Approaches in Animal Proteins and Natural Polysaccharides Application for Food Packaging: Edible Film Production and Quality Estimation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Biopolymers Used for Food Packaging
2.1. Starch
2.2. Cellulose
2.3. Pectin
2.4. Chitosan
2.5. Alginate
2.6. Casein
2.7. Collagen
2.8. Gelatin
3. Approaches for the Production of Biopolymer-Based Films and Coatings
3.1. Methods of Forming Edible Films
3.1.1. Casting Method
3.1.2. Extrusion Method
3.1.3. Compression Molding
3.1.4. Injection Molding
3.2. Methods of Forming Coatings
3.2.1. Dipping Method
3.2.2. Spraying Method
3.3. Edible Films Composition
3.3.1. Edible Starch Films
3.3.2. Edible Cellulose Films
3.3.3. Edible Pectin Films
3.3.4. Edible Chitosan Films
3.3.5. Edible Alginate Films
3.3.6. Edible Casein Films
3.3.7. Edible Collagen Films
3.3.8. Edible Gelatin Films
3.4. Ways of Edible Films Improving, Production and Application in Food Pachaging Based on Biopolymer Properties
3.5. Edible Composite Films
3.6. Safety Requirements for Components of Edible Films
4. Methods for Estimating Edible Films Quality
4.1. Basic Requirements for Testing the Condition of Films
4.2. Mechanical Properties
4.3. Physico-Chemical Properties
4.3.1. Water Vapor Permeability
4.3.2. Gaseous Permeability
4.4. Hydration Properties
4.4.1. Films Solubility
4.4.2. Swelling Index
4.4.3. Contact Angle Measurements
4.5. Scanning Electron Microscopy
5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wohner, B.; Pauer, E.; Heinrich, V.; Tacker, M. Packaging-Related Food Losses and Waste: An Overview of Drivers and Issues. Sustainability 2019, 11, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Arkoun, M.; Daigle, F.; Holley, R.A.; Heuzey, M.C.; Ajji, A. Chitosan-based nanofibers as bioactive meat packaging materials. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2018, 31, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreira, D.; Gullón, B.; Gullón, P.; Gomes, A.; Tavaria, F. Bioactive packaging using antioxidant extracts for the prevention of microbial food-spoilage. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 3273–3282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garavand, F.; Rouhi, M.; Razavi, S.H.; Cacciotti, I.; Mohammadi, R. Improving the integrity of natural biopolymer films used in food packaging by crosslinking approach: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 104, 687–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iwata, T. Biodegradable and Bio-Based Polymers: Future Prospects of Eco-Friendly Plastics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 3210–3215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kabir, E.; Kaur, R.; Lee, J.; Kim, K.-H.; Kwon, E.E. Prospects of biopolymer technology as an alternative option for non-degradable plastics and sustainable management of plastic wastes. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 258, 120536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Datta, J.; Kopczyńska, P. From polymer waste to potential main industrial products: Actual state of recycling and recovering. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 46, 905–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faraca, G.; Astrup, T. Plastic waste from recycling centres: Characterisation and evaluation of plastic recyclability. Waste Manag. 2019, 95, 388–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miandad, R.; Barakat, M.A.; Aburiazaiza, A.S.; Rehan, M.; Nizami, A.S. Catalytic pyrolysis of plastic waste: A review. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2016, 102, 822–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mwanza, B.G.; Mbohwa, C. Drivers to Sustainable Plastic Solid Waste Recycling: A Review. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 8, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ragaert, K.; Delva, L.; Van Geem, K. Mechanical and chemical recycling of solid plastic waste. Waste Manag. 2017, 69, 24–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wróblewska-Krepsztul, J.; Rydzkowski, T. Pyrolysis and incineration in polymer waste management system. J. Mech. Energy Eng. 2020, 3, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jakobek, L. Food packaging materials with polyphenols as active compounds. Meso 2019, 21, 469–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stoica, M.; Marian Antohi, V.; Laura Zlati, M.; Stoica, D. The financial impact of replacing plastic packaging by biodegradable biopolymers—A smart solution for the food industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 277, 124013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popović, S.Z.; Lazić, V.L.; Hromiš, N.M.; Šuput, D.Z.; Bulut, S.N. Chapter 8—Biopolymer Packaging Materials for Food Shelf-Life Prolongation. In Biopolymers for Food Design, 1st ed.; Grumezescu, A.M., Holban, A.M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; Volume 10, pp. 223–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gómez-Estaca, J.; Gavara, R.; Catalá, R.; Hernández-Muñoz, P. The Potential of Proteins for Producing Food Packaging Materials: A Review. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2016, 29, 203–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nechita, P.; Roman (Iana-Roman), M. Review on Polysaccharides Used in Coatings for Food Packaging Papers. Coatings 2020, 10, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weber, C.J.; Haugaard, V.; Festersen, R.; Bertelsen, G. Production and applications of biobased packaging materials for the food industry. Food Addit. Contam. 2002, 19, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, A.; Mangaraj, S.; Singh, R.; Das, K.; Kumar, N.; Arora, S. Biopolymers as packaging material in food and allied industry. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2018, 6, 2411–2418. [Google Scholar]
- Adeyeye, O.A.; Sadiku, E.R.; Babu Reddy, A.; Ndamase, A.S.; Makgatho, G.; Sellamuthu, P.S.; Perumal, A.B.; Nambiar, R.B.; Fasiku, V.O.; Ibrahim, I.D.; et al. The Use of Biopolymers in Food Packaging. In Green Biopolymers and their Nanocomposites. Materials Horizons: From Nature to Nanomaterials, 1st ed.; Gnanasekaran, D., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 137–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srivastava, P.; Bano, K.; Zaheer, M.R.; Kuddus, M. Biodegradable Smart Biopolymers for Food Packaging: Sustainable Approach Toward Green Environment. In Bio-Based Materials for Food Packaging, 1st ed.; Ahmed, S., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 197–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, T.; Ma, C.; Aytac, Z.; Hu, X.; Ng, K.W.; White, J.C.; Demokritou, P. Enhancing Agrichemical Delivery and Seedling Development with Biodegradable, Tunable, Biopolymer-Based Nanofiber Seed Coatings. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 9537–9548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhumal, C.V.; Sarkar, P. Composite edible films and coatings from food-grade biopolymers. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 4369–4383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghanbarzadeh, B.; Oleyaei, S.A.; Almasi, H. Nanostructured Materials Utilized in Biopolymer-based Plastics for Food Packaging Applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 55, 1699–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wicochea-Rodríguez, J.D.; Chalier, P.; Ruiz, T.; Gastaldi, E. Active Food Packaging Based on Biopolymers and Aroma Compounds: How to Design and Control the Release. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cazón, P.; Velazquez, G.; Ramírez, J.A.; Vázquez, M. Polysaccharide-based films and coatings for food packaging: A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 68, 136–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed, S.A.A.; El-Sakhawy, M.; El-Sakhawy, M.A.-M. Polysaccharides, Protein and Lipid -Based Natural Edible Films in Food Packaging: A Review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 238, 116178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakur, R.; Pristijono, P.; Scarlett, C.J.; Bowyer, M.; Singh, S.P.; Vuong, Q.V. Starch-based films: Major factors affecting their properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 132, 1079–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Basiak, E.; Lenart, A.; Debeaufort, F. Effect of starch type on the physico-chemical properties of edible films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 98, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kadokawa, J.-i. Preparation and Applications of Amylose Supramolecules by Means of Phosphorylase-Catalyzed Enzymatic Polymerization. Polymers 2012, 4, 116–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lemos, P.V.F.; Barbosa, L.S.; Ramos, I.G.; Coelho, R.E.; Druzian, J.I. Characterization of amylose and amylopectin fractions separated from potato, banana, corn, and cassava starches. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 132, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertoft, E.; Blennow, A. Chapter 3—Structure of Potato Starch. In Advances in Potato Chemistry and Technology, 2nd ed.; Singh, J., Kaur, L., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 57–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, J.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, B.; Qiao, D.; Pu, H.; Liu, S.; Li, L. Structural features and thermal property of propionylated starches with different amylose/amylopectin ratio. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 97, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keeratiburana, T.; Hansen, A.R.; Soontaranon, S.; Blennow, A.; Tongta, S. Porous high amylose rice starch modified by amyloglucosidase and maltogenic α-amylase. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 230, 115611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, J.; Colussi, R.; McCarthy, O.J.; Kaur, L. Chapter 8—Potato Starch and Its Modification. In Advances in Potato Chemistry and Technology, 2nd ed.; Singh, J., Kaur, L., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 195–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Prakash, S.; Nicholson, T.M.; Fitzgerald, M.A.; Gilbert, R.G. The importance of amylose and amylopectin fine structure for textural properties of cooked rice grains. Food Chem. 2016, 196, 702–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Palviainen, P.; Heinämäki, J.; Myllärinen, P.; Lahtinen, R.; Yliruusi, J.; Forssell, P. Corn Starches as Film Formers in Aqueous-Based Film Coating. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2001, 6, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shevkani, K.; Singh, N.; Bajaj, R.; Kaur, A. Wheat starch production, structure, functionality and applications-a review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 52, 38–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Semeijn, C.; Buwalda, P.L. Chapter 9—Potato Starch. In Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition, 2nd ed.; Sjöö, M., Nilsson, L., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2018; pp. 353–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, B.; Bilal Khan Niazi, M.; Samin, G.; Jahan, Z. Thermoplastic Starch: A Possible Biodegradable Food Packaging Material-A Review. J. Food Process Eng. 2017, 40, e12447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gironès, J.; López, J.P.; Mutjé, P.; Carvalho, A.J.F.; Curvelo, A.A.S.; Vilaseca, F. Natural fiber-reinforced thermoplastic starch composites obtained by melt processing. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2012, 72, 858–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Díaz-Galindo, E.P.; Nesic, A.; Cabrera-Barjas, G.; Mardones, C.; von Baer, D.; Bautista-Baños, S.; Dublan Garcia, O. Physical-Chemical Evaluation of Active Food Packaging Material Based on Thermoplastic Starch Loaded with Grape cane Extract. Molecules 2020, 25, 1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dorigato, A.; Perin, D.; Pegoretti, A. Effect of the Temperature and of the Drawing Conditions on the Fracture Behaviour of Thermoplastic Starch Films for Packaging Applications. J. Polym. Environ. 2020, 28, 3244–3255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmitt, H.; Guidez, A.; Prashantha, K.; Soulestin, J.; Lacrampe, M.F.; Krawczak, P. Studies on the effect of storage time and plasticizers on the structural variations in thermoplastic starch. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 115, 364–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López, O.V.; Castillo, L.A.; García, M.A.; Villar, M.A.; Barbosa, S.E. Food packaging bags based on thermoplastic corn starch reinforced with talc nanoparticles. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 43, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jabeen, N.; Majid, I.; Nayik, G.A.; Yildiz, F. Bioplastics and food packaging: A review. Cogent Food Agric. 2015, 1, 1117749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sengupta, T.; Han, J.H. Chapter 4—Surface Chemistry of Food, Packaging, and Biopolymer Materials. In Innovations in Food Packaging, 2nd ed.; Han, J.H., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 51–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gardner, K.H.; Blackwell, J. The structure of native cellulose. Biopolymers 1974, 13, 1975–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trache, D.; Hussin, M.H.; Hui Chuin, C.T.; Sabar, S.; Fazita, M.R.N.; Taiwo, O.F.A.; Hassan, T.M.; Haafiz, M.K.M. Microcrystalline cellulose: Isolation, characterization and bio-composites application—A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 93, 789–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Trache, D.; Hussin, M.H.; Haafiz, M.K.M.; Thakur, V.K. Recent progress in cellulose nanocrystals: Sources and production. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 1763–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mishra, S.; Kharkar, P.S.; Pethe, A.M. Biomass and waste materials as potential sources of nanocrystalline cellulose: Comparative review of preparation methods (2016–Till date). Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 207, 418–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, Y.; Moser, C.; Lindström, M.E.; Henriksson, G.; Li, J. Cellulose Nanofibers from Softwood, Hardwood, and Tunicate: Preparation–Structure–Film Performance Interrelation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 13508–13519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heinze, T.; El Seoud, O.A.; Koschella, A. Production and Characteristics of Cellulose from Different Sources. In Cellulose Derivatives, 1st ed.; Springer Series on Polymer and Composite Materials; Heinze, T., El Seoud, O.A., Koschella, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B.; Azuma, J.; Uyama, H. Preparation and characterization of a transparent amorphous cellulose film. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 2900–2907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azeredo, H.M.C.; Barud, H.; Farinas, C.S.; Vasconcellos, V.M.; Claro, A.M. Bacterial Cellulose as a Raw Material for Food and Food Packaging Applications. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2019, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Azeredo, H.M.C.; Rosa, M.F.; Mattoso, L.H.C. Nanocellulose in bio-based food packaging applications. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 97, 664–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robertson, G.L. Food Packaging Principles and Practice, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012; 733p. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Y.; Li, Q.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Li, B.; Liu, S. Cellulose-based peptidopolysaccharides as cationic antimicrobial package films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 128, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Da Silva Filipini, G.; Romani, V.P.; Guimarães Martins, V. Biodegradable and active-intelligent films based on methylcellulose and jambolão (Syzygium cumini) skins extract for food packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 109, 106139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López de Dicastillo, C.; Rodríguez, F.; Guarda, A.; Galotto, M.J. Antioxidant films based on cross-linked methyl cellulose and native Chilean berry for food packaging applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 136, 1052–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, S.; Krochta, J.M. Starch-methylcellulose-whey protein film properties. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 47, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Debeaufort, F. Lipid hydrophobicity and physical state effects on the properties of bilayer edible films. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 180, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heinze, T.; Pfeiffer, K. Studies on the synthesis and characterization of carboxymethylcellulose. Die Angew. Makromol. Chem. 1999, 266, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, N.; Saha, N.; Kitano, T.; Saha, P. Biodegradation of PVP–CMC hydrogel film: A useful food packaging material. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 89, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malhotra, B.; Keshwani, A.; Kharkwal, H. Natural polymer based cling films for food packaging. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 7, 10–18. [Google Scholar]
- Rachtanapun, P.; Rattanapanone, N. Synthesis and characterization of carboxymethyl cellulose powder and films from Mimosa pigra. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 122, 3218–3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, X.; Lu, W.; Sun, C.; Khalesi, H.; Mata, A.; Andaleeb, R.; Fang, Y. Cellulose and cellulose derivatives: Different colloidal states and food-related applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 255, 117334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Youssef, A.M.; El-Sayed, S.M. Bionanocomposites materials for food packaging applications: Concepts and future outlook. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 193, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jolie, R.P.; Duvetter, T.; Van Loey, A.M.; Hendrickx, M.E. Pectin methylesterase and its proteinaceous inhibitor: A review. Carbohydr. Res. 2010, 345, 2583–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumar, M.; Tomar, M.; Saurabh, V.; Mahajan, T.; Punia, S.; Contreras, M. del M.; Rudra, S.G.; Kaur, C.; Kennedy, J.F. Emerging trends in pectin extraction and its anti-microbial functionalization using natural bioactives for application in food packaging. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 105, 223–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Espitia, P.; Avena-Bustillos, R.J.; Du, W.-X.; Teófilo, R.F.; Soares, N.F.F.; McHugh, T.H. Optimal antimicrobial formulation and physical–mechanical properties of edible films based on açaí and pectin for food preservation. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2014, 2, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Espitia, P.; Du, W.-X.; Avena-Bustillos, R. de J.; Soares, N. de F.F.; McHugh, T.H. Edible films from pectin: Physical-mechanical and antimicrobial properties—A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2014, 35, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, R.K.; Banthia, A.K.; Majeed, A.B.A. Pectin based formulations for biomedical applications: A review. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2012, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Gómez, B.; Gullón, B.; Yáñez, R.; Schols, H.; Alonso, J.L. Prebiotic potential of pectins and pectic oligosaccharides derived from lemon peel wastes and sugar beet pulp: A comparative evaluation. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 20, 108–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciriminna, R.; Fidalgo, A.; Delisi, R.; Ilharco, L.M.; Pagliaro, M. Pectin production and global market. Agro Food Ind. Hi Tech 2016, 27, 17–20. [Google Scholar]
- Raei, M.; Shahidi, F.; Farhoodi, M.; Jafari, S.M.; Rafe, A. Application of whey protein-pectin nano-complex carriers for loading of lactoferrin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 105, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sganzerla, W.G.; Rosa, G.B.; Ferreira, A.L.A.; Rosa, C.G.d.; Beling, P.C.; Xavier, L.O.; Hansen, C.M.; Ferrareze, J.P.; Nunes, M.R.; Barreto, P.L.M.; et al. Bioactive food packaging based on starch, citric pectin and functionalized with Acca sellowiana waste by-product: Characterization and application in the postharvest conservation of apple. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 147, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valdés, A.; Burgos, N.; Jiménez, A.; Garrigós, M. Natural Pectin Polysaccharides as Edible Coatings. Coatings 2015, 5, 865–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rodríguez-Núñez, J.R.; Madera-Santana, T.J.; Sánchez-Machado, D.I.; López-Cervantes, J.; Soto Valdez, H. Chitosan/Hydrophilic Plasticizer-Based Films: Preparation, Physicochemical and Antimicrobial Properties. J. Polym. Environ. 2014, 22, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaczmarek, M.B.; Struszczyk-Swita, K.; Li, X.; Szczęsna-Antczak, M.; Daroch, M. Enzymatic Modifications of Chitin, Chitosan, and Chitooligosaccharides. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Younes, I.; Rinaudo, M. Chitin and Chitosan Preparation from Marine Sources. Structure, Properties and Applications. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 1133–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bastiaens, L.; Soetemans, L.; D’Hondt, E.; Elst, K. Chapter 1 Sources of Chitin and Chitosan and their Isolation. In Chitin and Chitosan: Properties and Applications, 1st ed.; van den Broek, L.A.M., Boeriu, C.G., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdou, E.S.; Nagy, K.S.A.; Elsabee, M.Z. Extraction and characterization of chitin and chitosan from local sources. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 1359–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kaya, M.; Cakmak, Y.S.; Baran, T.; Asan-Ozusaglam, M.; Mentes, A.; Tozak, K.O. New chitin, chitosan, and O-carboxymethyl chitosan sources from resting eggs of Daphnia longispina (Crustacea); with physicochemical characterization, and antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2014, 19, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majtán, J.; Bíliková, K.; Markovič, O.; Gróf, J.; Kogan, G.; Šimúth, J. Isolation and characterization of chitin from bumblebee (Bombus terrestris). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2007, 40, 237–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yen, M.-T.; Mau, J.-L. Physico-chemical characterization of fungal chitosan from shiitake stipes. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 40, 472–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasul, R.M.; Muniandy, M.T.; Zakaria, Z.; Shah, K.; Chee, C.F.; Dabbagh, A.; Rahman, N.A.; Wong, T.W. A review on chitosan and its development as pulmonary particulate anti-infective and anti-cancer drug carriers. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 250, 116800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yeul, V.S.; Rayalu, S.S. Unprecedented Chitin and Chitosan: A Chemical Overview. J. Polym. Environ. 2013, 21, 606–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elieh-Ali-Komi, D.; Hamblin, M.R. Chitin and Chitosan: Production and Application of Versatile Biomedical Nanomaterials. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2016, 4, 411–427. [Google Scholar]
- Muxika, A.; Etxabide, A.; Uranga, J.; Guerrero, P.; de la Caba, K. Chitosan as a bioactive polymer: Processing, properties and applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 105, 1358–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jayakumar, R.; Nwe, N.; Tokura, S.; Tamura, H. Sulfated chitin and chitosan as novel biomaterials. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2007, 40, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Domján, A.; Bajdik, J.; Pintye-Hódi, K. Understanding of the Plasticizing Effects of Glycerol and PEG 400 on Chitosan Films Using Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 4667–4673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Adhikari, R.; Guo, Q.; Adhikari, B. Preparation and characterization of glycerol plasticized (high-amylose) starch–chitosan films. J. Food Eng. 2013, 116, 588–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilbao-Sainz, C.; Chiou, B.-S.; Williams, T.; Wood, D.; Du, W.-X.; Sedej, I.; Ban, Z.; Rodov, V.; Poverenov, E.; Vinokur, Y.; et al. Vitamin D-fortified chitosan films from mushroom waste. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 167, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kalaycıoğlu, Z.; Torlak, E.; Akın-Evingür, G.; Özen, İ.; Erim, F.B. Antimicrobial and physical properties of chitosan films incorporated with turmeric extract. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 101, 882–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, M.H.; Kim, S.Y.; Park, H.J. Effect of halloysite nanoclay on the physical, mechanical, and antioxidant properties of chitosan films incorporated with clove essential oil. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 84, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parreidt, T.S.; Müller, K.; Schmid, M. Alginate-Based Edible Films and Coatings for Food Packaging Applications. Foods 2018, 7, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Emmerichs, N.; Wingender, J.; Flemming, H.-C.; Mayer, C. Interaction between alginates and manganese cations: Identification of preferred cation binding sites. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2004, 34, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans, L.R.; Linker, A. Production and Characterization of the Slime Polysaccharide of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 1973, 116, 915–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hay, I.D.; Rehman, Z.U.; Moradali, M.F.; Wang, Y.; Rehm, B.H.A. Microbial alginate production, modification and its applications. Microb. Biotechnol. 2013, 6, 637–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Urtuvia, V.; Maturana, N.; Acevedo, F.; Peña, C.; Díaz-Barrera, A. Bacterial alginate production: An overview of its biosynthesis and potential industrial production. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 33, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flores, C.; Díaz-Barrera, A.; Martínez, F.; Galindo, E.; Peña, C. Role of oxygen in the polymerization and de-polymerization of alginate produced by Azotobacter vinelandii. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2015, 90, 356–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hay, I.D.; Wang, Y.; Moradali, M.F.; Rehman, Z.U.; Rehm, B.H.A. Genetics and regulation of bacterial alginate production. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 2997–3011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Draget, K.I. Chapter 29 Alginates. In Handbook of Hydrocolloids, 2nd ed.; Phillips, G.O., Williams, P.A., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, UK, 2009; pp. 807–828. [Google Scholar]
- Davidson, I.W.; Sutherland, I.W.; Lawson, C.J. Localization of O-Acetyl Groups of Bacterial Alginate. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1977, 98, 603–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Clementi, F. Alginate Production by Azotobacter Vinelandii. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 1997, 17, 327–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kimica Corporation. How to Use Alginates. Available online: https://kimica-algin.com/alginate/usage/ (accessed on 11 May 2020).
- U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Code for Federal Regulations Title 21 Part 184—Direct Food Substances Affirmed as Generally Recognized as Safe. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=184.1724 (accessed on 11 May 2020).
- Younes, M.; Aggett, P.; Aguilar, F.; Crebelli, R.; Filipič, M.; Frutos, M.J.; Galtier, P.; Gott, D.; Gundert-Remy, U.; Kuhnle, G.G.; et al. Re-evaluation of alginic acid and its sodium, potassium, ammonium and calcium salts (E 400–E 404) as food additives. EFSA J. 2017, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, Y.-J.; Yoon, K.-J.; Ko, S.-W. Preparation and properties of alginate superabsorbent filament fibers crosslinked with glutaraldehyde. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2000, 78, 1797–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makaremi, M.; Yousefi, H.; Cavallaro, G.; Lazzara, G.; Goh, C.B.S.; Lee, S.M.; Solouk, A.; Pasbakhsh, P. Safely Dissolvable and Healable Active Packaging Films Based on Alginate and Pectin. Polymers 2019, 11, 1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cao, L.; Lu, W.; Mata, A.; Nishinari, K.; Fang, Y. Egg-box model-based gelation of alginate and pectin: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 242, 116389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Wang, J.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, C.; Liu, H.; Bian, H.; Pan, Y.; Sun, J.; Han, W. Application of Protein-Based Films and Coatings for Food Packaging: A Review. Polymers 2019, 11, 2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Picchio, M.L.; Linck, Y.G.; Monti, G.A.; Gugliotta, L.M.; Minari, R.J.; Alvarez Igarzabal, C.I. Casein films crosslinked by tannic acid for food packaging applications. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 84, 424–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonnaillie, L.M.; Zhang, H.; Akkurt, S.; Yam, K.L.; Tomasula, P.M. Casein Films: The Effects of Formulation, Environmental Conditions and the Addition of Citric Pectin on the Structure and Mechanical Properties. Polymers 2014, 6, 2018–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiralt, A.; González-Martínez, C.; Vargas, M.; Atarés, L. 18 - Edible films and coatings from proteins. In Proteins in Food Processing, 2nd ed.; Yada, R.Y., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2018; pp. 477–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horne, D.S. Casein micelle structure: Models and muddles. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 11, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarode, A.R.; Sawale, P.D.; Khedkar, C.D.; Kalyankar, S.D.; Pawshe, R.D. Casein and Caseinate: Methods of Manufacture. In Encyclopedia of Food and Health, 1st ed.; Caballero, B., Finglas, P.M., Toldrá, F., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawrence, N.D.; Kentish, S.E.; O’Connor, A.J.; Barber, A.R.; Stevens, G.W. Microfiltration of skim milk using polymeric membranes for casein concentrate manufacture. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 60, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alekseev, G.V.; Khripov, A.A. Method of Rapid Remote Control of Casein Concentration in Dairy Products in Unopened Packages. J. Food Process Eng. 2015, 38, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carr, A.; Golding, M. Functional Milk Proteins Production and Utilization: Casein-Based Ingredients. In Advanced Dairy Chemistry, 4th ed.; McSweeney, P., O’Mahony, J., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016; Volume 1B, pp. 35–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chevalier, E.; Assezat, G.; Prochazka, F.; Oulahal, N. Development and characterization of a novel edible extruded sheet based on different casein sources and influence of the glycerol concentration. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 75, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.-L.; Gowen, A.A. Investigation of plasticizer aggregation problem in casein based biopolymer using chemical imaging. Talanta 2019, 193, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Farhan, A.; Hani, N.M. Characterization of edible packaging films based on semi-refined kappa-carrageenan plasticized with glycerol and sorbitol. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 64, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ucpinar Durmaz, B.; Aytac, A. Poly (vinyl alcohol) and casein films: The effects of glycerol amount on the properties of films. Res. Eng. Struct. Mater. 2019, 5, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, N.; Fu, Y.; He, J. Mechanical properties of gelatin films cross-linked, respectively, by ferulic acid and tannin acid. Food Hydrocoll. 2007, 21, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, H.-C.; Wang, B.-J.; Weng, Y.-M. Development and characterization of sodium caseinate edible films cross-linked with genipin. LWT 2020, 118, 108813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabbah, M.; Giosafatto, C.V.L.; Esposito, M.; Di Pierro, P.; Mariniello, L.; Porta, R. Chapter 21—Transglutaminase Cross-Linked Edible Films and Coatings for Food Applications. In Enzymes in Food Biotechnology, 1st ed.; Kuddus, M., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 369–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silvipriya, K.; Kumar, K.; Bhat, A.; Kumar, B.; John, A.; Lakshmanan, P. Collagen: Animal Sources and Biomedical Application. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bhagwat, P.K.; Dandge, P.B. Collagen and collagenolytic proteases: A review. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 15, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, E.; Yeon Kim, S.; Chun, T.; Byun, H.-J.; Lee, Y.M. Collagen scaffolds derived from a marine source and their biocompatibility. Biomaterials 2006, 27, 2951–2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, P.; Wu, G. Roles of dietary glycine, proline, and hydroxyproline in collagen synthesis and animal growth. Amino Acids 2018, 50, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goyal, D.; Goyal, A.; Brittberg, M. Consideration of religious sentiments while selecting a biological product for knee arthroscopy. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2013, 21, 1577–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avila Rodríguez, M.I.; Rodríguez Barroso, L.G.; Sánchez, M.L. Collagen: A review on its sources and potential cosmetic applications. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2018, 17, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sebald, A. Collagen. 2019. Available online: https://maxfacts.uk/treatment/other/medication/miscellaneous/collagen (accessed on 25 February 2021).
- Dong, C.; Lv, Y. Application of Collagen Scaffold in Tissue Engineering: Recent Advances and New Perspectives. Polymers 2016, 8, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jiang, Y.; Lan, W.; Sameen, D.E.; Ahmed, S.; Qin, W.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, H.; Dai, J.; He, L.; Liu, Y. Preparation and characterization of grass carp collagen-chitosan-lemon essential oil composite films for application as food packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 160, 340–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozlowska, J.; Sionkowska, A.; Skopinska-Wisniewska, J.; Piechowicz, K. Northern pike (Esox lucius) collagen: Extraction, characterization and potential application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 81, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramos, M.; Valdés, A.; Beltrán, A.; Garrigós, M. Gelatin-Based Films and Coatings for Food Packaging Applications. Coatings 2016, 6, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Holman, B.W.B.; Kerry, J.P.; Hopkins, D.L. Meat packaging solutions to current industry challenges: A review. Meat Sci. 2018, 144, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Etxabide, A.; Uranga, J.; Guerrero, P.; de la Caba, K. Development of active gelatin films by means of valorisation of food processing waste: A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 68, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaewruang, P.; Benjakul, S.; Prodpran, T. Molecular and functional properties of gelatin from the skin of unicorn leatherjacket as affected by extracting temperatures. Food Chem. 2013, 138, 1431–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mariod, A.A.; Fadol, H.A. Gelatin, source, extraction and industrial applications. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2013, 12, 135–147. [Google Scholar]
- Mhd Sarbon, N.; Badii, F.; Howell, N.K. Preparation and characterisation of chicken skin gelatin as an alternative to mammalian gelatin. Food Hydrocoll. 2013, 30, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gómez-Guillén, M.C.; Giménez, B.; López-Caballero, M.E.; Montero, M.P. Functional and bioactive properties of collagen and gelatin from alternative sources: A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2011, 25, 1813–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Karayannakidis, P.D.; Zotos, A. Fish Processing By-Products as a Potential Source of Gelatin: A Review. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2016, 25, 65–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siburian, W.Z.; Rochima, E.; Andriani, Y.; Praseptiangga, D. Fish gelatin (definition, manufacture, analysis of quality characteristics, and application): A review. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud. 2020, 8, 90–95. [Google Scholar]
- Kariduraganavar, M.Y.; Kittur, A.A.; Kamble, R.R. Chapter 1—Polymer Synthesis and Processing. In Natural and Synthetic Biomedical Polymers, 1st ed.; Kumbar, S.G., Laurencin, C.T., Deng, M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, B.; Lum, N.; Seow, L.; Lim, P.; Tan, L. Synthesis and Characterization of Types A and B Gelatin Methacryloyl for Bioink Applications. Materials 2016, 9, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aksun Tümerkan, E.T.; Cansu, Ü.; Boran, G.; Mac Regenstein, J.; Özoğul, F. Physiochemical and functional properties of gelatin obtained from tuna, frog and chicken skins. Food Chem. 2019, 287, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chandra, M.V.; Shamasundar, B.A. Texture Profile Analysis and Functional Properties of Gelatin from the Skin of Three Species of Fresh Water Fish. Int. J. Food Prop. 2015, 18, 572–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lassoued, I.; Jridi, M.; Nasri, R.; Dammak, A.; Hajji, M.; Nasri, M.; Barkia, A. Characteristics and functional properties of gelatin from thornback ray skin obtained by pepsin-aided process in comparison with commercial halal bovine gelatin. Food Hydrocoll. 2014, 41, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseini, S.F.; Rezaei, M.; Zandi, M.; Ghavi, F.F. Preparation and functional properties of fish gelatin–chitosan blend edible films. Food Chem. 2013, 136, 1490–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Scopel, B.S.; Ribeiro, M.E.; Dettmer, A.; Baldasso, C. Cornstarch-Gelatin Films: Commercial Gelatin Versus Chromed Leather Waste Gelatin and Evaluation of Drying Conditions. J. Polym. Environ. 2018, 26, 1998–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mellinas, C.; Valdés, A.; Ramos, M.; Burgos, N.; del Carmen Garrigós, M.; Jiménez, A. Active edible films: Current state and future trends. J. Appl. Polym. Sci 2016, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ortiz-Zarama, M.A.; Jiménez-Aparicio, A.R.; Solorza-Feria, J. Obtainment and partial characterization of biodegradable gelatin films with tannic acid, bentonite and glycerol. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 3424–3431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suderman, N.; Isa, M.I.N.; Sarbon, N.M. The effect of plasticizers on the functional properties of biodegradable gelatin-based film: A review. Food Biosci. 2018, 24, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Li, Z.; Yang, W.; Xue, C.; Wang, Y.; Dong, J.; Xue, Y. Modification of Gelatine with Galla chinensis Extract, a Natural Crosslinker. Int. J. Food Prop. 2016, 19, 731–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alemán, A.; González, F.; Arancibia, M.Y.; López-Caballero, M.E.; Montero, P.; Gómez-Guillén, M.C. Comparative study between film and coating packaging based on shrimp concentrate obtained from marine industrial waste for fish sausage preservation. Food Control 2016, 70, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Benbettaïeb, N.; Chambin, O.; Karbowiak, T.; Debeaufort, F. Release behavior of quercetin from chitosan-fish gelatin edible films influenced by electron beam irradiation. Food Control 2016, 66, 315–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fakhouri, F.M.; Martelli, S.M.; Caon, T.; Velasco, J.I.; Mei, L.H.I. Edible films and coatings based on starch/gelatin: Film properties and effect of coatings on quality of refrigerated Red Crimson grapes. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2015, 109, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, M.M.; Lee, J.; Bumanlag, L.P.; Latona, R.J.; Brown, E.M. Biopolymers produced from gelatin and whey protein concentrate using polyphenols. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc. 2014, 109, 82–88. [Google Scholar]
- Paul, S.K. Edible Films and Coatings for Fruits and Vegetables. In Encyclopedia of Renewable and Sustainable Materials, 1st ed.; Choudhury, I.A., Hashmi, S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; Volume 5, pp. 363–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dehghani, S.; Hosseini, S.V.; Regenstein, J.M. Edible films and coatings in seafood preservation: A review. Food Chem. 2018, 240, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kouhi, M.; Prabhakaran, M.P.; Ramakrishna, S. Edible polymers: An insight into its application in food, biomedicine and cosmetics. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 103, 248–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, J.H. Chapter 9—Edible Films and Coatings: A Review. In Innovations in Food Packaging, 2nd ed.; Han, J.H., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 213–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciannamea, E.M.; Stefani, P.M.; Ruseckaite, R.A. Physical and mechanical properties of compression molded and solution casting soybean protein concentrate based films. Food Hydrocoll. 2014, 38, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hammann, F.; Schmid, M. Determination and Quantification of Molecular Interactions in Protein Films: A Review. Materials 2014, 7, 7975–7996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Park, H.J.; Byun, Y.J.; Kim, Y.T.; Whiteside, W.S.; Bae, H.J. Chapter 10—Processes and Applications for Edible Coating and Film Materials from Agropolymers In Innovations in Food Packaging, 2nd ed.; Han, J.H., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 257–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Semenova, M.G.; Moiseenko, D.V.; Grigorovich, N.V.; Anokhina, M.S.; Antipova, A.S.; Belyakova, L.E.; Polikarpov, Y.N.; Tsapkina, E.N. Chapter 6—Protein–Polysaccharide Interactions and Digestion of the Complex Particles. In Food Structures, Digestion and Health, 1st ed.; Boland, M., Golding, M., Singh, H., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 169–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ochoa-Yepes, O.; Di Giogio, L.; Goyanes, S.; Mauri, A.; Famá, L. Influence of process (extrusion/thermo-compression, casting) and lentil protein content on physicochemical properties of starch films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 208, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yan, Q.; Hou, H.; Guo, P.; Dong, H. Effects of extrusion and glycerol content on properties of oxidized and acetylated corn starch-based films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 707–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, W.J.; Tsai, M.L.; Liu, T. Chitin nanofiber as a promising candidate for improved salty taste. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 75, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guilbert, S.; Cuq, B.; Gontard, N. Recent innovations in edible and/or biodegradable packaging materials. Food Addit. Contam. 1997, 14, 741–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiménez, A.; Fabra, M.J.; Talens, P.; Chiralt, A. Edible and Biodegradable Starch Films: A Review. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012, 5, 2058–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Umaraw, P.; Verma, A.K. Comprehensive review on application of edible film on meat and meat products: An eco-friendly approach. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 1270–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ju, J.; Xie, Y.; Guo, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Qian, H.; Yao, W. Application of edible coating with essential oil in food preservation. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 2467–2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrade, R.D.; Skurtys, O.; Osorio, F.A. Atomizing Spray Systems for Application of Edible Coatings. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2012, 11, 323–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anukiruthika, T.; Sethupathy, P.; Wilson, A.; Kashampur, K.; Moses, J.A.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Multilayer packaging: Advances in preparation techniques and emerging food applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 1156–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Jeya, J.J.; Chandrasekaran, M.; Venkatesan, S.P.; Sriram, V.; Britto Joseph, G.; Mageshwaran, G.; Durairaj, R.B. Scaling up difficulties and commercial aspects of edible films for food packaging: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 100, 210–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regubalan, B.; Pandit, P.; Maiti, S.; Nadathur, G.T.; Mallick, A. Potential bio-based edible films, foams, and hydrogels for food packaging. In Bio-Based Materials for Food Packaging, 1st ed.; Ahmed, S., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 105–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Shu, C.; Chen, Q.; Cao, J.; Jiang, W. The multi-layer film system improved the release and retention properties of cinnamon essential oil and its application as coating in inhibition to penicillium expansion of apple fruit. Food Chem. 2019, 299, 125109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnon-Rips, H.; Poverenov, E. Improving food products’ quality and storability by using Layer by Layer edible coatings. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 75, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Debeaufort, F.; Voilley, A. Effect of surfactants and drying rate on barrier properties of emulsified edible films. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 30, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Otoni, C.G.; Avena-Bustillos, R.J.; Azeredo, H.M.C.; Lorevice, M.V.; Moura, M.R.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; McHugh, T.H. Recent Advances on Edible Films Based on Fruits and Vegetables—A Review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 16, 1151–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Suhag, R.; Kumar, N.; Petkoska, A.T.; Upadhyay, A. Film formation and deposition methods of edible coating on food products: A review. Food Res. Int. 2020, 136, 109582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aguirre-Joya, J.A.; De Leon-Zapata, M.A.; Alvarez-Perez, O.B.; Torres-León, C.; Nieto-Oropeza, D.E.; Ventura-Sobrevilla, J.M.; Aguilar, M.A.; Ruelas-Chacón, X.; Rojas, R.; Ramos-Aguiñaga, M.E.; et al. Chapter 1—Basic and Applied Concepts of Edible Packaging for Foods. In Handbook of Food Bioengineering, Food Packaging and Preservation, 1st ed.; Grumezescu, A.M., Holban, A.M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; Volume 9, pp. 1–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, L.; Singh, C. Sesame protein based edible films: Development and characterization. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 61, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Moura, M.R.; Avena-Bustillos, R.J.; Mchugh, T.H.; Krochta, J.M.; Mattoso, L.H.C. Properties of Novel Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose Films Containing Chitosan Nanoparticles. J. Food Sci. 2008, 73, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Cui, F.; Zi, H.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, H.; Xiao, J. Development and characterization of a hydroxypropyl starch/zein bilayer edible film. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 141, 1175–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cao, L.; Liu, W.; Wang, L. Developing a green and edible film from Cassia gum: The effects of glycerol and sorbitol. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 175, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fishman, M.L.; Coffin, D.R.; Onwulata, C.I.; Konstance, R.P. Extrusion of pectin and glycerol with various combinations of orange albedo and starch. Carbohydr. Polym. 2004, 57, 401–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dangaran, K.; Tomasula, P.M.; Qi, P. Structure and Function of Protein-Based Edible Films and Coatings. In Edible Films and Coatings for Food Applications, 1st ed.; Huber, K., Embuscado, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 25–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, J.; Xiao, J.; Chen, X.; Liu, H. Essential oil loaded edible films prepared by continuous casting method: Effects of casting cycle and loading position on the release properties. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 26, 100555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, L.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, F. Effects of starches from different botanical sources and modification methods on physicochemical properties of starch-based edible films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 132, 897–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagheri, F.; Radi, M.; Amiri, S. Drying conditions highly influence the characteristics of glycerol-plasticized alginate films. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 90, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández-Pan, I.; Ziani, K.; Pedroza-Islas, R.; Maté, J.I. Effect of drying conditions on the mechanical and barrier properties of films based on Chitosan. Dry. Technol. 2010, 28, 1350–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, G.; Zhang, B.; Zhao, J.; Chen, H. Development and characterization of food packaging film fromcellulose sulfate. Food Hydrocoll. 2014, 35, 476–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, F.; Majeed, H.; Antoniou, J.; Li, Y.; Ma, Y.; Yokoyama, W.; Ma, J.; Zhong, F. Tailoring physical properties of transglutaminase-modified gelatin films by varying drying temperature. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 58, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernandez-Izquierdo, V.M.; Reid, D.S.; McHugh, T.H.; De, J. Berrios, J.; Krochta, J.M. Thermal Transitions and Extrusion of Glycerol-Plasticized Whey Protein Mixtures. J. Food Sci. 2008, 73, E169–E175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Woggum, T.; Sirivongpaisal, P.; Wittaya, T. Properties and characteristics of dual-modified rice starch based biodegradable films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 67, 490–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Skurtys, O.; Acevedo, C.; Pedreschi, F.; Enronoe, J.; Osorio, F.; Aguilera, J.M. Food Hydrocolloid Edible Films and Coatings; Nova Science Publishers Inc: New York, NY, USA, 2010; 66p. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, L.; Kerry, J.F.; Kerry, J.P. Selection of optimum extrusion technology parameters in the manufacture of edible/ biodegradable packaging films derived from food-based polymers. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2005, 3, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fitch-Vargas, P.R.; Aguilar-Palazuelos, E.; de Jesús Zazueta-Morales, J.; Vega-García, M.O.; Valdez-Morales, J.E.; Martínez-Bustos, F.; Jacobo-Valenzuela, N. Physicochemical and Microstructural Characterization of Corn Starch Edible Films Obtained by a Combination of Extrusion Technology and Casting Technique. J. Food Sci. 2016, 81, E2224–E2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zhang, S.; Gu, W.C.; Cheng, Z.Y.; Li, Y.; Gu, W.J. Development of edible packaging materials. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 904, 189–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pelissari, F.M.; Yamashita, F.; Grossmann, M.V.E. Extrusion parameters related to starch/chitosan active films properties. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 46, 702–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kostic, M.M.; Reifschneider, L.G. Design of Extrusion Dies. In Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing, 1st ed.; Lee, S., Ed.; Taylor & Francis Group: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2006; pp. 633–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernandez-Izquierdo, V.M.; Krochta, J.M. Thermoplastic processing of proteins for film formation—A review. J. Food Sci. 2008, 73, R30–R39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Seligra, P.; Guz, L.; Ochoa-Yepes, O.; Goyanes, S.; Famá, L. Influence of extrusion process conditions on starch film morphology. LWT 2017, 84, 520–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilfillan, W.N.; Moghaddam, L.; Bartley, J.; Doherty, W.O.S. Thermal extrusion of starch film with alcohol. J. Food Eng. 2015, 170, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Calderón-Castro, A.; Vega-García, M.O.; de Jesús Zazueta-Morales, J.; Fitch-Vargas, P.R.; Carrillo-López, A.; Gutiérrez-Dorado, R.; Limón-Valenzuela, V.; Aguilar-Palazuelos, E. Effect of extrusion process on the functional properties of high amylose corn starch edible films and its application in mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Tommy Atkins. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 905–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fishman, M.L.; Coffin, D.R.; Konstance, R.P.; Onwulata, C.I. Extrusion of pectin/starch blends plasticized with glycerol. Carbohydr. Polym. 2000, 41, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, L.; Kerry, J.F.; Kerry, J.P. Application and assessment of extruded edible casings manufactured from pectin and gelatin/sodium alginate blends for use with breakfast pork sausage. Meat Sci. 2007, 75, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chevalier, E.; Chaabani, A.; Assezat, G.; Prochazka, F.; Oulahal, N. Casein/wax blend extrusion for production of edible films as carriers of potassium sorbate—A comparative study of waxes and potassium sorbate effect. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2018, 16, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oechsle, A.M.; Häupler, M.; Weigel, F.; Gibis, M.; Kohlus, R.; Weiss, J. Modulation of extruded collagen films by the addition of co-gelling proteins. J. Food Eng. 2016, 171, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belyamani, I.; Prochazka, F.; Assezat, G. Production and characterization of sodium caseinate edible films made by blown-film extrusion. J. Food Eng. 2014, 121, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dang, K.M.; Yoksan, R. Development of thermoplastic starch blown film by incorporating plasticized chitosan. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 115, 575–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colak, B.Y.; Peynichou, P.; Galland, S.; Oulahal, N.; Assezat, G.; Prochazka, F.; Degraeve, P. Active biodegradable sodium caseinate films manufactured by blown-film extrusion: Effect of thermo-mechanical processing parameters and formulation on lysozyme stability. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 72, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez-Castellanos, W.; Martínez-Bustos, F.; Rodrigue, D.; Trujillo-Barragán, M. Extrusion blow molding of a starch-gelatin polymer matrix reinforced with cellulose. Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 73, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dierickx, L.; Saerens, L.; Almeida, A.; De Beer, T.; Remon, J.P.; Vervaet, C. Co-extrusion as manufacturing technique for fixed-dose combination mini-matrices. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2012, 81, 683–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hilbig, J.; Hartlieb, K.; Herrmann, K.; Weiss, J.; Gibis, M. Influence of calcium on white efflorescence formation on dry fermented sausages with co-extruded alginate casings. Food Res. Int. 2020, 131, 109012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harper, B.A.; Barbut, S.; Smith, A.; Marcone, M.F. Mechanical and Microstructural Properties of “Wet” Alginate and Composite Films Containing Various Carbohydrates. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, E84–E92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marcos, B.; Gou, P.; Arnau, J.; Guàrdia, M.D.; Comaposada, J. Co-extruded alginate as an alternative to collagen casings in the production of dry-fermented sausages: Impact of coating composition. Meat Sci. 2020, 169, 108184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbut, S.; Ioi, M.; Marcone, M. Co-extrusion of collagen casings. Effects of preparation, brining, and heating on strength, rheology and microstructure. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2020, 32, 91–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerrero, P.; Stefani, P.M.; Ruseckaite, R.A.; De La Caba, K. Functional properties of films based on soy protein isolate and gelatin processed by compression molding. J. Food Eng. 2011, 105, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tatara, R.A. 14 - Compression Molding. In Plastics Design Library, Applied Plastics Engineering Handbook, 2nd ed.; Kutz, M., Ed.; William Andrew Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 291–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishna, M.; Nindo, C.I.; Min, S.C. Development of fish gelatin edible films using extrusion and compression molding. J. Food Eng. 2012, 108, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ceballos, R.L.; Ochoa-Yepes, O.; Goyanes, S.; Bernal, C.; Famá, L. Effect of yerba mate extract on the performance of starch films obtained by extrusion and compression molding as active and smart packaging. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 244, 116495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uranga, J.; Etxabide, A.; Guerrero, P.; de la Caba, K. Development of active fish gelatin films with anthocyanins by compression molding. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 84, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortega-Toro, R.; Jiménez, A.; Talens, P.; Chiralt, A. Properties of starch-hydroxypropyl methylcellulose based films obtained by compression molding. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 109, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Shen, C.; Wang, L.; Li, Q. Optimization of injection molding process parameters using combination of artificial neural network and genetic algorithm method. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2007, 183, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nussinovitch, A. CHAPTER 10—Biopolymer Films and Composite Coatings. In Modern Biopolymer Science, 1st ed.; Kasapis, S., Norton, I.T., Ubbink, J.B., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; pp. 295–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perez, V.; Felix, M.; Romero, A.; Guerrero, A. Characterization of pea protein-based bioplastics processed by injection moulding. Food Bioprod. Process. 2016, 97, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, F.; Prashantha, K.; Soulestin, J.; Lacrampe, M.F.; Krawczak, P. Plasticized-starch/poly(ethylene oxide) blends prepared by extrusion. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 91, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cho, S.W.; Gällstedt, M.; Johansson, E.; Hedenqvist, M.S. Injection-molded nanocomposites and materials based on wheat gluten. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2011, 48, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Raghav, P.K.; Agarwal, N.; Saini, M. Edible coating of fruits and vegetables: A review. Int. J. Sci. Res. Mod. Educ. 2016, 1, 188–204. [Google Scholar]
- Pavlath, A.E.; Orts, W. Edible Films and Coatings: Why, What, and How? In Edible Films and Coatings for Food Applications, 1st ed.; Huber, K., Embuscado, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pelissari, F.M.; Ferreira, D.C.; Louzada, L.B.; Dos Santos, F.; Corrêa, A.C.; Moreira, F.K.V.; Mattoso, L.H. Chapter 10—Starch-Based Edible Films and Coatings: An Eco-friendly Alternative for Food Packaging. In Starches for Food Application, 1st ed.; Clerici, M.T.P.S., Schmiele, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 359–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, B.; Chatha, S.A.S.; Hussain, A.I.; Zia, K.M.; Akhtar, N. Recent advances on polysaccharides, lipids and protein based edible films and coatings: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 109, 1095–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Geschwindner, G.; Drouven, H. 18 - Manufacturing processes: Chocolate panning and inclusions. In Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition, Science and Technology of Enrobed and Filled Chocolate, Confectionery and Bakery Products, 1st ed.; Talbot, G., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2009; pp. 397–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solís-Morales, D.; Sáenz-Hernández, C.M.; Ortega-Rivas, E. Attrition reduction and quality improvement of coated puffed wheat by fluidised bed technology. J. Food Eng. 2009, 93, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wongphan, P.; Harnkarnsujarit, N. Characterization of starch, agar and maltodextrin blends for controlled dissolution of edible films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 156, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guerreiro, A.C.; Gago, C.M.L.; Faleiro, M.L.; Miguel, M.G.C.; Antunes, M.D.C. The effect of edible coatings on the nutritional quality of ‘Bravo de Esmolfe’ fresh-cut apple through shelf-life. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 75, 210–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tavassoli-Kafrani, E.; Shekarchizadeh, H.; Masoudpour-Behabadi, M. Development of edible films and coatings from alginates and carrageenans. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 137, 360–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ribeiro, A.M.; Estevinho, B.N.; Rocha, F. Preparation and Incorporation of Functional Ingredients in Edible Films and Coatings. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2021, 14, 209–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atieno, L.; Owino, W.; Ateka, E.M.; Ambuko, J. Influence of Coating Application Methods on the Postharvest Quality of Cassava. Int. J. Food Sci. 2019, 2019, 2148914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Parreidt, T.S.; Schmid, M.; Müller, K. Effect of Dipping and Vacuum Impregnation Coating Techniques with Alginate Based Coating on Physical Quality Parameters of Cantaloupe Melon. J. Food Sci. 2018, 83, 929–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiao, Z.; Luo, Y.; Luo, Y.; Wang, Q. Combined effects of sodium chlorite dip treatment and chitosan coatings on the quality of fresh-cut d’Anjou pears. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2011, 62, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamzeh, A.; Rezaei, M. The Effects of Sodium Alginate on Quality of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Fillets Stored at 4 ± 2 °C. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2012, 21, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mastromatteo, M.; Mastromatteo, M.; Conte, A.; Del Nobile, M.A. Combined effect of active coating and MAP to prolong the shelf life of minimally processed kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa cv. Hayward). Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 1224–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamzah, H.M.; Osman, A.; Tan, C.P.; Mohamad Ghazali, F. Carrageenan as an alternative coating for papaya (Carica papaya L. cv. Eksotika). Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2013, 75, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, N.; Neeraj. Polysaccharide-based component and their relevance in edible film/coating: A review. Nutr. Food Sci. 2019, 49, 793–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barringer, S.A.; Sumonsiri, N. Electrostatic Coating Technologies for Food Processing. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 6, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, Y.; Zhuang, C.; Gu, W.; Zhao, Y. Effect of molecular weight on the properties of chitosan films prepared using electrostatic spraying technique. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 212, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, Y.; Cavender, G.; Zhao, Y. Investigation of different coating application methods on the performance of edible coatings on Mozzarella cheese. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 56, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lara, G.; Yakoubi, S.; Villacorta, C.M.; Uemura, K.; Kobayashi, I.; Takahashi, C.; Nakajima, M.; Neves, M.A. Spray technology applications of xanthan gum-based edible coatings for fresh-cut lotus root (Nelumbo nucifera). Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peretto, G.; Du, W.X.; Avena-Bustillos, R.J.; Berrios, J.D.J.; Sambo, P.; McHugh, T.H. Electrostatic and Conventional Spraying of Alginate-Based Edible Coating with Natural Antimicrobials for Preserving Fresh Strawberry Quality. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2017, 10, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhuang, C.; Zhong, Y.; Zhao, Y. Effect of deacetylation degree on properties of Chitosan films using electrostatic spraying technique. Food Control 2019, 97, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khanzadi, M.; Jafari, S.M.; Mirzaei, H.; Chegini, F.K.; Maghsoudlou, Y.; Dehnad, D. Physical and mechanical properties in biodegradable films of whey protein concentrate-pullulan by application of beeswax. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 118, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira Saraiva, L.E.; Naponucena, L.d.O.M.; de Silva Santos, V.; Silva, R.P.D.; de Souza, C.O.; Souza, I.E.G.L.; de Oliveira Mamede, M.E.; Druzian, J.I. Development and application of edible film of active potato starch to extend mini panettone shelf life. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 73, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Da Rocha, M.; de Souza, M.M.; Prentice, C. Chapter 9—Biodegradable Films: An Alternative Food Packaging. In Handbook of Food Bioengineering, Food Packaging and Preservation, 1st ed.; Grumezescu, A.M., Holban, A.M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; Volume 9, pp. 307–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olivas, G.I.; Barbosa-Cánovas, G.V. Alginate-calcium films: Water vapor permeability and mechanical properties as affected by plasticizer and relative humidity. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 41, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikkonen, K.S.; Heikkinen, S.; Soovre, A.; Peura, M.; Serimaa, R.; Talja, R.A.; Helén, H.; Hyvönen, L.; Tenkanen, M. Films from oat spelt arabinoxylan plasticized with glycerol and sorbitol. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 114, 457–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ansorena, M.R.; Pereda, M.; Marcovich, N.E. Edible films. In Polymers for Food Applications, 1st ed.; Gutiérrez, T., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 5–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, M.A.; Bierhalz, A.C.K.; Kieckbusch, T.G. Alginate and pectin composite films crosslinked with Ca2+ ions: Effect of the plasticizer concentration. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 77, 736–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tillet, G.; Boutevin, B.; Ameduri, B. Chemical reactions of polymer crosslinking and post-crosslinking at room and medium temperature. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azeredo, H.M.C.; Waldron, K.W. Crosslinking in polysaccharide and protein films and coatings for food contact—A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 52, 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dole, P.; Joly, C.; Espuche, E.; Alric, I.; Gontard, N. Gas transport properties of starch based films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2004, 58, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Versino, F.; Lopez, O.V.; Garcia, M.A.; Zaritzky, N.E. Starch-based films and food coatings: An overview. Starch 2016, 68, 1026–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prakash Maran, J.; Sivakumar, V.; Thirugnanasambandham, K.; Kandasamy, S. Modeling and analysis of film composition on mechanical properties of maize starch based edible films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 62, 565–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Flores, S.; Famá, L.; Rojas, A.M.; Goyanes, S.; Gerschenson, L. Physical properties of tapioca-starch edible films: Influence of filmmaking and potassium sorbate. Food Res. Int. 2007, 40, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García, N.L.; Ribba, L.; Dufresne, A.; Aranguren, M.; Goyanes, S. Effect of glycerol on the morphology of nanocomposites made from thermoplastic starch and starch nanocrystals. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 84, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avila-De La Rosa, G.; Carrillo-Navas, H.; Echeverría, J.C.; Bello-Pérez, L.A.; Vernon-Carter, E.J.; Alvarez-Ramirez, J. Mechanisms of elastic turbulence in gelatinized starch dispersions. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2015, 77, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrillo-Navas, H.; Avila-De La Rosa, G.; Gómez-Luría, D.; Meraz, M.; Alvarez-Ramirez, J.; Vernon-Carter, E.J. Impact of ghosts on the viscoelastic response of gelatinized corn starch dispersions subjected to small strain deformations. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 110, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, J.; Xia, R.; Zheng, L.; Yuan, T.; Sun, R. Plasticized hemicelluloses/chitosan-based edible films reinforced by cellulose nanofiber with enhanced mechanical properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 224, 115164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lumdubwong, N. Applications of Starch-Based Films in Food Packaging. In Reference Module in Food Science; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olsson, E.; Hedenqvist, M.S.; Johansson, C.; Järnström, L. Influence of citric acid and curing on moisture sorption, diffusion and permeability of starch films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 94, 765–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Olsson, E.; Menzel, C.; Johansson, C.; Andersson, R.; Koch, K.; Järnström, L. The effect of pH on hydrolysis, cross-linking and barrier properties of starch barriers containing citric acid. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 98, 1505–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Menzel, C. Improvement of starch films for food packaging through a three-principle approach: Antioxidants, cross-linking and reinforcement. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 250, 116828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nawab, A.; Alam, F.; Haq, M.A.; Lutfi, Z.; Hasnain, A. Effect of mango kernel starch coatings on the shelf life of almond (Prunus dulcis) kernels. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2018, 42, e13449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehyar, G.F.; Han, J.H. Physical and Mechanical Properties of High-amylose Rice and Pea Starch Films as Affected by Relative Humidity and Plasticizer. J. Food Sci. 2006, 69, E449–E454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiumarelli, M.; Pereira, L.M.; Ferrari, C.C.; Sarantópoulos, C.I.G.L.; Hubinger, M.D. Cassava Starch Coating and Citric Acid to Preserve Quality Parameters of Fresh-Cut “Tommy Atkins” Mango. J. Food Sci. 2010, 75, E297–E304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Medronho, B.; Lindman, B. Brief overview on cellulose dissolution/regeneration interactions and mechanisms. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 222, 502–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Medronho, B.; Lindman, B. Competing forces during cellulose dissolution: From solvents to mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 19, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Lu, A.; Zhang, L. Recent advances in regenerated cellulose materials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2016, 53, 169–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cruz-Romero, M.C.; Cruz-Romero, M.; Kerry, J.P.; Kerry, J. Crop-based biodegradable packaging and its environmental implications. Nutr. Nat. Resour. 2008, 3, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindman, B.; Karlström, G.; Stigsson, L. On the mechanism of dissolution of cellulose. J. Mol. Liq. 2010, 156, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Medronho, B.; Romano, A.; Miguel, M.G.; Stigsson, L.; Lindman, B. Rationalizing cellulose (in)solubility: Reviewing basic physicochemical aspects and role of hydrophobic interactions. Cellulose 2012, 19, 581–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abe, M.; Fukaya, Y.; Ohno, H. Fast and facile dissolution of cellulose with tetrabutylphosphonium hydroxide containing 40 wt% water. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 1808–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Seoud, O.A.; Heinze, T. Organic esters of cellulose: New perspectives for old polymers. Adv. Polym. Sci. 2005, 186, 103–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Egal, M.; Budtova, T.; Navard, P. Structure of aqueous solutions of microcrystalline cellulose/sodium hydroxide below 0 °C and the limit of cellulose dissolution. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 2282–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lue, A.; Zhang, L. Advances in aqueous cellulose solvents. In Cellulose Solvents: For Analysis, Shaping and Chemical Modification, 1st ed.; Liebert, T., Heinze, T., Edgar, K.J., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2010; Volume 1033, pp. 67–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heinze, T.; Köhler, S. Dimethyl sulfoxide and ammonium fluorides-novel cellulose solvents. In Cellulose Solvents: For Analysis, Shaping and Chemical Modification, 1st ed.; Liebert, T., Heinze, T., Edgar, K.J., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2010; Volume 1033, pp. 103–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.J.; Shin, J.M.; Kang, T.H.; Kimura, S.; Wada, M.; Kim, U.J. Cellulose dissolution in aqueous lithium bromide solutions. Cellulose 2014, 21, 1175–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira, A.; Alves, V.; Coelhoso, I. Polysaccharide-Based Membranes in Food Packaging Applications. Membranes 2016, 6, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zhang, L.; Mao, Y.; Zhou, J.; Cai, J. Effects of Coagulation Conditions on the Properties of Regenerated Cellulose Films Prepared in NaOH/Urea Aqueous Solution. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 522–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geng, H.; Yuan, Z.; Fan, Q.; Dai, X.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Qin, M. Characterisation of cellulose films regenerated from acetone/water coagulants. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 102, 438–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, H.; Chang, C.; Zhang, L. Properties and applications of biodegradable transparent and photoluminescent cellulose films prepared via a green process. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bedane, A.H.; Eić, M.; Farmahini-Farahani, M.; Xiao, H. Water vapor transport properties of regenerated cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose films. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 493, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhall, R.K. Advances in Edible Coatings for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 53, 435–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Benito-González, I.; Jaén-Cano, C.M.; López-Rubio, A.; Martínez-Abad, A.; Martínez-Sanz, M. Valorisation of vine shoots for the development of cellulose-based biocomposite films with improved performance and bioactivity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 165, 1540–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwak, H.; Shin, S.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.; Lee, D.; Lee, H.; Lee, E.J.; Hyun, J. Protective coating of strawberries with cellulose nanofibers. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 258, 117688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oun, A.A.; Rhim, J.W. Isolation of cellulose nanocrystals from grain straws and their use for the preparation of carboxymethyl cellulose-based nanocomposite films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 150, 187–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, H.; Shi, H.; He, Y.; Fei, X.; Peng, L. Preparation and characterization of carboxymethyl cellulose-based composite films reinforced by cellulose nanocrystals derived from pea hull waste for food packaging applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 4104–4112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Singh, P.; Magalhães, S.; Alves, L.; Antunes, F.; Miguel, M.; Lindman, B.; Medronho, B. Cellulose-based edible films for probiotic entrapment. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 88, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osorio, F.A.; Molina, P.; Matiacevich, S.; Enrione, J.; Skurtys, O. Characteristics of hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC) based edible film developed for blueberry coatings. Procedia Food Sci. 2011, 1, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Azeredo, H.M.C.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Avena-Bustillos, R.J.; Filho, G.C.; Munford, M.L.; Wood, D.; McHugh, T.H. Nanocellulose reinforced chitosan composite films as affected by nanofiller loading and plasticizer content. J. Food Sci. 2010, 75, N1–N7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Savadekar, N.R.; Karande, V.S.; Vigneshwaran, N.; Bharimalla, A.K.; Mhaske, S.T. Preparation of nano cellulose fibers and its application in kappa-carrageenan based film. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2012, 51, 1008–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Benito-González, I.; López-Rubio, A.; Martínez-Sanz, M. High-performance starch biocomposites with celullose from waste biomass: Film properties and retrogradation behaviour. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 216, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, Z.; Xia, Y.; Yang, G.; Chen, J.; Ji, D. Improved film formability of oxidized starch-based blends through controlled modification with cellulose nanocrystals. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 140, 111665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almasi, H.; Ghanbarzadeh, B.; Entezami, A.A. Physicochemical properties of starch-CMC-nanoclay biodegradable films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2010, 46, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tongdeesoontorn, W.; Mauer, L.J.; Wongruong, S.; Sriburi, P.; Rachtanapun, P. Effect of carboxymethyl cellulose concentration on physical properties of biodegradable cassava starch-based films. Chem. Cent. J. 2011, 5, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Azeredo, H.M.C.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Wood, D.; Williams, T.G.; Avena-Bustillos, R.J.; McHugh, T.H. Nanocomposite edible films from mango puree reinforced with cellulose nanofibers. J. Food Sci. 2009, 74, N31–N35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Andrade-Pizarro, R.D.; Skurtys, O.; Osorio-Lira, F. Effect of cellulose nanofibers concentration on mechanical, optical, and barrier properties of gelatin-based edible films. DYNA 2015, 82, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azeredo, H.M.C.; Miranda, K.W.E.; Ribeiro, H.L.; Rosa, M.F.; Nascimento, D.M. Nanoreinforced alginate-acerola puree coatings on acerola fruits. J. Food Eng. 2012, 113, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wu, T.; Farnood, R.; O’Kelly, K.; Chen, B. Mechanical behavior of transparent nanofibrillar cellulose-chitosan nanocomposite films in dry and wet conditions. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2014, 32, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutierrez-Pacheco, M.M.; Ortega-Ramirez, L.A.; Cruz-Valenzuela, M.R.; Silva-Espinoza, B.A.; Gonzalez-Aguilar, G.A.; Ayala-Zavala, J.F. Chapter 50—Combinational Approaches for Antimicrobial Packaging: Pectin and Cinnamon Leaf Oil. In Antimicrobial Food Packaging, 1st ed.; Barros-Velázquez, J., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 609–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coenen, G.J.; Bakx, E.J.; Verhoef, R.P.; Schols, H.A.; Voragen, A.G.J. Identification of the connecting linkage between homo- or xylogalacturonan and rhamnogalacturonan type I. Carbohydr. Polym. 2007, 70, 224–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eça, K.S.; Machado, M.T.C.; Hubinger, M.D.; Menegalli, F.C. Development of Active Films From Pectin and Fruit Extracts: Light Protection, Antioxidant Capacity, and Compounds Stability. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, C2389–C2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munarin, F.; Tanzi, M.C.; Petrini, P. Advances in biomedical applications of pectin gels. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2012, 51, 681–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fraeye, I.; Duvetter, T.; Doungla, E.; Van Loey, A.; Hendrickx, M. Fine-tuning the properties of pectin-calcium gels by control of pectin fine structure, gel composition and environmental conditions. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 21, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Videcoq, P.; Garnier, C.; Robert, P.; Bonnin, E. Influence of calcium on pectin methylesterase behaviour in the presence of medium methylated pectins. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86, 1657–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thibault, J.-F.; Ralet, M.-C. Physico-Chemical Properties of Pectins in the Cell Walls and After Extraction. In Advances in Pectin and Pectinase Research, 1st ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 91–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuuva, T.; Lantto, R.; Reinikainen, T.; Buchert, J.; Autio, K. Rheological properties of laccase-induced sugar beet pectin gels. Food Hydrocoll. 2003, 17, 679–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galus, S.; Turska, A.; Lenart, A. Sorption and Wetting Properties of Pectin Edible Films. Czech J. Food Sci. 2012, 30, 446–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Giancone, T.; Torrieri, E.; Pierro, P. Di, Cavella, S.; Giosafatto, C.V.L.; Masi, P. Effect of Surface Density on the Engineering Properties of High Methoxyl Pectin-Based Edible Films. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2011, 4, 1228–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sucheta; Chaturvedi, K.; Sharma, N.; Yadav, S.K. Composite edible coatings from commercial pectin, corn flour and beetroot powder minimize post-harvest decay, reduces ripening and improves sensory liking of tomatoes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 133, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darni, Y.; Utami, H.; Septiana, R.; Fitriana, R.A. Comparative studies of the edible film based on low pectin methoxyl with glycerol and sorbitol plasticizers. J. Bahan Alam Terbarukan 2017, 6, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oms-Oliu, G.; Soliva-Fortuny, R.; Martín-Belloso, O. Edible coatings with antibrowning agents to maintain sensory quality and antioxidant properties of fresh-cut pears. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2008, 50, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrari, C.C.; Sarantópoulos, C.I.G.L.; Carmello-Guerreiro, S.M.; Hubinger, M.D. Effect of Osmotic Dehydration and Pectin Edible Coatings on Quality and Shelf Life of Fresh-Cut Melon. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moalemyan, M.; Ramaswamy, H.S.; Maftoonazad, N. Pectin-based edible coating for shelf-life extension of ataulfo mango. J. Food Process Eng. 2012, 35, 572–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sathivel, S.; Liu, Q.; Huang, J.; Prinyawiwatkul, W. The influence of chitosan glazing on the quality of skinless pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) fillets during frozen storage. J. Food Eng. 2007, 83, 366–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.T.; Thi Dao, U.T.; Thi Bui, Q.P.; Bach, G.L.; Ha Thuc, C.N.; Ha Thuc, H. Enhanced antimicrobial activities and physiochemical properties of edible film based on chitosan incorporated with Sonneratia caseolaris (L.) Engl. leaf extract. Prog. Org. Coat. 2020, 140, 105487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, S.; Dhillon, G.S. The versatile biopolymer chitosan: Potential sources, evaluation of extraction methods and applications. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 40, 155–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leceta, I.; Guerrero, P.; De La Caba, K. Functional properties of chitosan-based films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 93, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hwang, K.T.; Kim, J.T.; Jung, S.T.; Cho, G.S.; Park, H.J. Properties of chitosan-based biopolymer films with various degrees of deacetylation and molecular weights. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 89, 3476–3484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandez-Saiz, P.; Lagaron, J.M.; Ocio, M.J. Optimization of the biocide properties of chitosan for its application in the design of active films of interest in the food area. Food Hydrocoll. 2009, 23, 913–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, H.X.; He, Z.; Sun, Q.; He, Q.; Zeng, W.C. A functional polysaccharide film forming by pectin, chitosan, and tea polyphenols. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 215, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cerqueira, M.A.; Souza, B.W.S.; Teixeira, J.A.; Vicente, A.A. Effects of Interactions between the Constituents of Chitosan-Edible Films on Their Physical Properties. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012, 5, 3181–3192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Elsabee, M.Z.; Abdou, E.S. Chitosan based edible films and coatings: A review. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2013, 33, 1819–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nayik, G.A.; Majid, I.; Kumar, V. Characterization of Indian Honeys View project Sprouted onion View project Developments in Edible films and Coatings for the extension of Shelf Life of Fresh Fruits. Am. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2015, 2, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duran, A.; Kahve, H.I. The use of chitosan as a coating material. Acad. J. Sci. 2016, 05, 167–172. [Google Scholar]
- Van den Broek, L.A.M.; Knoop, R.J.I.; Kappen, F.H.J.; Boeriu, C.G. Chitosan films and blends for packaging material. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 116, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pavinatto, A.; de Almeida Mattos, A.V.; Malpass, A.C.G.; Okura, M.H.; Balogh, D.T.; Sanfelice, R.C. Coating with chitosan-based edible films for mechanical/biological protection of strawberries. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 151, 1004–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohan, C.O.; Ravishankar, C.N.; Lalitha, K.V.; Srinivasa Gopal, T.K. Effect of chitosan edible coating on the quality of double filleted Indian oil sardine (Sardinella longiceps) during chilled storage. Food Hydrocoll. 2012, 26, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, J.; Park, S.I.; Daeschel, M.A.; Zhao, Y. Antimicrobial chitosan-lysozyme (CL) films and coatings for enhancing microbial safety of mozzarella cheese. J. Food Sci. 2007, 72, M355–M362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Günlü, A.; Sipahioǧlu, S.; Alpas, H. The effect of chitosan-based edible film and high hydrostatic pressure process on the microbiological and chemical quality of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum) fillets during cold storage (4±1 °C). High Press. Res. 2014, 34, 110–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Günlü, A.; Koyun, E. Effects of Vacuum Packaging and Wrapping with Chitosan-Based Edible Film on the Extension of the Shelf Life of Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) Fillets in Cold Storage (4 °C). Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6, 1713–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vu, C.H.T.; Won, K. Novel water-resistant UV-activated oxygen indicator for intelligent food packaging. Food Chem. 2013, 140, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priyadarshi, R.; Kim, H.J.; Rhim, J.W. Effect of sulfur nanoparticles on properties of alginate-based films for active food packaging applications. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 110, 106155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Draget, K.I.; Taylor, C. Chemical, physical and biological properties of alginates and their biomedical implications. Food Hydrocoll. 2011, 25, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanco-Pascual, N.; Montero, M.P.; Gómez-Guillén, M.C. Antioxidant film development from unrefined extracts of brown seaweeds Laminaria digitata and Ascophyllum nodosum. Food Hydrocoll. 2014, 37, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xu, L.; Zhang, B.; Qin, Y.; Li, F.; Yang, S.; Lu, P.; Wang, L.; Fan, J. Preparation and characterization of antifungal coating films composed of sodium alginate and cyclolipopeptides produced by Bacillus subtilis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 143, 602–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Costa, M.J.; Marques, A.M.; Pastrana, L.M.; Teixeira, J.A.; Sillankorva, S.M.; Cerqueira, M.A. Physicochemical properties of alginate-based films: Effect of ionic crosslinking and mannuronic and guluronic acid ratio. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 81, 442–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Singh, P.; Baisthakur, P.; Yemul, O.S. Synthesis, characterization and application of crosslinked alginate as green packaging material. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mahcene, Z.; Khelil, A.; Hasni, S.; Akman, P.K.; Bozkurt, F.; Birech, K.; Goudjil, M.B.; Tornuk, F. Development and characterization of sodium alginate based active edible films incorporated with essential oils of some medicinal plants. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 145, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rangel-Marrón, M.; Mani-López, E.; Palou, E.; López-Malo, A. Effects of alginate-glycerol-citric acid concentrations on selected physical, mechanical, and barrier properties of papaya puree-based edible films and coatings, as evaluated by response surface methodology. LWT 2019, 101, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koushki, M.R.; Azizi, M.H.; Azizkhani, M.; Koohy-Kamaly, P. Effect of Different Formulations on Mechanical and Physical Properties of Calcium Alginate Edible Films. J. Food Qual. Hazards Control 2015, 2, 45–50. [Google Scholar]
- Elzoghby, A.O.; Abo El-Fotoh, W.S.; Elgindy, N.A. Casein-based formulations as promising controlled release drug delivery systems. J. Control. Release 2011, 153, 206–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeya, J.; Chandrasekaran, M.; Durairaj, R.; Mageshwaran, G.; Joseph, G.B. A Brief Review on Edible Food Packaging Materials. J. Glob. Eng. Probl. Solut. 2017, 1, 9–19. [Google Scholar]
- Khwaldia, K.; Ferez, C.; Banon, S.; Desobry, S.; Hardy, J. Milk proteins for edible films and coatings. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2004, 44, 239–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shendurse, A.; Gopikrishna, G.; Profile, S.; Pandya, A.J. Milk protein based edible films and coatings-preparation, properties and food applications. J. Nutr. Heal. Food Eng. 2018, 8, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tkaczewska, J. Peptides and protein hydrolysates as food preservatives and bioactive components of edible films and coatings—A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 106, 298–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, P.; Singh, T.P.; Gandhi, N. Prevention of lipid oxidation in muscle foods by milk proteins and peptides: A review. Food Rev. Int. 2018, 34, 226–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chambi, H.; Grosso, C. Edible films produced with gelatin and casein cross-linked with transglutaminase. Food Res. Int. 2006, 39, 458–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fabra, M.J.; Talens, P.; Chiralt, A. Influence of calcium on tensile, optical and water vapor permeability properties of sodium caseinate edible films. J. Food Eng. 2010, 96, 356–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mauer, L.J.; Smith, D.E.; Labuza, T.P. Water vapor permeability, mechanical, and structural properties of edible β-casein films. Int. Dairy J. 2000, 10, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schou, M.; Longares, A.; Montesinos-Herrero, C.; Monahan, F.J.; O’Riordan, D.; O’Sullivan, M. Properties of edible sodium caseinate films and their application as food wrapping. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 38, 605–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomasula, P.M.; Parris, N.; Yee, W.; Coffin, D. Properties of Films Made from CO2-Precipitated Casein. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 4470–4474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pankaj, S.K.; Bueno-Ferrer, C.; Misra, N.N.; O’Neill, L.; Tiwari, B.K.; Bourke, P.; Cullen, P.J. Physicochemical characterization of plasma-treated sodium caseinate film. Food Res. Int. 2014, 66, 438–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Teng, A.; Zhao, K.; Zhang, K.; Zhao, H.; Duan, S.; Li, S.; Guo, Y.; Wang, W. A top-down approach to improve collagen film’s performance: The comparisons of macro, micro and nano sized fibers. Food Chem. 2020, 309, 125624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamauchi, K.; Takeuchi, N.; Kurimoto, A.; Tanabe, T. Films of collagen crosslinked by S-S bonds: Preparation and characterization. Biomaterials 2001, 22, 855–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mauri, A.N.; Añón, M.C. Mechanical and Physical Properties of Soy Protein Films with pH-Modified Microstructures. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2008, 14, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matmaroh, K.; Benjakul, S.; Prodpran, T.; Encarnacion, A.B.; Kishimura, H. Characteristics of acid soluble collagen and pepsin soluble collagen from scale of spotted golden goatfish (Parupeneus heptacanthus). Food Chem. 2011, 129, 1179–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, D.; Liu, F.; Yu, Z.; Chang, B.; Goff, H.D.; Zhong, F. Effect of aging treatment on the physicochemical properties of collagen films. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 87, 436–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashim, P.; Mohd Ridzwan, M.S.; Bakar, J.; Mat Hashim, D. Collagen in food and beverage industries. Int. Food Res. J. 2015, 22, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Oechsle, A.M.; Wittmann, X.; Gibis, M.; Kohlus, R.; Weiss, J. Collagen entanglement influenced by the addition of acids. Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 58, 144–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseini, S.F.; Gómez-Guillén, M.C. A state-of-the-art review on the elaboration of fish gelatin as bioactive packaging: Special emphasis on nanotechnology-based approaches. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 79, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolf, K.L.; Sobral, P.J.A.; Telis, V.R.N. Physicochemical characterization of collagen fibers and collagen powder for self-composite film production. Food Hydrocoll. 2009, 23, 1886–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, S.; Wang, W.; Li, Y.; Gao, G.; Zhang, K.; Zhou, J.; Wu, Z. Cross-linking and film-forming properties of transglutaminase-modified collagen fibers tailored by denaturation temperature. Food Chem. 2019, 271, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gennadios, A.; Hanna, M.A.; Kurth, L.B. Application of edible coatings on meats, poultry and seafoods: A review. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 1997, 30, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ross-Murphy, S.B. Structure and rheology of gelatin gels: Recent progress. Polymer 1992, 33, 2622–2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Djabourov, M.; Lechaire, J.P.; Gaill, F. Structure and rheology of gelatin and collagen gels. Biorheology 1993, 30, 191–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Deiber, J.A.; Ottone, M.L.; Piaggio, M.V.; Peirotti, M.B. Characterization of cross-linked polyampholytic gelatin hydrogels through the rubber elasticity and thermodynamic swelling theories. Polymer 2009, 50, 6065–6075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gómez-Guillén, M.C.; Turnay, J.; Fernández-Díaz, M.D.; Ulmo, N.; Lizarbe, M.A.; Montero, P. Structural and physical properties of gelatin extracted from different marine species: A comparative study. Food Hydrocoll. 2002, 16, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Carvalho, R.A.; Sobral, P.J.A.; Thomazine, M.; Habitante, A.M.Q.B.; Giménez, B.; Gómez-Guillén, M.C.; Montero, P. Development of edible films based on differently processed Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) skin gelatin. Food Hydrocoll. 2008, 22, 1117–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mu, C.; Guo, J.; Li, X.; Lin, W.; Li, D. Preparation and properties of dialdehyde carboxymethyl cellulose crosslinked gelatin edible films. Food Hydrocoll. 2012, 27, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ustunol, Z. Edible Films and Coatings for Meat and Poultry. In Edible Films and Coatings for Food Applications, 1st ed.; Huber, K., Embuscado, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 245–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andreuccetti, C.; Carvalho, R.A.; Grosso, C.R.F. Effect of hydrophobic plasticizers on functional properties of gelatin-based films. Food Res. Int. 2009, 42, 1113–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed, S.A.A.; El-Sakhawy, M.; Nashy, E.S.H.A.; Othman, A.M. Novel natural composite films as packaging materials with enhanced properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 136, 774–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, D.; Min, S.C. Trout Skin Gelatin-Based Edible Film Development. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, E240–E246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sompie, M.; Tinangon, R.M.; Surtijono, S.E.; Said, M.I. Effect of long-time immersion in edible film solution from local chicken claw on the physical and chemical properties of chicken meat. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 492, 012056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.; Nam, J.; Yun, H.; Jin, H.J.; Kwak, H.W. Aquatic polymer-based edible films of fish gelatin crosslinked with alginate dialdehyde having enhanced physicochemical properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 254, 117317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sobral, P.J.A.; Menegalli, F.C.; Hubinger, M.D.; Roques, M.A. Mechanical, water vapor barrier and thermal properties of gelatin based edible films. Food Hydrocoll. 2001, 15, 423–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertan, L.C.; Tanada-Palmu, P.S.; Siani, A.C.; Grosso, C.R.F. Effect of fatty acids and “Brazilian elemi” on composite films based on gelatin. Food Hydrocoll. 2005, 19, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribba, L.; Garcia, N.L.; D’Accorso, N.; Goyanes, S. Chapter 3Disadvantages of Starch-Based Materials, Feasible Alternatives in Order to Overcome These Limitations. In Starch-Based Materials in Food Packaging, 1st ed.; Villar, M.A., Barbosa, S.E., García, M.A., Castillo, L.A., López, O.V., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2017; pp. 37–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molavi, H.; Behfar, S.; Shariati, M.A.; Kaviani, M.; Atarod, S. A review on biodegradable starch based film. J. Microbiol. Biotech. Food Sci. 2015, 4, 456–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sánchez-González, L.; Arab-Tehrany, E.; Cháfer, M.; González-Martínez, C.; Chiralt, A. Active Edible and Biodegradable Starch Films. In Polysaccharides, 1st ed.; Ramawat, K.G., Mérillon, J.-M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, U.; Naqash, F.; Gani, A.; Masoodi, F.A. Art and Science behind Modified Starch Edible Films and Coatings: A Review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2016, 15, 568–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perez Sira, E.; Dufour, D. Native and Modified Starches as Matrix for Edible Films and Covers. Nutr. Food Sci. Int. J. 2017, 3, 555615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farahnaky, A.; Saberi, B.; Majzoobi, M. Effect of glycerol on physical and mechanical properties of wheat starch edible films. J. Texture Stud. 2013, 44, 176–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ugalde, M.L.; de Cezaro, A.M.; Vedovatto, F.; Paroul, N.; Steffens, J.; Valduga, E.; Backes, G.T.; Franceschi, E.; Cansian, R.L. Active starch biopolymeric packaging film for sausages embedded with essential oil of Syzygium aromaticum. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 54, 2171–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sapper, M.; Chiralt, A. Starch-Based Coatings for Preservation of Fruits and Vegetables. Coatings 2018, 8, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khumkomgool, A.; Saneluksana, T.; Harnkarnsujarit, N. Active meat packaging from thermoplastic cassava starch containing sappan and cinnamon herbal extracts via LLDPE blown-film extrusion. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 26, 100557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacharya, D.; Kandeepan, G. Selection of biopolymers to develop a biodegradable and edible film for packaging of luncheon chicken meat slices. Asian J. Dairy Food Res. 2017, 36, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huber, K.; Embuscado, M. Edible Films and Coatings for Food Applications, 1st ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; 411p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalia, S.; Dufresne, A.; Cherian, B.M.; Kaith, B.S.; Averous, L.; Njuguna, J.; Nassiopoulos, E. Cellulose-Based Bio- and Nanocomposites: A Review. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2011, 2011, 837875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shit, S.C.; Shah, P.M. Edible Polymers: Challenges and Opportunities. J. Polym. 2014, 2014, 427259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fotie, G.; Limbo, S.; Piergiovanni, L. Manufacturing of Food Packaging Based on Nanocellulose: Current Advances and Challenges. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tajeddin, B. Chapter 21. Cellulose-Based Polymers for Packaging Applications. In Lignocellulosic Polymer Composites, 1st ed.; Thakur, V.K., Ed.; Scrivener Publishing LLC: Beverly, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 477–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, F.A.G.S.; Dourado, F.; Gama, M.; Poças, F. Nanocellulose Bio-Based Composites for Food Packaging. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghosh, T.; Katiyar, V. Cellulose-Based Hydrogel Films for Food Packaging. In Cellulose-Based Superabsorbent Hydrogels. Polymers and Polymeric Composites: A Reference Series, 1st ed.; Mondal, M., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 1061–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Sun, H.; Yang, B.; Weng, Y. Hemicellulose-Based Film: Potential Green Films for Food Packaging. Polymers 2020, 12, 1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirviö, J.A.; Visanko, M.; Ukkola, J.; Liimatainen, H. Effect of plasticizers on the mechanical and thermomechanical properties of cellulose-based biocomposite films. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 122, 513–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vieira, M.G.A.; da Silva, M.A.; dos Santos, L.O.; Beppu, M.M. Natural-based plasticizers and biopolymer films: A review. Eur. Polym. J. 2011, 47, 254–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khan, A.; Niazi, M.B.K.; Naqvi, S.R.; Farooq, W. Influence of Plasticizers on Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Methyl Cellulose-Based Edible Films. J. Polym. Environ. 2018, 26, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Indrarti, L.; Indriyati; Syampurwadi, A.; Pujiastuti, S. Physical and Mechanical Properties of Modified Bacterial Cellulose Composite Films. AIP Conf. Proc. 2016, 1711, 050007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mellinas, C.; Ramos, M.; Jiménez, A.; Garrigós, M.C. Recent Trends in the Use of Pectin from Agro-Waste Residues as a Natural-Based Biopolymer for Food Packaging Applications. Materials 2020, 13, 673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Dutta, J. Chitosan based nanocomposite films and coatings: Emerging antimicrobial food packaging alternatives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 97, 196–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bourbon, A.I.; Pinheiro, A.C.; Cerqueira, M.A.; Rocha, C.M.R.; Avides, M.C.; Quintas, M.A.C.; Vicente, A.A. Physico-chemical characterization of chitosan-based edible films incorporating bioactive compounds of different molecular weight. J. Food Eng. 2011, 106, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Souza, V.G.L.; Pires, J.R.A.; Rodrigues, C.; Coelhoso, I.M.; Fernando, A.L. Chitosan Composites in Packaging Industry—Current Trends and Future Challenges. Polymers 2020, 12, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Haghighi, H.; Licciardello, F.; Fava, P.; Siesler, H.W.; Pulvirenti, A. Recent advances on chitosan-based films for sustainable food packaging applications. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 26, 100551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morin-Crini, N.; Lichtfouse, E.; Torri, G.; Crini, G. Fundamentals and Applications of Chitosan. In Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 35. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews., 1st ed.; Crini, G., Lichtfouse, E., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 35, pp. 49–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cissé, M.; Montet, D.; Loiseau, G.; Ducamp-Collin, M.-N. Influence of the Concentrations of Chitosan and Glycerol on Edible Film Properties Showed by Response Surface Methodology. J. Polym. Environ. 2012, 20, 830–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, T.P.; Chatli, M.K.; Sahoo, J. Development of chitosan based edible films: Process optimization using response surface methodology. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 2530–2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Qian, J.; Ding, F. Emerging Chitosan-Based Films for Food Packaging Applications. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 395–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, N.A.S.; Mohamad, Z.; Khan, Z.I.; Jusoh, M.; Zakaria, Z.Y.; Ngadi, N. Alginate Based Sustainable Films and Composites for Packaging: A Review. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2021, 83, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marismandani, A.D.P.; Husni, A. Development and Characterization of Biobased Alginate/Glycerol/Virgin Coconut Oil as Biodegradable Packaging. E3S Web Conf. 2020, 147, 03016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nehchiri, N.; Amiri, S.; Radi, M. Improving the water barrier properties of alginate packaging films by submicron coating with drying linseed oil. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2021, 34, 283–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gheorghita, R.; Gutt, G.; Amariei, S. The Use of Edible Films Based on Sodium Alginate in Meat Product Packaging: An Eco-Friendly Alternative to Conventional Plastic Materials. Coatings 2020, 10, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nataraj, D.; Reddy, N. Chemical modifications of alginate and its derivatives. Int. J. Chem. Res. 2020, 4, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.-S.; Xie, Y.-J.; He, W. Research progress on chemical modification of alginate: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 84, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.Y.; Mooney, D.J. Alginate: Properties and biomedical applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 106–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bourtoom, T. Edible protein films: Properties enhancement. Int. Food Res. J. 2009, 16, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Wagh, Y.R.; Pushpadass, H.A.; Emerald, F.M.; Nath, B.S. Preparation and characterization of milk protein films and their application for packaging of Cheddar cheese. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 3767–3775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khwaldia, K.; Banon, S.; Perez, C.; Desobry, S. Properties of Sodium Caseinate Film-Forming Dispersions and Films. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87, 2011–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdalrazeq, M.; Giosafatto, C.V.L.; Esposito, M.; Fenderico, M.; Di Pierro, P.; Porta, R. Glycerol-Plasticized Films Obtained from Whey Proteins Denatured at Alkaline pH. Coatings 2019, 9, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Arrieta, M.P.; Peltzer, M.A.; del Carmen Garrigós, M.; Jiménez, A. Structure and mechanical properties of sodium and calcium caseinate edible active films with carvacrol. J. Food Eng. 2013, 114, 486–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Maruddin, F.; Malaka, R.; Baba, S.; Amqam, H.; Taufik, M.; Sabil, S. Brightness, elongation and thickness of edible film with caseinate sodium using a type of plasticizer. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 492, 012043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saez-Orviz, S.; Laca, A.; Rendueles, M.; Díaz, M. Approaches for casein film uses in food stuff packaging. Afinidad –Barcelona 2017, 74, 26–29. [Google Scholar]
- Coltelli, M.B.; Wild, F.; Bugnicourt, E.; Cinelli, P.; Lindner, M.; Schmid, M.; Weckel, V.; Müller, K.; Rodriguez, P.; Staebler, A.; et al. State of the art in the development and properties of protein-based films and coatings and their applicability to cellulose based products: An extensive review. Coatings 2016, 6, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Said, M.I.; Erwanto, Y.; Abustam, E. Properties of Edible Film Produced using Combination of Collagen Extracts of Bligon Goatskin with Glycerol. Am. J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2016, 11, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alizadeh, A.; Behfar, S. Properties of collagen based edible films in food packaging: A review. Ann. Biol. Res. 2013, 4, 253–256. [Google Scholar]
- Mihalca, V.; Kerezsi, A.D.; Weber, A.; Gruber-Traub, C.; Schmucker, J.; Vodnar, D.C.; Dulf, F.V.; Socaci, S.A.; Fărcaș, A.; Mureșan, C.I.; et al. Protein-Based Films and Coatings for Food Industry Applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, C.; Liu, F.; Yu, Z.; Ma, Y.; Goff, H.D.; Zhong, F. Improvement in physicochemical properties of collagen casings by glutaraldehyde cross-linking and drying temperature regulating. Food Chem. 2020, 318, 126404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ikeuchi, Y. 24 - Recent advances in the application of high pressure technology to processed meat products. In Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition, Processed Meats, 1st ed.; Kerry, J.P., Kerry, J.F., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2011; pp. 590–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, W.; Han, Y.; Liu, A. Improved mechanical and thermal properties of gelatin films using a nano inorganic filler. J. Food Process Eng. 2017, 40, e12469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wihodo, M.; Moraru, C.I. Physical and chemical methods used to enhance the structure and mechanical properties of protein films: A review. J. Food Eng. 2013, 114, 292–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Etxabide, A.; Uranga, J.; Guerrero, P.; de la Caba, K. Improvement of barrier properties of fish gelatin films promoted by gelatin glycation with lactose at high temperatures. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 63, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomazine, M.; Carvalho, R.A.; Sobral, P.J.A. Physical Properties of Gelatin Films Plasticized by Blends of Glycerol and Sorbitol. J. Food Sci. 2005, 70, E172–E176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arpi, N.; Fahrizal; Martunis; Hardianti, E. Preparation and characterization of biodegradable film based on skin and bone fish gelatin. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 207, 012050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Hassan, A.A.; Norziah, M.H. Starch-gelatin edible films: Water vapor permeability and mechanical properties as affected by plasticizers. Food Hydrocoll. 2012, 26, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thi, M.T.L.; Hiroki, M.; Emiko, O.; Kazufumi, O. Effect of preparing conditions on properties of gelatin film from horse mackerel scale. KnE Life Sci. 2015, 32–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jorge, M.F.C.; Alexandre, E.M.C.; Flaker, C.H.C.; Bittante, A.M.Q.B.; Sobral, P.J.d.A. Biodegradable Films Based on Gelatin and Montmorillonite Produced by Spreading. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2015, 2015, 806791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Azmi, N.S.; Basha, R.K.; Arifin, N.N.T.; Othman, S.H.; Mohammed, M.A.P. Functional Properties of Tilapia’s Fish Scale Gelatin Film: Effects of Different Type of Plasticizers. Sains Malays. 2020, 49, 2221–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonilla, J.; Atarés, L.; Vargas, M.; Chiralt, A. Edible films and coatings to prevent the detrimental effect of oxygen on food quality: Possibilities and limitations. J. Food Eng. 2012, 110, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhu, L.; Fang, Z.; Shi, Q. Physicochemical, mechanical and structural properties of composite edible films based on whey protein isolate/psyllium seed gum. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 153, 892–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pérez-Vergara, L.D.; Cifuentes, M.T.; Franco, A.P.; Pérez-Cervera, C.E.; Andrade-Pizarro, R.D. Development and characterization of edible films based on native cassava starch, beeswax, and propolis. NFS J. 2020, 21, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suwanprateep, S.; Kumsapaya, C.; Sayan, P. Structure and Thermal Properties of Rice Starch-based Film Blended with Mesocarp Cellulose Fiber. Mater. Today 2019, 17, 2039–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dias, A.B.; Müller, C.M.O.; Larotonda, F.D.S.; Laurindo, J.B. Mechanical and barrier properties of composite films based on rice flour and cellulose fibers. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, X.; Chang, P.R.; Yu, J. Properties of biodegradable thermoplastic pea starch/carboxymethyl cellulose and pea starch/microcrystalline cellulose composites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 72, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tosati, J.V.; Messias, V.C.; Carvalho, P.I.N.; Rodrigues Pollonio, M.A.; Meireles, M.A.A.; Monteiro, A.R. Antimicrobial Effect of Edible Coating Blend Based on Turmeric Starch Residue and Gelatin Applied onto Fresh Frankfurter Sausage. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2017, 10, 2165–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirviö, J.A.; Kolehmainen, A.; Liimatainen, H.; Niinimäki, J.; Hormi, O.E.O. Biocomposite cellulose-alginate films: Promising packaging materials. Food Chem. 2014, 151, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pei, Y.; Yang, J.; Liu, P.; Xu, M.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, L. Fabrication, properties and bioapplications of cellulose/collagen hydrolysate composite films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 92, 1752–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, Y.; Luo, X.; Li, W.; Song, R.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Li, B.; Liu, S. Green and biodegradable composite films with novel antimicrobial performance based on cellulose. Food Chem. 2016, 197, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brito, T.B.; Carrajola, J.F.; Gonçalves, E.C.B.A.; Martelli-Tosi, M.; Ferreira, M.S.L. Fruit and vegetable residues flours with different granulometry range as raw material for pectin-enriched biodegradable film preparation. Food Res. Int. 2019, 121, 412–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nešić, A.; Onjia, A.; Davidović, S.; Dimitrijević, S.; Errico, M.E.; Santagata, G.; Malinconico, M. Design of pectin-sodium alginate based films for potential healthcare application: Study of chemico-physical interactions between the components of films and assessment of their antimicrobial activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 157, 981–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giosafatto, C.V.L.; Di Pierro, P.; Gunning, P.; Mackie, A.; Porta, R.; Mariniello, L. Characterization of Citrus pectin edible films containing transglutaminase-modified phaseolin. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 106, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, M.; Nirmal, N.P.; Danish, M.; Chuprom, J.; Jafarzedeh, S. Characterisation of composite films fabricated from collagen/chitosan and collagen/soy protein isolate for food packaging applications. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 82191–82204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, D.; Wang, H.; Wang, L. Physical properties and antibacterial activity of quaternized chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose blend films. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 65, 398–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galus, S.; Lenart, A. Development and characterization of composite edible films based on sodium alginate and pectin. J. Food Eng. 2013, 115, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nkenmogne Kamdem, I.E.; Saidou, C.; Ngassoum, M.B.; Ndjouenkeu, R. Synergistic interactions in dilute aqueous solutions between alginate and tropical vegetal hydrocolloids. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Oliveira Filho, J.G.; Rodrigues, J.M.; Valadares, A.C.F.; de Almeida, A.B.; de Lima, T.M.; Takeuchi, K.P.; Alves, C.C.F.; de Figueiredo Sousa, H.A.; da Silva, E.R.; Dyszy, F.H.; et al. Active food packaging: Alginate films with cottonseed protein hydrolysates. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 92, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomaa, M.; Hifney, A.F.; Fawzy, M.A.; Abdel-Gawad, K.M. Use of seaweed and filamentous fungus derived polysaccharides in the development of alginate-chitosan edible films containing fucoidan: Study of moisture sorption, polyphenol release and antioxidant properties. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 82, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chick, J.; Hernandez, R.J. Physical, Thermal, and Barrier Characterization of Casein-Wax-Based Edible Films. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67, 1073–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, R.; Chai, Y. Preparation and characterization of homogeneous and enhanced casein protein-based composite films via incorporating cellulose microgel. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Eghbal, N.; Degraeve, P.; Oulahal, N.; Yarmand, M.S.; Mousavi, M.E.; Gharsallaoui, A. Low methoxyl pectin/sodium caseinate interactions and composite film formation at neutral pH. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 69, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ben Slimane, E.; Sadok, S. Collagen from Cartilaginous Fish By-Products for a Potential Application in Bioactive Film Composite. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ding, C.; Zhang, M.; Li, G. Preparation and characterization of collagen/hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) blend film. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 119, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lima, Á.M.; Cerqueira, M.A.; Souza, B.W.S.; Santos, E.C.M.; Teixeira, J.A.; Moreira, R.A.; Vicente, A.A. New edible coatings composed of galactomannans and collagen blends to improve the postharvest quality of fruits—Influence on fruits gas transfer rate. J. Food Eng. 2010, 97, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bonilla, J.; Sobral, P.J.A. Gelatin-chitosan edible film activated with Boldo extract for improving microbiological and antioxidant stability of sliced Prato cheese. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 1617–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jridi, M.; Hajji, S.; Ben Ayed, H.; Lassoued, I.; Mbarek, A.; Kammoun, M.; Souissi, N.; Nasri, M. Physical, structural, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of gelatin-chitosan composite edible films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 67, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, N.; Fu, Y.; He, J. Preparation and physical properties of soy protein isolate and gelatin composite films. Food Hydrocoll. 2007, 21, 1153–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Auty, M.A.E.; Kerry, J.P. Physical assessment of composite biodegradable films manufactured using whey protein isolate, gelatin and sodium alginate. J. Food Eng. 2010, 96, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabari, M. Investigation of Carboxymethyl Cellulose (CMC) on Mechanical Properties of Cold Water Fish Gelatin Biodegradable Edible Films. Foods 2017, 6, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kurek, M.; Galus, S.; Debeaufort, F. Surface, mechanical and barrier properties of bio-based composite films based on chitosan and whey protein. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2014, 1, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nair, M.S.; Tomar, M.; Punia, S.; Kukula-Koch, W.; Kumar, M. Enhancing the functionality of chitosan- and alginate-based active edible coatings/films for the preservation of fruits and vegetables: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 304–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valdés, A.; Mellinas, A.C.; Ramos, M.; Garrigós, M.C.; Jiménez, A. Natural additives and agricultural wastes in biopolymer formulations for food packaging. Front. Chem. 2014, 2, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nor, S.M.; Ding, P. Trends and advances in edible biopolymer coating for tropical fruit: A review. Food Res. Int. 2020, 134, 109208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Song, Y.; Zheng, Q. Ecomaterials based on food proteins and polysaccharides. Polym. Rev. 2014, 54, 514–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dainelli, D.; Gontard, N.; Spyropoulos, D.; Zondervan-van den Beuken, E.; Tobback, P. Active and intelligent food packaging: Legal aspects and safety concerns. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 19, S103–S112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salgado, P.R.; Ortiz, C.M.; Musso, Y.S.; Di Giorgio, L.; Mauri, A.N. Edible films and coatings containing bioactives. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2015, 5, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cuq, B.; Gontard, N.; Guilbert, S. Edible films and coatings as active layers. In Active Food Packaging, 1st ed.; Rooney, M.L., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1995; pp. 111–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suput, D.; Lazic, V.; Popovic, S.; Hromis, N. Edible films and coatings: Sources, properties and application. Food Feed Res. 2015, 42, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ASTM D882-10 Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Thin Plastic Sheeting. 2010. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1520/D0882-10 (accessed on 24 December 2020).
- Acevedo-Fani, A.; Salvia-Trujillo, L.; Rojas-Graü, M.A.; Martín-Belloso, O. Edible films from essential-oil-loaded nanoemulsions: Physicochemical characterization and antimicrobial properties. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 47, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Han, J.H.; Aristippos, G. 15 - Edible films and coatings: A review. In Innovations in Food Packaging, 1st ed.; Han, J.H., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2005; pp. 239–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lacroix, M. Mechanical and Permeability Properties of Edible Films and Coatings for Food and Pharmaceutical Applications. In Edible Films and Coatings for Food Applications, 1st ed.; Huber, K., Embuscado, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 347–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avramescu, S.M.; Butean, C.; Popa, C.V.; Ortan, A.; Moraru, I.; Temocico, G. Edible and Functionalized Films/Coatings—Performances and Perspectives. Coatings 2020, 10, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 527-1:2019(en), Plastics—Determination of Tensile Properties—Part 1: General Principles. 2019. Available online: https://www.iso.org/ru/standard/75824.html (accessed on 24 December 2020).
- McHugh, T.H.; Krochta, J.M. Sorbitol-vs Glycerol-Plasticized Whey Protein Edible Films: Integrated Oxygen Permeability and Tensile Property Evaluation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1994, 42, 841–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nandane, A.S.; Jain, R. Study of mechanical properties of soy protein based edible film as affected by its composition and process parameters by using RSM. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 3645–3650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pena-Serna, C.; Lopes Filho, J.F. Biodegradable zein-based blend films: Structural, mechanical and barrier properties. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2015, 53, 348–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seung, Y.C.; Rhee, C. Mechanical properties and water vapor permeability of edible films made from fractionated soy proteins with ultrafiltration. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2004, 37, 833–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arham, R.; Mulyati, M.T.; Metusalach, M.; Salengke, S. Physical and mechanical properties of agar based edible film with glycerol plasticizer. Int. Food Res. J. 2016, 23, 1669–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, W.S.; Han, J.H. Physical and mechanical properties of pea-protein-based edible films. J. Food Sci. 2001, 66, 319–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razmjoo, F.; Sadeghi, E.; Rouhi, M.; Mohammadi, R.; Noroozi, R.; Safajoo, S. Polyvinyl alcohol—Zedo gum edible film: Physical, mechanical and thermal properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021, 138, 49875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Talja, R.A.; Helén, H.; Roos, Y.H.; Jouppila, K. Effect of type and content of binary polyol mixtures on physical and mechanical properties of starch-based edible films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 71, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chillo, S.; Flores, S.; Mastromatteo, M.; Conte, A.; Gerschenson, L.; Del Nobile, M.A. Influence of glycerol and chitosan on tapioca starch-based edible film properties. J. Food Eng. 2008, 88, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ASTM D6241 - 14 Standard Test Method for Static Puncture Strength of Geotextiles and Geotextile-Related Products Using a 50-mm Probe. 2014. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1520/D6241-14 (accessed on 25 March 2021).
- Nur Hazirah, M.A.S.P.; Isa, M.I.N.; Sarbon, N.M. Effect of xanthan gum on the physical and mechanical properties of gelatin-carboxymethyl cellulose film blends. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2016, 9, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, B.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G.; Liang, M.; Chen, X.; Long, G. A Fractal Model for Kozeny-Carman Constant and Dimensionless Permeability of Fibrous Porous Media with Roughened Surfaces. Fractals 2019, 27, 1950116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, M.; Liu, Y.; Xiao, B.; Yang, S.; Wang, Z.; Han, H. An analytical model for the transverse permeability of gas diffusion layer with electrical double layer effects in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 17880–17888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ASTM E96 - 00 Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials. 2000. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1520/E0096-00 (accessed on 25 December 2020).
- ASTM D3985 - 17 Standard Test Method for Oxygen Gas Transmission Rate Through Plastic Film and Sheeting Using a Coulometric Sensor. 2017. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1520/D3985-17 (accessed on 25 December 2020).
- Sanchez-Tamayo, M.I.; Pasos, C.V.; Ochoa-Martinez, C.I. Methods for gas permeability measurement in edible films for fruits and vegetables: A review. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.T. Quality and safety aspects of meat products as affected by various physical manipulations of packaging materials. Meat Sci. 2010, 86, 138–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Butler, B.L.; Vergano, P.J.; Testin, R.F.; Bunn, J.M.; Wiles, J.L. Mechanical and barrier properties of edible chitosan films as affected by composition and storage. J. Food Sci. 1996, 61, 953–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wongphan, P.; Harnkarnsujarit, N. Edible packaging from hydroxypropyl thermoplastic cassava starch, agar and maltodextrin blends produced by cast extrusion. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 56, 62–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadeghi-Varkani, A.; Emam-Djomeh, Z.; Askari, G. Physicochemical and microstructural properties of a novel edible film synthesized from Balangu seed mucilage. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 108, 1110–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nur Hanani, Z.A.; Roos, Y.H.; Kerry, J.P. Use of beef, pork and fish gelatin sources in the manufacture of films and assessment of their composition and mechanical properties. Food Hydrocoll. 2012, 29, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.Z.; Liu, L.; Holmes, J.; Kerry, J.F.; Kerry, J.P. Assessment of film-forming potential and properties of protein and polysaccharide-based biopolymer films. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 42, 1128–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gontard, N.; Guilbert, S. Bio-packaging: Technology and properties of edible and/or biodegradable material of agricultural origin. In Food Packaging and Preservation, 1st ed.; Mathlouthi, M., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1994; pp. 159–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gontard, N.; Guilbert, S.; Cuq, J.-L. Edible Wheat Gluten Films: Influence of the Main Process Variables on Film Properties using Response Surface Methodology. J. Food Sci. 1992, 57, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Da Rosa Zavareze, E.; Storck, C.R.; de Castro, L.A.S.; Schirmer, M.A.; Dias, A.R.G. Effect of heat-moisture treatment on rice starch of varying amylose content. Food Chem. 2010, 121, 358–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwok, D.Y.; Neumann, A.W. Contact angle measurement and contact angle interpretation. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1999, 81, 167–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walczak, M.; Michalska-Sionkowska, M.; Kaczmarek, B.; Sionkowska, A. Surface and antibacterial properties of thin films based on collagen and thymol. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 22, 100949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutiérrez, T.J. Surface and nutraceutical properties of edible films made from starchy sources with and without added blackberry pulp. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 165, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kwok, D.Y.; Neumann, A.W. Contact angle interpretation in terms of solid surface tension. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2000, 161, 31–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseini, S.F.; Rezaei, M.; Zandi, M.; Farahmandghavi, F. Bio-based composite edible films containing Origanum vulgare L. essential oil. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 67, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Moura, M.R.; Aouada, F.A.; Avena-Bustillos, R.J.; McHugh, T.H.; Krochta, J.M.; Mattoso, L.H.C. Improved barrier and mechanical properties of novel hydroxypropyl methylcellulose edible films with chitosan/tripolyphosphate nanoparticles. J. Food Eng. 2009, 92, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Advantages | Disadvantages | Approaches for Properties Improving | Recommended Film-forming Solution | Appropriate form and Ways of Production | Type of Packaged Food | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Starch | ||||||
Strong and flexible structure Transparency Resistance to fats and oils Good strain at break Tasteless Odorless Very low oxygen permeability | Hydrophilicity Low water stability High moisture sensitivity High water vapor permeability Retrogradation phenomena Brittle behavior at room temperature Poor mechanical properties and processability | Plasticizers addition Compatibilizers addition Structure modification (TPS) Chemical modification (acetylation, hydroxypropylation, acid modified, etc.) Crosslinking (glutaraldehyde, sodium trimetaphosphate, citric acid, etc.) Physical modification (deep freezing and thawing, B-type X-ray diffraction, extrusion heating and fluidized bed heating, ultrasound waves, microwave radiation, osmotic pressure, pulsed electric field, etc.) Gelatinization transition temperatures Enzymatic hydrolysis or modification Elevation of amylose content Micro- and nanosized fillers (starch nanocrystals or nanoparticles) Composite materials and blending | Starch 2–4 wt %, 15–30% of glycerol or sorbitol (mainly glycerol) | Films Wet method (casting) Dry methods (extrusion, injection moulding, and compression moulding) Coatings Dipping and spraying | Fruit, vegetables, berries, meat and some meat products | [175,269,396,397,398,399,400,401,402,403,404,405,406] |
Cellulose | ||||||
High strength High stiffness Excellent tensile strength and modulus High durability Low bulk Good moldability Resistant to oils and fats Transparent Flavorless Colorless Tasteless High barrier to gases | Infusibility and insolubility Lack of good interfacial adhesion Low melting point Poor resistance towards moisture Poor water vapor barriers Brittleness Sensitive towards pH, temperature, ionic, electro responses | Surface chemical modifications (silylation, mercerization, peroxide, benzoylation, etc.) Cellulose derivates processing (cellulose xanthate, MC, HPMC, HPC, and CMC) Crosslinking (citric acid) Hydrophobization (oxidation, esterification, amidation, carbamination, grafting) Plasticizers and fats/oils/wax addition (glycerol, polyethylene glycol400, palmitic acid, xylitol, sorbitol, etc.) Composite materials and blending | Mainly used as reinforcing agent Composition of film-forming solution strongly depends on type of cellulose derivates, as well as composition of cellulose-containing matherial | Films Wet method (casting) Dry methods (extrusion) Coatings Dipping and spraying | Fruits, berries and vegetables, meat and poultry products with limitations, appropriate for frying oil, breading or batter during frying | [406,407,408,409,410,411,412,413,414,415,416,417] |
Pectins | ||||||
Good oxygen, aroma, and lipid barriers Transparent Flavorless Colorless Tasteless | Hydrophilicity Subjected to re-dissolution in water or destruction in high humidity conditions Brittle and stiff structure Poor moisture barriers Not strong Poor mechanical characteristics | Plasticizers addition (glycerol, acetylated monoglycerides, poly-ethylene glycol, and sucrose) Crosslinking (ionomers formation, calcium ions) Composite materials and blending | 1–3 wt % pectin, 45–50% of glycerol, 1–2% of calcium chloride | Coatings (mainly) Dipping, brushing and spraying Films Wet method (casting) | Fruits, berries and vegetables, meat and poultry products with limitations | [72,78,325,328,406,418] |
Chitosan | ||||||
Low oxygen and CO2 permeability Antimicrobial properties Antioxidant activity Forms strong films Excellent film-forming behavior Compatibility with other substances Good mechanical properties Transparent Flavorless Colorless Tasteless Acts as a chelating agent | High water sensitivity Highly permeable to water vapor Low mechanical and thermal stability Brittleness Stiffness | Addition of neutral lipids, fatty acids waxes and clay Addition of cross-linking agents Chemical modifications (N-methylation, alkylation) Irradiation Ultrasonic treatments Grafting Enzyme treatment Plasticizers addition (glycerol, xylitol, and sorbitol) Thermomechanical treatment Complexation Surface coating Natural deep eutectic solvents s based on choline chloride prepared with malic acid (MA), lactic acid (LA), citric acid, and glycerol Composite materials and blending | 1–2% of chitosan (>90% DDA) in 1% acetic acid/malic/lactic/citric acid (mainly acetic acid), 20–30% of glycerol | Films Wet method (casting) Dry methods (extrusion, compression moulding) Coatings Dipping and spraying | Fruits, berries and vegetables, Meat, fish and poultry | [26,46,335,340,406,419,420,421,422,423,424,425,426] |
Alginate | ||||||
Structural stability Prevent lipid oxidation and stop rancidity Polarity and water-solubility Good heat stability Decent strong film Transparent Flavorless Colorless Tasteless Uniform Good oxygen barriers Good oil barrier properties Good biocompatibility Osteoconductivity | Hydrophilicity Subjected to re-dissolution in water or destruction in high humidity conditions Rigidity Poor acid stability Highly sensitive to calcium ions Tend to form lumps Brittleness Film is easily damaged when dried Weak mechanical strength | Crosslinking (ionic, covalent, photo, enzymatic ) Chemical modification (propylene glycol alginate (PGA), oxidation, sulfation, copolymerization, esterification, amidation, etc) Plasticizers addition (glycerol, sodium lactate, sorbitol, polyethylene glycol (PEG), etc.) Addition of surface active agents (0–5% tween 40, tween 80, span 80, span 60, and soy lecithin) Addition of oils Composite materials and blending | 2.5–4% of alginate, 1–1.5% of calcium chloride, 10–50% of glycerol | Films Wet method (casting, more often used) Dry methods (extrusion) Coatings Dipping and spraying | Fruits, berries and vegetables Bakery coatings-icings Meat and poultry, precooked meat products | [26,97,244,354,406,427,428,429,430,431,432,433] |
Casein | ||||||
Low oxygen and carbon dioxide permeability Mechanical resistance Good strength Adhere well to hydrophilic surfaces High thermal stability Good film forming ability Transparent Desirable flavor Flexible | Brittleness High sensitivity to moisture Hazy films Significant protein particle size Poor barriers to moisture Potential allergenicity Not enough mechanical properties and elasticity | Cross-linking (formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, lactic acid, genipin, tannic acid, wax) Denaturation Enzyme treatment (transglutaminase) Plasticizers addition (water, glycerol, propylene glycol, and sorbitol) Maillard reaction Changing the ionic strength of the film-forming solution (precipitation with salts, CO2CN) pH alteration Physical treatment (photo-induced polymerization, pulsed light, irradiation) Chemical treatment (alkali-treatment) Composite materials and blending | 1–10 wt % of casein, 30–50% of glycerol or sorbitol | Films Wet method (casting, more often used) Dry methods (extrusion rarely) Coatings Dipping and spraying (more often than dipping) | Fruits, berries, vegetables, and chees, fish, meat and meat product | [113,115,208,362,406,434,435,436,437,438,439,440,441] |
Collagen | ||||||
Mechanical resistance Good barriers to oxygen and carbon dioxide Adhere well to hydrophilic surfaces Gel strength Good melting temperature Shape and stability Good mechanical properties | High sensitivity to moisture Poor barriers to moisture Not so strong Prone to rupture Seepage phenomenon Anisotropy Dependence of properties on alignment direction of collagen fiber Poor quality, particularly in terms of strength and elasticity | Cross-linking (gluteraldehyde, carbodimide, transglutarninase, keratin, metal ions) Plasticizers addition (glycerol or sorbitol) UV irradiation High pressure treatment Organic acid treatment Enzymatic treatments (proteases such as papain, bromolain, ficin, fungal protease, trypsin, chymotrypsin, or pepsin) Aging treatment Regeneration Composite materials and blending | 3–8 wt % (0–10%) of collagen | Casings or films Extrusion (wet and dry spinning technology) and co-extrusion | Meat and meat product (especially casings for sausages) | [224,406,442,443,444,445,446] |
Gelatin | ||||||
Good film-forming properties Biocompatibility Transparent Low oxygen permeability Absence of an appreciable odour Transparent Tasteless Gel strength | Low strength Inelasticity Brittleness Limited thermal stability Limited mechanical properties High sensitivity to moisture Poor barriers to moisture | Cross-linking (genipin, transglutaminase, natural extracts, glutaraldehyde) Plasticizers addition (propylene glycol, ethylene glycol, glycerol or sorbitol, Sucrose, oleic acid, citric acid, tartaric acid, malic acid, PEG of different molecular weights, mannitol, EG, DEG, TEG, EA, di ethanol amine (DEA) and TEA) Inorganic and organic materials addition Physical treatment (heating or irradiation) Maillard reaction Chemical modification (acetylation, deamidation, glycation, etc.) Composite materials and blending | 2–5 wt % of gelatin, 10–30% of glycerol | Films Wet method (casting) Dry methods (extrusion, blown-extrusion) Coatings Dipping and spraying (dipping is more spread) | Various meat products, poultry, fish, vegetables and fruits | [113,139,406,447,448,449,450,451,452,453,454,455] |
Biopolymers | Plasticizer | Crosslinking Agent | Changes in Properties | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Starch | ||||
Cassava and rice starch/maltodextrin/agar | Glycerin | - | High film forming ability for package molding, improved the mechanical and water barrier properties, decreased relaxation temperatures, improved water sensitivity. | [242] |
Potato starch/cellulose fibers from sunflower husk | Glycerin | Citric acid | Improved resistance towards stress and sufficient extensibility and high tensile strength, brittleness due to starch-cellulose interactions and decreased starch chain mobility, reinforced network and decreased in swelling. | [279] |
Tapioca starch/beeswax/propolis | Glycerin | - | Lower values of water vapor permeability and water solubility; decreased in the moisture content and vapor water permeability. | [458] |
Rice starch/cellulose fiber mesocarp | - | - | Enhanced thermal stability and lowered water uptake | [459] |
Rice starch/cellulose | Glycerin/sorbitol | - | Reinforced mechanically the films (higher tensile strength) and reduced water vapor permeabilities | [460] |
Pea starch/CMC and pea starch/MC | Glycerin | - | Improved the storage modulus and the glass transition temperature, increased the tensile stress, elongation at break and the barrier of water vapor; MC increased the thermalstability, while CMC decreased the thermal stability. | [461] |
Turmeric starch/gelatin | Glycerin | Gelatin increased flexibility and elongation at break | [462] | |
Cellulose and derivatives | ||||
Wood cellulose/sodium alginate | - | Calcium chloride | Increased the mechanical properties (tensile), improved grease barrier properties and reduced water vapor permeability | [463] |
Cellulose/collagen hydrolysate | - | - | Exhibited good transparence and the capacity for ultraviolet radiation absorption, improved the mechanical properties and enhanced the stability in distilled water. | [464] |
Cellulose/chitosan | - | - | High transparent property, excellent barrier properties against oxygen and antimicrobial properties. | [465] |
Pectin | ||||
Fruit and vegetable wastes (fruit and vegetable flour) | - | - | Decreased solubility (50%) and improved of the mechanical properties (decrease of elongation and increase of tensile strength) | [466] |
Citrus pectin/sodium alginate | Polyglycerin | Zinc chloride | Improved the strength of crosslinking network, improved mechanical performance. | [467] |
Papaya puree/alginate | Glycerin | Calcium chloride/citric acid | Improved puncture strength | [357] |
Pectin/protein phaseolin | - | Microbial transglutaminase | Mechanical properties and barrier properties to CO2, O2 and water vapor was comparable to commercial plastics. | [468] |
Chitosan | ||||
Chitosan/collagen | Glycerin | - | Displayed higher elongation at break point, but lower tensile strength and modulus of elasticity, increased water vapor permeability, decreased transparency | [469] |
Quaternized chitosan/CMC | - | - | Improved tensile properties, thermostability, oxygen permeability values, and water resistance | [470] |
Alginate | ||||
Alginate/pectin | Glycerin | Calcium chloride | Continuous, homogenous and transparent films, chemical composition influenced on color, water vapor permeability, tensile strength, elongation at break | [471] |
Alginate/gum | - | Calcium chloride | Improved the strength of network | [472] |
Alginate/cotton hydrolysate | Glycerin | - | Increased the barrier properties to visible light, did not affect the moisture content, biodegradability, solubility or oil barrier properties, increased the thickness and water vapor permeability | [473] |
Alginate/chitosan | Glycerin | Calcium chloride | Decreased water solubility, but increased film thickness, water vapor permeability and oxygen permeability, good barrier properties against ultraviolet light. | [474] |
Casein | ||||
Lactic acid casein powder/carnauba or candelilla waxes | Sorbitol | - | Decreased water permeability | [475] |
Casein/cellulose microgel | - | - | Reduced the moisture absorption and the water vapor permeability, homogeneous and dense cross-sectional structure, increased the cleavage temperature, tensile strength and Young’s modulus | [476] |
Sodium caseinate/low-methoxylated pectin | - | - | Increased the stiffness of films (Young’s modulus) and decreased flexibility, decreased water content | [477] |
Collagen | ||||
Fish skin collagen/chitosan | - | - | Lowered water solubility and lightness | [478] |
Cattle skin collagen/HPMC | PEG 1500 | - | Elevated thermal decomposition temperature and denaturation temperature, exhibited a more homogeneous and compact structure, improved tensile strength, ultimate elongation, hydrophilicity, stretch-ability and smoothness | [479] |
Collagen/galactomannan | Glycerin | - | Convenient values of wettability | [480] |
Gelatin | ||||
Gelatin/chitosan | Glycerin | - | No significant difference in tensile strength, thickness and transparency | [481,482] |
Soy protein isolate/bovine bone gelatin | Glycerin | - | Increased tensile strength, elongation to break, elastic modulus and swelling property, more transparent, and easier to handle | [483] |
Whey protein isolate/gelatin/sodium alginate | Glycerin | - | Improved barrier to oxygen, water vapor and mechanical properties | [484] |
Fish gelatin/CMC | Glycerin/sorbitol | - | Increased tensile strength and Young’s modulus, decreased the elongation percent and equilibrium moisture | [485] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lisitsyn, A.; Semenova, A.; Nasonova, V.; Polishchuk, E.; Revutskaya, N.; Kozyrev, I.; Kotenkova, E. Approaches in Animal Proteins and Natural Polysaccharides Application for Food Packaging: Edible Film Production and Quality Estimation. Polymers 2021, 13, 1592. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13101592
Lisitsyn A, Semenova A, Nasonova V, Polishchuk E, Revutskaya N, Kozyrev I, Kotenkova E. Approaches in Animal Proteins and Natural Polysaccharides Application for Food Packaging: Edible Film Production and Quality Estimation. Polymers. 2021; 13(10):1592. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13101592
Chicago/Turabian StyleLisitsyn, Andrey, Anastasia Semenova, Viktoria Nasonova, Ekaterina Polishchuk, Natalia Revutskaya, Ivan Kozyrev, and Elena Kotenkova. 2021. "Approaches in Animal Proteins and Natural Polysaccharides Application for Food Packaging: Edible Film Production and Quality Estimation" Polymers 13, no. 10: 1592. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13101592
APA StyleLisitsyn, A., Semenova, A., Nasonova, V., Polishchuk, E., Revutskaya, N., Kozyrev, I., & Kotenkova, E. (2021). Approaches in Animal Proteins and Natural Polysaccharides Application for Food Packaging: Edible Film Production and Quality Estimation. Polymers, 13(10), 1592. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13101592