Next Article in Journal
The Construction of a Hydrophilic Inorganic Layer Enables Mechanochemically Robust Super Antifouling UHMWPE Composite Membrane Surfaces
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Fructose and Ascorbic Acid on the Performance of Cross-Linked Fish Gelatin Films
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/polym12030568
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fluorescent SiO2@Tb3+(PET-TEG)3Phen Hybrids as Nucleating Additive for Enhancement of Crystallinity of PET

by
Yanna Zhang
1,
Yao Wang
1,*,
Hao Li
1,
Xuezhong Gong
1,
Jixian Liu
1,
Linjun Huang
1,
Wei Wang
1,
Yanxin Wang
1,
Zhihuan Zhao
1,
Laurence A. Belfiore
1,2 and
Jianguo Tang
1,*
1
Institute of Hybrid Materials, National Center of International Research for Hybrid Materials Technology, National Base of International Science & Technology Cooperation, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
2
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2020, 12(3), 568; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12030568
Submission received: 17 December 2019 / Revised: 13 February 2020 / Accepted: 24 February 2020 / Published: 4 March 2020
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A hybrid polymer of SiO2@Tb3+(poly(ethylene terephthalate)-tetraglycol)3 phenanthroline (SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen) was synthesized by mixing of inorganic SiO2 nanoparticles with polymeric segments of PET–TEG, whereas PET–TEG was achieved through multi-step functionalization strategy. Tb3+ ions and β-diketonate ligand Phen were added in resulting material. The experimental results demonstrated that it was well blended with PET as a robust additive, and not only promoted the crystallinity, but also possessed excellent luminescence properties. An investigation of the mechanism revealed that the SiO2 nanoparticles functioned as a crystallization promotor; the Tb3+ acted as the fluorescent centre; and the PET–TEG segments played the role of linker and buffer, providing better compatibility of PET matrix with the inorganic component. This work demonstrated that hybrid polymers are appealing as multifunctional additives in the polymer processing and polymer luminescence field.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) is an important industrial material that is widely used for packaging film, fiber, and beverage bottles owing to its excellent thermophysical properties, chemical resistance, and low permeability [1]. However, its slow crystallization rate and poor crystallization [2] affect the properties and further limit its application [3] in industrial production. It is commonly accepted that addition of nucleating additives is one of the most effective protocols to improve the crystallization rate and achieve good crystallinity, which lead to the enhancement of various properties [4,5,6].
Silica nanoparticles (SiO2 NPs) with a large surface area have been demonstrated to be nanofillers in the PET matrix, enhancing the mechanical and physical properties owing to the strong interaction between SiO2 and the PET chain [7]. Meanwhile, the incompatibility is the big problem in achieving homogeneously dispersed SiO2 NPs in the PET matrix. Additionally, specific properties are difficult to integrate into PET, as the bare SiO2 lacks functional groups to anchor specific moieties. Notably, hybrid polymer is a special type of nucleating agent [8] that has the below properties of inorganic (stability and rigidity), organics (processability and flexibility), and possessing superior compatibility with the polymer matrix. Furthermore, it provides additional functions (e.g., luminescence, chemical sensing) [9] for the polymer composites [10].
To obtain PET–SiO2 hybrids, in situ polymerization by grafting polymer chain [11] onto silica NP is more acceptable because it guarantees the homogeneity of hybridization and avoids the aggregation of silica nanoparticles [12]. In order to control the graft density, the “grafting from” method is usually adopted in the way of introducing initiating groups on the silica surface via in situ polymerization and followed by further polymerization techniques [13]. These protocols also allow luminesce properties for the PET–SiO2 hybrids with potential applications in optical fibers, and rare earth elements are excellent candidates in which to be doped. Many researches have reported Eu, Tb, and so on doped polymers obtaining good fluorescent properties [14]. Few reports have focused on the Tb-doped PET–SiO2 hybrids. They have great potential to fabricate highly spinnable fluorescent PET optical fiber, and their applications have been extended to the fields of coatings [15,16], membranes [17], OLED [18], and so on.
In this work, the rare-earth doped hybrid polymer of SiO2@Tb3+(PET–tetraglycol (TEG))3Phen was synthesized through the multi-step polymerization process [19]. Successful coating of PET–TEG polymeric blocks and complexation of Tb3+ were clearly identified by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [20], X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and fluorescent spectrometer. The SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen hybrids were used as nucleating reagents for PET crystallization. The differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) analysis showed that SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen have a positive effect on enhancing the degree of crystallinity. The fluorescent experiments showed that the SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen hybrids exhibited good luminescence properties, which give it great potential to fabricate fluorescent PET optical fiber [21].

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Materials

The commercial PET polyester slices (processing grade: fiber grade, non-extinction, intrinsic viscosity 0.676 dL/g) were purchased from Sinopec Yizheng Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd. (Yizheng, China). The SiO2 nanoparticles (amorphous hydrophilicity, particle size is about 100~200 nm) were purchased from Zhejiang Yuda Chemical Co., Ltd. Sulfoxide chloride, benzene, tetrachloroethane, phenol, antimony trioxide, toluene, dimethyl terephthalate (DMT), zinc acetate, acetone, triphenyl phosphite, o-phenanthroline (Phen), and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Tetraethylene glycol (TEG) was obtained from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All the above mentioned reagents are of analytical grade (AR), and were used as received without further purification. Terbium chloride (99.99%) was purchased from Shandong Desheng New Materials Co., Ltd. (Jining, China).

2.2. The Preparation of Tb3+/PET–TEG/Phen

Firstly, the low molecular weight PET (Mn = 11,500) was synthesized via condensation polymerization, according to our previous report [22]. Then, phenol and tetrachloroethane (mass ratio 1:1) was mixed with the above PET in a round bottom flask. The mixture was kept in an oil bath of 70 °C for 2 h with continuously stirring. Then, 5 mL ethylene glycol was added dropwise, followed by 30 mg Sb2O3 and 16 mL TEG. Afterwards, the temperature was raised to 110 °C, and kept for 2.5 h to form PET–TEG. To obtain Tb3+/PET–TEG/Phen, an amount of TbCl3 (0.02 mol/L) and Phen (0.02 mol/L) were mixed with PET–TEG, and reacted at 70 °C for 6 h.
Polymers 12 00568 i001

2.3. The Preparation of SiO2–TEG

Firstly, SiO2 was treated with sulfoxide chloride as follows: 1.5 g of SiO2 nanoparticles was dispersed in benzene to form a homogeneous suspension, after which 12.5 mL sulfoxide chloride was added and the mixture was kept at 65 °C for 5 h. The suspension was centrifuged and the precipitate was washed twice with benzene. Then, the solid was dried in an oven (100 °C). Next, 0.5 g of the pre-treated SiO2 NPs was dispersed in 20 mL toluene, and mixed with 10 mL tetraethylene glycol for reaction at 70 °C for 5 h with continuously stirring under an N2 atmosphere. Finally, the product was washed twice with toluene and dried in an oven.
Polymers 12 00568 i002

2.4. The Preparation of SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen

Briefly, 1.4 g of Tb3+/PET–TEG/Phen was put into a mixed solution of phenol and tetrachloroethane (mass ratio 1:1) in a round bottom flask, which was placed in an oil bath (70 °C), and 5 mL of ethylene glycol was added. After 1 h, the reaction temperature was raised to 100 °C, following by the addition of 30 mg of Sb2O3 and 0.4 g SiO2–TEG, and the reaction was kept for another 2 h. Afterwards, the solid product was separated and washed twice with acetone and ethanol, respectively. The chemical reaction principle is the same as (1).

2.5. The Preparation of PET/SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen

The prepared SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen was used as additives to obtain an SiO2/Tb-hybridized PET composite. In detail, a different amount of SiO2@Tb3+(PET-TEG)3Phen was blended with commercial PET slices using a micro-blender via the melt blending method. For the different amount of additives, the PET hybrids are named as 0%, 1%, 2%, and 3%.

2.6. Characterization

The molecular weight of PET–TEG was characterized by gel permeation chromatography (GPC, HLC-8320GPC, Kyoto, Japan). The column temperature was set at 25 °C, and the column pressure was 31 MPa. The mobile phase was DMF, and the elution time was 1 h. The elements of the prepared additive and PET hybrids were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, D8 Advance, Bruker, Cologne, Germany). The excitation source was Mg Kα X-ray, the power was 300 W, and the C1s spectrum (284.8 eV) was used as calibration. The functional groups were analysed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, MAGNA-IR 5700, Nicolet, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). The morphology and composition were characterized by transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEM-F200, Kyoto, Japan) and SEM-EDS (Energy Dispersive Spectrometer) (GENESIS XM, Waltham, MA, USA). The fluorescence properties were measured by fluorescence spectrometer (Spectro Xepos, Cologne, Germany) and microspectro phometer (20/30PV, Craic, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). The excitation wavelength was set as 331 nm. The crystallization performance of PET hybrids was characterized by differential scanning calorimeter (DSC, DSC214 Polyma, Cologne, Germany). The temperature range was set from 25 to 280 °C. The ramp rate was 10 °C/min.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Molecular Weight Determination of PET–TEG

As illustrated in Scheme 1, the PET–TEG is a key matrix to integrate SiO2 and Tb for the subsequent hybridization with PET slices. It is crucial to determine the molecular weight of PET–TEG in order to hybridize SiO2 and Tb with precisely controlled content. As measured by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) [23], the molecular weight distribution curve of PET–TEG shows a single peak, indicating the distribution is narrow. The Mw fraction below 95% located between 17,000 and 70,000 (Figure S1). It can be seen from Table 1 that the LMPET (low molecular weight) sample presented a degree of polydispersity of around 2.5, and the PET–TEG sample presented a degree of polydispersity of around 1.2. In addition, the molecular weights (Mw and Mn) [24] show a slight variation from the PET sample to PET–TEG; according to statistics, even small differences in molecular weight values can cause considerable differences in PET properties.

3.2. Structure Characterization

The synthesis of SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen required multiple steps, starting from SiO2 and PET, and in each step, the obtained samples were characterized by FTIR. (Figure 1) The bands at 794 cm−1 and 1058 cm−1 are the characteristic stretching vibration absorption peaks of Si–O–Si [25,26], which can be found in both SiO2 and SiO2–TEG. In SiO2–TEG, the C–H (1122 cm−1) and C–O (1248 cm−1) overlapped with that of Si–O–C and Si–O–Si, which cannot be clearly distinguished. In PET–TEG, the symmetrical vibration absorption peak (721 cm−1) [27] can be assigned to the C–O–C group of the PET skeleton. The characteristic absorption peak at 1713 cm−1 is ascribed to the C=O of polyester [28]. Compared with PET-TEG, the band at 1650 cm−1 of Tb3+ (PET–TEG)3Phen shows a new absorption peak of the conjugated carbonyl; it can be assigned to the incorporation of the Tb-complex [29], in which Tb coordinated with nitrogen and oxygen atoms, as shown in Scheme 1. In SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen, the presence of the bands at 1058 cm−1 and 1650 cm−1 confirmed the existence of SiO2 and Tb3+, respectively, indicating the synthetic protocol was well conducted and the final samples were successfully prepared.
To obtain bond information of the samples, XPS was used to analyse the C-bond and the results are shown in Figure 2. In the deconvolution spectrum of C1s in SiO2–TEG, the peaks at 284.4 and 286.1 eV can be assigned to C–C and C–O–C, respectively [29], verifying the grafting of TEG moieties onto SiO2. Further, the increased C content (12.74%), compared with SiO2, can also prove this (Table 2). In the sample of SiO2@Tb3+ (PET–TEG)3Phen, the C=C peak was deconvoluted at 284.5 eV, which can be from the benzene ring of Phen [30]. The peak that appeared at 288.6 eV can be assigned to the O=C=O, indicating the presence of PET. Element content analysis (Table 2) also proved the presence of Tb (0.79%, atomic ratio) and N (comes from Phen). These results demonstrated the successful synthesis of SiO2@Tb3+ (PET–TEG)3Phen.

3.3. Characterization of Fluorescence Properties

The fluorescence properties of the synthesized Tb3+/PET–TEG/Phen and SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen were measured by fluorescence spectrometer, and the results are shown in Figure 3. The excitation wavelength was determined at 331 nm (Figure 3b). In Figure 3a, the fluorescence intensity of SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen is much weaker compared with Tb3+/PET–TEG/Phen. It is believed that the Tb3+/PET–TEG/Phen was grafted onto the SiO2 surface through crosslink. Thus, the SiO2 play the role of collectors, which accumulated surrounding Tb3+ and increased the local concentration of PET–TEG segments. In this case, much of the unfolded PET–TEG segments would lead to the decrease in fluorescence intensity. To verify this hypothesis, Tb3+/PET–TEG/Phen with different concentrations was prepared in DMF from 0.002 mol/L to 0.01 mol/L to investigate the fluorescence behaviour. It can be seen that there are four fluorescence emission peaks [31], with the strongest fluorescence emission peak being the 5D4–7F5 transition. With the increasing concentration, the fluorescence intensity increased. However, the intensity reached the maximum at the concentration of 0.006 mol/L, where a further increase in concentration leads to fluorescence fading. Limited solubility of PET–TEG segments in DMF induced the excess of folded PET–TEG segments, which caused Tb3+ fluorescence quenching. These results also implied the potential usage of SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen not only in crystallization enhancement, but also in fluorescent polymers.

3.4. Morphological Characterization

Figure 4 showed the TEM images and the elements content of SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen. The SiO2 is monodisperse with an average size of around 150 nm. The nanoparticles are discrete without connection, indicating a clean surface (Figure 4a). For comparison, the SiO2–TEG exhibited a coating outside the SiO2 surface and crosslinked with each other (Figure 4b). This solidly proved that the TEG-moieties successfully grafted onto SiO2. As shown in Figure 4c, the SiO2 sphere turned to be more irregular, indicating the Tb3+/PET–TEG/Phen moieties had been grafted. SEM-EDS and elemental analysis demonstrated the presence of C, O, Si, and Tb (Figure 4d, Figure S4), and further proved the successful synthesis of SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen. The content of Si and Tb was 2.02 and 0.01 wt %, respectively, corresponding to SiO2 and TbCl3 (Table 3), which is in accordance with the experimental operation of SiO2–PET–TEG and Tb3+/PET–TEG/Phen.
Figure 5 shows the high-magnification field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images; from the figure, we can see that the nano-SiO2 aggregates more seriously in PET, the size of the agglomerates is not uniform, and the average size is more than 250 nm. After modification, its dispersion in PET increases and agglomeration decreases [32]. In addition, TEG–PET is grafted on the surface of SiO2, making the nucleating agent more compatible with the PET matrix, and the size of the part of the nucleating agent dispersed in PET is 100–150 nm.

3.5. Crystallization Behaviour of PET/SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3 Phen Hybrid

The synthesized SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen was used as an additive to blend with PET, obtaining SiO2/Tb–PET hybrids. The crystallization of PET samples was measured with differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). The effect of SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen on the crystallization of PET can be characterized by the cold-crystallization temperature (Tcc) and melt-crystallization temperature (Tmc) of PET samples, where lower Tcc or higher Tmc corresponds to the higher crystallization rate.
Figure 6 shows the crystallization behavior of pristine PET, as well as that with different amounts of additives, namely 1%, 2%, and 3% of SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen. Obviously, the Tmc of PET increased greatly with the addition of SiO2@PET–TEG–PET (2%) and SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen (2%) (Figure S3a). According to the calculated crystallinity (Table 4), it can be found that, compared with SiO2, the addition of Tb3+ in the SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen did not contribute too much in the crystallization of PET hybrids, indicating that the SiO2 played the significantly effect to enhance the crystallinity.
The presence of the benzene ring in the main chain structure of the polymer molecule made it unfavorable for molecule chain movement, which led to a low crystallization rate and poor crystallinity [33,34]. With the addition of SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen as additives, the polymer segments that grafted on the surface of SiO2 afford SiO2 possess excellent compatibility with the PET matrix and resulted in a good dispersibility [35]. Taking advantage of that, the internal structure of PET polymer was changed and the chain mobility was improved. Thus, the SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen act as a nucleating agent, and promoted the crystallization rate and crystallinity of PET. Most importantly, the incorporated Tb3+ affords the PET hybrid excellent fluorescent properties with light emission at 550 nm, which can be processed to be fluorescent fiber and film in the fields of textile and capacitors [36].

3.6. Effects on Environment

With the wide spread application, PET waste disposal poses a serious problem to maintaining a clean environment [37]. However, it should be pointed out that PET does not create a direct hazard to the environment, but because of its substantial fraction by volume in the waste stream and its high resistance to the atmospheric and biological agents, it is seen as a noxious material.
To ease the threat to environment, PET recycling seems to be the best way for environmental remediation. As one of the world’s most recyclable polymer [38], PET with functional ester groups can be cleaved by some reagents, such as water (hydrolysis), alcohols (alcoholysis), acids (acidolysis), glycols (glycolysis), and amines (aminolysis). The polymer backbone is degraded into monomer units (i.e., depolymerisation) or randomly ruptured into larger chain fragments (i.e., random chain scission) with associated formation of gaseous products. Therefore, monomers, petroleum liquids, and gases can be yielded through chemical recycling, and furthermore, monomers are purified by distillation and drying and used for manufacture of polymers.

4. Conclusions

In summary, inorganic SiO2 nanoparticles and rare earth Tb3+ ions were effectively linked with PET–TEG polymeric segments to form a hybrid polymer through a systematic strategy. Fluorescence characterization showed good fluorescence properties of the hybrid polymer and the quench mechanism was investigated. As an additive to PET, the SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen hybrid polymer was well blended with PET matrix to improve the Tc and Tm by 5.7% and 7.3%, respectively, with respect to pure PET. The improved crystallinity was ascribed to the portion of SiO2 nanoparticles, which function as nucleation sites. The Tb3+ acted as the fluorescent centre, and the PET–TEG segments played the role of linker and buffer to contribute better dispersibility of SiO2 nanoparticles in the PET matrix. Overall, this work paves a way for the synthesis of multifunctional polymer hybrids to meet the needs in industrial and biomedical fields such as display screens and drug delivery indicator.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/12/3/568/s1, Figure S1: The distribution analysis of molecular weight of PET–TEG; Figure S2: The XRD spectra of PET containing different content of SiO2@Tb3+(PET-TEG)3 Phen a: 0%, b: 1%, c: 2%, d: 3%; Figure S3: The DSC cooling Tc(a) and heating Tm(b) curves of different content of SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen a: 0%, b: 1%, c: 2%, d: 3%; Figure S4: The SEM-EDS image of SiO2@Tb3+(PET-TEG)3 Phen; Table S1: Thermodynamic performance of composites.

Author Contributions

Y.W. (Yao Wang) and J.T. conceived and designed the experiments; Y.Z. performed the experiments; Y.Z., H.L., and X.G. analyzed the data; J.L., W.W., Z.Z., Y.W. (Yanxin Wang), and L.H. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Y.Z., H.L., and X.G. wrote the paper; Project administration, L.A.B. Authorship must be limited to those who have contributed substantially to the work reported. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by (1) the Natural Scientific Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51373081, 51473082, 51878361); (2) State Key Project of International Cooperation Research (2017YFE0108300, 2016YFE0110800).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by (1) the Natural Scientific Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51373081, 51473082, 51878361); (2) State Key Project of International Cooperation Research (2017YFE0108300, 2016YFE0110800); (3) Shandong double-hundred project; (4) the Program for Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (“111” plan); (5) The National One-Thousand Foreign Expert Program (Grant No. WQ20123700111); (6) The 1st level discipline program of Shandong Province of China; (7) Natural Scientific Foundation of Shandong Province (Grant No. ZR2019MEM048).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Al-Sabagh, A.; Yehia, F.; Eshaq, G.; Elmetwally, A. Ionic Liquid-Coordinated Ferrous Acetate Complex Immobilized on Bentonite as a Novel Separable Catalyst for PET Glycolysis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 12474–12481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bizer, C.; Lehmann, J.; Kobilarov, G.; Auer, S.; Becker, C.; Cyganiak, R.; Hellmann, S. DBpedia—A Crystallization Point for the Web of Data. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 2009, 7, 154–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Uzgiris, E.E.; Kornberg, R.D. Two-dimensional crystallization technique for imaging macromolecules, with application to antigen–antibody–complement complexes. Nature 1983, 301, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chung, S.C.; Hahm, W.G.; Im, S.S.; Oh, S.G. Poly(ethylene terephthalate)(PET) nanocomposites filled with fumed silicas by melt compounding. Macromol. Res. 2002, 10, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tsai, T.Y.; Naveen, B.; Shiu, W.C.; Lu, S.W. An advanced preparation and characterization of the PET/MgAl-LDH nanocomposites. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 25683–25691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tian, X.; Zhang, X.; Liu, W.; Zheng, J.; Ruan, C.; Cui, P. Preparation and Properties of Poly(ethylene terephthalate)/Silica Nanocomposites. J. Macromol. Sci. Part B 2006, 45, 507–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, L.; Huang, R.; Zhang, L.; Hong, S. A new mechanism in the formation of PET extended-chain crystal. Polymer 2001, 42, 2085–2089. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hong, H.; Jiang, S.; An, L.; Feng, J. Influence of Shear on Crystallization Behavior of the β Phase in Isotactic Polypropylene with β-Nucleating Agent. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 2478–2483. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hu, Z.; Deibert, B.J.; Jing, L. ChemInform Abstract: Luminescent Metal-Organic Frameworks for Chemical Sensing and Explosive Detection. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5815–5840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hu, R.; Liu, Y.-R.; Kong, R.-M.; Donovan, M.J.; Zhang, X.-B.; Tan, W.; Shen, G.-L.; Yu, R.-Q. Double-strand DNA-templated formation of copper nanoparticles as fluorescent probe for label free nuclease enzymedetection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 42, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Maillard, D.; Kumar, S.K.; Rungta, A.; Benicewicz, B.C.; Prud’homme, R.E. Polymer-Grafted-Nanoparticle Surfactants. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 4569–4573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, Y.; Biradar, A.V.; Duncan, C.T.; Asefa, T. Silica nanosphere-supported shaped Pd nanoparticles encapsulated with nanoporous silica shell: Efficient and recyclable nanocatalysts. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 7834–7841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zeng, C.; Lee, L.J. Poly(methyl methacrylate) and Polystyrene/Clay Nanocomposites Prepared by in-Situ Polymerization. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 4098–4103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. WHO. Multidrug and extensively drug-resistant TB (M/XDR-TB): 2010 global report on surveillance and response. Indian J. Tuberc. 2010, 57, 180–191. [Google Scholar]
  15. Knopp, D.; Dianping, T.; Reinhard, N. Review: Bioanalytical applications of biomolecule-functionalized nanometer-sized doped silica particles. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 647, 14–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Santra, S.; Bagwe, R.P.; Dutta, D.; Stanley, J.T.; Walter, G.A.; Tan, W.; Moudgil, B.M.; Mericle, R.A. Synthesis and Characterization of Fluorescent, Radio-Opaque, and Paramagnetic Silica Nanoparticles for Multimodal Bioimaging Applications. Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 2165–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xu, H.; Goedel, W.A. Polymer−Silica Hybrid Monolayers as Precursors for Ultrathin Free-Standing Porous Membranes. Langmuir 2002, 18, 2363–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, J.H.; Li, X.S.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Guo, L.; Feng, Y.Q. Application of liquid phase deposited titania nanoparticles on silica spheres to phosphopeptide enrichment and high performance liquid chromatography packings. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 2944–2953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Padua, L.M.G.; Yeh, J.-M.; Santiago, K.S. A Novel Application of Electroactive Polyimide Doped with Gold Nanoparticles: As a Chemiresistor Sensor for Hydrogen Sulfide Gas. Polymers 2019, 11, 1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Li, Q. Multifunctional Ionogels Incorporated with Lanthanide (Eu(3+), Tb(3+)) Complexes Covalently Modified Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Polymers 2018, 10, 1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Yang, W.; Yu, J.; Xi, X.; Sun, Y.; Shen, Y.; Yue, W.; Zhang, C.; Jiang, S. Preparation of Graphene/ITO Nanorod Metamaterial/U-Bent-Annealing Fiber Sensor and DNA Biomolecule Detection. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Xie, Y.; Sun, J.; Han, X.; Tursic-Wunder, A.; Toh, J.D.W.; Hong, W.; Gao, Y.-G.; Miao, Y. Polarisome scaffolder Spa2-mediated macromolecular condensation of Aip5 for actin polymerization. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Mahabadi, H.K.; Rudin, A. Effect of Solvent on Concentration Dependence of Hydrodynamic Volumes and GPC Elution Volumes. Polym. J. 1979, 11, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Sanches, N.B.; Dias, M.L.; Pacheco, E. Comparative techniques for molecular weight evaluation of poly (ethylene terephthalate)(PET). Polym. Test. 2005, 24, 688–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wan, Y.-J.; Tang, L.-C.; Gong, L.-X.; Yan, D.; Li, Y.-B.; Wu, L.-B.; Jiang, J.-X.; Lai, G.-Q. Grafting of epoxy chains onto graphene oxide for epoxy composites with improved mechanical and thermal properties. Carbon 2014, 69, 467–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yuan, B.; Bao, C.; Song, L.; Hong, N.; Liew, K.M.; Hu, Y. Preparation of functionalized graphene oxide/polypropylene nanocomposite with significantly improved thermal stability and studies on the crystallization behavior and mechanical properties. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 237, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kim, K.; Shin, J.W.; Lee, Y.B.; Cho, M.Y.; Lee, S.H.; Park, D.H.; Jang, D.K.; Lee, C.J.; Joo, J. Poly(3-hexylthiophene)/Multiwalled Carbon Hybrid Coaxial Nanotubes: Nanoscale Rectification and Photovoltaic Characteristics. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4197–4205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Parvinzadeh, M.; Moradian, S.; Rashidi, A.; Yazdanshenas, M.-E. Surface characterization of polyethylene terephthalate/silica nanocomposites. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 256, 2792–2802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Y.; Tang, J.; Zheng, H.; Sun, W.; Jiao, J.; Wang, Y.; Huang, L.; Liu, J.; Wang, W.; Shen, W. Crystallization of Poly(ethylene terephthalate) via Silica Nanoparticles Tethered with Short Diblock PEG-PET Copolymers. Sci. Adv. Mater. 2016, 8, 1603–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mormino, M.G.; Fier, P.S.; Hartwig, J.F. Copper-mediated perfluoroalkylation of heteroaryl bromides with (phen)CuRF. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 1744–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chung, K.; Tomljenovic-Hanic, S. Emission Properties of Fluorescent Nanoparticles Determined by Their Optical Environment. Nanomaterials 2015, 5, 895–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Antoniadis, G.; Paraskevopoulos, K.M.; Bikiaris, D.; Chrissafis, K. Non-isothermal crystallization kinetic of poly (ethylene terephthalate)/fumed silica (PET/SiO2) prepared by in situ polymerization. Thermochim. Acta 2010, 510, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, B.; Zhong, W.-H. Review on polymer/graphite nanoplatelet nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 2011, 46, 5595–5614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cheng, H.K.F.; Sahoo, N.G.; Tan, Y.P.; Pan, Y.; Bao, H.; Li, L.; Chan, S.H.; Zhao, J. Poly(vinyl alcohol) Nanocomposites Filled with Poly(vinyl alcohol)-Grafted Graphene Oxide. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 2387–2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Batal, A.B.; Douglas, M.W.; Engram, A.E.; Parsons, C.M. Protein dispersibility index as an indicator of adequately processed soybean meal. Poult. Sci. 2000, 79, 1592–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shortreed, M.; Kopelman, R.; Kuhn, M.; Hoyland, B. Fluorescent Fiber-Optic Calcium Sensor for Physiological Measurements. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 1414–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sinha, V.; Patel, M.R.; Patel, J.V. PET waste management by chemical recycling: A review. J. Polym. Environ. 2010, 18, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shent, H.; Pugh, R.J.; Forssberg, E. A review of plastics waste recycling and the flotation of plastics. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 1999, 25, 85–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 12 00568 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Illustration of the synthetic route for SiO2@Tb3+(poly(ethylene terephthalate)-tetraglycol)3 phenanthroline (SiO2@Tb3+(PET-TEG)3Phen).
Scheme 1. Illustration of the synthetic route for SiO2@Tb3+(poly(ethylene terephthalate)-tetraglycol)3 phenanthroline (SiO2@Tb3+(PET-TEG)3Phen).
Polymers 12 00568 sch001
Polymers 12 00568 g001 550
Figure 1. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of SiO2, SiO2–tetraglycol (TEG), SiO2@Tb3+(poly(ethylene terephthalate)–TEG)3 phenanthroline (SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen), PET–TEG, and Tb3+/PET–TEG/Phen.
Figure 1. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of SiO2, SiO2–tetraglycol (TEG), SiO2@Tb3+(poly(ethylene terephthalate)–TEG)3 phenanthroline (SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen), PET–TEG, and Tb3+/PET–TEG/Phen.
Polymers 12 00568 g001
Polymers 12 00568 g002 550
Figure 2. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of C1s deconvolution curves for (a) SiO2–TEG and (b) SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen.
Figure 2. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of C1s deconvolution curves for (a) SiO2–TEG and (b) SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen.
Polymers 12 00568 g002
Polymers 12 00568 g003 550
Figure 3. Fluorescence emission spectra of the polymer solution (a) and the microspectrophotometer emission spectra of different complexes (a: b3+/PET–TEG/Phen; b: SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen); fluorescence excitation spectra at different concentrations (b) (polymer solution concentrations of a–e: 0.01, 0.002, 0.004, 0.008, and 0.006 mol/L, respectively).
Figure 3. Fluorescence emission spectra of the polymer solution (a) and the microspectrophotometer emission spectra of different complexes (a: b3+/PET–TEG/Phen; b: SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen); fluorescence excitation spectra at different concentrations (b) (polymer solution concentrations of a–e: 0.01, 0.002, 0.004, 0.008, and 0.006 mol/L, respectively).
Polymers 12 00568 g003
Polymers 12 00568 g004 550
Figure 4. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of (a) SiO2 nanoparticles (NPs), (b) SiO2–TEG, and (c) SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen; and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)-EDS image (d).
Figure 4. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of (a) SiO2 nanoparticles (NPs), (b) SiO2–TEG, and (c) SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen; and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)-EDS image (d).
Polymers 12 00568 g004
Polymers 12 00568 g005 550
Figure 5. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images of composites (a) PET/SiO2; (b) PET/SiO2–TEG–PET.
Figure 5. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images of composites (a) PET/SiO2; (b) PET/SiO2–TEG–PET.
Polymers 12 00568 g005
Polymers 12 00568 g006 550
Figure 6. The differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) cooling Tc (a) and heating Tm (b) curves of a: PET, b: 2%SiO2–PET–TEG, and c: 2%SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3phen.
Figure 6. The differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) cooling Tc (a) and heating Tm (b) curves of a: PET, b: 2%SiO2–PET–TEG, and c: 2%SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3phen.
Polymers 12 00568 g006
Table
Table 1. The molecular weight of poly(ethylene terephthalate)–tetraglycol (PET–TEG).
Table 1. The molecular weight of poly(ethylene terephthalate)–tetraglycol (PET–TEG).
SampleMnMwMw/Mn
LMPET11,50029,0952.531
PET–TEG24,52030,1301.229
Table
Table 2. Atomic percentage of elements on sample surface.
Table 2. Atomic percentage of elements on sample surface.
SampleMass Fraction/%
C1sO1sSi2pTb3dN1s
SiO28.6562.5728.79----
SiO2–TEG12.7459.7927.47----
SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3Phen52.6536.639.610.790.33
Table
Table 3. Content of elemental microanalysis (SEM-EDS) of SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3 Phen.
Table 3. Content of elemental microanalysis (SEM-EDS) of SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3 Phen.
ElementsCOSiTb
Atomic wt %76.3221.652.020.01
Table
Table 4. Thermodynamic performance of composites.
Table 4. Thermodynamic performance of composites.
SampleW (%)Tc (°C)Tm (°C)∆Hc (J/g)∆Hm (J/g)Xc (%)
PET0211.15244.3244.3843.0130.72
SiO2–PET–TEG/PET2224.01261.8645.8845.2733.00
SiO2@Tb3+(PET–TEG)3/PET2223.48262.0745.9145.3333.04

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, H.; Gong, X.; Liu, J.; Huang, L.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Belfiore, L.A.; et al. Fluorescent SiO2@Tb3+(PET-TEG)3Phen Hybrids as Nucleating Additive for Enhancement of Crystallinity of PET. Polymers 2020, 12, 568. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12030568

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Wang Y, Li H, Gong X, Liu J, Huang L, Wang W, Wang Y, Zhao Z, Belfiore LA, et al. Fluorescent SiO2@Tb3+(PET-TEG)3Phen Hybrids as Nucleating Additive for Enhancement of Crystallinity of PET. Polymers. 2020; 12(3):568. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12030568

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yanna, Yao Wang, Hao Li, Xuezhong Gong, Jixian Liu, Linjun Huang, Wei Wang, Yanxin Wang, Zhihuan Zhao, Laurence A. Belfiore, and et al. 2020. "Fluorescent SiO2@Tb3+(PET-TEG)3Phen Hybrids as Nucleating Additive for Enhancement of Crystallinity of PET" Polymers 12, no. 3: 568. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12030568

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop