Next Article in Journal
Surface Display—An Alternative to Classic Enzyme Immobilization
Previous Article in Journal
Structure-Activity Relationship of Manganese Oxide Catalysts for the Catalytic Oxidation of (chloro)-VOCs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fast Method for Testing the Photocatalytic Performance of Modified Gypsum
Open AccessReview

Gas Phase Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction, “A Brief Overview for Benchmarking”

1
Department of Energy Science & Engineering, DGIST, 333 Techno Jungang-daero, Hyeonpung-eup, Dalseong-gun, Daegu 42988, Korea
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, 1.5 KM Defence Road, Off Raiwind Road, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Catalysts 2019, 9(9), 727; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9090727
Received: 31 July 2019 / Revised: 19 August 2019 / Accepted: 19 August 2019 / Published: 28 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Applications of Photocatalytic Processes)
Photocatalytic CO2 reduction is emerging as an affordable route for abating its ever increasing concentration. For commercial scale applications, many constraints are still required to be addressed. A variety of research areas are explored, such as development of photocatalysts and photoreactors, reaction parameters and conditions, to resolve these bottlenecks. In general, the photocatalyst performance is mostly adjudged in terms of its ability to only produce hydrocarbon products, and other vital parameters such as light source, reaction parameters, and type of photoreactors used are not normally given appropriate attention. This makes a comprehensive comparison of photocatalytic performance quite unrealistic. Hence, probing the photocatalytic performance in terms of apparent quantum yield (AQY) with the consideration of certain process and experimental parameters is a more reasonable and prudent approach. The present brief review portrays the importance and impact of aforementioned parameters in the field of gas phase photocatalytic CO2 reduction. View Full-Text
Keywords: apparent quantum yield; organic contaminations; photocatalyst; solar; CO2 reduction; photoreactors apparent quantum yield; organic contaminations; photocatalyst; solar; CO2 reduction; photoreactors
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Ali, S.; Flores, M.C.; Razzaq, A.; Sorcar, S.; Hiragond, C.B.; Kim, H.R.; Park, Y.H.; Hwang, Y.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, H.; Gong, E.H.; Lee, J.; Kim, D.; In, S.-I. Gas Phase Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction, “A Brief Overview for Benchmarking”. Catalysts 2019, 9, 727.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop