Next Article in Journal
Ultraviolet Irradiation Surface Treatment to Enhance the Bonding Strength of Polyamide-Based Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic Polymers
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanical and Thermal Degradation-Related Performance of Recycled LDPE from Post-Consumer Waste
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chitin Extracted from Black Soldier Fly Larvae at Different Growth Stages

1
Dipartimento per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile e la Transizione Ecologica, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Piazza S. Eusebio 5, 13100 Vercelli, Italy
2
Dipartimento di Scienze e Innovazione Tecnologica, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Viale Teresa Michel 11, 15121 Alessandria, Italy
3
Myia SA, Via Industria 12, CH-6710, 6710 Biasca, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2024, 16(20), 2861; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16202861
Submission received: 4 September 2024 / Revised: 3 October 2024 / Accepted: 7 October 2024 / Published: 10 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Polysaccharides: Chitosan, Chitin, Pectin and Gums)

Abstract

:
The black soldier fly (BSF) Hermetia Illucens can grow rapidly and on a wide variety of organic materials, and it is extensively used as a means of disposing of household organic waste. Different phases of the life cycle of BSF larvae (BSFL) are used in this work to extract chitin after the removal of lipids, mineral salts, and proteins. Multiple techniques, such as X-ray diffractometry, infrared spectroscopy, solid-state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (13C ss-NMR) and thermogravimetric analysis, are used to investigate the chemical and physical characteristics of the extracted samples of chitin, which shows a high degree of acetylation (from 78% to 94%). The extracted chitin shows an increase of the thermal stability of 20 °C in the initial stage of life and 35 °C at the end of the life cycle if compared with a commercial standard. Moreover, the extracted chitin shows an increase in the crystallinity degree during the BSFL growth time (from 72% to 78%).

1. Introduction

Insect farms are one of the most emerging and sustainable industrial activities, and during the last years, several insect species have been bred to produce animal feed and fertilizers for agricultural use or for processing organic waste [1]. The use of different insect species changes the ended products: among these, organic waste processing Black Soldier Fly Larvae (BSFL), a promising technology with high waste reduction potential, leads to marketable high-value products [1,2,3,4].
BSFL are originally native to the Americas and widespread in tropical and temperate regions of the world; the species shows a short life cycle of 41 to 131 days, depending on the nutrient and energy composition of the feeding substrates and the ambient temperature of the rearing environment [5,6]. The short life cycle and fast growth potential of BSFL make this species interesting for farming conditions: depending on the moisture content of the substrate, BSFL can consume daily 2 to 6.5 times their body mass in feed [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14].
Among the products that can be obtained by BSFL processing, resources for livestock feed can be mentioned. The Dry Matter (DM) content of fresh BSFL is high (34.9% to 44.9%), and this makes BSFL less expensive than other fresh products. On average, BSFL consist of 41 to 44% crude protein (CP), 15 to 35% ethereal extract (EE), 7 to 10% crude fibers (CF), 15 to 28% ash and about 5.250 kcal/kg of gross energy (GE), based on DM [8]. Moreover, BSFL are high in Ca (5 to 8%) and P (0.6 to 1.5%) [8].
The fraction of protein, lipids and mineral salts depends on various environmental factors during the growth of the larvae, ranging from the conditions under which BSFL are reared to the processing methods they undergo for transformation into final products [9,15,16,17]. BSFL have been also used as a source of new antibiotic preparations for livestock, as well as a source of chitin and its derivative chitosan [12,13]. Recently, their use in the generation of energy in the form of biogas through the anaerobic digestion of frass has also been explored [11].
Chitin has a cellulose structure (Figure 1) in which the hydroxyl group at the carbon atom in position 2 is replaced by an acetamide group. It is one of the most widely occurring biopolymers in nature, only second to cellulose, and consists of N-acetyl-2-amino-2-deoxy-D-glucopyranose and 2-amino-2-deoxy-D-glucose in pyranose form, which are linked together by 1–4 glycosidic bonds with a degree of acetylation (DA%) greater than 60 percent [18,19,20].
It is naturally present in the exoskeletons of various animals, fungi, and microorganisms. Currently, the main source from which chitin is extracted is seafood industry waste, particularly from the exoskeletons of crabs and shrimps [2,18,21,22].
Chitin is widely used in various fields, such as in biomedical applications due to its biocompatibility and ability to reabsorb into tissues, in pharmacology as a carrier, in agriculture and water treatment as an adsorbent or flocculant, and in the textile and food industries as a stabilizer. The application of chitin in these different fields is due to its properties as an adsorbent and antimicrobial [2,18,19,23,24,25,26]. Chitin and chitosan-derived composites offer biocompatibility, excellent barrier and mechanical properties, and are cost-effective compared to synthetic materials. In food packaging, they act as a carrier for antioxidants and antimicrobial agents, enhancing food preservation and extending shelf life, making them ideal for sustainable packaging solutions [27]. Besides insects, fungi and microorganisms also contain chitin, though in a much lower percentage than in the exoskeletons of arthropods [28].
Extracting chitin from insects has several advantages because they (i) are not subject to seasonality as in the case of fisheries, (ii) can survive in suboptimal conditions, and (iii) require less space and water than other sources. In addition, insects have a shorter life cycle when compared to other sources [2,3].
Chitosan is also present in nature, though in a form with a lower degree of acetylation (<60%). Figure 1 shows a schematic representation of chitin and chitosan.
As a natural biopolymer, chitin is found in three allomorphic forms and with varying degrees of acetylation: (i) α-chitin is the most abundant form in the exoskeleton of crustaceans, and this type of chitin chain has an antiparallel structure; (ii) β-chitin extracted from squid pens is characterized by the parallel chitin chain structure and (iii) γ-chitin, the less abundant form, is found in yeast and fungi as a combination of α-chitin and β-chitin. Crustaceans, fungi, and insects have different allomorphic forms of chitin with varying degrees of acetylation [2,19,21,22].
The process of isolating chitin from BSFL was optimized in this work in terms of temperature, time and the concentration of reagent. The extracted chitin was compared with a commercial one and the difference in terms of the acetylation degree and crystallinity were studied. The chitin obtained from BSFL shows a high degree of acetylation (DA%) (some set samples at more than 90%) if compared with the highest chitin extract obtained from insects reported in the literature.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The materials from which chitin was extracted were samples from different BSFL stages. The sets of samples were collected at 10 days, in the initial phase of BSFL life (sample named BSFL-IL), and 25 days, in the end phase of BSFL life (sample named BSFL-EL) after hatching, respectively. All samples used were derived from a Myia SA (Biasca, Switzerland) pilot plant in which both colony reproduction for egg production and larval fattening on organic substrates for the final production of feed materials were carried out. The larvae used in the experiment were grown on UFA 524 IPS chicken starter feed prepared at a 75% moisture content. The inoculum of 5-DOL (Days Of Larvae) was calculated at the rate of 1.5 g feed/5-DOL.
The chitin extracted from each sample was compared with a commercial sample of chitin (TCI chemicals (Tokyo, Japan), CAS number 1398-61-4).

2.2. Chitin Extraction and Purification

Black Soldier Fly Larvae samples were dried at 50 °C overnight to remove the water contained within the samples. After the removal of water from 1 g of sample, the first process step was carried out for the extraction of lipids with 50 mL of dichloroethane (Sigma-Aldrich (St. Luois, MO, USA), CAS number 107-06-2), and the sample was stirred for 24 h. This process is needed because lipids can interfere with the subsequent steps. The materials were treated with 1 M HCl (Sigma-Aldrich (St. Luois, MO, USA), CAS number 7647-01-0), with a sample to solution ratio of 1:50, and heated at 95 °C for one hour. This step provides the solubilization of the carbonate salts contained in the materials [29]. After one hour, the samples were filtered and washed with deionized water to obtain a neutral pH and then dried at 50 °C up to constant weight. Subsequently, the demineralized samples were placed in contact with 1 M NaOH (Sigma-Aldrich (St. Luois, MO, USA), CAS number 1310-73-2), with a sample to solution ratio of 1:50. The suspensions were heated at boiling point for 24 h. This step was conducted with the aim of solubilizing the protein fraction and leaving the chitin present unaltered [29]. After 24 h, the materials were separated from the solution by filtration and washed with deionized water to a neutral pH, after which the samples were dried at 50 °C up to constant weight. The percentages of removed substances, for each step, are reported in Table 1, which shows the composition of two sets of BSFL samples (BSFL-IL and BSFL-EL).

2.3. Characterization Techniques

X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) patterns were obtained using a AXS D8 ADVANCE diffractometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) in reflection mode with Bragg–Brentano geometry, using an interval of 5–40° (2 θ), operating with a radiation source of monochromatic X-rays at Cu Kα (λ = 1.5406 Å), using a LYNXEYE_XE_T detector, and applying 40 kV and 40 mA as the voltage and amperage, respectively.
Attenuated Total Reflectance infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) analyses were carried out by using an IR Nicolet 5700 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) spectrometer with 64 scans and a resolution of 4 cm−1 in a 4000–400 cm−1 spectral range. Solid-state NMR spectra were collected using a Bruker Avance III 500 spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) and a wide-bore 11.75 Tesla magnet, with operational frequencies of 125.77 MHz for C. In all experiments, a 4 mm triple resonance probe, operating in double resonance mode with magic angle spinning (MAS), was utilized. Samples were loaded into a 4 mm ZrO2 rotor and spun at a MAS rate of 10–15 kHz. For the 13C cross-polarization (CP) MAS experiments, initial excitation and decoupling were achieved using proton radio frequencies (RF) of 55 and 28 kHz, respectively. Throughout the CP period, the 1H RF field underwent ramping in 100 increments, while the 13C RF field remained constant. Protons were decoupled from carbon during acquisition using a Spinal-64 decoupling scheme. A cross-polarization contact time of 2 ms and a delay between scans of 1 to 5 s were employed [30]. Spin locking utilized a moderate ramped RF field of 55 kHz, and the carbon RF field was adjusted for optimal signal (40 kHz). Spectra were recorded with a spectral width of 42 kHz, and transients between 5 k and 40 k were accumulated at 298 K. Chemical shifts are reported using the δ scale and externally referenced to TMS at 0 ppm.
Thermogravimetry analyses (TGA) were performed on a Setaram (Caluire, France) LABSYS evo (TGA, DTA/DSC) under N2 (gas flow rate 40 mL/min), heating around 10 mg of samples from 30 to 700 °C at a rate of 5 °C/min [31].

3. Results

Chitin was extracted by adapting methods used for the extraction of chitin and chitosan from crab and shrimp exoskeletons [2,3,21,27,28]. Several methods for the extraction of chitin from insects are described in the literature, with each process differentiated by the time, acid or base concentration, operating temperature, and order of demineralization and deproteinization process [32,33,34,35,36]. Chitin can be extract from different sources with chemical, biological, or enzymatic processes [22,36,37,38]. In this work, a chemical extraction process was used for chitin extraction from BSFL.
After removing lipids, mineral salts, and proteins, all samples were analyzed using different techniques to determine the composition of the obtained materials (Table 1). Each step was repeated five times on different batches with the aim of obtaining an average value.

3.1. Characterisation

Infrared spectroscopy was used to characterize the untreated materials, as well as those after each processing stage. The extracted chitin samples were subjected to infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, X-ray diffractometry and 13C CPMAS NMR. On the extracted chitin samples, infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, X-ray diffractometry and 13C CPMASNMR analyses were carried out. Such extended characterization aimed to determine the differences in the materials after the process of protein extraction. The chitin samples obtained from the BSFL samples at different growing times were extracted using the methods described in this work and compared to a commercial chitin.

3.2. X-ray Diffraction

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of chitin samples is widely used, as it enables the determination of the degree of crystallinity [19,20,28,39].
The XRD profiles of BSFL-IL and BSFL-EL, in Figure 2 a and b, respectively, show the characteristic diffraction peaks of chitin, though some of them, ranging between 25 and 30 2θ, could not be identified due to the presence of residual impurities of mineral salts and proteins. The chitin extracted from the BSFL, both at the start and end of the life cycle, shows the same XRD profile as the commercial chitin. The presence of impurities or residual protein causes the widening of reflexes and a small shift in the peaks’ position. Previous research was used to assign the reflection planes in the diffractograms [19,39,40].
No significant differences in the position of the reflection peaks were detected; the intensity of the peaks was used to determine the Cristal Index of the extracted chitin samples and the commercial one.
From the diffractograms, the Crystal Index (CrI%) was calculated using Equation (1) [41]:
C r I % = I 020 I a m I 020 · 100
where I020 is the intensity of the peak attributed to the 020 plane (2θ ≈ 9°) and Iam is the intensity of the amorphous contribution present in the diffractogram at 2θ ≈ 16° [42]. Table 2 shows the CrI% (average of five replications) of the extracted chitin samples.

3.3. FT-IR Spectroscopy

Attenuated total reflectance infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) was used to characterize all the chitin samples extracted from BSFL samples at different growing stages and compare them to a commercial chitin. Thid comparison with a commercial chitin was performed to determine the presence of residual impurities within the material (Figure 3). ATR-FTIR was also used to determine the changes undergone by the samples during each process step; the spectra are reported in the Supplementary Materials for the sake of brevity.
The high-frequency region (4000–3000 cm−1) displays bands at (i) 3478 and 3437 cm−1 due to two families of hydroxyl groups engaged in intramolecular hydrogen bonds; (ii) at 3261 cm−1 due to the stretching of the NH groups of the chitin chains in the form of hydrogen-bonded amide groups; and (iii) at 3102 cm−1 due to an overtone of vibrations of amide II at 1560 and 1620 cm−1 [43].
In the frequency range between 3000 and 2800 cm−1, there are five different bands associated with the symmetrical and asymmetrical stretching of the CH3, CH2 and CH groups that make up the β-D-glucose units. The bands at 2961 and 2875 cm−1 are due to the asymmetrical and symmetrical stretching of the CH3 groups, respectively, whereas the corresponding vibrations of the CH2 groups are found at 2925 and 2855 cm−1; the latter bands are more intense in the spectrum of the BSFL-IL, which is possible because of the presence of lipids not completely removed during the purification stage (see below the ss-NMR data). The band at 2889 cm−1 is assigned to the stretching of the CH groups.
In the low-frequency region (1750–400 cm−1), the chitin vibrations are present as follows: (i) the NH and CO vibrational modes of the amide groups are between 1660 and 1500 cm−1; and (ii) at wavenumbers lower than 1500 cm−1, the bands of the CH3 and CH2 deformation modes are present, along with skeletal collective vibrations. Table 3 displays the band positions of the chitin extracted from BSF-IL and BSFL-EL, and commercial chitin and the values reported in the literature.

3.4. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

Nuclear magnetic resonance is a very common technique used for the characterization of chitin. 1H, 13C, 15N and 31P NMR data can provide important information such as the acetylation degree, purity, and allomorphic form [41,42,43].
The 13C CPMAS NMR spectra of the extracted chitin, along with the spectrum of the commercial sample reported for comparison, are shown in Figure 4.
There are no relevant differences between the chitin sample extracted from BSFL at the start or at the end of their life cycle. Both samples show additional peaks in the 27–34 ppm range due to the methylene carbons of residual lipids [46].
For the completeness of the data, the 13C CPMAS NMR spectrum of a commercial chitosan, along with the 1H MAS NMR spectra of extracted chitin samples and commercial chitin, are provided in the Supplementary Materials.
The degree of acetylation (DA%) could be determined using Equation (2) [47,48]:
D A % = I C H 3 I C 1 + I C 2 + I C 3 + I C 4 + I C 5 + I C 6 6 × 100
where ICH3 is the intensity of the peak of the methyl group and ICn is the intensity of the peaks due to the six different carbons of the monomeric unit ring. The intensity of the 13C CPMAS NMR peaks and the DA% are reported in Table 4.
Both the chitin samples extracted from BSFL and the commercial chitin show a high DA%, reaching a remarkable value of 94% in the case of the samples extracted from BSFL at the end of their life cycle.
Our results suggest that the DA% for chitin samples depends on the chitin source and the method used for the extraction [49].

3.5. Thermogravimetric Analysis

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was used to determine the thermal stability of the extracted materials compared with that of a commercial chitin (Figure 5).
Thermogravimetric analyses and the derivative curves (DTG) show the presence of three different degradations in the 30–150, 200–400, and 400–700 °C range, respectively. For all samples, the first weight loss at 30–150 °C is due to the loss of adsorbed water [25,28,50].
The second weight loss at 200–400 °C is due to the thermal degradation of the chitin chains in the samples: deacetylation, dehydration, the loss of amino groups and the cross-linking reactions of chitin chains take place in this temperature range [50,51,52].
The last weight loss at 400–700 °C is due to the depolymerization and degradation of chitin to form volatile molecules with a low molecular weight and char [50,53].
The commercial samples show an additional weight loss at 250 °C of unknown nature. The weight loss % in each temperature range is reported in Table 5.
Both chitin samples extracted from BSFL have a higher degradation temperature, at 365 and 380 °C for BSFL-IL and BSFL-EL, respectively, than the commercial chitin degrading at 345 °C.

4. Discussion

Chitin is used for countless applications, such as medical, agricultural, and environmental applications, and in the food and textile industry. It is currently extracted from various animal and plant sources, mainly crab and shrimp shells. However, these natural sources are dependent on seasonality, with moderately long growth times and specific conditions, and all these sources have a high environmental impact. Over the past few years, BSFL have attracted a great deal of attention as a renewable source for various applications, such as the production of biodiesel fuel, animal feeds, and cosmetics [1,11]. BSFL can grow rapidly and on a wide variety of organic materials, and they are extensively used as a means of disposing of household organic waste [1]. The extraction of chitin from BSFL at different stages of life was optimized in this work and the samples obtained were compared to a commercial chitin extracted from arthropod exoskeletons [22,29].
The XRD profiles show the characteristic diffraction peaks of chitin extracted from other animal sources; however, extra phases due to residues from the various process steps are also present. The crystallinity (CrI%) of the chitin extracted from BSFL at the initial life stage and the commercial sample is similar, whereas the chitin extracted from BSFL at the end-of-life stage shows a higher CrI% (at about 78%).
Infrared spectroscopy does not allow the chitin extracted from BSFL samples to be differentiated from that of commercial origin. However, some lipidic impurities are detected in the chitin extracted from BSFL samples, especially at the initial stage of life. This result was confirmed by the NMR spectra, where the signals of methyl and methylene carbons at 27–34 ppm were more intense for the chitin extracted from the BSFL-IL sample (Figure 4, curve a). Moreover, the 13C CPMAS NMR spectra show that the DA% increases during the BSFL life cycle, reaching a remarkable value of 94% at the end of the BSFL’s life.
The different CrI%, DA%, and thermal stability of the samples produced in this work suggest that chitin biopolymers with an increased molecular weight and tighter chain packing can be produced depending on the BSFL’s stage of life [19,25,28,53].

5. Conclusions

Two different chitin samples were successfully extracted from BSFL at different stages of the life cycle (10 and 20 days after hatching). This work used three process steps to extract substantially purified chitin, namely, the removal of lipids, mineral salts, and protein from BSFL. X-ray diffraction analysis showed that the crystal index (CrI%) of the extracted chitin increases from 71% to 78% during the life of BSFL. A remarkable DA% of 94%, one of the highest reported in the literature, was detected by the 13C CPMAS NMR spectra for the extracted sample at the end of the BSFL life cycle (BSFL-EL). This sample also displays the highest thermal stability (380 °C) if compared with the BSFL at their initial stage of life (365 °C) and the commercial sample (345 °C). Moreover, with this method, the yield % of the extracted chitin for BSFL-IL and BSFL-EL was, respectively, 19% and 24%. In the literature, the yield % for chitin extracted from insects is between 5% to 15% (from 18% to 60% for crustaceans) [54].
All these results suggest that chitin with an increased molecular weight and tighter chain packing can be produced by increasing the BSFL life cycle. This enhanced chitin can offer superior mechanical and barrier properties owing to its greater crystallinity, making it ideal for use in food packaging, contributing to better food preservation and the extension of shelf-life. Furthermore, all the data collected suggest that it is possible to obtain chitin with different application-specific properties from BSFL by modulating the days of larval growth.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym16202861/s1. Figure S1: FTIR spectra of raw sample (a), after the lipid removal step (b), after the demineralization step (c), and the chitin extracted (d) from BSFL-IL samples; Figure S2: FTIR spectra of raw sample (a), after the lipid removal step (b), after the mineral salts removal step (c), and the chitin extracted (d) from BSFL-EL samples; Figure S3: XRPD profiles of extracted chitin from BSFL-IL (a), BSFL-EL (b) and commercial standard (c); Figure S4: 13C CPMAS NMR spectra of chitosan standard; Figure S5: 1H MAS NMR spectra of chitin extracted samples in the initial stage of life (a), in the end stage of life (b), and in chitin standard (c).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M., R.Z. and G.G.; formal analysis, A.M. and G.P.; investigation, A.M. and G.P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M., L.M. and G.G.; writing—review and editing, A.M., G.P., R.Z., L.M. and G.G.; supervision, L.M. and G.G.; project administration, G.G.; funding acquisition, G.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Italian Minister of University and Research and International Cooperation Program EUROSTARS 3-Call 2022 CoD03 and the project: AIWTUC “An innovative way to use Chitin: from Organic Waste to functional fabrics”. A. Marangon holds a PhD career grant supported by Next Generation EU–MUR.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Riccardo Zaghi was employed by the company Myia SA. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Poveda, J. Insect Frass in the Development of Sustainable Agriculture. A Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 41, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hahn, T.; Tafi, E.; Paul, A.; Salvia, R.; Falabella, P.; Zibek, S. Current State of Chitin Purification and Chitosan Production from Insects. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2020, 95, 2775–2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zainol Abidin, N.A.; Kormin, F.; Zainol Abidin, N.A.; Mohamed Anuar, N.A.F.; Abu Bakar, M.F. The Potential of Insects as Alternative Sources of Chitin: An Overview on the Chemical Method of Extraction from Various Sources. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Subnational Climate Fund–Global Study on Black Soldier Fly Sector. 2022. Available online: https://www.subnational.finance/projet/black-soldier-fly-market-study/ (accessed on 3 September 2024).
  5. Wang, Y.-S.; Shelomi, M. Review of Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) as Animal Feed and Human Food. Foods 2017, 6, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chia, S.Y.; Tanga, C.M.; Khamis, F.M.; Mohamed, S.A.; Salifu, D.; Sevgan, S.; Fiaboe, K.K.M.; Niassy, S.; Van Loon, J.J.A.; Dicke, M.; et al. Threshold Temperatures and Thermal Requirements of Black Soldier Fly Hermetia illucens: Implications for Mass Production. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0206097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Seyedalmoosavi, M.M.; Mielenz, M.; Veldkamp, T.; Daş, G.; Metges, C.C. Growth Efficiency, Intestinal Biology, and Nutrient Utilization and Requirements of Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) Larvae Compared to Monogastric Livestock Species: A Review. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2022, 13, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shah, A.A.; Totakul, P.; Matra, M.; Cherdthong, A.; Harnboonsong, Y.; Wanapat, M. Nutritional Composition of Various Insects and Potential Uses as Alternative Protein Sources in Animal Diets. Anim. Biosci. 2022, 35, 317–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Barragan-Fonseca, K.B.; Dicke, M.; Van Loon, J.J.A. Nutritional Value of the Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens L.) and Its Suitability as Animal Feed—A Review. J. Insects Food Feed. 2017, 3, 105–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Müller, A.; Wolf, D.; Gutzeit, H.O. The Black Soldier Fly, Hermetia Illucens—A Promising Source for Sustainable Production of Proteins, Lipids and Bioactive Substances. Z. Naturforschung C 2017, 72, 351–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bulak, P.; Proc, K.; Pawłowska, M.; Kasprzycka, A.; Berus, W.; Bieganowski, A. Biogas Generation from Insects Breeding Post Production Wastes. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 244, 118777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Moretta, A.; Salvia, R.; Scieuzo, C.; Di Somma, A.; Vogel, H.; Pucci, P.; Sgambato, A.; Wolff, M.; Falabella, P. A Bioinformatic Study of Antimicrobial Peptides Identified in the Black Soldier Fly (BSF) Hermetia Illucens (Diptera: Stratiomyidae). Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hillyer, J.F. Insect Immunology and Hematopoiesis. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2016, 58, 102–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shishkov, O.; Hu, M.; Johnson, C.; Hu, D.L. Black Soldier Fly Larvae Feed by Forming a Fountain around Food. J. R. Soc. Interface 2019, 16, 20180735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Eggink, K.M.; Dalsgaard, J. Chitin Contents in Different Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) Life Stages. J. Insects Food Feed. 2023, 9, 855–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Soetemans, L.; Uyttebroek, M.; Bastiaens, L. Characteristics of Chitin Extracted from Black Soldier Fly in Different Life Stages. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 165, 3206–3214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pedrazzani, C.; Righi, L.; Vescovi, F.; Maistrello, L.; Caligiani, A. Black Soldier Fly as a New Chitin Source: Extraction, Purification and Molecular/Structural Characterization. LWT 2024, 191, 115618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Elieh-Ali-Komi, D.; Hamblin, M.R. Chitin and Chitosan: Production and Application of Versatile Biomedical Nanomaterials. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2016, 4, 411–427. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kumirska, J.; Czerwicka, M.; Kaczyński, Z.; Bychowska, A.; Brzozowski, K.; Thöming, J.; Stepnowski, P. Application of Spectroscopic Methods for Structural Analysis of Chitin and Chitosan. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 1567–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Triunfo, M.; Tafi, E.; Guarnieri, A.; Salvia, R.; Scieuzo, C.; Hahn, T.; Zibek, S.; Gagliardini, A.; Panariello, L.; Coltelli, M.B.; et al. Characterization of Chitin and Chitosan Derived from Hermetia Illucens, a Further Step in a Circular Economy Process. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 6613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rinaudo, M. Chitin and Chitosan: Properties and Applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2006, 31, 603–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chakravarty, J.; Edwards, T.A. Innovation from Waste with Biomass-Derived Chitin and Chitosan as Green and Sustainable Polymer: A Review. Energy Nexus 2022, 8, 100149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hahn, T.; Roth, A.; Ji, R.; Schmitt, E.; Zibek, S. Chitosan Production with Larval Exoskeletons Derived from the Insect Protein Production. J. Biotechnol. 2020, 310, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Negrea, P.; Caunii, A.; Sarac, I.; Butnariu, M. The Study of Infrared Spectrum of Chitin and Chitosan Extract as Potential Sources of Biomass. Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostruct. (DJNB) 2015, 10, 1129–1138. [Google Scholar]
  25. Villar-Chavero, M.M.; Domínguez, J.C.; Alonso, M.V.; Oliet, M.; Rodriguez, F. Thermal and Kinetics of the Degradation of Chitosan with Different Deacetylation Degrees under Oxidizing Atmosphere. Thermochim. Acta 2018, 670, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pokhrel, S.; Yadav, P.N.; Adhikari, R. Applications of Chitin and Chitosan in Industry and Medical Science: A Review. Nepal J. Sci. Technol. 2016, 16, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mulla, M.F.Z.; Ahmed, J.; Vahora, A.; Pathania, S.; Rashed, M.S. Characterization of Biopolymers Based Antibacterial Films Enriched with Thyme Essential Oil and Their Application for Milk Cake Preservation. Front. Food. Sci. Technol. 2024, 4, 1356582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Waśko, A.; Bulak, P.; Polak-Berecka, M.; Nowak, K.; Polakowski, C.; Bieganowski, A. The First Report of the Physicochemical Structure of Chitin Isolated from Hermetia illucens. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 92, 316–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ravi, H.K.; Degrou, A.; Costil, J.; Trespeuch, C.; Chemat, F.; Vian, M.A. Effect of Devitalization Techniques on the Lipid, Protein, Antioxidant, and Chitin Fractions of Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) Larvae. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2020, 246, 2549–2568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Paul, G.; Steuernagel, S.; Koller, H. Non-Covalent Interactions of a Drug Molecule Encapsulated in a Hybrid Silica Gel. Chem. Commun. 2007, 5194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gullo, F.; Marangon, A.; Croce, A.; Gatti, G.; Aceto, M. From Natural Woods to High Density Materials: An Ecofriendly Approach. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mohan, K.; Ganesan, A.R.; Ezhilarasi, P.N.; Kondamareddy, K.K.; Rajan, D.K.; Sathishkumar, P.; Rajarajeswaran, J.; Conterno, L. Green and Eco-Friendly Approaches for the Extraction of Chitin and Chitosan: A Review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 287, 119349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Brigode, C.; Hobbi, P.; Jafari, H.; Verwilghen, F.; Baeten, E.; Shavandi, A. Isolation and Physicochemical Properties of Chitin Polymer from Insect Farm Side Stream as a New Source of Renewable Biopolymer. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 275, 122924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mohan, K.; Ganesan, A.R.; Muralisankar, T.; Jayakumar, R.; Sathishkumar, P.; Uthayakumar, V.; Chandirasekar, R.; Revathi, N. Recent Insights into the Extraction, Characterization, and Bioactivities of Chitin and Chitosan from Insects. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 105, 17–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mohammed, M.H.; Williams, P.A.; Tverezovskaya, O. Extraction of Chitin from Prawn Shells and Conversion to Low Molecular Mass Chitosan. Food Hydrocoll. 2013, 31, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ibitoye, E.B.; Lokman, I.H.; Hezmee, M.N.M.; Goh, Y.M.; Zuki, A.B.Z.; Jimoh, A.A. Extraction and Physicochemical Characterization of Chitin and Chitosan Isolated from House Cricket. Biomed. Mater. 2018, 13, 025009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hoell, I.A.; Vaaje-Kolstad, G.; Eijsink, V.G.H. Structure and Function of Enzymes Acting on Chitin and Chitosan. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 2010, 27, 331–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hossin, M.A.; Al Shaqsi, N.H.K.; Al Touby, S.S.J.; Al Sibani, M.A. A Review of Polymeric Chitin Extraction, Characterization, and Applications. Arab. J. Geosci. 2021, 14, 1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Stawski, D.; Rabiej, S.; Herczyńska, L.; Draczyński, Z. Thermogravimetric Analysis of Chitins of Different Origin. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2008, 93, 489–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, Y.; Xue, C.; Xue, Y.; Gao, R.; Zhang, X. Determination of the Degree of Deacetylation of Chitin and Chitosan by X-ray Powder Diffraction. Carbohydr. Res. 2005, 340, 1914–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Majtán, J.; Bíliková, K.; Markovič, O.; Gróf, J.; Kogan, G.; Šimúth, J. Isolation and Characterization of Chitin from Bumblebee (Bombus terrestris). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2007, 40, 237–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sajomsang, W.; Gonil, P. Preparation and Characterization of α-Chitin from Cicada Sloughs. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2010, 30, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Socrates, G. Infrared and Raman Characteristic Group Frequencies: Tables and Charts, 3rd ed.; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2010; ISBN 978-0-470-09307-8. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kamal, M.; Adly, E.; Alharbi, S.A.; Khaled, A.S.; Rady, M.H.; Ibrahim, N.A. Exploring Simplified Methods for Insect Chitin Extraction and Application as a Potential Alternative Bioethanol Resource. Insects 2020, 11, 788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tolesa, L.D.; Gupta, B.S.; Lee, M.-J. Chitin and Chitosan Production from Shrimp Shells Using Ammonium-Based Ionic Liquids. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 130, 818–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Alexandri, E.; Ahmed, R.; Siddiqui, H.; Choudhary, M.; Tsiafoulis, C.; Gerothanassis, I. High Resolution NMR Spectroscopy as a Structural and Analytical Tool for Unsaturated Lipids in Solution. Molecules 2017, 22, 1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Duarte, M.L.; Ferreira, M.C.; Marvão, M.R.; Rocha, J. An Optimised Method to Determine the Degree of Acetylation of Chitin and Chitosan by FTIR Spectroscopy. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2002, 31, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kasaai, M.R. Determination of the Degree of N-Acetylation for Chitin and Chitosan by Various NMR Spectroscopy Techniques: A Review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 79, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Achinivu, E.C.; Shamshina, J.L.; Rogers, R.D. Chitin Extracted from Various Biomass Sources: It’s Not the Same. Fluid Phase Equilibria 2022, 552, 113286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wanjun, T.; Cunxin, W.; Donghua, C. Kinetic Studies on the Pyrolysis of Chitin and Chitosan. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2005, 87, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Corazzari, I.; Nisticò, R.; Turci, F.; Faga, M.G.; Franzoso, F.; Tabasso, S.; Magnacca, G. Advanced Physico-Chemical Characterization of Chitosan by Means of TGA Coupled on-Line with FTIR and GCMS: Thermal Degradation and Water Adsorption Capacity. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2015, 112, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Moussout, H.; Ahlafi, H.; Aazza, M.; Bourakhouadar, M. Kinetics and Mechanism of the Thermal Degradation of Biopolymers Chitin and Chitosan Using Thermogravimetric Analysis. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2016, 130, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kaya, M.; Mujtaba, M.; Ehrlich, H.; Salaberria, A.M.; Baran, T.; Amemiya, C.T.; Galli, R.; Akyuz, L.; Sargin, I.; Labidi, J. On Chemistry of γ-Chitin. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 176, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Finke, M.D. Estimate of Chitin in Raw Whole Insects. Zoo Biol. 2007, 26, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of both chitin, where R = COCH3 (acetyl group) is greater than 60%, and chitosan, where R = H is greater than 60%.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of both chitin, where R = COCH3 (acetyl group) is greater than 60%, and chitosan, where R = H is greater than 60%.
Polymers 16 02861 g001
Figure 2. XRD of BSFL samples at the start and at the end of their life cycle; BSFL-IL (a) and BSFL-EL (b), respectively, compared with a commercial chitin (c).
Figure 2. XRD of BSFL samples at the start and at the end of their life cycle; BSFL-IL (a) and BSFL-EL (b), respectively, compared with a commercial chitin (c).
Polymers 16 02861 g002
Figure 3. ATR-FTIR spectra of chitin samples extracted from BSFL at the start and at the end of their life cycle: BSFL-IL (a) and BSFL-EL (b), respectively. The spectrum of a commercial chitin (c) is reported for comparison.
Figure 3. ATR-FTIR spectra of chitin samples extracted from BSFL at the start and at the end of their life cycle: BSFL-IL (a) and BSFL-EL (b), respectively. The spectrum of a commercial chitin (c) is reported for comparison.
Polymers 16 02861 g003
Figure 4. 13C CPMAS NMR spectra of the extracted chitin at the start and at the end of the BSFL life cycle for BSFL-IL (a) and BSFL-EL (b), respectively, compared with a commercial chitin (c). * 13C peaks due to the methylene units of lipids.
Figure 4. 13C CPMAS NMR spectra of the extracted chitin at the start and at the end of the BSFL life cycle for BSFL-IL (a) and BSFL-EL (b), respectively, compared with a commercial chitin (c). * 13C peaks due to the methylene units of lipids.
Polymers 16 02861 g004
Figure 5. Thermograms (TG) and respective first derivative curves (DTG) of the extracted chitin samples BSFL-IL (a, a′) and BSFL-EL (b, b′), compared with a commercial chitin (c, c′).
Figure 5. Thermograms (TG) and respective first derivative curves (DTG) of the extracted chitin samples BSFL-IL (a, a′) and BSFL-EL (b, b′), compared with a commercial chitin (c, c′).
Polymers 16 02861 g005
Table 1. Composition (wt. %) of water, lipids, mineral salts, protein, and chitin for the BSFL-IL and BSFL-EL after drying the materials at 50 °C overnight.
Table 1. Composition (wt. %) of water, lipids, mineral salts, protein, and chitin for the BSFL-IL and BSFL-EL after drying the materials at 50 °C overnight.
SampleWaterLipidMineralProteinChitin
BSFL-IL8.0 ± 1.623.6 ± 5.320.6 ± 3.229.7 ± 3.718.1 ± 2.0
BSFL-EL8.2 ± 1.321.7 ± 4.920.9 ± 2.626.9 ± 4.222.3 ± 2.3
Table 2. Crystal Index (CrI%) of different extracted chitin samples and commercial chitin.
Table 2. Crystal Index (CrI%) of different extracted chitin samples and commercial chitin.
Chitin SourceCrI%
BSFL-IL71.91 ± 0.13
BSFL-EL77.84 ± 0.08
Standard Commercial71.10 ± 0.02
Table 3. Peak positions of the FTIR spectra of the extracted chitin compared with those in the literature.
Table 3. Peak positions of the FTIR spectra of the extracted chitin compared with those in the literature.
Vibrational ModeBand Position [cm−1]
Extracted ChitinCommercial ChitinLiteratureReference
CN amide III1309–131113111320–1310[2,28,44,45]
δ CH31372–137613761370–1375[24]
δ + ν NH, CO1655–1620
1560–1548
1655–1620
1560
1620–1650
1550–1560
[23,25,28,45]
ν CH glucose ring
CH2OH, CH3
2961, 2925,
2855–2889
2875, 2889, 2919, 2925, 29613000–2800[25,28,45]
amide II overtone310231023100–3110[2,24]
ν NH326132613255–3270[2]
ν OH3478–34373478–34373280–3450[2,24,25,28,45]
Table 4. 13C CPMAS NMR peak intensity and the degree of acetylation (DA%) of different chitin samples.
Table 4. 13C CPMAS NMR peak intensity and the degree of acetylation (DA%) of different chitin samples.
Chitin SourcePeaks IntensityDA%
CH3C1C2C3C4C5C6
BSFL-IL11.515111613.5191478
BSFL-EL13.5151413141812.594
Commercial1213151514171482
Table 5. Weight loss % at different temperature ranges for the different chitin samples.
Table 5. Weight loss % at different temperature ranges for the different chitin samples.
Weight Loss %
Temperature RangeBSFL-ILBSFL-ELStandard Commercial
30–150 °C5710
200–400 °C757270
400–700 °C878381
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marangon, A.; Paul, G.; Zaghi, R.; Marchese, L.; Gatti, G. Chitin Extracted from Black Soldier Fly Larvae at Different Growth Stages. Polymers 2024, 16, 2861. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16202861

AMA Style

Marangon A, Paul G, Zaghi R, Marchese L, Gatti G. Chitin Extracted from Black Soldier Fly Larvae at Different Growth Stages. Polymers. 2024; 16(20):2861. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16202861

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marangon, Andrea, Geo Paul, Riccardo Zaghi, Leonardo Marchese, and Giorgio Gatti. 2024. "Chitin Extracted from Black Soldier Fly Larvae at Different Growth Stages" Polymers 16, no. 20: 2861. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16202861

APA Style

Marangon, A., Paul, G., Zaghi, R., Marchese, L., & Gatti, G. (2024). Chitin Extracted from Black Soldier Fly Larvae at Different Growth Stages. Polymers, 16(20), 2861. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16202861

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop