1. Introduction
The significant corrosion of metals through chemical reactions and structural weakening reduces their performance capability and, in some cases, renders them impracticable in certain applications. For example, in the marine industry, a disparaging process that results in significant economic losses is associated with metals’ corrosion. The replacement or repair cost of these metallic parts can result in various safety issues and additional cost. Efforts to reduce these factors include coating the metal in organic material to create a protective barrier on the metallic area. However, even so, the organic polymer coatings are still susceptible to micro and nano-level damages, such as scratches and dents, usually during the handling of the material [
1]. Such damage can be challenging to identify, which could proliferate the corrosion process, rendering the coating nonbeneficial. To mitigate this issue, ‘self-healing’ (SH) polymers introduce active form of protection, in which a self-regenerating polymer with an active material can be incorporated.
SH is a process in which materials can repair/heal themselves when damaged by chemical, thermal or mechanical stimuli, allowing them to restore their original properties. SH can be categorized into intrinsic and extrinsic. Intrinsic SH concerns the material’s inherent ability to heal itself through the presence of specific reversible chemical bonds. Such bonds can include ionic interactions, hydrogen bonds, halogen bonds, radical-based systems,
—
interactions, and metal-ligand interactions [
2]. In contrast, extrinsic SH concerns the set of materials that are usually sequestered from a matrix, such as a micro/nano capsule. When the host matrix is damaged, the healing agent is released into the damaged zone to conduct the healing process via a chemical reaction [
3]. The SH agent is used as the material that performs the SH process, and common SH agents include natural drying oils, epoxy resins, cyanoacrylates, methyl methacrylate, hydrogel, and bacteria-based microcapsules [
4].
Various examples of SH coatings can include the application of a SH agent in malleable polymers, polyelectrolyte complexes, and the encapsulation of a healing agent in nano/microcapsules [
1,
5,
6]. Such nano/microcapsules are usually polymeric spherical structures loaded with drying oils or resins, in which a stimulus would initiate the SH process, such as mechanical damage, pH changes, temperature change, desorption, or ion exchange [
1]. The application of such coatings is a relatively recent concept in corrosion protection technology and is one that seems to be extremely promising.
Drying oils can be used as oxidative SH agents and core materials in the microcapsules [
1,
7,
8]. In this case, polymerization can occur without a catalyst, simply through the interaction with oxygen in the atmosphere. The rapid curing (cross-linking of polymer chains) of these oils is usually associated with the unsaturated conjugated systems in their structure [
4]. Tung oil has been employed in various applications, such as varnishes, paints, printing inks and oil cloths, due to its ability to form a tough solid film after it polymerizes. The curing rate of the oil corresponds to the degree of unsaturation, in which faster cross-linking occurs when the degree of unsaturation is high [
7]. Examples of the application of tung oil PUF microcapsules includes the work carried out by Paolini et al. [
9]. Their work compared tung oil microcapsules with copaiba oil, which created average microcapsule diameters of 22 µm and 25 µm, respectively. It was also observed that the tung oil microcapsules provided more positive results for corrosion protection via open circuit potential (OCP) testing than the copaiba oil samples. Furthermore, Li et al. [
10] encapsulated tung oil with a PUF shell, in which an average diameter of 105 µm was observed, and a core content of 80%. Additionally, scratch testing and immersion in NaCl solution concluded that steel plates coated with epoxy resin embedded with microcapsules exhibited improved corrosion resistance.
To prevent SH oils from curing in atmospheric open conditions unintentionally, they can be protected via microencapsulation processes. This concerns the entrapment of droplets by a protective wall material, providing a protective barrier between the core material and oxygen [
11]. A microencapsulation method known as ‘one-step in-situ polymerisation’ is commonly utilised to encapsulate various core materials for multiple applications. Amino resins, such as urea-formaldehyde (UF), is an excellent shell material candidate for the encapsulation of SH core materials. The benefits of the amino resins include chemical and water resistance, long term storage capability, high mechanical strength, high loading, good thermal stability, and low permeability [
12,
13,
14,
15]. The most crucial parameters to consider are the temperature, emulsification speed, pH, reaction time, and emulsifier type and concentration [
13,
16,
17,
18,
19,
20].
With the one-step in-situ polymerization process, the emulsifier dramatically affects the quality of the microcapsules in terms of the morphology, size distribution, surface roughness and shell barrier properties [
13,
19,
21]. Emulsifiers have many functions in the polymerization process, such as reducing the interfacial tension between the water and oil phase and forming micelles that can stabilize monomer droplets in an emulsion form and stabilize the growth rate of monomer/polymer species [
22]. For this process, a frequently used emulsifier is poly(ethylene-alt-maleic anhydride) (PEMA), a synthetic polymeric emulsifier. For example, in a one-step in situ polymerization process, Farzi et al. [
23] encapsulated cerium nitrate with a PUF shell and PEMA as the emulsifier. It was observed that the microcapsules did not exhibit uniform morphology, with approximately 92% payload. Other synthetic polymers used in this process include polyacrylamide, poly(ethyl enamine), poly(ethylene glycol), poly(methyl methacrylate, poly(acrylic acid) and poly(vinyl alcohol) [
19]. Yoshizawa et al. [
21] further investigated alternative compounds to PEMA that can also be used as emulsifiers, including poly(olefin-maleic anhydride) and poly(acrylic acid). They stated that the surfactant must contain a carboxyl or maleic acid group to form a polyurea microcapsule membrane, which PEMA contains.
However, hydrocolloids can be used as naturally abundant emulsifiers, which is a strong advantage in terms of availability for industrial scale-up. Additionally, hydrocolloids are more environmentally friendly and biodegradable, which reduces the overall carbon footprint of this process. Therefore, gelatin (GEL) is suggested to be used as an alternative to the very commonly used PEMA emulsifier, reducing the environmental footprint of this process. GEL is derived from natural sources and not chemically synthesized, and it is extracted from the raw collagen from animals, usually raised for consumption. Thus, the usage of GEL promotes the full use of these animals, contributing to a more ‘zero-waste’ food economy. Nonetheless, further work needs to be carried out in this field to further explore alternative environmentally viable candidates to replace synthetic polymers in the microencapsulation process. Potential feasible candidates for this process include gum Arabic, xanthan gum, pectin, chitosan, methylcellulose, guar gum and locust bean gum [
19,
24]. Zhang et al. [
24] encapsulated a volatile phase change material (PCM) with the use of xanthan gum and methylcellulose, in which the results conveyed that the xanthan gum produced microcapsules with superior core material retention to methyl cellulose. Yu et al. [
25] encapsulated thermochromic compounds with gum Arabic as the emulsifier, in which there was an immediate emulsification effect of the core, and the microcapsules maintained the thermochromic ability [
25].
In the present work, the emulsifiers used are PEMA and GEL to compare a synthetic emulsifier with a naturally abundant bio-based option. Tung oil was selected as the healing agent. Currently, there has been no work carried out to encapsulate tung oil as a SH agent with the use of GEL as an emulsifier. Subsequently, after optimizing the encapsulation procedure, various characterizations of the SH microcapsules were then carried out. Such characterizations include morphology, size distribution, chemical and crystalline structures and thermal properties. Additionally, a novel and innovative FIB method is also utilised to confirm the storage and release of the active tung oil material. Additionally, the self-healing processes, and the corrosion resistance of the epoxy coating loaded with synthesized microcapsules were also showed. The aim of this study is to improve the barrier and morphological properties of micro-capsules, as well as increase the payload, yield, and encapsulation efficiency for process optimization.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
The following chemicals were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (Gillingham, UK): formaldehyde solution (104003, ACS reagent, about 37.0% in solution, resorcinol (398047, ACS reagent, ≥99.0%), poly(ethylene-alt-maleic-anhydride) (188050, average Mw 100,000~500,000 g mol−1), gelatin (04055, from porcine skin), ethanol (24102, 99.8%). Tung oil (100% pure) was bought from Hopes (Fort Mill, SC, USA). Ammonium chloride (99.5%) was acquired from Daejung, Siheung-si, Korea. Hempaprime Multi 500 epoxy primer and Hempathane curing agent 97050 were purchased from Hempel, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. All the chemicals listed were used without any additional modification.
2.2. Microencapsulation Process
The microencapsulation of the tung oil was carried out via one-step in-situ polymer-ization. The emulsifier solutions were pre-prepared before the experiment, by mixing 0.5 g gelatin and 0.5 g PEMA in 150 g distilled water, respectively, in a 300 mL beaker. Using a Kern ABT 100-5NM balance, 2.5 g urea, 0.25 g resorcinol, and 0.25 g ammonium chloride were measured in the pre-prepared 300 mL beaker. Using a Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) HPS RT2 Advanced stirrer, this solution was stirred at room temperature until a clear solution was observed. The pH of the solution was adjusted to pH 3.5 (to promote the polymer condensation reaction) using a Mettler Toledo (Columbus, OH, USA) SevenCompact Duo pH meter, by adding a diluted 1 mol L−1 HCl solution.
The prepared solution was then placed under a Silverson L5M-A homogenizer at 2500 rpm. An amount of 10 mL of the tung oil was added dropwise into the solution, and this was left for 30 min to stabilize the oil droplets. A stainless-steel baffle was then placed in the beaker, and the solution was then placed in a LabTech LWB-111D water bath, at 25 °C, and 6.5 mL of formaldehyde was injected. Then the solution temperature was raised to 55 °C and maintained at this temperature for 4 h (the usual reaction time for successful encapsulation [
26]). After the 4 h elapsed, the solution was cooled down to 25 °C.
Subsequently, after the reaction was completed, the microcapsules were separated using a separation funnel, and washed 5 times with water (30 °C) using a vacuum filtration process. The samples were then left to dry overnight for a 12-h period, ready for storage and future use. Three batches of each sample were formulated.
2.3. Payload, Yield, and Encapsulation Efficiency
To analyze the payload of the of the microcapsules, dried powdered microcapsule samples were weighed, and placed in a circular compression die, to form a compressed tablet. The samples were then compressed with a Lloyd Instruments LS100 Plus Materials Testing Machine. A maximum force of 80 kN at 10 mm·min
−1 for 240 s was used to compress the dry microcapsules to breakage, to release the tung oil. Successively, the capsules were left to dry in an oven at 150 °C for a duration of 24 h, for further drying of the compressed shell. The dried and compressed capsule shells were then weighed. The payload of the formulated microcapsules (
PL) which is the mass ratio of the core materials to the microcapsules was calculated by [
20]:
where
is the weight of the compressed microcapsules, and
is the weight of the uncompressed microcapsules.
The yield of the formulation process which is the mass ratio of the product to raw materials was then calculated by:
where
is the total mass of the microcapsule products after the formulation process, and
is the weight of all the materials used for synthesizing the shell and core, excluding the deionized water.
The encapsulation efficiency (
EE), which is the percentage of the encapsulated core materials, was then calculated by:
where
is the total amount of tung oil injected in the homogenization process.
2.4. Characterization process
2.4.1. Microscopy of Microcapsules
To capture the bright-field images and to observe the shape morphology of the microcapsules, an Optical Microscope DSX 1000 with a DSX10-SXLOB lens was utilized. Differential interference contrast (DIC) was also used in the OM imaging process. This technique introduces contrast to images of samples which would otherwise have hardly noticeable contrast when viewed using brightfield microscopy. Therefore, the images produced using DIC have a pseudo 3D-effect.
In addition, scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging was carried out in a dual beam system, Scio2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The electron column is equipped with a Schottky field emission gun (FEG) source which gives a high resolution of <1 nm at optimized condition. The system supports advanced scanning strategies (Thermo Scientific SmartSCAN™) which allows line averaging and interlaced scanning in addition to Drift Corrected Frame Integration (DCFI). The ion column has liquid Ga ion emitter that provides focused ion beam (FIB). The ion beam can achieve a resolution of 3.0 nm. In our experiments, FIB milling process was used to cut the microcapsules. A beam energy of 30 keV and currents in the range of 1–7 nA were used during the milling process. To increase the conductivity of the samples, the microcapsules were coated with ~5 nm of Chromium with a Quorum Q150R ES sputter.
ImageJ (an image processing programme) was used for the quantification of the microcapsule shell thickness. A scale bar was set with a calibration setting, allowing for the evaluation for the shell thickness, in which a mean value was obtained.
2.4.2. Particle Size Dstribution
The microcapsule size distributions were characterized by Malvern Mastersizer 2000 particle analyser with a wet dispersion unit (Hydro 2000S). Deionized water was used as dispersant. Each experiment was carried out in quintuplets, with samples measured straight from the aqueous solution. The Malvern software computed the average size distribution, evaluating the average particle sizes, the span, and the D[3,2] (Sauter mean diameter) parameter. The D[3,2] was selected due to its sensitivity to surface area.
2.4.3. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
Attenuated total reflection (ATR) mode and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) were carried out using a Bruker (Billerica, MA, USA) FT-IR Microscope (LUMOS II). The ATR–FTIR spectra were used to measure an infrared spectrum of microcapsules with a wavelength range of 800–4000 cm−1. The number of scans was set to 16, with a resolution of 4 cm−1. The samples were prepared as thin tablets by a Lloyd Instruments LS100 Plus Materials Testing Machine, with a force of 40 kN, for observation in the spectrometer. Origin Pro 2021b (a data analysis software) (Northampton, MA, USA) was then used to analyze the peaks of the spectra, with the use of the Origin Pro 2021b Gaussian peak analyzer, and the baseline anchor method selected.
2.4.4. Thermogravimetric Analysis
The Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) was performed using a Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer (STA, Netzsch, Selb, Germany, STA449-F5 Jupiter). The TGA measured the changing of the mass over time by changing the temperature. Sample masses between 10 mg and 15 mg were loaded in an aluminium crucible with a lid and heated from 50 to 550 °C under N2 atmosphere at the rate of 10 °C min−1.
2.4.5. X-ray Diffraction
The crystallographic structure for the microcapsules was tested at room temperature (25 °C) by a Bruker D8 Advance X-Ray Diffractometer with a Cu Tube (1.5418 Å) and a LYNXEYE XE-T detector. The XRD parameters were adjusted as follows, an angular increment of 0.01°, a current of 40 mA, an operating voltage of 40 kV, and a scanning rate of 0.8 s/step. The samples were prepared into a silicon ingot and collected in the range of 2θ = 10–70°.
2.4.6. Preparation of the Self-Healing Epoxy Coating
The microcapsules were dispersed into the Hempel Hempaprime 500 epoxy resin primer and Hempathane curing agent 97050, and gently stirred with a glass rod mixer. Subsequently, the coatings (the pure epoxy primer and the primer mix containing the microcapsules) were sprayed onto A36 steel plates (15 10 3 cm), with a Devilbliss GTI Spray Gun (1.8 bar with a 0.5 mm nozzle). This thickness of the coatings was then verified by a GE Instruments CL5 Thickness Gauge with an average of 20 data points, with an average thickness of 177 µm.
2.4.7. Corrosion Resistance and Self-Healing Performance
A scalpel was used to produce scratches on the coated samples. The width of the scratches was approximately 30 μm, and the length of each scratch was 1 cm. Corrosion resistance of the coatings was visually detected after submerging the samples in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution for a period of 24 and 48 h, at a temperature of ~25 °C.
2.4.8. Adhesion Testing
Pull-off tests were carried out to investigate the adhesive tests for the epoxy primer with the steel substrate, with and without the addition of microcapsules. Therefore, the force required to detach the test dollies glued to the primer layer from the underlaying substrate was tested The tests were carried out according to ASTM D4541-09 standards.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
For statistical analysis of the results, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey HSD (Honest significant difference) methods were used. ANOVA is a set of statistical models and their related estimate processes (such as the “variation” among and across groups) used to assess the variances between groups’ means (or averages). The Tukey HSD test is a statistical method for determining if the relationship between sets of data is statistically significant [
27]. The ANOVA and Tukey’s analysis methods were carried out with Astatsa software (2016, Navendu Vasavada). With this analysis, we can obtain the ‘
p-value’, which is a metric that expresses the likelihood that an observed difference may have occurred by chance. The statistical significance of the observed difference increases as the
p-value decreases. A value of (
p ≤ 0.05) indicated a significant difference between the means. Additionally, The Q statistic is used to separate the variability seen between studies into that which is due to random fluctuation and that which is due to possible differences between tests [
28].
4. Conclusions
In this work, tung oil was encapsulated with a urea-formaldehyde shell via the use of one-step in situ polymerization. We proposed that the main differences in the morphological properties of the microcapsules stem in the differences in the functional groups of the emulsifiers used in this process. Under such a premise, the conventionally used PEMA emulsifier was compared with the natural GEL emulsifier. The results conveyed GEL as a promising naturally abundant alternative. The microcapsules produced with GEL produced superior payload, yield, and encapsulation efficiency with 96.5, 28.9 and 61.7%, respectively, while PEMA resulted in values of 90.8, 28.6 and 52.6%, respectively.
Furthermore, the GEL microcapsules had a more uniform morphology and a much smoother surface texture comparing with PEMA. As observed in the OM and SEM images, there were very few surface polymers on the surface of the prepared GEL microcapsules. The particle size monitoring during the reaction process also conveyed the differences in the morphological behaviours during the synthesis, in which the PEMA samples produced larger and more broad particle sizes.
Additionally, the GEL samples had a thinner shell by 65% compared to the PEMA samples. The GEL samples also exhibited a more crystalline structure, which alludes to higher hydrolytic stability, which is excellent for long term storage and reduced chances of formaldehyde emission from the shell, which is another added merit in terms of safety and environmental concerns.
Moreover, the FIB process’s novel and innovative milling procedure conveyed the successful entrapment and release of the tung oil upon rupture in the GEL samples. The self-healing was also evaluated for the substances, conveying that the microcapsules containing GEL exhibited a higher healing efficiency of 91%, compared to the 63% healing efficiency established by the PEMA samples. Furthermore, all the samples containing the microcapsules in the epoxy primer coated on the steel substrate established corrosion resistance after 48 h, with the GEL samples conveying exceptional results.
The significance of our findings lies in the fact that the emulsifier of choice can significantly affect the microcapsules’ morphological, crystalline and barrier properties. With this, factors such as the microcapsule size, shell thickness and surface roughness may be fine-tuned and controlled for the intended application by altering the emulsifier of choice.