Next Article in Journal
Synthesis Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer Incorporated with SiC Sludge Using Design of Experiment Method
Next Article in Special Issue
New Bio-Based Polymer Sorbents out of Terpene Compounds or Vegetable Oils: Synthesis, Properties, Analysis of Sorption Processes
Previous Article in Journal
Ion-Selective Electrode Based on a Novel Biomimetic Nicotinamide Compound for Phosphate Ion Sensor
Previous Article in Special Issue
Crosslinked 4-Vinylpyridine Monodisperse Functional Microspheres for Sorption of Ibuprofen and Ketoprofen
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 14
Issue 16
10.3390/polym14163394
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of Metalorganic Copolymers Containing Various Contorted Units and Iron(II) Clathrochelates with Lateral Butyl Chains: Conspicuous Adsorbents of Lithium Ions and Methylene Blue

by
Suchetha Shetty
1,2,
Noorullah Baig
1,2,
Moustafa Sherief Moustafa
3,
Saleh Al-Mousawi
3 and
Bassam Alameddine
1,2,*
1
Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Gulf University for Science and Technology, West Mishref, Kuwait City 32093, Kuwait
2
Functional Materials Group, Gulf University for Science and Technology, West Mishref, Kuwait City 32093, Kuwait
3
Department of Chemistry, Kuwait University, Kuwait City 32093, Kuwait
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(16), 3394; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14163394
Submission received: 9 August 2022 / Revised: 16 August 2022 / Accepted: 17 August 2022 / Published: 19 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Permanently Porous Polymers)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We report the synthesis of three highly soluble metalorganic copolymers, TCP1–3, that were made from a one-pot complexation of iron(II) clathrochelate units that are interconnected by various thioether-containing contorted groups. TCP1–3 were converted into their poly(vinyl sulfone) derivatives OTCP1–3 quantitatively via the selective oxidation of the thioether moieties into their respective sulfones. All of the copolymers, TCP1–3 and OTCP1–3, underwent structural analysis by various techniques; namely, 1H- and 13C-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The copolymers were tested as potent lithium ions adsorbents revealing a maximum adsorption (qm) value of 2.31 mg g−1 for OTCP2. Furthermore, this same copolymer was found to be a promising adsorbent of methylene blue (MEB); an isothermal adsorption study divulged that OTCP2’s uptake of MEB from an aqueous solution (following the Langmuir model) was, at maximum adsorption capacity, (qm) of 480.77 mg g−1; whereas the kinetic study divulged that the adsorption follows pseudo second-order kinetics with an equilibrium adsorption capacity (qe,cal) of 45.40 mg g−1.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Click reactions have proven to be very useful in making a wide variety of functional materials as they afford the desired compounds in high yields from readily accessible reagents under mild reaction conditions and without requiring complex purification techniques since they do not generate many by-products [1,2]. Therefore, click chemistry has been increasingly employed for various applications, such as pharmaceuticals [3], cancer theranostics [4], nanomaterials [5], macrocyles [6], and polymers [7]. Thiol-based click reactions have gained growing interest and myriad chemistries have been developed; namely, thiol-ene and -yne [7,8], thiol-epoxy [9], thiol-isocyanate [10], and thiol-Michael addition reactions [11]. Among others, the thiol-yne click reactions are widely used in the synthesis of macromolecules for various applications [8,12,13]; for example, the synthesis of conjugated polymers [14], wherein electron-rich sulfur atoms tether the aromatic comonomers, has led to an improved level of electron mobility [15,16]. The sulfide units offer another advantage by allowing for their versatile oxidation into sulfones [17,18], thus affording highly polar polymers [19,20] which find applications in fuel cells [21,22,23,24], organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) [25,26], chemosensors [27], proton exchange membranes [28], and gas separation membranes [29].
The prevailing interest in lithium purification for the past two decades is mainly due to its extensive applications in cutting edge technologies, including batteries, catalysis, and nuclear energy [30,31]. Furthermore, lithium, the natural sources of which are scarce, is considered an essential component of future energy sources due to its superior electrochemical and physical properties when compared to other metals [32,33]. Hence, there have been growing numbers of attempts to extract lithium from brine and recycle it from used devices using myriad separation processes, such as solvent extraction, precipitation, electrochemistry, and adsorption. The latter of these methods is considered to be very promising, especially for the large-scale separation of lithium, because of the several advantages it represents, namely its versatility, eco-friendliness, and cost-effectiveness [34,35,36].
The pollution of fresh water resources has become a major environmental challenge due to the rapid rate of industrialization and the world’s growing population as the major contaminants which constitute a potential health threat to living organisms encompass dyes and pigments, heavy metal ions, organic solvents, antibiotics, and microbial species [37,38,39,40]. Organic dyes are the chief contributors to water pollution, this is caused by their discharge from various industrial sectors, such as those which handle fabric, plastic, printing, photography, paper-pulp, paint, and leather [41,42,43,44,45,46]. Methylene blue (MEB), a thiazine dye, is a common aromatic cationic dye which is carcinogenic [47,48] besides also causing various other health complications [49,50,51,52]. The removal of MEB from wastewater is thus critical and various techniques have been developed for this purpose, namely coagulation, sedimentation, chemical treatment, membrane filtration, and adsorption [53,54,55,56,57]. The latter of these is considered to be the most promising because it offers many upsides, mainly the versatile synthesis of various adsorbent materials and their efficacy [58,59,60,61].
Numerous clathrochelate complexes which bear a central metal ion that is encapsulated in three-dimensional organic bidentate ligands have been synthesized and tested as biosensors [62,63], catalysts for hydrogen generation [64,65], porous polymer adsorbents [66], semiconducting materials [67], organogels [68], and supramolecules [69,70,71,72] as well as metalorganic frameworks for gas separation and purification [73,74]. Recently, we have reported the synthesis of porous copolymers bearing iron(II) clathrochelate units that disclose prominent dye adsorption properties [75,76]. In this work, we explore the synthesis of three new thioether-containing iron(II) clathrochelate copolymers, TCP1–3, that were made from a one-pot synthesis process and which underwent subsequent selective oxidation into their sulfone copolymer derivatives OTCP1–3 before testing all of the copolymers as potent adsorbents. This testing revealed a maximum adsorption value of 2.31 mg g−1 and MEB removal properties reaching ~481 mg g−1 from an aqueous solution.

2. Materials and Methods

The chemical reactions reported herein were carried out under a positive flow of dry argon. The required 4-Mercaptophenylboronic acid and FeCl2 were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) while the butyl dioxime, 1,4-diethynyl-9,10-dihydro-9,10-[1,2] benzenoanthracene 1, 2,8-diethynyl-4,10-dimethyl-6,12-dihydro-5,11-methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]diazocine 2, and 2,7-diethynyl-9,9-dimethyl-9H-fluorene 3 were synthesized according to the procedures that have been reported in the literature [76,77,78,79]. The chemical reagents that were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) and HiMedia (Maharashtra, India) were used without further purification unless otherwise specified. The tetrahydrofuran (THF), dichloromethane (DCM), chloroform, acetone, diethyl ether, methanol, and hexane were dried over molecular sieves and deoxygenated by bubbling with argon for 30 min. The thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was done using silica gel 60 F254 deposited on aluminum sheets and revealed using a UV lamp. The NMR (1H: 600 MHz, 13C:150 MHz) spectra were recorded on a Bruker BioSpin GmbH 600 MHz spectrometer using CD2Cl2 and DMSO-d6 as solvents and tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal reference with the chemical shifts (δ) given in ppm. The FT-IR spectra were recorded on an Agilent Cary 630 FTIR instrument. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was recorded on a Shimadzu TGA-60H (Kyoto, Japan) analyzer in order to measure the thermal stability of the analytes up to 800 °C using a heating rate of 10 °C/min under an inert atmosphere of pure nitrogen. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data were recorded with a Thermo ESCALAB 250 Xi using a monochromatic Al Kα-radiation source (1486.6 eV) with a spot size of 850 μm. The spectral acquisition and processing were performed by employing Thermo Advantage software (Version 4.87). The base pressure in the XPS analysis chamber ranged between 10−10 and 10−9 torr. The analyzer was operated with a pass energy of 20 eV, dwell time of 50 min, and with a step size of 0.1 eV. Thermo (DFS) with a standard PFK (per-fluorokerosene) as its lock mass was used to obtain the electron impact high-resolution mass spectra (EI-HRMS). X-Calibur accurate mass calculation software was employed in order to convert the analyzed data to an accurate mass. The concentrations of Li+ before and after the adsorption by the polymers were recorded using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) instrument (Perkin-Elmer, Nexion 2000P). The molecular weights of the copolymers were determined using an Agilent 1260 infinity II gel permeation chromatograph (GPC) that was equipped with a refractive index (RI) detector using two columns (PL mixed-C), which were calibrated with twelve monodisperse polystyrene (PS) standards, and employing THF as an eluent at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1 at room temperature.

2.1. Synthesis

2.1.1. Synthesis of TC1 (Procedure A)

A Schlenk tube was charged with 1,4-diethynyl-9,10-dihydro-9,10-[1,2] benzenoanthracene 1 (0.2 g, 0.67 mmol, 1 eq.) and 4-mercaptophenylboronic acid (0.204 g, 1.32 mmol, 2 eq.) in a THF (10 mL). The reaction mixture was purged with argon and stirred overnight at 50 °C. The resulting solution was precipitated using hexane, affording a white solid (0.39 g, 96%) after filtration. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): δ 8.13 (brs, 4H, -OH), 7.84 (brm, 4H, ArH), 7.53–7.48 (m, 8H, ArH), 7.46–7.42 (m, 6H, ArH), 7.02–7.01 (brs, 2H, Vinylic-CH), 6.94–6.93 (brm,2H, vinylic-CH), 5.98 (s, 2H, triptycene-CH); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): δ 144.32, 145.44, 137.63, 135.60, 130.80, 128.42, 127.90, 125.58, 124.36, 117.06, 49.58; EI-HRMS: m/z calculated for (M•+) C30H28B2O4S2 610.1615 found 610.1609.

2.1.2. Synthesis of TC2

TC2 was prepared according to the method of Procedure A with 2,8-diethynyl-4,10-dimethyl-6,12-dihydro-5,11-methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]diazocine 2 (0.2 g, 0.67 mmol, 1 eq.) and 4-mercaptophenylboronic acid (0.206 g, 1.34 mmol, 2 eq.) in THF (10 mL). White solid (0.39 g, 95%); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): δ 8.06 (brs, 4H, -OH), 7.80–7.78 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.77–7.76 (m, 4H, ArH), 6.99 (s, 2H, ArH), 6.87 (s, 2H, ArH), 6.64 (br,2H, vinylic-CH), 6.55 (br, 2H, vinylic-CH), 4.53 (d, 2H, J = 12 Hz, methylene-CH), 4.26 (s, 2H, methylene-CH), 3.97 (d, 2H, J = 12 Hz, methylene-CH), 2.18 (s, 6H, methyl-CH); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): δ 145.63, 139.15, 135.03, 129.06, 128.01, 127.34, 126.63, 124.89, 123.64, 122.50, 119.62, 66.99, 54.37, 21.01; EI-HRMS: m/z calculated for (M•+) C33H32B2N2O4S2 606.1990 found 606.1984.

2.1.3. Synthesis of TC3

TC3 was prepared according to the method of Procedure A with 2,7-diethynyl-9,9-dimethyl-9H-fluorene 3 (0.2 g, 0.83 mmol, 1 eq.) and 4-mercaptophenylboronic acid (0.254 g, 1.65 mmol, 2 eq.) in THF (12 mL). White solid (0.42 g, 91%); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): δ 8.47 (brs, 4H, -OH), 7.82–7.68 (m, 8H, ArH), 7.49–7.42 (m, 6H, ArH), 7.34 (brm,2H, vinylic-CH), 6.81 (brm, 2H, Vinylic-CH), 1.48 (s, 6H, methyl-CH3); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): δ 148.82, 137.34, 135.11, 133.58, 132.72, 127.59, 125.96, 123.19, 120.24, 116.65, 46.35, 26.88; EI-HRMS: m/z calculated for (M•+) C31H28B2O4S2 550.1615 found 550.1610.

2.1.4. Synthesis of TCP1 (Procedure B)

TC1 (0.3 g, 0.49 mmol, 1 eq.), butyl dioxime (0.295 g, 1.47 mmol, 3 eq.), and iron(II) chloride (0.06 g, 0.49 mmol, 1 eq.) in chloroform (10 mL) were charged in a Schlenk tube under argon and refluxed for 48 h. The reaction mixture was dried by evaporating the solvent under reduced pressure and the resulting residue was extracted with DCM from the aqueous solution. The combined organic layer was washed with deionized H2O (100 mL X 3), concentrated, and hexane was added to precipitate the product which was isolated by filtration under vacuum and washed successively with hexane (20 mL), acetone (20 mL), and methanol (20 mL). Red solid (0.50 g, 86%); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): δ 7.66 (brs, 4H, ArH), 7.47 (brs, 10H, ArH), 7.00 (brs, 4H, ArH), 6.88–6.87 (br, 4H, vinylic-CH), 6.02 (s, 2H, triptycene-CH), 2.79 (brs, 12H, butyl-CH2), 1.49 (brs, 12H, butyl-CH2), 1.39 (brs, 12H, butyl-CH2), 0.88–0.86 (t, 18H, J = 12 Hz, butyl-CH3); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): δ 155.90, 144.93, 142.67, 132.31, 130.50, 129.00, 128.73, 128.32, 126.08, 125.07, 123.85, 116.34, 49.83, 28.24, 22.85, 22.47, 13.79; FTIR (KBr, cm−1): 3055 (aromatic =CH stretch.), 2958 (aliphatic -C-H stretch.), 1670 (C=N stretch.), 1592 (C=C stretch.), 1464 (aliphatic -C-H bend.), 818 (aliphatic -C-H bend.), and 701 (aliphatic C=C bend.); GPC (THF): Mw (g mol−1): 30198, Mn (g mol−1): 10066, Đ: 3.0.

2.1.5. Synthesis of TCP2

TCP2 was prepared according to the method of Procedure B with TC2 (0.2 g, 0.33 mmol, 1 eq.), butyl dioxime (0.198 g, 0.99 mmol, 3 eq.), and iron(II) chloride (0.04 g, 0.33 mmol, 1 eq.) in chloroform (6.5 mL). Red solid (0.33 g, 83%); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): δ 7.58 (brm, 4H, ArH), 7.33 (brm, 4H, ArH), 7.24 (brs, 2H, ArH), 7.01 (brm, 4H, vinylic-CH), 6.66 (brm, 2H, ArH), 4.56 (d, 2H, J = 12 Hz, methylene-CH), 4.34 (s, 2H, methylene-CH), 4.01 (d, 2H, J = 12 Hz, methylene-CH), 2.79 (brs, 12H, butyl-CH2), 2.36 (brs, 6H, methyl-CH) 1.49 (brs, 12H, butyl-CH2), 1.25 (brs, 12H, butyl-CH2), 0.81 (brs, 18H, butyl-CH3); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): δ 153.49, 142.95, 135.22, 132.89, 131.01, 128.55, 128.34, 112.38, 70.72, 59.70, 29.03, 26.85, 22.13, 17.27, 14.18; FTIR (KBr, cm−1): 3050 (aromatic =CH stretch.), 2958 (aliphatic -C-H stretch.), 1684 (C=N stretch.), 1592 (C=C stretch.), 1464 (aliphatic -C-H bend.), 805 (aliphatic -C-H bend.), and 739 (aliphatic C=C bend.); GPC (THF): Mw (g mol−1): 21404, Mn (g mol−1): 7493, Đ: 2.8.

2.1.6. Synthesis of TCP3

TCP3 was prepared according to the method of Procedure B with TC3 (0.2 g, 0.36 mmol, 1 eq.), butyl dioxime (0.155 g, 1.09 mmol, 3 eq.), and iron(II) chloride (0.046 g, 0.36 mmol, 1 eq.) in chloroform (7.3 mL). Red solid (0.36 g, 88%); 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): δ 7.82–7.79 (brm, 4H, ArH), 7.64 (brm, 4H, ArH), 7.49 (brm, 4H, ArH), 7.42 (brm, 2H, ArH) 7.35 (brm, 2H, vinylic-CH), 6.85 (brm, 2H, vinylic-CH), 2.80 (brs, 12H, butyl-CH2), 1.49 (brs, 18H, -CH2), 1.26 (brs, 12H, -CH2) 0.83 (brs, 18H, butyl-CH3); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): δ 157.83, 145.66, 137.95, 135.50, 133.01, 132.76, 127.61, 126.32, 125.14, 121.22, 118.63, 46.18, 29.03, 27.29, 26.89, 22.15, 14.20; FTIR (KBr, cm−1): 3055 (aromatic =CH stretch.), 2967 (aliphatic -C-H stretch.), 1688 (C=N stretch.), 1595 (C=C stretch.), 1468 (aliphatic -C-H bend.), 813 (aliphatic -C-H bend.), and 734 (aliphatic C=C bend.); GPC (THF): Mw (g mol−1): 21061, Mn (g mol−1): 6315, Đ: 3.3.

2.1.7. Synthesis of OTCP1 (Procedure C)

A solution of aqueous H2O2 (8 mL, 30 wt%) was added, dropwise, to a stirring suspension of TCP1 (0.1 g, 0.084 mmol) in acetic acid (6 mL) and the reaction mixture was heated at 50 °C for 1 h. The resulting red precipitate was filtered off and washed with deionized H2O (20 mL) and diethyl ether (20 mL) then dried under reduced pressure. Red solid (0.1 g, 96%).1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): δ 8.01 (brm, 8H, ArH), 7.54 (brm, 8H, ArH), 7.02 (brs, 6H, ArH and vinylic-CH), 5.95 (s, 2H, triptycene-CH), 2.79 (brs, 12H, butyl-CH2), 1.48 (brs, 12H, butyl-CH2), 1.22 (brs, 12H, butyl-CH2), 0.79 (brs, 18H, butyl-CH3); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): δ 157.49, 146.35, 144.29, 135.10, 132.12, 130.42, 129.97, 126.15, 125.42, 124.11, 123.53, 116.00, 48.20, 28.47, 26.34, 21.56, 13.59; FTIR (KBr, cm−1): 3055 (aromatic =CH stretch.), 2958 (aliphatic -C-H stretch.), 1670 (C=N stretch.), 1592 (C=C stretch.), 1464 (aliphatic -C-H bend.), 1314 (S=O stretch.), 1120 (S=O stretch), 818 (aliphatic -C-H bend.), and 701 (aliphatic C=C bend.); GPC (THF): Mw (g mol−1): 20017, Mn (g mol−1): 7056, Đ: 2.8.

2.1.8. Synthesis of OTCP2

OTCP2 was prepared following the method of Procedure C with TCP2 (0.1 g, 0.083 mmol), acetic acid (6 mL), and 30 wt% aq. H2O2 (8 mL). Red solid (0.1 g, 95%).1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): δ 7.79 (brs, 8H, ArH), 7.65–7.54 (brm, 4H, ArH), 7.33 (brs, 4H, vinylic-CH), 5.03 (brd, 2H, methylene-CH), 4.52 (brm, 4H, methylene-CH), 2.76 (brs, 12H, butyl-CH2), 2.27 (brm, 6H, methyl-CH) 1.49 (brs, 12H, butyl-CH2), 1.23 (brs, 12H, butyl-CH2), 0.77 (brs, 18H, butyl-CH3); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): δ 158.30, 146.82, 135.57, 130.94, 129.60, 127.70, 126.33, 124.75, 117.11, 71.76, 60.05, 29.03, 26.86, 22.11, 17.22, 14.14; FTIR (KBr, cm−1): 3050 (aromatic =CH stretch.), 2958 (aliphatic -C-H stretch.), 1684 (C=N stretch.), 1592 (C=C stretch.), 1464 (aliphatic -C-H bend.), 1314 (S=O stretch.), 1120 (S=O stretch.) 805 (aliphatic -C-H bend.), and 739 (aliphatic C=C bend.).

2.1.9. Synthesis of OTCP3

OTCP3 was prepared following the method of Procedure C with TCP3 (0.1 g, 0.088 mmol), acetic acid (6 mL), and 30 wt% aq. H2O2 (8.5 mL). Red solid (0.104 g, 98%).1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): δ 7.90 (brm, 16H, ArH and vinylic-CH), 6.97 (brm, 2H, vinylic-CH), 2.80 (brs, 12H, butyl-CH2), 1.48 (brs, 18H, -CH2), 1.24 (brs, 12H, -CH2), 0.81 (brs, 18H, butyl-CH3); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): δ 158.90, 146.10, 144.50, 139.22, 132.96, 130.45, 128.34, 127.14, 124.81, 122.58, 116.60, 46.49, 29.03, 26.90, 22.11, 14.17, 14.20; FTIR (KBr, cm−1): 3055 (aromatic =CH stretch.), 2967 (aliphatic -C-H stretch.), 1688 (C=N stretch.), 1595 (C=C stretch.), 1468 (aliphatic -C-H bend.),1311(S=O stretch.), 1121(S=O stretch.) 813 (aliphatic -C-H bend.), and 734 (aliphatic C=C bend.).

3. Results

3.1. Synthesis of Synthons TC1–3

Scheme 1 illustrates the thiol-yne click reaction conditions that were employed in order to synthesize the three diboronic acid synthons TC1–3 which were made by reacting each of the diethynyl starting materials 1–3 with 4-mercaptophenylboronic acid in THF at 50 °C overnight under argon. It is worth mentioning that nuclear magnetic resonance (1H- and 13C-NMR) and electron impact high resolution mass spectrometry (EI-HRMS) of the resulting products TC1–3 confirmed their formation in high purity (Figures S1–S3, S10–S12 and S19–S21 in the Supplementary Materials).

3.2. Synthesis of Copolymers TCP1–3

Scheme 2 reveals the reaction of an equimolar amount of FeCl2 with each of the synthons TC1–3 and three equivalents of butyl dioxime in refluxing chloroform under argon for 48 h which afforded the desired iron(II) clathrochelate copolymers TCP1–3 in high yields (83–88%). The presence of six butyl groups per iron(II) clathrochelate unit bestowed the copolymers with high solubility in various organic solvents such as DCM, chloroform, THF, and DMF, therefore allowing for their thorough structural analysis by 1H- and 13C- NMR besides the determination of the target copolymers’ molar mass by gel permeation chromatography (GPC). In addition, TCP1–3 were further analyzed by FTIR, TGA and XPS (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4, Figures S4–S6, S13–S15, S22–S27 and S31–S33 in the Supplementary Materials).

3.3. Synthesis of Copolymers OTCP1–3

The thioether groups of copolymers TCP1–3 underwent complete oxidation into their corresponding sulfone moieties. These transformations were achieved by reacting the former compounds with hydrogen peroxide in acetic acid at 50 °C for 1 h [80], which afforded the sulfone-containing copolymers OTCP1–3 (Scheme 3) in ~96% yield. The target copolymers were found to be sparingly soluble in DCM, chloroform, and THF. Their structures were confirmed by 1H- and 13C-NMR FTIR and XPS spectroscopy, besides determining the molar mass of OTCP1 by GPC since it is the only derivative which was soluble enough for this analytical technique (Figure 2, Figures S7–S9, S16–S18, S22–S24, S28–S30 and S33 in the Supplementary Materials).
Figure 1 illustrates the 1H-NMR spectrum of TCP1, where the chemical shifts at 7.66 ppm and 7.00 ppm (i.e., peaks a and c) are attributed to the eight aromatic protons of the thiophenyl boronate unit, whereas the ten aromatic protons that were detected at 7.47 ppm (c.f., Figure 1, peak b) are assigned to the triptycene unit. The characteristic chemical shifts that were observed at 6.88 ppm and 6.77 ppm are allocated to the four vinylic protons (c.f., Figure 1, peak d). Furthermore, the specific peak of triptycene’s sp3 protons was detected at 6.02 ppm (c.f., Figure 1, peak e). On the other hand, the peaks that were observed in the aliphatic region, namely at 2.79 ppm, 1.49 ppm, 1.39 ppm, and 0.88 ppm, are referred to the butyl side chains. The 1H-NMR spectra of TCP2 and 3 and OTCP1–3 reveal all of the chemical shifts proving their synthesis (Figures S1–S9 in the Supplementary Materials).
Figure 2 divulges the comparative FTIR absorption spectra of both the thioether-containing copolymer TCP1 and its derivative OTCP1 with sulfone units: the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibration peaks of the sulfone moiety (O=S=O) in OTCP1 were detected at 1314 cm−1 and 1120 cm−1, respectively, which strongly confirms the selective oxidation of the thioether units in TCP1 to their corresponding sulfonated groups in OTCP1 [18]. Furthermore, the stretching vibration bands of the aromatic =C-H groups of TCP1 and OTCP1 were observed at 3055 cm−1, whereas the stretching vibration peaks of their aliphatic –C–H groups were noticed at 2958 cm−1 [81]. Similarly, the absorption peak that was detected at 1670 cm−1 is referred to C=N groups stretching vibrations, whereas the one which appears at 1592 cm−1 is assigned to the aromatic C=C stretching vibrations. In addition, the bands that were observed at 1464 cm−1 and 818 cm−1 are ascribed to the aliphatic C-H groups bending vibrations, whereas the C=C bending vibrations of conjugated alkenes were detected at 701 cm−1. It is noteworthy that the target copolymers TCP2 and 3 and their derivatives OTCP2 and 3 also revealed distinctive peaks which signifies the success of their syntheses (Figures S22–S24 in the Supplementary Materials) [82,83,84].
The thermal stability of TCP1–3 was investigated by the means of thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) which portrayed a 10% weight loss temperature ranging from 136 °C to 271 °C. Nevertheless, the oxidation reaction of the hitherto mentioned copolymers into OTCP1–3, which bear stiffer poly(vinyl sulfone) units, led to relatively higher thermal stability thermograms as evidenced by their 10% weight loss temperatures the ranges of which were found between 269 °C and 299 °C (Figure 3).
The elemental composition of copolymers TCP1–3 and OTCP1–3 was explored by the use of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), the survey scan spectra of which corroborated the presence of all of the elemental peaks (Figures S25–S30 in the Supplementary Materials). Figure 4 portrays the XPS spectrum of TCP2, which confirms the existence of all of the constituents, i.e., carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, boron, sulfur, and iron [85]. The C1s peak of TCP2 can be fitted into two main binding energy values at ~284.67 eV and 285.36 eV, where the former corresponds to the aromatic carbon groups (C=C) and the latter relates to that of imine carbons (C=N). The binding energy that was detected at ~532.42 eV is assigned to oxygen that is bonded to boron and nitrogen. Additionally, the N1s spectrum exhibited two peaks at 399.36 eV and 400.68 eV, which can be correlated to the carbon–nitrogen (C-N) bonds of Tröger’s base and clathrochelate units, respectively. S2p was detected at 163.55 eV, thus denoting the presence of C-S [75]. On the other hand, The B1s spectra was found at 191.27 eV, which clearly divulges the presence of boron oxide (B-O) [86]. Figure 4 also reveals the XPS peak for Fe2p with binding energy values of 709.30 eV and 721.94 eV, which correspond to Fe(II)-N compounds [87]. Similarly, the target copolymers TCP1 and 3 disclosed conclusive XPS binding energy values, which undoubtedly prove their formation as well (Figures S7–S10 in the Supplementary Materials). It should be mentioned that, unlike TCP1–3, copolymers OTCP1–3 divulged two main binding energy values for oxygen; one at ~532.33 eV (which corresponds to oxygen that is bonded to boron and nitrogen) and a second peak at ~533.30 eV (which is assigned to oxygen that is bonded to sulfur) [88]. Furthermore, the S2p binding energy of copolymers TCP1–3 that was detected at ~163.50 eV [89] had shifted to 167.90 eV [88], which clearly confirms the complete oxidation of the thioether groups into their corresponding sulfone moieties in OTCP1–3 (Figures S25–S30 in the Supplementary Materials).
As can be noticed from Table 1, the good solubility of TCP1–3 and OTCP1 in polar organic solvents has allowed for the determination of their molar weights by gel permeation chromatography (GPC), disclosing a weight average molar mass (Mw) ranging from 20 kDa to 30 kDa and a number average molar mass (Mn) values varying between 6.3 kDa and 10 KDa. These results show a polydispersity index (PDI = Mw/Mn) in the range of 2.8 to 3.3 (Table 1 and Figures S31–S34 in the Supplementary Materials). Unfortunately, the scarce solubility of copolymers OTCP2 and 3 prevented the determination of their GPC chromatograms.

3.4. Copolymers’ Adsorption of Lithium Ions

The target copolymers TCP1–3 and OTCP1–3 were tested as lithium ion adsorbents by adding 5 mg of a given copolymer sample into a 5 mL aqueous solution of Li+ with an initial concentration 200 mg L−1 at ambient temperature, overnight. It is noteworthy that OTCP2 (i.e., the poly(vinyl sulfone) copolymer bearing Tröger base units) revealed the highest Li+ uptake capacity of 17.88 mg g−1, followed by OTCP3 and OTCP2 which displayed lithium ions adsorption capacities of 14.46 and 13.22 mg g−1, respectively. On the other hand, the poly(vinyl sulfide) compounds revealed lithium ion uptake capacities in the range of 3.93 to 9.12 mg g−1 (see Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials). These results suggest that the sulfone units bestow copolymers OTCP1–3 with a higher polarizability when compared to their poly(vinyl sulfide) synthons TCP1–3, thus leading to greater lithium ion uptake that is further improved when the copolymer backbone contains the bowl-shaped Tröger base units (i.e., in the case of OTCP2). Thus, in order to better understand the adsorption affinity towards lithium ions, the adsorption isotherm was studied by adding the latter copolymer into solutions with different initial concentrations of Li+ ranging from 10 to 300 mg L−1 at ambient temperature, overnight. The Li+ concentration in the solution was measured by ICP-MS after an adsorption equilibrium was reached and the equilibrium adsorption capacity of OTCP2 for lithium qe (mg g−1) was determined using the following equation:
qe·(mg g−1) = (Co − Ce)V/m,
where Co and Ce are the initial and equilibrium concentrations of the Li+ solutions (mg L−1), respectively, m (g) is the quantity of the adsorbent OTCP2 that was used, and V (L) is the volume of the Li+ solution [32].
As is shown in Figure 5, two isotherm models (Langmuir and Freundlich) were used to fit the experimental data. As can be noticed from Table 2, the correlation coefficient, R2, value of the Langmuir isotherm model was found to be equal to 0.9934, which is significantly higher than the value corresponding to the Freundlich isotherm model (0.9645). This, therefore, suggests that the Langmuir isotherm is more applicable to explaining the equilibrium data for the adsorption of lithium ions on adsorbent OTCP2. Accordingly, the maximum adsorption capacity (qm) that was computed from the Langmuir model for Li+ was found to be 2.31 mg g−1, which is promising when compared to several of the values that have been reported in the literature [90,91,92,93,94,95] (Table S2 in the Supplementary Materials). This is especially so when taking into account the versatile synthesis of the metalorganic copolymers that have been reported herein and the relative ease of making various derivatives from them in order to improve their lithium ion uptake.

3.5. Methylene Blue Adsorption Tests

Given its high Li+ adsorption capacity, OTCP2’s uptake performance was tested for another cationic species, methylene blue (MEB) dye, which is believed to be a primary source of water pollution [96,97,98]. OTCP2’s capacity to adsorb MEB was studied by stirring 5 mg of the former into a 5 mL aqueous solution of the latter dye (50 mg L−1) at ambient temperature and its concentration before and after adsorption was determined by the use of UV/Vis spectrophotometry (Figure 6). Figure 6 reveals that the OTCP2’s adsorption capacity for MEB from an aqueous solution attained a level of 87% in 60 min as proven by the sharp reduction in the latter characteristic maximum absorption peak that was detected at ~660 nm. The adsorption efficiency, E (%), and the quantity of MEB that was adsorbed by OTCP2, qe (mg g−1), were calculated using the following equations:
E (%) = (Co − Ce) /Co X 100,
qe (mg g−1) = (Co − Ce) V/m
where Co and Ce denote the initial and equilibrium MEB concentrations (mg L−1), respectively, m (g) is the amount of the adsorbent OTCP2 that was used, and V (L) is the volume of the MEB solution [75].
Furthermore, in order to explore the maximum adsorption capacity (qm) of MEB by OTCP2, adsorption isotherms experiments were carried out by preparing a series of aqueous solutions of MEB with initial concentrations ranging from 50 to 600 mg L−1. The Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models were utilized in order to fit the adsorption isotherm data that were determined for MEB. The following linear equation was applied for the Langmuir isotherm model:
1/qe = 1/KLqm X 1/Ce + 1/qm
The linear equation that was used for the Freundlich isotherm model was expressed as:
Log qe = Log KF + 1/n Log Ce
where qe (mg g−1) expresses the equilibrium adsorption capacity, Ce (mg L−1) denotes the dye concentration at equilibrium, and qm (mg g−1) is the maximum adsorption capacity. KL is the Langmuir constant whereas KF and n are the Freundlich constants that are correlated to the sorption capacity and sorption intensity, respectively [99].
Figure 7 portrays the Langmuir plot of 1/qe versus 1/Ce whereas the values of the Freundlich isotherm were determined from the plot of log qe versus log Ce. Both of these graphical representations were employed in order to fit the equilibrium data that were collected regarding MEB adsorption (Table 3). The correlation coefficient, R2, that was derived from the linear plot of the Langmuir model (R2 = 0.9988) was found to be higher than that which was computed from the Freundlich isotherm model (R2 = 0.9480) for the adsorption of MEB (Table 3 and Figure 7). This finding strongly implies that the Langmuir isotherm model is more favorable for its use to describe the equilibrium data, which suggests the homogenous adsorption and formation of an MEB monolayer on the adsorbent OTCP2. In addition, the maximum adsorption capacity (qm) that was extrapolated from the Langmuir model for MEB was found to be 480.77 mg g−1, which is, to the best of our knowledge, higher than the adsorption capacity values for several adsorbents that have been reported in the literature [100,101,102,103,104] (Table S3 in the Supplementary Materials). It is worthwhile to mention that the nonlinear fittings [105] of the parameters of both the Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm models did not afford better correlation coefficients (see Figure S36 in the Supplementary Materials).
The adsorption mechanism of MEB on OTCP2 was investigated by carrying out kinetic experiments using an initial MEB concentration of 50 mg L−1 at different time intervals. As can be noticed from Figure 6, the copolymer’s adsorption capacity for MEB increases sharply within the first 15 min and reached equilibrium in 60 min. Thus, to better understand the adsorption kinetics, pseudo first-order and pseudo second-order kinetic models were employed.
The pseudo first-order model is expressed by the following equation:
ln(qe − qt) = ln qe − k1t
The linear equation that is detailed below was employed in order to investigate the pseudo second-order model:
t/qt = t/qe + 1/k2qe2
where qe (mg g−1) and qt (mg g−1) are the adsorption capacities at equilibrium and time t (min), respectively. The variable k1 is the rate constant of the pseudo first-order model, whereas k2 is the rate constant of the pseudo second-order model [99].
As is shown in Figure 8, the calculated adsorption capacity at equilibrium, qe,cal, was obtained from the pseudo first-order model by plotting ln(qe – qt) versus t, whereas a plot of t/qt versus t was employed in order to determine qe,cal from the pseudo second-order model. Interestingly, the data that were compiled for both of the models in Table 4, below, reveal that the correlation coefficient, R2, that was derived from the linear correlation using the pseudo second-order model (R2 = 0.9919) is higher than the one that was derived from the pseudo first-order model (R2 = 0.4983). Moreover, Table 4 discloses the values of the experimental and calculated capacities at equilibrium, qe,exp and qe,cal, respectively, revealing a better agreement between the former value with that of the calculated capacity at equilibrium that was derived from the pseudo second-order model. This strongly suggests that that the adsorption of MEB by OTCP2 follows the pseudo second-order kinetic model wherein both the adsorbate and adsorbent contribute to the reaction and which rather follows the chemisorption mechanism [106].
Regeneration experiments were carried out in order to test the adsorbing performance of OTCP2 towards MEB after several adsorption–desorption cycles wherein the former was loaded with MEB and ultrasonicated in deionized water for 10 min. This was followed by its isolation by vacuum filtration over a membrane filter and this procedure was repeated for three successive times in order to ensure that OTCP2 was fully regenerated before adding it to a freshly prepared solution of MEB, as is described in Section 3.5. These tests were repeated for several cycles and they ultimately rendered a removal efficiency of 96%, even after three cycles (c.f. Figure S38 in the Supplementary Materials).

4. Conclusions

In summary, three highly soluble copolymers that are composed of iron(II) clathrochelate with lateral butyl chains and intercalated by various contorted units containing the thioether groups TCP1–3 were synthesized in a one-step reaction. Subsequently, the copolymers underwent selective oxidation of their thioether units into their corresponding sulfone derivatives, affording copolymers OTCP1–2 in excellent yields. Lithium ion adsorption tests of the target copolymers revealed the maximum adsorption capacity by OCTP2 of 2.31 mg g−1. Furthermore, OTCP2 disclosed excellent adsorption capacity for the cationic dye methylene blue (MEB) from an aqueous solution, it exhibited a maximum adsorption capacity (qm) of 480.77 mg g−1 (by following the Langmuir isotherm model). The kinetic study of MEB adsorption by OTCP2 suggested a pseudo second-order model disclosing an equilibrium adsorption capacity, qe,cal, of 45.40 mg g−1. Thus, the copolymers that are presented herein disclose several advantages in addition to their versatile and environmentally friendly synthesis, including their cost-effectiveness and superior stability. They have also been revealed to be promising adsorbents of lithium ions and methylene blue which qualify them as prominent adsorbents for water purification applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym14163394/s1, Figures S1–S9: 1H-NMR spectra of TC1-3, TCP1-3 and OTCP1-3; Figures S10–S18: 13C-NMR spectra of TC1-3, TCP1-3 and OTCP1-3; Figures S19–S21: EI-HRMS spectra of TC1-3; Figures S22–S24: Comparative FTIR spectra of TCP1-3 and OTCP1-3; Figures S25–S30: High-resolution XPS spectra of TCP1-3 and OTCP1-3; Figures S31–S34: Normalized GPC chromatogram of TCP1-3, OTCP1; Table S1: Summary of the Li+ adsorption by TCP1-3, OTCP1-3; Table S2: Comparison table for Li+ adsorption capacity of OTCP2 and various adsorbents published in the literature; Table S3: Comparison table for MEB adsorption capacity of OTCP2 and various adsorbents published in the literature; Figure S35: Nonlinear Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models of Li+ on OTCP2; Figure S36: Nonlinear Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models of MEB on OTCP2; Figure S37: Nonlinear Pseudo first- and second-order models of MEB on OTCP2; Figure S38: Regeneration tests results of OTCP2 to adsorb MEB.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.A.; methodology, B.A.; validation, S.S., N.B. and B.A.; formal analysis, S.S., N.B., M.S.M. and S.A.-M.; investigation, S.S. and B.A.; resources, B.A. and S.S.; data curation, S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S.; writing—review and editing, B.A.; visualization, S.S., N.B. and B.A.; supervision, B.A.; project administration, B.A.; funding acquisition, B.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences (KFAS) under project code PN18-14SC-03. The APC was funded by the Arab–German Young Academy of Sciences and Humanities (AGYA) that is funded under the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) grant 01DL20003. MSM and SM would like to acknowledge KFAS (project code PR17-14SC-02).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw/processed data that were required to reproduce these findings can be shared upon demand.

Acknowledgments

The project was partially supported by the Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences (KFAS) under project code PN18-14SC-03 and the Arab–German Young Academy of Sciences and Humanities (AGYA) that is funded under the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) grant 01DL20003. MSM and SM would like to acknowledge KFAS (project code PR17-14SC-02). We would like to thank the general facilities projects GS01/01, GS01/05, GS03/01, and GS03/08 at Kuwait University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guo, A.-D.; Wei, D.; Nie, H.-J.; Hu, H.; Peng, C.; Li, S.-T.; Yan, K.-N.; Zhou, B.-S.; Feng, L.; Fang, C.; et al. Light-induced primary amines and o-nitrobenzyl alcohols cyclization as a versatile photoclick reaction for modular conjugation. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Konuray, O.; Fernández-Francos, X.; De la Flor, S.; Ramis, X.; Serra, À. The Use of Click-Type Reactions in the Preparation of Thermosets. Polymers 2020, 12, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yoon, H.Y.; Lee, D.; Lim, D.-K.; Koo, H.; Kim, K. Copper-Free Click Chemistry: Applications in Drug Delivery, Cell Tracking, and Tissue Engineering. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2107192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wu, D.; Yang, K.; Zhang, Z.; Feng, Y.; Rao, L.; Chen, X.; Yu, G. Metal-free bioorthogonal click chemistry in cancer theranostics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 1336–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Luo, Y.; Cai, J.; Huang, Y.; Luo, J. Synthesis of Xylan-Click-Quaternized Chitosan via Click Chemistry and Its Application in the Preparation of Nanometal Materials. Molecules 2022, 27, 3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cicetti, S.; Maestre, E.; Spanevello, R.A.; Sarotti, A.M. Towards the Synthesis of Highly Hindered Pyrrolidines by Intramolecular AAC Click Reactions: What Can Be Learned from DFT Calculations? Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2022, 2022, e202200478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Geng, Z.; Shin, J.J.; Xi, Y.; Hawker, C.J. Click chemistry strategies for the accelerated synthesis of functional macromolecules. J. Polym. Sci. 2021, 59, 963–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Du, J.; Huang, D.; Li, H.; Qin, A.; Tang, B.Z.; Li, Y. Catalyst-Free Click Polymerization of Thiol and Activated Internal Alkynes: A Facile Strategy toward Functional Poly(β-thioacrylate)s. Macromolecules 2020, 53, 4932–4941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huang, Y.; Li, L.; Liu, X.; Li, Z. Photobase-catalysed anionic thiol-epoxy click photopolymerization under NIR irradiation: From deep curing to shape memory. Polym. Chem. 2022, 13, 3048–3052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Capperucci, A.; Petrucci, A.; Faggi, C.; Tanini, D. Click Reaction of Selenols with Isocyanates: Rapid Access to Selenocarbamates as Peroxide-Switchable Reservoir of Thiol-Peroxidase-Like Catalysts. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2021, 363, 4256–4263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sinha, J.; Podgórski, M.; Tomaschke, A.; Ferguson, V.L.; Bowman, C.N. Phototriggered Base Amplification for Thiol-Michael Addition Reactions in Cross-linked Photopolymerizations with Efficient Dark Cure. Macromolecules 2020, 53, 6331–6340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tang, J.; Yin, S.; Liu, X.; Kan, Z.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, M.; Tao, F.; Wang, F.; Li, C. Thiol-yne click reaction mediated photoelectrochemical detection of multi-sulfhydryl compounds based on diacetylene functionalized conjugated polymer. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 344, 130207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Daglar, O.; Luleburgaz, S.; Baysak, E.; Gunay, U.S.; Hizal, G.; Tunca, U.; Durmaz, H. Nucleophilic Thiol-yne reaction in Macromolecular Engineering: From synthesis to applications. Eur. Polym. J. 2020, 137, 109926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yao, B.; Mei, J.; Li, J.; Wang, J.; Wu, H.; Sun, J.Z.; Qin, A.; Tang, B.Z. Catalyst-Free Thiol–Yne Click Polymerization: A Powerful and Facile Tool for Preparation of Functional Poly(vinylene sulfide)s. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 1325–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Caron, E.; Wolf, M.O. Soluble Oligo- and Polythienyl Sulfides and Sulfones: Synthesis and Photophysics. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 7543–7549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Marrocchi, A.; Facchetti, A.; Lanari, D.; Santoro, S.; Vaccaro, L. Click-chemistry approaches to π-conjugated polymers for organic electronics applications. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 6298–6308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Matsumoto, Y.; Takasu, A. Synthesis of non-ionic poly(ester-sulfone) via low-temperature polycondensation for anode-selective electrophoretic deposition and subsequent photo cross-linking. Polym. J. 2018, 50, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Baig, N.; Shetty, S.; Moustafa, M.S.; Al-Mousawi, S.; Alameddine, B. Selective removal of toxic organic dyes using Tröger base-containing sulfone copolymers made from a metal-free thiol-yne click reaction followed by oxidation. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 21170–21178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Albada, B.; Keijzer, J.F.; Zuilhof, H.; van Delft, F. Oxidation-Induced “One-Pot” Click Chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 7032–7058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Geven, M.; d’Arcy, R.; Turhan, Z.Y.; El-Mohtadi, F.; Alshamsan, A.; Tirelli, N. Sulfur-based oxidation-responsive polymers. Chemistry, (chemically selective) responsiveness and biomedical applications. Eur. Polym. J. 2021, 149, 110387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rajangam, V.; Atchudan, R.; Kim, H.-J.; Yi, M. Recent Advancements in Polysulfone Based Membranes for Fuel Cell (PEMFCs, DMFCs and AMFCs) Applications: A Critical Review. Polymers 2022, 14, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Oroujzadeh, M.; Mehdipour-Ataei, S. Evaluation of properties and performance of poly(ether sulfone ketone) membranes in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2022, 16, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wijaya, F.; Woo, S.; Lee, H.; Nugraha, A.F.; Shin, D.; Bae, B. Sulfonated poly(phenylene-co-arylene ether sulfone) multiblock membranes for application in high-performance fuel cells. J. Membr. Sci. 2022, 645, 120203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kim, M.; Ko, H.; Nam, S.; Kim, K. Study on Control of Polymeric Architecture of Sulfonated Hydrocarbon-Based Polymers for High-Performance Polymer Electrolyte Membranes in Fuel Cell Applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kosai, J.; Masuda, Y.; Chikayasu, Y.; Takahashi, Y.; Sasabe, H.; Chiba, T.; Kido, J.; Mori, H. S-Vinyl Sulfide-Derived Pendant-Type Sulfone/Phenoxazine-Based Polymers Exhibiting Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence: Synthesis and Photophysical Property Characterization. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2020, 2, 3310–3318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jürgensen, N.; Kretzschmar, A.; Höfle, S.; Freudenberg, J.; Bunz, U.H.F.; Hernandez-Sosa, G. Sulfone-Based Deep Blue Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence Emitters: Solution-Processed Organic Light-Emitting Diodes with High Efficiency and Brightness. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 9154–9161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hirose, A.; Tanaka, K.; Yoshii, R.; Chujo, Y. Film-type chemosensors based on boron diiminate polymers having oxidation-induced emission properties. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 5590–5595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gomaa, M.; Sánchez-Ramos, A.; Ureña, N.; Pérez-Prior, M.; Levenfeld, B.; García-Salaberri, P.A. Characterization and Modeling of Free Volume and Ionic Conduction in Multiblock Copolymer Proton Exchange Membranes. Polymers 2022, 14, 1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Singh, S.; Varghese, A.M.; Reddy, K.S.K.; Romanos, G.E.; Karanikolos, G.N. Polysulfone Mixed-Matrix Membranes Comprising Poly(ethylene glycol)-Grafted Carbon Nanotubes: Mechanical Properties and CO2 Separation Performance. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021, 60, 11289–11308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xu, C.; Yu, T.; Peng, J.; Zhao, L.; Li, J.; Zhai, M. Efficient Adsorption Performance of Lithium Ion onto Cellulose Microspheres with Sulfonic Acid Groups. Quantum Beam Sci. 2020, 4, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vikström, H.; Davidsson, S.; Höök, M. Lithium availability and future production outlooks. Appl. Energy 2013, 110, 252–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liang, Q.; Zhang, E.-h.; Yan, G.; Yang, Y.-z.; Liu, W.-f.; Liu, X.-g. A lithium ion-imprinted adsorbent using magnetic carbon nanospheres as a support for the selective recovery of lithium ions. New Carbon Mater. 2020, 35, 696–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Martin, G.; Rentsch, L.; Höck, M.; Bertau, M. Lithium Market Research–Global Supply, Future Demand and Price Development. Energy Storage Mater. 2016, 6, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xu, Z.; Wang, X.; Sun, S. Performance of a synthetic resin for lithium adsorption in waste liquid of extracting aluminum from fly-ash. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2022, 44, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wahib, S.A.; Da’na, D.A.; Zaouri, N.; Hijji, Y.M.; Al-Ghouti, M.A. Adsorption and recovery of lithium ions from groundwater using date pits impregnated with cellulose nanocrystals and ionic liquid. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 421, 126657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lemaire, J.; Svecova, L.; Lagallarde, F.; Laucournet, R.; Thivel, P.-X. Lithium recovery from aqueous solution by sorption/desorption. Hydrometallurgy 2014, 143, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Singh, A.; Kaur, R.; Verma, S.; Singh, S. Antimicrobials and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Water Bodies: Pollution, Risk, and Control. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 830861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Delgado-González, C.R.; Madariaga-Navarrete, A.; Fernández-Cortés, J.M.; Islas-Pelcastre, M.; Oza, G.; Iqbal, H.M.N.; Sharma, A. Advances and Applications of Water Phytoremediation: A Potential Biotechnological Approach for the Treatment of Heavy Metals from Contaminated Water. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Elgarahy, A.; Al-wakeel, K.; Mohammad, S.; Shoubaky, G. A critical review of biosorption of dyes, heavy metals and metalloids from wastewater as an efficient and green process. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2021, 4, 100209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lashen, Z.M.; Shams, M.S.; El-Sheshtawy, H.S.; Slaný, M.; Antoniadis, V.; Yang, X.; Sharma, G.; Rinklebe, J.; Shaheen, S.M.; Elmahdy, S.M. Remediation of Cd and Cu contaminated water and soil using novel nanomaterials derived from sugar beet processing- and clay brick factory-solid wastes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 428, 128205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhou, Y.; Elchalakani, D.M.; Liu, H.; Briseghella, B.; Sun, C. Photocatalytic concrete for degrading organic dyes in water. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 39027–39040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, Y.; Yang, N.; Soldatov, M.; Liu, H. A novel phosphazene-based amine-functionalized porous polymer with high adsorption ability for I2, dyes and heavy metal ions. React. Funct. Polym. 2022, 173, 105235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Qiao, A.; Cui, M.; Huang, R.; Ding, G.; Qi, W.; He, Z.; Klemeš, J.J.; Su, R. Advances in nanocellulose-based materials as adsorbents of heavy metals and dyes. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 272, 118471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rafiq, A.; Ikram, M.; Ali, S.; Niaz, F.; Khan, M.; Khan, Q.; Maqbool, M. Photocatalytic degradation of dyes using semiconductor photocatalysts to clean industrial water pollution. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2021, 97, 111–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kumar, Y.; Rani, S.; Shabir, J.; Kumar, L.S. Nitrogen-Rich and Porous Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanosheet-Immobilized Palladium Nanoparticles as Highly Active and Recyclable Catalysts for the Reduction of Nitro Compounds and Degradation of Organic Dyes. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 13250–13258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Baig, N.; Shetty, S.; Al-Mousawi, S.; Alameddine, B. Conjugated microporous polymers using a copper-catalyzed [4 + 2] cyclobenzannulation reaction: Promising materials for iodine and dye adsorption. Polym. Chem. 2021, 12, 2282–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Khare, P.; Singh, A.; Verma, S.; Bhati, A.; Sonker, A.K.; Tripathi, K.M.; Sonkar, S.K. Sunlight-Induced Selective Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue in Bacterial Culture by Pollutant Soot Derived Nontoxic Graphene Nanosheets. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 579–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nedu, M.-E.; Tertis, M.; Cristea, C.; Georgescu, A.V. Comparative Study Regarding the Properties of Methylene Blue and Proflavine and Their Optimal Concentrations for In Vitro and In Vivo Applications. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Manippady, S.R.; Singh, A.; Basavaraja, B.M.; Samal, A.K.; Srivastava, S.; Saxena, M. Iron–Carbon Hybrid Magnetic Nanosheets for Adsorption-Removal of Organic Dyes and 4-Nitrophenol from Aqueous Solution. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 1571–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Khan, I.; Saeed, K.; Zekker, I.; Zhang, B.; Hendi, A.H.; Ahmad, A.; Ahmad, S.; Zada, N.; Ahmad, H.; Shah, L.A.; et al. Review on Methylene Blue: Its Properties, Uses, Toxicity and Photodegradation. Water 2022, 14, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dabholkar, N.; Gorantla, S.; Dubey, S.K.; Alexander, A.; Taliyan, R.; Singhvi, G. Repurposing methylene blue in the management of COVID-19: Mechanistic aspects and clinical investigations. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 142, 112023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Porizka, M.; Kopecky, P.; Dvorakova, H.; Kunstyr, J.; Lips, M.; Michalek, P.; Balik, M. Methylene blue administration in patients with refractory distributive shock-A retrospective study. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ihaddaden, S.; Aberkane, D.; Boukerroui, A.; Robert, D. Removal of methylene blue (basic dye) by coagulation-flocculation with biomaterials (bentonite and Opuntia ficus indica). J. Water Process Eng. 2022, 49, 102952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Adel, M.; Ahmed, M.A.; Elabiad, M.A.; Mohamed, A.A. Removal of heavy metals and dyes from wastewater using graphene oxide-based nanomaterials: A critical review. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2022, 18, 100719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Al-Wasidi, A.S.; AlZahrani, I.I.S.; Naglah, A.M.; El-Desouky, M.G.; Khalil, M.A.; El-Bindary, A.A.; El-Bindary, M.A. Effective Removal of Methylene Blue From Aqueous Solution Using Metal-Organic Framework; Modelling Analysis, Statistical Physics Treatment and DFT Calculations. ChemistrySelect 2021, 6, 11431–11447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kenawy, E.-R.; Tenhu, H.; Khattab, S.A.; Eldeeb, A.A.; Azaam, M.M. Highly efficient adsorbent material for removal of methylene blue dye based on functionalized polyacrylonitrile. Eur. Polym. J. 2022, 169, 111138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tarekegn, M.M.; Balakrishnan, R.M.; Hiruy, A.M.; Dekebo, A.H. Removal of methylene blue dye using nano zerovalent iron, nanoclay and iron impregnated nanoclay–A comparative study. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 30109–30131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, F.; Liu, J.; Liu, W.; Xu, Y.; Cao, Y.; Chen, B.; Xu, M. Preparation of hyper-cross-linked hydroxylated polystyrene for adsorptive removal of methylene blue. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 25551–25560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Han, Q.; Wang, J.; Goodman, B.A.; Xie, J.; Liu, Z. High adsorption of methylene blue by activated carbon prepared from phosphoric acid treated eucalyptus residue. Powder Technol. 2020, 366, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Georgin, J.; Franco, D.S.P.; Netto, M.S.; Allasia, D.; Oliveira, M.L.S.; Dotto, G.L. Treatment of water containing methylene by biosorption using Brazilian berry seeds (Eugenia uniflora). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 20831–20843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pang, X.; Sellaoui, L.; Franco, D.; Netto, M.S.; Georgin, J.; Luiz Dotto, G.; Abu Shayeb, M.K.; Belmabrouk, H.; Bonilla-Petriciolet, A.; Li, Z. Preparation and characterization of a novel mountain soursop seeds powder adsorbent and its application for the removal of crystal violet and methylene blue from aqueous solutions. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 391, 123617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Losytskyy, M.; Chornenka, N.; Vakarov, S.; Meier-Menches, S.M.; Gerner, C.; Potocki, S.; Arion, V.B.; Gumienna-Kontecka, E.; Voloshin, Y.; Kovalska, V. Sensing of Proteins by ICD Response of Iron(II) Clathrochelates Functionalized by Carboxyalkylsulfide Groups. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Selin, R.O.; Klemt, I.; Chernii, V.Y.; Losytskyy, M.Y.; Chernii, S.; Mular, A.; Gumienna-Kontecka, E.; Kovalska, V.B.; Voloshin, Y.Z.; Vologzhanina, A.V.; et al. Synthesis and spectral characterization of the first fluorescein-tagged iron(ii) clathrochelates, their supramolecular interactions with globular proteins, and cellular uptake. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 8163–8177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Varzatskii, O.A.; Oranskiy, D.A.; Vakarov, S.V.; Chornenka, N.V.; Belov, A.S.; Vologzhanina, A.V.; Pavlov, A.A.; Grigoriev, S.A.; Pushkarev, A.S.; Millet, P.; et al. Hydrogen production with a designed clathrochelate-based electrocatalytic materials: Synthesis, X-ray structure and redox-properties of the iron cage complexes with pendant (poly)aryl-terminated ribbed substituents. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2017, 42, 27894–27909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Voloshin, Y.Z.; Buznik, V.M.; Dedov, A.G. New types of the hybrid functional materials based on cage metal complexes for (electro) catalytic hydrogen production. Pure Appl. Chem. 2020, 92, 1159–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Alameddine, B.; Shetty, S.; Baig, N.; Al-Mousawi, S.; Al-Sagheer, F. Synthesis and characterization of metalorganic polymers of intrinsic microporosity based on iron(II) clathrochelate. Polymer 2017, 122, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zlobin, I.S.; Aisin, R.R.; Novikov, V.V. Iron(II) Clathrochelates in Molecular Spintronic Devices: A Vertical Spin Valve. Russ. J. Coord. Chem. 2022, 48, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Alameddine, B.; Shetty, S.; Anju, R.S.; Al-Sagheer, F.; Al-Mousawi, S. Highly soluble metal-organic polymers based on iron(II) clathrochelates and their gelation induced by sonication. Eur. Polym. J. 2017, 95, 566–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jansze, S.M.; Severin, K. Clathrochelate Metalloligands in Supramolecular Chemistry and Materials Science. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 2139–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Antipin, I.; Alfimov, M.; Arslanov, V.; Burilov, V.; Vatsadze, S.; Voloshin, Y.; Volcho, K.; Gorbatchuk, V.; Gorbunova, Y.; Gromov, S.; et al. Functional supramolecular systems: Design and applications. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2021, 90, 895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cecot, G.; Alameddine, B.; Prior, S.; Zorzi, R.D.; Geremia, S.; Scopelliti, R.; Fadaei, F.T.; Solari, E.; Severin, K. Large heterometallic coordination cages with gyrobifastigium-like geometry. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 11243–11246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Cecot, G.; Marmier, M.; Geremia, S.; Zorzi, R.D.; Vologzhanina, A.V.; Pattison, P.; Solari, E.; Tirani, F.F.; Scopelliti, R.; Severin, K. The Intricate Structural Chemistry of MII2nLn-Type Assemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 39, 8371–8381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Gong, W.; Xie, Y.; Pham, T.D.; Shetty, S.; Son, F.A.; Idrees, K.B.; Chen, Z.; Xie, H.; Liu, Y.; Snurr, R.Q.; et al. Creating Optimal Pockets in a Clathrochelate-Based Metal–Organic Framework for Gas Adsorption and Separation: Experimental and Computational Studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 3737–3745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Chen, Z.; Idrees, K.B.; Shetty, S.; Xie, H.; Wasson, M.C.; Gong, W.; Zhang, X.; Alameddine, B.; Farha, O.K. Regulation of Catenation in Metal–Organic Frameworks with Tunable Clathrochelate-Based Building Blocks. Cryst. Growth Des. 2021, 21, 6665–6670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Shetty, S.; Baig, N.; Al-Mousawi, S.; Alameddine, B. Removal of anionic and cationic dyes using porous copolymer networks made from a Sonogashira cross-coupling reaction of diethynyl iron (II) clathrochelate with various arylamines. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2022, published online, e52966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Shetty, S.; Baig, N.; Hassan, A.; Al-Mousawi, S.; Das, N.; Alameddine, B. Fluorinated Iron(ii) clathrochelate units in metalorganic based copolymers: Improved porosity, iodine uptake, and dye adsorption properties. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 14986–14995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shetty, S.; Baig, N.; Moustafa, M.S.; Al-Mousawi, S.; Alameddine, B. Sizable iodine uptake of porous copolymer networks bearing Tröger’s base units. Polymer 2021, 229, 123996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Baig, N.; Shetty, S.; Al-Mousawi, S.; Al-Sagheer, F.; Alameddine, B. Synthesis of triptycene-derived covalent organic polymer networks and their subsequent in-situ functionalization with 1,2-dicarbonyl substituents. React. Funct. Polym. 2019, 139, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Alameddine, B.; Baig, N.; Shetty, S.; Al-Sagheer, F.; Al-Mousawi, S. Microwave-Assisted [4+2] Diels–Alder Cycloaddition of 1,4-Diethynyl Triptycene with Various Cyclopentadienone Derivatives: Promising Building Blocks for Polymer Networks. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2018, 7, 378–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Alameddine, B.; Baig, N.; Shetty, S.; Al-Mousawi, S.; Al-Sagheer, F. Triptycene-containing Poly(vinylene sulfone) derivatives from a metal-free thiol-yne click polymerization followed by a mild oxidation reaction. Polymer 2018, 154, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Slaný, M.; Jankovič, L.; Madejová, J. Near-IR study of the impact of alkyl-ammonium and -phosphonium cations on the hydration of montmorillonite. J. Mol. Struct. 2022, 1256, 132568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liu, M.; Yao, C.; Liu, C.; Xu, Y. Thiophene-based porous organic networks for volatile iodine capture and effectively detection of mercury ion. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Yao, C.; Li, G.; Wang, J.; Xu, Y.; Chang, L. Template-free synthesis of porous carbon from triazine based polymers and their use in iodine adsorption and CO2 capture. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Fuente, E.; Menéndez, J.A.; Díez, M.A.; Suárez, D.; Montes-Morán, M.A. Infrared Spectroscopy of Carbon Materials:  A Quantum Chemical Study of Model Compounds. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 6350–6359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Shetty, S.; Baig, N.; Al-Mousawi, S.; Al-Sagheer, F.; Alameddine, B. Synthesis of secondary arylamine copolymers with Iron(II) clathrochelate units and their functionalization into tertiary Polyarylamines via Buchwald-Hartwig cross-coupling reaction. Polymer 2019, 178, 121606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Bai, H.; Xue, C.; Lyu, J.L.; Li, J.; Chen, G.X.; Yu, J.H.; Lin, C.T.; Lv, D.J.; Xiong, L.M. Thermal conductivity and mechanical properties of flake graphite/copper composite with a boron carbide-boron nano-layer on graphite surface. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2018, 106, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Baig, N.; Shetty, S.; Al-Mousawi, S.; Al-Sagheer, F.; Alameddine, B. Influence of size and nature of the aryl diborate spacer on the intrinsic microporosity of Iron(II) clathrochelate polymers. Polymer 2018, 151, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Louette, P.; Bodino, F.; Pireaux, J.J. Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) XPS Reference Core Level and Energy Loss Spectra. Surf. Sci. Spectra 2005, 12, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Castner, D.G.; Hinds, K.; Grainger, D.W. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Sulfur 2p Study of Organic Thiol and Disulfide Binding Interactions with Gold Surfaces. Langmuir 1996, 12, 5083–5086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Xu, X.; Li, Y.; Yang, D.; Zheng, X.; Wang, Y.; Pan, J.; Zhang, T.; Xu, J.; Qiu, F.; Yan, Y.; et al. A facile strategy toward ion-imprinted hierarchical mesoporous material via dual-template method for simultaneous selective extraction of lithium and rubidium. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 171, 264–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Torrejos, R.E.C.; Nisola, G.M.; Park, M.J.; Shon, H.K.; Seo, J.G.; Koo, S.; Chung, W.-J. Synthesis and characterization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes-supported dibenzo-14-crown-4 ether with proton ionizable carboxyl sidearm as Li+ adsorbents. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 264, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ding, T.; Wu, Q.; Nie, Z.; Zheng, M.; Wang, Y.; Yang, D. Selective recovery of lithium resources in salt lakes by polyacrylonitrile/ion-imprinted polymer: Synthesis, testing, and computation. Polym. Test. 2022, 113, 107647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ding, T.; Zheng, M.; Lin, Y. Adsorption of Li(I) Ions through New High-Performance Electrospun PAN/Kaolin Nanofibers: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Calculation. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 11430–11439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Huang, W.; Liu, S.; Liu, J.; Zhang, W.; Pan, J. 2-Methylol-12-crown-4 ether immobilized PolyHIPEs toward recovery of lithium(i). New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 16814–16822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Hong, H.-J.; Ryu, T.; Park, I.-S.; Kim, M.; Shin, J.; Kim, B.-G.; Chung, K.-S. Highly porous and surface-expanded spinel hydrogen manganese oxide (HMO)/Al2O3 composite for effective lithium (Li) recovery from seawater. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 337, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Rosly, N.Z.; Abdullah, A.H.; Ahmad Kamarudin, M.; Ashari, S.E.; Alang Ahmad, S.A. Adsorption of Methylene Blue Dye by Calix[6]Arene-Modified Lead Sulphide (Pbs): Optimisation Using Response Surface Methodology. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hongo, T.; Moriura, M.; Hatada, Y.; Abiko, H. Simultaneous Methylene Blue Adsorption and pH Neutralization of Contaminated Water by Rice Husk Ash. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 21604–21612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Yang, Y.; Yu, W.; He, S.; Yu, S.; Chen, Y.; Lu, L.; Shu, Z.; Cui, H.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, H. Rapid adsorption of cationic dye-methylene blue on the modified montmorillonite/graphene oxide composites. Appl. Clay Sci. 2019, 168, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Dhar, L.; Hossain, S.; Rahman, M.S.; Quraishi, S.B.; Saha, K.; Rahman, F.; Rahman, M.T. Adsorption Mechanism of Methylene Blue by Graphene Oxide-Shielded Mg–Al-Layered Double Hydroxide from Synthetic Wastewater. J. Phys. Chem. A 2021, 125, 954–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wei, S.; Wu, J.; Chen, P.; Fu, B.; Zhu, X.; Chen, M. Integration of Phosphotungstic Acid into Zeolitic Imidazole Framework-67 for Efficient Methylene Blue Adsorption. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 9900–9908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Baig, N.; Shetty, S.; Pasha, S.S.; Pramanik, S.K.; Alameddine, B. Copolymer networks with contorted units and highly polar groups for ultra-fast selective cationic dye adsorption and iodine uptake. Polymer 2022, 239, 124467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Xu, W.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Du, Q.; Li, M.; Sun, Y.; Cui, M.; Li, L. Study on the Adsorption Performance of Casein/Graphene Oxide Aerogel for Methylene Blue. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 29243–29253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Trinh, T.; Phuong, T.; Xuan, N.; Nguyet, D.M.; Quan, T.H.; Anh, T.N.M.; Thinh, D.B.; Tai, L.T.; Lan, N.T.; Trinh, D.N.; et al. Preparing three-dimensional graphene aerogels by chemical reducing method: Investigation of synthesis condition and optimization of adsorption capacity of organic dye. Surf. Interfaces 2021, 23, 101023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Wang, Z.; Song, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.-F.; Yao, J. Construction of a hybrid graphene oxide/nanofibrillated cellulose aerogel used for the efficient removal of methylene blue and tetracycline. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2021, 150, 109839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Cassol, G.O.; Gallon, R.; Schwaab, M.; Barbosa-Coutinho, E.; Júnior, J.B.S.; Pinto, J.C. Statistical Evaluation of Non-Linear Parameter Estimation Procedures for Adsorption Equilibrium Models. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2014, 32, 257–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Xiao, Y.; Azaiez, J.; Hill, J.M. Erroneous Application of Pseudo-Second-Order Adsorption Kinetics Model: Ignored Assumptions and Spurious Correlations. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 2705–2709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 14 03394 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of synthons TC1–3.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of synthons TC1–3.
Polymers 14 03394 sch001
Polymers 14 03394 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Synthesis of copolymers TCP1–3.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of copolymers TCP1–3.
Polymers 14 03394 sch002
Polymers 14 03394 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Synthesis of copolymers OTCP1–3.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of copolymers OTCP1–3.
Polymers 14 03394 sch003
Polymers 14 03394 g001 550
Figure 1. 1H-NMR spectrum of TCP1.
Figure 1. 1H-NMR spectrum of TCP1.
Polymers 14 03394 g001
Polymers 14 03394 g002 550
Figure 2. Comparative FTIR spectrum of TCP1 (up) and OTCP1 (down).
Figure 2. Comparative FTIR spectrum of TCP1 (up) and OTCP1 (down).
Polymers 14 03394 g002
Polymers 14 03394 g003 550
Figure 3. TGA thermograms of copolymers TCP1–3 (a) and OTCP1–3 (b), Td represents the temperature of 10% weight loss.
Figure 3. TGA thermograms of copolymers TCP1–3 (a) and OTCP1–3 (b), Td represents the temperature of 10% weight loss.
Polymers 14 03394 g003
Polymers 14 03394 g004 550
Figure 4. High-resolution survey scan XPS spectra of C1s, O1s, N1s, S2p, Fe2p, and B1s of TCP2.
Figure 4. High-resolution survey scan XPS spectra of C1s, O1s, N1s, S2p, Fe2p, and B1s of TCP2.
Polymers 14 03394 g004
Polymers 14 03394 g005 550
Figure 5. Langmuir isotherm (a) and Freundlich isotherm (b) models of Li+ on OTCP2.
Figure 5. Langmuir isotherm (a) and Freundlich isotherm (b) models of Li+ on OTCP2.
Polymers 14 03394 g005
Polymers 14 03394 g006 550
Figure 6. UV–Vis absorption spectrum of MEB aqueous solution (50 mg L−1) in the presence of OTCP2 at various time intervals (inset: samples photos disclosing the color change after dye adsorption).
Figure 6. UV–Vis absorption spectrum of MEB aqueous solution (50 mg L−1) in the presence of OTCP2 at various time intervals (inset: samples photos disclosing the color change after dye adsorption).
Polymers 14 03394 g006
Polymers 14 03394 g007 550
Figure 7. Langmuir isotherm (a) and Freundlich isotherm (b) models of MEB on OTCP2.
Figure 7. Langmuir isotherm (a) and Freundlich isotherm (b) models of MEB on OTCP2.
Polymers 14 03394 g007
Polymers 14 03394 g008 550
Figure 8. Pseudo first-order (a) and pseudo second-order (b) models of MEB on OTCP2.
Figure 8. Pseudo first-order (a) and pseudo second-order (b) models of MEB on OTCP2.
Polymers 14 03394 g008
Table
Table 1. Summary of the GPC results of the copolymers TCP1–3 and OTCP1.
Table 1. Summary of the GPC results of the copolymers TCP1–3 and OTCP1.
EntryPolymerMw (g·mol−1)Mn (g·mol−1)Đ
1TCP130198100663.0
2TCP22140474932.8
3TCP32106163153.3
4OTCP12001770562.8
Table
Table 2. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm model parameters for Li+ adsorption on OTCP2.
Table 2. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm model parameters for Li+ adsorption on OTCP2.
Ion on
OTCP2		Langmuir Isotherm ParametersFreundlich Isotherm Parameters
qm (mg g−1)KLR21/nKFR2
Li+2.310.016910.99341.33020.16050.9645
Table
Table 3. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm model parameters for MEB adsorption on OTCP2.
Table 3. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm model parameters for MEB adsorption on OTCP2.
Dye on OTCP2Langmuir Isotherm ParametersFreundlich Isotherm Parameters
qm (mg g−1)KLR21/nKFR2
MEB480.770.015080.99880.61363.32110.9480
Table
Table 4. Pseudo first-order and pseudo second-order kinetic model parameters for the adsorption MEB on OTCP2.
Table 4. Pseudo first-order and pseudo second-order kinetic model parameters for the adsorption MEB on OTCP2.
Dye on
OTCP2		 Pseudo 1st Order ModelPseudo 2nd Order Model
Co
(mg L−1) 		qe,exp
(mg g−1) 		qe,cal
(mg g−1) 		k1
(min−1)		R2qe,cal
(mg g−1)		k2
(min−1)		R2
MEB5043.418.88−0.0010.498345.400.00690.9919
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shetty, S.; Baig, N.; Moustafa, M.S.; Al-Mousawi, S.; Alameddine, B. Synthesis of Metalorganic Copolymers Containing Various Contorted Units and Iron(II) Clathrochelates with Lateral Butyl Chains: Conspicuous Adsorbents of Lithium Ions and Methylene Blue. Polymers 2022, 14, 3394. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14163394

AMA Style

Shetty S, Baig N, Moustafa MS, Al-Mousawi S, Alameddine B. Synthesis of Metalorganic Copolymers Containing Various Contorted Units and Iron(II) Clathrochelates with Lateral Butyl Chains: Conspicuous Adsorbents of Lithium Ions and Methylene Blue. Polymers. 2022; 14(16):3394. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14163394

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shetty, Suchetha, Noorullah Baig, Moustafa Sherief Moustafa, Saleh Al-Mousawi, and Bassam Alameddine. 2022. "Synthesis of Metalorganic Copolymers Containing Various Contorted Units and Iron(II) Clathrochelates with Lateral Butyl Chains: Conspicuous Adsorbents of Lithium Ions and Methylene Blue" Polymers 14, no. 16: 3394. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14163394

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop