Next Article in Journal
Piezoelectric Resonators Excited by Lateral Electric Fields Based on a LiTaO3 Single Crystal
Next Article in Special Issue
Finite Element Simulation of Multilayer Electron Beam Melting for the Improvement of Build Quality
Previous Article in Journal
Imprinting the Polytype Structure of Silicon Carbide by Rapid Thermal Processing
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Fracture Behavior and Mechanical Properties of a Support Structure for Additive Manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V
Open AccessReview

In Situ Monitoring Systems of The SLM Process: On the Need to Develop Machine Learning Models for Data Processing

1
SIRRIS, Rue du Bois Saint-Jean 12, 4102 Seraing, Belgium
2
CNRS, Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux INP, INRAE, I2M Bordeaux, F-33400 Talence, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2020, 10(6), 524; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10060524
Received: 27 May 2020 / Revised: 10 June 2020 / Accepted: 13 June 2020 / Published: 18 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Additive Manufacturing (AM) of Metallic Alloys)
In recent years, technological advancements have led to the industrialization of the laser powder bed fusion process. Despite all of the advancements, quality assurance, reliability, and lack of repeatability of the laser powder bed fusion process still hinder risk-averse industries from adopting it wholeheartedly. The process-induced defects or drifts can have a detrimental effect on the quality of the final part, which could lead to catastrophic failure of the finished part. It led to the development of in situ monitoring systems to effectively monitor the process signatures during printing. Nevertheless, post-processing of the in situ data and defect detection in an automated fashion are major challenges. Nowadays, many studies have been focused on incorporating machine learning approaches to solve this problem and develop a feedback control loop system to monitor the process in real-time. In our study, we review the types of process defects that can be monitored via process signatures captured by in situ sensing devices and recent advancements in the field of data analytics for easy and automated defect detection. We also discuss the working principles of the most common in situ sensing sensors to have a better understanding of the process. Commercially available in situ monitoring devices on laser powder bed fusion systems are also reviewed. This review is inspired by the work of Grasso and Colosimo, which presented an overall review of powder bed fusion technology. View Full-Text
Keywords: L-PBF; in situ sensing; quality assurance; machine learning L-PBF; in situ sensing; quality assurance; machine learning
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Yadav, P.; Rigo, O.; Arvieu, C.; Le Guen, E.; Lacoste, E. In Situ Monitoring Systems of The SLM Process: On the Need to Develop Machine Learning Models for Data Processing. Crystals 2020, 10, 524.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop