Next Article in Journal
Advanced “Green” Prebiotic Composite of Bacterial Cellulose/Pullulan Based on Synthetic Biology-Powered Microbial Coculture Strategy
Next Article in Special Issue
κ-Carrageenan Hydrogel as a Matrix for Therapeutic Enzyme Immobilization
Previous Article in Journal
In Vivo Bone Tissue Engineering Strategies: Advances and Prospects
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Novel Immobilized Biocatalysts Based on Cysteine Proteases Bound to 2-(4-Acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) Chitosan and Research on Their Structural Features

by
Svetlana S. Olshannikova
1,
Nataliya V. Malykhina
1,
Maria S. Lavlinskaya
1,2,
Andrey V. Sorokin
1,2,3,
Nikolay E. Yudin
3,
Yulia M. Vyshkvorkina
4,
Anatoliy N. Lukin
5,*,
Marina G. Holyavka
1,6,* and
Valeriy G. Artyukhov
1
1
Biophysics and Biotechnology Department, Voronezh State University, 394018 Voronezh, Russia
2
Metagenomics and Food Biotechnologies Laboratory, Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies, 394036 Voronezh, Russia
3
Polymer Science and Colloid Chemistry Department, Voronezh State University, 394018 Voronezh, Russia
4
Phystech School of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 141701 Dolgoprudnyi, Russia
5
Research Core Center of Voronezh State University, Voronezh State University, 394018 Voronezh, Russia
6
Physics Department, Sevastopol State University, 299053 Sevastopol, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(15), 3223; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14153223
Submission received: 24 June 2022 / Revised: 3 August 2022 / Accepted: 5 August 2022 / Published: 8 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immobilization of Enzyme in Polymers)

Abstract

:
Briefly, 2-(4-Acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan, which is a chitosan water-soluble derivative, with molecular weights of 200, 350, and 600 kDa, was successfully synthesized. The immobilization of ficin, papain, and bromelain was carried out by complexation with these polymers. The interaction mechanism of 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan with bromelain, ficin, and papain was studied using FTIR spectroscopy. It was found that the hydroxy, thionyl, and amino groups of 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan were involved in the complexation process. Molecular docking research showed that all amino acid residues of the active site of papain formed hydrogen bonds with the immobilization matrix, while only two catalytically valuable amino acid residues took part in the H-bond formation for bromelain and ficin. The spectral and in silico data were in good agreement with the catalytic activity evaluation data. Immobilized papain was more active compared to the other immobilized proteases. Moreover, the total and specific proteolytic activity of papain immobilized on the carrier with a molecular weight of 350 kDa were higher compared to the native one due to the hyperactivation. The optimal ratio of protein content (mg × g −1 of carrier), total activity (U × mL−1 of solution), and specific activity (U × mg−1 of protein) was determined for the enzymes immobilized on 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan with a molecular weight of 350 kDa.

1. Introduction

The research and development of new antibacterial substances is an important goal for modern chemistry, biology, and medicine. Due to the wide availability of some antibiotics and their uncontrolled use, many pathogenic microorganisms have developed resistance to their action. This significantly reduces the effectiveness of therapy according to currently relevant treatment protocols [1,2,3,4,5]. Moreover, often-used antibacterial drugs are characterized by non-selective activity against pathogens. Treatment with such drugs leads to pronounced side effects caused by a significant increase, even to toxic values, in their concentration in the blood. This process, also known as burst release, is followed by a decrease to a level below therapeutic values in the concentration of the drug [6,7]. All these factors necessitate the search for new biologically active substances with antibacterial properties, as well as the creation of new pharmaceutical forms of existing drugs to rationalize their practical use and prolong the action of a biologically active substance.
Cysteine proteases are a group of enzymes catalyzing the hydrolysis of proteins and peptides. They are widely distributed in nature and found in both animals and plants. Some of them, such as plant bromelain (EC 3.4.22.32/3.4.22.33), papain (EC 3.4.22.2), and ficin (EC 3.4.22.3), have an antibacterial effect. The mechanism of their action is the following: the enzymes cause the decomposition of proteins loosening the cell wall, leading to cell leakage, swelling, the destruction of the bacterial membrane, and cell damage. Bromelain, papain, and ficin are widely used for various medical purposes, such as wound dressing, as well as the removal of necrotic and infected tissues in wounds or burns [8,9,10,11].
Bromelain, ficin, and papain are globular proteins consisting of two clearly differentiated domains which are α-helix (L-domain) and a β-barrel-like structure (R-domain) [12]. Their active site is located at the interface of the L- and R-domains and is formed by cysteine, histidine, and aspartic acid residues. The cysteine and histidine residues form an ion catalytic pair stabilized by aspartic acid fixing the histidine imidazole cycle. The cysteine thiol group interacts with the carbonyl group of a substrate peptide bond, forming a tetrahedral intermediate. The one collapses to regenerate the carbonyl group, resulting in an acyl-enzyme complex, which is hydrolyzed into the free enzyme and the N-terminal portion of the product [12].
It is known that the dissolved forms of enzymes are characterized by low stability, which limits their use in drug development. This problem can be solved by immobilizing the enzyme on an inert or antibacterial matrix [13,14,15,16,17,18]. Immobilization increases the rigidity of the tertiary structure of the enzyme molecules, thereby stabilizing it and increasing the half-life [19].
The promising matrices for enzymes immobilization that have attracted research attention in recent decades are carbon nanostructured materials (such as carbon (functionalized) nanotubes, graphene or its oxide, etc.) [20,21], and natural polysaccharides, as well as their derivatives, particularly chitosan, which is characterized by antibacterial activity [22]. Interestingly, biocompatibility and non-toxicity mean that chitosan and its derivatives are potential candidates for both conventional and novel drug delivery systems. Moreover, chitosan-based matrixes are of interest in tissue engineering for controlled drug release, as well as for tissue remodeling, due to their fibrous and porous properties [23,24,25].
Ficin [8], papain [26], and bromelain [27] have already been immobilized using chitosan, but hyperactivation effects were not observed. Ficin and papain immobilized on chitosan have excellent antimicrobial and anti-biofilm properties against Staphylococci microorganisms [8,18]. Moreover, immobilized papain and ficin are capable of batch desorption, which makes them less cytotoxic compared to native enzymes [18].
To expand the possibilities of using chitosan, it is advisable to carry out its chemical modification. It is well known that macromolecules of polysaccharides are bound by a large number of intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonds formed between the functional groups of the pyranose cycles [28]. This affects their ability to dissolve in water: chitosan with molecular weight > 10,000 is soluble only in acidic media with pH < 6.5 [29]. The introduction of functional groups that block hydrogen bond formation centers makes it possible to increase the pH range of the solubility of this polymer. In addition, the introduction of new groups can increase conjugation ability or biological activity. For example, the introduction of succinic residues into macromolecules acid enhances the antibacterial properties of chitosan [30].
Therefore, we propose for the first time to use water-soluble derivatives of chitosan–2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan for the immobilization of some cysteine proteases (ficin, papain, bromelain). This polymer is characterized by antifungal activity [31]. Moreover, it contains moieties of sulfanilamide which is an antibacterial agent; so, 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan can be characterized by higher activity compared to the unmodified chitosan. Thus, the synergistic effects of combining the antimicrobial properties of cysteine proteases and 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan can be expected.
This work aims to develop biocatalysts based on cysteine proteases in complex with 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan and study their structural features.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Bromelain (B4882), papain (P4762), and ficin (F4165) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Germany and were used without any treatments. Azocasein (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) was used as a hydrolysis substrate in catalytic activity evaluation experiments. Chitosan with molecular weights of 200, 350, and 600 kDa and a degree of deacetylation of 0.73–0.85 (Bioprogress, Shchelkovo, Russia), 4-acetylsulfanilyl chloride (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany), dimethyl sulfoxide, and acetone (both analysis grade, ReaKhim, Moscow, Russia) were applied for 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan synthesis.

2.2. 2-(4-Acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) Chitosan Synthesis and Characterization

For a typical experiment, 2 g of chitosan and 150 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were placed in a thermostatically controlled reactor equipped with a stirrer and a reflux condenser, and the mixture was dispersed for 30 min at room temperature. Then, a solution of 4-acetylsulfanilyl chloride in 15 mL of DMSO was added dropwise (chitosan: reagent = 2:3 mol/mol) and the mixture was kept at 60 °C with constant stirring for 6 h. The resulting product was isolated by precipitation into acetone, the precipitate was filtered off and washed several times with acetone, after which the products were dried in a vacuum oven to constant weight. The product yields were 75–83%.
The chitosan modification was confirmed by FTIR spectroscopy on a Bruker Vertex-70 spectrometer (Bremen, Germany). The degrees of substitution of the products obtained were calculated from the FTIR data by correlating the areas under the absorption bands at 1035 cm−1 corresponding to the skeletal vibrations of the chitosan pyranose cycles and at 1402 cm−1 related to the vibrations of the thionyl groups. The obtained values were 0.327, 0.286, and 0.167 for the polymers with molecular weights of 200, 350, and 600 kDa, respectively.

2.3. Molecular Docking

The preparation of the structure of the cysteine proteases for docking [19] and the process of modeling interactions were carried out as described by Holyavka et al. [32,33]. The PDB IDs for enzyme input files were the following: 1W0Q for bromelain, 4YYW for ficin, and 9PAP for papain.
The enzyme structures were prepared for docking according to the standard scheme for the Autodock Vina package (The Scripps Research Institute, San-Diego, CA, USA): the atoms (together with their coordinates) of the solvent, buffer, and ligand molecules were removed from the PDB input file. Before carrying out the numerical calculations, a charge was placed on the surface of the proteins using the MGLTools. The center of the molecule and the parameters of the box («cells») were set manually, ensuring that the whole protease molecule could fit in the box.
The 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan structure model was drawn in the HyperChem molecular designer (HyperCube Inc., Waterloo, ON, Canada); this structure was consistently optimized first in the AMBER force field, and then quantum-chemically in PM3. The ligands in the docking calculations had the maximum conformational freedom: the rotation of the functional groups around all single bonds was allowed. Charge arrangement on the chitosan molecule and its protonation/deprotonation was performed automatically in the MGLTools 1.5.6 package (The Scripps Research Institute, San-Diego, CA, USA).

2.4. Enzyme Immobilization

Enzyme immobilization was carried out by complexation. Firstly, to 1 g of 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan was added 20 mL of an enzyme solution (1 mg × mL−1 in 0.05 M glycine buffer with a pH of 10.0 for ficin; 0.05 M glycine buffer with a pH of 9.0 for papain; and 0.05 M Tris-glycine buffer with a pH of 9.0 for bromelain) and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. After that, the formed precipitate was washed by dialysis against 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer with a pH of 7.5 through a cellophane membrane with a 25 kDa pore size until the absence of protein in the washing water (control was carried out on an SF-2000 spectrophotometer (LOMO-microsystems, Saint Petersburg, Russia) at λ = 280 nm).

2.5. Protein Content Measurement

The protein content in the immobilized enzymes was determined by the modified Lowry method [34]. The modification consisted of the decomposition of the bonds between the carrier matrix and the enzyme molecule in the first step of the analysis. The immobilized enzyme was treated with the solution of K, Na-tartrate (in a concentration of 20 mg × mL−1 or 0.7 M) that was prepared from 1 M NaOH at 50 °C for 10 min. Earlier, proteins were shown to be completely desorbed under these conditions [17,35]. The absence of the enzyme destruction processes was controlled by recording its absorption spectrum on a UV-2550PC spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments Inc., Kyoto, Japan).

2.6. Proteolytic Activity Evaluation of the Immobilized Enzymes

Azocasein was chosen as the hydrolysis substrate for proteolytic activity determination [36]. The experiments were conducted in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer with pH 7.5 at 37 °C as described in [32]. The substrate concentration was 0.4% w. Briefly, the sample was dissolved in 200 μL of buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5), mixed with 800 μL of azocasein solution (0.5% in the same buffer), and incubated for 30 min at the temperatures indicated above. Then, 800 μL of 5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) solution was added, and after 10 min incubation at 4 °C, the precipitated unhydrolyzed azocasein was removed by centrifugation (3 min 13,000 rpm). The supernatant (1200 μL) was mixed with 240 μL of 1 M NaOH solution, and its optical density was measured at 410 nm. The unit of catalytic activity was taken as the amount of enzyme that hydrolyzed 1 μM of the substrate in 1 min (Μm × min−1 × mg−1).

3. Results

Figure 1 represents the FTIR spectra of 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan (Scheme 1) and its complexes with bromelain, ficin, and papain. The FTIR spectrum of 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan contained the following characteristic absorption bands described in Table 1. These bands were observed in the spectra of the polymer with enzymes; however, some changes indicated the formation of the complex. The C-O-C bonds of the pyranose cycles were reflected as a two-component band with two maxima at 1035 and 1050 cm−1 in the chitosan derivative spectrum, and the intensity of the component at 1050 cm−1 was lower compared to the one at 1035 cm−1. In the spectra of the enzyme complexes, the intensity of these components became more similar. This demonstrated the involvement of the OH-groups of 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan in the enzyme complex formation. Moreover, the wavenumber shifts were observed for some bands. The wavenumber increased for νas(SO2), νbreath(benzene cycles), and δplan(N-H), and it decreased for δplan(C-H). These patterns were present in the spectra of all researched enzymes. More interesting changes occurred with the Amide I bands. Its intensity decreased for all complexes; however, the bromelain and ficin wavenumber decreased, as the one did not shift for the papain complex. This indirectly indicated a significant change in the conformations of bromelain and ficin, while papain underwent fewer conformation changes.
An analysis of the protein content in the immobilized enzymes showed that the largest amount of ficin and bromelain (mg × g−1 carrier) bound to a polymer with a molecular weight of 600 kDa, and there was no significant effect of the molecular weight on the papain content (Figure 2A). The total activity of ficin (U × mL−1 of solution) was higher in the complex with 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan with a molecular weight of 600 kDa, while the one for papain and bromelain was higher for the complexes with polymers with a molecular weight of 350 kDa (Figure 2B). All immobilized enzymes in complex with 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan with a molecular weight of 350 kDa showed the highest specific activity (U × mg−1 of protein) (Figure 2C). This was probably due to the polymer matrix with a molecular weight of 350 kDa providing the best steric accessibility of the active site for the substrate.
Moreover, papain immobilized on 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan with a molecular weight of 350 kDa had a higher proteolytic activity compared to the native one. The increase in enzymatic activity compared to the free enzyme may be due to several mechanisms. First, the activity of papain can increase after immobilization due to a change in the conformation of its molecule, which has a positive effect on the reaction rate. Secondly, enzymes can be inhibited by high concentrations of the substrate or some reaction products, which reduces the observed activity, while immobilization completely or partially prevents inhibition. [42]. In addition, in the case of papain, immobilization probably suppresses such inactivation processes as aggregation and autolysis. The fact is that in the immobilized state, the mobility of proteins is, as a rule, sharply limited, while the essential stage of both mechanisms is the movement of two (or several) protease molecules to each other with their subsequent interaction. [43]. Considering the efficiency of complexation for this case, it is clear that hyperactivation occurred. Moreover, the results obtained correlated with the FTIR and molecular docking data.
For a more detailed explanation of the results obtained, we performed in silico experiments on the molecular docking (Figure 3, Table 2). Interestingly, the percentage of the retention activity of bromelain and ficin after complexation was comparable; however, there was a significantly different number of hydrogen bonds and physical interactions formed by them with the 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan matrix. The highest percentage of remaining activity was observed for papain. This is probably due to the entire catalytic triad being involved in the process of complexation: Cys25 and Asp158 form hydrogen bonds, and His159 generates van der Waals interactions with the matrix. For the other enzymes, only two amino acid residues in the active site participate in the process of complexation: Cys23 and His158 form hydrogen bonds in bromelain, while Cys22 and Asp161 form hydrogen bonds in ficin.

4. Conclusions

In the present work, we synthesized the water-soluble chitosan derivatives, 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan with molecular weights of 200, 350, and 600 kDa. For the first time, the cysteine proteases ficin, papain, and bromelain, were immobilized by complexation with these polymers. The investigation of the interaction mechanism between the component researched by FTIR and molecular docking shows that all catalytically valuable amino acid residues of bromelain and ficin participated in the hydrogen bond formations, while papain generated two hydrogen bonds through the amino acid residues of the active site. This feature in cooperative action with the influence of the steric factors of 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan with a molecular weight of 350 kDa leads to papain hyperactivation and an increase in proteolytic activity. At the same time, the catalytic activity of the other immobilized enzymes was lower compared to the native ones. The optimal ratio of protein content (mg × g−1 of carrier), total activity (U × mL−1 of solution), and specific activity (U × mg−1 of protein) was determined for the complexes of all the studied proteases with 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan with a molecular weight of 350 kDa. We expect complexes of 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) with cysteine proteases—ficin, bromelain, and especially papain appears to be a beneficial agent for outer wound treatment capable of the biofilm’s destruction, increasing the efficacy of wound treatment.

Author Contributions

M.G.H. and V.G.A.; methodology, S.S.O., A.V.S., N.V.M. and N.E.Y. investigation, A.N.L. and Y.M.V. resources, M.S.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S.L. and M.G.H.; writing—review and editing, M.G.H. and V.G.A.; supervision, M.G.H. and V.G.A.; project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, Project Number 21-74-20053 in part of the 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan synthesis and immobilization of the enzymes; by program ‘Prioritet-2030′ of Sevastopol State University, strategic project №3 in part of the molecular docking; by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russia under Agreement N 075-15-2021-1351 in part of FTIR spectroscopy.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The FTIR data were obtained with the use of the equipment of the Research Core Center of Voronezh State University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Magiorakos, A.-P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Meng, Q.; Zhong, S.; Xu, L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, Y.; Cui, X. Review on design strategies and considerations of polysaccharide-based smart drug delivery systems for cancer therapy. Carbohyd. Polym. 2022, 279, 119013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Liu, Z.; Wang, K.; Peng, X.; Zhang, L. Chitosan-based drug delivery systems: Current strategic design and potential application in human hard tissue repair. Eur. Polym. J. 2022, 166, 110979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hadji, H.; Bouchemal, K. Advances in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: Focus on polysaccharide nanoparticulate drug delivery systems. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2022, 181, 114101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, S.; Zhou, Y.; Li, R.; Chen, Z.; Fan, X. Advanced drug delivery system against ischemic stroke. J. Control. Release 2022, 344, 173–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bhattacharjee, S. Understanding the burst release phenomenon: Toward designing effective nanoparticulate drug-delivery systems. Ther. Deliv. 2020, 12, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, X.; Brazel, C.S. On the importance and mechanisms of burst release in matrix-controlled drug delivery systems. J. Control. Release 2001, 73, 121–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Baidamshina, D.R.; Koroleva, V.A.; Trizna, E.Y.; Pankova, S.M.; Agafonova, M.N.; Chirkova, M.N.; Vasileva, O.S.; Akhmetov, N.; Shubina, V.V.; Porfiryev, A.G.; et al. Anti-biofilm and wound-healing activity of chitosan-immobilized Ficin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 4205–4217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sun, Y.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, L.; Shen, Y.; Huang, S.; Li, M.; Qiu, W.; Pan, Y.; Zhou, L.; et al. The Inhibitory Effects of Ficin on Streptococcus mutans Biofilm Formation. BioMed Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 6692328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Asanarong, O.; Quan, V.M.; Boonrungsiman, S.; Sukyai, P. Bioactive wound dressing using bacterial cellulose loaded with papain composite: Morphology, loading/release and antibacterial properties. Eur. Polym. J. 2021, 143, 110224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hikisz, P.; Bernasinska-Slomczewska, J. Beneficial Properties of Bromelain. Nutrients 2021, 13, 4313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Fernandez-Lucas, J.; Castaneda, D.; Hormingo, D. New trends for a classical enzyme: Papain, a biotechnological success story in the food industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 68, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, J.; Gao, B.; Lv, K.; Kumissay, L.; Wu, B.; Chu, J.; He, B. Specific immobilization of lipase on functionalized 3D printing scaffolds via enhanced hydrophobic interaction for efficient resolution of racemic 1-indanol. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021, 546, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mousavi, S.; Khoshfetrat, A.B.; Khatami, N.; Ahmadian, M.; Rahbarghzi, R. Comparative study of collagen and gelatin in chitosan-based hydrogels for effective wound dressing: Physical properties and fibroblastic cell behavior. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 518, 625–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, Y.; Cheng, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Shi, B.; Huang, C.; Yang, X.; Liu, T. Novel chitosan/collagen scaffold containing transforming growth factor-β1 DNA for periodontal tissue engineering, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 344, 362–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ol’shannikova, S.S.; Red’ko, Y.A.; Lavlinskaya, M.S.; Sorokin, A.V.; Holyavka, M.G.; Artyukhov, V.G. Preparation of Papain Complexes with Chitosan Microparticles and Evaluation of Their Stability Using the Enzyme Activity Level. Pharm. Chem. J. 2022, 55, 1240–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pankova, S.M.; Sakibaev, F.A.; Holyavka, M.G.; Vyshkvorkina, Y.M.; Lukin, A.N.; Artyukhov, V.G. Studies of the Processes of the Trypsin Interactions with Ion Exchange Fibers and Chitosan. Rus. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 47, 765–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Baidamshina, D.R.; Koroleva, V.A.; Olshannikova, S.S.; Trizna, E.Y.; Bogachev, M.I.; Artyukhov, V.G.; Holyavka, M.G.; Kayumov, A.R. Biochemical Properties and Anti-Biofilm Activity of Chitosan-Immobilized Papain. Mar. Drugs. 2021, 19, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Holyavka, M.G.; Makin, S.M.; Kondratyev, M.S.; Abdullatypov, A.V.; Kovaleva, T.A.; Artyukhov, V.G. Supramolecular Organization of Inulinases from Aspergillus awamori, Aspergillus ficuum and Kluyveromyces marxianus: A Comparative Aspect. Biophysics 2018, 63, 866–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Patila, M.; Chalmpes, N.; Dounousi, E.; Stamatis, H.; Gournis, D. Use of functionalized carbon nanotubes for the development of robust nanobiocatalysts. Methods Enzymol. 2020, 630, 263–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chalmpes, N.; Patila, M.; Kouloumpis, A.; Alatzoglou, C.; Spyrou, K.; Subrati, M.; Polydera, A.C.; Bourlinos, A.B.; Stamatis, H.; Gournis, D. Graphene Oxide–Cytochrome c Multilayered Structures for Biocatalytic Applications: Decrypting the Role of Surfactant in Langmuir–Schaefer Layer Deposition. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 26204–26215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, J.; Zhuang, S. Antibacterial activity of chitosan and its derivatives and their interaction mechanism with bacteria: Current state and perspectives. Eur. Polym. J. 2020, 138, 109984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kumar, M.; Muzzarelli, R.A.A.; Muzzarelli, C.; Sashiwa, H.; Domb, A.J. Chitosan chemistry and pharmaceutical perspectives. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 6017–6084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, H.B.; Du, Y.M.; Xu, Y.M. Adsorption and complexation of chitosan wet-end additives in papermaking systems. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 91, 2642–2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Muzzarelli, R.A.A.; Muzzarelli, C. Chitosan Chemistry: Relevance to the Biomedical Sciences. In Polysaccharides I. Advances in Polymer Science; Heinze, T., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; Volume 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Silva, D.F.; Rosa, H.; Carvalho, A.F.A.; Oliva-Neto, P. Immobilization of Papain on Chitin and Chitosan and Recycling of Soluble Enzyme for Deflocculation of Saccharomyces cerevisiaefrom Bioethanol Distilleries. Enzyme Res. 2015, 2015, 573721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zappino, M.; Cacciotti, I.; Benucci, I.; Nanni, F.; Liburdi, K.; Valentini, F.; Esti, M. Bromelain immobilization on microbial and animal source chitosan films, plasticized with glycerol, for application in wine-like medium: Microstructural, mechanical and catalytic characterisations. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 45, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jiang, T.; James, R.; Kumbar, S.G.; Laurencin, C.T. Chitosan as a Biomaterial. In Natural and Synthetic Biomedical Polymers, 1st ed.; Kumbar, S.G., Laurencin, C.T., Deng, M., Eds.; Elsevier: Burlington, VT, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  29. Akpan, E.I.; Gbenebor, O.P.; Adeosun, S.O.; Cletus, O. Solubility, degree of acetylation, and distribution of acetyl groups in chitosan. In Handbook of Chitin and Chitosan. Volume 1: Preparation and Properties; Gopi, S., Thomas, S., Pius, A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  30. Niu, X.; Zhu, L.; Xi, L.; Guo, L.; Wang, H. An antimicrobial agent prepared by N-succinyl chitosan immobilized lysozyme and its application in strawberry preservation. Food Control 2019, 108, 106829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhong, Z.; Chen, R.; Xing, R.; Chen, X.; Liu, S.; Guo, Z.; Ji, X.; Wang, L.; Li, P. Synthesis and antifungal properties of sulfanilamide derivatives of chitosan. Carbohyd. Res. 2007, 342, 2390–2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Holyavka, M.; Faizullin, D.; Koroleva, V.; Olshannikova, S.; Zakhartchenko, N.; Zuev, Y.; Kondtatyev, M.; Zakharova, E.; Artyukhov, V. Novel biotechnological formulations of cysteine proteases, immobilized on chitosan. Structure, stability and activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 180, 161–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Holyavka, M.G.; Kondratyev, M.S.; Samchenko, A.A.; Kabanov, A.V.; Komarov, V.M.; Artyukhov, V.G. In silico design of high-affinity ligands for the immobilization of inulinase. Comput. Biol. Med. 2016, 71, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lowry, O.H.; Rosebrough, N.J.; Faar, A.L.; Randall, R.J. Protein measurement with Folin-phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Artyukhov, V.G.; Kovaleva, T.A.; Kholyavka, M.G.; Bityutskaya, L.A.; Grechkina, M.V. Thermal inactivation of free and immobilized inulinase. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2010, 46, 385–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sabirova, A.R.; Rudakova, N.L.; Balaban, N.P.; Ilyinskaya, O.N.; Demidyuk, I.V.; Kostrov, S.V.; Rudenskaya, G.N.; Sharipova, M.R. A novel secreted metzincin metalloproteinase from Bacillus intermedius. FEBS Lett. 2010, 584, 4419–4425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Bellamy, L.J. The Infra-Red Spectra of Complex Molecules, 1st ed.; Methuen & Co. Ltd.: London, UK; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1958. [Google Scholar]
  38. Sorokin, A.; Lavlinskaya, M. Synthesis of the superabsorbents enriched in chitosan derivatives with excellent water absorption properties. Polym. Bull. 2022, 79, 407–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tantala, J.; Thumanu, K.; Rachtanapun, C. An assessment of antibacterial mode of action of chitosan on Listeria innocua cells using real-time HATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 135, 386–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhu, W.; Chen, T.; He, R.; Ding, Y.; Duan, T.; Xiao, B. Understanding the interfacial interactions of bioinspired chitosan-calcite nanocomposites by first principles molecular dynamics simulations and experimental FT-IR spectroscopy. Carbohyd. Polym. 2019, 223, 115054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Baumann, H.; Faust, V. Concepts for improved regioselective placement of O-sulfo, N-sulfo, N-acetyl, and N-carboxymethyl groups in chitosan derivatives. Carbohyd. Res. 2001, 331, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rodrigues, R.C.; Ortiz, C.; Berenguer-Murcia, A.; Torres, R.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Modifying enzyme activity and selectivity by immobilization. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 6290–6307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tavano, O.L.; Berenguer-Murcia, A.; Secundo, F.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Biotechnological Applications of Proteases in Food Technology. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018, 17, 412–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Scheme 1. The structural formula of 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan.
Scheme 1. The structural formula of 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan.
Polymers 14 03223 sch001
Figure 1. The FTIR spectra of 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan and the immobilized enzymes.
Figure 1. The FTIR spectra of 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan and the immobilized enzymes.
Polymers 14 03223 g001
Figure 2. Immobilized ficin, papain, and bromelain characteristics: A—protein content (mg × g−1 of carrier) in the enzyme complexes with 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan; B—the total activity (U × mL−1 of solution) of the enzyme complexes with 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan; C—the specific activity (U × mg−1 of protein) of the enzyme complexes with 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan. The efficiency of the complexation for each protease is expressed as a percentage of the sorbed enzyme from its amount in solution (A), of the total activity of the immobilized enzyme compared to the soluble enzyme (B), and of the specific activity of the immobilized enzyme compared to the soluble enzyme (C) are indicated above the bars.
Figure 2. Immobilized ficin, papain, and bromelain characteristics: A—protein content (mg × g−1 of carrier) in the enzyme complexes with 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan; B—the total activity (U × mL−1 of solution) of the enzyme complexes with 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan; C—the specific activity (U × mg−1 of protein) of the enzyme complexes with 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan. The efficiency of the complexation for each protease is expressed as a percentage of the sorbed enzyme from its amount in solution (A), of the total activity of the immobilized enzyme compared to the soluble enzyme (B), and of the specific activity of the immobilized enzyme compared to the soluble enzyme (C) are indicated above the bars.
Polymers 14 03223 g002
Figure 3. Bonds (indicated by dashed lines) and interactions between the molecules of bromelain (A), ficin (B), and papain (C) and 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan.
Figure 3. Bonds (indicated by dashed lines) and interactions between the molecules of bromelain (A), ficin (B), and papain (C) and 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan.
Polymers 14 03223 g003
Table 1. 2-(4-Acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan FTIR spectrum band description [37,38,39,40,41].
Table 1. 2-(4-Acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan FTIR spectrum band description [37,38,39,40,41].
Wavenumber, cm−1Band Description
1005Planar deformation vibrations of the C-H bonds of the 1,4-disubstituted aromatic cycles
1035Vibrations of the C-O-C bonds in the pyranose cycles
1050
1120Planar deformation vibrations of the C-H bonds of the 1,4-disubstituted aromatic cycles
1136Stretching symmetric vibrations of the SO2 groups
1157Stretching vibrations of the 1,4-glycosidic bonds
1296Vibrations of the SO2 groups
1332Amide III, stretching vibrations of the C-N bonds
1402Stretching asymmetric vibrations of the SO2 groups
1461Stretching breathing vibrations of the benzene cycles
1517
1551Amide II, deformation vibrations of the N-H bonds
1595Deformation planar vibrations of the primary amine N-H bonds
1629Amide I, stretching vibrations of the C=O bonds
2758Stretching symmetric vibrations of the methylene groups
2808
2892
2934Stretching asymmetric vibrations of the methylene groups
2974Stretching asymmetric vibrations of the methyl groups
3104Stretching vibrations of the C-H bonds in aromatic cycles
3181
Table 2. The enzyme amino acid residues interacting with 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan.
Table 2. The enzyme amino acid residues interacting with 2-(4-acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) chitosan.
Affinity,
kcal/mol
Amino Acid Residues Forming
H-Bonds, Length, ÅOther Interactions
(1) Bromelain
−10.0Thr15
Gln20
Asn21
Cys23
His158
Lys179
Trp180
Gly184
3.12
3.17
2.88
3.02
3.15
3.22
3.15
2.72
Val14, Ser16, Val17, Lys18, Asn19, Pro22, Phe29, Ala33, Glu36, Ser37, Lys64, Gly65, Gly66, Trp67, Glu68, Ala133, Ala136, Asn137, Asn157, Val160, Ile163, Ala178, Tyr185, Ile186
(2) Papain
−7.4Ser21
Cys25
Asn64
Gly66
Gln142
Asp158
Trp177
Ser205
3.27
3.10
3.01
3.10
2.94
3.07
3.03
3.10
Asn18, Gln19, Gly20, Cys22, Gly23, Tyr61, Cys63, Gly65, Tyr67, Val133, His159
(3) Ficin
−7.9Gln19
Gly20
Cys22
Met70
Asn160
Asp161
2.97
2.74
2.81
3.12
2.77
2.97
Lys21, Gly23, Sch25, Tyr60, Lys66, Gly67, Gly68, Trp69, Asp71, Ala139, Ser140, Lys145, Ala159, Trp184, Trp188, Glu212
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Olshannikova, S.S.; Malykhina, N.V.; Lavlinskaya, M.S.; Sorokin, A.V.; Yudin, N.E.; Vyshkvorkina, Y.M.; Lukin, A.N.; Holyavka, M.G.; Artyukhov, V.G. Novel Immobilized Biocatalysts Based on Cysteine Proteases Bound to 2-(4-Acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) Chitosan and Research on Their Structural Features. Polymers 2022, 14, 3223. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14153223

AMA Style

Olshannikova SS, Malykhina NV, Lavlinskaya MS, Sorokin AV, Yudin NE, Vyshkvorkina YM, Lukin AN, Holyavka MG, Artyukhov VG. Novel Immobilized Biocatalysts Based on Cysteine Proteases Bound to 2-(4-Acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) Chitosan and Research on Their Structural Features. Polymers. 2022; 14(15):3223. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14153223

Chicago/Turabian Style

Olshannikova, Svetlana S., Nataliya V. Malykhina, Maria S. Lavlinskaya, Andrey V. Sorokin, Nikolay E. Yudin, Yulia M. Vyshkvorkina, Anatoliy N. Lukin, Marina G. Holyavka, and Valeriy G. Artyukhov. 2022. "Novel Immobilized Biocatalysts Based on Cysteine Proteases Bound to 2-(4-Acetamido-2-sulfanilamide) Chitosan and Research on Their Structural Features" Polymers 14, no. 15: 3223. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14153223

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop