Next Article in Journal
New Advances on the Dispersive and Polar Surface Properties of Poly(styrene-co-butadiene) Using Inverse Gas Chromatography
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigation of γ-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES)-Modified Halloysite Nanotubes on the Reinforcement of Halloysite/Polypropylene (PP) Nanocomposites
Previous Article in Journal
Enhanced Thermal Conductivity of Thermoplastic Polyimide Nanocomposites: Effect of Using Hexagonal Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Water-Soluble Polyglycidol-Grafted Ladder Calix Resorcinarene Oligomers with Open Chain and Cyclic Topologies: Synthesis, Characteristics, and Biological Evaluation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Eco-Friendly Castor Oil-Based Composite with High Clam Shell Powder Content

1
Hubei Key Laboratory of Purification and Application of Plant Anti-Cancer Active Ingredients, College of Chemistry and Life Sciences, Hubei University of Education, Wuhan 430205, China
2
College of Chemistry, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
3
Department of Chemistry Education, University of Education, Winneba P.O. Box 25, Ghana
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2024, 16(23), 3232; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16233232
Submission received: 1 October 2024 / Revised: 15 November 2024 / Accepted: 18 November 2024 / Published: 21 November 2024

Abstract

:
Eco-friendly castor oil-based composites with a high content of clam shell powder were prepared in this study. Biomass composites were prepared by blending castor-oil-based polyurethane prepolymer (COPU) with a filler consisting of high-content clam shell powder (CSP), named CSP-COPU. The structure, microstructure, mechanical properties, and thermal stability of the composites were investigated. The results showed that even at a loading as high as 75 wt.% of the CSP filler, the composite still exhibited good tensile strength and elongation at break. Furthermore, compared with the CSP-COPU composites, TCOS-50 synthesized through blending OH-terminated castor oil-based polyurethane prepolymer (TCOPU) and CSP filler proved that the chemical bond between COPU containing terminal -NCO groups and CSP containing active -OH groups was the key reason to obtaining the composite material with desirable properties. These findings provide prospects for applying biomass-loaded CSP-COPU composites in the packaging industry while contributing to carbon peak achievement and carbon neutrality.

1. Introduction

Current global concerns, including the depletion of oil resources, the effects of global warming, and environmental sustainability [1,2,3], require us to study and utilize renewable energy sources in particular. Consequently, vegetable oils have become one of the ideal raw materials for synthesizing polymers because they are non-toxic, non-hazardous, and renewable [4,5]. Among the many vegetable oils, castor oil (CO) has been employed directly in preparing polyurethane coatings, elastomers, adhesives, foams, and interpenetrating polymer networks [6,7]. CO-based polyurethane networks exhibit attractive flexibility and water resistance properties [8]. For many years, castor oil-based polyurethane and castor-oil-based polyurethane prepolymer (COPU) with good water resistance and flexibility have been prepared by using castor oil and isocyanate [9,10,11,12]. These COPUs have been utilized as compatibilizers [8], flexibility modifiers [11], and adhesives [12] for the preparation of composite materials. For instance, COPU can function as a modifier to improve a material’s flexibility mainly because of its flexible long chains [8,9,10,11,12]. In addition, by adjusting the ratio of reactants (castor oil and isocyanate), CO-based polyurethane prepolymers with reactive groups (-NCO) can be prepared to be used as compatibilizers, which can be further manipulated to form chemical bonds with other polymers to give valuable materials [13].
To this end, CO-based polyurethane materials have been utilized to modify various polymeric materials, such as ethoxylated prepolymer that has been synthesized using isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) [14]. The synthesized prepolymer was further reacted with castor oil to prepare castor oil-based polyurethane as a ligand thickener. What’s more, the phenolic foam was modified with castor oil-based polyurethane prepolymer to improve the material’s flexural strength [15]. In addition, the castor oil-based polyurethane prepolymer was also used as a compatibilizer to obtain a toughened and reinforced thermoplastic starch-based material [8]. Despite these remarkable achievements, castor oil-based polyurethane materials are still unsuitable for structural and high-performance composite applications due to their inherently poor mechanical properties [8,9]. Therefore, this work focuses on using COPU to prepare high-strength composite materials while using biomass raw materials entirely.
Many studies have shown that adding fillers to polymer materials is one of the simplest and most effective methods to obtain reinforced polymer materials. Some of the commonly used fillers include calcium carbonate (CaCO3), barium sulfate (BaSO4), silica, etc. [16,17]. For instance, CaCO3 was reported to effectively improve the storage modulus and thermal decomposition temperature of maleated castor oil-based composites [18]. The challenge in utilizing these fillers is that due to their weak interaction with the matrix, interface incompatibility often occurs in the resulting composite materials [16,17]. Furthermore, the advent of natural fillers and their substitution for conventional mineral or petroleum-based fillers has emerged as an appealing approach, driven by the scarcity of petroleum resources and the context of sustainable development [19,20,21]. Therefore, this work aims to solve the problem of interfacial incompatibility in composites prepared using common inorganic fillers through simple and readily available natural fillers. The interaction between the natural filler and the matrix via chemical bonding is expected to significantly enhance the composite’s interfacial compatibility to afford high-performance composite material.
The presence of seashells provides an eye-catching avenue for this work. As common biomass, shells are eco-friendly and renewable resources that are inexpensive and readily available but were once considered as waste with a substantial environmental threat [22]. Interestingly, shells encompass a minute quantity of polysaccharide protein, which features an organic structure that includes several active groups, such as hydroxyl, amino, etc. [23,24,25]. Furthermore, shells exhibit a layered, brick-and-mortar stacking structure, which endows them with exceptional mechanical properties [26,27]. Additionally, seashells are made up of about 95% CaCO3, which makes an outstanding contribution to the hardness exhibited by the material [22]. Therefore, seashells are ideal natural biofillers to enhance the performance of COPU.
Based on the above background, in this work, we further take full advantage of readily available renewable resources, such as clam shells and castor oil, to investigate the structure and performance of castor oil-based thermosetting composites with high biomass content. We envisaged preparing castor oil-based thermosetting composites with high biomass content by adjusting the content of shell powder fillers and the COPU matrix. We also prove the importance of the active functional groups of COPU in preparing thermoset composites. It is desirable to produce composites with high biomass content and good tensile properties for application in the packaging industry and help to achieve carbon peak as well as carbon neutrality.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Castor oil (CO, Mw = 929 g mol−1) was provided by Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). 4, 4′-Diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) was produced by Sigma Corporation (Shanghai, China). Clam shell powder (CSP) was self-made in the laboratory, referring to previous work [27].

2.2. Synthesis of Castor Oil-Based Polyurethane Prepolymers

According to our previous work [26,27], NCO-terminated castor oil-based polyurethane prepolymer (COPU) was synthesized by MDI and castor oil with a -NCO to -OH molar ratio of 2:1. Then the obtained COPU was taken in a frame plate with a poly tetra fluoroethylene film at 160 °C under the condition of 10 MPa for 4 h to obtain the COPU sheet [11,12].
OH-terminated castor oil-based polyurethane prepolymer (TCOPU) was synthesized with a molar ratio of -NCO to -OH of 1:2, and the synthesis procedure was the same as that of COPU. The IR image of TCOPU is available in Supporting Information Figure S1.

2.3. Preparation of Castor Oil-Enhanced Polyurethane Prepolymer Materials with Different Contents of Clam Shell Powder

Different contents of CSP were directly added to the newly synthesized COPU at 90 °C and stirred for 20 min at 90 °C. It is worth noting that the viscosity of COPU increased significantly after temperature reduction, which is not conducive to the uniform blending of CSP and COPU. The synthesized material was then immediately poured into a hot-pressed frame plate and hot-pressed at 160 °C and 10 MPa for 4 h to obtain thermoset composites. During this process, the mass percentages of CSP added were 25 wt.%, 50 wt.%, and 75 wt.%, and the resulting composites were named COS-25, COS-50, and COS-75, respectively, shown in Figure 1a.
Using the same experimental method, the composite prepared with 50 wt.% TCOPU and 50 wt.% CSP was named TCOS-50 (shown in Figure 1b). The specific formula is shown in Table 1.

2.4. Characterization

The Fourier Transform Infrared (IR) spectrum of the composite samples at the range of 4000~400 cm−1 was recorded using an IR spectrometer (Nicolet6700, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
The fractured surface of the composite at a voltage of 20 kV was observed by a scanning electron microscope (SEM, JSM-5610LV, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
X-ray diffractograms (XRD) of the samples were recorded at 2θ = 10~80° with a scanning rate of 6°/min and cathode at 40 kV and 40 mA through an X-Ray Diffractometer (D8 Advance, Bruker Instruments LTD., Beijing, China).
The fracture strength (σb, MPa), elongation at break (εb, %), and elastic modulus (E, MPa) of the composites were determined with a GP-TS2000S universal testing device (Shenzhen high-quality testing equipment Co., LTD, Shenzhen, China) according to the GB/T1040.3-2006 standard [28].
The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was conducted using a TGA STA449C thermogravimetric analyzer (Neichi Scientific Instrument Trading (Shanghai) Co., LTD. (China Headquarters)), heating from room temperature to 900 °C within a nitrogen atmosphere.
The hydrophilicity of the film surface of the composite was assessed by measuring the water contact angle (CA) with an OCA20 goniometer (DataPhysics, Filderstadt, Germany), employing the static sessile drop technique.

3. Results and Analysis

3.1. Structural Analysis of COS Composites

To further reveal the differences in chemical composition between CSP and CaCO3, their infrared spectra are compared. For the CS sample in Figure 2a, the strong absorption peak at approximately 3400 cm−1 overlaps with the -NH stretching vibration of polysaccharides or proteins (the -NH absorption band at 3260 cm−1), while the peak around 3000 cm−1 is attributed to the stretching vibration of hydroxyl groups (-OH). Additionally, the peak at 1740 cm−1 indicates the stretching vibration of carbonyl groups (C=O). We also observed N-H stretching vibrations at 1240 and 1510 cm−1. In contrast, no absorption peak for -NH was found in the spectrum of pure CaCO3. Figure 2b,c show the IR spectra of COPU and COS-25, COS-50, and COS-75 at 24 h and on the 16th day. From Figure 2b, the characteristic peak induced by the N-H bond stretching vibration in carbamate for COPU, COS-25, and COS-50 samples appeared at 3310 cm−1, while the C=O stretching vibration peak in the ester group occurred around 1720 cm−1 all within 24 h. As mentioned earlier, the results are because the terminal -NCO groups in COPU can interact with -OH and -NH2 groups to form carbamate bonds, etc. Interestingly, the spectra for COPU, COS-25, and COS-50 in Figure 2b show a prominent -NCO peak at about 2267 cm−1 [29,30,31]. However, the -NCO peak decreases gradually as the shell powder content increases. These phenomena indicate that shell powder tends to consume the terminal -NCO group in COPU because the organic components of polysaccharide-protein in shell powder contain active groups (such as -OH, -NH-, etc.), which can react with the -NCO group [31]. This observation is consistent with previous research conclusions [26].
After 16 days, the spectra shown in Figure 2c indicated that the -NCO characteristic peak for all the composite weakened even though there are still relatively prominent peaks for COPU and COS-25. The characteristic absorption peak of the -NCO group for COS-50 could hardly be seen again because the active groups in shell powder could gradually consume the -NCO functional groups in COPU [26]. Meanwhile, COPU could only rely on moisture in the air to slowly consume the terminal -NCO groups. It is important to note that because the shell powder content in COS-25 is relatively small, the consumption rate of -NCO is slower than that of COS-50. As a result, the absorption peak of COS-50 at 2267 cm−1 was significantly weaker than that of COS-25. The infrared spectrogram results show that the shell powder reacts with COPU to consume the -NCO and generate a urethane bond [26,31].
Figure 3 shows the SEM images of the composites at different magnifications (×500, ×3000). It can be seen from the figures that the shell powder mixed well with COPU and was uniformly dispersed in the COPU matrix. At a higher shell powder loading (about 75 wt.%), a small amount of the shell powder agglomerated with a small amount of the COPU continuous phase. By comparing Figure 3(A1,B1,C1) it is evident that with increasing shell powder content, the surface became rough, giving a rough, folded surface (for example the red circle in Figure 3(C1)). This observation was mainly because shell formation is a complex biomineralization process and usually makes the shell powder show a brick-cement structure at the microscopic level [32].
In addition, it can be seen from Figure 3(A2,B2,C2) that there are almost no cracks or gullies between the two phases on the fractured surface of composite materials, indicating that the compatibility between shell powder and COPU is relatively desirable. As already mentioned, the improved compatibility could be attributed to the reaction between the active groups (such as -NH2 or -OH, etc.) in the organic matter of shell powder and the -NCO group of COPU to produce a urethane bond [26], as confirmed by the infrared image. However, the increase in shell powder content makes the fractured surface of the material more uneven.
Figure 4 shows the XRD pattern of the CSP and COPU-based composites. It can be seen from the figure that the shell powder is still in the state of aragonite (PDF#41-1475) [33,34,35] after hot-pressing and curing. The crystallization peak of the composite is highly similar to that of the original shell [26]. As the content of shell powder increases, the peak strength of the material is slightly increased, the trend of XRD of different samples can be observed with the guidance of the arrow, but the crystallization property does not change while the crystallization property of the shell powder is enhanced.

3.2. Analysis of Basic Properties of COS Composites

Table 2 shows the data for the tensile property of COPU, COS-25, COS-50, and COS-75, including tensile strength, elastic modulus, and elongation at break. The pure COPU displayed a tensile strength of 22.9 MPa, elastic modulus of 2036.6MPa, and elongation of 40.3%, indicating that COPU is a ductile material [36]. After adding 25 wt.% of shell powder filler, the tensile strength of COS-25 increased significantly to 32.2 MPa, which is an increase of 40.6%. However, the elastic modulus of COS-25 increased rapidly from 2036.6MPa of pure COPU to 3520.9 MPa, representing an increase of nearly 1.5 GPa. The elastic modulus of COS-25 is about 1.7 times the elastic modulus of COPU, although the elongation reduced significantly to 4.5%. In addition, after adding 50 wt.% of shell powder filler, the tensile strength of COS-50 increased to 35.3 ± 1.2MPa, representing an increase of 54% compared with pure COPU. The elastic modulus of COS-50 increased sharply to 5859.0MPa, representing an increase of nearly 4 GPa and about 2.9 times the elastic modulus of COPU. The results show that COPU transformed from a flexible soft polymer material into a hard high-strength material. However, after adding 75 wt.% of shell powder filler, the tensile strength reduced to 8.1 MPa, while the elastic modulus and the elongation at break reduced to 4160.3 MPa and 11.1%, respectively. The decrease in strength and modulus may be caused by the decomposition of polyglycoproteins in shell powder and the deactivation of the COPU terminal groups during hot-pressing time. All these phenomena indicated that CSP and COPU did not have only physical interactions but chemical interactions to form chemical bonds [26,31,37]. As a result, the COS-50 sample exhibited higher tensile strength and elastic modulus.
In addition, from Figure 1, the blending of TCOPU and CSP to obtain TCOS-50 could not occur under the same blending conditions for the COS-50 composites. The reason for such an observation is that there is no -NCO group in TCOPU to interact chemically with the active groups in CSP, making it difficult to form a thermoset/thermoplastic in the mold let alone be utilized for further applications. The observation further proved that the chemical bond between COPU (-NCO) and CSP (-OH) is the key to obtaining a composite material with desirable properties.
Figure 5 shows the thermal stability of COPU composites measured in a nitrogen atmosphere. As illustrated in Figure 5, the decomposition process of composite materials can be categorized into two distinct stages. The temperature range in the first stage is about 250 °C~550 °C due to the thermal decomposition of the soft segment structures in COPU, which is consistent with the temperature range reported by Wu et al [8]. The weight loss of the composite materials, which represents the second stage of decomposition, has a temperature range of 650~800 °C corresponding to the decomposition of CaCO3 into lime (CaO) [26,31]. The rate of weight loss for COS-25, COS-50, and COS-75 is 11.54%, 21.30%, and 31.50%, respectively.
In terms of the residue for the composites, COPU, COS-25, COS-50, and COS-75 had 7.00%, 15.30%, 28.29%, and 42.40% as the final residues at 900 °C, respectively. The residual amount of COPU was carbon, and the residual amounts of COS composites were CaO and carbon (the specific TG data are shown in Table 3) [8,26,31]. The thermal stability of the composite was not negatively affected by the increase of shell powder content.
In general, the more hydrophilic the material is, the lower the value of its contact angle [38]. Figure 6 shows the water contact angle of COPU, COS-25, COS-50, and COS-75 composites. The contact angle of pure COPU was 102.1°, but after adding 25 wt.% and 50% of shell powder filler, the contact angle of the obtained composites of COS-25 and COS-50 increased, reaching 106.0° and 108.9°, respectively. This means that the hydrophobic property of the samples was further improved, indicating that the organic groups on the surface of the shell powder were effectively consumed. These results confirmed the infrared and mechanical properties and SEM tests. However, when the shell powder content was increased to 75 wt.%, the contact angle of COS-75 dropped to 96.5° because the content of the hydrophilic component far exceeded that of the hydrophobic component. Nevertheless, the composite was still a hydrophobic material. It is worth noting that the consumption of the active groups of the organic matter in shell powder via a chemical reaction with COPU plays a vital role in improving the hydrophobicity of the composite material. Therefore, control of the various proportions of the components in the composite is critical. For instance, better and stronger interface interaction is achieved to improve the hydrophobicity of the materials when the mass fraction ratio of CSP and COPU is 1:1.

3.3. Principle Analysis of COS Composite Materials

Figure 7 shows the schematic diagram of COS-50 composite material. The active surface of shell powder can interact with the castor-oil-based polyurethane prepolymer polymer chain to form a cross-linked structure, further enhancing the composite material. Due to the strong interfacial interaction between the filler particles and the polymer matrix in COS-50, the material can withstand more significant stress and avoid damage. At the same time, the flexible polymer chain combined with shell powder can absorb energy by changing the molecular conformation so that the composite material’s tensile strength and elastic modulus can be improved [39].

4. Conclusions

An eco-friendly renewable shell powder was proposed as a filler material, and the shell powder was also serves as reinforcing agent to endow castor oil-based polyurethane with better tensile properties. Subsequently, a cross-linked castor oil-based polyurethane composite material was successfully prepared by the hot-pressing curing method. To this end, the effects of shell powder content on the interfacial structure and properties of COPU composites were investigated. The overall results showed that as the shell powder content reached 50 wt.%, the tensile strength of COS-50 increased by 1.5 times that of pure COPU, while elastic modulus increased by 2.9 times, close to 6GPa. Thus, COS-50 exhibited excellent interface compatibility, the best tensile properties, and water resistance. In addition, the raw materials of the composite, namely castor oil and shell powder, are renewable biological materials and fall in line with the demand for low carbon material for a sustainable environment. The comprehensive results indicated that the new castor oil-based polyurethane composites with high biomass content have a potential industrial application in structural (support) materials.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym16233232/s1, Figure S1: IR image of TCOPU.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.W.; Data curation, K.J., Q.H. and J.L.; Funding acquisition, F.W.; Investigation, K.J., Y.Y. and P.Z.; Project administration, F.W. and G.Z.; Visualization, E.K.; Writing-original draft, F.W.; Writing—review and editing, P.Z. and E.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by [Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China] grant number [2023AFB152], [Scientific Research Foundation of Hubei University of Education for Talent Introduction] grant number [ESRC20220037], [Hubei Province Housing and Urban-rural Construction Department Science and Technology Plan Project] grant number [(2022)19-63]. And The APC was funded by [Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author because our research group is still conducting further explorations related to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Thakur, S.; Karak, N. Ultratough, Ductile, Castor Oil-Based, Hyperbranched, Polyurethane Nanocomposite Using Functionalized Reduced Graphene Oxide. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 1195–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, L.; Lee, R.E.; Wang, G.; Chu, R.K.M.; Zhao, J.; Park, C.B. Use of stereocomplex crystallites for fully-biobased microcellular low-density poly(lactic acid) foams for green packaging. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 327, 1151–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wan, J.; Gan, C.; Li, J.; Molina-Aldareguia, J.; Kalali, E.N.; Wang, X.; Wang, D.Y. A sustainable, eugenol-derived epoxy resin with high biobased content, modulus, hardness and low flammability: Synthesis, curing kinetics and structure–property relationship. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 284, 1080–1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, C.; Garrison, T.F.; Madbouly, S.A. Recent advances in vegetableoil-based polymers and their composites. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2017, 71, 91–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, P.; Ma, S.Q.; Dai, J.Y. Itaconic acid as a green alternative to acrylic acid for producing a soybean oil-based thermoset: Synthesis and properties. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 1228–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, H.J.; Rong, M.Z.; Zhang, M.Q.; Hu, J.; Chen, H.W.; Czigány, T. Biodegradable foam plastics based on castor oil. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9, 615–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Singh, S.; Sharma, S.; Saoil, J.; Brar, S.K. A comprehensive review of castor oil-derived renewable and sustainable industrial products. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2023, 42, e14008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, Q.X.; Wu, Z.S.; Tian, H.F.; Zhang, Y.; Cai, S.L. Structure and Properties of Tough Thermoplastic Starch Modified with Polyurethane Microparticles. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 9896–9902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhao, T.-H.; Yuan, W.-Q.; Li, Y.-D.; Weng, Y.-X.; Zeng, J.-B. Relating Chemical Structure to Toughness via Morphology Control in Fully Sustainable Sebacic Acid Cured Epoxidized Soybean Oil Toughened Polylactide Blends. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 2027–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Si, W.; Yang, L.; Zhu, J.; Li, Y.; Zeng, J. Highly toughened and heat-resistant poly(L-lactide) materials through interfacial interaction control via chemical structure of biodegradable elastomer. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 483, 1090–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, J.H.; Yuan, W.Q.; Li, Y.D.; Weng, Y.X.; Zeng, J.B. Malleable and Sustainable Poly(ester amide) Networks Synthesized via Melt Condensation Polymerization. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 15147–15153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xia, L.; Cao, D.; Zhang, H. Rheological and Aging Properties of Vegetable Oil-Based Polyurethane (V-PU) Modified Asphalt. Polymers 2023, 15, 2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, Y.; Huang, L.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, P. Tough thermoplastic starch modified with polyurethane microparticles by reactive extrusion. Starch-Stärke 2012, 65, 423–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shi, H.C.; Song, L.Q.; Mao, Z.Q.; Zhang, B.; Yao, W.Q. Preparation and Property of Castor Oil Type Polyurethane Associative Thickener. Polyurethane Ind. 2019, 34, 15–17. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bo, C.Y.; Hu, L.H.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, Y.H. Preparation and Characterization of Phenolic Foams Modified by Castor Oil-based Polyurethane Prepolymer. Chem. Ind. For. Prod. 2015, 35, 8–14. [Google Scholar]
  16. Arias-Monje, P.J.; Bakhtiary Davijani, A.A.; Lu, M.; Ramachandran, J.; Kirmani, M.; Kumar, S. Engineering the Interphase of Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes/Polyacrylonitrile Nanocomposite Fibers with Poly(methyl methacrylate) and Its Effect on Filler Dispersion, Filler-Matrix Interactions, and Tensile Properties. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 4178–4186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mohanty, A.K.; Vivekanandhan, S.; Pin, J.M.; Misra, M. Composites from renewable and sustainable resources: Challenges and innovations. Science 2018, 12, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, H.J.; Rong, T.; Rong, M.Z.; Zhang, M.Q. CaCO3 reinforced maleated castor oil resin and its foam plastics. Acta Mater. Compos. Sin. 2014, 31, 1383–1393. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wu, C.S.; Wu, D.Y.; Wang, S.S. Antibacterial Properties of Bio-based Polyester Composites Achieved Through Modification with Thermally Treated Waste Scallop Shell. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2019, 2, 2262–2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Behazin, E.; Misra, M.; Mohanty, A.K. Sustainable Biocomposites from Pyrolyzed Grass and Toughened Polypropylene: Structure-Property Relationships. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 2191–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fowler, P.A.; Hughes, J.M.; Elias, R.M. Biocomposites: Technology, environmental credentials and market forces. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2006, 86, 1781–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cui, T. Application of shells and preparation of shell materials. J. Fish. Res. 2019, 41, 353–358. [Google Scholar]
  23. Weng, F.Q.; Dou, X.; Deng, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhou, S.; Wu, Q.X.; Zhang, Y. Structure and properties of tough starch modified with rubber-based polyurethane microparticles. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2020, 33, 817–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Suzuki, M.; Saruwatari, K.; Kogure, T.; Yamamoto, Y.; Nishimura, T.; Kato, T.; Nagasawa, H. An acidic matrix protein, Pif, is a key macromolecule for nacre formation. Science 2009, 325, 1388–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kono, M.; Hayashi, N.; Samata, T. Molecular mechanism of the nacreous layer formation in Pinctada maxima. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000, 269, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, P.R.; Weng, F.Q.; Kontang, E.; Wu, Q.X. Effect of special structure of clam shell powder on structure and properties of castor oil-based composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 138, 49963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Weng, F.Q.; Zhang, P.R.; Koranteng, E.; Ma, N.; Wu, Q.X. Effects of the special structure of bio-based shell powder on the properties of shell-polycaprolactone composite. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 48768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. GB/T 1040.3-2006; Plastics—Determination of Tensile Properties-Part 3: Test Conditions for Films and Sheets. National Standard of the People’s Republic of China, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2006.
  29. Patel, R.H.; Mishra, V.K. Effect of increasing NCO ratio on properties of flame retardant di-phosphorous based polyether ester urethanes. Prog. Org. Coat. 2020, 141, 105533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, S.L.; Wu, G.P.; Li, Z.Y.; Lan, Y.J. Green Synthesis of CdSe and Preparation CdSe-Polyurethane Nanocomposites with Luminescence. J. Funct. Polym. 2013, 26, 192–197. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wu, Q.X.; Liu, Y.G.; Jian, K.; Jiang, S.K.; Weng, F.Q.; Wu, C.Y. Constructing a special interface structure of starch/PBAT composites with a novel “many-to-many” strategy. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2024, 252, 110593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, D.H.; Huo, Y.X. Shell Microstructure in Thirteen Species of Bivalves. Chin. J. Zool. 2015, 50, 122–130. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhao, L.P.; Xu, H.Z.; Chen, D.; Bao, L.F.; Fan, M.H.; Liao, Z. Microstructure and spectral analysis of mussel shells with thick shell. J. Zhejiang Univ. (Sci. Ed.) 2015, 42, 339–346. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hao, H.Q.; Zhang, C.F.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Hao, S.J.; Ma, X.Z. Research on active degree and microstructure of calcined shells. J. Wuhan Univ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 39, 434–438. [Google Scholar]
  35. Song, Y.F.; Lu, Y.; Ding, H.B. Structural characteristics at the adductor muscle and shell interface in mussel. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013, 171, 1203–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chen, J.-H.; Hu, D.-D.; Li, Y.-D.; Meng, F.; Zhu, J.; Zeng, J.-B. Castor oil derived poly(urethane urea) networks with reprocessibility and enhanced mechanical properties. Polymer 2018, 143, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, Y.; Fu, J.; Dang, B.; Sun, Q.; Li, H.; Zhai, T. Artificial Wooden Nacre: A High Specific Strength Engineering Material. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 2036–2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, Y.D.; Zeng, J.B.; Wang, X.L.; Yang, K.K.; Wang, Y.Z. Structure and Properties of Soy Protein/Poly(butylene succinate) Blends with Improved Compatibility. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9, 3157–3164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ge, L.Q. Functionalization of Shell Waste and Its Application in Adsorbents and Polymer Composites. Ph.D. Thesis, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Composite samples of COPU, COS-25,.COS-50, COS-75; (b) Composite samples of TCOS-50.
Figure 1. (a) Composite samples of COPU, COS-25,.COS-50, COS-75; (b) Composite samples of TCOS-50.
Polymers 16 03232 g001
Figure 2. (a) IR image of clam shell powder; IR image of COS composite material (b) placed for 24 h and (c) placed for 16 days.
Figure 2. (a) IR image of clam shell powder; IR image of COS composite material (b) placed for 24 h and (c) placed for 16 days.
Polymers 16 03232 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of (A1) COS-25 (×500), (A2) COS-25 (×3000), (B1) COS-50 (×500), (B2) (×3000), and (C1) COS-75 (×500), (C2) COS-75 (×3000).
Figure 3. SEM images of (A1) COS-25 (×500), (A2) COS-25 (×3000), (B1) COS-50 (×500), (B2) (×3000), and (C1) COS-75 (×500), (C2) COS-75 (×3000).
Polymers 16 03232 g003
Figure 4. XRD pattern of (a) CSP and (b) COPU and composites.
Figure 4. XRD pattern of (a) CSP and (b) COPU and composites.
Polymers 16 03232 g004
Figure 5. TG diagram of COPU and COS composites.
Figure 5. TG diagram of COPU and COS composites.
Polymers 16 03232 g005
Figure 6. Contact angle diagram of COS composites.
Figure 6. Contact angle diagram of COS composites.
Polymers 16 03232 g006
Figure 7. Interface structure of COS-50 composite material.
Figure 7. Interface structure of COS-50 composite material.
Polymers 16 03232 g007
Table 1. The formulas and the sample names of the composites.
Table 1. The formulas and the sample names of the composites.
Sample NamesCOPU (wt.%)CSP (wt.%)TCOPU (wt.%)
COPU1000-
COS-257525-
COS-505050-
COS-752575-
TCOS-50-5050
Table 2. Tensile properties of the composites.
Table 2. Tensile properties of the composites.
SampleTensile Strength
δb (MPa)
Elastic Modulus
E (MPa)
Elongation at Break εb (%)
COPU22.9 ± 1.42036.6 ± 196.940.3 ± 7.0
COS-2532.2 ± 0.73520.9 ± 146.24.5 ± 0.9
COS-5035.3 ± 1.25880.7 ± 147.84.0 ± 0.6
COS-758.1 ± 0.14160.3 ± 31.311.1 ± 0.9
Table 3. Weightlessness and ash ratio at 900 °C for the two main stages of different composites.
Table 3. Weightlessness and ash ratio at 900 °C for the two main stages of different composites.
SampleWeight Loss During 250~550 °C (%)Weight Loss During 650~800 °C (%)Ashes at 900 °C (%)
COPU9.540.0337.00
COS-2571.7911.5415.30
COS-5048.0621.3028.29
COS-7523.8731.5042.40
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Weng, F.; Jian, K.; Yi, Y.; Zhang, P.; Koranteng, E.; Huang, Q.; Liu, J.; Zeng, G. Eco-Friendly Castor Oil-Based Composite with High Clam Shell Powder Content. Polymers 2024, 16, 3232. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16233232

AMA Style

Weng F, Jian K, Yi Y, Zhang P, Koranteng E, Huang Q, Liu J, Zeng G. Eco-Friendly Castor Oil-Based Composite with High Clam Shell Powder Content. Polymers. 2024; 16(23):3232. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16233232

Chicago/Turabian Style

Weng, Fangqing, Kui Jian, Yazhou Yi, Peirui Zhang, Ernest Koranteng, Qing Huang, Jiahui Liu, and Guoping Zeng. 2024. "Eco-Friendly Castor Oil-Based Composite with High Clam Shell Powder Content" Polymers 16, no. 23: 3232. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16233232

APA Style

Weng, F., Jian, K., Yi, Y., Zhang, P., Koranteng, E., Huang, Q., Liu, J., & Zeng, G. (2024). Eco-Friendly Castor Oil-Based Composite with High Clam Shell Powder Content. Polymers, 16(23), 3232. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16233232

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop