1. Introduction
In nature, many plants and insects, including plant leaves, the wing of the butterfly and the leg of the water strider, exhibit excellent superhydrophobicity [
1,
2,
3,
4]. A superhydrophobic surface, defined as the one with a water contact angle larger than 150°, has been widely used in various applications [
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12]. Both static water contact angle (CA) and sliding angle (SA) have been employed to assess the performance of superhydrophobic surfaces. The former corresponds to the wettability of certain liquids while the latter represents the contact angle hysteresis. In the past few years, two typical superhydrophobic examples of lotus leaves and rose petals have been paid much attention because of their interesting properties [
13,
14,
15,
16,
17,
18,
19,
20,
21,
22]. Water droplets on the former exhibit high CA and low SA, while high CA and high SA can be observed on the latter. In other words, lotus leaves and rose petals correspond to anti-adhesive and adhesive surfaces, respectively, which play key roles in many fields. For instance, the combination of them endows the surface containing micro-arrays with a special ability in achieving programmable droplet motion and transportation along a certain direction [
21]. The transition between them, therefore, is highly desired but still challenging.
It is well known that wettability is under the control of surface composition and roughness. To achieve the transition between adhesion and anti-adhesion, much effort has been made according to the manipulation strategy of chemical composition and micro-structures on the target surface, as well as the combination of them. Firstly, it is possible to achieve this transition by varying chemical composition [
18,
19]. Su and his co-workers introduced hydrophilic defects on polyelectrolyte multilayer (PEM) surfaces supported by rough silica nanoparticles. These hydrophilic regions lead to the obvious collapse of water droplets into gaps among neighboring particles. This is the reason for the transition from an anti-adhesive state to an adhesive state [
18]. Secondly, roughness plays an important role in the transition [
20,
21]. Chen et al. realized the transition between lotus leaves and rose petals effect by manipulating pillar array [
21]. Upon stretching, the period of micro/nanostructure on the homogeneous surface of the film increased remarkably, accounting for the lower magnitude of surface roughness and the resultant transition from pinning to rolling performance. Finally, simultaneous adjustment of the chemical composition and surface geometry can act as an efficient method for this transition. In our previous work, thermoplastic polyurethane electrospun fibers have been used as the bottom layer to fabricate composite fabrics of TPU/MWCNTs (multi-walled carbon nanotubes) [
22]. The attained fabrics exhibit high CA and low SA due to the existence of MWCNTs on their surface, corresponding to the lotus leaves effect. Uniaxial tension produced reduced surface roughness and complicated chemical composition of the surface, contributing to the rose petals effect.
So far, some strategies for the transition discussed above have become available. In the efficient rolling-pinning transition on a superhydrophobic surface with controllable adhesive performance, however, there are still some open problems. On one hand, programmable transition, which means that the adhesive/anti-adhesive states can be fixed in some cases while the transition can be triggered when required, remains challenging. On the other hand, the developed strategy concerns either the requirement of special equipment (e.g., a micro-array template in [
20]) or high cost (MWCNTs in [
22]), which does limit its mass production and applications. A facile strategy for fabrication and transition has been highly desired. In this work, therefore, it is proposed to achieve the programmable transition according to the idea shown in
Scheme 1, in which the shape memory PLLA films are covered by porous PVDF spheres [
23]. After preparation, the surface of PVDF@PLLA composite film exhibits the lotus leaves effect because of the hydrophobic performance and roughness resulting from neighboring spheres, corresponding to a high contact angle and low sliding angle. Upon uniaxial or biaxial tension, there is obvious deformation on PLLA films, leading to the exposed area which has not been covered by porous PVDF spheres. This is the reason for the occurrence of hydrophilic defects (PLLA) on hydrophobic PVDF surfaces, accounting for the enhanced contact angle hysteresis, i.e., rose petals effect. The transition between them is programmable, reversible and easy to handle. It can be well controlled based on shape fix and the recovery abilities of the shape memory effect of PLLA.
3. Results and Discussion
Porous PVDF spheres were prepared according to the strategy discussed in our previous work [
23]. In short, in a ternary blend of PVDF/PMMA/PLLA with compatibilizers (SZ-01, 0.5 wt%), phase separation produced PVDF/PMMA mixed phase and PLLA phase. The latter acted as a matrix due to the higher volume fraction. Upon etching with chloroform, both PLLA matrix and PMMA in mixed phase were removed, yielding porous PVDF spheres with a diameter of several microns (
Figure 1B). In the fabrication of porous PVDF spheres, therefore, PMMA acts as the agency for narrow nanopores. On these spheres, there are narrow pores in nanometers (
Figure 1C) that resulted from the exclusion behaviors of PMMA during the crystallization of PVDF (i.e., narrow pores from the crystallization template) [
24,
25,
26]. The PLLA film with a thickness of 300 μm was prepared by means of hot-pressing. Several drops of chloroform (a good solvent for PLLA, poor solvent for PVDF) were produced on PLLA film to swell the surface layer. Then, porous PVDF spheres were placed and pressed slightly on the swollen PLLA film. In this way, the porous spheres were embedded partly and fixed on the surface of PLLA film (
Figure 1A). The free (un-embedded) spheres were removed by blowing with compressed nitrogen. To assess the water wettability on PLLA films and PVDF spheres, drop shape analysis (DSA) measurements have been performed. The results are shown in
Figure 1D–F. On neat PLLA films, the water contact angle is roughly 85.7°, suggesting a hydrophilic surface. To measure the contact angle of porous PVDF spheres, multi-layers of them have been prepared on transparent tape. In this case, water droplets come in contact with only PVDF spheres, which is an efficient way to avoid the influence of the supporting layer on the contact angle. As shown in
Figure 1E, the angle reaches 144.8°. This result makes it clear that porous PVDF spheres are quasi-superhydrophobic.
Figure 1F illustrates the water contact angle on porous PVDF spheres supported by PLLA films, i.e., PVDF@PLLA. It exhibits a magnitude of 143.4°, which was similar to that of the porous spheres (
Figure 1E) but much higher than neat PLLA (
Figure 1D). The high WCA of porous PVDF spheres can be interpreted as follows: On one hand, PVDF itself is a well-known hydrophobic material, which has been widely used in water treatment [
27,
28,
29]. On the other hand, there is hierarchical roughness on the surface of porous PVDF spheres. The roughness in the former can be calculated according to the method shown in
Figure S2. In microns, roughness comes from the neighboring spheres (
Figure 1A,B) while there are porous structures in nanometers on each sphere (
Figure 1C). The combination of hydrophobic property and hierarchical roughness contributes to the quasi-superhydrophobicity. This is very similar to the well-known lotus leaves effect, in which there are numerous waxy bumps in microns and nanometers [
13,
16,
17]. In
Figure 1F, the composite PVDF@PLLA exhibits a similar contact angle with
Figure 1E. This result indicates that most of the PLLA film surface has been covered with porous PVDF spheres. It is difficult for water droplets to come into contact with PLLA, which is the reason for the resultant air-pockets and the consequent Cassie state [
30].
PLLA is a typical shape memory polymer, in which the amorphous matrix and tiny crystals of it play the role of the shape recovery phase and shape fixed phase, respectively. In this work, the crystallinity of PLLA is 3.6% (determined by DSC, data not shown here). The shape memory effect endows PLLA with the ability to be deformed at high temperatures and be fixed by cooling down, which has been investigated in detail in our previous work [
31,
32,
33]. The glass transition temperature of PLLA (63.4 °C, determined by means of dynamical mechanical analysis,
Figure S3) acts as the switching temperature of the shape memory effect. The surface morphology of the obtained composite film was observed by means of SEM. In
Figure 2, only typical SEM images have been shown since they play key roles in the transition between adhesive and anti-adhesive performances. After preparation, the whole surface of PLLA film has been covered by porous PVDF spheres (
Figure 2A), accounting for the high value of the water contact angle shown in
Figure 1F. This is the permanent shape of the composite film. In a 65 °C water bath (above the switching temperature of PLLA), the composite film was stretched to the draw ratio of 1.5 in a certain direction (defined as direction A) to obtain a temporary shape followed by cooling down to room temperature to fix it. To show the difference of distance among neighboring spheres in direction A and direction B, the software of Nano Measurer has been employed. The distance in direction A increases remarkably (>4 μm,
Figure 2B) while it is still comparable with that before deformation in the other direction (called direction B). The composite film goes from isotropic to anisotropic upon uniaxial tension. After that, two clamps were used to fix the edge of the composite film in direction A. Then, a secondary tension process was carried out along the edge in the other direction (direction B). This is so-called biaxial tension. Upon biaxial tension with a draw ratio of 1.5 in direction A and direction B, the distance of the neighboring spheres in two directions is comparable (
Figure 2C). That is to say, the composite film changes back to an isotropic state again. Of course, it is also facile to perform biaxial tension in another way, i.e., the tension in two directions simultaneously (from
Figure 2A to
Figure 2C directly). During uniaxial and biaxial tensions, porous PVDF spheres embedded on the PLLA film surface remain still while PLLA can be deformed. In this process, the covered area (defined as the area covered by porous PVDF spheres) remains almost constant. At the same time, the whole area of PLLA exhibits a much higher magnitude, leading to the higher area fraction of the exposed PLLA area (defined as the area which has not been covered by porous PVDF spheres,
Figure 2B,C). The quantitative analysis will be discussed in the following sections. Upon heating at 65 °C, the composite film recovers to its permanent shape in a relatively short period (
Video S1 and Figure S2) from either a uniaxial tension state (
Figure 2B) or biaxial tension state (
Figure 2C). In
Figure 2D, almost all the surface of composite PVDF@PLLA film has been covered by porous PVDF spheres again, which resembles so closely with that before deformation (
Figure 2A).
Upon uniaxial tension, the distances of PVDF porous spheres in two directions are different, suggesting the anisotropic composite film. Therefore, a series of uniaxial tensions with various draw ratios were carried out.
Figure 3A,B shows the contact and sliding angles during uniaxial tension. The original film surface exhibits a high contact angle (143°) and low sliding angle (37°,
Video S2), corresponding to the enhanced mobility, anti-adhesive performance and lotus leaves effect. In direction A (
Figure 3A), the contact angle decreases from 143° to 132° while the sliding angle increases from 37° to 90° (
Video S3) upon uniaxial tension (
Figure 3A). Here, 90° means that the droplets cannot roll down even when the specimen was placed vertically. The lower and higher magnitudes of contact angles and sliding angles indicate the adhesive state and rose petals effect. When the specimen is put into a water bath (65 °C), it recovers to the initial state upon thermal stimuli. Both contact angle and sliding angle are comparable with those in an as-prepared specimen. A similar thing happens in direction B. However, uniaxial tension produces higher sliding angles in direction A. The sliding angle difference between direction A and direction B increases with the increasing draw ratio. It is 5° and reaches 21° in the case of a draw ratio of 1.2 and 1.5, respectively. These results confirm that composite film exhibits anisotropic wettability after uniaxial tension. Biaxial tension yields isotropic wettability in two directions (
Figure 3C). The contact angle decreases to 135°, 133°, 132° with a draw ratio of 1.2, 1.3 and 1.5, respectively. At the same time, the sliding angles increase monotonously. Obviously, it changes from an anti-adhesive state (lotus leaves effect) to an adhesive state (rose petals effect). After recovery, the film surface goes back to the lotus leaves effect (i.e., low sliding angle). According to the discussion above, the original and deformed films exhibit the lotus leaves effect and rose petals effect, respectively. The transition between them can be repeated.
The reversible transition shown in
Figure 3 can be attributed to the exposed area fractions among porous PVDF spheres which are under the control of deformation and recovery of shape memory PLLA films. At the very beginning, the whole surface of PLLA films has been covered by PVDF spheres. The surface of the composite film exhibits the quasi-superhydrophobicity resulting from the hydrophobic property of PVDF and hierarchical roughness from neighboring spheres and narrow pores on each sphere (
Figure 1B,C). When water droplets contact the surface of composite films, they slip easily along the surface since there are numerous air pockets among spheres. The whole surface resembles lotus leaves so closely, on which there are hierarchical waxy dumps. This is the reason for the anti-adhesive state shown in
Figure 3. Upon uniaxial or biaxial tension, porous PVDF spheres remain still while the supporting PLLA film has been deformed. As a result, more and more area has been exposed to water droplets (
Figure 2B,C). The exposed area of the composite film surface was statistically analyzed using the Image J software. As shown in
Figure 3D, the exposed area fraction increases remarkably (from 7% to 36%) after stretching. The exposed PLLA film surface can be regarded as the hydrophilic defects since PLLA itself exhibits a water contact angle of 85.7° (
Figure 1D). On the composite film (PVDF@PLLA) surface, therefore, the increase of area fraction of the hydrophilic part contributes to the slightly lower contact angle and enhanced adhesive behaviors (higher sliding angles) shown in
Figure 3A–C. During the rolling-down of water droplets, it is the exposed PLLA surface (hydrophilic part) that prevents the continuous mobility of them. When the specimen is heated above the switching temperature of shape memory PLLA, the supporting film recovers to its permanent shape, resulting in the complete coverage of its surface by porous PVDF spheres again (<10% exposed area,
Figure 3D). It is difficult for water droplets to contact PLLA film due to the Cassie state on PVDF. In this case, the wettability and adhesion of composite film were determined by porous PVDF spheres. Then, the surface of the composite film switches back to the lotus leaves effect (
Figure 3A–C). During the transition discussed above, the Wenzel and Cassie states play key roles in determining the contact angle as well as sliding angles. The distance between hydrophobic PVDF spheres depends crucially on deformation. When the area of hydrophilic defect (i.e., exposed PLLA) is small, the repulsive effect of porous PVDF spheres is so strong that it is impossible for water droplets to come in contact with PLLA, corresponding to a Cassie state. In the case of a higher area fraction of hydrophilic defect, the water droplet can contact PLLA directly, producing a Wenzel state. In this work, therefore, the composite surface exhibit a mixed state of Cassie and Wenzel states because of the different diameters of PVDF spheres ranging from 2 to 15 μm and the hydrophilic defects with different exposed areas.
To show the anisotropic wettability clearly, our attention has been paid to the composite film before and after uniaxial tension (
Figure 4). On the as-prepared specimen, both contact angles and sliding angles in two directions are similar (143° and 37° respectively,
Figure 3A). Upon uniaxial tension with the draw ratio of 1.5, contact angles in direction A and direction B exhibit different magnitudes (132° and 135°, respectively,
Figure 3A and
Figure 4A). The sliding angles increase remarkably and are different in two directions. In direction B, it is 68° while the water droplet cannot move even when the specimen is placed vertically in direction A (i.e., 90°). Based on the difference in sliding angles in the two directions, the PVDF@PLLA composite film surface can be used for controlled droplet transportation. For this purpose, a specimen containing two regions has been prepared (
Figure 4B). In region one, the surface of the composite film is in the original (or recovered) state while it is stretched along the red arrow direction in region two. To achieve the droplet movement on the attained surface, the specimen was placed in two cases at a tilted angle of 70° (
Videos S4 and S5). This value is higher than 68° but lower than 90°. In case I, the water droplet exhibits mobility driven by gravity in region one since the original state corresponds to the lotus leaves effect. In region two, it is hard for it to move due to the enhanced adhesive performance resulting from the exposed hydrophilic defects of PLLA (
Figure 2B) and the resultant rose petals effect (
Figure 3). Consequently, the droplet has been captured. In case II, however, the droplet can pass the whole surface including two regions easily, which can be attributed to the lower sliding angles and lotus leaves effect (
Figure 3).