Next Article in Journal
Balanced Viscoelastic Properties of Pressure Sensitive Adhesives Made with Thermoplastic Polyurethanes Blends
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Biocompatibility of Multi-Layered, 3D Bio-Printed Artificial Vessels Composed of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Macromolecular Brushes Based on Poly(L-Lactide) and Poly(ε-Caprolactone) Single and Double Macromonomers via ROMP. Synthesis, Characterization and Thermal Properties
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Electrospun Poly(caprolactone) Fiber Diameter for Vascular Scaffolds to Maximize Smooth Muscle Cell Infiltration and Phenotype Modulation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Application of DNA Quadruplex Hydrogels Prepared from Polyethylene Glycol-Oligodeoxynucleotide Conjugates to Cell Culture Media

1
Department of Chemistry and Materials Engineering, Kansai University, 3-3-35 Yamate, Suita, Osaka 564-8680, Japan
2
Collaborative Research Center of Engineering, Medicine, and Pharmacology, ORDIST, Kansai University, 3-3-35 Yamate, Suita, Osaka 564-8680, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2019, 11(10), 1607; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11101607
Submission received: 13 July 2019 / Revised: 20 September 2019 / Accepted: 28 September 2019 / Published: 2 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomimetic Polymer-Based Matrices for Regenerative Medicine)

Abstract

:
Application of Na+-responsive DNA quadruplex hydrogels, which utilize G-quadruplexes as crosslinking points of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) network as cell culture substrate, has been examined. PEG-oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) conjugate, in which four deoxyguanosine (dG4) residues are tethered to both ends of PEG, was prepared by modified high-efficiency liquid phase (HELP) synthesis of oligonucleotides and used as the macromonomer. When mixed with equal volume of cell culture media, the solution of PEG-ODN turned into stiff hydrogel (G-quadruplex hydrogel) as the result of G-quadruplex formation by the dG4 segments in the presence of Na+. PEG-ODN itself did not show cytotoxicity and the resulting hydrogel was stable enough under cell culture conditions. However, L929 fibroblast cells cultured in G-quadruplex hydrogel remained spherical for a week, yet alive, without proliferation. The cells gradually sedimented through the gel day by day, probably due to the reversible nature of G-quadruplex formation and the resulting slow rearrangement of the macromonomers. Once they reached the bottom glass surface, the cells started to spread and proliferate.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Recent development of various hydrogels with unique properties is attracting scientists not only from material chemistry, but also from broad research areas such as medical science to the field [1,2]. DNA is one of the well-studied components used to prepare hydrogels [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11], because of its sophisticated functions as a fruit of previous studies in DNA computing and structural DNA nanotechnology [12,13]. Not only regular duplexes [4], but also four-stranded structures called “G-quadruplex” and “i-motif” are often used to construct DNA hydrogels due to their attractive features: metal ion or pH responsiveness [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. We have recently developed a new class of hydrogels utilizing such DNA quadruplexes as cross-linking points of the 3D polymer network [25,26,27]. Polyethylene glycol-oligodeoxynucleotide (PEG-ODN) conjugates bearing merely four deoxyguanosine residues (dG4) for G-quadruplexes or five deoxycytidine residues (dC5) for i-motifs at the ends of linear or four-way branched PEG, were prepared as macromonomers by applying high-efficiency liquid phase (HELP) synthesis of oligonucleotides developed by Bonora et al. with a few modifications [28]. This technique enabled us to prepare typically 10−20 g of PEG-ODN conjugates in laboratories and to overcome the size-barrier of popular solid-phase DNA synthesis [29], which only produces oligonucleotides in less than milligrams. PEG-dG4 conjugates prepared as such gave intelligent, biodegradable, and self-healing hydrogels (G-quadruplex hydrogels), which turned into hydrogel quite rapidly upon addition of various body-related fluids containing Na+, such as serum, artificial sweat or tear, or even simple phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Na+-responsive G-quadruplex hydrogels, thus, have been considered as a potentially useful biomaterial for widespread biomedical applications.
In this study, another possible application of G-quadruplex hydrogel as cell culture scaffold has been studied (Figure 1). Hydrogel formation in response to Na+ in typical cell culture media was first examined. After the stability of the resulting G-quadruplex hydrogels under cell culture conditions was confirmed, the hydrogels were treated together with L929 mouse fibroblast cells to estimate cytotoxicity of the hydrogels. Cell behaviors on/in G-quadruplex hydrogels were then examined.

2. Results and Discussion

We chose L4.6k-dG4 [25], in which four dG residues were coupled to both of the ends of linear PEG4.6k with modified HELP synthesis (Figure 1b), as the macromonomer to prepare G-quadruplex hydrogels. When equal volume of 2×Eagle′s minimal essential medium (E-MEM) was added to 30 wt % L4.6k-dG4 stock solution, quite stiff hydrogel, which was still stable even at 37 °C, was obtained (Figure 2a). Concentration of Na+ in 1×E-MEM is ca. 120 mM and it is far above the critical gelation concentration for Na+, which is ca. 20 mM for 15 wt % L4.6k-dG4 hydrogel [25]. The resulting hydrogel was also stable under continuous exposure to cell culture media (Figure 2b). When double the volume of 1×E-MEM was added on to 15 wt % L4.6k-dG4 hydrogel, the gel swelled up to 350% weight ratio within 2 days; kept the weight for about 5 days, then almost linearly lost weight in the next 7 days.
We then examined cytotoxicity of the PEG-ODN conjugate (Figure 2c). Aqueous L4.6k-dG4 solution was diluted from 1 wt % with equal volume of 1×E-MEM (containing FBS) in five stages down to 0.031 wt % and was added to L929 fibroblast culture. Cell viability after 24 h in the presence of L4.6k-dG4, estimated with WST-8 assays, was all within 60–90% without significant difference for any concentration. Even addition of 1 wt % L4.6k-dG4 solution resulted in 90% viability, showing that cytotoxicity of L4.6k-dG4 is almost negligible.
Next, L929 fibroblast cells were applied to and cultured on G-quadruplex hydrogels (Figure 3). Cells were applied to the surface of 15 wt % G-quadruplex hydrogel containing 1×E-MEM and incubated for a predetermined time before being treated with LIVE/DEAD® assay kit. Even after 1 day of incubation, most of the cells stayed spherical and tended to aggregate with each other. The aggregates became larger over time, though most of the cells were still alive. Some (ca. 7%) extended cells were observed after 3 days. After 7 days, the majority (ca. 70%) of the cells were extended ones on the bottom of the well. Cells probably sedimented gradually through the hydrogel keeping their spherical shape, as the 3D network of PEG in G-quadruplex hydrogel can be slowly rearranged due to the reversible nature of G-quadruplexes, and finally adhered to the glass substrate in the bottom to start proliferation.
The above argument was further confirmed by z-stack 3D analysis of the hydrogel using a CLSM (Figure 4). The cells labeled with CellTracker™ Green dye and deposited on 15 wt % G-quadruplex hydrogel were initially found within 200–300 nm (12% population) and 300–400 nm (88%) zones from the bottom (Figure 4a). The majority of the cells then moved to 100–200 nm (40%) and 0–100 nm (24%) zones in 1 day, while those that stayed in 300–400 nm were ca. 36% of the total population (Figure 4b). After 2 days, almost half of the cells (46%) reached the bottom of the well, whereas the populations in 300–400 and 100–200 nm zones were both 27% (Figure 4c).

3. Conclusions

It is shown that Na+-responsive G-quadruplex hydrogels are not harmful for living cells, but, just like in many other PEG-based hydrogels [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37], the cells cultured in G-quadruplex hydrogels stay spherical and do not proliferate since they cannot adhere to the matrix. The addition of other substrates that allow cell adhesion such as collagen to hydrogel matrix may solve this problem and promote cell proliferation [36,37]. The present system with high biocompatibility and biodegradability might provide efficient cell storage media that does not require freezing as well—if the observed sedimentation of the cells can be prevented, for example, by adjusting the specific gravity of G-quadruplex hydrogels [38,39,40].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

PEG-ODN conjugate used in this study (L4.6k-dG4) was synthesized with modified-HELP according to the method described in reference [25]. Eagle′s minimal essential medium (E-MEM), 10×phosphate buffered saline (PBS(-)), and 1×PBS(-) were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical (Osaka, Japan). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from BioWest (Nuaillé, France). WST-8 Cell Proliferation Assay Kit was purchased from Dojindo Laboratories (Kumamoto, Japan). LIVE/DEAD® Viability/Cytotoxicity Kit and CellTracker™ Green CMFDA dye were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Whaltham, MA, USA). L929 mouse fibroblast cells were obtained from ECACC.

4.2. Preparation of G-Quadruplex Hydrogel Involving 1×E-MEM

For preparation of 15 wt % L4.6k-dG4 hydrogel, 35.3 mg of L4.6k-dG4 was first dissolved in 100 µL of milliQ water in a glass test tube to give 30 wt % stock solution, then 100 µL of 2×E-MEM was added dropwise to the mixture.

4.3. Exposure of G-Quadruplex Hydrogel to Cell Culture Media

An amount of 400 µL of 1×E-MEM was added onto 15 wt % L4.6k-dG4 hydrogel prepared as above and the system was incubated at 37 °C. After predetermined time, the supernatant was collected and the remaining hydrogel was weighed. Collected supernatant was then returned to the system for further measurements.

4.4. Cytotoxicity Estimation of PEG-ODN Conjugate

L929 mouse fibroblast cells (5 cells/µL in 100 µL 1×E-MEM (containing FBS)) were first cultured in 96-well plates at 37 °C for 24 h and then the supernatant was removed. Aqueous L4.6k-dG4 conjugate solution was diluted from 1 wt % with equal volume of 1×E-MEM (containing FBS) in 5 stages and added to each well. After 21 h, 10 µL of WST-8 mixture was added; the absorbance at 450 nm was measured 3 h later by using a microplate reader (BIO-RAD iMarkTM Microplate Reader).

4.5. Culture of Cells Deposited on G-Quadruplex Hydrogel Surface

In 96-well plates, 15 wt % L4.6k-dG4 hydrogels were prepared. First, 30 wt % L4.6k-dG4 stock solution was prepared as described above. Then, 35 μL of the stock solution and 35 μL of 2×E-MEM were added to each well and mixed thoroughly by pipetting until gelation. L929 fibroblast cell suspension (50 cells/µL, 100 µL) was slowly loaded onto the hydrogels and incubated for a predetermined time. After the supernatant was removed, the hydrogels were washed once with 1×PBS(-). Then, 100 μL of LIVE/DEAD® assay solution, containing calcein AM and EthD-1, was added to each well and the plate was incubated for another 2 h. Fluorescence from the cells (green for calcein representing living cells and red for EthD-1 for dead cells) was observed with a confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM 800). For CLSM z-stack 3D analysis, cells were labeled with CellTracker™ Green dye according to the instruction manual provided in the kit before application to the wells.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.T. and A.K.; methodology, S.T. and S.Y.; validation, S.T., S.Y., Y.H., Y.O. and A.K.; formal analysis, S.T., S.Y., Y.H. and A.K.; investigation, S.T., S.Y., Y.H. and A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, S.T. and A.K.; writing—review and editing, S.T., Y.O. and A.K.; visualization, S.T., S.Y., Y.H. and A.K.; supervision, A.K.; project administration, Y.O. and A.K.; funding acquisition, Y.O. and A.K.

Funding

This research was funded by Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology (PRESTO), “Molecular Technology and Creation of New Functions” from Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) (JPMJPR12K4), Private University Research Branding Project (2016-2021), Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) (16H01854), (B) (24350088), for Challenging Research (Pioneering) (17K19211) and (19K22261), Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas “Molecular Robotics” (24104004) and “Molecular Engine” (19H05407) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, Culture and Technology, Japan, Research Program and Research Program for Next Generation Young Scientists of “Five-star Alliance” in “NJRC Mater. & Dev.”, and from Nihon L’Oréal.

Acknowledgments

We thank T. Sakai for synthesizing ODN-PEG complexes, and Prof. T. Kato for valuable discussion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Ahmed, E.M. Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications: A review. J. Adv. Res. 2015, 6, 105–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hoffman, A.S. Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xiong, X.; Wu, C.; Zhou, C.; Zhu, G.; Chen, Z.; Tan, W. Responsive DNA-based hydrogels and their applications. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2013, 34, 1271–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shao, Y.; Jia, H.; Cao, T.; Liu, D. Supramolecular hydrogels based on DNA self-assembly. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kahn, J.S.; Hu, Y.; Willner, I. Stimuli-responsive DNA-based hydrogels: From basic principles to applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 680–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Um, S.H.; Lee, J.B.; Park, N.; Kwon, S.Y.; Umbach, C.C.; Luo, D. Enzyme-catalysed assembly of DNA hydrogel. Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 797–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Umeno, D.; Kano, T.; Maeda, M. Affinity adsorption separation of mutagenic molecules by polyacrylamide hydrogels comprising double-stranded DNA. Anal. Chim. Acta 1998, 365, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liedl, T.; Dietz, H.; Yurke, B.; Simmel, F. Controlled trapping and release of quantum dots in a DNA-swichable hydrogel. Small 2007, 3, 1688–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Qi, H.; Ghodousi, M.; Du, Y.; Grun, C.; Bae, H.; Yin, P.; Khademhosseini, A. DNA-directed self-assembly of shape-controlled hydrogels. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Song, J.; Im, K.; Hwang, S.; Hur, J.; Nam, J.; Ahn, G.-O.; Hwang, S.; Kim, S.; Park, N. DNA hydrogel delivery vehicle for light-triggered and synergistic cancer therapy. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 9433–9437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bomboi, F.; Romano, F.; Leo, M.; Fernandez-Castanon, J.; Cerbino, R.; Bellini, T.; Bordi, F.; Filetici, P.; Sciortino, F. Re-entrant DNA gels. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Adleman, L.M. Molecular computation of solutions to combinatorial problems. Science 1994, 266, 1021–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Seeman, N.C. Nucleic acid junctions and lattices. J. Theor. Biol. 1982, 99, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tanaka, S.; Kuzuya, A. Hydrogels utilizing G-quadruplexes. MOJ Poly. Sci. 2017, 1, 00033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wei, B.; Cheng, I.; Luo, K.Q.; Mi, Y. Capture and release of protein by a reversible DNA-induced sol-gel transition system. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 331–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Shao, Y.; Li, C.; Zhou, X.; Chen, P.; Yang, Z.; Li, Z.; Liu, D. Responsive polypeptide-DNA hydrogel crosslinked by G-quadruplex. Acta Chim. Sin. 2015, 73, 815–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xiang, B.; He, K.; Zhu, R.; Liu, Z.; Zeng, S.; Huang, Y.; Nie, Z.; Yao, S. Self-assembled DNA hydrogel based on enzymatically polymerized DNA for protein encapsulation and enzyme/DNAzyme hybrid cascade reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 22801–22807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, Z.; Liu, B.; Liu, J. Molecular imprinting for substrate selectivity and enhanced activity of enzyme mimics. Small 2017, 13, 1602730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, H.; Jiang, G.; Weng, J.; Ma, Q.; Zhang, H.; Ito, Y.; Liu, M. A signal-accumulating DNAzyme- crosslinked hydrogel for colorimetric sensing of hydrogen peroxide. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 4648–4651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hasuike, E.; Akimoto, A.M.; Kuroda, R.; Matsukawa, K.; Hiruta, Y.; Kanazawa, H.; Yoshida, R. Reversible conformational changes in the parallel type G quadruplex structure inside a thermoresponsive hydrogel. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 3142–3144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, Y.; Xu, W.; Liu, G.; Tian, L. A Pure DNA Hydrogel with Stable Catalytic Ability Produced by One-Step Rolling Circle Amplification. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 3038–3041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lu, C.-H.; Qi, X.-J.; Orbach, R.; Yang, H.-H.; Mironi-Harpaz, I.; Seliktar, D.; Willner, I. Switchable Catalytic Acrylamide Hydrogels Cross-Linked by Hemin/G-Quadruplexes. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 1298–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kahn, J.S.; Trifonov, A.; Cecconello, A.; Guo, W.; Fan, C.; Willner, I. Integration of Switchable DNA-Based Hydrogels with Surfaces by the Hybridization Chain Reaction. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 7773–7778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lu, C.-H.; Guo, W.; Qi, X.-J.; Neubauer, A.; Paltiel, Y.; Willner, I. Hemin−G-Quadruplex-Crosslinked Poly-N-Isopropylacrylamide Hydrogel: A Catalytic Matrix for the Deposition of Conductive Polyaniline. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 6659–6664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tanaka, S.; Wakabayashi, K.; Fukushima, K.; Yukami, S.; Maezawa, R.; Takeda, Y.; Tatsumi, K.; Ohya, Y.; Kuzuya, A. Intelligent, Biodegradable, and Self-Healing Hydrogels Utilizing DNA Quadruplexes. Chem. Asian J. 2017, 12, 2388–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tanaka, S.; Chan, S.K.; Lim, T.S.; Ohya, Y.; Kuzuya, A. DNA Quadruplex Hydrogel Beads Showing Peroxidase Activity. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166, B3271–B3273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tanaka, S.; Yukami, S.; Fukushima, K.; Wakabayashi, K.; Ohya, Y.; Kuzuya, A. Bulk pH-Responsive DNA Quadruplex Hydrogels Prepared by Liquid-Phase, Large-Scale DNA Synthesis. ACS Macro Lett. 2018, 7, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bonora, G.M.; Zaramella, S.; Veronese, F.M. Synthesis by High-Efficiency Liquid-Phase (HELP) Method of Oligonucleotides Conjugated with High-Molecular Weight Poly (ethylene glycols) (PEGs). Biol. Proced. Online 1998, 1, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ellington, E.; Pollard, J.D. Synthesis and Purification of Oligonucleotides. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2001, 42, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Burdick, J.A.; Anseth, K.S. Photoencapsulation of osteoblasts in injectable RGD-modified PEG hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2002, 32, 4315–4323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nuttelman, C.R.; Tripodi, M.C.; Anseth, K.S. Synthetic hydrogel niches that promote hMSC viability. Matrix Biol. 2005, 24, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kloxin, A.M.; Kasko, A.M.; Salinas, C.N.; Anseth, K.S. Photodegradable hydrogels for dynamic tuning of physical and chemical properties. Science 2009, 324, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Huebsch, N.; Arany, P.R.; Mao, A.S.; Shvartsman, D.; Ali, O.A.; Bencherif, S.A.; Rivera-Feliciano, J.; Mooney, D.J. Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 518–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Phelps, E.A.; Enemuchukwu, N.O.; Fiore, V.F.; Sy, J.C.; Murthy, N.; Sulchek, T.A.; Barker, T.H.; García, A.J. Maleimide Cross-Linked Bioactive PEG Hydrogel Exhibits Improved Reaction Kinetics and Cross-Linking for Cell Encapsulation and in Situ Delivery. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kim, H.D.; Heo, J.; Hwang, Y.; Kwak, S.Y.; Park, O.K.; Kim, H.; Varghese, S.; Hwang, N.S. Extracellular-Matrix-Based and Arg-Gly-Asp–Modified Photopolymerizing Hydrogels for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Tissue Eng. Part A 2015, 21, 757–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sargeant, T.D.; Desai, A.P.; Banerjee, S.; Agawu, A.; Stopek, J.B. An in situ forming collagen-PEG hydrogel for tissue regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Noh, M.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, J.; Lee, J.R.; Jeong, G.J.; Yoon, J.K.; Kang, S.; Bhang, S.H.; Yoon, H.H.; Lee, J.C.; et al. Graphene oxide reinforced hydrogels for osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 20779–20788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Zhang, C.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wu, L.; Chen, Y.; Xie, D.; Chen, W. Hydrogel Cryopreservation System: An Effective Method for Cell Storage. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Choi, J.; Konno, T.; Ishihara, K. Phospholipid polymer multilayered hydrogels for releasing cell growth factor protein. Biomater. Biomed. Eng. 2014, 1, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yan, C.; Mackay, M.E.; Czymmek, K.; Nagarkar, R.O.; Schneider, J.P.; Pochan, D.J. Injectable solid peptide hydrogel as a cell carrier: Effects of shear flow on hydrogels and cell payload. Langmuir 2012, 28, 6076–6087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration of cell culture on/in G-quadruplex hydrogels. Wavy blue lines represent poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) segments. Upon the addition of cell culture media to L4.6k-dG4 conjugate solution, tetradeoxyguanosine (dG4) segments immediately form G-quadruplexes in response to Na+, to crosslink PEG segments into a 3D network. L929 fibroblast cells, either dispersed in the hydrogel or adhered to the bottom of the well, are presented in green circles or stars, respectively. (b) Chemical structure of L4.6k-dG4.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration of cell culture on/in G-quadruplex hydrogels. Wavy blue lines represent poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) segments. Upon the addition of cell culture media to L4.6k-dG4 conjugate solution, tetradeoxyguanosine (dG4) segments immediately form G-quadruplexes in response to Na+, to crosslink PEG segments into a 3D network. L929 fibroblast cells, either dispersed in the hydrogel or adhered to the bottom of the well, are presented in green circles or stars, respectively. (b) Chemical structure of L4.6k-dG4.
Polymers 11 01607 g001
Figure 2. (a) Photographs of 20 wt % L4.6k-dG4 before (left) and after (right) the addition of equal volume of 2×E-MEM. (b) Swelling and erosion profile of DNA quadruplex hydrogels in 1×E-MEM at 37 °C. (c) WST-8 cell viability assay of L929 mouse fibroblast cells treated with L4.6k-dG4 solution. Cells were cultured in 96-well plates in the presence of L4.6k-dG4 at various concentrations for 24 h. Cells without L4.6k-dG4 treatment were used as negative control. Cell viability was 84 ± 9, 82 ± 22, 67 ± 11, 71 ± 8, 83 ± 5, and 90 ± 11% in 0.031, 0.063, 0.13, 0.25, 0.50, and 1.0 wt % L4.6k-dG4 solution, respectively.
Figure 2. (a) Photographs of 20 wt % L4.6k-dG4 before (left) and after (right) the addition of equal volume of 2×E-MEM. (b) Swelling and erosion profile of DNA quadruplex hydrogels in 1×E-MEM at 37 °C. (c) WST-8 cell viability assay of L929 mouse fibroblast cells treated with L4.6k-dG4 solution. Cells were cultured in 96-well plates in the presence of L4.6k-dG4 at various concentrations for 24 h. Cells without L4.6k-dG4 treatment were used as negative control. Cell viability was 84 ± 9, 82 ± 22, 67 ± 11, 71 ± 8, 83 ± 5, and 90 ± 11% in 0.031, 0.063, 0.13, 0.25, 0.50, and 1.0 wt % L4.6k-dG4 solution, respectively.
Polymers 11 01607 g002
Figure 3. Fluorescence microscope images of cultured L929 fibroblast cells deposited on the surface of DNA quadruplex hydrogels. Cells with green fluorescence are alive, whereas dead cells are stained in red.
Figure 3. Fluorescence microscope images of cultured L929 fibroblast cells deposited on the surface of DNA quadruplex hydrogels. Cells with green fluorescence are alive, whereas dead cells are stained in red.
Polymers 11 01607 g003
Figure 4. Confocal laser scanning fluorescence microscope (CLSM) 3D images of L929 fibroblast cells labeled with CellTracker™ Green dye and deposited on 15 wt % L4.6k-dG4 hydrogels after 0 day (a), 1 day (b), and 2 days (c).
Figure 4. Confocal laser scanning fluorescence microscope (CLSM) 3D images of L929 fibroblast cells labeled with CellTracker™ Green dye and deposited on 15 wt % L4.6k-dG4 hydrogels after 0 day (a), 1 day (b), and 2 days (c).
Polymers 11 01607 g004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tanaka, S.; Yukami, S.; Hachiro, Y.; Ohya, Y.; Kuzuya, A. Application of DNA Quadruplex Hydrogels Prepared from Polyethylene Glycol-Oligodeoxynucleotide Conjugates to Cell Culture Media. Polymers 2019, 11, 1607. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11101607

AMA Style

Tanaka S, Yukami S, Hachiro Y, Ohya Y, Kuzuya A. Application of DNA Quadruplex Hydrogels Prepared from Polyethylene Glycol-Oligodeoxynucleotide Conjugates to Cell Culture Media. Polymers. 2019; 11(10):1607. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11101607

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tanaka, Shizuma, Shinsuke Yukami, Yuhei Hachiro, Yuichi Ohya, and Akinori Kuzuya. 2019. "Application of DNA Quadruplex Hydrogels Prepared from Polyethylene Glycol-Oligodeoxynucleotide Conjugates to Cell Culture Media" Polymers 11, no. 10: 1607. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11101607

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop