Next Article in Journal
Latest Advancements in the Development of High-Performance Lignin- and Tannin-Based Non-Isocyanate Polyurethane Adhesive for Wood Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Reliability Analysis of HHV Prediction Models for Organic Materials Using Bond Dissociation Energies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Use of Yarn and Carded Jute as Epoxy Matrix Reinforcement for the Production of Composite Materials for Application in the Wind Sector: A Preliminary Analysis for the Manufacture of Blades for Low-Intensity Winds
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 15
Issue 19
10.3390/polym15193863
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Babassu Coconut Fibers: Investigation of Chemical and Surface Properties (Attalea speciosa.)

by
Yago Soares Chaves
1,*,
Pedro Henrique Poubel Mendonça da Silveira
2,
Sergio Neves Monteiro
1 and
Lucio Fabio Cassiano Nascimento
1
1
Department of Materials Science, Military Institute of Engineering-IME, Praça General Tíburcio, 80, Urca, Rio de Janeiro 222290-270, RJ, Brazil
2
West Zone Campus, Rio de Janeiro State University–UERJ, Avenida Manuel Caldeira de Alvarenga, 1203, Campo Grande, Rio de Janeiro 23070-200, RJ, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(19), 3863; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15193863
Submission received: 22 July 2023 / Revised: 9 September 2023 / Accepted: 15 September 2023 / Published: 23 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Preparation and Applications of Lignocellulosic Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
To complement previous results, an analysis of the chemical and morphological properties of babassu fibers (Attalea speciosa Mart. ex Spreng.) was conducted in order to evaluate their potential as reinforcements in the production of composites with epoxy matrix. The diameter distribution was analyzed in a sample of one hundred fibers, allowing the verification of its variation. The determination of the chemical properties involved experimental analyses of the constituent index and X-ray diffraction. The diffractogram was used to calculate the crystallinity index and the microfibril angle, which are crucial parameters that indicate the consistency of the mechanical properties of babassu fibers and the feasibility of their use in composites. The results revealed that babassu fiber has a chemical composition, with contents of 28.53% lignin, 32.34% hemicellulose, and 37.97% cellulose. In addition, it showed a high crystallinity index of 81.06% and a microfibril angle of 7.67°. These characteristics, together with previous results, indicate that babassu fibers have favorable chemical and morphological properties to be used as reinforcements in composites, highlighting its potential as an important material for applications in technology areas.

1. Introduction

Seeking to contribute to sustainable development and meet economic demands, researchers are investigating alternative materials as substitutes for traditional ones in polymeric composites. Among the various materials under scrutiny, composites reinforced with natural fibers have garnered attention for their exceptional ballistic properties and favorable performance across multiple applications [1,2,3,4].
Composites reinforced with natural fibers have sparked considerable interest in both the scientific community and industry. This interest primarily stems from the advantages they offer over traditional composites, such as reduced weight, enhanced mechanical strength, diminished environmental impact, and lower cost [5,6,7].
Brazil possesses the potential to develop materials utilizing natural fibers abundantly available within its territory, including jute, sisal, coconut, and buriti among others. These fibers serve as reinforcements for polymeric matrices, imparting excellent mechanical properties suitable for applications in sectors like construction, automotive, and aerospace. By promoting the use of these reinforced composites, local economies can flourish while also contributing to sustainability by reducing reliance on non-renewable resources. Investments in research in this field are crucial for exploring the potential of these materials, fostering sustainable development, and driving technological innovation [4,8,9,10].
Lignocellulosic natural fibers possess heterogeneous characteristics with varying mechanical properties among the fibers. The growth process of these fibers is regulated by the metabolism of plant cells. Several factors influence their growth, including soil composition, water availability, light exposure, and genetic variation [11]. Reducing the fiber diameter tends to enhance the mechanical properties as it reduces internal defects, resulting in finer fibers with improved mechanical properties [12,13].
The fibers obtained from the fruit of the babassu palm, illustrated in Figure 1a, belong to the Arecaceae family, specifically the Attalea genus. In Brazil, the original species is scientifically known as Attalea speciosa. This palm tree is native to a biome called the coconut palm forest, which spans from the Amazon to the caatinga regions, with a greater presence in the states of Maranhão and Piauí [14,15]. The babassu palm can grow up to 20 m tall, and its fruits contain edible oil seeds, as per the illustration in Figure 1b. Each palm tree typically produces an average of 150 to 250 coconuts per bunch, with four bunches per palm. The fruits have an ellipsoidal shape, measuring 8 to 15 cm in length and 5 to 7 cm in diameter [16].
Babassu exhibits various applications, as exemplified by the study conducted by Silva Lima et al. [17], which explored the production of activated carbon as an advanced sustainable carbon material. Bauer et al. [18] examined the physical and chemical characteristics of babassu oil for its potential use in the pharmaceutical and biofuel industries. Zanine et al. [19] proposed a straightforward solution for feeding dairy cows by analyzing certain chemical properties. Moura et al. [20] demonstrated the production of thermoplastic starch composites derived from starch and babassu fibers. Despite these diverse applications, babassu fiber remains relatively underexplored as a material for engineering purposes.
In a recent article [21], the preliminary results on babassu fibers were investigated for their potential engineering applications as reinforcements for polymer matrix composites. Table 1 illustrates the previous results obtained on the mechanical properties and density of babassu fibers with different diameters.
The article [21] not only explored the thermal properties of babassu fibers but also began a comprehensive chemical investigation. The study focused particularly on the degradation of the fiber in response to increasing temperature as well as on the analysis of the functional groups intrinsic to the fiber structure. Figure 2 shows the graphs resulting from the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetry (TGA) analyses, while Figure 3 illustrates the spectrum obtained using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR).
According to the article [21], the degradation of babassu fiber, as observed in the TGA graphs, can be divided into different stages. The first stage of degradation begins at a temperature of 37.8 °C and extends to 200 °C, resulting in a 13.6% reduction in the mass of the babassu fiber. The starting temperature for the thermal degradation of babassu fiber is 251.1 °C. The second stage of degradation occurs between 200 °C and 382 °C and is characterized by the greatest loss of mass, with 69.9% of the total mass of babassu fiber lost at a maximum temperature of 346.2 °C. The third, and final, stage of babassu fiber degradation begins at 382 °C and continues up to 564 °C, culminating in the complete degradation of the fiber.
The DTG curves show the peaks referring to the degradation temperatures of the babassu fiber, with the degradation process of the babassu fibers initially occurring at 37.8 °C. The second peak was observed at 287.8 °C, followed by the third peak at 346.2 °C. The last degradation peak, present in the third stage of fiber degradation, is located at 557.5 °C. This peak indicates the final degradation of the babassu fiber and its complete transformation into ash after the test.
In the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis graph, we can identify several thermal transitions. Firstly, we observe an endothermic peak at 67.8 °C, indicating the evaporation of water from the fiber. Next, we identified three distinct exothermic peaks at temperatures of 132.1, 406, and 478.5 °C. The peak at 132.1 °C is probably associated with the decomposition of lignin and part of the degradation of cellulose I. The peak at 406 °C is related to the degradation of hemicellulose components and the decomposition of α-cellulose. Finally, the third peak at 478.5 °C corresponds to the final degradation of lignin and cellulose.
In the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectrum, we observed several significant bands. The most prominent band occurs at 3286 cm−1 and is interpreted as a stretch in the (OH) bond. The adjacent band at 2919 cm−1 is associated with the characteristics of the macromolecules that make up the fiber. The band located at 1613 cm−1 can be attributed to the functional groups belonging to hemicellulose. The band at 1317 cm−1 is related to the oscillatory vibration of the CH2 bond. The band appearing at 1033 cm−1 is commonly found in non-lignified fibers (NLFs) and is associated with cellulose groups and some carbohydrates. Finally, the band at 770 cm−1 is correlated with vibrations of esters and aromatic rings.
Those previous results illustrated in Table 1 and in Figure 2 and Figure 3 indicate a preliminary, possible potential of babassu fibers as reinforcements for polymer composites for technological applications. However, additional results are needed to consolidate this potential for composite reinforcement.
Given the limited information available on babassu fiber, our present study aims to complement the previous results [21] and investigate its chemical and morphological properties through constituent index tests and X-ray diffraction analysis. Additionally, morphological analyses using scanning electron microscopy were conducted.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The babassu fibers used in this study were obtained in Santana do Maranhão, a city located in the state of Maranhão, Brazil. The process of extracting the fibers from the shell of the babassu coconut involved several steps. First, the shell was broken and exposed to sunlight for two days to facilitate the removal of the fibers. Subsequently, the shell was immersed in water for 14 days to increase the defibrillation of the fibers. After the period of immersion in water, the fibers were removed and showed greater malleability. While the larger diameter fibers could be easily removed, the finer ones required the use of tools such as knives and tweezers, with the necessary precaution to avoid damaging the integrity of the fiber during this process. The comprehensive stages of the babassu fiber extraction process are outlined in detail in the flowchart shown in Figure 4.

2.2. Characterization

2.2.1. Diameter Measurement

During the analysis, a significant variation in the diameter of each babassu fiber was observed, necessitating the utilization of the diameter averaging method. The initial step in characterizing the babassu fibers involved evaluating their diameter variation. One hundred fibers were selected for analysis using light microscopy. The equipment employed for the analysis of diametral variation was an optical microscope equipped with a built-in digital camera (Olympus—BX53M, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan). The microscope was configured to a 5× amplitude and operated in dark field mode.
The one hundred fibers were measured at three distinct points along their length. At each point, six readings were taken, consisting of three measurements at 0° and three at 90°, resulting in a total of 18 data collection points along the fiber’s length. Optical microscopy played a crucial role in determining the cross-section geometry of the fibers. For each babassu fiber, the average observations at 0° and 90° were considered as the major and minor diameters of the ellipse [22,23,24].

2.2.2. Moisture Content

To determine the moisture content of babassu fiber, a sample weighing approximately 2.0 g should be carefully measured and placed in a designated container. The sample, along with the container, is then placed in an oven set at a controlled temperature of 105 ± 2 °C for 3 h. This process should be repeated until a consistent mass is obtained, indicating no further variation in moisture content. The moisture content is calculated using Equation (1), as outlined in previous studies [25,26,27].
M C % = ( M W S A − M D S A ) M W S × 100 %
where: (MWS) is wet sample mass, (MWSA) is mass of the container/wet sample set, (MDSA) is mass of the container/dry sample set, and (MC) is moisture content.

2.2.3. Determination of Chemical Composition

Determination of the Extractive Content

The determination of the extractable content of babassu fiber was performed using the Soxhlet extraction method. Before starting the procedure, it was ensured that the equipment used was properly cleaned and free from grease. A cartridge containing approximately 4000 g of dry matter from the plant was prepared and inserted into the equipment.
Next, a toluene/ethanol mixture in a 1:1 (v/v) ratio was added to a 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask. The system was refluxed for a period of four to five hours, with a minimum of 24 reflux cycles.
After the extraction time was completed, the solvent used was recovered using a rotary evaporator. The resulting extract was transferred to a pre-cleaned and dried Petri dish, avoiding possible losses (small volumes of fresh solvent were used if necessary). The dish was then placed in an oven at 105 ± 2 °C for 1 h and subsequently cooled in a desiccator. After cooling, the dish was weighed.
This process of heating and weighing was repeated for 30 min until a constant mass was obtained. Equation (2) was used to determine the extractable content [25,26].
E C % = ( M S R S − M E S ) M S × 100 %
where (MS) is sample mass, (MES) is mass of the plate/extractives set, (MSRS) is mass of the plate/solvent residue set, and (EC%) is extractives content in percent.

Determination of Ash Content

To determine the ash percentage, the following steps were followed. Firstly, 2.0 g of dry babassu fiber were carefully weighed and placed into a pre-calcined crucible, which was heated to 600 °C for 30 min. The crucible containing the fiber was then transferred to a muffle furnace at room temperature. Inside the muffle furnace, a heating ramp of 9.6 °C per minute was applied, gradually increasing the temperature until it reached the target working temperature of 600 °C within 1 h. This temperature was maintained for a duration of three hours to ensure complete combustion of the fiber. Following the three-hour period, the temperature of the furnace was gradually lowered to 200 °C and held constant for one hour. At this point, the crucible sample set was carefully removed from the furnace and placed in a desiccator to cool down and prevent moisture absorption.
A S C % = ( M C S − M C ) M S × 100 %
where: (MS) is mass of the sample, (MC) is mass of the container, (MCS) is mass of the calcined set, and (ASC%) is ash content in percent.

Determination of Lignin Content

Lignin determination requires the use of approximately 1.0 g of finely ground sample, which should be devoid of moisture and extractives. The babassu sample should be carefully placed in a grate and mixed with at least 300 mL of 72% (w/w) sulfuric acid, which has been cooled to a temperature of 10 to 15 °C prior to usage. The mixture should be vigorously stirred with a pestle for 15 min until all visible particles are dissolved. Then, the solution should be transferred to a beaker and allowed to sit undisturbed for 24 h.
Following the previous steps, 306 mL of distilled water was added to the Becker flask to dilute the sulfuric acid concentration to 4%. The content was quantitatively transferred to a 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask and placed on a hot plate. A condenser was connected to the flask and initiated reflux, maintaining the material under reflux for a duration of 4 h.
After completing the aforementioned procedures, a filtration system was set up using a 1000 mL kitassat and a vacuum pump. The precipitate was collected in a funnel and washed until its pH is similar to that of the water used. Subsequently, the funnel was placed in an oven set at 105 ± 2 °C for a period of three hours, allowing it to dry until a constant weight is achieved. Finally, the combined weight of the funnel and the lignin was measured using a highly accurate analytical balance with a precision of 0.0001 g. Equation (4) provides the formulation for determining the lignin content [25,26,28,29,30,31].
L C % = ( M F L − M F ) M S × 100 %
where: (MF) is mass of the clean and dry funnel, (MS) is on mass of the sample, (MFL) is mass of the funnel added to the mass of lignin, after oven drying, and (LC%) is lignin content.

Determination of Holocellulose Content

Dried babassu fibers, free from extractives, were subjected to extraction using a 24% potassium hydroxide solution. The fibers were covered with the solution, and the extraction process was carried out at room temperature for a duration of 24 h [25,26,29,30,31].
To proceed further, the mass of the sintered glass funnel should be accurately measured. Subsequently, the funnel was placed on top of a 1000 mL kitassat and connected to a vacuum pump. The contents of the flask were transferred to the funnel, and the precipitate was washed with distilled water until it reached a neutral pH. Afterward, the funnel was positioned in an oven at 105 ± 2 °C and allowed to dry for a minimum of 18 h until a constant weight is achieved. The formulation for determining the holocellulose contents can be found in Equation (5).
H C % = ( M F H − M F ) M S × 100 %
where: (MF) is mass of the clean and dry funnel, (MS) is mass of the sample, (MFH) is mass of the funnel added to the mass of holocellulose, and (HC%) is holocellulose content.

Determination of the Alphacellulose Content

The dried holocellulose from the previous test was used, weighed to about 1.0 g, and placed in a crucible of at least 100 mL. A total of 15 mL of a 17.5% sodium hydroxide solution was added, with a wait of two minutes of contact between the solution and the cellulose, and then the material was ground for eight minutes. Then, 40 mL of distilled water was added to the mortar, and the contents were quantitatively transferred to the funnel. The precipitate collected in the funnel should be rinsed until the filtrate has a neutral pH. The funnel should then be dried at 105 ± 2 °C (>18 h), placed in the desiccator, and weighed to constant weight (mass of alphacellulose). Equation (6) shows the method for determining the alphacellulose content [25,26,29,30,31].
A C % = ( M F H − M F ) M S × 100 %
where: (MF) is mass of the clean and dry funnel, (MHS) is mass of the holocellulose sample, (MFA) is mass of the funnel added to the mass of alphacellulose, and (AC%) is alphacellulose content.

2.3. X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

To perform the XRD analysis, the babassu fibers were dried in an oven at 75 °C for 24 h. The fibers were cut to a width of 60 mm and mounted in parallel on a monocrystalline silicon substrate, as shown in Figure 5 [32]. The analysis was performed using the Xpert Pro MRD System equipment from Malvern PANalytics (Malvern, UK) with Cobalt Kα radiation (1.789 A), with a scan speed of 4°/min, a power of 40 mA × 40 kV, and scanning from 10° to 60°. An XRD analysis can obtain the diffraction profile of the babassu fiber in natura and thus determine parameters such as the crystallinity index (CI) and microfibril angle (MFA) [33,34].

2.3.1. Crystallinity Index

The method proposed by Segal et al. [35] was used to calculate the crystallinity index (Ic). The value is found from the relationship that uses the intensity of the peak (002) that is considered the crystalline peak and the intensity of the amorphous part (001), according to Equation (7) [35,36,37,38].
C I % = ( I 002 − I 001 ) I 002 × 100 %
where (CI) is crystallinity index, I002 is peak referring to the crystalline part, and I001 is peak referring to the amorphous part.

2.3.2. Microfibril Angle

The microfibril angle (MFA) value was obtained through a series of derivations of the Gauss curve referring to the crystalline plane of the peak (002). To obtain the Gaussian curve, the Origin Pro software version 2023b was used, using some steps to determine the T value. To obtain it, it is necessary to remove the baseline from the diffractogram, and thus, it is possible to determine the Gaussian of the 002 plane [39,40]. The T value is called the angle between the line from the center of the Gaussian peak to the intersection point between the first derivative and the second derivative. To obtain it, it is necessary to use Equation (8):
M F A = − 12.198 T 3 + 113.67 T 2 − 348.4 T + 358.09

2.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The morphological surface characterization of babassu fibers was performed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The model used was a Quanta FEG 250 Fei equipped with a secondary electron detector, operating at an acclimation voltage of 10 kV. To be able to obtain the SEM images of the babassu fiber, the fibers were coated with gold using a Leica ACE600 sputtering machine [41,42,43].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Diameter Variation

The FNLs have some disadvantages, such as their heterogeneity. These characteristics also apply to the diameter, which varies considerably along its length. Additionally, babassu fibers also exhibit significant differences in diameters when comparing different samples [21,22,23]. To analyze this aspect, the frequency distribution method was used to analyze the diameter of 100 babassu fibers, with the aid of an optical instrument. Figure 6 illustrates the optical microscopy of a babassu fiber, revealing a marked heterogeneity throughout its development.
In Figure 4, it is possible to observe the variation of the fiber diameter along its length. This difference in diameter can be explained by the significant variation in the length of the babassu fiber, which sets it apart from other fibers. Several factors can influence this diametral variation, such as the extraction of the fibers from the babassu coconut, fiber drying, water immersion, and equipment handling during analysis [44,45]. The results obtained from the analysis of the diametral variation of the babassu fiber in relation to the diameter are presented in Figure 7.
The structures were discovered within the range of average (0.132 mm) to maximum (0.470 mm) values. The third highest number of fibers was observed within the range of 0.19 mm to 0.252 mm, with a total count of 21 fibers. On the other hand, the lowest distribution frequency was found within the range of 0.132 mm to 0.153 mm, comprising only four fibers. Notably, the fibers with the largest diameter were located in the second range, exhibiting a considerable number of diameters measuring 0.472 mm. However, it is important to note that this lower frequency is attributed to difficulties encountered in unwinding thicker fibers. These challenges arise due to the larger internal tasks involved and the tendency for such fibers to break more easily during the process. Overall, the frequency distribution values suggest an average fiber diameter of 0.27 mm.

3.2. Determination of Chemical Composition

The moisture content and chemical composition values for the babassu fibers are shown in Table 2.
The organization of lignocellulosic fibers, comprising cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, within the fiber structure is a complex process. An accurate understanding of the composition and arrangement of these components is crucial for effectively utilizing natural fibers in the production of polymer matrix composites.
In this study, the moisture content of babassu fibers was compared with data presented by other researchers, as observed in Table 1. The observed value closely aligns with moisture levels reported for other NLFs. This variation can be attributed to several factors that directly influence the properties of NLFs, such as cultivation site, plant age, and storage conditions [53]. The low moisture content of babassu fiber makes it suitable for application in polymeric matrices for composite production. The hydrophilic nature of fibers with lower moisture content reduces the percentage of water inside the hydrophobic matrix, facilitating a more efficient interaction between the materials [54].
Among the NLFs studied, the babassu fiber exhibits a higher content of extractives, particularly waxes, which may be associated with the presence of waxy dust in the analyzed fiber. Waxy substances in natural fibers generally influence wettability and adhesion properties [55]. As for ash content, the babassu fiber presents a value similar to the other fibers listed. A higher lignin content was observed in the fiber samples analyzed (28.53%), compared to the other data presented. The lignin content in fibers plays a key role in the structure, properties and morphology. Lignin plays the role of an amorphous binder between the fibrils, promoting the connection between cellulose and hemicellulose. It is present in all layers of the fiber cell wall, with higher concentration in the primary and secondary layers [55,56].
The concentration of hemicellulose found in the present research (32.34%) was higher than the other analyzed fibers, which indicates an excellent elasticity property of babassu fiber. Besides being water soluble, the presence of hemicellulose also plays an important role by preventing direct contact between microfibrils [57].
The cellulose content found in babassu fiber was 37.97%, showing to be lower than some other fibers mentioned. However, the cellulose parameter in the fiber still indicates good mechanical properties, since cellulose plays a crucial role in the cell wall strength of plant cells. Therefore, it is directly related to the mechanical performance of fibers [10,58].

3.3. XRD Results

Figure 8 presents the diffractogram of babassu fiber, displaying two prominent peaks: one amorphous and one crystalline. These peaks correspond to the planes (101) and (002), with angles of 19.26° and 25.37°, respectively. The (101) peak is attributed to non-cellulosic components like hemicellulose and lignin, while the (002) peak is associated with the crystalline and cellulosic constituent of the natural fiber [59,60,61]. The intensity of the (002) peak is directly linked to the cellulose content, indicating that a higher cellulose content results in a more intense peak [62].
Based on the intensities observed for the (101) and (002) planes, Equation (7) can be applied. The calculated crystallinity index of the babassu fiber was determined to be 81.06%. This value is superior when compared with the value obtained in the work of Rodrigues et al. [63] for babassu. On the other hand, Maniglia et al. [64] obtained a lower value compared to the findings of the current study. Several factors, including cultivation location, plant age, and soil properties, can directly influence the crystallinity value [53].
To determine the microfibril angle (MFA), the diffractogram of babassu fiber in its natural state was utilized, specifically focusing on the (200) plane corresponding to the crystalline structure of the fiber. By employing Origin Pro 2023b Software and incorporating the crystallographic file 00-056-1718, the MFA of babassu fiber was calculated [65]. Upon examination of Figure 6, it is evident that the peak associated with the (002) plane exhibits higher intensity, signifying the characteristic of the crystalline phase (cellulose) and serving as a reference for MFA determination [35,65]. Figure 9 illustrates the methodology employed to derive the T value.
By utilizing the T value obtained from the intersection of the Gaussian curve, the first and second derivatives in Equation (8) yielded a value of 7.64° [66]. This value was found to be lower than that reported for eucalyptus by Hein et al. [67]. However, the value obtained for the guaruman fiber by Reis et al. [65] was similar to the results obtained, as depicted in Table 3.

3.4. Microstructural Analysis

SEM images of the babassu fibers are shown in Figure 10.
The SEM image indicates the presence of massive surface porosity and some depression points on the surface of the babassu fiber, which are characteristics found in other natural fibers [68,69]. The existing features in the micrograph of the fiber surface indicate that good adhesion is possible when applied as reinforcements in a polymer matrix composite. At 4000× magnification, at a point of depression, it is possible to observe the presence of roughness and depression, a characteristic that indicates a good anchorage point. This is indicative of the good mechanical properties of babassu fibers [69].

4. Conclusions

The analysis of babassu fiber properties reveals promising characteristics, especially in terms of mechanical properties and crystallinity indicators. SEM micrographs demonstrate considerable surface porosity, along with roughness and depression points. These characteristics contribute to good adhesion when the fibers are used as reinforcements in polymer matrix composites. When evaluating the diameter of the fibers, an average of 0.2 mm was obtained, with a range between 0.132 and 0.40 mm. The chemical analysis of the fiber revealed satisfactory parameters for its main constituents, with lignin contents of 28.53%, hemicellulose of 32.34%, and cellulose of 37.97%. These values are higher than those found in some other fibers studied. The diffractogram of the babassu fiber exhibited a pattern characteristic of natural lignocellulosic fibers, while the crystallinity index reached 81.06%, an extremely high value compared to other fibers. In addition, the microfibrillar angle was determined to be 7.64°, indicating good mechanical properties of the fiber.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.S.C., L.F.C.N. and S.N.M.; methodology, Y.S.C. and P.H.P.M.d.S.; validation, L.F.C.N. and S.N.M.; formal analysis. Y.S.C. and P.H.P.M.d.S.; investigation, Y.S.C.; writing—original draft paper, Y.S.C.; writing—review and editing, P.H.P.M.d.S.; supervision, L.F.C.N. and S.N.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Brazilian government research agencies CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) and CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Faruk, O.; Bledzki, A.K.; Fink, H.-P.; Sain, M. Biocomposites Reinforced with Natural Fibers: 2000–2010. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 1552–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Monteiro, S.N.; Louro, L.H.L.; Trindade, W.; Elias, C.N.; Ferreira, C.L.; de Sousa Lima, E.; Weber, R.P.; Miguez Suarez, J.C.; da Silva Figueiredo, A.B.-H.; Pinheiro, W.A.; et al. Natural Curaua Fiber-Reinforced Composites in Multilayered Ballistic Armor. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2015, 46, 4567–4577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wambua, P.; Vangrimde, B.; Lomov, S.; Verpoest, I. The Response of Natural Fibre Composites to Ballistic Impact by Fragment Simulating Projectiles. Compos. Struct. 2007, 77, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Da Luz, F.S.; Lima Junior, E.P.; Louro, L.H.L.; Monteiro, S.N. Ballistic Test of Multilayered Armor with Intermediate Epoxy Composite Reinforced with Jute Fabric. Mater. Res. 2015, 18, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dong, C. Review of Natural Fibre-Reinforced Hybrid Composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2018, 37, 331–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, Q.; Shi, L.; Nie, J.; Wang, H.; Yang, D. Study on Poly(Lactic Acid)/Natural Fibers Composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012, 125, E526–E533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fuqua, M.A.; Huo, S.; Ulven, C.A. Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites. Polym. Rev. 2012, 52, 259–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rohen, L.A.; Margem, F.M.; Monteiro, S.N.; Vieira, C.M.F.; Madeira de Araujo, B.; Lima, E.S. Ballistic Efficiency of an Individual Epoxy Composite Reinforced with Sisal Fibers in Multilayered Armor. Mater. Res. 2015, 18, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Martinelli, F.R.B.; Ribeiro, F.R.C.; Marvila, M.T.; Monteiro, S.N.; da Filho, F.C.G.; de Azevedo, A.R.G. A Review of the Use of Coconut Fiber in Cement Composites. Polymers 2023, 15, 1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Da Demosthenes, L.C.C.; Nascimento, L.F.C.; Monteiro, S.N.; Costa, U.O.; da Garcia Filho, F.C.; da Luz, F.S.; Oliveira, M.S.; Ramos, F.J.H.T.V.; Pereira, A.C.; Braga, F.O. Thermal and Structural Characterization of Buriti Fibers and Their Relevance in Fabric Reinforced Composites. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Elanchezhian, C.; Ramnath, B.V.; Ramakrishnan, G.; Rajendrakumar, M.; Naveenkumar, V.; Saravanakumar, M.K. Review on Mechanical Properties of Natural Fiber Composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 1785–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hibi, M.; Abe, N.; Haba, M.; Tanaka, T.; Murata, H.; Oyama, M. Phytochemical Investigation of Cyperus malaccensis subsp. Monophyllus. Planta Med. 2019, 85, 1499–1500. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jha, K.; Kataria, R.; Verma, J.; Pradhan, S. Potential Biodegradable Matrices and Fiber Treatment for Green Composites: A Review. AIMS Mater. Sci. 2019, 6, 119–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pires, P.S.; de Borges, M.S.; Leal, J.E.C.; Pedroza, M.M.; Silva, F.L.d.N.; Grácio, H.R.; Rambo, M.C.D.; Rambo, M.K.D. Socioeconomic Analysis of Bioproducts Derived from Babassu Nut Breakers Pyrolysis in Legal Amazonia Communities. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 43, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Porro, R.; de Sousa, R.C. Anatomy of Babassu-Nut Value Chain for Policy Guidance in Support of Traditional Agroextractive Communities in the Mearim Valley, Maranhão, Brazil. Rev. Econ. E Sociol. Rural. 2023, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lorenzine, H. Palmeiras no Brasil; Plantarum; Nova Odessa: São Paulo, Brazil, 1996; p. 70. [Google Scholar]
  17. Da Silva Lima, P.N.; Ghosh, A.; Nascimento, A.; Sousa Vieira, L.H.; Costa, R.S.; Ferreira, O.P.; Abreu, G.J.P.; Fujisawa, K.; Silva-Filho, E.C.; Gomes de Souza Filho, A.; et al. Advanced Sustainable Carbon Material from Babassu Biomass and Its Adsorption Performance. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2023, 176, 111188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bauer, L.C.; Santos, L.S.; Sampaio, K.A.; Ferrão, S.P.B.; da Fontan, R.C.I.; Minim, L.A.; Veloso, C.M.; Bonomo, R.C.F. Physicochemical and Thermal Characterization of Babassu Oils (Orbignya phalerata Mart.) Obtained by Different Extraction Methods. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zanine, A.; De Sá, C.; Ferreira, D.; Parente, H.; Parente, M.; Santos, E.M.; Rodrigues, R.; Santos, F.N.; Lima, A.G.; Cunha, I.A.; et al. The Effect of Babassu Industry By-Products as an Alternative Feed for Dairy Cows. Agronomy 2023, 13, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. De Moura, C.V.R.; da Sousa, D.C.; de Moura, E.M.; de Araújo, E.C.E.; Sittolin, I.M. New Biodegradable Composites from Starch and Fibers of the Babassu Coconut. Polímeros 2021, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chaves, Y.S.; da Silveira, P.H.P.M.; de Neuba, L.M.; Junio, R.F.P.; Ribeiro, M.P.; Monteiro, S.N.; Nascimento, L.F.C. Evaluation of the Density, Mechanical, Thermal and Chemical Properties of Babassu Fibers (Attalea speciosa.) for Potential Composite Reinforcement. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 23, 2089–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. ASTM D3800-99; Standard Test Method for Density of High-Modulus Fibers. American Society for Testing of Mateials—ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2010.
  23. Noryani, M.; Aida, H.J.; Nadlene, R.; Mastura, M.T.; Shaharuzaman, M.A. Correlation Study on Physical Properties and Mechanical Properties of Kenaf Fibre Composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 51, 1309–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lara-Curzio, E.; Garcia, D. The Effect of Diameter Variation Along a Fiber on the Determination of Fiber Strengths and the Parameters of Their Distribution. In 25th Annual Conference on Composites, Advanced Ceramics, Materials, and Structures: A: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, Volume 22, Issue 3; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 363–370. [Google Scholar]
  25. Morais, J.P.S.; de Rosa, M.F.; Marconcini, J.M. Procedimento Para Análise Lignocelulósica. In Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical; Folhetos: Almelo, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 1–54. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sweygers, N.; Depuydt, D.E.C.; Eyley, S.; Thielemans, W.; Mosleh, Y.; Ivens, J.; Dewil, R.; Appels, L.; Van Vuure, A.W. Prediction of the Equilibrium Moisture Content Based on the Chemical Composition and Crystallinity of Natural Fibres. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 186, 115187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. De Araújo, A.A.S.; Mercuri, L.P.; Seixas, S.R.S.; Storpirtis, S.; Matos, J.D.R. Determinação Dos Teores de Umidade e Cinzas de Amostras Comerciais de Guaraná Utilizando Métodos Convencionais e Análise Térmica. Rev. Bras. Ciências Farm. 2006, 42, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yong, T.L.-K.; Matsumura, Y. Reaction Kinetics of the Lignin Conversion in Supercritical Water. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 11975–11988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pérez, J.; Muñoz-Dorado, J.; de la Rubia, T.; Martínez, J. Biodegradation and Biological Treatments of Cellulose, Hemicellulose and Lignin: An Overview. Int. Microbiol. 2002, 5, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Abe, K.; Iwamoto, S.; Yano, H. Obtaining Cellulose Nanofibers with a Uniform Width of 15 Nm from Wood. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 3276–3278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gouveia, E.R.; do Nascimento, R.T.; Souto-Maior, A.M.; de Rocha, G.J.M. Validação de Metodologia Para a Caracterização Química de Bagaço de Cana-de-Açúcar. Quim. Nova 2009, 32, 1500–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Martin, A.R.; Martins, M.A.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Silva, O.R.R.F. Caracterização Química e Estrutural de Fibra de Sisal Da Variedade Agave Sisalana. Polímeros 2009, 19, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vilardell, A.M.; Yadroitsev, I.; Yadroitsava, I.; Albu, M.; Takata, N.; Kobashi, M.; Krakhmalev, P.; Kouprianoff, D.; Kothleitner, G.; Plessis, A. du Manufacturing and Characterization of In-Situ Alloyed Ti6Al4V(ELI)-3 at.% Cu by Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Addit. Manuf. 2020, 36, 101436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Holm, T.P.; Knopp, M.M.; Löbmann, K.; Berthelsen, R. Microwave Induced in Situ Amorphisation Facilitated by Crystalline Hydrates. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 163, 105858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Segal, L.; Creely, J.J.; Martin, A.E.; Conrad, C.M. An Empirical Method for Estimating the Degree of Crystallinity of Native Cellulose Using the X-ray Diffractometer. Text. Res. J. 1959, 29, 786–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Then, Y.Y.; Ibrahim, N.A.; Zainuddin, N.; Ariffin, H.; Wan Yunus, W.M.Z.; Chieng, B.W. Surface Modifications of Oil Palm Mesocarp Fiber by Superheated Steam, Alkali, and Superheated Steam-Alkali for Biocomposite Applications. Bioresources 2014, 9, 7467–7483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Morán, J.I.; Alvarez, V.A.; Cyras, V.P.; Vázquez, A. Extraction of Cellulose and Preparation of Nanocellulose from Sisal Fibers. Cellulose 2008, 15, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mwaikambo, L.Y.; Ansell, M.P. Chemical Modification of Hemp, Sisal, Jute, and Kapok Fibers by Alkalization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002, 84, 2222–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cave, I.D. Theory of X-Ray Measurement of Microfibril Angle in Wood. Wood Sci. Technol. 1997, 31, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. De Neuba, L.M.; Junio, R.F.P.; Souza, A.T.; Ribeiro, M.P.; da Silveira, P.H.P.M.; da Silva, T.T.; Pereira, A.C.; Monteiro, S.N. Mechanical Properties, Critical Length, and Interfacial Strength of Seven-Islands-Sedge Fibers (Cyperus malaccensis) for Possible Epoxy Matrix Reinforcement. Polymers 2022, 14, 3807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hamad, S.F.; Stehling, N.; Holland, C.; Foreman, J.P.; Rodenburg, C. Low-Voltage SEM of Natural Plant Fibers: Microstructure Properties (Surface and Cross-Section) and Their Link to the Tensile Properties. Procedia Eng. 2017, 200, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dinu, L.-D.; Iordache, O.; Vamanu, E. Scanning Electron Microscopy Study on the Biodeterioration of Natural Fiber Materials Compared to Disposable Hygiene and Sanitary Products. Fermentation 2022, 8, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Da Batista, M.S.; Teixeira, L.A.; de Louly, A.S.; Silva, S.O.; da Luz, S.M. Fatigue Damage Propagation and Creep Behavior on Sisal/Epoxy Composites. Polímeros 2022, 32, e2022008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Monteiro, S.N.; Satyanarayana, K.G.; Lopes, F.P.D. High Strength Natural Fibers for Improved Polymer Matrix Composites. Mater. Sci. Forum 2010, 638–642, 961–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Satyanarayana, K.G.; Ravikumar, K.K.; Sukumaran, K.; Mukherjee, P.S.; Pillai, S.G.K.; Kulkarni, A.G. Structure and Properties of Some Vegetable Fibres. J. Mater. Sci. 1986, 21, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. De Furtado, J.B.M.; Furtado Filho, P.A.; Pereira Oliveira, T.; De Sousa Caetano, M.R.; De Souza Araújo, I.M.; Figueiredo, F.C.; Dos Santos Júnior, J.R. Caracterização Química Da Fibra Do Caule Da Palmeira de Babaçu Natural e Após Tratamento. Rev. Eng. Pesqui. Apl. 2020, 5, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bledzki, A.K.; Reihmane, M.P.; Gassan, J. Properties and Modification Methods for Vegetable Fibers for Natural Fiber Composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1996, 59, 1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ashori, A.; Bahreini, Z. Evaluation of Calotropis Gigantea as a Promising Raw Material for Fiber-Reinforced Composite. J. Compos. Mater. 2009, 43, 1297–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ashori, A. Pulp and Paper from Kenaf Bast Fibers. Fiber Polym. 2006, 7, 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Moshi, A.A.M.; Ravindran, D.; Bharathi, S.R.S.; Indran, S.; Saravanakumar, S.S.; Liu, Y. Characterization of a New Cellulosic Natural Fiber Extracted from the Root of Ficus Religiosa Tree. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 142, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Balaji, A.N.; Nagarajan, K.J. Characterization of Alkali Treated and Untreated New Cellulosic Fiber from Saharan Aloe Vera Cactus Leaves. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 174, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Palanisamy, S.; Kalimuthu, M.; Palaniappan, M.; Alavudeen, A.; Rajini, N.; Santulli, C. Morphological Characterization of Soapbark Fibers. J. Mater. Sci. Res. Rev. 2021, 8, 19–26. [Google Scholar]
  53. Monteiro, S.N.; Lopes, F.P.D.; Barbosa, A.P.; Bevitori, A.B.; Da Silva, I.L.A.; Costa, L.L. Da Natural Lignocellulosic Fibers as Engineering Materials—An Overview. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2011, 42, 2963–2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Saheb, D.N.; Jog, J.P. Natural Fiber Polymer Composites: A Review. Adv. Polym. Technol. 1999, 18, 351–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mohanty, A.K.; Misra, M.; Hinrichsen, G. Biofibres, Biodegradable Polymers and Biocomposites: An Overview. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2000, 276–277, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Feldman, D. Wood—Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions, by D. Fengel and G. Wegener, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin and New York, 1984, 613 Pp. Price: 245 DM. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Lett. Ed. 1985, 23, 601–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Spinacé, M.A.S.; Lambert, C.S.; Fermoselli, K.K.G.; De Paoli, M.-A. Characterization of Lignocellulosic Curaua Fibres. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 77, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sumesh, K.R.; Kanthavel, K.; Kavimani, V. Peanut Oil Cake-Derived Cellulose Fiber: Extraction, Application of Mechanical and Thermal Properties in Pineapple/Flax Natural Fiber Composites. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 150, 775–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Vijay, R.; Vinod, A.; Lenin Singaravelu, D.; Sanjay, M.R.; Siengchin, S. Characterization of Chemical Treated and Untreated Natural Fibers from Pennisetum orientale Grass—A Potential Reinforcement for Lightweight Polymeric Applications. Int. J. Lightweight Mater. Manuf. 2021, 4, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Saravanakumar, S.S.; Kumaravel, A.; Nagarajan, T.; Moorthy, I.G. Investigation of Physico-Chemical Properties of Alkali-Treated Prosopis juliflora Fibers. Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. 2014, 19, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Boudjellal, A.; Trache, D.; Khimeche, K.; Hafsaoui, S.L.; Razali, M.S. Preparation and Characterization of Graphene Oxide-Based Natural Hybrids Containing Alfa Fibers or Microcrystalline Cellulose. J. Nat. Fibers 2022, 19, 5321–5332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Okafor, C.E.; Kebodi, L.C.; Ihueze, C.C.; Rangappa, S.M.; Siengchin, S.; Okonkwo, U.C. Development of Dioscorea Alata Stem Fibers as Eco-Friendly Reinforcement for Composite Materials. J. King Saud. Univ. Eng. Sci. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Saraiva Rodrigues, S.C.; da Silva, A.S.; de Carvalho, L.H.; Alves, T.S.; Barbosa, R. Morphological, Structural, Thermal Properties of a Native Starch Obtained from Babassu Mesocarp for Food Packaging Application. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 15670–15678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Maniglia, B.C.; Tapia-Blácido, D.R. Isolation and Characterization of Starch from Babassu Mesocarp. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 55, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Reis, R.H.M.; Nunes, L.F.; Oliveira, M.S.; de Junior, V.F.V.; Filho, F.D.C.G.; Pinheiro, M.A.; Candido, V.S.; Monteiro, S.N. Guaruman Fiber: Another Possible Reinforcement in Composites. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 622–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kretschmann, D.E.; Alden, H.A.; Verrill, S. Variations of Microfibril Angle in Loblolly Pine: Comparison of Iodine Crystallization and X-ray Diffraction Techniques. Microfibril Angle in Wood; University of Canterbury: Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998; pp. 157–176. [Google Scholar]
  67. Gherardi Hein, P.R.; Tarcísio Lima, J. Relationships between Microfibril Angle, Modulus of Elasticity and Compressive Strength in Eucalyptus Wood. Maderas. Cienc. Tecnol. 2012, 14, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mahdi, E.; Ochoa, D.R.H.; Vaziri, A.; Dean, A.; Kucukvar, M. Khalasa Date Palm Leaf Fiber as a Potential Reinforcement for Polymeric Composite Materials. Compos. Struct. 2021, 256, 113501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pinheiro, M.A.; Ribeiro, M.M.; Rosa, D.L.S.; da Nascimento, D.C.B.; da Silva, A.C.R.; dos Reis, M.A.L.; Monteiro, S.N.; Candido, V.S. Periquiteira (Cochlospermum orinocense): A Promising Amazon Fiber for Application in Composite Materials. Polymers 2023, 15, 2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Polymers 15 03863 g001
Figure 1. Babassu palm (Attalea speciosa Mart. ex Spreng.): (a) palm; (b) coir; and (c) extracted fiber.
Figure 1. Babassu palm (Attalea speciosa Mart. ex Spreng.): (a) palm; (b) coir; and (c) extracted fiber.
Polymers 15 03863 g001
Polymers 15 03863 g002
Figure 2. Results of thermal analysis of babassu fibers: (a) TG/DTG; (b) DSC.
Figure 2. Results of thermal analysis of babassu fibers: (a) TG/DTG; (b) DSC.
Polymers 15 03863 g002
Polymers 15 03863 g003
Figure 3. FTIR spectrum for babassu fibers.
Figure 3. FTIR spectrum for babassu fibers.
Polymers 15 03863 g003
Polymers 15 03863 g004
Figure 4. Flowchart indicating the steps to obtain babassu fibers.
Figure 4. Flowchart indicating the steps to obtain babassu fibers.
Polymers 15 03863 g004
Polymers 15 03863 g005
Figure 5. Positioning of babassu fibers on the monocrystalline silicon substrate and placement of the fiber in the diffractometer for analysis.
Figure 5. Positioning of babassu fibers on the monocrystalline silicon substrate and placement of the fiber in the diffractometer for analysis.
Polymers 15 03863 g005
Polymers 15 03863 g006
Figure 6. Diameter measurements from the cross-section of the babassu fiber. Magnification of 5×.
Figure 6. Diameter measurements from the cross-section of the babassu fiber. Magnification of 5×.
Polymers 15 03863 g006
Polymers 15 03863 g007
Figure 7. Frequency histogram by diameter interval of babassu fibers.
Figure 7. Frequency histogram by diameter interval of babassu fibers.
Polymers 15 03863 g007
Polymers 15 03863 g008
Figure 8. Diffractogram of babassu fiber.
Figure 8. Diffractogram of babassu fiber.
Polymers 15 03863 g008
Polymers 15 03863 g009
Figure 9. Methodology for determining the microfibril angle of babassu fiber.
Figure 9. Methodology for determining the microfibril angle of babassu fiber.
Polymers 15 03863 g009
Polymers 15 03863 g010
Figure 10. SEM micrograph of the babassu fiber surface indicating fiber morphology at different magnifications: 100, 1500, and 4000×.
Figure 10. SEM micrograph of the babassu fiber surface indicating fiber morphology at different magnifications: 100, 1500, and 4000×.
Polymers 15 03863 g010
Table 1. Babassu fiber density and tensile results as a function of fiber diameter variation. Reproduced with permission from [21].
Table 1. Babassu fiber density and tensile results as a function of fiber diameter variation. Reproduced with permission from [21].
Diameter Intervals (mm)Average Density (g/cm3)Ultimate Tensile Strength (MPa)Elongation (%)Elastic Modulus (GPa)
0.18–0.230.79 ± 0.03100.76 ± 10.181.59 ± 0.166.33 ± 0.64
0.23–0.290.70 ± 0.0476.41 ± 7.722.98 ± 0.302.56 ± 0.26
0.29–0.340.66 ± 0.0347.61 ± 5.322.05 ± 0.202.32 ± 0.23
0.34–0.400.53 ± 0.0431.18 ± 3.151.18 ± 0.112.87 ± 0.29
0.40–0.450.42 ± 0.0324.97 ± 2.521.94 ± 0.201.94 ± 0.13
0.45–0.470.27 ± 0.0117.96 ± 0.611.56 ± 0.151.15 ± 0.11
Table 2. Chemical composition of babassu fiber compared to other fibers.
Table 2. Chemical composition of babassu fiber compared to other fibers.
FiberMC%EC%ASC%LC%HC%HEC% *AC%Ref.
Babassu7.0515.722.4328.5370.3132.3437.97p.a *
Babassu-8.50-21.974.508.9065.50[46]
Jute12.60.50-12.0074.6013.6061.00[47]
Mudar--2.5018.0076.00-57.00[48]
Kenaf--2.20–6.0014.00–17.0076.00–77.00-45.00–46.00[49]
Ficus9.33-3.9610.13-13.8655.38[50]
Cactus5.80--13.70-8.2067.40[51]
Soapbark12.0-5.0018.00-20.0037.00[52]
p.a *—present article; HEC *—hemicellulose content.
Table 3. Comparison of X-ray diffraction properties of babassu fibers with other fibers.
Table 3. Comparison of X-ray diffraction properties of babassu fibers with other fibers.
XRD PropertiesBabassu
(P.A *)		Babassu [63]Guaruman [65]Eucalyptus [67]Seven-Islands-Sedge
[40]
MFA%7.64-7.8013.907.36
CI%81.0615.00–45.0067.00-62.47
P.A *—present article.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chaves, Y.S.; da Silveira, P.H.P.M.; Monteiro, S.N.; Nascimento, L.F.C. Babassu Coconut Fibers: Investigation of Chemical and Surface Properties (Attalea speciosa.). Polymers 2023, 15, 3863. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15193863

AMA Style

Chaves YS, da Silveira PHPM, Monteiro SN, Nascimento LFC. Babassu Coconut Fibers: Investigation of Chemical and Surface Properties (Attalea speciosa.). Polymers. 2023; 15(19):3863. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15193863

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chaves, Yago Soares, Pedro Henrique Poubel Mendonça da Silveira, Sergio Neves Monteiro, and Lucio Fabio Cassiano Nascimento. 2023. "Babassu Coconut Fibers: Investigation of Chemical and Surface Properties (Attalea speciosa.)" Polymers 15, no. 19: 3863. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15193863

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop