Optimization of Demineralization and Pyrolysis Performance of Eucalyptus Hydrothermal Pretreatment
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
There are a few notes on writing the article.
1. There are some typos in the text (page 1, lines 32, 37, 39; page 4, Fig.1; page 11, Fig.5).
- The phrases on lines 82-85 (page 2) and line 32 (page 9) sound rather strange.
- Figures 4 and 5 captions are too laconic. It would be more clear to the reader if the authors mentioned what is shown in Fig. a, b, c, etc.
Author Response
Dear reviewer
Thank you for your letter and for the comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Optimization of demineralization and pyrolysis performance of eucalyptus hydrothermal pretreatment”. We have studied your comments carefully and have made corrections which we hope could meet your requirements. Any revisions made to the manuscript are marked up using the “Track Changes” function.
Questions you put forward are explained as follows:
- There are some typos in the text (page 1, lines 32, 37, 39; page 4, Fig.1; page 11, Fig.5).
We are very sorry for our incorrect writing. The typos have been replaced with the correct spelling in revised version.
- The phrases on lines 82-85 (page 2) and line 32 (page 9) sound rather strange.
Related phrases have been modified according to the suggestion.
- Figures 4 and 5 captions are too laconic. It would be more clear to the reader if the authors mentioned what is shown in Fig. a, b, c, etc.
The captions of Figures 4 and 5 have been modified in the revised edition.
As a whole, issues the referee suggested are very pertinent, which are very helpful to modify my entire paper and thank you very much again.
Reviewer 2 Report
The manuscript is well written and will be helpful for cellulose research community.
Author Response
Dear reviewer
Thank you for your letter and for the comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Optimization of demineralization and pyrolysis performance of eucalyptus hydrothermal pretreatment”. Thank you very much for your affirmation of our work. We will continue to work hard and make our own contribution to cellulose research. In addition, some spelling mistakes in the manuscript were corrected by close examination. Any revisions made to the manuscript are marked up using the “Track Changes” function.
All in all, thank you very much for your review and wish you every success in your work.
