Next Article in Journal
Comparative Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear (LAOS) Study of Ionically and Physically Crosslinked Hydrogels
Next Article in Special Issue
Physicochemical Properties of Chitosan from Green Mussel Shells (Perna viridis): A Comparative Study
Previous Article in Journal
Durability, Strength, and Erosion Resistance Assessment of Lignin Biopolymer Treated Soil
Previous Article in Special Issue
Response Surface Methodology (RSM) Approach to Optimization of Coagulation-Flocculation of Aquaculture Wastewater Treatment Using Chitosan from Carapace of Giant Freshwater Prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment and Optimization of Thermal Stability and Water Absorption of Loading Snail Shell Nanoparticles and Sugarcane Bagasse Cellulose Fibers on Polylactic Acid Bioplastic Films

by
Oluwatoyin J. Gbadeyan
1,2,*,
Linda Z. Linganiso
2 and
Nirmala Deenadayalu
1,2
1
Green Engineering Research Focus Area, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4001, South Africa
2
Department of Chemistry, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4001, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(6), 1557; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15061557
Submission received: 17 January 2023 / Revised: 13 March 2023 / Accepted: 17 March 2023 / Published: 21 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Polysaccharide: Synthesis, Modification and Application)

Abstract

:
The optimization and modeling of the parameters, the concentration of polylactic acid (PLA), sugarcane bagasse cellulose fibers (SBCF), and snail shell nanoparticles (SSNP), were investigated for the development of bioplastic films. With the aid of the Box–Behnken experimental design, response surface methodology was used to assess the consequence of the parameters on the water absorption and thermal stability of fabricated bioplastic films. Varied water absorption and thermal stability with different component loading were obtained, evidencing the loading effect of snail shell nanoparticles and sugar bagasse cellulose fibers on bioplastic film’s water absorption and thermal stability. The quadratic polynomial model experiment data offered a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.8422 for water absorption and 0.8318 for thermal stability, verifying the models’ fitness to develop optimal concentration. The predicted optimal parameters were polylactic acid (99.815%), sugarcane bagasse cellulose fibers (0.036%), and snail shell nanoparticles (0.634%). The bioplastic developed with optimized concentrations of each component exhibited water absorption and thermal stability of 0.45% and 259.7 °C, respectively. The FTIR curves of bioplastic films show oxygen stretching in-plane carbon and single-bonded hydroxyl bending in the carboxylic acids functional group. SEM and TEM images of the bioplastic showed dispersion of the nanoparticles in the matrix, where SSNP is more visible than SBCF, which may be due to the lesser loading of SBCF. The improved properties suggest an optimum concentration of naturally sourced resources for developing bioplastic, which may be used for food and drug packaging for delivery.

1. Introduction

Plastics have become part of our daily life as they are widely used for several applications [1]. Plastic usage in different industries, including electrical and electronic, telecommunications, clothing, and food industries, increased the amount of waste plastic in our environment and water [1]. Besides, plastic, being lightweight, durable, and low cost, has increased been subject to increased demand for packaging, especially in the medical, agricultural, and food industries [2]. The increasing demand for plastic consequently increases its waste. According to United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the amount of plastic generated globally in 2018 was roughly 360 million tons and is forecast to increase at an annual compound growth rate of 4.2% between 2021 and 2028 [3]. Most plastic in circulation, either thermoplastic or thermosetting, is chemically produced. Plastics are widely deployed in several applications due to their availability, durability, and easy processability [4]. Despite the robustness and durability of these chemically produced plastics, they contain toxic elements dumped into the environment and harm the ecosystem [4,5,6]. They also present ecological hazards to the environment and human health due to their resistance to natural forces.
Consequently, plastic waste is often controlled by dumping it into landfills, and some countries choose to burn it. However, larger land spaces that could be used for farming are used for this purpose, threatening the ecosystem’s stability [7]. Similarly, burning petroleum-based plastics emits CO2 into the atmosphere, threatening human and aquatic life [8,9,10]. Several sensitizations on these concerns are ongoing to accelerate the reduction of petrochemical-sourced plastic [11,12,13]. Besides, the continually used of these materials may not alleviate the havoc caused by plastic materials on the ecosystem because these materials contain some toxic elements. Therefore, a combination of biodegradable materials is needed to develop bioplastic to get a lasting solution to the damage wrought by waste plastic on the environment, which means transferring from petrochemical-sourced plastic to naturally sourced bioplastic. Given this, researchers have developed different naturally resourced bioplastics and films to serve as alternative plastic materials. Several bioplastics have been developed using chemically processed, biobased polymers, such as poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA), polylactic acid (PLA), and polycarbonate (PC) with effective biodegradable content [3,4]. These materials have become a choice of material for developing bioplastic films [14,15,16]. However, their drawbacks include inadequate strength and stiffness with poor thermal stress resistance, which opens research opportunities for other suitable additives to improve the properties of the plastics.
Several organic and inorganic reinforcements have been incorporated to improve bioplastic properties, which may be single or hybrid fillers. The enhancement of the bioplastic’s properties is aimed at increasing the suitability of bioplastic as a potential alternative to petrochemical-sourced plastic. Several filters have been employed to produce bioplastic with improved thermomechanical properties [17,18,19,20]. Factors, such as particle sizes and incorporated reinforcement, often significantly affect bioplastic production and properties. Consequently, researchers incorporated single filler to improve bioplastic thermomechanical and physical properties and [3,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Despite numerous studies on improving bioplastic films by incorporating reinforcements, there are limited studies where polylactic acid reinforced with sugarcane bagasse cellulose fibers (SBCF) hybridized with snail shell nanoparticles (SSNP) are reported.
Our previous study showed the reinforcement effect of snail shell nanoparticles (SSNP) on PLA thermal stability at low loading [4,25,26,27]. Incorporating sugarcane bagasse cellulose fibers (SBCF) has been shown to potentially improve thermal stability and rheological and optical properties [28,29,30,31,32]. Therefore, combining these fillers into PLA is anticipated to produce bioplastic films with enhanced properties. Nevertheless, the fillers loading ratio often has substantial effects on the properties of bioplastic material, which may be either negative or positive. However, limited literature reports the loading optimization of additives to produce bioplastic with improved properties. Therefore, investigation towards optimizing the loading percentages of fillers to develop bioplastic with improved properties is needed. Optimization of sugarcane bagasse cellulose fibers and snail shell nanoparticles concentration on the water absorption and thermal stability of PLA-based bioplastic films is the primary aim of this study. The effect of these loading parameters was investigated using a response surface methodology (RSM) design of experiments.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Materials

Polylactic acid (PLA bioplastic pellets) used as a binder was supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Acetone with 99.90% purity adopted for liquifying PLA bioplastic pellets was purchased from Laboratory and Analytical supplies in Durban, South Africa. Snail shell nanoparticles and sugarcane bagasse cellulose fibers produced through extraction were used as reinforcement. The snail shell nanoparticles containing 100% calcium carbonate with 100% purity and aragonite polymorph structures shown in Figure 1 were produced using mechanochemical techniques (ball milling) at the chemical department of the Durban University of Technology, South Africa [26].

2.1.1. Techniques for Cellulose Fibers Extraction from Sugarcane Bagasse

Cellulose fibers were extracted from sugarcane bagasse by milling into smaller sizes ranging from 1 to 5 mm. These cellulose fibers were extracted using alkali treatment, bleaching, and acid hydrolysis. The chopped fiber was treated with alkali chemicals using a 6% sodium hydroxide (NaOH)/distilled water solution. Forty grams of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) were dissolved in 800mL of distilled water. Then, 70 g of fibers were drenched in sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution for 30 min. This process removes lignin, hemicellulose, wax, and oils from the fiber. Then, the bleaching process followed and completed in three stages. Before bleaching, the fiber was dehydrated in an oven at 60 °C for 4 h. Then, the dehydrated fibers were drenched in concentrated sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution for 30 min. This process was repeated thrice. The fibers were rinsed in distilled water to get rid of residue chemicals and dehydrated at 60 °C for 4 h. This process was repeated twice to ensure purification. The fiber was then hydrolyzed with acid [35] in a sulfuric acid solution. The sulfuric acid and distilled water were diluted using a 1.10 mixing ratio. After that, impurities and excess sulfuric acid in the fiber were eliminated by rinsing the fiber in running distilled water to eliminate impurities and excess sulfuric acid in the fiber. The fibers were placed in an oven and dried at 60 °C for 4 h, and then ground and sieved to obtain 16 g of cellulose nanoparticle fibers with an average size of 0.75 microns.

2.1.2. Experimental Design and Optimization of Bioplastic Film Production

The Box–Behnken method of design expert software was used to design the number of trials runs for optimizing bioplastic film production. Three independent variables in the range of 99–100 wt.% for PLA, 0.1 wt.% for SBCF, and 0.5–1 wt.% for SSNP were used, and water absorption and thermal stability were considered as the dependent variables. In this regard, the software above generated seventeen investigational runs, as shown in Table 1.
The investigational data were inputted into the polynomial quadratic model equation to narrate the independent and the dependable variables, in agreement with Equation (1).
Y = Ƌ0 + Ƌ1X1 + Ƌ 2X2 + Ƌ 3X3 + Ƌ 11X1X1 + Ƌ12X1X2 + Ƌ 13X1X4 + ժ11X12 + ժ22X22 + ժ33X3
where Y signified the response outputs and Ƌ0 the intercept; the linear coefficient was obtained from Ƌ 1X1 to Ƌ 4X4; Ƌ12X1X2 to Ƌ23X2X4 represents the interactive coefficients, and Ƌ11X12 to Ƌ33X32 the quadratic coefficients. The consequence validation of the model was assessed by evaluating variance (ANOVA) with a 95% confidence interval (CI band). Three-dimensional response surface plots were fashioned to evaluate the interaction of variable parameters.

2.1.3. Bioplastic Preparation

PLA-based bioplastic reinforced with snail shell nanoparticles and sugarcane bagasse cellulose fibers was prepared via solvent casting. This fabrication process was conducted in four stages. The cellulose fibers from sugarcane bagasse extraction mentioned above were the first stage. The second step was drying PLA bioplastic pellets to ensure the granules’ hydrophobicity and the PLA’s liquifying in solvent (acetone). The dispersion of the snail shell nanoparticles and sugarcane bagasse cellulose fibers in the PLA/acetone solution, which is the third step, followed. The fourth step involved forming bioplastic films in a mold. In the first step, 100 g of PLA bioplastic pellets were measured and dried at 60 °C in a vacuum oven for 30 min to remove moisture. PLA bioplastic pellets were liquified in acetone using a 1:20 liquifying ratio. The PLA bioplastic pellet and acetone portion were measured into a container and covered for 72 h with a lid. Afterward, the PLA/acetone blend was mechanically stirred at 500 rpm to ensure the complete suspension of PLA. The PLA bioplastic pellets blend was allowed to settle to avert bubbles that caused porosity in plastic material. Then, sugarcane bagasse cellulose fibers and snail shell nanoparticles were slowly added to PLA/acetone blend according to the design presented in Table 1 and stirred further at 500 rpm for 15 min to facilitate uniform dispersion of the PVA, sugarcane bagasse cellulose fibers, and snail shell nanoparticles. Later, the blend was poured into an open-plastic mold coated with wax and cured for 72 h at ambient temperature. However, the bioplastic film shown in Figure 2 was characterized after two weeks to ensure maximum sample curing.

2.1.4. Water Immersion

The water absorption of snail shell nanoparticles and sugarcane bagasse cellulose fibers reinforced polylactic acid was determined by immersing it in 100 mL of water for 24 h at ambient temperature. This investigation was conducted according to ASTM D570-98 standard test specifications. Before immersion, the bioplastic firm was dried in the oven at 60 °C for 2 h to dehydrate the sample. Then, the initial weight (T1) of five samples was taken for each bioplastic with different formulations. The samples were removed from the oven, immersed in water for 24 h at room temperature, wiped with a dry napkin, and weighed to determine the final weight of samples (T2) using a Pioneer digital electronic scale with 0.0001 g precision (Model PA214) manufactured in China. Water absorption % was measured using the equation below.
T B = T 2 T 1 T 1 × 100
where TB = the percentage of water absorption, and the average TB value of the five samples is reported [25,35].

2.1.5. Thermal Properties

Bioplastic thermal stability was determined on a thermal Analyser (Mettler Toledo TGA) with STARe software supplied by Microsep South Africa. The test was conducted under an inert atmosphere using a 100 mL/min dry nitrogen gas flow rate at 10 °C/min heating rate from 25 °C to 600 °C.

2.1.6. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopic Analysis

The functional group of the bioplastic was determined on Fourier to transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). A universal attenuated total reflectance module was used for the spectra of the analyzed samples in a wavenumber range between 4000 and 600 cm−1.

2.1.7. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis

The bioplastic microstructural properties were investigated to determine particle dispersion in the matrix and the mechanism governing the developed bioplastic properties. This microstructure investigation was conducted using ZAISS ultra FEG-SEM. Before the investigation, the bioplastic sample’s surface was gold-coated with an electronic thin gold.

2.1.8. Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM)

The dispersion of snail shells nanoparticles was observed under a Philips CM120 BioTWIN transmission electron microscope (TEM). The microscopic investigation was carried out on specimens prepared using a KB/Wallac Type 8801 Ultramicrotome with Ultratome III 8802A Control Unit. Ultra-thin transverse sections approximately 80–100 nm thick were cut at room temperature using a diamond knife and supported by 100 copper mesh grids sputter-coated with a 3-nm-thick carbon layer.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Bionaoparticle Optimization for Bioplastic Films Development

Table 2 shows water absorption and thermal stability of snail shell nanoparticles and sugarcane bagasse cellulose fibers reinforced polylactic acid developed using varied loading of SSNP, SBCF, and PLA. The relationship between the bioplastic films’ water absorption, thermal stability, and different loadings were generated using second-order polynomial Equations (2) and (3).
Water absorption (%) = +1.36 + 0.0386A + 0.3691B − 0.5983C − 0.0523AB − 0.1481AC − 0.05245BC + 0.3611A2 + 0.5932B2 − 0.1496C2
Thermal stability (℃) = +247.90 − 4.75A + 6.27B + 9.52C + 19.58AB − 10.17AC − 2.88BC + 26.11A2 − 12.76B2 + 18.90C2
where A, B, and C denote the concentration of SSNP, SBCF, and PLA in weight percentage.
ANOVA was used to validate the tightfitting model authenticity, as shown in Table 3 and Table 4. High F-values of 4.15 and 3.85 with a low p-value of 0.0369 and 0.0447 of water absorption and thermal stability exhibited by bioplastic films are presented in Table 3. Whereas the coefficient of determination (R2) values obtained for these two models were 0.8422 (water absorption) and 0.8318 (thermal stability), indicating that the models could account for up to 84.2% and 83.2% of the dissimilarities in the investigational output.

3.2. The Impact and Interaction Effects of Parameters on Water Absorption and Thermal Stability

Figure 3 and Figure 4 present the impact and interaction effects of additive concentration at different loading parameters on the developed bioplastic firms’ water absorption and thermal stability.

3.2.1. The Interaction Effect of PLA and SBCF on Bioplastic Water Absorption and Thermal Stability

The interaction impact between PLA and SBCF loading on water absorption and thermal stability is shown in Figure 3a and Figure 4c. A significantly lower water absorption of 1.2027% was observed with a concentration loading of 100 wt.% PLA and 0.5 wt.% SBCF, which was below the predicted value. However, with the addition of 0.5 wt.% SSNP, lower water absorption of 1.3711% (at a combination of 99.5 wt.% PLA, 0.5 wt.% SBCF, and 0.5 wt.% SSNP) above design point predicted values were obtained. These combinations were identified as optimum based on the actual concentration factor of 0.5 wt.% SBCF. Snail shell nanoparticles increase the interfacial bonding of SBCF and PLA, resulting in solid structures with better barrier properties against water permeability [36,37,38]. A similar inclination was observed in Figure 2c for thermal stability, where a combination of 99.5 wt.% PLA, and 0.5 wt.% SBCF offered maximum thermal stability of 263 °C, indicating the optimal concentration of PLA and SBCF for higher thermo-physical properties of bioplastic films. These results were consistent with other findings reported elsewhere, where the loading of SBCF was found to improve thermal stability [39,40]. This significant improvement in water absorption rate may be related to the oxidation of the solvent fabricating bioplastic films [41]. The presence of acetone catalyzes against the bioplastic water absorption rate, resulting in the observation of low water permeability.

3.2.2. The Interaction Effect of SBCF and SSNP on Bioplastic Water Absorption and Thermal Stability

Figure 3b and Figure 4a present the interaction effects of SBCF and SSNP, principal reinforcements on bioplastic films’ water absorption, and thermal stability. Significant low water absorption of 1.3711% was obtained after the combined 0.5 wt%. of SBCF and 0.5 wt% SSNP. This combination was acknowledged as optimal based on the concentration of 99.5% PLA. A notable interaction between SBCF and SSNP for thermal stability was observed at a combination of 1 wt%. SBCF and 1 wt%. SSNP exhibits superior thermal stability of 290.8 °C. This combination was identified as optimum based on the concentration of 99.5% PLA. The reinforcement effect of incorporating snail shell nanoparticles has been reported in previous studies, where the loading of SSNP positively improved the thermal stability of the developed bioplastic film [3,4]. This improved thermal stability may be attributed to inherent thermal properties and uniform dispersion of SSNP in the matrix of the films. Furthermore, this performance illustrated the reinforcement power of loading small nanoparticles. These two nanofillers are carbon-based, forming a synergistic effect, leading to catenation capability, increasing the chemical linkage into chains of atoms of the same element, and forming relatively strong bonds with itself and other components, resulting in better water resistance to permeability and improved thermal stability [3,42].

3.2.3. The Interaction Effect of PLA and SSNP on Bioplastic on Bioplastic Water Absorption and Thermal Stability

The interaction of PLA and SSNP on the bioplastic film’s water absorption and thermal stability are shown in Figure 3c and Figure 4b. Outstanding low water absorption of 1.3711% was observed for small loading of 0.5 wt% SSNP, similar to what was observed after PLA and SBCF were combined. This optimal concentration was recognized based on the concentration of 0.5% SBCF. A similar trend was observed for bioplastic film’s thermal stability, as superior thermal stability is achieved when 99.5 wt.% PLA and 0.5 wt.% SSNP were combined. This trend emphasized the effectiveness of incorporating small quantities of snail shells nanoparticles. This performance may be attributed to improved reinforcement properties of SSNP. The hydrophobic nature of the SSNP is another reason for the decreased water-absorption rate observed. The improvement in thermal stability may be attributed to SSNP’s inherent thermal properties and homogeneous dispersion in the composite bioplastic film.

3.3. Justification of Water Absorption and Thermal Stability of Snail Shell Nanoparticles and Sugar Bagasse Cellulose Fibers Reinforced Polylactic Acid Bioplastic Films

The optimum setpoints associated with the model presented in Table 5 include polylactic acid (99.815%), sugar bagasse cellulose fibers (0.036%), snail shell nanoparticles, and (0.634%). The optimized process conditions for bioplastic films based on the model predicted water absorption and thermal stability of 1.42% and 240.248 °C, as shown in Table 6. The water absorption and thermal stability of bioplastic film developed with optimized additive concentration according to the model prediction were investigated at the same process conditions. The experimental process was repeated thrice to validate the accuracy of values obtained from the software, and the mean of three samples was reported. Bioplastic films with optimized component concentration exhibited 0.45% water absorption and 259.07 °C thermal stability, as presented in Table 6.

3.4. Characterization

3.4.1. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry

The functional group of the developed bioplastic films with optimum loading of SSNP, SBCF, and PLA was investigated using a Fourier transform infrared spectrum, as shown in Figure 5. The investigation was conducted considering wavelengths within the 550–4000 cm−1 range with numerous peaks. The medium spectrum peak at 2926 cm−1 was associated with C-H stretching vibration, presenting the distinctive feature of cellulose nanocrystals. It is also associated with the aldehyde band in the materials [3,27]. A protuberant peak observed at 1748 cm−1 is ascribed to strong C=O stretching from the δ-lactone compound, 1652 cm−1 allied with the C=O stretching from the δ-lactone compound class, and the C−O vibration peak at 1183 cm−1 is linked to the incorporation of PLA segments [43,44].
The absorption peak 1592 cm−1 due to N–H (–NH2 bending) of amine characterizes the absorption frequencies of β-D-pyranoside in snail shells nanoparticles [44]. Furthermore, the peak at 1452 cm−1 belongs to C-O stretching, and the absorption peak at 1362 cm−1 is due to the O-H bending of a primary alcohol, which may be associated with the PLA. FT 1080 cm−1, 1043 cm−1, 916.92 cm−1, and 870 cm−1 belonging to strong C-H bending were associated with carbonate ions connected with the snail shell nanoparticles in the film [25]. FTIR spectra displayed a dominant interface between C-O stretching, C=O stretching, and C-H stretching bending in the carboxylic acids, suggesting a bioplastic film functional group.

3.4.2. Microstructure of Bioplastic Film

The developed bioplastic films with optimum loading of SSNP, SBCF, and PLA observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at 38,000× magnification to determine the fracture mechanism, as presented in Figure 6.
An interlocking texture of the SSNP, SBCF, and PLA was observed. Although SSNP is visible on the surface of the bioplastic film investigated under SEM, the SBCF was not that visible, even at 3800× magnification. This feature may be attributed to the lesser loading of SBCF. Furthermore, the uniform dispersal of filler SSNP and SBCF decisively fused within the matrix, providing a reasonably flat surface that could be the reason for the barrier to a water absorption rate. The improved thermal stability may be attributed to visible SSNP on the developed bioplastic films. A microscopic investigation was conducted using a transmission electron microscope (TEM) to support the structural formation claims of the developed bioplastic with optimum concentration.
Figure 7 shows the TEM micrograph of the bioplastic sample. A consistent dispersion of sugarcane bagasse cellulose fibers (SBCF) and snail shell nanoparticles (SSNP) polylactic acid matrix was observed. This texture evidences the compatibility of the reinforcement filler and fiber and the mixing technique’s effectiveness. A uniform dispersion of reinforcement filler and fiber was observed without any agglomeration, proving the significant influence of the mixing techniques on the degree of dispersion observed. This structural packing formation without agglomeration may be attributed to optimum component concentration, forming a structure that resists water permeability.
Furthermore, calcium carbonate possesses higher thermal properties, and dispersing it at lower concentrations has been reported to influence polylactic acid-based bioplastic positively [3,4,26]. Similarly, calcium carbonate is hydrophilic, and its incorporation into bioplastic resulted in a low water absorption rate. In addition, components of the developed bioplastic are carbon-based additives, and a combination of these materials often forms catenation, resulting in a robust structural formation that resists water absorbency. These materials often transfer atoms from one to another to improve the properties of the final composite. The nano snail shell nanoparticle (calcium carbonate) may have transferred its hydrophilic and inherent thermal properties after being dispersed in bioplastic, leading to the improved thermal stability and water absorption of the bioplastic with optimal concentration.

4. Conclusions

The fabrication process and additive concentration models of bioplastic films relating to the design effect of a combination of various loadings of Snail shell nanoparticles and sugar bagasse cellulose fibers’ water absorption and thermal stability were studied. Furthermore, the optimum concentration of Snail shell nanoparticles, sugar bagasse cellulose fibers, and polylactic acid for developing bioplastic with improved resistance to water uptake and enhanced thermal stability was designed and investigated using Box–Behnken experimental design. Three independent variables in the range of 99–100 wt.% for PLA, 01 wt.% for SBCF, and 0.5–1 wt.% for SSNP, were used with the water absorption and thermal stability selected as the dependent/response variables. The optimum setpoints associated with the model are polylactic acid (99.815%), sugar bagasse cellulose fibers (0.036%), and snail shell nanoparticles (0.634%). Bioplastic films with optimized component concentration exhibited 0.45% and 259.07 °C. Snail shell nanoparticles, sugar bagasse cellulose fibers, and polylactic acid loading positively influenced the predictable physio-thermal property setpoints. FTIR spectra displayed a dominant interface between C-O stretching, C=O stretching, and C-H stretching bending in the carboxylic acids, suggesting a bioplastic film functional group. SEM images reveal the homogeneous distribution of filler SSNP and SBCF firmly bonded within the matrix, resulting in a reasonably flat surface that may be described as a barrier for water absorption and improved thermal stability.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the review article. O.J.G. conceived, experimented, and analyzed the data study and developed the article’s first draft. L.Z.L. and N.D. reviewed, revised, and made relevant contributions. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was financial supported by the Durban University of Technology, South Africa.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interest that may negatively influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Chae, Y.; An, Y.-J. Current research trends on plastic pollution and ecological impacts on the soil ecosystem: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 240, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Akan, O.D.; Udofia, G.E.; Okeke, E.S.; Mgbechidinma, C.L.; Okoye, C.O.; Zoclanclounon, Y.A.B.; Atakpa, E.O.; Adebanjo, O.O. Plastic waste: Status, degradation and microbial management options for Africa. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 292, 112758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gbadeyan, O.J.; Fagbemi, O.D.; Andrew, J.; Adali, S.; Glen, B.; Sithole, B. Cellulose nanocrystals and snail shell-reinforced polyvinyl alcohol bioplastic films: Additive concentration optimization and mechanical properties assessment. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2022, 139, e52839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gbadeyan, O.J.; Linganiso, L.Z.; Deenadayalu, N. Thermomechanical characterization of bioplastic films produced using a combination of polylactic acid and bionano calcium carbonate. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 15538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Adeniran, A.A.; Shakantu, W. The Health and Environmental Impact of Plastic Waste Disposal in South African Townships: A Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Williams-Wynn, M.D.; Naidoo, P. A review of the treatment options for marine plastic waste in South Africa. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 161, 111785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Galafassi, S.; Nizzetto, L.; Volta, P. Plastic sources: A survey across scientific and grey literature for their inventory and relative contribution to microplastics pollution in natural environments, with an emphasis on surface water. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 693, 133499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lin, C.; Nakamura, S. Approaches to solving China’s marine plastic pollution and CO2 emission problems. Econ. Syst. Res. 2019, 31, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Mondal, M.; Bose, B.; Bansal, P. Recycling waste thermoplastic for energy efficient construction materials: An experimental investigation. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 240, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dauvergne, P. Why is the global governance of plastic failing the oceans? Glob. Environ. Chang. 2018, 51, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Brooks, A.L.; Wang, S.; Jambeck, J.R. The Chinese import ban and its impact on global plastic waste trade. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaat0131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Qin, M.; Chen, C.; Song, B.; Shen, M.; Cao, W.; Yang, H.; Zeng, G.; Gong, J. A review of biodegradable plastics to biodegradable microplastics: Another ecological threat to soil environments? J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 312, 127816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alpizar, F.; Carlsson, F.; Lanza, G.; Carney, B.; Daniels, R.; Jaime, M.; Ho, T.; Nie, Z.; Salazar, C.; Tibesigwa, B.; et al. A framework for selecting and designing policies to reduce marine plastic pollution in developing countries. Environ. Sci. Policy 2020, 109, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. López, O.V.; Castillo, L.A.; García, M.A.; Villar, M.A.; Barbosa, S.E. Food packaging bags based on thermoplastic corn starch reinforced with talc nanoparticles. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 43, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Marelli, B.; Patel, N.; Duggan, T.; Perotto, G.; Shirman, E.; Li, C.; Kaplan, D.L.; Omenetto, F.G. Programming function into mechanical forms by directed assembly of silk bulk materials. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 114, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Perotto, G.; Simonutti, R.; Ceseracciu, L.; Mauri, M.; Besghini, D.; Athanassiou, A. Water-induced plasticization in vegetable-based bioplastic films: A structural and thermo-mechanical study. Polymer 2020, 200, 122598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nan, N.; DeVallance, D.B.; Xie, X.; Wang, J. The effect of bio-carbon addition on the electrical, mechanical, and thermal properties of polyvinyl alcohol/biochar composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2016, 50, 1161–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Judawisastra, H.; Sitohang, R.D.R.; Marta, L. Mardiyati Water absorption and its effect on the tensile properties of tapioca starch/polyvinyl alcohol bioplastics. IOP Conf. Series: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 223, 012066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sa’Adah, S.M.; Saepudin, E. Effect of citric acid on physical and mechanical properties of Starch/PLA/PVA bioplastic films. AIP Conf. Proc. 2021, 2370, 060011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lim, R.; Kiew, P.L.; Lam, M.K.; Yeoh, W.M.; Ho, M.Y. Corn starch/PVA bioplastics—The properties and biodegradability study using Chlorella vulgaris cultivation. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 2021, 16, e2622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chong, T.Y.; Law, M.C.; Chan, Y.S. The Potentials of Corn Waste Lignocellulosic Fibre as an Improved Reinforced Bioplastic Composites. J. Polym. Environ. 2021, 29, 363–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nanda, M.R.; Misra, M.; Mohanty, A.K. Mechanical Performance of Soy-Hull-Reinforced Bioplastic Green Composites: A Comparison with Polypropylene Composites. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2012, 297, 184–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wahyuningtiyas, N.E.; Suryanto, H. Properties of Cassava Starch based Bioplastic Reinforced by Nanoclay. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2018, 2, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Agustin, M.B.; Ahmmad, B.; Alonzo, S.M.M.; Patriana, F.M. Bioplastic based on starch and cellulose nanocrystals from rice straw. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2014, 33, 2205–2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gbadeyan, O.; Adali, S.; Bright, G.; Sithole, B.; Awogbemi, O. Studies on the mechanical and absorption properties of achatina fulica snail and eggshells reinforced composite materials. Compos. Struct. 2020, 239, 112043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gbadeyan, O.J.; Adali, S.; Bright, G.; Sithole, B.; Onwubu, S. Optimization of Milling Procedures for Synthesizing Nano-CaCO3 from Achatina fulica Shell through Mechanochemical Techniques. J. Nanomater. 2020, 2020, 4370172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gbadeyan, O.; Adali, S.; Bright, G.; Sithole, B.; Lekha, P. Mechanical, microstructure, and dynamic mechanical analysis of nano-shell and plant fiber hybrid biocomposite. J. Compos. Mater. 2021, 55, 3345–3358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bessa, W.; Trache, D.; Derradji, M.; Tarchoun, A.F. Kevlar fabric reinforced polybenzoxazine composites filled with silane treated microcrystalline cellulose in the interlayers: The next generation of multi-layered armor panels. Def. Technol. 2021, 18, 2000–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Orts, W.J.; Imam, S.; Shey, J.; Glenn, G.M.; Inglesby, M.; Guttman, M.; Nguyen, A.; Revol, J.F. Effect of fiber source on cellulose reinforced polymer nanocomposites. In Proceedings of the Annual Technical Conference—ANTEC, Conference Proceedings, Chicago, IL, USA, 16–20 May 2004; Volume 2, pp. 2427–2431. [Google Scholar]
  30. Xie, F.; Bao, J.; Zhuo, L.; Zhao, Y.; Dang, W.; Si, L.; Yao, C.; Zhang, M.; Lu, Z. Toward high-performance nanofibrillated cellulose/aramid fibrid paper-based composites via polyethyleneimine-assisted decoration of silica nanoparticle onto aramid fibrid. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 245, 116610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lu, Z.; Ning, D.; Dang, W.; Wang, D.; Jia, F.; Li, J.; E, S. Comparative study on the mechanical and dielectric properties of aramid fibrid, mica and nanofibrillated cellulose based binary composites. Cellulose 2020, 27, 8027–8037. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mohit, H.; Selvan, V.A.M. Effect of a Novel Chemical Treatment on the Physico-Thermal Properties of Sugarcane Nanocellulose Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Nanocomposites. Int. Polym. Process. 2020, 35, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Greeves, N. Calcium Carbonate—CaCO3—Polymorphs. ChemTube3D. Available online: https://www.chemtube3d.com/ss-caco3/ (accessed on 8 February 2023).
  34. Alamy. Polylactic acid Stock Photos and Images. Available online: https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo/polylactic-acid.html?sortBy=relevant (accessed on 9 February 2023).
  35. Beyene, D.; Chae, M.; Dai, J.; Danumah, C.; Tosto, F.; Demesa, A.G.; Bressler, D.C. Characterization of Cellulase-Treated Fibers and Resulting Cellulose Nanocrystals Generated through Acid Hydrolysis. Materials 2018, 11, 1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Gbadeyan, O.J.; Adali, S.; Bright, G.; Sithole, B. Comparative Reinforcement Effect of Achatina fulica Snail Shell Nanoparticles, Montmorillonite, and Kaolinite Nanoclay on the Mechanical and Physical Properties of Greenpoxy Biocomposite. Polymers 2022, 14, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Gbadeyan, O.J.; Adali, S.; Bright, G.; Sithole, B. The investigation of reinforcement properties of nano-CaCO3 synthesized from Achatina fulica snail shell through mechanochemical methods on epoxy nanocomposites. Nanocomposites 2021, 7, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mohan, T.; Kanny, K. Thermal, mechanical and physical properties of nanoegg shell particle-filled epoxy nanocomposites. J. Compos. Mater. 2018, 52, 3989–4000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, Q.; Ji, C.; Sun, L.; Sun, J.; Liu, J. Cellulose Nanofibrils Filled Poly(Lactic Acid) Biocomposite Filament for FDM 3D Printing. Molecules 2020, 25, 2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lafia-Araga, R.A.; Sabo, R.; Nabinejad, O.; Matuana, L.; Stark, N. Influence of Lactic Acid Surface Modification of Cellulose Nanofibrils on the Properties of Cellulose Nanofibril Films and Cellulose Nanofibril–Poly(lactic acid) Composites. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fu, K.; Su, Y.; Yang, L.; Ji, N.; Song, C.; Ma, D.; Lv, X.; Han, R.; Liu, Q. Pt loaded manganese oxide nanoarray-based monolithic catalysts for catalytic oxidation of acetone. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 432, 134397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chung, Y.-L.; Olsson, J.V.; Li, R.J.; Frank, C.W.; Waymouth, R.M.; Billington, S.L.; Sattely, E.S. A Renewable Lignin–Lactide Copolymer and Application in Biobased Composites. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2013, 1, 1231–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, Y.; Mi, J.; Fu, H.; Zhou, H.; Wang, X. Nanocellular Foaming Behaviors of Chain-Extended Poly(lactic acid) Induced by Isothermal Crystallization. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 12512–12523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, W.; Xiao, Z.; Huang, C.; Zheng, K.; Luo, Y.; Dong, Y.; Shen, Z.; Li, W.; Qin, C. Preparation of Modified Chitosan Microsphere-Supported Copper Catalysts for the Borylation of α,β-Unsaturated Compounds. Polymers 2019, 11, 1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Image showing (A) calcium carbonate aragonite polymorph structures [33], (B) chemical structure of cellulose, and (C) polylactic acid [34].
Figure 1. Image showing (A) calcium carbonate aragonite polymorph structures [33], (B) chemical structure of cellulose, and (C) polylactic acid [34].
Polymers 15 01557 g001
Figure 2. Snail shell nanoparticles and sugar bagasse cellulose fibers reinforced polylactic acid bioplastic film.
Figure 2. Snail shell nanoparticles and sugar bagasse cellulose fibers reinforced polylactic acid bioplastic film.
Polymers 15 01557 g002
Figure 3. The 3-D surface plot of water absorption (WA) as a function of SSNP, SBCF, and PLA loadings: interaction effects of PLA and SBCF (A), SBCF and SSNP (B), PLA and SSNP (C).
Figure 3. The 3-D surface plot of water absorption (WA) as a function of SSNP, SBCF, and PLA loadings: interaction effects of PLA and SBCF (A), SBCF and SSNP (B), PLA and SSNP (C).
Polymers 15 01557 g003
Figure 4. The 3-D surface plot of thermal stability (TS) as a function of SSNP, SBCF, and PLA loadings: interaction effects of PLA and SBCF (A), SBCF and SSNP (B), PLA and SSNP (C).
Figure 4. The 3-D surface plot of thermal stability (TS) as a function of SSNP, SBCF, and PLA loadings: interaction effects of PLA and SBCF (A), SBCF and SSNP (B), PLA and SSNP (C).
Polymers 15 01557 g004
Figure 5. Graph showing the bioplastic film FTIR spectra.
Figure 5. Graph showing the bioplastic film FTIR spectra.
Polymers 15 01557 g005
Figure 6. SEM image of the developed bioplastic film.
Figure 6. SEM image of the developed bioplastic film.
Polymers 15 01557 g006
Figure 7. TEM micrograph showing the dispersion of sugarcane bagasse cellulose fibers and snail shell nanoparticles reinforced polylactic acid bioplastic.
Figure 7. TEM micrograph showing the dispersion of sugarcane bagasse cellulose fibers and snail shell nanoparticles reinforced polylactic acid bioplastic.
Polymers 15 01557 g007
Table 1. Investigational runs designed for bioplastic films using the Box-Behnken method.
Table 1. Investigational runs designed for bioplastic films using the Box-Behnken method.
RunFactor 1
A (SSNP)
%
Factor 2
B (SBCF)
%
Factor 3
C (PLA)
%
10.50100
20.50.599.5
300.5100
41199.5
50.5099
60.5199
700.599
80.51100
90099.5
1010.5100
110.50.599.5
121099.5
130199.5
140.50.599.5
150.50.599.5
160.50.599.5
1710.599
Table 2. Box-Benken experimental design responses for bioplastic films.
Table 2. Box-Benken experimental design responses for bioplastic films.
Response 1
(WA) %
Response 2
(TS) °C
1.2027251
1.0693245
1.494335
2.9277290.833
2.0166241.333
3.444262.833
1.7278280.5
0.532261
1.5867270.833
1.1093285
1.5981251.5
1.934242.333
2.7894241
1.2452238.667
1.4921241.333
1.3711263
1.9356271.167
Table 3. ANOVA for water absorption and thermal stability of bioplastic films.
Table 3. ANOVA for water absorption and thermal stability of bioplastic films.
SourceSum of SquaresdFMean SquaresF-Valuep-ValuesR2
Water absorption (model)7.3490.81504.150.03690.8422
Thermal stability (model)8254.069917.123.850.04470.8318
Where: R2: coefficient of determination, F-value: Fisher-snedecor distribution value, df: degree of freedom, and p-value: probability value.
Table 4. Coefficients of estimates with standard errors for the model.
Table 4. Coefficients of estimates with standard errors for the model.
FactorWater Absorption CEWater Absorption SEThermal Stability CEThermal Stability SE
Intercept1.360.1981247.906.91
A-SSNP0.03860.1566−4.755.46
B-SBCF0.36910.15666.275.46
C-PLA−0.59830.15669.525.46
AB−0.05230.221519.587.72
AC−0.14810.2215−10.177.72
BC−0.52450.2215−2.887.72
0.36110.215926.117.53
0.59320.2159−12.767.53
−0.14960.215918.907.53
Table 5. Optimum loading variables for water absorption and thermal stability of bioplastic films.
Table 5. Optimum loading variables for water absorption and thermal stability of bioplastic films.
Independent VariablesPredicted Optimum Levels (%)
Polylactic acid99.815
Sugar bagasse cellulose fibers0.036
Snail shell nanoparticle0.634
Table 6. Predicted and observed values for water absorption and thermal stability of bioplastic films.
Table 6. Predicted and observed values for water absorption and thermal stability of bioplastic films.
ResponsesPredicted ValuesObserved Values
Water absorption % (model)1.420.45
Thermal stability °C (model)240.248259.07
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gbadeyan, O.J.; Linganiso, L.Z.; Deenadayalu, N. Assessment and Optimization of Thermal Stability and Water Absorption of Loading Snail Shell Nanoparticles and Sugarcane Bagasse Cellulose Fibers on Polylactic Acid Bioplastic Films. Polymers 2023, 15, 1557. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15061557

AMA Style

Gbadeyan OJ, Linganiso LZ, Deenadayalu N. Assessment and Optimization of Thermal Stability and Water Absorption of Loading Snail Shell Nanoparticles and Sugarcane Bagasse Cellulose Fibers on Polylactic Acid Bioplastic Films. Polymers. 2023; 15(6):1557. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15061557

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gbadeyan, Oluwatoyin J., Linda Z. Linganiso, and Nirmala Deenadayalu. 2023. "Assessment and Optimization of Thermal Stability and Water Absorption of Loading Snail Shell Nanoparticles and Sugarcane Bagasse Cellulose Fibers on Polylactic Acid Bioplastic Films" Polymers 15, no. 6: 1557. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15061557

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop