You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Barbara Palmieri1,
  • Fabrizia Cilento1 and
  • Eugenio Amendola1,*
  • et al.

Reviewer 1: Muhammad Akhsin Muflikhun Reviewer 2: Shakila Parveen Asraf Ali

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

We added the reviewers comment at the attachment

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

moderate english are applied to the manuscript.

Author Response

Thank you, we appreciate the time and the effort that you have dedicated to providing your valuable feedback on the manuscript. Here is a point-by-point response to the reviewers’ comments and concerns

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Minor english editing is required.

Author Response

Thank you, we appreciate the time and the effort that you have dedicated to providing your valuable feedback on the manuscript. Here is a point-by-point response to the reviewers’ comments and concerns.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

After carefully checking the manuscript and reading through the parts that focus on the reviewer's answer, I recommend the present paper be accepted.

Author Response

The authors are grateful for helping us to improve the manuscript.

Reviewer 2 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We appreciate the time and the effort that you have dedicated to provide your valuable feedback on the manuscript. Here is a point-by-point response to the reviewers’ comments and concerns.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 3

Reviewer 2 Report

All the comments are answered. The manuscript can be accepted for publication.