Figure 1.
Chemical structures of PPAs synthesized from terephthalic (6T) and isophthalic (6I) acids.
Figure 1.
Chemical structures of PPAs synthesized from terephthalic (6T) and isophthalic (6I) acids.
Figure 2.
Schematics of (a) “ball-on-disk” and (b) ”block-on-ring” under dry-friction and oil-lubricated conditions.
Figure 2.
Schematics of (a) “ball-on-disk” and (b) ”block-on-ring” under dry-friction and oil-lubricated conditions.
Figure 3.
The dependences of the mechanical properties of neat PPA and the PPA-based composites on the fiber contents: (a) ultimate tensile strength, (b) elastic modulus, (c) flexural strength, and (d) Charpy impact strength.
Figure 3.
The dependences of the mechanical properties of neat PPA and the PPA-based composites on the fiber contents: (a) ultimate tensile strength, (b) elastic modulus, (c) flexural strength, and (d) Charpy impact strength.
Figure 4.
SEM micrographs of structures of neat PPA and PPA-based composites. (a) Neat PPA, (b) PPA/30SCF, (c) PPA/40CCF, (d) PPA/30SCF, (e) PPA/50CGF.
Figure 4.
SEM micrographs of structures of neat PPA and PPA-based composites. (a) Neat PPA, (b) PPA/30SCF, (c) PPA/40CCF, (d) PPA/30SCF, (e) PPA/50CGF.
Figure 5.
Bar graphs of the tribological characteristics of neat PPA and the PPA-based composites at different P loads: (a) CoF levels, (b) WR values, (c) counterface temperatures; the steel counterface, the “block-on-ring” scheme, the dry sliding friction.
Figure 5.
Bar graphs of the tribological characteristics of neat PPA and the PPA-based composites at different P loads: (a) CoF levels, (b) WR values, (c) counterface temperatures; the steel counterface, the “block-on-ring” scheme, the dry sliding friction.
Figure 6.
The optical micrographs of the surfaces on the steel counterface (b,e,h) and on the wear tacks on neat PPA (a,d,g), as well as the CoF (black curve) and temperature (blue curve) versus distance dependences (c,f,i); the “block-on-ring” scheme, the dry sliding friction; white arrows show the sliding direction.
Figure 6.
The optical micrographs of the surfaces on the steel counterface (b,e,h) and on the wear tacks on neat PPA (a,d,g), as well as the CoF (black curve) and temperature (blue curve) versus distance dependences (c,f,i); the “block-on-ring” scheme, the dry sliding friction; white arrows show the sliding direction.
Figure 7.
The optical micrographs of the wear tracks on the PPA/30SCF (a–c), PPA/40CCF (d–f), PPA/30SGF (g–i) and PPA/50CGF (j–l) composites after the tribological tests at P = 60 (a,d,g,j), 120 (b,e,h,k) and 180 (c,f,i,l) N, V = 0.3 m/s; the steel counterface, the “block-on-ring” scheme, the dry sliding friction.
Figure 7.
The optical micrographs of the wear tracks on the PPA/30SCF (a–c), PPA/40CCF (d–f), PPA/30SGF (g–i) and PPA/50CGF (j–l) composites after the tribological tests at P = 60 (a,d,g,j), 120 (b,e,h,k) and 180 (c,f,i,l) N, V = 0.3 m/s; the steel counterface, the “block-on-ring” scheme, the dry sliding friction.
Figure 8.
The CoF versus distance dependences for the PPA/30SCF and PPA/40CCF (a) as well as PPA/30SGF and PPA/50CGF (b) composites at the P loads of 60, 120 and 180 N; the steel counterface, the “block-on-ring” scheme, the dry sliding friction.
Figure 8.
The CoF versus distance dependences for the PPA/30SCF and PPA/40CCF (a) as well as PPA/30SGF and PPA/50CGF (b) composites at the P loads of 60, 120 and 180 N; the steel counterface, the “block-on-ring” scheme, the dry sliding friction.
Figure 9.
The WR versus CoF Ashby diagram; the steel counterface, the “block-on-ring” scheme, the dry sliding friction. Colored bubbles cluster composites of the same content.
Figure 9.
The WR versus CoF Ashby diagram; the steel counterface, the “block-on-ring” scheme, the dry sliding friction. Colored bubbles cluster composites of the same content.
Figure 10.
The summarized data on the tribological characteristics of the PPA/40CCF composite at the applied P loads: the bar diagrams (a–c) as well as the CoF (black curves) and WR (blue curves) versus load dependences (d,e); the steel (d) and ceramic (e) counterfaces.
Figure 10.
The summarized data on the tribological characteristics of the PPA/40CCF composite at the applied P loads: the bar diagrams (a–c) as well as the CoF (black curves) and WR (blue curves) versus load dependences (d,e); the steel (d) and ceramic (e) counterfaces.
Figure 11.
The optical micrographs of the wear track surfaces on the PPA/40CCF composite after the tribological tests against the ceramic counterface under the dry friction conditions (a–c), as well as after the test against the steel (d–f) and ceramic (g–i) counterfaces under the oil lubricated conditions; the linear contact, P = 60 (a,d,g), 120 (b,e,h) and 180 (c,f,i) N, V = 0.3 m/s. White arrows show the sliding direction.
Figure 11.
The optical micrographs of the wear track surfaces on the PPA/40CCF composite after the tribological tests against the ceramic counterface under the dry friction conditions (a–c), as well as after the test against the steel (d–f) and ceramic (g–i) counterfaces under the oil lubricated conditions; the linear contact, P = 60 (a,d,g), 120 (b,e,h) and 180 (c,f,i) N, V = 0.3 m/s. White arrows show the sliding direction.
Figure 12.
The wear track profiles on the PPA/40CCF composite after the tribological tests against the steel (a,c) and ceramic (b,d) counterfaces under the dry friction and oil lubricated conditions; the linear tribological contact, P = 60, 120 and 180 N, V = 0.3 m/s.
Figure 12.
The wear track profiles on the PPA/40CCF composite after the tribological tests against the steel (a,c) and ceramic (b,d) counterfaces under the dry friction and oil lubricated conditions; the linear tribological contact, P = 60, 120 and 180 N, V = 0.3 m/s.
Figure 13.
The CoF (a,b) and temperature (c,d) versus distance dependences for the PPA/40CCF composite during the tribological tests against the steel and ceramic counterfaces under the dry friction (a,c) and oil lubricated (b,d) conditions; the linear tribological contact, P = 60, 120 and 180 N, V = 0.3 m/s.
Figure 13.
The CoF (a,b) and temperature (c,d) versus distance dependences for the PPA/40CCF composite during the tribological tests against the steel and ceramic counterfaces under the dry friction (a,c) and oil lubricated (b,d) conditions; the linear tribological contact, P = 60, 120 and 180 N, V = 0.3 m/s.
Figure 14.
The CoF versus WR Ashby diagram for the PPA/40CCF composite under the dry friction and oil lubricated conditions; the steel and ceramic counterfaces, the linear tribological contact, P = 60, 120 and 180 N, V = 0.3 m/s. Colored bubbles cluster composites of the same content.
Figure 14.
The CoF versus WR Ashby diagram for the PPA/40CCF composite under the dry friction and oil lubricated conditions; the steel and ceramic counterfaces, the linear tribological contact, P = 60, 120 and 180 N, V = 0.3 m/s. Colored bubbles cluster composites of the same content.
Figure 15.
The summarized data on the tribological characteristics of the PPA/40CCF composite at different V sliding speeds: the bar diagrams (a–c) as well as the CoF (black curves) and WR (blue curves) versus sliding speed dependences (d,e); the steel (d) and ceramic (e) counterfaces.
Figure 15.
The summarized data on the tribological characteristics of the PPA/40CCF composite at different V sliding speeds: the bar diagrams (a–c) as well as the CoF (black curves) and WR (blue curves) versus sliding speed dependences (d,e); the steel (d) and ceramic (e) counterfaces.
Figure 16.
The optical micrographs of the wear track surfaces on the PPA/40CCF composite after the tribological tests against the steel (a,b,e,f) and ceramic (c,d,g,h) counterfaces; the dry friction (a–d) and oil lubricated (e–h) conditions; the linear tribological contact, P = 60 N, V = 0.5 (a,c,e,g) and 0.7 (b,d,f,h) m/s.
Figure 16.
The optical micrographs of the wear track surfaces on the PPA/40CCF composite after the tribological tests against the steel (a,b,e,f) and ceramic (c,d,g,h) counterfaces; the dry friction (a–d) and oil lubricated (e–h) conditions; the linear tribological contact, P = 60 N, V = 0.5 (a,c,e,g) and 0.7 (b,d,f,h) m/s.
Figure 17.
Wear track profiles on the PPA/40CCF composite after the tribological tests against the steel (a,c) and ceramic (b,d) counterfaces under the dry friction (a,b) and oil lubricated (c,d) conditions; the linear tribological contact, P = 60 N, V = 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7 m/s.
Figure 17.
Wear track profiles on the PPA/40CCF composite after the tribological tests against the steel (a,c) and ceramic (b,d) counterfaces under the dry friction (a,b) and oil lubricated (c,d) conditions; the linear tribological contact, P = 60 N, V = 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7 m/s.
Figure 18.
The CoF (a,b) and temperature (c,d) versus distance dependences for the PPA/40CCF composite during the tribological tests against the steel and ceramic counterfaces under the dry-friction (a,c) and oil-lubricated (b,d) conditions; the linear tribological contact, P = 60 N, V = 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7 m/s.
Figure 18.
The CoF (a,b) and temperature (c,d) versus distance dependences for the PPA/40CCF composite during the tribological tests against the steel and ceramic counterfaces under the dry-friction (a,c) and oil-lubricated (b,d) conditions; the linear tribological contact, P = 60 N, V = 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7 m/s.
Figure 19.
The CoF versus WR Ashby diagram for the PPA/40CCF composite under the dry-friction and oil-lubricated conditions; the steel and ceramic counterfaces, the linear tribological contact, P = 60 N, V = 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7 m/s. Colored bubbles cluster the same tribological conditions.
Figure 19.
The CoF versus WR Ashby diagram for the PPA/40CCF composite under the dry-friction and oil-lubricated conditions; the steel and ceramic counterfaces, the linear tribological contact, P = 60 N, V = 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7 m/s. Colored bubbles cluster the same tribological conditions.
Figure 20.
The CoF versus distance dependences for the PPA/40CCF composite upon testing against the steel (a,b) and ceramic (c,d) counterfaces under dry-friction (a,c) and oil-lubricated (b,d) conditions; the point tribological contact.
Figure 20.
The CoF versus distance dependences for the PPA/40CCF composite upon testing against the steel (a,b) and ceramic (c,d) counterfaces under dry-friction (a,c) and oil-lubricated (b,d) conditions; the point tribological contact.
Figure 21.
Optical micrographs of the surfaces on the steel counterface (a,d,g,j) and on the wear tracks of the PPA/40CCF composite (b,e,h,k), as well as their profiles (c,f,i,l) after the tribological tests against the steel (a–f) and ceramic (g–l) counterfaces under the dry-friction (a–c,g–i) and oil-lubricated (d–f,j–l) conditions; the point tribological contact.
Figure 21.
Optical micrographs of the surfaces on the steel counterface (a,d,g,j) and on the wear tracks of the PPA/40CCF composite (b,e,h,k), as well as their profiles (c,f,i,l) after the tribological tests against the steel (a–f) and ceramic (g–l) counterfaces under the dry-friction (a–c,g–i) and oil-lubricated (d–f,j–l) conditions; the point tribological contact.
Figure 22.
Three-dimensional Ashby diagrams summarizing the relationships between the CoF levels, the WR values, and the counterpart temperatures for the PPA/40CCF composite at the applied both P loads (a) and V sliding speeds (b).
Figure 22.
Three-dimensional Ashby diagrams summarizing the relationships between the CoF levels, the WR values, and the counterpart temperatures for the PPA/40CCF composite at the applied both P loads (a) and V sliding speeds (b).
Figure 23.
SEM micrographs of the wear track surfaces after the tribological tests in the linear contacts against the steel (a,b) and ceramic (c,d) counterfaces under the dry-friction (a,c) and oil-lubricated (b,d) conditions at the P load of 60 N and the V sliding speed of 0.3 m/s.
Figure 23.
SEM micrographs of the wear track surfaces after the tribological tests in the linear contacts against the steel (a,b) and ceramic (c,d) counterfaces under the dry-friction (a,c) and oil-lubricated (b,d) conditions at the P load of 60 N and the V sliding speed of 0.3 m/s.
Table 1.
Functional properties and cost of PPA and some other HPPs for comparison [
11].
Table 1.
Functional properties and cost of PPA and some other HPPs for comparison [
11].
Properties | PA12 | PPA | PPS | PEEK |
---|
Density, g/cm3 | 1.04 | 1.18 | 1.35 | 1.32 |
Melting point, °C | 180 | 310–330 | 280–290 | 365–375 |
Glass transition temperature, °C | 40–50 | 121–138 | 90 | 150–160 |
Heat deformation temperature, °C | 40–50 | 120 | 110 | 152 |
Modulus of elasticity, GPa | 1.4 | 2.5–3.5 | 2.5 | 4.5 |
Tensile strength, MPa | 50–60 | 90 | 75 | 90–100 |
Elongation at break (%) | 300 | 6 | 15 | 20 |
Cost ($/kg) | 9 | 5.2 | 7.5 | 65 |
Table 2.
The grades and the key characteristics of neat PPA and PPA-based composites.
Table 2.
The grades and the key characteristics of neat PPA and PPA-based composites.
No. | Grade | Key Characteristics | Approximate Fiber Length/Diameter, μm * | Manufacturer | Country | Designation |
---|
1 | N100 | Neat PPA with a melting point of 320 °C and a glass transition temperature of ~123 °C; used as a matrix material for the fabrication of the composites. | - | Zhejiang NHU Comp. Ltd. (Shaoxing, China) | China | Neat PPA |
2 | KY-H90C30 | PPA reinforced with 30 wt.% SCFs. | 2000/10 | Xiamen keyuan Plastic Co., Ltd. (Xiamen, China) | China | PPA/30SCF |
3 | PPA-NA-LGF40 | PPA reinforced with 40 wt.% continuous CFs (CCFs); characterized by improved strength properties. | 2000/10 | Xiamen LFT Composite plastic Co., Ltd. (Xiamen, China) | China | PPA/40CCF |
4 | Amodel AS-1133 HS | PPA reinforced with 30 wt.% SGFs; heat stabilized. | 8000/8 | Solvay (Brussels, Belgium) | Belgium | PPA/30SGF |
5 | PPA-GFs-AF | PPA reinforced with 50 wt.% continuous GFs (CGFs); characterized by improved strength properties at a relatively low cost. | 8000/18 | DKM Engineering, Ekaterinburg, Russia/ISPMS SB RAS. Tomsk, Russia | Russia | PPA/50CGF |
Table 3.
Physical and mechanical properties of neat PPA and PPA-based composites.
Table 3.
Physical and mechanical properties of neat PPA and PPA-based composites.
No. | Properties | Neat PPA | PPA/30SGF | PPA/30SCF | PPA/40CCF | PPA/50CGF |
---|
1 | Density, g/cm3 | 1.20 | 1.45 | 1.59 | 1.31 | 1.58 |
2 | Calculated density (relative to neat PPA) | 1.00 | 1.23 | 1.35 | 1.12 | 1.16 |
3 | Fiber content, vol. % | – | 17.4% | 24.8% | 30% | 31.6% |
4 | Approximate fiber length/diameter, μm | – | 2000/10 | 2000/10 | 8000/8 | 8000/18 |
5 | Melt flow rate, g/10 min (275 °C/2.16 kg) | 49.5 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
6 | Water absorption in 24 h, % | 0.18 ± 0.03 | 0.22 ± 0.03 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.22 ± 0.03 | 0.24 ± 0.04 |
7 | Elastic modulus *, GPa | 3.31 ± 0.09 | 9.01 ± 0.28 | 12.79 ± 0.56 | 33.67 ± 1.85 | 17.65 ± 0.55 |
8 | Ultimate tensile strength *, MPa | 97.72 ± 6.91 | 113.14 ± 9.70 | 142.72 ± 12.47 | 240.00 ± 3.00 | 207.00 ± 1.00 |
9 | Flexural strength *, MPa | 147.6 ± 16.8 | 172.2 ± 13.5 | 250.3 ± 18.6 | 394.0 ± 11.0 | 264.0 ± 6.0 |
10 | Charpy impact strength *, kJ/m2 | 12.3 ± 3.1 | 21.6 ± 4.1 | 44.5 ± 7.3 | 55.8 ± 4.5 | 51.5 ± 2.9 |
11 | Shore D hardness * | 79.4 ± 0.3 | 76.7 ± 0.6 | 77.7 ± 0.5 | 82.1 ± 1.2 | 80.5 ± 1.3 |
Table 4.
The tribological characteristics of neat PPA and the PPA-based composites; the steel counterface, the “block-on-ring” scheme.
Table 4.
The tribological characteristics of neat PPA and the PPA-based composites; the steel counterface, the “block-on-ring” scheme.
No. | Composite | CoF | WR, mm3/N·m, 10−6 | Temperature, °C |
---|
60 N | 120 N | 180 N | 60 N | 120 N | 180 N | 60 N | 120 N | 180 N |
---|
1 | Neat PPA | 0.45 ± 0.03 | 0.45 ± 0.04 | 0.57 ± 0.09 | 44.85 ± 1.1 | 55.04 ± 0.79 | 57.84 ± 3.98 | 32 ± 1 | 45 ± 5 | 70 ± 16 |
2 | PPA/30SCF | 0.26 ± 0.03 | 0.30 ± 0.02 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 12.74 ± 1.45 | 16.64 ± 1.66 | 22.13 ± 0.44 | 26 ± 1 | 26 ± 2 | 37 ± 2 |
3 | PPA/40CCF | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.01 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 2.33 ± 0.31 | 2.41 ± 0.14 | 3.47 ± 0.16 | 28 ± 1 | 23 ± 1 | 27 ± 1 |
4 | PPA/30SGF | 0.28 ± 0.04 | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | 36.62 ± 2.04 | 37.57 ± 0.66 | 56.75 ± 4.77 | 27 ± 1 | 29 ± 1 | 50 ± 4 |
5 | PPA/50CGF | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.33 ± 0.01 | 0.37 ± 0.01 | 3.36 ± 0.31 | 3.77 ± 0.24 | 3.81 ± 0.22 | 28 ± 1 | 29 ± 1 | 31 ± 3 |
Table 5.
The tribological characteristics of the PPA/40CCF composite; the steel and ceramic counterfaces, the “block-on-ring” scheme; load variation.
Table 5.
The tribological characteristics of the PPA/40CCF composite; the steel and ceramic counterfaces, the “block-on-ring” scheme; load variation.
No. | Composite; Test Conditions | CoF | WR, mm3/N·m, 10−6 | Temperature, °C |
---|
60 N | 120 N | 180 N | 60 N | 120 N | 180 N | 60 N | 120 N | 180 N |
---|
1 | PPA/40CCF; metal, dry | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.01 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 2.33 ± 0.31 | 2.41 ± 0.14 | 3.47 ± 0.16 | 28 ± 1 | 23 ± 1 | 27 ± 1 |
2 | PPA/40CCF; ceramic, dry | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 1.07 ± 0.20 | 1.59 ± 0.36 | 3.05 ± 0.38 | 40 ± 2 | 47 ± 2 | 61 ± 3 |
3 | PPA/40CCF; metal, oil | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.55 ± 0.07 | 0.29 ± 0.04 | 0.35 ± 0.04 | 25 ± 1 | 28 ± 2 | 35 ± 2 |
4 | PPA/40CCF; ceramics, oil | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.19 ± 0.04 | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 25 ± 1 | 32 ± 1 | 37 ± 1 |
Table 6.
The tribological characteristics of the PPA/40CCF composite; the steel and ceramic counterfaces, the “block-on-ring” scheme; sliding speed variation.
Table 6.
The tribological characteristics of the PPA/40CCF composite; the steel and ceramic counterfaces, the “block-on-ring” scheme; sliding speed variation.
No. | Composite | CoF | WR, mm3/N·m, 10−6 | Temperature, °C |
---|
0.3 m/s | 0.5 m/s | 0.7 m/s | 0.3 m/s | 0.5 m/s | 0.7 m/s | 0.3 m/s | 0.5 m/s | 0.7 m/s |
---|
1 | PPA/40CCF; steel, dry | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 2.33 ± 0.31 | 1.58 ± 0.23 | 2.63 ± 0.28 | 28 ± 1 | 24 ± 1 | 25 ± 1 |
2 | PPA/40CCF; ceramic, dry | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.1 ± 0.02 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 1.07 ± 0.2 | 0.99 ± 0.18 | 0.37 ± 0.05 | 40 ± 2 | 47 ± 2 | 49 ± 4 |
3 | PPA/40CCF; steel, oil | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.009 ± 0.01 | 0.008 ± 0.01 | 0.55 ± 0.07 | 0.019 ± 0.01 | 0.022 ± 0.01 | 25 ± 1 | 27 ± 1 | 26 ± 1 |
4 | PPA/40CCF; ceramics, oil | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.017 ± 0.01 | 0.014 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 25 ± 1 | 27 ± 1 | 30 ± 1 |
Table 7.
The tribological characteristics of the PPA/40CCF composite; the steel and ceramic counterfaces, the “ball-on-disk” scheme.
Table 7.
The tribological characteristics of the PPA/40CCF composite; the steel and ceramic counterfaces, the “ball-on-disk” scheme.
Composite | CoF | WR, mm3/N·m, 10−6 |
---|
Steel | Ceramic | Steel | Ceramic |
---|
Dry | Oil | Dry | Oil | Dry | Oil | Dry | Oil |
---|
PPA/40CCF | 0.270 ± 0.006 | 0.050 ± 0.003 | 0.240 ± 0.010 | 0.060 ± 0.002 | 18.9 ± 6.4 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 5.4 ± 2.2 | 1.5 ± 0.5 |