Next Article in Journal
Ga/HZSM-5 Catalysed Acetic Acid Ketonisation for Upgrading of Biomass Pyrolysis Vapours
Previous Article in Journal
Eucalyptol as a Bio-Based Solvent for Buchwald-Hartwig Reaction on O,S,N-Heterocycles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magnetic Chitosan-Supported Silver Nanoparticles: A Heterogeneous Catalyst for the Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol

Department of Chemistry, College of Sciences, Research Institute of Science and Engineering, University of Sharjah, P.O. Box 27272, Sharjah, UAE
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2019, 9(10), 839; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9100839
Submission received: 15 September 2019 / Revised: 5 October 2019 / Accepted: 8 October 2019 / Published: 10 October 2019

Abstract

:
Developing heterogeneous catalyst using chitosan (CS) and magnetic Fe3O4 as support has been remarkably attractive due to their availability, low cost and non-toxicity. In this work, a heterogeneous catalyst (denoted as Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag) was fabricated by the deposition of silver nanoparticles on magnetic chitosan via an easy and facile modification of its surface with methyl salicylate (MS). The catalyst was characterized using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffractometer (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). To the best of our knowledge, for the first time, CS decorated Fe3O4 (Fe3O4@CS) has shown the catalytic activity for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol (4-NP) to 4-aminophenol (4-AP) in presence of NaBH4. Surface modified magnetic chitosan (Fe3O4@CS@MS) also acts as active catalyst towards the reduction of 4-NP. However, catalytic efficiency has increased fourfold when silver-nanoparticles-deposited magnetic chitosan (Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag) used as our target catalyst. The catalyst was separated with external magnet after each cycle of catalytic reaction and reused effectively five times with almost 90% efficiency.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Many researchers are focusing on the development of sustainable materials by minimizing waste and pollution in the chemical synthesis. Literature survey reports that the catalyst used at least one step in more than 90% of industrial multi-step synthesis processes [1]. Generally, homogenous catalysts have some advantages such as easily dissolving in reaction media, active sites of catalysts are radially available for the substrates, monitoring real-life mechanistic study and good selectivity towards desired products [2]. However, heterogeneous catalysts are given priority over homogenous catalysts in the industrial application regarding the easy separation of the catalyst from the reaction mixtures and obtaining pure targeted products with minimal involvement of purification steps. Most of the heterogeneous catalysts are prepared based on inorganic carriers such as silica and mesoporous silica [3,4,5]. However, for effective designation of the heterogeneous catalyst, integrating nanomaterials are getting significant interest due to their unique physicochemical properties, high surface to volume ratio, highly active surface of atoms and large-scale application along with imaging, photonics, nanoelectronics, sensors, biomaterials and biomedicine [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Nanomaterials based heterogeneous catalysts have the benefit regarding recovery and reuse in green chemical synthesis processes. However, magnetic nanomaterials-based heterogeneous catalysts are superior over the other nanomaterials-based heterogeneous catalysts because of the us of external magnet rather than centrifuge or suction filtration or gravitational filtration for the separation of catalyst from the reaction mixture. One of the most applicable magnetic nanomaterials is Fe3O4 because of its fundamental properties and wide application in various area of research such as medicine, sensors, high density magnetic recording media and catalysis [12,13]. An increased demand of using Fe3O4 in heterogeneous catalyst design has been prompted mainly due to its easy separation and recycling capability. The magnetic recovering property of Fe3O4 has been integrated in different catalytic systems [14,15,16]. Recently, Shokouheimehr et al, reported magnetic nanomaterials based heterogeneous catalysts for different types of organic transformations such as reduction of aromatic nitro compounds, Suzuki-coupling, acetylation of phenols and tandem reactions [17,18,19,20,21,22]. However, Fe3O4 impregnated catalysts have been treated with different coating materials for increasing their biocompatibility and stability. Especially, the surface of Fe3O4 has been modified via introducing appropriate functionalizing agents or linkers. This strategy provides a scope for bringing additional functionalities to the surface of Fe3O4 such as introducing organic ligands or metal complexes parallel to displaying excellent thermal and chemical stability [23].
Amongst a plethora of functionalizing agents, biopolymers have been employed in many heterogeneous catalytic systems [24,25,26,27]. Using chitosan (CS) as catalyst support is very promising due to its low cost, non-toxicity and environmentally benign nature [28]. CS is a byproduct waste produced by the fishing industry and is the second most abundant structural polysaccharide after cellulose [29]. The wide use of the CS as catalyst support is mainly due to the presence of free primary and secondary hydroxyl as well as amine functional groups on its surface. This property opens up potential functionalization of the CS surface through activation of both electrophiles and nucleophiles via hydrogen bonding and lone pair interactions [30]. One of the easy and convenient modification of CS surface is the esterification of the amine functional group by direct reaction with carboxylic acid through the formation of amide functional group.
Every year around the world, a vast amount of organic waste is produced from the aromatic nitro compounds and their derivatives due to their wide application in the production of pesticides, herbicides, insecticides and synthetic dyes [31]. Among the aromatic nitro compounds, the nitrophenols are the most frequently found pollutants in industrial effluent. They have a huge adverse effect on the environment due to their difficult degradation process and are carcinogenic to living begins [32].
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA) has rated nitrophenols as priority pollutants because of their perilous nature and recommended low concentration (10.0 ng/mL) in natural water bodies [33]. Therefore, catalytic reduction of nitrophenols is very important for pollution remediation. The reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP is one of the model reduction processes among nitrophenols derivatives that has attracted special attention in both academia and industrial research [34]. Noble metals such as Au, Ag, Pt and Pd are the active ingredients of the catalysts impregnated in their nanoforms which play a significant role in the catalytic reduction of 4-NP [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. Compared to Au, Pt and Pd, using Ag in the design of environmentally benign heterogeneous catalysts is more convenient to address various economic and environmental issues [50,51,52,53,54,55]. For instance, Ag-deposited-on-silica coated magnetic Fe3O4 catalysts were used for the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP [56,57] where silica was used as supportive matrix which helps in the dispersion of Ag nanoparticles during the catalysis process. However, the problem of using silica as catalyst support is the fragility in harsh acidic and alkaline media. On the other hand, CS shows the robustness compared to silica in these media. Recently, Xu et al. reported a Ag-decorated magnetic CS catalyst for the catalytic conversion of 4-NP to 4-AP where CS surface was modified using tween-80 as emulsifier and span-80 as surfactant and glutaraldehyde (GLA) as cross linker [58]. Despite this interest, no one to the best of our knowledge has reported the use of magnetic chitosan (Fe3O4@CS) as a heterogeneous catalyst for the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP.
Herein, we successfully developed CS coated Fe3O4 (Fe3O4@CS) as a heterogeneous catalyst for the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP using NaBH4 solution. The surface of magnetic chitosan was modified by the reaction of the amine functional group of chitosan with methyl salicylate (Fe3O4@CS@MS). A variety of cleating molecules such as proline, amylase, glucoamylase, lipase, emulsifier, cross-linker and different aldehydes have been used for the modification of magnetic chitosan’s surface so far [58,59,60,61,62]. However, we found methyl salicylate is more convenient compared to other chelating molecules or agent as it is cheap, non-toxic and extracted from many naturally available plants specially from wintergreens. Moreover, it is readily available even in most chemistry laboratories as common reagent. Then, magnetic chitosan was further modified by depositing silver nanoparticles on its surface to get our target heterogeneous catalyst (Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag). All of these composite materials were investigated for the reduction of 4-NP. The sustainability of the catalyst was evaluated by separation of the catalyst with external magnet and reused in repeating catalytic cycles for the reduction of 4-NP under optimal conditions.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization

In the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum of the Fe3O4 (a), the characteristic stretching vibration of Fe-O has been observed at 545 cm−1. This vibration was observed in all other spectra such as Fe3O4@CS (c), Fe3O4@CS@MS (d) and Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag (e) except CS (b) indicating that all the prepared materials contain Fe3O4 (Figure 1). The C-O stretching vibration band of the CS (b) was observed at 1374 cm−1 corresponding to the primary alcoholic group of the CS which was shifted to 1384 cm−1 in magnetic chitosan Fe3O4@CS (Figure 1c), indicating the coating Fe3O4 with CS. The N-H bending vibration of CS (b) at 1644 cm−1 shifted in magnetic CS (c) to 1640 cm−1 and at surface modified magnetic CS (d) to 1636 cm−1, respectively. Meanwhile, a broad peak around 3345 cm−1 was attributed to -OH and -NH2 stretching vibrations. The surface modified magnetic CS with methyl salicylate Fe3O4@CS@MS (d) exhibits an absorption band at 1733 cm−1 which indicates the presence of carbonyl (C=O) group in the amide function moiety of the materials. No remarkable change was observed in the FTIR spectrum of the Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag (e) after succeessful depostion of silver nanoparticles on the magnetic CS surface. This results imply that the silver nanoparticles have been deposited effectively on the modified magnetic CS surface via non chemical interaction.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was measured for all the prepared composite materials. It confirms the stepwise formation of the chitosan decorated Fe3O4, surface modified magnetic chitosan and deposition of silver nanoparticles on the magnetic chitosan surface. It also allows the determination of the stability, ratio of ingredients and organic moieties present in the composite materials. TGA plots for Fe3O4 (a), CS (b), Fe3O4@CS (c), Fe3O4@CS@MS (d) and Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag (e) were recorded between 30 °C and 800 °C as shown in Figure 2 and evaluated by mass loss as a function of temperature. All the plots except Fe3O4 (a) resemble of pseudo-two step thermal decomposition. The first step of the thermal decomposition corresponds to the removal of physically absorbed water, and the second step is for the main mass loss related to the removing of organic moieties from the embedded chitosan part of the composite materials. The total mass losses for Fe3O4 (a), CS (b), Fe3O4@CS (c), Fe3O4@CS@MS (d) and Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag (e) were 2.0%, 100.0%, 53.9%, 55.5% and 46.5%, respectively. These results showed a good agreement with theoretical calculation. For instance, Fe3O4 lost only 2% mass which was mainly due to the small amount of moisture present in the sample whereas CS lost 100% mass for its organic nature. The CS decorated Fe3O4 (c) lost 53.9% which is more than pure Fe3O4 and less than pure CS which is line with the theoretical concept. The surface modified magnetic chitosan Fe3O4@CS@MS (d) lost 55.5% which is slightly higher than magnetic CS due to the added salicylate group to the amine functional group. Noticeably, silver-nanoparticles-deposited magnetic chitosan (Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag (e) mass loss is relatively less than other prepared materials except Fe3O4, which indicates successful anchoring of nanoparticles on the surface. The amount of silver deposited on composite materials is 9.0% which has been estimated from the difference between the mass loss of Fe3O4@CS@MS (d) and Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag (e), respectively. Furthermore, the amount of silver distributed on the magnetic CS surface is found 8.7% in the elemental composition of the catalyst (Figure S1 in ESI).
It confirms that silver nanoparticles have been deposited on the modified surface of magnetic CS successfully. After 575 °C, no significant mass loss was observed for all the prepared materials indicating the stability of the materials at higher temperature. In the literature, it has been reported that amine group can absorb and reduce the metal ion directly into corresponding metal nanoparticles [59,63]. Therefore, amide and hydroxyl functional groups of Fe3O4@CS@MS provide suitable space for depositing silver nanoparticles on the modified surface.
The phase and purity of the catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag (e, above) was examined by X-ray diffractometer (XRD) analysis. For comparison, XRD spectrum of Fe3O4@CS@MS (d) (Figure 3, below) shows diffraction peaks corresponding to 2θ = 30.0°, 35.4°, 42.5°, 53.5°, 56.8° and 63.0° respectively. These peaks are responsible for the magnetic Fe3O4 particles which is good fit with the literature reported result [57,64]. All of these peaks are present in our target catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag (e) indicating the existence of Fe3O4. The appearance of these peaks in both prepared composite materials confirms the coating of Fe3O4 with chitosan without any significant phase change. Moreover, chitosan did not destroy the crystal structure of Fe3O4. The face centered cubic structure of Fe3O4 in both Fe3O4@CS@MS and Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag was confirmed by the JCPDS card NO 75-1609 [65]. Two characteristic diffraction peaks at 2θ = 11.2°, 18.1° were observed for the effective coating of chitosan around the Fe3O4 crystal phase. The XRD pattern of both Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag (e, above) and Fe3O4@CS@MS (d, below) indicated the presence of chitosan in both materials without induction of phase change. Furthermore, four characteristic peaks were observed in the XRD pattern of the Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag (e, above) when 2θ = 37.9°, 44.1°, 64.3° and 77.3° respectively (Figure 3). The appearing of these peaks confirms the deposition of silver nanoparticles on the modified surface of the magnetic chitosan. These diffraction peaks are indexed to crystalline cubic phase of silver nanoparticles, which have a good agreement with the literature reported result [56]. However, few peaks at 2θ = 22.1°, 27.8°, 31.0°, 33.7° and 47.0° were observed in our prepared target catalyst indicating the presence of impurity. These peaks might be responsible for excessive use of AgNO3 during the deposition of silver nanoparticles on magnetic surface of the catalyst.
After preparation and characterization of Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag, the morphology of the surface of the catalyst was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For comparison, Figure 4a,b exhibits the particle size of Fe3O4 which is relatively large (around 63 nm) due to the tendency of aggregation of nanoparticles by dipole–dipole interaction. Figure 4c shows the morphology and particle size of silver nanoparticles that deposited on the surface of catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag before the catalytic reaction. SEM image of the catalyst also shown in Figure 4d after the fifth catalytic cycle reduction of 4-NP confirms the presence of silver nanoparticles on catalyst surface. In both cases, particles size ranged between 112 and 241 nm.
Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) result was obtained from the SEM analysis of Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag which clearly shows the presence of silver nanoparticles in the catalyst. Figure S1 (in ESI) shows the EDX spectrum of the catalyst.
The elemental composition of the catalyst was found to be 8.7%, 16.3%, 34.4.0% and 37.0% for Ag, C, O and Fe, respectively. This result indicates that Fe3O4 was successfully covered with the CS, and silver nanoparticles have been deposited on its modified surface. In addition to that, Figure 5 exhibits the elemental mapping of the catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag before catalytic reaction and shows that silver nanoparticles have been distributed uniformly in the catalyst texture. For comparison, elemental mapping of the catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag was also recorded after the fifth cycle of catalytic reaction (Figure 6). It clearly proves that no significant chemical change happened to the catalyst even after the fifth cycle of the reaction.

2.2. Reduction of the 4-Nitrophenol (4-NP)

The prepared materials Fe3O4@CS, Fe3O4@CS@MS and Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag were investigated for the catalytic reduction of the 4-NP to 4-AP in presence of aqueous NaBH4 solution. Reduction of 4-NP was chosen as model reaction as this is only one product and its formation is easy to detect by measuring the absorbance at around 300 and 400 nm. Initially, a stock solution (10.0 mg /L) of 4-NP was prepared in water, and the light-yellow aqueous solution of 4-NP showed an absorption (λmax) at 317 nm (Figure 7; Catalysts 09 00839 i001 violet color spectrum). When a freshly prepared NaBH4 solution was added to the 4-NP solution, immediately the color of the reaction mixture changed from light yellow to bright yellow, and the position of absorption maximum (λmax) shifted to 400 nm. This color change indicates the formation of nitrophenolate ions in presence of alkaline NaBH4 solution (Figure 7; Catalysts 09 00839 i002 black color spectrum). The absorption (λmax) remained unchanged over time (30 min) and even after adding an additional amount of NaBH4 solution. It clearly proves that reduction of 4-NP does not proceed by using only NaBH4 solution.
A control experiment was carried out by using the magnetic Fe3O4 on the aqueous solution of 4-NP and NaBH4 mixture. No remarkable change was observed in Ultraviolet-Visible (UV-Vis) absorptions measurement, indicating Fe3O4 itself cannot catalyze the reaction (Figure 7; Catalysts 09 00839 i003 red color spectrum). However, when silver nanoparticles deposited surface modified magnetic chitosan catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag (1.5 mg; 1.2 × 10−6 mol Ag) was added to the aqueous solution of 4-NP and NaBH4 mixture, immediately the color of the reaction mixture turned to very light yellow. This color change was estimated by UV-Vis absorption (Figure 7; Catalysts 09 00839 i004 blue color spectrum), indicating the appearance of a new peak at 320 nm for the formation of 4-AP.
After getting this result in hand, the chitosan coated Fe3O4 was employed in the target reaction as catalyst; it showed catalytic activity towards the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP, which is confirmed by the blue shift of absorption (λmax) from 400 nm to 320 nm (Figure 8; Catalysts 09 00839 i004 blue color spectrum). To the best of our knowledge, this is for the first-time the CS decorated Fe3O4 has shown catalytic activity for the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP. The experiment was repeated for three times and every time the same result was reproduced. We speculate the reduction occurred via electron relaying mechanism from the donor BH4 to the acceptor 4-NP while both have been adsorbed on the surface of the catalyst. Hydrogen atom generated from hydride by transferring electron to magnetic chitosan surface and then attacking the substrate 4-NP and reducing it to 4-AP. During the reduction process, as concertation of NaBH4 is relatively excessive compared to 4-NP, it has been considered that NaBH4 concentration remains constant. Then, the surface modified magnetic CS by methyl salicylate Fe3O4@CS@MS was examined for the catalytic reduction of 4-NP in the presence of NaBH4 solution (Figure 8; Catalysts 09 00839 i002 black color spectrum).
A slight improved catalytic efficiency was found, compared to the CS decorated magnetic Fe3O4@CS. Finally, silver nanoparticles deposited magnetic chitosan Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag was investigated for the same catalytic reaction under optimal conditions. It showed the best catalytic efficiency for reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP while Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag was used as catalyst among three prepared materials that were investigated (Figure 8; Catalysts 09 00839 i003 red color spectrum).
For further optimization for the catalyst loadings, we conducted the same catalytic reaction using different amount of catalysts such as Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag and Fe3O4@CS respectively. In first case, we used 0.8 mg (6.5 × 10−7 mol Ag) of Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag which is almost half of previous amount (1.5 mg; 1.2 ×10−6 mol Ag, in Figure 8) and later case we used 3.0 mg of Fe3O4@CS which is almost double of previous amount. In both cases, the absorption peak at 400 nm significantly decreases within 10 min and concomitant appearance of a new peak at 320 nm (Figure 9). It seems that silver nanoparticles deposited magnetic chitosan Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag is fourfold effective catalyst than the chitosan decorated Fe3O4@CS for the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP.
Time dependent progress of the catalytic reduction reaction was monitored by adding 0.8 mg (6.5 × 10−7 mol Ag) of Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag catalyst to 6.0 mL (10.0 mg/L) solution of 4-NP and 1.0 mL (1.0 mM) of freshly prepared NaBH4 solution, as shown in Figure 10. At the beginning of reaction (0 min), absorption occurred at 400 nm indicating the presence of 4-nitrophenole ions only in the reaction mixture. During the progress of reaction, the intensity of absorptions at 400 nm decreased and appeared a new peak at 320 nm. The new absorption peak at 320 nm indicated the formation of 4-AP via the effective reduction of 4-NP. The absorption peak at 400 nm significantly decreased within 5 min, and simultaneously, the intensity of the new peak at 320 nm increased. Within 10 min of the reaction, the peak at 400 nm corresponding to the 4-nitrophemnole almost disappeared, and the peak at 317 nm was the prominent for 4-AP. This observation has close resemblance with the literature reported results [57,58].
In the reaction media, the concentration of 4-NP is directly proportional to the absorbance. Therefore, the ratio of absorbance at time t (At) to that at t = 0 (A0) must be equal to the concentration ratio Ct/C0 of 4-NP. Figure 11 shows the relationship Ct/C0 versus time of the reaction and it was clearly observed that the reduction process follows the pseudo first order reaction kinetics. Furthermore, the appearance of an isosbestic point at 350 nm (Figure 10) is evident in one step reaction process. Most of the 4-NP converted to product 4-AP within 3 min of the reaction time and reaming conversion happened within 4–10 min of the progress of the reaction.
Recyclability and reusability of catalysts are two important parameters for designing sustainable and economically viable heterogeneous catalyst. Our silver nanoparticles deposited magnetic chitosan Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag was investigated for repeated experiments through the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP in presence of NaBH4 solution. As our catalyst was cored with strong magnet Fe3O4, it was rapidly and conveniently collected from the reaction system with the help of an external magnet after each catalytic cycle. Figure 12 shows that the catalyst was successfully recycled and rescued for five times with efficiency of about 90%. Therefore, our prepared catalyst is a highly active catalyst for the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP. That the activity of the catalyst gradually decreases might be due to the leaching of nanoparticles during washing of catalyst with water and ethanol.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Reagents and Materials

Ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O; 98%), ferrous sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4·7H2O; 99%), ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH; 30–33%), ethanol (EtOH; 96%), chitosan (low molecular weight), sodium sulfate (Na2SO4; 99%), methyl salicylate (2-(HO)C6H4CO2CH3; 99%), silver nitrate (AgNO3; 99.8%), sodium borohydride (NaBH4; 99%) and 4-nitrophenol (C6H4OHNO2; 99%) were purchased from Aldrich. All these chemicals were of analytical grade and used without any further purification. Double deionized water was used in all experimental procedures.

3.2. Synthesis of Magnetic Fe3O4

Magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles were synthesized with co-precipitation method adapting the literature procedure [66,67,68]. 6.0 g of FeCl3·6H2O and 4.1 g of FeSO4·7H2O were dissolved in 100.0 mL of deionized water, stirred and heated to 90 °C under nitrogen atmosphere for 20 min. 10.0 mL of 25% (m/v%) NH4OH was added and the reaction mixture was stirred with heating for additional 30 min. Then, the reaction was stopped and cooled to room temperature. Finally, a black substance was collected by centrifugation and washed with excess amount of water until it was reached to neutral pH at 7.0.

3.3. Coating of Fe3O4 with Chitosan (Fe3O4@CS)

In a 500.0 mL round bottom flask, 1.0 g of CS was suspended in 100.0 mL acetic acid (2% w/v) under vigorous stirring using a mechanic stirrer for 1 h. Then, 500.0 mg of Fe3O4 and sodium sulfate (20% w/v) were added to the CS slurry and was stirred for an extra hour. The magnetic CS was separated from the reaction mixture by an external permanent magnet and washed with ethanol (50.0 mL) and methanol (50.0 mL) for four times and finally dried under vacuum at 70 °C for 6 h.

3.4. Surface Modification of Magnetic Chitosan (Fe3O4@CS@MS)

The surface modification of magnetic CS was prepared by adding 1.5 g of Fe3O4@CS in 100.0 mL of ethanol following the literature procedure [69]. Then, the round bottom flask was charged with a condenser and mechanical stirrer following the addition of 6.5 mmol of methyl salicylate (MS) and refluxed for 24 h. The reaction mixture cooled down to room temperature and the surface modified magnetic chitosan (Fe3O4@CS@MS) was separated by external magnet and washed three times with ethanol (50.0 mL) and methanol (50.0 mL) to remove unreacted methyl salicylate. Finally, the product was dried in oven at 80 °C for 6 h.

3.5. Deposition of Silver Nanoparticles on Modified Magnetic Chitosan (Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag)

AgNO3 (4.3 mmol) was dissolved in 15.0 mL of ethanol and added to the suspension of Fe3O4@CS@MS (1.01 g in 20.0 mL of ethanol) and stirred at 60 °C for 18 h. The final product Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag as brown solid materials were separated with external magnet and washed with ethanol (3 × 10.0 mL) to remove unreacted materials and finally dried in open air and oven at 80 °C for 4h. The final product was stored for further uses.
Overall synthetic procedure for the fabrication of the of the catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag has been depicted in Scheme 1.

3.6. Catalytic Reaction

The reduction of 4-NP was investigated by using Fe3O4@CS, Fe3O4@CS@MS and Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag in the presence of reducing agent NaBH4 in quartz cuvettes, and the reaction progress was monitored by UV-Vis spectroscopy. In optimal reaction condition, 1.0 mL of freshly prepared 1.0 mM NaBH4 aqueous solution was added to 6.0 mL of (10.0 mg/L) 4-NP aqueous solution followed by the addition of 1.5 mg/0.8 mg of catalyst. Immediately after the addition of the catalyst, the reduction progress of reaction mixture was monitored by scanning UV-Vis spectra in the range 250–550 nm in every one-minute interval. The recyclability of the catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag was studied by separating the catalyst with external magnet and washed at least four times with ethanol and water and then used for next catalytic cycle.

3.7. Instrumentation

The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed using a thermo-balance instrument-type TGA-50, SHIMADZU, Japan. TGA analyses were performed in static air with a heating rate of 10 °C/ min. FTIR spectra were recorded using an FTIR Bruker Platinum Spectrometer (Germany) fitted with an attenuated total reflection (ATR) unit, with single reflection geometry. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained using Bruker D8 Advance powder X-ray diffractometer (Germany) with CuKα radiation source. Maximum voltage: 40 kV and maximum Current: 40 mA. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were recorded using TESCON VEGA3 (Brno-Kohoutovice, Czech Republic) XM variable pressure, accelerating voltage: max. 30k. For collecting SEM images, Sputter Coating System was used for preparing the sample. Quorum Technology Mini Sputter Coater, SC7620 (United Kingdom). Target: Gold/Palladium (80% & 20%); 57 mm Ø × 0.1mm thick, sputtering gas: argon, chamber pressure: 10−2 mbar, sputtering time: 120 s, plasma current: 18 mA, applied voltage: 1 kV, carbon fibre evaporation. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) was recorded using Oxford Instruments X-Max 50 EDS detector (LN2 free system). Resolution: 125 eV (United Kingdom). Ultraviolet-Visible (UV-Vis) absorbance was recorded using Spectrophotometer (UV–2510TS—Labomed, Los Angeles, CA, USA). The results were calculated from the averages of all sample readings and represented as Mean ± SD. Calculations were made using Excel 2016.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we successfully coated magnetic Fe3O4 with chitosan (CS). This magnetic chitosan Fe3O4@CS shows the catalytic efficiency for the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP in the presence of NaBH4 solution. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of using magnetic CS for the reduction of 4-NP. However, CS has great advantages in the modification of its surface by the reaction of amine functional group with safe and simple organic compound methyl salicylate to amide functional group which allows the support of metal interaction. We efficiently modified the surface of magnetic CS and deposited silver nanoparticles (Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag), which reduced 4-NP to 4-AP four times more effectively than magnetic chitosan (Fe3O4@CS). Noticeably, this investigation represents the first example of the application of the functionalization of magnetic CS surface with methyl salicylate for preparing a magnetically separable silver-nanoparticles-based heterogeneous catalyst. Furthermore, the catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag was separated with external magnet from the reaction mixture and reused five times with almost 90% efficiency to the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP. Finally, a practical and convenient heterogeneous catalyst has been developed from renewable resources and cheap materials.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/9/10/839/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization K.H.; methodology K.H.; formal analysis K.H.; investigation, K.H, N.D.A.-B.; resources, K.H., A.E.; data curation, K.H., I.A.S., A.E.; writing—original draft preparation, K.H.; writing—review and editing, K.H., I.A.S., A.E.; funding acquisition, K.H., I.A.S.

Funding

This work was supported by the University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates (UAE) [Competitive Research project No. 1902144082].

Acknowledgments

K. Hasan wishes to give a special thanks to the Advanced Materials Research Laboratory, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates (UAE) for help in running samples and access to equipment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chorkendroff, I.; Niemantsverdriet, J.W. Introduction to catalysis. Concepts Mod. Catal. Kinet. 2003, 1, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  2. Coperet, C.; Chabanas, M.; Saint-Arroman, R.P.; Basset, J.-M. Homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis: Bridging the gap through surface organometallic chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 156–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kim, A.; Rafiaei, S.M.; Abolhosseini, S.; Shokouhimehr, M. Palladium nanocatalysts confined in mesoporous silica for heterogeneous reduction of nitroaromatics. Energy Environ. Focus 2015, 4, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ahadi, A.; Rostamnia, S.; Panahi, P.; Wilson, L.D.; Kong, Q.; An, Z.; Shokouhimehr, M. Palladium comprising dicationic bipyridinium supported periodic mesoporous organosilica (PMO): Pd@Bipy-PMO as an efficient hybrid catalyst for suzuki-miyaura cross-coupling reaction in water. Catalysts 2019, 9, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, K.; Hong, K.; Suh, J.M.; Lee, T.H.; Kwon, O.; Shokouhimehr, M.; Jang, H.W. Facile synthesis of monodispersed Pd nanocatalysts decorated on graphene oxide for reduction of nitroaromatics in aqueous solution. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2019, 45, 599–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sanchez, C.; Belleville, P.; Popall, M.; Nicole, L. Applications of advanced hybrid organic-inorganic nanomaterials: From laboratory to market. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 696–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, D.; Du, X.; Shi, L.; Gao, R. Shape-controlled synthesis and catalytic application of ceria nanomaterials. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 14455–14475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jariwala, D.; Sangwan, V.K.; Lauhon, L.J.; Marks, T.J.; Hersam, M.C. Carbon nanomaterials for electronics, optoelectronics, photovoltaics, and sensing. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 2824–2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zaera, F. Nanostructured materials for applications in heterogeneous catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 2746–2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bartelmess, J.; Quinn, S.J.; Giordani, S. Carbon nanomaterials: Multi-functional agents for biomedical fluorescence and Raman imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 4672–4698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, W.; Jiang, C.; Roy, V.A.L. Recent progress in magnetic iron oxide-semiconductor composite nanomaterials as promising photocatalysts. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 38–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Laurent, S.; Forge, D.; Port, M.; Roch, A.; Robic, C.; Vander Elst, L.; Muller, R.N. Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Stabilization, Vectorization, Physicochemical Characterizations, and Biological Applications. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2064–2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shen, Y.F.; Tang, J.; Nie, Z.H.; Wang, Y.D.; Ren, Y.; Zuo, L. Preparation and application of magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles for wastewater purification. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 68, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shen, C.-R.; Wu, S.-T.; Tsai, Z.-T.; Wang, J.-J.; Yen, T.-C.; Tsai, J.-S.; Shih, M.-F.; Liu, C.-L. Characterization of quaternized chitosan-stabilized iron oxide nanoparticles as a novel potential magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent for cell tracking. Polym. Int. 2011, 60, 945–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, Y.; Ma, F.; Su, X.; Sun, C.; Liu, J.; Sun, Z.; Hou, Y. Synthesis and catalysis of oleic acid-coated Fe3O4 nanocrystals for direct coal liquefaction. Catal. Commun. 2012, 26, 231–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mojtahedi, M.M.; Abaee, M.S.; Rajabi, A.; Mahmoodi, P.; Bagherpoor, S. Recyclable superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles for efficient catalysis of thiolysis of epoxides. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2012, 361, 68–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Choi, K.-H.; Shokouhimehr, M.; Sung, Y.-E. Heterogeneous Suzuki cross-coupling reaction catalyzed by magnetically recyclable nanocatalyst. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2013, 34, 1477–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jun, S.W.; Shokouhimehr, M.; Lee, D.J.; Jang, Y.; Park, J.; Hyeon, T. One-pot synthesis of magnetically recyclable mesoporous silica supported acid-base catalysts for tandem reactions. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 7821–7823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shokouhimehr, M.; Lee, J.E.; Han, S.I.; Hyeon, T. Magnetically recyclable hollow nanocomposite catalysts for heterogeneous reduction of nitroarenes and Suzuki reactions. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 4779–4781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rafiaei, S.M.; Kim, A.; Shokouhimehr, M. Gadolinium triflate immobilized on magnetic nanocomposites as recyclable Lewis acid catalyst for acetylation of phenols. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 2014, 6, 309–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shokouhimehr, M. Magnetically separable and sustainable nanostructured catalysts for heterogeneous reduction of nitroaromatics. Catalysts 2015, 5, 534–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shokouhimehr, M.; Hong, K.; Lee, T.H.; Moon, C.W.; Hong, S.P.; Zhang, K.; Suh, J.M.; Choi, K.S.; Varma, R.S.; Jang, H.W. Magnetically retrievable nanocomposite adorned with Pd nanocatalysts: Efficient reduction of nitroaromatics in aqueous media. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 3809–3817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wu, W.; He, Q.; Jiang, C. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis and surface functionalization strategies. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2008, 3, 397–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Huang, Q.Z.; Wang, S.M.; Huang, J.F.; Zhuo, L.H.; Guo, Y.C. Study on the heterogeneous degradation of chitosan with hydrogen peroxide under the catalysis of phosphotungstic acid. Carbohydr. Polym. 2007, 68, 761–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shaabani, A.; Maleki, A. Cellulose sulfuric acid as a bio-supported and recyclable solid acid catalyst for the one-pot three-component synthesis of α-amino nitriles. Appl. Catal. A 2007, 331, 149–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Leonhardt, S.E.S.; Stolle, A.; Ondruschka, B.; Cravotto, G.; De Leo, C.; Jandt, K.D.; Keller, T.F. Chitosan as a support for heterogeneous Pd catalysts in liquid phase catalysis. Appl. Catal. A 2010, 379, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wei, D.; Ye, Y.; Jia, X.; Yuan, C.; Qian, W. Chitosan as an active support for assembly of metal nanoparticles and application of the resultant bioconjugates in catalysis. Carbohydr. Res. 2010, 345, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Islam, S.M.; Mondal, S.; Mondal, P.; Roy, A.S.; Tuhina, K.; Salam, N.; Mobarak, M. A reusable polymer supported copper catalyst for the C-N and C-O bond cross-coupling reaction of aryl halides as well as arylboronic acids. J. Organomet. Chem. 2012, 696, 4264–4274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Reddy, K.R.; Rajgopal, K.; Maheswari, C.U.; Kantam, M.L. Chitosan hydrogel: A green and recyclable biopolymer catalyst for aldol and Knoevenagel reactions. New J. Chem. 2006, 30, 1549–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dekamin, M.G.; Azimoshan, M.; Ramezani, L. Chitosan: A highly efficient renewable and recoverable bio-polymer catalyst for the expeditious synthesis of α-amino nitriles and imines under mild conditions. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 811–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Panigrahi, S.; Basu, S.; Praharaj, S.; Pande, S.; Jana, S.; Pal, A.; Ghosh, S.K.; Pal, T. Synthesis and size-selective catalysis by supported gold nanoparticles: Study on heterogeneous and homogeneous catalytic process. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 4596–4605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Spain, J.C. Biodegradation OF nitroaromatic compounds. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1995, 49, 523–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shen, J.; He, R.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Zuo, Y.; Li, Y.; Sun, X.; Li, J.; Han, W. Biodegradation kinetics of picric acid by Rhodococcus sp.NJUST16 in batch reactors. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 167, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Vaidya, M.J.; Kulkarni, S.M.; Chaudhari, R.V. Synthesis of p-Aminophenol by Catalytic Hydrogenation of p-Nitrophenol. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2003, 7, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chang, G.; Luo, Y.; Qin, X.; Lu, W.; Asiri, A.M.; Al-Youbi, A.O.; Sun, X. Synthesis of Pt nanoparticles decorated 1,5-diaminoanthraquinone nanofibers and their application toward catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2012, 12, 7075–7080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nemanashi, M.; Meijboom, R. Synthesis and characterization of Cu, Ag and Au dendrimer-encapsulated nanoparticles and their application in the reduction of 4-nitrophenol to 4-aminophenol. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 389, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wu, T.; Zhang, L.; Gao, J.; Liu, Y.; Gao, C.; Yan, J. Fabrication of graphene oxide decorated with Au-Ag alloy nanoparticles and its superior catalytic performance for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 7384–7390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, X.; Fu, J.; Wang, M.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J.; Xu, Q. Facile synthesis of Au nanoparticles supported on polyphosphazene functionalized carbon nanotubes for catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49, 5056–5065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Qin, Q.-H.; Na, H.; Zhang, C.; Yu, Q.; Zhang, X.-Q.; Zhang, H.-X. Preparation of Au nanoparticles immobilized cross-linked poly(4-vinylpyridine) nanofibers and their catalytic application for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2015, 15, 3909–3912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tamuly, C.; Hazarika, M.; Bordoloi, M. Biosynthesis of Au and Ag-Au bimetallic nanoparticles by pedicellamide for catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J. Bionanosci. 2015, 9, 460–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, S.; Zhang, J.; Yuan, P.; Sun, Q.; Jia, Y.; Yan, W.; Chen, Z.; Xu, Q. Au nanoparticle decorated N-containing polymer spheres: Additive-free synthesis and remarkable catalytic behavior for reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 50, 1323–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Su, C.; Zhao, S.; Wang, P.; Chang, W.; Chang, K.; Zhang, H. Synthesis and characterization of ultrafined palladium nanoparticles decorated on 2D magnetic graphene oxide nanosheets and their application for catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 3433–3440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dong, W.; Cheng, S.; Feng, C.; Shang, N.; Gao, S.; Wang, C. Fabrication of highly dispersed Pd nanoparticles supported on reduced graphene oxide for catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol. Catal. Commun. 2017, 90, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sun, L.; Sun, X.; Zheng, Y.; Lin, Q.; Su, H.; Wang, Y.; Qi, C. Preparation and characterization of core-shell polystyrene/polyaniline/Pd composites and their catalytic properties for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Berahim, N.; Basirun, W.J.; Leo, B.F.; Johan, M.R. Synthesis of bimetallic gold-silver (Au-Ag) nanoparticles for the catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol to 4-aminophenol. Catalysts 2018, 8, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fu, J.; Wang, S.; Zhu, J.; Wang, K.; Gao, M.; Wang, X.; Xu, Q. Au-Ag bimetallic nanoparticles decorated multi-amino cyclophosphazene hybrid microspheres as enhanced activity catalysts for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018, 207, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rocha, M.; Costa, P.; Sousa, C.A.D.; Pereira, C.; Rodriguez-Borges, J.E.; Freire, C. L-serine-functionalized montmorillonite decorated with Au nanoparticles: A new highly efficient catalyst for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J. Catal. 2018, 361, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yazdankhah, M.; Veisi, H.; Hemmati, S. In situ immobilized palladium nanoparticles (Pd NPs) on fritillaria imperialis flower extract-modified graphene and their catalytic activity for reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2018, 91, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lv, Z.-S.; Zhu, X.-Y.; Meng, H.-B.; Feng, J.-J.; Wang, A.-J. One-pot synthesis of highly branched Pt@Ag core-shell nanoparticles as a recyclable catalyst with dramatically boosting the catalytic performance for 4-nitrophenol reduction. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 538, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shin, K.S.; Choi, J.-Y.; Park, C.S.; Jang, H.J.; Kim, K. Facile synthesis and catalytic application of silver-deposited magnetic nanoparticles. Catal. Lett. 2009, 133, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ai, L.; Yue, H.; Jiang, J. Environmentally friendly light-driven synthesis of Ag nanoparticles in situ grown on magnetically separable biohydrogels as highly active and recyclable catalysts for 4-nitrophenol reduction. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 23447–23453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hsu, K.-C.; Chen, D.-H. Green synthesis and synergistic catalytic effect ofAg/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Safari, J.; Zarnegar, Z.; Sadeghi, M.; Enayati-Najafabadi, A. Dendritic macromolecules supported Ag nanoparticles as efficient catalyst for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J. Mol. Struct. 2016, 1125, 772–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Torkamani, F.; Azizian, S. Green and simple synthesis of Ag nanoparticles loaded onto cellulosic fiber as efficient and low-cost catalyst for reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 214, 270–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Veisi, H.; Kazemi, S.; Mohammadi, P.; Safarimehr, P.; Hemmati, S. Catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol over Ag nanoparticles immobilized on Stachys lavandulifolia extract-modified multi walled carbon nanotubes. Polyhedron 2019, 157, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Naik, B.; Hazra, S.; Prasad, V.S.; Ghosh, N.N. Synthesis of Ag nanoparticles within the pores of SBA-15: An efficient catalyst for reduction of 4-nitrophenol. Catal. Commun. 2011, 12, 1104–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Du, X.; He, J.; Zhu, J.; Sun, L.; An, S. Ag-deposited silica-coated Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles catalyzed reduction of p-nitrophenol. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 2717–2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xu, P.; Liang, X.; Chen, N.; Tang, J.; Shao, W.; Gao, Q.; Teng, Z. Magnetic separable chitosan microcapsules decorated with silver nanoparticles for catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 507, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, J.; Zhao, G.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Hou, P. Reversible immobilization of glucoamylase onto magnetic chitosan nanocarriers. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 681–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hajipour, A.R.; Boostani, E.; Mohammadsaleh, F. Proline-functionalized chitosan–palladium(ii) complex, a novel nanocatalyst for C–C bond formation in water. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 24742–24748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Naghipour, A.; Fakhri, A. Heterogeneous Fe3O4@chitosan-Schiff base Pd nanocatalyst: Fabrication, characterization and application as highly efficient and magnetically-recoverable catalyst for Suzuki–Miyaura and Heck–Mizoroki C–C coupling reactions. Catal. Commun. 2016, 73, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Antony, R.; Arun, T.; Manickam, S.T.D. A review on applications of chitosan-based Schiff bases. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 129, 615–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sun, Z.; Li, H.; Cui, G.; Tian, Y.; Yan, S. Multifunctional magnetic core-shell dendritic mesoporous silica nanospheres decorated with tiny Ag nanoparticles as a highly active heterogeneous catalyst. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 360, 252–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Safari, J.; Javadian, L. Chitosan decorated Fe3O4 nanoparticles as a magnetic catalyst in the synthesis of phenytoin derivatives. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 48973–48979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Deng, H.; Li, X.; Peng, Q.; Wang, X.; Chen, J.; Li, Y. Monodisperse magnetic single-crystal ferrite microspheres. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2782–2785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rahimi, R.; Kerdari, H.; Rabbani, M.; Shafiee, M. Synthesis, characterization and adsorbing properties of hollow Zn-Fe2O4 nanospheres on removal of Congo red from aqueous solution. Desalination 2011, 28, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Peng, L.; Qin, P.; Lei, M.; Zeng, Q.; Song, H.; Yang, J.; Shao, J.; Liao, B.; Gu, J. Modifying Fe3O4 nanoparticles with humic acid for removal of Rhodamine B in water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 209, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, H.-B.; Zhang, Y.-H.; Zhang, Y.-B.; Zhang, F.-W.; Niu, J.-R.; Yang, H.-L.; Li, R.; Ma, J.-T. Pd immobilized on thiol-modified magnetic nanoparticles: A complete magnetically recoverable and highly active catalyst for hydrogenation reactions. Solid State Sci. 2012, 14, 1256–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hajipour, A.R.; Rezaei, F.; Khorsandi, Z. Pd/Cu-free Heck and Sonogashira cross-coupling reaction by Co nanoparticles immobilized on magnetic chitosan as reusable catalyst. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 1353–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Synthetic procedure for the fabrication of the catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag following the reaction conditions (a) solvent H2O, heating 90 °C for 30 min, NH3 (25%; m/v); (b) CH3COOH (2%; w/v), Na2SO4 (20%; w/v), stirred at RT; (c) EtOH, methyl salicylate, reflux for 24 h and (d) EtOH, AgNO3 (aq), stirred at 60 °C for 18 h.
Scheme 1. Synthetic procedure for the fabrication of the catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag following the reaction conditions (a) solvent H2O, heating 90 °C for 30 min, NH3 (25%; m/v); (b) CH3COOH (2%; w/v), Na2SO4 (20%; w/v), stirred at RT; (c) EtOH, methyl salicylate, reflux for 24 h and (d) EtOH, AgNO3 (aq), stirred at 60 °C for 18 h.
Catalysts 09 00839 sch001
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of (a) Fe3O4; (b) CS; (c) Fe3O4@CS; (d) Fe3O4@CS@MS and (e) Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag.
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of (a) Fe3O4; (b) CS; (c) Fe3O4@CS; (d) Fe3O4@CS@MS and (e) Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag.
Catalysts 09 00839 g001
Figure 2. TGA thermogram of (a) Fe3O4; (b) CS; (c) Fe3O4@CS; (d) Fe3O4@CS@MS and (e) Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag.
Figure 2. TGA thermogram of (a) Fe3O4; (b) CS; (c) Fe3O4@CS; (d) Fe3O4@CS@MS and (e) Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag.
Catalysts 09 00839 g002
Figure 3. XRD pattern of Fe3O4@CS@MS (d, below) and Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag (e, above).
Figure 3. XRD pattern of Fe3O4@CS@MS (d, below) and Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag (e, above).
Catalysts 09 00839 g003
Figure 4. SEM images of (a) Fe3O4; (b) Fe3O4 in different magnification; (c) catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag before the reaction and (d) catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag after fifth catalytic cycle of the reaction.
Figure 4. SEM images of (a) Fe3O4; (b) Fe3O4 in different magnification; (c) catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag before the reaction and (d) catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag after fifth catalytic cycle of the reaction.
Catalysts 09 00839 g004
Figure 5. Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) mapping of the catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag before the catalytic reaction.
Figure 5. Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) mapping of the catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag before the catalytic reaction.
Catalysts 09 00839 g005
Figure 6. Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) mapping of the catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag after fifth catalytic cycle of the catalytic reaction.
Figure 6. Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) mapping of the catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag after fifth catalytic cycle of the catalytic reaction.
Catalysts 09 00839 g006
Figure 7. Optimization of catalytic reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP monitored by UV-Vis spectra of 4-NP only ( Catalysts 09 00839 i001 violet line), in presence of NaBH4 ( Catalysts 09 00839 i002 black line), NaBH4 with Fe3O4 ( Catalysts 09 00839 i003 red line) and NaBH4 with 1.5 mg (1.2 × 10−6 mol Ag) of catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag ( Catalysts 09 00839 i004 blue line).
Figure 7. Optimization of catalytic reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP monitored by UV-Vis spectra of 4-NP only ( Catalysts 09 00839 i001 violet line), in presence of NaBH4 ( Catalysts 09 00839 i002 black line), NaBH4 with Fe3O4 ( Catalysts 09 00839 i003 red line) and NaBH4 with 1.5 mg (1.2 × 10−6 mol Ag) of catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag ( Catalysts 09 00839 i004 blue line).
Catalysts 09 00839 g007
Figure 8. UV-Vis spectra for the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP using 1.5 mg of each Fe3O4@CS ( Catalysts 09 00839 i004 blue line), Fe3O4@CS@MS ( Catalysts 09 00839 i002 black line) and Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag (1.2 × 10−6 mol Ag) ( Catalysts 09 00839 i003 red line) after 10 min.
Figure 8. UV-Vis spectra for the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP using 1.5 mg of each Fe3O4@CS ( Catalysts 09 00839 i004 blue line), Fe3O4@CS@MS ( Catalysts 09 00839 i002 black line) and Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag (1.2 × 10−6 mol Ag) ( Catalysts 09 00839 i003 red line) after 10 min.
Catalysts 09 00839 g008
Figure 9. UV-Vis spectra for the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP using 3.0 mg of Fe3O4@CS ( Catalysts 09 00839 i004 blue line) and 0.8 mg (6.5 × 10−7 mol Ag) of Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag ( Catalysts 09 00839 i003 red line) after 10 min.
Figure 9. UV-Vis spectra for the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP using 3.0 mg of Fe3O4@CS ( Catalysts 09 00839 i004 blue line) and 0.8 mg (6.5 × 10−7 mol Ag) of Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag ( Catalysts 09 00839 i003 red line) after 10 min.
Catalysts 09 00839 g009
Figure 10. Monitoring the progress for the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP using 0.8 mg (6.5 × 10−7 mol Ag) of Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag as catalyst.
Figure 10. Monitoring the progress for the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP using 0.8 mg (6.5 × 10−7 mol Ag) of Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag as catalyst.
Catalysts 09 00839 g010
Figure 11. Relationship of Ct/C0 versus time for the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP using 0.8 mg (6.5 × 10−7 mol Ag) of Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag as catalyst.
Figure 11. Relationship of Ct/C0 versus time for the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP using 0.8 mg (6.5 × 10−7 mol Ag) of Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag as catalyst.
Catalysts 09 00839 g011
Figure 12. Recycling efficiency of the catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag for the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP.
Figure 12. Recycling efficiency of the catalyst Fe3O4@CS@MS@Ag for the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP.
Catalysts 09 00839 g012

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hasan, K.; Shehadi, I.A.; Al-Bab, N.D.; Elgamouz, A. Magnetic Chitosan-Supported Silver Nanoparticles: A Heterogeneous Catalyst for the Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol. Catalysts 2019, 9, 839. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9100839

AMA Style

Hasan K, Shehadi IA, Al-Bab ND, Elgamouz A. Magnetic Chitosan-Supported Silver Nanoparticles: A Heterogeneous Catalyst for the Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol. Catalysts. 2019; 9(10):839. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9100839

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hasan, Kamrul, Ihsan Ahmed Shehadi, Nemat Dek Al-Bab, and Abdelaziz Elgamouz. 2019. "Magnetic Chitosan-Supported Silver Nanoparticles: A Heterogeneous Catalyst for the Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol" Catalysts 9, no. 10: 839. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9100839

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop