Next Article in Journal
Advances in Molecularly Imprinted Polymers Based Affinity Sensors (Review)
Previous Article in Journal
Motility Improvement of Biomimetic Trachea Scaffold via Hybrid 3D-Bioprinting Technology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Cu Ions Implantation on Structural, Electronic, Optical and Dielectric Properties of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA)

1
Centre for Advanced Studies in Physics, GC University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
2
Nuclear and Radiological Control Unit, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), Riyadh 11442, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(6), 973; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13060973
Submission received: 3 February 2021 / Revised: 8 March 2021 / Accepted: 16 March 2021 / Published: 22 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electrochemical Investigation of Polymers and Their Nanocomposites)

Abstract

:
In this work, the effect of ion bombardment on the optical properties of Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) was studied. Polymer samples were implanted with 500 keV Cu+ ions with a fluence ranging from 1 × 1012 to 1 × 1014 ions/cm2. X-ray Diffractometer (XRD) study indicated a relatively lower variation with a higher dose of ions. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectra exhibited that with the implantation of Cu ions the intensity of existing bands decreases, while the result confirms the existence of a C=C group. The pristine and ion-implanted samples were also investigated using photoluminescence (PL) and Ultra Violet-Visible (UV-VIS) spectra. The optical band gap (Eg) was observed up to 3.05 eV for the implanted samples, while the pristine sample exhibited a wide energy-gap up to ~3.9 eV. The change in the optical gap indicated the presence of a gradual phase transition for the polymer blends. The dielectric measurements of the pristine and Cu-implanted PMMA were investigated in the 10 Hz to 2 GHz frequency range. It was found that the implanted samples showed a significant decrease in the value of the dielectric constant. The value of the dielectric constant and dielectric loss of the PMMA and Cu-implanted samples at a 1-kHz frequency were found to be ~300 and 29, respectively. The modification of the PMMA energy bandgap in the current research suggested the potential use of Cu implanted PMMA in the field of optical communications and flexible electronic devices.

1. Introduction

Polymers with large molecular weights are promising candidates due to their versatile properties, forms and compositions. The range of applications varies, e.g., biomedical, electronic, structural and optical fields, which leads to the fabrication of medical implants, microelectronics, parts for the automotive industry, antireflective coatings and optical sensors in this modern age [1,2,3,4]. These applications are the consequence of polymers’ inherent and unique properties, such as being anti-corrosive, lightweight, economic, moldability, optical clarity, weather-resistive and ease of availability [5,6]. Functional desire and the enhancement of such applications can be easily fulfilled by introducing modification in the chemical and structural properties of polymers. Modification techniques that can be helpful in order to enhance the various properties of polymers are gamma rays, ultraviolet, neutron, electron and ion implantation. Different polymers, such as Polyethene oxide (PEO), low-density polyethene (LDPE), Poly vinyl Alcohol (PVA), Polytetraflouro ethylene (PTFE), Poly vinyl chloride (PVC), Polyethene glycol (PEG), Polycarbonate (PC), Polypropylene (PP), Polyallyldiglycol carbonate (PADC) and Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) exhibit a remarkable chemical and physical properties after surface modification [7]. Among these polymers, PMMA is extensively used by researchers due to its excellent properties, such as chemically inertness, better electrical insulation, excellent optical transparency and low wettability. PMMA is considered preferable as an alternate material to glass and different optical lenses [8]. Different techniques are used by researchers to alter the structural and chemical properties, such as heat treatment, doping, change in composition, mixing of ion beams, ion trapping and ion beam modification. An important and widely used techniques is the modification of surface properties of polymers using electrons, neutrons, ion beams and gamma rays for versatile applications of polymers in background radiation devices, such as ballistic capsule, nuclear reactor, sterilization irradiators and high energy particle accelerators [9,10]. This technique causes a transformation in the chemical composition and structure with a well-controlled method [11]. The PMMA structure is strongly sensitive to the irradiations of energetic ions [12,13,14,15,16]. However, such surface properties are correlated with ion implantation parameters, such as ion impact, the mass of the ion and the density of ion. The energetic ions in this process interact with the target leading to various phenomena, such as chain scissoring, electron excitation, ionization of atoms, the formation of free radicals, emission of volatile gases and the formation of multiple carbon–carbon bonds [17,18,19]. Ion implantation generates irreversible structural changes required for the production of advance polymers owing to the modified attributes. The irreversible changes effectively depend on the energy loss of implanted ions, range of ion penetration in sample matrix and ion implantation conditions, i.e., energy, skin depth and radiant ion dose [20,21,22,23,24]. The modification made by ion implantation is the outcome of the energy loss of incident ions with the target sample. The interaction of incident ions with target causes mainly two types of processes: (1) nuclear stopping and (2) electronic stopping [25]. In the nuclear stopping mechanism, momentum is transferred from the ion to the matrix of the host material by elastic collision. In electronic stopping, glancing inelastic collision occur during the interaction of incident ions with a target. The electronic stopping process produces excitation in the target orbital electrons from a low energy level to a high energy level and culminating in the ionization of atoms [26,27,28]. The loss in total energy is due to power losses by nuclear stopping (Sn) and electronic stopping (Se) powers, respectively. These two stopping powers are normally responsible for producing cross-linking and chain scissoring in polymeric materials. Cross-linking is mainly observed in the electronic energy loss of ions in the polymers and chain scissoring activity is predominantly governed by the nuclear energy loss process. The ratio (Sn/Se) in the total energy loss gives the probability of structural modification of polymers induced by ion implantation [29,30,31].
In the present study, the Pelletron accelerator was employed to modify the physical properties of polymeric materials without changing their bulk properties. The implantation process offered improvements/alterations in their properties, e.g., electrical, optical, thermoelectric, surface morphology, mechanical, etc. Our main objective was to enhance the electrical properties of PMMA polymer by introducing/improving conducting behavior in the insulating polymer via the ion implantation technique. The modification revealed the best aspects of PMMA physical properties. This approach was new and, to the best of our knowledge, there was less data regarding the modification of PMMA electronic and dielectric properties due to the metal ions. Various characterization techniques were used to analyze these materials, like X-ray diffraction (XRD) for structural analysis, UV-visible plus photoluminescence spectrophotometry to investigate the optical behavior and FTIR for the verification of the existence of functional groups. The effect of the interaction of alternating current (AC) signal with the polymer was observed by analyzing dielectric properties.

2. Experimental Setup

Cu1+ ions beam of 500 KeV energy with a beam size of 2 × 2 cm2 from the Pelletron linear accelerator (6SDH-2 NEC, Middleton, WI, USA) installed at the Centre for Advanced Studies in Physics (CASP) GC University Lahore was used to perform the ion beam treatment for the Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) targets. Three PMMA targets of 2 × 2 cm2 were mounted on the sample holder and exposed to an ion beam with a fluence ranging from 1 × 1012 to 1 × 1014 ions cm−2 and the fourth sample, which was not implanted, was referred to as a pristine sample. A schematic diagram for the complete process of ions with the polymer is shown in Figure 1.
The parameters used for the irradiation of samples are presented in Table 1. The ion beam was focused on a spot of ~1 mm in diameter and, to ensure uniform irradiation, the magnetic scanner continuously scanned over the complete area of the samples. Figure 2 depicts the representation of the pristine and high dose surface of the PMMA samples.
To avoid the channeling effect, implantation was performed at a low angle with respect to the ion beam direction. The electronic energy loss (Se) and nuclear energy loss (Sn) for PMMA samples was calculated using the Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter (SRIM) simulation program [32].

Characterization

The phase composition and structure of samples were analyzed using X-ray diffraction (XRD) (PANalytical X’Pert Pro X-ray diffractometer, Philips, Almelo, The Netherlands) with a Cu-Kα source (λ = 1.5418 Å). XRD patterns scanning range was 20° to 80° with a step size of 0.05°. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were obtained using attenuated total reflection (ATR) (Model IR Prestige-21, SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan) to observe the functional groups of the samples with a scan rate 32. The wavenumber and spectral resolution were set in the range of 550 to 4000 cm−1 and 4 cm−1, respectively. The rate of photogenerated charge carriers recombination was observed using a fluorescence spectrometer (F-4500, HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan) at room temperature. UV–vis spectrophotometer (Genesys 10S spectrophotometer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to analyze the absorption behavior. The frequency-dependent dielectric characteristics were analyzed using 6500B Wayne Kerr Impedance Analyzer (Wayne Kerr Electronics, Bognor Regis, West Sussex, UK). These parameters, i.e., tangent loss (tan δ) and frequency-dependent dielectric constant (ε) were calculated for a specimen having a capacitance C, diameters d and area was represented by A.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. SRIM Analysis

The simulation results are shown in Figure 3. The results showed a peak at the depth of 60 nm representing the implantation profile peak. The study showed that heavy-ion stopping global accuracy of SRIM-2013 simulations was about 6.0 % [33]. This concluded that 500 keV Cu+ ions would stop within the ~100 nm thick PMMA layer.

3.2. X-ray Diffractometer Analysis

XRD patterns of pristine and copper irradiated PMMA are shown in Figure 4. Results revealed that broad diffraction at 2θ = 29.74° for unirradiated PMMA indicated the amorphous nature of PMMA. Lovell and Windle [34] observed three broad halos in the PMMA XRD profile. They suggested that the first halos signifies the presence of intermolecular components, while the second and third halos represent intermolecular separation. Weak second and third halos were observed in the treated and pristine samples. Furthermore, the similar size of halos in all the samples was the same, which indicated the nonoccurrence of scission effect by copper implantation.

3.3. FTIR Analysis

The infrared active molecular groups of carbon, oxygen and hydrogen were identified in PMMA, which are presented in Table 2. Certain effects were noticed after ion implantation, such as transmittance being modified due to cross-linking, the chain of polymers being degraded and the formation of a new chemical bond, as shown in Figure 5. The presences of groups of carbonyl were noticed due to the IR peak at 1720 cm−1. The peaks in the IR spectrum of both pristine and treated at 1440 and 840 cm−1 represented the C-H bending and C-H2 rocking vibrations. The peaks in the range of 1270–995 cm−1 represented the C-O-C stretching vibrations [35,36].

3.4. Photoluminescence and UV-Vis Analysis

The pristine and Cu-ion-beam-implanted samples were analyzed using photoluminescence spectra. As shown in Figure 6, it was clear evidence that at certain doses, the obtained intensity in the PL spectra of the implanted PMMA was more intensive than that of unimplanted PMMA.
Results also revealed that due to Cu+ ion implantation, PL emission was present and it appeared to be much more prominent than in the lower energy region. On the other hand, below irradiation at 450 keV Cu+, PLE occurred notably at lower doses, particularly much absorbance was noted at 1 × 1012 ions/cm2. While the further rise in the implantation dose lead to a decrease in the absorbance intensity of the PL spectra, as shown in Figure 7.
Due to the modification, the broader value of the band of PMMA at ~400 nm showed a comparatively narrow and strong luminescence band at ~405 nm with FWHM ~50 nm. Certain spectral bands were also visible at the values of 427 nm, and 430.15 nm, respectively. These spectral characteristics were retained till the maximum available dose (D = 1 × 1013 ions/cm2). A logical justification for these spectral improvements in the creation of new states of luminescence and associated transitions was that the Cu+ related defect complexes were emanating them [37]. Moreover, the decrease in the absorbance intensity due to the higher dose of Cu ions might have been due to the dissipation of energy which increased the possibility of defects and the consequences of polymer structure degradation. UV-vis spectroscopy was also used to analyze the variation of optical bandgap in the UV-visible spectrum region of ~150 to 800 nm. Figure 8 exhibits the absorption spectra of UV-vis data. It showed that the maximum absorption occurred at the dose (D = 1 × 1012 ions/cm2). To identify the existence of energy band gap behavior of pristine and implanted PMMA samples, the UV-vis spectra translated into Tauc’s plot used the following equation [38],
α υ h υ = B h υ E g r
where α is the absorption coefficient, hv is the incident photon, Eg is the optical band gap and B is energy independent constant.
Figure 9 reveals that the optical band gap (Eg) decreased up to 3.05 eV for the implanted samples, while the energy gap in pristine PMMA was usually due to the presence of inactive carbon single bonds. The pristine sample exhibited a wide energy gap of ~3.9 eV as shown in Figure 9. It was observed that ion fluence displaced the ultraviolet wavelength region to the visible blue region. This showed the development of double bonds along the polymeric backbone [39]. The shifted region towards the vis region usually transformed the PMMA color into yellowish, as shown in Figure 2 [40].

3.5. Dielectric Measurements

The formula used to obtain the value of the dielectric constant is given as,
εr = cd/0
Here, c denotes capacitance, d represents thickness, A is an area and ε0 displays permittivity having worth of 8.854 × 10−12 Fm−1. Figure 10 and Figure 11 show the dielectric loss and dielectric constant of PMMA at room temperature as a function of frequency. At less than a 1-kHz frequency, when the copper ion was introduced, the value of the dielectric constant of pristine specimen lessened. At a lower frequency, the value 1013 ions/cm2 represents minor lessening. However, the dielectric constant largely reduced at a higher frequency. The concept of dispersion of polarization along frequency was implemented to demonstrate the falling trend of dielectric constant in the higher frequency region. The dielectric polarization of a particular block was the sum of all the kinds of polarizations, i.e., ionic polarization, electronic polarization and interfacial and dipolar polarization. At the frequency of 1 kHz, Maxwell–Wagner polarization was responsible for the greater values of dielectric constant. Such kind of polarization was originated from the interface of insulator-conductor. The gathering of dipoles or space charges at interfaces resulted in interfacial polarization. Within the low frequency area, space charges had enough interval to respond to the functional field. However, in high frequency area, the applied field was very fast, so that space charges had no time to respond to the applied field and, thus, the polarization effect did not occur [41]. From Figure 10, it is clear that the dielectric loss was reduced with an upturn of frequency. The presence of mobile charges in the polymeric chain at a smaller frequency was the main reason for this variation. As in high frequency, the space charges get it tough to respond to the applied field, so the charged gathering occurred on the behalf of polarization losses at high frequency. Hence, the value of dielectric loss declined [42]. Usually, the dielectric loss factor (tan δ) is considered to estimate the power loss in dielectric materials. For both real and imaginary components of dielectric constant, the dielectric loss tangent was given as: tan δ = ε′′/ε′. The reliance of the dielectric loss factor on frequency is elaborated on in Figure 12. The reduction in the tangent loss with respect to frequency was observed and was in agreement with the literature [43].

3.6. AC Conductivity

The frequency dependence of ac-conductivity was calculated using the following relation, σ ac = 2 π f ε 0 ε , where f is the frequency applied, ε″ is the dielectric loss and εo is the permittivity of free space. Figure 13 depicts that ac conductivity remained constant for the pristine sample of PMMA while Cu implanted samples showed an increasing trend in the ac conductivity with increasing frequency. The graph in Figure 13 also shows that at higher frequency, PMMA with Cu ions of 5 × 1013 ions/cm2 showed a sharp increase at a high frequency. Results revealed that at a higher applied frequency and different Cu ion doses, the bonds started to rotate resulting in dielectric transition with accessible flexible polar bonds. This will lead to chemical changes in the polymer chain by the formation of complex charge transfer, which will enhance the AC conductivity [44].

4. Conclusions

In this work, a new route was adopted to embed metallic Cu ions in a PMMA matrix to modify the physical properties. PMMA samples were bombarded with 500 keV Cu+ ions with fluencies ranging from 1 × 1012 to 1 × 1014 ions/cm2. XRD study indicated relatively less variation with a higher dose of the ions. FTIR spectral study on the implantation of Cu ions revealed the existence of a C=C group and for the different fluence of the copper ions, the intensity of the observed bands decreased. An optical band gap (Eg) was observed up to 3.9 eV for the pristine samples, while a significant reduction in the bandgap, up to 3.05 eV, was observed using Cu inclusion. The dielectric measurement of the pristine and Cu implanted PMMA revealed that the implanted samples also showed a significant decreased in the value of the dielectric constant. The conclusion drawn from the above investigations suggetsted the fruitful intercession of Cu ions in PMMA to modify the physical properties, which might be suitable for application in optoelectronic devices.

Author Contributions

A.N.A.; has made a substantial contribution to the concept, writing of the article, G.M.; drafted the article and revised it critically for important intellectual content, M.A.S.; Approved the experimental setup and all the parameters in Accelerator Lab, A.S.H.; Funding Acquisition and help in revision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Authors would like to thank King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) for supporting this work.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. El-Badry, B.A.; Zaki, M.; Abdul-Kader, A.; Hegazy, T.M.; Morsy, A.A. Ion bombardment of poly-allyl-diglycol-carbonate (CR-39). Vacuum 2009, 83, 1138–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Charrier, J.-M. Polymeric Materials and Processing: Plastics, Elastomers, and Composites; Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co: Munich, Germany, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  3. Popok, V. Ion implantation of polymers: Formation of nanoparticulate materials. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2012, 30, 1. [Google Scholar]
  4. Du, W.; Slaný, M.; Wang, X.; Chen, G.; Zhang, J. The inhibition property and mechanism of a novel low molecular weight zwitterionic copolymer for improving wellbore stability. Polymers 2020, 12, 708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Shah, S.; Qureshi, A.; Singh, N.L.; Kulriya, P.K.; Singh, K.P.; Avasthi, D.K. Structural and chemical modification of polymer composite by proton irradiation. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2009, 203, 2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kosobrodova, E.; Kondyurin, A.; Chrzanowski, W.; McCulloch, D.G.; McKenzie, D.R.; Bilek, M.M. Optical properties and oxidation of carbonized and cross-linked structures formed in polycarbonate by plasma immersion ion implantation. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2014, 329, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mondal, S.; Das, S.; Nandi, A.K. A review on recent advances in polymer and peptide hydrogels. Soft Matter 2020, 16, 1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Nathawat, R.; Kumar, A.; Kulshrestha, V.; Vijay, Y.K.; Kobayashi, T.; Kanjilal, D. Study of surface activation of PET by low energy (keV) Ni+ and N+ ion implantation. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2008, 266, 4749–4756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Allayarov, S.R.; Olkhov, Y.A.; Dixon, D.A.; Allayarov, R.S. Influence of Accelerated Protons on the Molecular–Topological Structure of Polyethylene. High Energy Chem. 2020, 54, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pirker, L.; Krajnc, A.P.; Malec, J.; Radulović, V.; Gradišek, A.; Jelen, A.; Remškar, M.; Mekjavić, I.B.; Kovač, J.; Mozetič, M.; et al. Sterilization of polypropylene membranes of facepiece respirators by ionizing radiation. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 619, 118756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kumar, R.; Ali, S.A.; Singh, P.; De, U.; Virk, H.S.; Prasad, R. Physical and chemical response of 145 MeV Ne6+ ion irradiated polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) polymer. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2011, 269, 1755–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hadjichristov, G.B.; Ivanov, V.; Faulques, E. Reflectivity modification of polymethylmethacrylate by silicon ion implantation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 254, 4820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ueda, M.; Kostov, K.G.; Beloto, A.F.; Leite, N.F.; Grigorov, K.G. Surface modification of polyethylene terephthalate by plasma immersion ion implantation. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2004, 186, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shekhawat, N.; Aggarwal, S.; Sharma, A.; Sharma, S.K.; Deshpande, S.K.; Nair, K.G. Surface disordering and its correlations with properties in argon implanted CR-39 polymer. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 109, 083513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, Q.; Yoon, S.; Ahn, J.; Rusli; Yang, H.; Yang, C.; Watt, F.; Teo, E.; Osipowice, T. Effects of high energetic He+ ion irradiation on the structure of polymeric hydrogenated amorphous carbon. Microelectron. J. 1999, 30, 801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ma, L.; Zhu, Y.; Feng, P.; Song, G.; Huang, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhang, J.; Fan, J.; Hou, H.; Guo, Z. Reinforcing carbon fiber epoxy composites with triazine derivatives functionalized graphene oxide modified sizing agent. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 176, 107078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dhillon, R.K.; Singh, P.; Gupta, S.K.; Singh, S.; Kumar, R. Study of high energy (MeV) N6+ ion and gamma radiation induced modifications in low density polyethylene (LDPE) polymer. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2013, 301, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rai, V.; Mukherjee, C.; Jain, B. UV-Vis and FTIR spectroscopy of gamma irradiated polymethyl methacrylate. Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 2017, 55, 775. [Google Scholar]
  19. Öchsner, R.; Kluge, A.; Zechel-Malonn, S.; Gong, L.; Ryssel, H. Improvement of surface properties of polymers by ion implantation. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 1993, 80, 1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stepanov, A.L.; Popok, V.N.; Khaibullin, I.B.; Kreibig, U. Optical properties of polymethylmethacrilate with implanted silver nanoparticles. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2002, 191, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Boldyryeva, H.; Umeda, N.; Plaksin, O.A.; Takeda, Y.; Kishimoto, N. High-fluence implantation of negative metal ions into polymers for surface modification and nanoparticle formation. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2005, 196, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Umeda, N.; Bandourko, V.V.; Vasilets, V.N.; Kishimoto, N. Metal precipitation process in polymers induced by ion implantation of 60 keV Cu−. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2003, 206, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sangeetha, R.; Madheswari, D.; Priya, G. Fabrication of poly (methyl methacrylate)/Ce/Cu substituted apatite/Egg white (Ovalbumin) biocomposite owning adjustable properties: Towards bone tissue rejuvenation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2018, 187, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kumar, V.; Sonkawade, R.G.; Dhaliwal, A.S. High electronic excitation induced modifications by 100 MeV O7+ and 150 MeV Ni11+ ions in Makrofol KG polycarbonate film. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2012, 287, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mikšová, R.; Macková, A.; Pupikova, H.; Malinský, P.; Slepička, P.; Švorčík, V. Compositional, structural, and optical changes of polyimide implanted by 1.0 MeV Ni+ ions. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2017, 406, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Goyal, P.K.; Kumar, V.; Gupta, R.; Mahendia, S.; Kumar, S. Modification of polycarbonate surface by Ar+ ion implantation for various opto-electronic applications. Vacuum 2012, 86, 1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Popok, V.N.; Azarko, I.I.; Odzhaev, V.B.; Tóth, A.; Khaibullin, R.I. High fluence ion beam modification of polymer surfaces: EPR and XPS studies. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2001, 178, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Arif, S.; Rafique, M.S.; Saleemi, F.; Naab, F.; Toader, O.; Sagheer, R.; Bashir, S.; Zia, R.; Siraj, K.; Iqbal, S. Surface topographical and structural analysis of Ag+-implanted polymethylmethacrylate. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2016, 381, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sharma, A.; Chawla, M.; Gupta, D.; Bura, M.; Shekhawat, N.; Aggarwal, S. Low energy B+ implantation induced optical and structural characteristics of aliphatic and aromatic polymers. Vacuum 2019, 159, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Popok, V.N.; Nuzhdin, V.I.; Valeev, V.F.; Stepanov, A.L. Copper nanoparticles synthesized in polymers by ion implantation: Surface morphology and optical properties of the nanocomposites. J. Mater. Res. 2015, 30, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Banerjee, S.; Deka, M.; Kumar, A.; De, U. Ion Irradiation Effects in some Electro-Active and Engineering Polymers Studies by Conventional and Novel Techniques. Defect Diffus. Forum 2013, 341, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tuleushev, A.Z.; Harrison, F.E.; Kozlovskiy, A.L.; Zdorovets, M.V. Assessment of the Irradiation Exposure of PET Film with Swift Heavy Ions Using the Interference-Free Transmission UV-Vis Transmission Spectra. Polymers 2021, 3, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ziegler, J.F.; Biersack, J.P.; Ziegler, M.D. The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids, SRIM Software. 2008. Available online: http://www.srim.org/ (accessed on 1 January 2008).
  34. Lovell, R.; Windle, A.H. Determination of the local conformation of PMMA from wide-angle X-ray scattering. Polymer 1981, 22, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ravindrachary, V.; Bhajantri, R.F.; Praveena, S.D.; Poojary, B.; Dutta, D.; Pujari, P.K. Optical and microstructural studies on electron irradiated PMMA: A positron annihilation study. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2010, 95, 1083. [Google Scholar]
  36. Slany, M.; Jankovic, L.; Madejova, J. Structural characterization of organo-montmorillonites prepared from a series of primary alkylamines salts: Mid-IR and near-IR study. Appl. Clay Sci. 2019, 176, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sugitani, M. Ion implantation technology and ion sources. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2014, 85, C315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Rajesh, K.; Crasta, V.; Kumar, N.R.; Shetty, G.; Rekha, P.D. Structural, optical, mechanical and dielectric properties of titanium dioxide doped PVA/PVP nanocomposite. J. Polym. Res. 2019, 26, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mahendia, S.; Tomar, A.K.; Kumar, S. Nano-Ag doping induced changes in optical and electrical behaviour of PVA films. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2011, 176, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bhajantri, R.F.; Ravindrachary, V.; Harisha, A.; Crasta, V.; Nayak, S.P.; Poojary, B. Microstructural studies on BaCl2 doped poly (vinyl alcohol). Polymer 2006, 47, 3591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kumar, N.R.; Crasta, V.; Praveen, B.M. Dielectric and electric conductivity studies of PVA (Mowiol 10-98) doped with MWCNTs and WO3 nanocomposites films. Mater. Res. Express 2016, 3, 055012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Blout, E.R.; Fields, M. Absorption Spectra. V. The Ultraviolet and Visible Spectra of Certain Polyene Aldehydes and Polyene Azines1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hesse, M.; Meier, H.; Zeeh, B.; Hesse, M.; Meier, H.; Zeeh, B. Spectroscopic Methods in Organic Chemistry; Thieme Publishing Group: Stuttgart, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  44. Phang, S.W.; Tadokoro, M.; Watanabe, J.; Kuramoto, N. Synthesis, characterization and microwave absorption property of doped polyaniline nanocomposites containing TiO2 nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes. Synth. Met. 2008, 158, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram for ion beam interaction with Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) materials.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram for ion beam interaction with Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) materials.
Polymers 13 00973 g001
Figure 2. (a) Pristine and (b) Cu-implanted PMMA sheets with maximum dose of 1 × 1014 ions/cm2.
Figure 2. (a) Pristine and (b) Cu-implanted PMMA sheets with maximum dose of 1 × 1014 ions/cm2.
Polymers 13 00973 g002
Figure 3. Penetration depth profile of Cu ions, as a function of the implant energy using the Monte Carlo SRIM code.
Figure 3. Penetration depth profile of Cu ions, as a function of the implant energy using the Monte Carlo SRIM code.
Polymers 13 00973 g003
Figure 4. Effect of Cu ion implantation on PMMA using different fluences with a beam energy of 500 KeV.
Figure 4. Effect of Cu ion implantation on PMMA using different fluences with a beam energy of 500 KeV.
Polymers 13 00973 g004
Figure 5. FTIR spectrum of Cu+ implanted PMMA for different doses.
Figure 5. FTIR spectrum of Cu+ implanted PMMA for different doses.
Polymers 13 00973 g005
Figure 6. Photoluminescence spectra of pristine and Cu+ implanted PMMA.
Figure 6. Photoluminescence spectra of pristine and Cu+ implanted PMMA.
Polymers 13 00973 g006
Figure 7. Dose vs. obtained intensity.
Figure 7. Dose vs. obtained intensity.
Polymers 13 00973 g007
Figure 8. UV-vis absorption spectra for pristine and Cu+ implanted samples.
Figure 8. UV-vis absorption spectra for pristine and Cu+ implanted samples.
Polymers 13 00973 g008
Figure 9. Tauc’s plot for pristine and Cu implanted samples.
Figure 9. Tauc’s plot for pristine and Cu implanted samples.
Polymers 13 00973 g009
Figure 10. Variation in the real part of dielectric constant (ε′) with frequency.
Figure 10. Variation in the real part of dielectric constant (ε′) with frequency.
Polymers 13 00973 g010
Figure 11. Variation in the real part of dielectric constant (ε′′) with frequency.
Figure 11. Variation in the real part of dielectric constant (ε′′) with frequency.
Polymers 13 00973 g011
Figure 12. Variation of energy loss of pristine and Cu-ion-implanted samples.
Figure 12. Variation of energy loss of pristine and Cu-ion-implanted samples.
Polymers 13 00973 g012
Figure 13. Variation of AC conductivity with different doses of Cu ions.
Figure 13. Variation of AC conductivity with different doses of Cu ions.
Polymers 13 00973 g013
Table 1. Fluencies of 500 keV Cu+1 ions used for ion implantation.
Table 1. Fluencies of 500 keV Cu+1 ions used for ion implantation.
PMMA SamplesFluence (ions/cm2)
PMMA 10
PMMA 21 × 1012
PMMA 31 × 1013
PMMA 41 × 1014
Table 2. Position of different bands of the FTIR spectra for pristine and implanted PMMA.
Table 2. Position of different bands of the FTIR spectra for pristine and implanted PMMA.
Band PositionWave Number (cm−1)
C-H asymmetric stretching2996.53
C-H symmetric stretching2948.95
CH2 stretching vibration2853.07
C=O stretching vibration1721.77
C-H bending vibration1387.28
C-O stretching vibration1240.28
C-O-CH39984.00
O-CH3901.53
CH2841.87
C-C750.26
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Akhtar, A.N.; Murtaza, G.; Shafique, M.A.; Haidyrah, A.S. Effect of Cu Ions Implantation on Structural, Electronic, Optical and Dielectric Properties of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA). Polymers 2021, 13, 973. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13060973

AMA Style

Akhtar AN, Murtaza G, Shafique MA, Haidyrah AS. Effect of Cu Ions Implantation on Structural, Electronic, Optical and Dielectric Properties of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA). Polymers. 2021; 13(6):973. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13060973

Chicago/Turabian Style

Akhtar, Athar N., G. Murtaza, M. Ahsan Shafique, and Ahmed S. Haidyrah. 2021. "Effect of Cu Ions Implantation on Structural, Electronic, Optical and Dielectric Properties of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA)" Polymers 13, no. 6: 973. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13060973

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop