Next Article in Journal
Carbon-Doping as Efficient Strategy for Improving Photocatalytic Activity of Polysilicon Supported Pd in Hydrogen Evolution from Formic Acid
Next Article in Special Issue
Wrinkling on Stimuli-Responsive Functional Polymer Surfaces as a Promising Strategy for the Preparation of Effective Antibacterial/Antibiofouling Surfaces
Previous Article in Journal
Exposure of Von Willebrand Factor Cleavage Site in A1A2A3-Fragment under Extreme Hydrodynamic Shear
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biopolymer Hydrogel Scaffolds Containing Doxorubicin as A Localized Drug Delivery System for Inhibiting Lung Cancer Cell Proliferation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Characterisation and Modelling of an Artificial Lens Capsule Mimicking Accommodation of Human Eyes

Polymers 2021, 13(22), 3916; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13223916
by Huidong Wei 1,2,*, James S. Wolffsohn 1,*, Otavio Gomes de Oliveira 2 and Leon N. Davies 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Polymers 2021, 13(22), 3916; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13223916
Submission received: 28 September 2021 / Revised: 29 October 2021 / Accepted: 3 November 2021 / Published: 12 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Polymers for Biomedical Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript entitled "Characterisation and modelling of an artificial lens capsule mimicking accommodation of human eyes" is a significant study that provides useful information for research in health field. The manuscript is well written and the results are clearly presented. The methodology is robust, and the experiments were carefully done.

A few minor recommendations are listed below:

  1. The abstract section should be re-organized. It seems too generic, and it does not adequately summarize the results of the study.
  2. Current options in this field present limitations that lead to the need to expand and development of knowledge and, in this sense, from my point of view, the limitations of this study should be discussed, so as to open new directions. Additionally, the approach enables relatively control over material’s features.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

1. Introduction

In the line 49 "combing" should be changed to "combining".

2. Materials and methods

What was the catalyst used for?

Was the material purified after reaction with catalyst?

Was the catalyst left in the material analyzed?

Was the material analyzed to confirm the appropriate chemical structure?

Was the chemical structure of prepared strips and lens compared?

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The author response is sufficient.

Back to TopTop