Next Article in Journal
Hot Electron Plasmon-Resonant Grating Structures for Enhanced Photochemistry: A Theoretical Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Computational Study of Structural, Molecular Orbitals, Optical and Thermodynamic Parameters of Thiophene Sulfonamide Derivatives
Previous Article in Journal
The Relative Contribution of Solutal Marangoni Convection to Thermal Marangoni Flow Instabilities in a Liquid Bridge of Smaller Aspect Ratios under Zero Gravity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

One-Pot Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Water-Soluble Pyran-2,4,5-triol Glucose Amine Schiff Base Derivative: XRD/HSA Interactions, Crystal Structure, Spectral, Thermal and a DFT/TD-DFT

1
Department of Chemistry and Earth Sciences, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
2
Qatar Environment and Energy Research Institute, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, Doha 34110, Qatar
3
Laboratory of Materials, Nanotechnology and Environment, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed V University, 4 Av. Ibn Battuta, Rabat PO B.P. 1014, Morocco
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2021, 11(2), 117; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11020117
Submission received: 11 January 2021 / Revised: 21 January 2021 / Accepted: 22 January 2021 / Published: 26 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Crystals at Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

:
The(3R,4R,6R)-3-(((E)-2-hydroxybenzylidene)amino)-6-(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2,4,5-triol water-soluble Glucose amine Schiff base (GASB-1) product was made available by condensation of 2-hydroxybenzaldehyde with (3R,6R)-3-amino-6-(hydroxymethyl)-tetra-hydro-2H-pyran-2,4,5-triol under mono-mode microwave heating. A one-pot 5-minute microwave-assisted reaction was required to complete the condensation reaction with 90% yield and without having byproducts. The 3D structure of GASB-1 was solved from single crystal X-ray diffraction data and computed by DFT/6-311G(d,p). The Hirshfeld surface analysis (HSA), molecular electronic potential (MEP), Mulliken atomic charge (MAC), and natural population analysis (NPA) were performed. The IR and UV-Vis spectra were matched to their density functional theory (DFT) relatives and the thermal behavior was resolved in an open-room condition via thermogravimetry/Derivative thermogravimetry (TG/DTG) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The highest occupied molecular orbital/lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (HOMO/LUMO), density of state (DOS), and time-dependence TD-DFT computations were correlated to the experimental electron transfer in water and acrylonitrile solvents.

1. Introduction

Glucose amine Schiff bases (GASBs) are common chiral organic compounds that were synthesized decades ago [1,2,3,4,5]. GASBs are an important class of artificial compounds since they have several applications in many life fields [6]. For example, such Schiff bases from food derivatives are used in antibacterial, antimicrobial, antiviral, and other biological activities [7]. Moreover, they have been used in tumor cell imaging, conductive polymers, and optical sensors, as well as for detection of amino acids, fluoride, iron, and other heavy metals [8,9,10].
In terms of complexes, the greatest benefits of GASBs as ligands are their solubility in water and multidentate coordination possibilities. Moreover, the ring conformations or configurations of the pyran ring in glucose center increase the chance of bonding in different coordination modes. The complexes of such GASBs with metal ions have several applications as catalysts, for example, in oxygenations, hydrolysis, and anticorrosion [11,12,13,14,15]. The presence of several chiral centers loaded in GASBs backbone increases the possibility of using their complexes to prepare chiral catalysts or chiral reagents. For example, vanadium oxides/GASB was used in chiral oxidation of sulfides [16].
Recently, microwave technology has been used in Schiff base preparation instead of traditional methods, as this technology has achieved global acceptance in accelerating the reaction and increasing its selectivity, which has reduced the formation of side products. Moreover, the displayed reactions without or with a minimum number of solvents has increased the chance of imposing green chemistry technology [17,18,19].
In this work, we report efficient ecofriendly microwave synthesis under mild condition of a water-soluble sugar derivative GASB-1 within 5 min at 60 °C under microwave heating conditions. The pyran chair conformation structure was confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (XRD) where no ring opening was detected. Furthermore, the XRD/Hirshfeld surface analysis (HSA) interactions and XRD/DFT analyses were performed, and the physicochemical properties, such as IR and UV-visible, were matched to B3LYP and TD-DFT, respectively. The thermal properties were also evaluated through TG/DTG and DSC.

2. Experimental

2.1. Measurements

The Fourier transform infrared spectrum (FT-IR) (MID. 4000–400 cm−1) was recorded in solid state using a PerkinElmer Spectrum 1000 FT-IR Spectrometer (PerkinElmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The UV-Vis measurements were performed in water solvent using a TU-1901 double-beam spectrophotometer (Purkinje General Instrument Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The TG spectra were recorded using a TGA-7 PerkinElmer (PerkinElmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) in 25 to 600 °C temperature range and with heat rate = 5 °C min−1. The microwave reactions were carried out with a Biotage initiator 8 instrument (Biotage, Uppsala, Sweden).

2.2. Computational

The crystallographic CIF file generated from single-crystal XRD was taken as reference for HSA calculations using the CRYSTAL EXPLORER software (version 17, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia) [20]. All the DFT calculations were carried out using gaussian (revision 09, Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, CT, USA) software and considering a gaseous state at DFT/B3LYP/6-311G(d.p) [21]. The DFT data were visualized using GaussSum (Version3.9, Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, CT, USA) [22] and Gaussview software (version 05; Semichem Inc., Shawnee, OK, USA) [23].

2.3. Crystal Data

Suitable single crystals for X-ray diffraction were selected based on the size and sharpness of the diffraction spots. The data collections were carried out on a D8 Venture diffractometer using Cu-Kα radiation (Bruker GmbH, Berline, Germany). Data processing and all refinements were performed with the APEX3 and Jana2006 program package, respectively [24,25]. Multiscan absorption corrections using SADABS were applied for data collection details, as shown in Table 1.

2.4. GASB-1 Synthesis

Glucosamine hydrochloride (0.884 gm, 1 mmol) was treated in 4 mL ethanol with triethylamine. To the mixture, salicylaldehyde (0.432 mL, 1.1 mmol) was added in a microwave vial. The vial was capped and heated in the microwave synthesizer at 60 °C for 5 min, which led immediately to the formation of a bright yellow precipitate. The vial was then cooled to room temperature. The yellow solid was filtered and washed with cold ethanol then recrystallized from ethanol to afford the desired GASB-1 (90%) as bright-yellow crystals. Recrystallization from ethanol again provided very nice yellow crystals which were used for X-ray diffraction.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microwave Synthesis

The use of microwave-assisted techniques in the preparation of Schiff bases is of high interest in the organic green synthesis field. The condensation of (3R,6R)-3-amino-6-(hydroxymethyl)-tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2,4,5-triol with 2-hydroxybenzaldehyde under nonroutine microwaved condition using ethanol solvent revealed the formation of the desired GASB-1 in 90% yield, as illustrated in Scheme 1. A 5-minute reaction is required to synthesize the desired ligand without byproducts. Moreover, microwave-assisted techniques involve simple handling, making them a cheaper and quicker synthetic method than the classical methods reported [16,17,18,19].

3.2. XRD and DFT

The desired ligand was subjected to XRD and DFT calculation, and the Oak Ridge Thermal Ellipsoid Plot (ORTEP) and B3LYP/6-311G(d,p)-optimized diagram are illustrated in Figure 1a,b, respectively. The DFT/XRD angles and bond lengths are illustrated in Table 2. A packing diagram, viewed down the b axis, is given in Figure 1c. The desired compound was crystallized in a monoclinic, C2 space group (Z = 4). The stair-like structure is two-dimensional. In the flat aromatic ring C8-C9-C0-C11-C12-C13, all the carbon atoms have an sp2 hybridization, whereas in the pyranose ring O1-C1-C2-C3-C4-O5, which has a chair conformation [26] with the puckering parameters Q = 0.584(9) Å, θ = 2.6(9)° and φ = 65(16)° [27], all the atoms have an sp3 hybridization.
The experimental XRD angles and bond distances were emulated to the DFT/B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) as showed in Figure 2. The bonds lengths reflected a high proper between calculated and measured (Figure 2a) with 0.977 correlation coefficient as seen in Figure 2b. The DFT/XRD angles values reflected a high degree of similarity (Figure 2c) with a 0.941 correlation coefficient as seen Figure 2d.

3.3. XRD Packing and HSA

In the XRD packing result, several short interactions stabilized the crystal lattice of the desired Schiff base, as seen in Table 3 and Figure 3. The first interaction was detected as an intra-hydrogen bond, such as O-H….N=C, with 1.864 Å forming a close S6 as seen in Figure 3a. The second type of interaction was 1D hydrogen bond, such as Ph-H….O-C with 2.580 Å, resulting a continuous chain as seen in Figure 3b. The third type was 2D-S6-synthon with two hydrogen bonds, such as O-H….O, with 1.953 Å and Ph-H…O with 2.563 Å, as seen in Figure 3c. The fourth type was a 2D-S4 synthon with three hydrogen bonds of type O-H….O with 2.089 Å, 2.568 Å, and 2.005 Å, as seen in Figure 3d. The fifth interaction was H…πC9-C8 type with 2.840 Å as seen in Figure 3e.
The HSA calculation of the prepared Schiff base was carried using the CIF file generated from single crystal XRD. The interactions were shown as a red point on the GASB-1 surface [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. The desired Schiff base contains many OH and O atoms in the sugar part together with N=C in the Schiff base part. Therefore, nine red spots were detected by dnorm on the surface, reflecting the presence of different types of [OH….O] hydrogen bonds connected the computed surface of the molecule with its surrounding neighboring molecules. Moreover, a big red spot occurred around the N atom due to the [O-H….N] intra-hydrogen bond (Figure 4a). The presence of only one type of H….πC=C interaction was confirmed by the shape index as seen in Figure 4b. Moreover, the fingerprint (FP) H-to-atom connection ratio plot reflected the diversity of the percentage contribution. The highest interaction ration was H····H bonds contribution with 45.5%, while the lowest interaction ration was N····H contribution with 0.5%. The FP result revealed all the H-connections percentage contributions in the following order: [H···H>O····H(14.6%)>C····H(8.9%)>N····H(0.5%)].

3.4. Molecular Electrostatic Potential (MEP), Mulliken Atomic Charge (MAC), and Natural Population Analysi (NPA)

On the surface of the desired molecule, the MEP calculation revealed the presence of red (nucleophilic), blue (electrophilic), and green (not polarized) positions [26,27,28,29,30]. All the O and N atoms and some C atoms were nucleophilic in their nature. Moreover, all the H atoms attached to O atoms were blue in color, resulting in electrophilic centers (Figure 5a). The other centers in the compounds were green since they were in between electrophilic and nucleophilic centers. The presence of H, acceptors together with electron donor centers, encourage the formation of intra-[H….N] and inter-[H….O] hydrogen bonds.
The NPA and MAC supported the MEP result in founding both e-rich/poor atoms sites on the molecule. The NPA- and MAC-computed charges revealed all the atoms with a negative or positive quantity of charge as represented in Figure 5b and Table 4. Usually, the NPA displayed higher atomic charges compared to the MAC. As expected, the MAC and NPA evidenced all O, N, C1-C6, and C13 atoms with negative charges and all the H, C14-C17, and C12 atoms are with positive charges. H31 is among the highest atoms with a positive charge. Therefore, it is responsible for forming the intra-H-bond of type O-H….N bond. The NPA and MAC charge model reflected a high degree of matching, and R2 = 0.9462 was detected, as shown in Figure 5c. The MAC, NPA, and MEP data are highly harmonic with HSA and XRD results.

3.5. IR, B3LYP, and NMR Investigation

In the IR spectrum shown in Figure 6a, the stretching vibration bands at 3405 cm−1, 3070 cm−1, 2960–2860 cm−1, 1630 cm−1, 1200–1000 cm−1, and 1100–900 cm−1 are characteristic of the functional groups O-H, Cph-H, CMe-H, C=N, C=C, C-O, and C-N, respectively. Furthermore, the DFT-IR/B3LYP/6–311G(d,p) in gaseous state supported the experimental IR analysis with the presence of O-H at 3480 cm−1, Cph-H at 3120 cm−1, CMe-H at 2980–2880 cm−1, C=N at 1610 cm−1, C=C at 1230 cm−1, C-O at 1280–1090 cm−1, and C-N at 750–840 cm−1, as shown in Figure 6b. The experimental/DFT-IR showed a high affinity with a high coefficient (R2 = 0.998) as recorded in Figure 6c.
The structure of GASB-1 was elucidated and confirmed by the data obtained from the 1H NMR and 13C-NMR spectra in DMSO-d6 presented in Figure 7a and Figure 7b, respectively. In the 1HNMR, the spectra displayed several bands. The sugar protons were recorded at 2.5–5.5 ppm, the aromatic protons at 6.5–7.5 ppm, and the acidic phenolic proton and imine proton appeared at 13.20 ppm 8.25 ppm, respectively. In 13C-NMR, the sugar carbons were detected in between 60–100 ppm, the aromatic carbons in between 115–135 ppm, and the imine and phenolic carbon signals appeared at 167.21 ppm and 160.99 ppm, respectively (see the experimental part). The protons and carbons NMR chemical shifts are consistent with the proposed structure solved by single-crystal XRD.

3.6. HOMO/LUMO and Absorption/TD-DFT

The HOMO→LUMO orbital shapes (Figure 8a) and energy diagrams were performed using GaussView 5.0 software. The LUMO and HOMO molecular orbital energy levels both had negative values. Thus, the stability and softness of the GASB-1 were increased. The ΔEHOMO/LUMO was found to be 1.730 eV, whereas the ΔEDOS was 1.784 eV. A negligible deviation between the two methods was detected.
The UV-visible for the desired sugar derivative Schiff base was measured in water and acetonitrile solvents in the scale of 200–800 nm, parallel to that ground-state TD-DFT/B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) scale of theory computation. The measurement was performed to collect the oscillator strength (f), vertical excitation energies and absorption wavelength (nm) as seen in Table 5. The λmax in the spectrum reconciled to vertical excitation as per the Frank–Condon principle. Both of theoretical and experimental spectra are plotted in Figure 8b. The experimental UV-visible in water indicated the presence of four peaks. The first three bands at λmax = 215 nm, 255 nm, and 328 nm are attributed to π→π*, π→n, and n→π* electron transfer in the desired Schiff base, respectively. Meanwhile, the fourth peak, which was detected at λmax = 395 nm, can be attributed to the dissociation of the phenol to form the phenolate ion in aqueous polar medium as indicated in Scheme 2. The absence of this band in nonpolar solvent as CH3CN confirmed this aspect (Figure 8b).
The DFT calculations for B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) in the same solvents demonstrated the presence of three main bands at λmax = 247.5 nm, 309.1 nm, and 545.9 nm, with oscillator strengths of 0.5811, 0.0205, and 0.0116, respectively. The band at 247.5 nm can be attributed to the contributions of HOMO-1→LUMO+1(97%) and HOMO-2→LUMO+1(3%). The second band at 309.1 nm was due to HOMO-2→LUMO(20%), HOMO-1→LUMO(73%) HOMO-4→LUMO (5%), and the third band at 545.9 nm was due to HOMO→LUMO+1(100%) electron transfers. In the TD-DFT of the GASB-1, the protic (water) and aprotic (acetonitrile) solvents showed similar behavior. Moreover, a good agreement between the experimental and the theoretical solvato-behavior using protic and aprotic solvents was recorded.

3.7. Thermal Analysis

TG/DTG and DSC thermal analyses of the desired GASB were performed in the temperature ranges of 25 °C to 500 °C and 25 °C to 300 °C with the heating rate of 5 °C min−1, respectively. The results are illustrated in Figure 9a,b, respectively. GASB-1 decomposed in a one-step process in between 200–300 °C and showed a high stability up to ~200 °C. With TDTG = 196 °C, 100% of mass loss (complete decomposition) was recorded as seen Figure 9a. The DSC was consistent with the TG/DTG. During the heating process from 25 °C to 300 °C, the first peak was due to recrystallization at T = 188 °C followed by a decomposition peak at T = 196 °C. In the reversed cooling process, no peaks were detected (Figure 9b). This confirms the total decomposition of the compound during the heating process.

4. Conclusions

The desired water-soluble GASB-1 was made available via the one-pot microwave-assisted synthesis method, and its monoclinic structure (space group C2) was confirmed by single-crystal XRD analysis for the first time. The XRD/HSA-interactions was corroborated by MEP, MAC, and NPA analyses. Several types of short interactions, such as intra-[H…N] and inter-[H…O] hydrogen bonds in addition to H…πC=C, were observed. The calculated DFT angles and bond distances revealed a high matching with the experimental XRD data. The HOMO/LUMO and DOS, together with the computed TD-SCF B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) in water and acetonitrile, reflected an excellent agreement with experimental UV-Visible in the same solvents. The GASB was found to be stable below 196 °C and went through a simple one-step decomposition mechanism.

Author Contributions

Y.H.; Conceptualization, methodology, investigation and editing, R.R.; investigation and formal analysis, H.B.Y.; investigation and visualization, S.M.; investigation, A.Z.; software, I.W.; investigation and writing—original draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was made possible by NPRP grant # 7-495-1-094 from Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation). The findings achieved herein are solely the responsibility of the authors. The authors acknowledge the support by Qatar University through grant # QUCG-CAS-20/21-1.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge The Central Laboratory Unit, Qatar University for recording NMR spectra and the contribution of the Core Labs at Qatar Environment and Energy Research Institute (QEERI) at Hamad Bin Khalifa University (HBKU) for the single crystal XRD data analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Weng, Q.; Yi, J.; Chen, X.; Luo, D.; Wang, Y.; Sun, W.; Kang, J.; Han, Z. Rising from the horizon: Three-dimensional functional architectures assembled with MXene nanosheets. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 24864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Safoura, F. Novel Synthesis of Schiff bases Bearing Glucosamine Moiety. Res. J. Chem. Sci. 2014, 4, 25. [Google Scholar]
  3. Thanh, D.; van Quoc, N. Study on Synthesis of 2-(Substituted Benzylidene)amino-2-Deoxy-1,3,4,6-Tetra-O-Acetyl-β-D-Glucopyranoses from D-Glucosamine. Lett. Org. Chem. 2013, 10, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Appelt, R.; Oliveira, S.; Santos. Synthesis and Antimicrobial Activity of Carbohydrate Based Schiff Bases: Importance of Sugar Moiety. V. Int. J. Carbohy. Chem. 2013, 2013, 320892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, Y.; Liu, P. Synthesis of Novel D-glucosamine Schiff Bases. Chinese J. Synthetic Chem. 2006, 14, 523. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ghoneim, A.; El-Sherif, A. Review on Synthesis of N-glucosylamine Derivatives and Their Biological Activity. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2019, 11, 20. [Google Scholar]
  7. Garoufis, A.; Hadjikakou, K.; Hadjiliadis. Palladium coordination compounds as anti-viral, anti-fungal, anti-microbial and anti-tumor agents. N. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2009, 253, 1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rao, P.; Chinta, P.; Mitra, A. Selective Detection of Aromatic Alpha-Amino Acids and Derivatives Thereof. US20120091355A1, 19 October 2010. [Google Scholar]
  9. Arabahmadi, R. Amani, Azo Schiff bases as colorimetric and fluorescent sensors for recognition of F−, Cd2+ and Hg2+ ions. S. Supramol. Chem. 2014, 26, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mitra, A.; Ramanujam, B.; Rao, P. 1-(d-Glucopyranosyl-2-deoxy-2-iminomethyl)-2-hydroxynaphthalene as chemo-sensor for Fe3+ in aqueous HEPES buffer based on colour changes observable with the naked eye. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Feng, J.; Le, F.; Luo, H.Q. Synthesis and Characterization of Cobalt(III) Zinc(II) and Copper(II) Complexes with N-Salicylaldehyde-D-Glucosamine and N,O-Vanillin-D-Glucosamine. Synth. React. Inorg. Met. Org. Chem. 1998, 28, 1105. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ye, Y.; Hu, J.; Feng, C.; Zeng, Y. Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic and Metal-Organic Chemistry. Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci. 1997, 2, 467. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gupta, C.; Sutar, K. Coordin. Coordination chemistry of some new Cu(II), Ni(II) and Co(II) macroacyclic (N2O4) Schiff base complexes: X-ray crystal structure of Cu(II) complex. Chem. Rev. 2008, 252, 1420. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bagherzadeh, M.; Amini, M.; Derakhshandeh, G.; Haghdoost. An efficient glucose-based ligand for Heck and Suzuki coupling reactions in aqueous media. A. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2014, 11, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vikneshvaran, S.; Velmathi, S. Impact of Halide-Substituted Chiral Schiff Bases on Corrosion Behaviour of Carbon Steel in Acidic Environment. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2019, 19, 4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Costamagna, J.; Lillo, E.; Matsuhiro, B.; Noseda, D.; Villagrán, M. Ni(II) complexes with Schiff bases derived from amino sugars. Carbohydr. Res. 2003, 338, 1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chauhan, D.S.; Mazumder, M.A.J.; Quraishi, M.A.; Ansari, K.R.; Suleiman, R.K. Microwave-assisted synthesis of a new Piperonal-Chitosan Schiff base as a bio-inspired corrosion inhibitor for oil-well acidizing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 158, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Canton-Díaz, A.M.; Munoz-Flores, B.M.; Moggio, I.; Arias, E.; Turlakov, G.; Angel-Mosqueda, C.D.; Ramirez-Montes, P.I.; Jimenez-Perez, V.M. Molecular structures, DFT studies and their photophysical properties in solution and solid state. Microwave-assisted multicomponent synthesis of organotin bearing Schiff bases. Mol. Struct. 2019, 1180, 642–650. [Google Scholar]
  19. Antony, R.; Arun, T.; Manickam, S.T. A review on applications of chitosan-based Schiff bases. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 129, 615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wolff, S.K.; Grimwood, D.J.; McKinnon, J.J.; Jayatilaka, D.; Spackman, M.A. Crystal Explorer 2.1; University of Western Australia: Perth, Australia, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  21. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 09; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  22. O’Boyle, N.M.; Tenderholt, A.L.; Langner, K.M. A Library for Package-Independent Computational Chemistry Algorithms. J. Comp. Chem. 2008, 29, 839–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Dennington, R.; Keith, T.A.; Millam, J.M. GaussView Version; Semichem Inc.: Shawnee Mission, KS, USA, 2009; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
  24. Petricek, V.; Dusek, M.; Palatinus, L.; Kristallogr, Z. Crystallographic Computing System JANA2006: General features. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie-Crystalline Materials 2014, 229, 345–352. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bruker, APEX2, SAINT-Plus, XPREP and SADABS; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2004.
  26. Evans, G.G.; Boeyens, J.A. The linear space of ring conformations. Acta Cryst. 1989, 45, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cremer, D.; Pople, J.A. General Definition of ring puckering coordinates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Spackman, M.A.; Jayatilaka, D. Hirshfeld surface analysis. CrystEngComm 2009, 11, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sheldrick, G. SHELXL-97; Universitat Geottingen: Geottingen, Germany, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tabti, S.; Djedouani, A.; Aggoun, D.; Warad, I.; Rahmouni, S.; Romdhane, S.; Fouzi, H. Crystal interactions, computational, spectral and thermal analysis of (E)-N’-(thiophen-2-ylmethylene)isonicotinohydrazide as O-N-S-tridentate schiff base ligand. J. Mol. Struct. 2018, 1155, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Warad, I.; Abdoh, M.; al Ali, A.; Shivalingegowda, N.; Kumara, K.; Zarrouk, A.; Lokanath, N.K. Synthesis, spectra and X-ray crystallography of dipyridin-2-ylmethanone oxime and its CuX2(oxime)2 complexes: Thermal, Hirshfeld surface and DFT analysis. J. Mol. Struct. 2018, 1154, 619–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Warad, I.; Awwadi, F.F.; Al-Ghani, B.A.; Sawafta, A.; Shivalingegowda, N.; Lokanath, N.K.; Mubarak, M.S.; Hadda, T.B.; Zarrouk, A.; Al-Rimawi, F.; et al. Barghouthi, Ultrasound-assisted synthesis of two novel [CuBr(diamine)2·H2O]Br complexes: Solvatochromism, crystal structure, physicochemical, Hirshfeld surface thermal, DNA/binding, antitumor and antibacterial activities. S.A. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2018, 48, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Aouad, M.R.; Messali, M.; Rezki, N.; Al-Zaqri, N.; Warad, I. Single proton intramigration in novel 4-phenyl-3-((4-phenyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)methyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazole-5(4H)-thione: XRD-crystal interactions, physicochemical, thermal, Hirshfeld surface, DFT realization of thiol/thione tautomerism. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 264, 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Aouad, M.R.; Messali, M.; Rezki, N.; Said, M.A.; Lentz, D.; Zubaydi, L.; Warad, I. Synthesis and XRD of neutral NiL complex using unsymmetrical ONNO tetradentate schiff base: Hirschfeld, spectral, DFT and thermal analysis. J. Mol. Struct. 2019, 1180, 455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hijji, Y.; Benjamin, E.; Butcher, R.; Zarrouk, A.; Warad, I. Crystal structure, spectral, thermal and experimental/computational investigation of Anthracen-benzo [d] thiazol-2-amine new Schiff base derivative. J. Mol. Struct. 2021, 1229, 129824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Synthesis of desired compound GASB-1.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of desired compound GASB-1.
Crystals 11 00117 sch001
Figure 1. (a) ORTEP, (b) B3LYP/6-311G(d,p), and (c) packing diagrams viewed down the b axis.
Figure 1. (a) ORTEP, (b) B3LYP/6-311G(d,p), and (c) packing diagrams viewed down the b axis.
Crystals 11 00117 g001
Figure 2. (a) DFT/XRD bond length histogram and its (b) graphical correlation, (c) DFT/XRD angles histogram, and (d) graphical correlation.
Figure 2. (a) DFT/XRD bond length histogram and its (b) graphical correlation, (c) DFT/XRD angles histogram, and (d) graphical correlation.
Crystals 11 00117 g002
Figure 3. (a) OH…N intraH-bond, (b) Ph-H…O interH-bond, (c) 2D-S6-synthon, (d) 2D-S4 synthon, and (e) H…πC9-C8 interactions types in the GASB-1 lattice.
Figure 3. (a) OH…N intraH-bond, (b) Ph-H…O interH-bond, (c) 2D-S6-synthon, (d) 2D-S4 synthon, and (e) H…πC9-C8 interactions types in the GASB-1 lattice.
Crystals 11 00117 g003
Figure 4. (a) dnorm, (b) shape index.
Figure 4. (a) dnorm, (b) shape index.
Crystals 11 00117 g004
Figure 5. (a) Solid MEP, (b) open MEP, (c) MAC and NPA charges and (d) MAC vs. NPA relation.
Figure 5. (a) Solid MEP, (b) open MEP, (c) MAC and NPA charges and (d) MAC vs. NPA relation.
Crystals 11 00117 g005
Figure 6. (a) Experimental solid-state IR, (b) Gaseous-state DFT-IR, and (c) Experimental DFT-IR correlation.
Figure 6. (a) Experimental solid-state IR, (b) Gaseous-state DFT-IR, and (c) Experimental DFT-IR correlation.
Crystals 11 00117 g006
Figure 7. (a) 1H, (b) 13C-NMR of GASB-1 dissolved in DMSO-d6.
Figure 7. (a) 1H, (b) 13C-NMR of GASB-1 dissolved in DMSO-d6.
Crystals 11 00117 g007
Scheme 2. Dissociation of the phenolic Schiff base in water polar medium.
Scheme 2. Dissociation of the phenolic Schiff base in water polar medium.
Crystals 11 00117 sch002
Figure 8. (a) LUMO/HOMO, and (b) Abs./TD-DFT spectra in water and acetonitrile.
Figure 8. (a) LUMO/HOMO, and (b) Abs./TD-DFT spectra in water and acetonitrile.
Crystals 11 00117 g008
Figure 9. (a) TG/DTG and (b) DSC diagrams.
Figure 9. (a) TG/DTG and (b) DSC diagrams.
Crystals 11 00117 g009
Table 1. Refined data of the GASB-1 Crystal.
Table 1. Refined data of the GASB-1 Crystal.
Chemical FormulaC13H17NO6
CCDC2054297
Mr283.3
Flack parameter0.4(9)
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2
Temperature (K)150
a, b, c (Å)18.438 (3), 6.0431 (11), 13.133 (2)
β (°)117.486 (7)
V3)1298.1 (4)
Z4
Radiation typeCu Kα
µ (mm−1)0.98
Crystal size (mm)0.26 × 0.06 × 0.03
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker D8 VENTURE
Absorption correctionMulti-scan SADABS
Tmin, Tmax0.884, 1
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 4σ(I)] reflections4820, 1667, 674
Rint0.104
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.597
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S0.068, 0.228, 1.01
No. of reflections1667
No. of parameters196
No. of restraints10
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.39, −0.25
Absolute structure486 of Friedel pairs used in the refinement
Table 2. Elected X-ray diffraction (XRD)/DFT angles (o) and bond lengths (Å).
Table 2. Elected X-ray diffraction (XRD)/DFT angles (o) and bond lengths (Å).
No.BondXRDDFTNo.AngleXRDDFT
1O1C11.41(1)1.41718C1O1C5113.9(6)112.5
2O1C51.44(1)1.43419C2N1C7120.6(7)121.83
3O2C11.28(1)1.30220O1C1O2108.6(7)109.08
4O3C31.419(9)1.42221O1C1C2107.9(7)108.67
5O4C41.41(1)1.40522O2C1C2113.9(8)113.68
6O5C61.413(8)1.40523N1C2C1109.9(7)108.38
7O6C91.32(1)1.34224N1C2C3111.2(7)112.94
8N1C21.48(1)1.50225C1C2C3109.6(7)108.38
9N1C71.27(1)1.25426O3C3C2110.3(6)109.5
10C1C21.55(1)1.56127O3C3C4111.0(6)111.85
11C2C31.52(1)1.52128C2C3C4109.6(7)110.83
12C3C41.50(1)1.49829O4C4C3113.5(7)113.68
13C4C51.53(1)1.51530O4C4C5105.3(6)107.61
14C5C61.51(1)1.52131C3C4C5111.2(6)113.68
15C7C81.48(1)1.47632O1C5C4109.2(6)111.33
16C8C91.39(1)1.37233O1C5C6107.1(6)109.26
17C8C131.36(2)1.36734C4C5C6114.3(6)111.96
Table 3. All hydrogen bond types.
Table 3. All hydrogen bond types.
DonorHydrogenAcceptorD-H DistanceH...A DistanceD-A DistanceD-H...A Angle
O2H1O2O60.83(6)1.87(7)2.684(10)168(8)
O3H1O3O10.821(16)2.09(3)2.885(7)164(5)
O4H1O4O50.82(6)2.01(5)2.727(7)146(9)
O5H1O5O30.819(19)1.95(2)2.725(6)157.2(16)
O6H1O6N10.82(6)1.86(6)2.596(9)148(9)
Table 4. NPA and MAC charges.
Table 4. NPA and MAC charges.
No.AtomMACNBANo.AtomMACNBA
1C−0.0986−0.1948419O−0.39559−0.75684
2C−0.06331−0.1863820O−0.36058−0.60764
3C−0.14837−0.084821O−0.38535−0.72255
4C−0.02168−0.167322O−0.35858−0.71719
5C−0.09702−0.190523O−0.36984−0.6475
6C−0.08268−0.1875624N−0.30484−0.46408
7H0.0958390.1983825H0.2490190.44549
8H0.0877570.1980326H0.132980.26307
9H0.1098980.222827H0.2132060.37366
10H0.0990620.1988228H0.2109670.43698
11H0.0974450.1975429H0.2178240.44051
12C0.0971010.1280630H0.1187740.18125
13C−0.10795−0.0932831H0.2530560.4681
14C0.2059480.441532H0.1480580.20596
15C−0.069650.1973933H0.1444720.16871
16C0.1174450.1327634H0.1225540.17625
17C0.1033630.1296335H0.1152820.16932
18C−0.2357−0.5073436H0.1596580.1536
Table 5. TD-DFT data for GASB-1 in water.
Table 5. TD-DFT data for GASB-1 in water.
No.λ(nm)Osc. Str. (f)Major ContributionMinor Contribution
1545.90.0116HOMO->L+1(100%)
2317.10.0015H-2->LUMO(76%), H-1->LUMO(18%)H-4->LUMO(2%)
3309.10.0205H-2->LUMO(20%), H-1->LUMO(73%)H-4->LUMO(5%)
4307.30.0165H-6->LUMO(13%), H-5->LUMO(18%), H-4->LUMO(57%)H-7->LUMO(3%), H-1->LUMO(6%)
5294.20.0028H-2->L+1(93%)H-2->L+3(2%), H-1->L+1(3%)
6276.90.0073H-6->LUMO(73%), H-5->LUMO(20%)H-7->LUMO(4%)
7270.10.0035HOMO->L+3(86%), HOMO->L+4(14%)
8267.60.0303HOMO->L+3(13%), HOMO->L+4(84%)
9255.80.0121H-3->L+1(78%), H-1->L+2 (19%)H-1->L+1 (3%)
10247.50.5811H-1->L+1(97%)H-2->L+1 (3%)
11241.10.0104H-7->LUMO(86%)H-9->LUMO(3%), H-5->LUMO(9%)
12230.90.0007H-4->L+1(95%)HOMO->L+6(2%)
13230.10.0062HOMO->L+6(94%)H-4->L+1(2%)
14224.90.0126H-9->LUMO(14%), H-8->LUMO(76%)HOMO->L+5(8%)
15223.40.0047HOMO->L+5 (91%)H-9->LUMO(3%), H-8->LUMO(5%)
16218.70.0380H-9->LUMO(67%), H-8->LUMO(16%)H-10->LUMO(9%), H-7->LUMO(3%)
172150.0027H-5->L+1(88%)H-6->L+1(8%)
18207.30.0064HOMO->L+7(14%), HOMO->L+8(15%), HOMO->L+9(68%)
19204.80.0217HOMO->L+7(12%), HOMO->L+8(52%), HOMO->L+9(26%)H-1->L+2(4%)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hijji, Y.; Rajan, R.; Ben Yahia, H.; Mansour, S.; Zarrouk, A.; Warad, I. One-Pot Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Water-Soluble Pyran-2,4,5-triol Glucose Amine Schiff Base Derivative: XRD/HSA Interactions, Crystal Structure, Spectral, Thermal and a DFT/TD-DFT. Crystals 2021, 11, 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11020117

AMA Style

Hijji Y, Rajan R, Ben Yahia H, Mansour S, Zarrouk A, Warad I. One-Pot Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Water-Soluble Pyran-2,4,5-triol Glucose Amine Schiff Base Derivative: XRD/HSA Interactions, Crystal Structure, Spectral, Thermal and a DFT/TD-DFT. Crystals. 2021; 11(2):117. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11020117

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hijji, Yousef, Rajeesha Rajan, Hamdi Ben Yahia, Said Mansour, Abdelkader Zarrouk, and Ismail Warad. 2021. "One-Pot Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Water-Soluble Pyran-2,4,5-triol Glucose Amine Schiff Base Derivative: XRD/HSA Interactions, Crystal Structure, Spectral, Thermal and a DFT/TD-DFT" Crystals 11, no. 2: 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11020117

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop