S16: (a) P-E loop and (b) Weibull distribution of breakdown electric field of P(VDF-TrFE-CFE) film at room temperature; Table S1: Average chain space in Terp/PI composite films with different terpolymer contents; Table S2: Young’s modulus and glass transition temperature (Tg) of Terp/PI composites obtained from dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) data; Table S3: Summary of TGA data for Terp/PI composite with various terpolymer contents; Table S4: Comparison data for the energy density for different PI-based composite at 150 °C. Table S5: The fitting results of the Schottky emission mechanism.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.R.; Methodology, X.C. and X.Z.; Investigation, K.R.; Resources, K.R.; Data curation, C.W. and Y.S.; Writing—original draft, C.W.; Writing—review & editing, K.R.; Project administration, K.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 52172082 and No. 51571035 and the National Key Research and Development project from the Ministry of Science and Technology in China under Grant No. 2021YFB3200303.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available by request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors claim that they have no conflict of interest except for the fact that they have applied for a related patent.

References

  1. Hu, H.; Zhang, F.; Luo, S.; Chang, W.; Yue, J.; Wang, C.H. Recent advances in rational design of polymer nanocomposite dielectrics for energy storage. Nano Energy 2020, 74, 104844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, H.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Q. Dielectric polymers for high-temperature capacitive energy storage. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 6369–6400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, G.; Li, Q.; Allahyarov, E.; Li, Y.; Zhu, L. Challenges and opportunities of polymer nanodielectrics for capacitive energy storage. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 37939–37960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zha, J.W.; Tian, Y.; Zheng, M.S.; Wan, B.; Yang, X.; Chen, G. High-temperature energy storage polyimide dielectric materials: Polymer multiple-structure design. Mater. Today Energy 2023, 31, 101217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wei, J.; Ju, T.; Huang, W.; Song, J.; Yan, N.; Wang, F.; Shen, A.; Li, Z.; Zhu, L. High dielectric constant dipolar glass polymer based on sulfonylated poly(ether ether ketone). Polymer 2019, 178, 121688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Feng, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Q.; Chi, Q. Ultrahigh discharge efficiency and excellent energy density in oriented core-shell nanofiber-polyetherimide composites. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 25, 180–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Panaitescu, D.M.; Popa, M.S.; Ciuprina, F.; Enache, L.; Frone, A.N.; Nicolae, C.A.; Gabor, A.R.; Trusca, R.; Raditoiu, V.; Trica, B.; et al. Role of polyaniline coating on nanosilica particles in polyvinylidene fluoride nanocomposites for energy storage. Surf. Interfaces 2023, 36, 102546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Q.; Yao, F.Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, G.; Wang, H.; Wang, Q. High-temperature dielectric materials for electrical energy storage. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2018, 48, 219–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Feng, Q.-K.; Zhong, S.-L.; Pei, J.-Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, D.-L.; Liu, D.-F.; Zhang, Y.-X.; Dang, Z.-M. Recent progress and future prospects on all-organic polymer dielectrics for energy storage capacitors. Chem. Rev. 2021, 122, 3820–3878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cao, X.; Wang, C.; Han, K.; Lu, X.; Luo, N.; Ren, K. Lead-free AgNbO3/poly(vinylidene fluoride-hexafluoropropylene) antiferroelectric nanocomposite for high energy density capacitor applications. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2021, 54, 405501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, D.; Ni, Y.; Kong, X.; Gao, D.; Wang, Y.; Hu, T.; Zhang, L. Mussel-inspired modification of boron nitride for natural rubber composites with high thermal conductivity and low dielectric constant. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2019, 177, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xie, X.; Tian, J.; Cao, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Z.; Ren, K. Ultralow-Content (Bi0.5Na0.5) TiO3–NaNbO3/PVDF-HFP Nanocomposites for Ultrahigh-Energy-Density Capacitor Applications. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5, 7651–7660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, S.; Ren, K. 2D MoS2 nanosheet-based polyimide nanocomposite with high energy density for high temperature capacitor applications. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2021, 306, 2100079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dai, Z.; Bao, Z.; Ding, S.; Liu, C.; Sun, H.; Wang, H.; Zhou, X.; Wang, Y.; Yin, Y.; Li, X. Scalable Polyimide-Poly(Amic Acid) Copolymer Based Nanocomposites for High-Temperature Capacitive Energy Storage. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2101976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, Q.; Chen, L.; Gadinski, M.R.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, G.; Li, H.U.; Iagodkine, E.; Haque, A.; Chen, L.-Q.; Jackson, T.N.; et al. Flexible high-temperature dielectric materials from polymer nanocomposites. Nature 2015, 523, 576–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, C.; Cao, X.; Tian, J.; Yu, F.; Jiang, F.; Ren, K. Significantly enhanced energy density of nanodiamond/polyimide composites at high temperatures with ultralow nanodiamond contents. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2023, 66, 956–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, W.; Zhu, X.; Niu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, Z. Crosslinked polyetherimide nanocomposites with superior energy storage achieved via trace Al2O3 nanoparticles. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2022, 223, 109421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, T.; Chen, X.; Thakur, Y.; Lu, B.; Zhang, Q.; Runt, J.; Zhang, Q.M. A highly scalable dielectric metamaterial with superior capacitor performance over a broad temperature. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaax6622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ai, D.; Li, H.; Zhou, Y.; Ren, L.; Han, Z.; Yao, B.; Zhou, W.; Zhao, L.; Xu, J.; Wang, Q. Tuning nanofillers in in situ prepared polyimide nanocomposites for high-temperature capacitive energy storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1903881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhou, Y.; Yuan, C.; Wang, S.; Zhu, Y.; Cheng, S.; Yang, X.; Yang, Y.; Hu, J.; He, J.; Li, Q. Interface-modulated nanocomposites based on polypropylene for high-temperature energy storage. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 28, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, S.S.; Hu, J.; Gao, L.; Zhou, Y.; Peng, S.M.; He, J.L.; Dang, Z.M. Enhanced breakdown strength and energy density in PVDF nanocomposites with functionalized MgO nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 33599–33605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, Q.; Chen, X.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, Q.M. Giant permittivity materials with low dielectric loss over a broad temperature range enabled by weakening intermolecular hydrogen bonds. Nano Energy 2019, 64, 103916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, Q.; Chen, X.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, T.; Lu, W.; Chen, Z.; Liu, Z.; Kim, S.H.; Donovan, B.; Warzoha, R.J.; et al. High-temperature polymers with record-high breakdown strength enabled by rationally designed chain-packing behavior in blends. Matter 2021, 4, 2448–2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ahmad, A.; Tong, H.; Fan, T.; Xu, J. All-organic polymer blend dielectrics of poly (arylene ether urea) and polyimide: Toward high energy density and high temperature applications. J. Polym. Sci. 2021, 59, 1414–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yuan, C.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Liang, J.; Wang, S.; Peng, S.; Li, Y.; Cheng, S.; Yang, M.; Hu, J.; et al. Polymer/molecular semiconductor all-organic composites for high-temperature dielectric energy storage. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yang, D.; Tian, J.; Tian, S.; Yu, F.; Ren, K. Composition design of BNBT-ST relaxor ferroelectric ceramics in superparaelectric state with ultrahigh energy density. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 27750–27757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Feng, Q.-K.; Liu, D.-F.; Zhang, Y.-X.; Pei, J.-Y.; Zhong, S.-L.; Hu, H.-Y.; Wang, X.-J.; Dang, Z.-M. Significantly improved high-temperature charge-discharge efficiency of all-organic polyimide composites by suppressing space charges. Nano Energy 2022, 99, 107410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, C.; Shi, L.; Yang, W.; Zhou, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, C.; Yang, Y. All polymer dielectric films for achieving high energy density film capacitors by blending poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene-chlorofluoroethylene) with aromatic polythiourea. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Venkatesan, T.R.; Wübbenhorst, M.; Gerhard, R. Structure-property relationships in three-phase relaxor-ferroelectric terpolymers. Ferroelectrics 2021, 586, 60–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, S.; Neese, B.; Ren, K.; Chu, B.; Zhang, Q.M. Microstructure and electromechanical responses in semicrystalline ferroelectric relaxor polymer blends. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 100, 044113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ramani, R.; Das, V.; Singh, A.; Ramachandran, R.; Amarendra, G.; Alam, S. Free Volume Study on the Origin of Dielectric Constant in a Fluorine-Containing Polyimide Blend: Poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoro propylene)/Poly(ether imide). J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 12282–12296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Feng, Q.K.; Dong, Q.; Zhang, D.L.; Pei, J.Y.; Dang, Z.M. Enhancement of high-temperature dielectric energy storage performances of polyimide nanocomposites utilizing surface functionalized MAX nanosheets. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2022, 218, 109193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, P.; Guo, Y.; Zhou, D.; Li, D.; Pang, L.; Liu, W.; Su, J.; Shi, Z.; Sun, S. High-temperature flexible nanocomposites with ultra-high energy storage density by nanostructured MgO fillers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2204155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, S.; Chu, B.; Neese, B.; Ren, K.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, Q.M. Direct spectroscopic evidence of field-induced solid-state chain conformation transformation in a ferroelectric relaxor polymer. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 99, 044107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhao, X.L.; Wang, J.L.; Tian, B.B.; Liu, B.L.; Wang, X.D.; Sun, S.; Zou, Y.H.; Lin, T.; Sun, J.L.; Meng, X.J.; et al. Enhanced piezoelectric response in the artificial ferroelectric polymer multilayers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 222907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, Y.; Yin, D.; Zhong, C.; Xiong, R.; Shi, J.; Liu, Z.; Wang, X.; Lei, Q. Surface morphology and raman analysis of the polyimide film aged under bipolar pulse voltage. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2013, 53, 1536–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, C.; Zhang, J.; Gong, S.; Ren, K. Significantly enhanced breakdown field for core-shell structured poly(vinylidene fluoride-hexafluoropropylene)/TiO2 nanocomposites for ultra-high energy density capacitor applications. J. Appl. Phys. 2018, 124, 154103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, G.; Zhang, S.; Jiang, W.; Cao, W. Losses in ferroelectric materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2015, 89, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ju, T.; Chen, X.; Langhe, D.; Ponting, M.; Baer, E.; Zhu, L. Enhancing breakdown strength and lifetime of multilayer dielectric films by using high temperature polycarbonate skin layers. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 45, 494–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tu, S.; Jiang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Alshareef, H.N. Large dielectric constant enhancement in MXene percolative polymer composites. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 3369–3377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, X.J.; Zheng, M.S.; Wang, Q.; Chen, G.; Zha, J.W. Enhancement of high temperature capacitive performance of sulfone-containing polyimide by suppressing carrier transport. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2022, 121, 243902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dong, J.; Li, L.; Qiu, P.; Pan, Y.; Niu, Y.; Sun, L.; Pan, Z.; Liu, Y.; Tan, L.; Xu, X.; et al. Scalable polyimide-organosilicate hybrid films for high-temperature capacitive energy storage. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2211487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Li, H.; Chang, B.S.; Kim, H.; Xie, Z.; Lainé, A.; Ma, L.; Xu, T.; Yang, C.; Kwon, J.; Shelton, S.W.; et al. High-performing polysulfate dielectrics for electrostatic energy storage under harsh conditions. Joule 2023, 7, 95–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Cheng, S.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Y.; Yuan, C.; Yang, M.; Fu, J.; Hu, J.; He, J.; Li, Q. Polymer dielectrics sandwiched by medium-dielectric-constant nanoscale deposition layers for high-temperature capacitive energy storage. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 42, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yang, M.; Wang, S.; Fu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Liang, J.; Cheng, S.; Hu, S.; Hu, J.; He, J.; Li, Q. Quantum size effect to induce colossal high-temperature energy storage density and efficiency in polymer/inorganic cluster composites. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2301936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yuan, C.; Liu, D.-D.; Zhu, Y.-J.; Zeng, T.; Jiang, B.-X.; Tang, C.-X.; Zhou, Y.; He, J.-L.; Li, Q. Effect of charge transport on electrical degradation in polypropylene/organic molecular semiconductor composites for HVDC cable insulation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2023, 122, 112904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, L.; Dong, J.; Hu, R.; Chen, X.; Niu, Y.; Wang, H. Wide-bandgap fluorides/polyimide composites with enhanced energy storage properties at high temperatures. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 435, 135059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Niu, Y.; Dong, J.; He, Y.; Xu, X.; Li, S.; Wu, K.; Wang, Q.; Wang, H. Significantly enhancing the discharge efficiency of sandwich-structured polymer dielectrics at elevated temperature by building carrier blocking interface. Nano Energy 2022, 97, 107215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, R.; Xu, H.; Cheng, S.; Liang, J.; Gou, B.; Zhou, J.; Fu, J.; Xie, C.; He, J.; Li, Q. Ultrahigh-energy-density dielectric materials from ferroelectric polymer/glucose all-organic composites with a cross-linking network of hydrogen bonds. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 49, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, M.; Zhu, B.; Zhang, X.; Tan, S.; Gong, H.; Wei, X.; Zhang, Z. High energy storage density and low energy loss achieved by inserting charge traps in all organic dielectric materials. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 16258–16267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zheng, W.; Ren, L.; Zhao, X.; Li, H.; Xie, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Yu, L.; Yang, L.; Liao, R. Tuning interfacial relaxations in P (VDF-HFP) with Al2O3@ ZrO2 core-shell nanofillers for enhanced dielectric and energy storage performance. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2022, 222, 109379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hu, P.; Sun, W.; Fan, M.; Qian, J.; Jiang, J.; Dan, Z.; Lin, Y.; Nan, C.-W.; Li, M.; Shen, Y. Large energy density at high-temperature and excellent thermal stability in polyimide nanocomposite contained with small loading of BaTiO3 nanofibers. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 458, 743–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chi, Q.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Q.; Wang, X.; Lei, Q. Excellent energy storage properties with high-temperature stability in sandwich-structured polyimide-based composite films. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 7, 748–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wu, Z.; Zhou, H.; Guo, Q.; Liu, Z.; Gong, L.; Zhang, Q.; Zhong, G.; Li, Z.; Chen, Y. Enhanced dielectric properties in polyimide nanocomposites containing barium titanate@ polydopamine core-shell nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 845, 156171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yu, S.; Liu, Y.; Ding, C.; Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Wu, D.; Luo, H.; Chen, S. All-organic sandwich structured polymer dielectrics with polyimide and PVDF for high temperature capacitor application. J. Energy Storage 2023, 62, 106868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ahmad, A.; Tong, H.; Fan, T.; Xu, J. Binary polymer blend of ArPTU/PI with advanced comprehensive dielectric properties and ultra-high thermally stability. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021, 138, 50997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the fabrication process of the Terp/PI nanocomposite film, (b) scanning electron microscopy image of the cross-sectional surface morphology, and (c) transmission electron microscopy image of the Terp/PI-5 film.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the fabrication process of the Terp/PI nanocomposite film, (b) scanning electron microscopy image of the cross-sectional surface morphology, and (c) transmission electron microscopy image of the Terp/PI-5 film.
Polymers 16 01138 g001
Figure 2. (a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns, the arrow represents the direction of movement of the amorphous peak. (b) Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of pristine PI and terp/PI composite films. (c) Dielectric constant and (d) dielectric loss of Terp/PI composite films with various terpolymer contents at different frequencies.
Figure 2. (a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns, the arrow represents the direction of movement of the amorphous peak. (b) Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of pristine PI and terp/PI composite films. (c) Dielectric constant and (d) dielectric loss of Terp/PI composite films with various terpolymer contents at different frequencies.
Polymers 16 01138 g002
Figure 3. (a) P−E loops, (b) energy density, (c) charge−discharge efficiency, and (d) Weibull distribution for the electric breakdown field of the terp/PI films with different contents at room temperature, the arrows represent the specific result of Weibull distribution, in which arrows represent the breakdown fields and shape parameters of the terp/PI composite films with various terpolymer contents. (e) Young’s modulus and (f) mechanical loss factor measured using DMA.
Figure 3. (a) P−E loops, (b) energy density, (c) charge−discharge efficiency, and (d) Weibull distribution for the electric breakdown field of the terp/PI films with different contents at room temperature, the arrows represent the specific result of Weibull distribution, in which arrows represent the breakdown fields and shape parameters of the terp/PI composite films with various terpolymer contents. (e) Young’s modulus and (f) mechanical loss factor measured using DMA.
Polymers 16 01138 g003
Figure 4. (a) P−E loop at 200 MV/m, (b) energy density and (c) charge−discharge efficiency, and (d) Weibull distribution for the electric breakdown field of the terp/PI composite films measured at 150 °C. (e) Fitted results of the current density as a function of the applied electric field at 150 °C for the pristine PI and terp/PI films using the hopping conduction model. (f) Fitted results for the conductivity as a function of reciprocal of temperature for the pristine PI and terp/PI composites measured at 200 MV m−1 using the Arrhenius function.
Figure 4. (a) P−E loop at 200 MV/m, (b) energy density and (c) charge−discharge efficiency, and (d) Weibull distribution for the electric breakdown field of the terp/PI composite films measured at 150 °C. (e) Fitted results of the current density as a function of the applied electric field at 150 °C for the pristine PI and terp/PI films using the hopping conduction model. (f) Fitted results for the conductivity as a function of reciprocal of temperature for the pristine PI and terp/PI composites measured at 200 MV m−1 using the Arrhenius function.
Polymers 16 01138 g004
Figure 5. (a) Thermal stimulated discharge current curves of the PI and terp/PI-5 films. (b) Simulation results of the electrostatic potential distribution on the molecular surface of PI and P(VDF−TrFE−CFE). (c) Schematic drawing of the energy band diagram for the PI and P(VDF−TrFE−CFE) films. (d) Schematic band diagram for the interface between the terpolymer and the PI substrate in the composite.
Figure 5. (a) Thermal stimulated discharge current curves of the PI and terp/PI-5 films. (b) Simulation results of the electrostatic potential distribution on the molecular surface of PI and P(VDF−TrFE−CFE). (c) Schematic drawing of the energy band diagram for the PI and P(VDF−TrFE−CFE) films. (d) Schematic band diagram for the interface between the terpolymer and the PI substrate in the composite.
Polymers 16 01138 g005
Figure 6. (a) Reliability test for the Terp/PI-5 composite film at 200 MV/m and 150 °C. (b) Comparison of the energy storage properties of the Terp/PI composites and other PI-based high-temperature dielectrics at 150 °C.
Figure 6. (a) Reliability test for the Terp/PI-5 composite film at 200 MV/m and 150 °C. (b) Comparison of the energy storage properties of the Terp/PI composites and other PI-based high-temperature dielectrics at 150 °C.
Polymers 16 01138 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, C.; Shen, Y.; Cao, X.; Zheng, X.; Ren, K. High Energy Density in All-Organic Polyimide-Based Composite Film by Doping of Polyvinylidene Fluoride-Based Relaxor Ferroelectrics. Polymers 2024, 16, 1138. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16081138

AMA Style

Wang C, Shen Y, Cao X, Zheng X, Ren K. High Energy Density in All-Organic Polyimide-Based Composite Film by Doping of Polyvinylidene Fluoride-Based Relaxor Ferroelectrics. Polymers. 2024; 16(8):1138. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16081138

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Chengwei, Yue Shen, Xiaodan Cao, Xin Zheng, and Kailiang Ren. 2024. "High Energy Density in All-Organic Polyimide-Based Composite Film by Doping of Polyvinylidene Fluoride-Based Relaxor Ferroelectrics" Polymers 16, no. 8: 1138. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16081138

APA Style

Wang, C., Shen, Y., Cao, X., Zheng, X., & Ren, K. (2024). High Energy Density in All-Organic Polyimide-Based Composite Film by Doping of Polyvinylidene Fluoride-Based Relaxor Ferroelectrics. Polymers, 16(8), 1138. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16081138

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop