Next Article in Journal
Effect of Organic Polymers on Mechanical Property and Toughening Mechanism of Slag Geopolymer Matrix
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Thermo-Mechanical Properties of Sustainable Epoxy Polymer Networks Derived from Linseed Oil
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Production of Thermoplastic Starch-Aloe vera Gel Film with High Tensile Strength and Improved Water Solubility

Polymers 2022, 14(19), 4213; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194213
by Siti Fatma Abd Karim 1, Juferi Idris 1,2,*, Junaidah Jai 1, Mohibah Musa 1 and Ku Halim Ku Hamid 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Polymers 2022, 14(19), 4213; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194213
Submission received: 29 August 2022 / Revised: 12 September 2022 / Accepted: 23 September 2022 / Published: 8 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Characterization of Polymer Food Packaging Material)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Detailed recommendation:

Key words: please add: biodegradable film

In which year you made this experiment?

In how many repetition you made yours films?

What statistical methods were used?

Figure 8. Check units

Paragraph 3.10. Check references

Did the results differ statistically significantly?

Author Response

Dear Editor,

The coauthors and I greatly appreciated the reviewer's encouraging, critical, and constructive comments on this manuscript. The comments were highly detailed and beneficial in enhancing the manuscript. The manuscript has been revised as per the comments given by the reviewer.

Please see the attachment 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments to Authors

 Article “Production of thermoplastic starch-Aloe vera gel film with high tensile strength and improved water solubility” highlights the applications of aloe-vera gel in starch films formation. I think that authors should try to include a scientific discussion, include a clear comparison between samples (i.e., at least indicating the corresponding advantages), and write clearer conclusions. Different points must be considered before the paper can be considered for acceptance.

1. The Introduction needs to be improved. The background about starch films is insufficient and more references should be included in other suitable papers about starch film applications and characterization.

2. Add the justification in Introduction section why this study was conducted.

3. In section 2.2., justify why solid resin was used rather than direct gel.

4. Section 2.3 Characterization of Biodegradable Film; separate the methods with separate headings.

5.  To describe the range use lesser no first and larger number later (11-100% rather than 100-10%).

6. Maximum data is shown in figures, convert some data into Tables.

7. Also add the data for transmittance, which is very useful for deciding the role of films.

8. Conclusion is not informative; rewrite this section.

 

Author Response

Dear Editor,

The coauthors and I greatly appreciated the reviewer's encouraging, critical, and constructive comments on this manuscript. The comments were highly detailed and beneficial in enhancing the manuscript. 

Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Authors addressed all comments suggested by me. Now this manuscript may be accepted in this esteemed journal.

 

Back to TopTop