Next Article in Journal
Opacification Kinetics of PLA during Liquid Water Sorption
Previous Article in Journal
Insulin-Loaded Chitosan–Cellulose-Derivative Hydrogels: In Vitro Permeation of Hormone through Strat-M® Membrane and Rheological and Textural Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Elimination of Delamination during the Drilling of Biocomposite Materials with Flax Fibers

Assembly and Engineering Metrology, Department of Machining, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Liberec, 461 17 Liberec, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2024, 16(18), 2620; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16182620
Submission received: 20 August 2024 / Revised: 12 September 2024 / Accepted: 14 September 2024 / Published: 16 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Composites and Nanocomposites)

Abstract

:
The present study focuses on the elimination of delamination during the drilling of a linen-based biocomposite material in epoxy resin used for the manufacture of sports kayaks, depending on the tool material, cutting conditions, and the use of additional wooden support plates. In the present study, HSS (high-speed steel) and Carbide cutting tools without coatings, with the same geometry and two types of cutting conditions (n = 1500 rpm, fn = 0.05 and 0.1 mm/rev) were used. A Sololite-type wooden backing plate was used to aid in reducing delamination. The results show that the additional support plates significantly reduced delamination by up to 80% both at the material inlet and especially at the drill hole outlet. In this study, the use of a lower feed rate (fn = 0.05 mm/rev) per tooth was shown to have a significant effect on reducing the delamination of biocomposite materials with flax fibers, which are generally known to be difficult to machine. The Carbide cutting tool shows significantly better results both in terms of its wear and in terms of delamination of the biocomposite material. The highest delamination was obtained without the use of a backing board at the tool exit after 50 drilled holes of 3509 µm. With the use of a backing board, this delamination decreased to 693 µm after 50 drilled holes.

1. Introduction

Biocomposite materials (hereinafter BCMs) are currently finding significant applications in a wide range of industrial and service sectors, particularly in terms of reducing the environmental impact of these products. The most commonly used reinforcements in these systems are flax fibers or flax fabrics, which have mechanical parameters close to those of synthetically produced fibers, in particular glass fibers. The mechanical parameters of flax fibers are very promising compared with synthetic fibers and offer many possibilities, especially in the current focus on minimizing the environmental impact of materials and technological processes [1,2,3,4,5].
Epoxy resins are still preferably used as matrices for composite systems. The principal disadvantage of reinforcing flax fibers is mainly their wettability, which is due to their chemical composition. For this reason, such materials must be processed and treated to meet the requirements for a specific application. In the manufacture of parts from BCMs, it is very difficult to make holes, cut-outs, grooves, etc., without affecting the fiber system; as the resin matrix is crushed, the fibers are exposed, and the ends fray at the point of contact with the tool [6,7].
When machining composite materials, the reinforcement profile affects the performance of the machining process. Here, the profile represents the arrangement of the fibers, their volume fraction, and the fiber architecture. Because of the anisotropic response of the system, composite materials show a significant difference in machining performance compared with homogeneous materials/metals because at least two diametrically different materials (matrix and reinforcement) are machined simultaneously. For these reasons, investigating the machining response of BCMs is very complicated. Several problems are encountered, usually caused by the high strength of the reinforcement, leading to rapid wear of the cutting tool assembly. BCMs/laminates are made of many layers, which practically predisposes them to the delamination process that results from the destruction of the polymer matrix and the simultaneous pulling out of the reinforcing fibers. The high absorbency of the reinforcing fibers largely limits the use of conventional process fluids in the machining process [8,9,10,11].
Current trends in the use of environmentally acceptable materials such as BCMs are leading to the need to address technological processes such as machining. It is estimated that up to 60% of all scrapped parts are due to poor hole quality, and as the holes are drilled in the last stage of production, scrapping parts because of poor hole quality leads to large economic losses. These defects arising in the machining process can be evaluated by direct observation and control of the resulting damage (delamination, surface roughness, micro-cracks, matrix or fiber burn-out, etc.) depending on the machining conditions [12]. The quality of the machined surface or delamination of BCMs depends on process parameters such as the cutting speed, feed rate, material, geometry of the cutting tool, etc. The choice of optimum process parameters is very important to obtain a high-quality workpiece. For this reason, it is essential to study their responses (delamination, surface roughness, cutting tool wear, etc.) [13,14].
Various studies, such as Belaadi et al. [10] investigated the delamination factor in drilling BCMs (jute/polyester; 5.7 and 10 mm wood drill) and the subsequent optimization of the process to reduce the resulting delamination. The delamination factor was found to be most influenced by the feed rate, reinforcement fiber length, and drill bit diameter. The delamination factor increased with a higher fiber length, higher feed rate, and larger drill bit diameter. Another factor found to be influential is the method of manufacturing the composite laminate. Higher porosity leads to higher delamination. Tool wear has a large influence on the resulting hole quality and is related to the appropriate geometry and material of the cutting tool. Different cutting materials or coatings can lead to different results for a given workpiece. The work by Benyettou [9] investigated the behavior of BCMs (date palm fiber/polyester) drilled with helical HSS drills with coatings (HSS-TiN, HSS-C, and HSS-Co). The best hole quality with respect to delamination was achieved with the HSS-Co drill bit. On the other hand, optimum roundness was achieved with the HSS-TiN drill bit. The best cylindricity was then obtained with the HSS-C drill. Furthermore, the work by Tabeta et al. [15] investigated the effect and optimization of process parameters on BCMs (bi-directional jute fiber and cork-reinforced polymer) during drilling (helical HSS-TiN drill and HSS wood drill; both drill bits had d = 5.7 and 10 mm). They found that the importance of material and the feed rate in relation to drill diameter had a predominant effect on the delamination factor. It was also found that spindle speed had no effect on this factor. The contribution of each element to the optimum drilling conditions was as follows: feed rate (66.04%), drill diameter (10.54%), and then spindle speed.
As aforementioned, a major issue in machining BCMs is delamination. Delamination can be reduced by using backing plates. Backing plates can be used in industrial practice to reduce damage caused by drilling and to ensure good quality of the resulting hole at both the inlet and outlet of the hole [10,16]. The material of the backing plates can be selected according to the characteristics of the material to be machined. The correct choice will reduce delamination, but the wrong choice of backing plate material (thickness, surface roughness, and material) may have the opposite effect and lead to increased delamination or other damage to the work material or increased wear on the cutting tool. Inappropriately selected insert parameters will contribute to higher cutting tool wear, leading to lower efficiency and increased costs [17,18].
This study investigates the effect of backing plates on the amount of delamination produced at the inlet and outlet of the drilled hole. This study is divided into inter-related parts evaluating the effect of the number of holes on cutting tool wear, the effect of the worn tool on the size of delamination, and the elimination of delamination by backing plates. The importance and subsequent applicability of this study are related to the behavior of natural cellulose-based fiber materials, whose major disadvantage is their wettability. Wettability will be a major problem in delamination; the frayed fibers of the flax reinforcement will absorb water and change the mechanical and physical parameters of the component. Verifying the suitability of the choice of reinforcement in accordance with its wear resistance, determining the process conditions, and simultaneously minimizing delamination by using backing plates has significant potential in the machining capabilities of these environmentally friendly materials.
The results of this initial study open further questions about the possibility of machining these materials by other methods [19,20].

2. Materials and Methods

The biocomposite material (BCM) used for this experiment was laminate boards from a Czech manufacturer—Figure 1. The reinforcing fabric is made of long flax fibers with a 2/2 twill weave. The technical parameters are given in Table 1. The matrix material is an epoxy resin with the designation LG 700 (GRM Systems, Olomouc, Czech Republic). The advantages of this resin include extremely low viscosity, which allows the formation of very low-weight laminates, high reactivity, processing time (25 min to 180 min), good temperature resistance even after curing at room temperature, and high flexibility, which is maintained while maintaining excellent temperature resistance. Technical parameters and mechanical properties are given in Table 2 and Table 3. It is a material used in the manufacture of some primary and secondary parts of aircraft and sports kayaks. The laminates were cut into test specimens of 300 mm × 150 mm × 2 mm (length × width × specimen thickness).

2.1. Cutting Tool and Cutting Parameters

The cutting tools were 2 helical drills with a diameter of 6 mm with a tip angle of 118°; these were HSS and Carbide drills without surface treatment, as shown in Table 4 and Figure 2.
Furthermore, two spindle speed levels (500 and 1500 rpm) and two feed rates per revolution (0.05 and 0.1 mm/rev) were determined for this study.
To simulate a real industrial process, machining without process media was performed, as shown in Table 5.
These tools were chosen because of their price, availability on the market, and also because they are the most commonly used tools for conventional machining of composite systems, which were also to be tested for biocomposite materials to see if their performance and properties would suit this specific type of material.

2.2. Machining Machine

The drilling process was carried out on a 3-axis CNC milling machine from the manufacturer DMG MORI type CMX 600V (DMG Mori Seiki, Nagoya, Japan) with a maximum spindle speed capacity of 12,000 rpm.
The samples were clamped in a special jig, as shown in Figure 3, because of the small thickness of the BCM (2 mm), which cannot be clamped in a conventional machine vice.

2.3. Support Plate

The support board chosen for this study was a Sololite-type fiberboard. The dimensions of the board were 300 mm × 150 mm × 3.2 mm (length × width × specimen thickness), as shown in Figure 4. The specimen was placed between two support plates to keep it stable during drilling. The thickness of the plates was deliberately chosen to be higher to ensure the system’s stability.

2.4. Methods for Evaluating Tool Wear and the Delamination of Samples

The analysis/measurement of the amount of cutting tool wear and delamination was carried out using a Keyence VK-X 1000 (Keyence, Itasca, IL, USA) confocal microscope. The measurements were always performed after a fixed number of drilled holes. The measurement interval was determined after drilling the 1st, 10th, 30th, 40th, and 50th holes. The Keyence VK-X 1000 confocal microscope was used to assess cutting tool wear by measuring the linear change/decay in tool edge dimensions. The confocal microscope was also used to assess the extent of delamination at the inlet and outlet by measuring the change like the sample around the drilled hole.

3. Results

Delamination is the most visible and most serious defect that occurs when machining BCMs. Delamination is generally characterized as the separation of layers/laminations of the composite material. In a drilling operation, delamination is distinguished into delamination that occurs at the beginning and end of the hole, i.e., the drill entry and exit. Delamination at the beginning of the hole is the result of torque and may not always be present. Delamination at the end of the hole is the result of the forces generated as the drill bit passes through the material and, unlike entry delamination, is much more noticeable and undesirable as it reduces the quality of the hole, increases the wetting of the system, and has an overall impact on the quality and strength of the composite.
As the drill bit begins to penetrate the composite laminate, the top layer of the laminate breaks and is displaced upwards by the action of the helical drill bit. The fibers are pulled towards the surface of the sample and break the compact top layer of resin. As the cutting tool advances with the downward feed, the worn tool layer helically coils downward with the drill groove. This leads to the drill bit gradually passing through the sample and separating one layer of laminate from the other because of the destruction of both the resin and the fibers. When the transverse blade of the cutting tool reaches the lower layers of the composite laminate, both compressive and tensile forces are applied to the fibers simultaneously with the rotation of the drill bit. The complicated force action on the underside of the specimen and the drill bit entering the free space below the specimen will cause the most noticeable delamination of the composite system Figure 5.
According to the above, delamination is a significant problem when drilling BCMs, so it is important to address the issue and try to eliminate this defect, which subsequently causes a poor quality/poor drilled hole. This study focused on the elimination of delamination of drilled holes using backing plates when using HSS and Carbide cutting tools without surface treatment at the given cutting conditions shown in Table 5. The amount of wear on the cutting tool was measured on both the main and secondary cutting edges. In terms of the BCM delamination analysis, the amount of delamination at both the hole inlet and the hole outlet was measured for each hole. To evaluate the measured results, it was necessary to establish a limiting value for the average magnitude of FDcrit delamination at the inlet and outlet of the drilled hole. There is no industry standard or prescriptive standard for this limit value. In this study, a limiting average value of FDcrit = 1500 µm was chosen.

3.1. Effect of the Number of Holes on Cutting Tool Wear

The measured results shown in Table 6 indicate that at cutting conditions n = 1500 rpm and fn = 0.10 mm/rev, there was higher wear than at n = 1500 rpm and fn = 0.05 mm/rev for both cutting tools for both the main and secondary cutting edges. For HSS, the wear was more pronounced on the secondary blade, while for Carbide, the wear was more pronounced on the main blade. The wear increased continuously with an increasing number of holes.
After drilling 50 holes with the HSS tool, the wear reached the highest values of 16.30 µm and 18.39 µm for n = 1500 rpm and fn = 0.10 mm/rev for the main and secondary cutting edges, as shown in Table 7. The HSS tool gradually failed to cut the threads at the exit of the hole, which led not only to higher delamination and damage to the holes but also to further wear of the secondary blade.
After drilling 50 holes with the Carbide tool, the highest wear was also achieved at cutting conditions of n = 1500 rpm and fn = 0.10 mm/rev, with values of 8.64 µm and 5.77 µm for the main and secondary blades, respectively. The first wear was also observed after drilling 30 holes on the main blade and 40 holes on the secondary blade. However, the cutting tool did not show abrasion wear like the HSS tool.

3.2. Effect of the Number of Holes on Delamination

Based on the measured results, the amount of tool wear affected the amount of delamination. The magnitude of delamination increased with cutting tool wear and with higher feed per revolution, i.e., with cutting conditions n = 1500 rpm and fn = 0.10 mm/rev. The delamination was most pronounced at the outlet holes, as shown in Table 8.
Compared with other composite materials, BCMs are characterized by lower hardness and lower abrasiveness because of the reinforcing flax fibers used. These properties, together with the small thickness of the test specimens used in this study, result in minimal tool wear and therefore minimal effect on the magnitude of delamination at both the inlet and outlet of the hole.
The displacement per revolution has a significant effect on the overall size of the delamination of the drilled hole. The explanation may be that as the feed rate increases, the magnitude of the compressive force of the cutting tool also increases. The cutting tool pushes on the work material, causing matrix cracking, the bending of loose fibers, and the formation of delamination, including its growth.
After drilling 50 holes with the HSS tool, the highest value of delamination was obtained for cutting conditions n = 1500 rpm and fn = 0.10 mm/rev, and the values at the exit of the hole were 3509 µm and, at the entrance, 1990 µm.
After drilling 50 holes with the Carbide tool, the highest delamination value was also obtained for cutting conditions n = 1500 rpm and fn = 0.10 mm/rev, and the values at the exit hole were 2077 µm and, the entrance, 942 µm.
The delamination at the hole exit was always higher than the hole entry for both tools, as shown in Table 9. The delamination increased with higher feed per revolution, i.e., with cutting conditions n = 1500 rpm and fn = 0.10 mm/rev. The low feed rate fn = 0.05 mm/rev contributed to reducing the magnitude of delamination.

3.3. Effect of Support Plates on the Size of Delamination

The use of wooden backing plates resulted in a significant reduction in the amount of delamination at both the inlet and outlet of the drilled hole for both cutting tools, as shown in Table 9.
The wooden support plates, because of their properties as a firm but relatively soft material, were able to adhere firmly to the drilled material, thus preventing fiber deflection before cutting, but also reducing the delamination values of the laminate layers, as shown in Table 10.
For the cutting conditions n = 1500 rpm and fn = 0.05 mm/rev, the wooden backing plates, because of their properties, allowed for reducing the size of delamination for the HSS cutting tool from 3012 µm to 611 µm at the exit and from 1181 µm to 359 µm at the entrance of the drilled hole. For the Carbide cutting tool, the amount of delamination decreased from 1442 µm to 228 µm at the exit and from 597 µm to 125 µm at the entrance of the hole.
At the cutting conditions n = 1500 rpm and fn = 0.1 mm/rev, the delamination of the HSS cutting tool was also reduced when using a wooden backing plate, from 3509 µm to 693 µm at the hole exit and from 1990 µm to 579 µm at the hole entry. For the Carbide cutting tool, the size of delamination also decreased rapidly at the exit from 2077 µm to 299 µm and at the hole entrance from 942 µm to 176 µm.
Because of the use of wooden backing plates, both cutting tools were able to meet the given limiting value of average delamination size (FDkrit = 1500 µm).

4. Discussion

BCMs are now becoming popular because of their favorable cost, weight, and environmental character. They are used for the manufacture of special automotive and aerospace components, bicycle frames, window frames, sports equipment, etc.
BCMs exhibit a weakness at the level of interfacial adhesion between the fibers and matrix, which is related to the high hydrophilicity of natural fibers due to their chemical composition and the hydrophobic nature of synthetic polymer matrices. A further complication is their unstable chemical, physical, and mechanical properties compared with synthetic fibers, which is due to the variable proportion of cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, and other substances affected by plant growth conditions. Other limitations include the range of processing temperatures, low impact resistance, and low thermal stability. The variability in their properties is due to their high dependence on the time and conditions of harvest, the climate of the agricultural site, the soil and weather, agricultural practices, cultivation techniques and plant conditions, mechanical extraction, and bundle production. These disadvantages negatively affect the long-term durability of BCMs, limiting their use to non-structural and semi-structural components (e.g., door panels, dashboards, sports equipment) and thus slowing their integration into high-performance applications. Any modification (drilling, milling, etc.) of BCM components requires a specific approach to designing the machining conditions so that the mechanical properties of BCMs are not significantly compromised.
BCMs are characterized by low abrasion and overall lower hardness compared with other composite materials (e.g., carbon fiber reinforced plastic—CFRP).
For this reason, low wear rates were observed for both the HSS and Carbide cutting tools in the present study. The wear for both cutting tools increased with the number of holes drilled. Further, the wear was dependent on the given cutting conditions. The magnitude of wear reached higher values with higher feed per revolution, i.e., with fn = 0.10 mm/rev. For HSS, the wear reached 16.30 µm for the main cutting edge and 18.39 µm for the secondary cutting edge after 50 holes were drilled. For Carbide, it was 8.64 µm for the main blade and 5.77 µm for the secondary blade.
According to the analysis of the results, the lower feed per revolution fn = 0.05 mm/rev showed to be the best in terms of tool life for both types of tools, i.e., HSS and Carbide. For HSS, it was 13.59 µm for the main blade and 14.39 µm for the secondary blade, and for Carbide, it was 5.66 µm for the main blade and 4.55 µm for the secondary blade, as shown in Table 6 and Table 7.
The improved performance of the Carbide tool is due to the material composition of the drill bit surface, which resists the most corrosive types of materials. Working with natural fibers is very complicated because of the material composition of the fibers and, at the same time, the structure of the fiber, which is itself a composite.
The amount of delamination was measured at the entrance and exit of the drilled hole depending on the cutting conditions. In the experimental measurements, it was shown that as the feed rate increases from fn = 0.05 to 0.1 mm/revolution, the amount of delamination increases both at the inlet and especially at the outlet of the drilled hole. The magnitude of delamination at the outlet was always recorded to be larger than that at the inlet of the drilled hole.
After drilling 50 holes, the highest value of delamination was obtained for cutting conditions n = 1500 rpm and fn = 0.10 mm/rev for both the HSS- and Carbide-type tools. After drilling 50 holes with the HSS tool, the highest delamination value obtained at the exit hole was 3509 µm and at the entrance was 1990 µm, and for Carbide, the high value at the exit hole was 2077 µm and at the entrance was 942 µm. The delamination at the exit of the holes was always higher than at the entrance of the holes for both tools, as shown in Table 9. The lower feed per revolution value fn = 0.05 mm/rev again came out as the best for both types of cutting tools according to the delamination analysis. For HSS, the delamination value at the hole exit after drilling 50 holes was 3012 µm and at the hole entry was 1181 µm, and for Carbide, at the hole exit, it was 1442 µm and at the hole entry, it was 597 µm.
Only the Carbide tool met the predefined threshold value of average delamination size, FDcrit = 1500 µm. The HSS tool failed to meet the limit value. The results obtained are in agreement with the data in the publications by Belaadi et al. [5,6] and Tabeta et al. [4].
The displacement per revolution has a significant effect on the overall size of the delamination of the drilled hole. As the feed rate increases, i.e., fn = 0.05 to fn = 0.10 mm/rev, the size of the delamination increases. The explanation may be that as the feed rate increases, the magnitude of the compressive force of the cutting tool also increases. As the cutting tool pushes on the workpiece, the workpiece defends itself against cutting, matrix cracking, fiber bending, and delamination including its growth.
The micro-cracks caused by drilling are generated when subjected to tension, fatigue loading, or different temperature conditions. Interlaminar cracks, fiber–matrix cracks, and transverse cracks are a group of micro-cracks at the interface. The resulting micro-cracks in the composite progress in the transverse direction and thus, the thickness of the composite significantly affects the mechanical properties of the composite. The formed micro-cracks act as initiators for other types of defects such as delamination, spalling, chipping, or fiber fraying. Fiber collapse occurs because of the presence of moisture in the reinforced fibers of the composite system. Fiber bunching adversely affects the adhesive bond between the fiber and the matrix material. The defects described above lead to interlaminar debonding during the implementation of machining forces. An equally serious problem associated with the drilling of natural fiber composites is the formation of burrs on the surface of the parts caused by delamination of the reinforcing fibers, which subsequently complicates further assembly operations.
Based on this set of facts, it is necessary to minimize the presence of water in biocomposite systems with natural fibers and thus eliminate machining with process fluids. At the same time, delamination at the drill inlet and outlet of the composite system must be minimized.
The experimental measurements showed that the use of backing plates had a significant effect on reducing the magnitude of delamination, especially for both cutting conditions of n = 1500 rpm and fn = 0.05 and 0.1 mm/rev, as shown in Table 9 and Table 10.
For cutting conditions n = 1500 rpm and fn = 0.05 mm/rev, the wooden support plates, because of their properties, allowed for reducing the size of delamination for the HSS cutting tool by about 80% on average at the exit and about 70% at the entrance of the drilled hole. For the Carbide cutting tool, the amount of delamination was reduced by an average of about 84% at the exit and about 79% at the entrance of the drilled hole.
For cutting conditions n = 1500 rpm and fn = 0.1 mm/rev, for the HSS cutting tool, delamination was also reduced with the use of a wooden backing plate by an average of about 80% at the exit and about 71% at the entrance of the drilled hole. For the Carbide cutting tool, there was also a significant reduction in the amount of delamination by about 85% on average at the exit and about 81% at the entrance of the drilled hole.
The use of inexpensive wooden backing plates in the BCM drilling process, compared with the values without the use of backing plates, resulted in a rapid reduction in the magnitude of delamination on the surface of the samples for both cutting tools and cutting conditions. The reduction in delamination at the inlet and outlet of the hole can be explained by the stiffening of the tool–workpiece system, including the jig used. Increasing the stiffness of the machined system is the most important factor according to the experimentally obtained results. Because of the additional plate on the top and bottom of the specimen, pulling the fibers up with the drill bit and pushing the bottom lamin of the composite down is minimized. This reduces pull-up and push-down delamination. Further experiments could be performed regarding the backing plate material and its pressure on the specimen. This issue is underdeveloped, as biocomposites are not yet widely used in engineering practice because of the already-mentioned information on the nature of natural fibers [4].
As a result, both cutting tools met the given limit value for the average size of delamination (FDcrit = 1500 µm).
However, it should be pointed out that each BCM is heterogeneous with different manufacturing defects (poor penetration, formation of porosity, etc.) and different material compositions, which are usually influenced by the properties of the fibers used (dependence on harvest, climate, soil, and weather and on agricultural practices, cultivation techniques, and plant conditions) or mechanical treatment of the fibers. The combination of cutting conditions and cutting tools will affect any BCMs during processing, including varying amounts of delamination.
A comprehensive study of delamination is important not only from the point of view of the actual delamination process, which is influenced by the tool and technological parameters, but especially the impact of delamination. Delamination generally results in a reduction in the mechanical parameters of the component, which is generally undesirable. Delamination in the case of biocomposite materials where cellulose-based fibers are used, i.e., fibers that are easily wetted, is even more complicated as the adsorption and absorption of moisture in these materials can also increase the dimensions of the component. Because of the permeation of moisture through the material along/inside the natural fibers at the molecular level and the potential changes that moisture can induce, the stage of this issue is crucial [19,20].

5. Conclusions

To study the elimination of BCM delamination (with flax fibers) during the drilling process, two cutting tools with the same geometry but different material compositions (HSS and Carbide) and two types of cutting conditions (n = 1500 rpm, fn = 0.05 and 0.1 mm/rev.) were used. To help reduce delamination, a Sololite-type pressed wood fiber backing plate was used.
The following conclusions were drawn from this study:
  • The abrasion wear of the cutting tool increased with an increasing number of drilled holes for both the HSS and Carbide types. Because of the low hardness and abrasiveness of the BCM with flax fibers, the wear was generally low (up to 20 µm for HSS and 10 µm for Carbide) for both types of cutting conditions with a difference in the feed rate per revolution.
  • The shape and size of delamination increased with higher feed per revolution, i.e., from fn = 0.05 to 0.1 mm/rev at speed n = 1500 rpm, and with wear of both the HSS- and Carbide-type cutting tools. Higher delamination values were recorded at the drilled hole output because of the low stiffness of the BCM system and the compressive force exerted by the tool with wear on the main and secondary cutting edges (matrix cracking due to fiber bending instead of cutting, fiber stretching by the tool, etc.). The lower feed rate (fn = 0.05 mm/rev) per tooth contributed to the reduction in the delamination of BCMs.
  • The wooden support plates rapidly reduced delamination both at the entrance and especially at the exit of the drilled hole. Using cutting conditions n = 1500 rpm and fn = 0.05 mm/rev, this was on average about 80% at the exit and about 70% at the entrance of the drilled hole for the HSS cutting tool, and about 84% at the exit and about 79% at the entrance of the drilled hole for the Carbide cutting tool. For cutting conditions n = 1500 rpm and fn = 0.1 mm/rev, the HSS cutting tool reduced delamination by approx. 80% at the exit and approx. 71% at the drill hole entrance. The Carbide cutting tool reduced delamination by approx. 85% at the exit and approx. 81% at the drill hole entrance.
Based on the results of this study, it is evident that when drilling BCMs with laminate thicknesses in the millimeter range, the use of a wooden backing plate leads to stabilization of the machining process and a reduction in delamination at both the input and output by up to 80%. The use of a lower feed rate (fn = 0.05 mm/rev) per tooth also leads to a reduction in delamination, which is essential when using these materials. The Carbide-type cutting tool material shows much better results in terms of both wear and delamination.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.K. and Š.D.; methodology, Š.D.; validation, Š.D.; formal analysis, T.K.; investigation, T.K.; resources, T.K.; data curation, M.V.; writing— original draft preparation, M.V.; writing—review and editing, T.K. and M.V.; visualization, D.K.; supervision, Š.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of this manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the institutional funding of science and research at the Technical University of Liberec and by the Student Grant Competition of the Technical University of Liberec under the project number SGS-2024-5456—“Influence of process parameters on quality of machining biocomposites systems”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of this study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of this manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Goutianos, S.; Peijs, T.; Nystrom, B.; Skrifvars, M. Development of Flax Fibre Based Textile Reinforcements for Composite Applications. Appl. Compos. Mater. 2006, 13, 199–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zouhar, J.; Slaný, M.; Sedlák, J.; Joska, Z.; Pokorný, Z.; Barényi, I.; Majerík, J.; Fiala, Z. Application of Carbon–Flax Hybrid Composite in High Performance Electric Personal Watercraft. Polymers 2022, 14, 1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Oun, A.; Manalo, A.; Alajarmeh, O.; Abousnina, R.; Gerdes, A. Influence of Elevated Temperature on the Mechanical Properties of Hybrid Flax-Fiber-Epoxy Composites Incorporating Graphene. Polymers 2022, 14, 1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ngo, T.-D. Natural Fibers for Sustainable Bio-Composites. In Natural and Artificial Fiber-Reinforced Composites as Renewable Sources; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2017; ISBN 978-1-78923-061-1. [Google Scholar]
  5. Blanchard, J.M.F.A.; Sobey, A.J. Comparative Design of E-Glass and Flax Structures Based on Reliability. Compos. Struct. 2019, 225, 111037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Musa, C.; Zaidi, M.; Depriester, M.; Allouche, Y.; Naouar, N.; Bourmaud, A.; Baillis, D.; Delattre, F. Development of Foam Composites from Flax Gum-Filled Epoxy Resin. J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Schuster, J.; Govignon, Q.; Bickerton, S. Processability of Biobased Thermoset Resins and Flax Fibres Reinforcements Using Vacuum Assisted Resin Transfer Moulding. Open J. Compos. Mater. 2014, 4, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Andrew, J.J.; Dhakal, H.N. Sustainable Biobased Composites for Advanced Applications: Recent Trends and Future Opportunities—A Critical Review. Compos. Part C Open Access 2022, 7, 100220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Benyettou, R.; Amroune, S.; Slamani, M.; Seki, Y.; Dufresne, A.; Jawaid, M.; Alamery, S. Assessment of Induced Delamination Drilling of Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites: A Statistical Analysis. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 21, 131–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Belaadi, A.; Hamdi, L.; Bourchak, M. Mechanical and Drilling Performance of Short Jute Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Biocomposites: Statistical Approach. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 106, 1989–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Varma, M.; Chandran, S.; Vijay Kumar, V.; Suyambulingam, I.; Siengchin, S. A Comprehensive Review on the Machining and Joining Characteristics of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Polymeric Composites. Polym. Compos. 2024, 45, 4850–4875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kroisová, D.; Dvořáčková, Š.; Knap, A.; Knápek, T. Destruction of Carbon and Glass Fibers during Chip Machining of Composite Systems. Polymers 2023, 15, 2888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Raj, S.; Dhas, J.; Jesuthanam, C. Challenges on Machining Characteristics of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Composites—A Review. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2020, 40, 41–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Belaadi, A.; Boumaaza, M.; Amroune, S.; Bourchak, M. Mechanical Characterisation and Optimization of Delamination Factor in Drilling Bidirectional Jute Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Biocomposites. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 111, 2073–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tabet, Z.; Belaadi, A.; Boumaaza, M.; Bourchak, M. Drilling of a Bidirectional Jute Fibre and Cork-Reinforced Polymer Biosandwich Structure: ANN and RSM Approaches for Modelling and Optimization. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2021, 117, 3819–3839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Boopathi, S.; Balasubramani, V.; Kumar, R.S. Influences of Various Natural Fibers on the Mechanical and Drilling Characteristics of Coir-Fiber-Based Hybrid Epoxy Composites. Eng. Res. Express 2023, 5, 015002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Elhadi, A.; Amroune, S.; Slamani, M.; Arslane, M.; Jawaid, M. Assessment and Analysis of Drilling-Induced Damage in Jute/Palm Date Fiber-Reinforced Polyester Hybrid Composite. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Malik, K.; Ahmad, F.; Gunister, E. Drilling Performance of Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites: A Review. J. Nat. Fibers 2021, 19, 4761–4779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lu, M.M.; Fuentes, C.A.; Van Vuure, A.W. Moisture Sorption and Swelling of Flax Fibre and Flax Fibre Composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2022, 231, 109538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vacková, T.; Kroisová, D.; Spatenka, P. Water Desorption Kinetics of Polymer Composites with Cellulose Fibers as Filler. J. Macromol. Sci. 2009, 48, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Machined BCM: (a) sample of the composite material plate and (b) part of the delaminated surface after drilling with loose flax fibers.
Figure 1. Machined BCM: (a) sample of the composite material plate and (b) part of the delaminated surface after drilling with loose flax fibers.
Polymers 16 02620 g001
Figure 2. Drilling tools: (a) HSS drill, (b) Carbide drill, (c) 3D scan of the HSS cutting edge, and (d) 3D scan of the Carbide cutting edge.
Figure 2. Drilling tools: (a) HSS drill, (b) Carbide drill, (c) 3D scan of the HSS cutting edge, and (d) 3D scan of the Carbide cutting edge.
Polymers 16 02620 g002
Figure 3. Clamping jig.
Figure 3. Clamping jig.
Polymers 16 02620 g003
Figure 4. Support plates: (a) Sololite support plate and (b) fixing the sample between the plates.
Figure 4. Support plates: (a) Sololite support plate and (b) fixing the sample between the plates.
Polymers 16 02620 g004
Figure 5. Mechanism of delamination during drilling.
Figure 5. Mechanism of delamination during drilling.
Polymers 16 02620 g005
Table 1. Technical parameters of linen reinforcement.
Table 1. Technical parameters of linen reinforcement.
ParameterValue
Area weight of fabric [g/m2]200
Fiber density [kg/dm3]1.47
Tensile modulus of elasticity [GPa]62
Extension at break [%]1.3–1.4
Water content [% for 22 °C]5–6
WeaveTwill 2/2
Table 2. Technical parameters of epoxy resin.
Table 2. Technical parameters of epoxy resin.
ParameterValue
Density [g/cm3]1.18–1.23
Viscosity [mPa.s]500–700
Epoxy equivalent [mol/kg]156–165
Epoxy index [-]0.6–0.64
Table 3. Mechanical properties of cured epoxy resin without reinforcement.
Table 3. Mechanical properties of cured epoxy resin without reinforcement.
ParameterValue
Strength limit [MPa]110–120
E modul [MPa]2700–3300
Tensile strength limit [MPa]65–75
Compressive strength limit [MPa]120–140
Ductility [%]6–8
Impact toughness [kJ/m2]38–48
Table 4. Parameters of cutting tools.
Table 4. Parameters of cutting tools.
Tool MaterialHSSCarbide
Coating--
Tool diameter [mm]66
Tool length [mm]5728
Tip angle [°]118118
Helical angle [°]3030
Number of cutting edges22
Table 5. Cutting conditions.
Table 5. Cutting conditions.
Cutting ConditionsValue
Spindle speed [rpm]1500
Feed per revolution [mm/rev]0.05, 0.1
Table 6. Analysis of HSS and Carbide cutting tool wear as a function of the number of drilled holes.
Table 6. Analysis of HSS and Carbide cutting tool wear as a function of the number of drilled holes.
HSSCarbide
Cutting ConditionsNumber of HolesWear on the Main Blade [µm] Wear and Tear on
Adjacent Blade [µm]
Wear on the Main Blade [µm]Wear and Tear on
Adjacent Blade [µm]
n = 1500 rpm, fn = 0.05
mm/rev
10.000.000.000.00
100.000.000.000.00
304.287.324.490.00
408.309.004.703.94
5013.5914.395.664.55
n = 1500 rpm, fn = 0.1 mm/rev10.000.000.000.00
100.000.000.000.00
307.2512.485.870.00
4011.5515.967.105.09
5016.3018.398.645.77
The measurement uncertainty was between 0.7 and 0.9 for all values.
Table 7. Example of wear on the main cutting edge of the HSS and Carbide cutting tools depending on the number of holes drilled.
Table 7. Example of wear on the main cutting edge of the HSS and Carbide cutting tools depending on the number of holes drilled.
Cutting Tool—HSS
10 holes(n = 1500 rpm, fn = 0.10 mm/rev)50 holes
Polymers 16 02620 i001Polymers 16 02620 i002
A defect in a cutting tool is a good indication of its wear mechanism, namely, abrasion.
In the red boxes, it is easy to see how the cutting tool back is “polished”—the cutting tool surface becomes increasingly shiny.
Cutting Tool—Carbide
10 holes(n = 1500 rpm, fn = 0.10 mm/rev)50 holes
Polymers 16 02620 i003Polymers 16 02620 i004
As with the HSS cutting tool, abrasion wear occurred, as can be seen in the pictures (red boxes).
Table 8. Delamination size analysis for the HSS and Carbide cutting tools.
Table 8. Delamination size analysis for the HSS and Carbide cutting tools.
Cutting Tool—HSSInOut
n = 1500 rpm,
fn = 0.05 mm/rev
Polymers 16 02620 i005Polymers 16 02620 i006
n = 1500 rpm,
fn = 0.10 mm/rev
Polymers 16 02620 i007Polymers 16 02620 i008
Cutting Tool—CarbideInOut
n = 1500 rpm,
fn = 0.05 mm/rev
Polymers 16 02620 i009Polymers 16 02620 i010
n = 1500 rpm,
fn = 0.10 mm/rev
Polymers 16 02620 i011Polymers 16 02620 i012
Table 9. Analysis of the amount of delamination depending on the used fiberboards for the HSS and Carbide cutting tools.
Table 9. Analysis of the amount of delamination depending on the used fiberboards for the HSS and Carbide cutting tools.
Cutting ToolHSS Carbide
Cutting ConditionsNumber of HolesOutput Delamination [µm]Input Delamination [µm] Output Delamination [µm]Input Delamination [µm]
n = 1500 rpm,
fn = 0.05 mm/rev
1 282710491357534
10 288910631368537
30 295911181343550
40 300811701386552
50 301211811442597
Wood-fiber backing board1 560308205106
10 581318211108
30 598329214112
40 602333220115
50 611359228125
n = 1500 rpm,
fn = 0.1 mm/rev
1 332418221977913
10 337918862002938
30 3397189020481009
40 3462189520561079
50 350919902077942
Wood fiber backing board1 655545271164
10 673556274173
30 681565284167
40 688571283172
50 693579299176
Table 10. Example of the size of delamination without and with a wooden backing plate for the Carbide cutting tool.
Table 10. Example of the size of delamination without and with a wooden backing plate for the Carbide cutting tool.
Cutting Tool—Carbide; n = 1500 rpm, fn = 0.05 mm/rev
Delamination at the Entrance of the Drilled Hole
Without support plateWith a wooden support plate
Polymers 16 02620 i013Polymers 16 02620 i014
Delamination at the exit of the drilled hole
Without support plateWith a wooden support plate
Polymers 16 02620 i015Polymers 16 02620 i016
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Váňa, M.; Dvořáčková, Š.; Knápek, T.; Kroisová, D. Elimination of Delamination during the Drilling of Biocomposite Materials with Flax Fibers. Polymers 2024, 16, 2620. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16182620

AMA Style

Váňa M, Dvořáčková Š, Knápek T, Kroisová D. Elimination of Delamination during the Drilling of Biocomposite Materials with Flax Fibers. Polymers. 2024; 16(18):2620. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16182620

Chicago/Turabian Style

Váňa, Martin, Štěpánka Dvořáčková, Tomáš Knápek, and Dora Kroisová. 2024. "Elimination of Delamination during the Drilling of Biocomposite Materials with Flax Fibers" Polymers 16, no. 18: 2620. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16182620

APA Style

Váňa, M., Dvořáčková, Š., Knápek, T., & Kroisová, D. (2024). Elimination of Delamination during the Drilling of Biocomposite Materials with Flax Fibers. Polymers, 16(18), 2620. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16182620

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop