Next Article in Journal
Controlling Active Site Loop Dynamics in the (β/α)8 Barrel Enzyme Indole-3-Glycerol Phosphate Synthase
Previous Article in Journal
Highly Efficient One-Pot Synthesis of 2,4-Disubstituted Thiazoles Using Au(I) Catalyzed Oxidation System at Room Temperature
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Progress on MOF-Derived Nanomaterials as Advanced Electrocatalysts in Fuel Cells
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Carbon-Based Air-Breathing Cathodes for Microbial Fuel Cells

1
Bristol BioEnergy Centre, Bristol Robotics Laboratory, University of the West of England, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK
2
Center for Micro-Engineered Materials (CMEM), Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
3
School of Life Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Frederic Jaouen and Keith Hohn
Catalysts 2016, 6(9), 127; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal6090127
Received: 21 June 2016 / Revised: 10 August 2016 / Accepted: 19 August 2016 / Published: 24 August 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon Materials for Green Catalysis)
A comparison between different carbon-based gas-diffusion air-breathing cathodes for microbial fuel cells (MFCs) is presented in this work. A micro-porous layer (MPL) based on carbon black (CB) and an activated carbon (AC) layer were used as catalysts and applied on different supporting materials, including carbon cloth (CC), carbon felt (CF), and stainless steel (SS) forming cathode electrodes for MFCs treating urine. Rotating ring disk electrode (RRDE) analyses were done on CB and AC to: (i) understand the kinetics of the carbonaceous catalysts; (ii) evaluate the hydrogen peroxide production; and (iii) estimate the electron transfer. CB and AC were then used to fabricate electrodes. Half-cell electrochemical analysis, as well as MFCs continuous power performance, have been monitored. Generally, the current generated was higher from the MFCs with AC electrodes compared to the MPL electrodes, showing an increase between 34% and 61% in power with the AC layer comparing to the MPL. When the MPL was used, the supporting material showed a slight effect in the power performance, being that the CF is more powerful than the CC and the SS. These differences also agree with the electrochemical analysis performed. However, the different supporting materials showed a bigger effect in the power density when the AC layer was used, being the SS the most efficient, with a power generation of 65.6 mW·m−2, followed by the CC (54 mW·m−2) and the CF (44 mW·m−2). View Full-Text
Keywords: air-breathing cathode; carbon electrodes; microbial fuel cells; oxygen reduction reaction air-breathing cathode; carbon electrodes; microbial fuel cells; oxygen reduction reaction
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Merino-Jimenez, I.; Santoro, C.; Rojas-Carbonell, S.; Greenman, J.; Ieropoulos, I.; Atanassov, P. Carbon-Based Air-Breathing Cathodes for Microbial Fuel Cells. Catalysts 2016, 6, 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal6090127

AMA Style

Merino-Jimenez I, Santoro C, Rojas-Carbonell S, Greenman J, Ieropoulos I, Atanassov P. Carbon-Based Air-Breathing Cathodes for Microbial Fuel Cells. Catalysts. 2016; 6(9):127. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal6090127

Chicago/Turabian Style

Merino-Jimenez, Irene; Santoro, Carlo; Rojas-Carbonell, Santiago; Greenman, John; Ieropoulos, Ioannis; Atanassov, Plamen. 2016. "Carbon-Based Air-Breathing Cathodes for Microbial Fuel Cells" Catalysts 6, no. 9: 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal6090127

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop