Next Article in Journal
Preparation for Pt-Loaded Zeolite Catalysts Using w/o Microemulsion and Their Hydrocracking Behaviors on Fischer-Tropsch Product
Next Article in Special Issue
Selective Oxidation of Raw Glycerol Using Supported AuPd Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Ce and Zr Addition to Ni/SiO2 Catalysts for Hydrogen Production through Ethanol Steam Reforming
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis on Multicomponent Catalysts: What Can We Learn from Computer Simulations?
 
 
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Supported Photocatalyst for Removal of Emerging Contaminants from Wastewater in a Continuous Packed-Bed Photoreactor Configuration

1
Chemical Engineering Department, University of La Laguna, Avda. Astrofísico Fco. Sánchez s/n, La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Island 38200, Spain
2
Inorganic Chemistry Department, University of La Laguna, Avda. Astrofísico Fco. Sánchez s/n, La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Island 38200, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2015, 5(1), 77-87; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal5010077
Received: 4 November 2014 / Revised: 6 January 2015 / Accepted: 15 January 2015 / Published: 2 February 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers to Celebrate the Landmarks of Catalysts)

Abstract

:
Water pollution from emerging contaminants (ECs) or emerging pollutants is an important environmental problem. Heterogeneous photocatalytic treatment, as advanced oxidation treatment of wastewater effluents, has been proposed to solve this problem. In this paper, a heterogeneous photocatalytic process was studied for emergent contaminants removal using paracetamol as a model contaminant molecule. TiO2 photocatalytic activity was evaluated using two photocatalytic reactor configurations: Photocatalyst solid suspension in wastewater in a stirred photoreactor and TiO2 supported on glass spheres (TGS) configuring a packed bed photoreactor. The surface morphology and texture of the TGS were monitored by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The influence of photocatalyst amount and wastewater pH were evaluated in the stirred photoreactor and the influence of wastewater flowrate was tested in the packed bed photoreactor, in order to obtain the optimal operation conditions. Moreover, results obtained were compared with those obtained from photolysis and adsorption studies, using the optimal operation conditions. Good photocatalytic activities have been observed and leads to the conclusion that the heterogeneous photocatalytic system in a packed bed is an effective method for removal of emerging pollutants.

1. Introduction

In recent years, one of the most important aspects of environmental research has been the water pollution from emerging contaminants (ECs) such as endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs). Even they can be usually found in wastewater only at trace levels; their presence in aquatic environments raises the issue of their potential effects on human health and the environment [1,2,3]. Some adverse potential effects caused by ECs are aquatic toxicity, resistance development in pathogenic bacteria, genotoxicity and endocrine disruption [4,5,6].
Wastewater treatment plants are designed to remove conventional pollutants, such as suspended solids and biodegradable organic compounds, but they are not designed to remove low concentrations of synthetic pollutants, such as pharmaceuticals. These synthetic pollutants are resistant to conventional wastewater treatments. Advanced oxidation processes are treatments that are considered to be effective at removing EDCs from wastewater effluents. Advanced Oxidation Technology (AOT) has been examined to solve this environmental problem [7,8].
AOT has provided innovative, highly cost-effective and catalyzed chemical oxidation processes for treatment of contaminated soil, sludge and wastewater. AOT can be broadly defined as aqueous phase oxidation methods based primarily on the intermediacy of hydroxyl radicals, HO, in the mechanism leading to the destruction of the pollutant compounds [9,10,11]. The hydroxyl radical can be generated photochemically and it has high effectiveness for the oxidation of organic matter [12,13].
Heterogeneous photocatalytic process is one of the most important AOTs and it is based on the oxidation of polluting compounds which can be found in air or water by means of a reaction occurring on a semiconductor catalytic surface activated by light with a specific wavelength.
TiO2 is the most investigated semiconductor catalyst particularly because it has great potential in solving environmental pollution [14] and it is chemically stable, non-toxic and inexpensive [15,16,17]. However, TiO2 has an important disadvantage because it is in powder form and, therefore, a post-treatment separation stage is needed for its use as photocatalytic material in wastewater decontamination by photocatalytic treatment [18,19]. This is the main reason why it is very useful to test the possibility of supporting the TiO2 active phase on several materials—e.g., activated carbon, silica, glass and polymers—in order for it to be used as photocatalysts in photocatalytic reactors for wastewater decontamination [20,21,22].
In this study, commercial TiO2 (Degussa P25) supported on glass spheres was evaluated as photocatalyst in a packed bed photo reactor used to remove emergent contaminants in wastewater. Paracetamol has been used as emergent contaminant model molecule, which is a common analgesic and antipyretic drug, and it is heavily used all over the world and can be found in effluent of wastewater treatment plants [23].

2. Results and Discussion

TiO2 active phase was analyzed by XRD and its crystalline phases were obtained. Table 1 shows the percentage of anatase and rutile phase, observing that TiO2 Degussa P25 is composed mainly by the photocatalitically active anatase phase [24,25]. In addition, Table 1 presents the textural parameters of TiO2 Degussa P25, which were examined by N2 adsorption–desorption porosimetry and mercury porosimetry. The textural parameters included in this table are: BET specific area (ABET), total pore area (A), porosity (ε) and density (ρ).
Table 1. TiO2 Degussa P25 characterization.
Table 1. TiO2 Degussa P25 characterization.
XRDN2 adsorptionHg porosimetry
% Anatase% RutileABET (m2/g))A (m2/g)ε (%)ρbulk (g/mL)ρapparent (g/mL)
811951.163.792.460.192.58
Prior to the study of the photocatalytic process, experiments in the stirred photoreactor have been performed in order to quantify the photolytic effect of the UV light on the paracetamol degradation in wastewater (pH = 8) and the adsorption of the emergent contaminant molecules onto the TiO2 surface. Figure 1 shows the degree of paracetamol removal from wastewater by means of both phenomenon in the photoreactor: Photolysis or adsorption. It can be concluded that the photolytic process has relatively low effect in the paracetamol removal from wastewater under UV light irradiation.
Figure 1. Paracetamol removal in the stirred batch photoreactor using TiO2 suspension as photocatalyst.
Figure 1. Paracetamol removal in the stirred batch photoreactor using TiO2 suspension as photocatalyst.
Catalysts 05 00077 g001
The adsorption capacity of the studied photocatalytic material, TiO2 Degussa P25, can be observed in Figure 1, evaluating its degree of contribution in the global process of elimination of the contaminant. As can be seen, the adsorption capacity of tested material is negligible (achieving only a 2%–3% of paracetamol removal from wastewater after 4 h of adsorption treatment) for all tested TiO2 quantities.
The activity of TiO2 photocatalytically active phase was studied in the stirred photoreactor configuration and the influence of the photocatalyst amount in the photoreactor has been presented in Figure 1. It can be seen that the paracetamol removal reaches an approximately constant value after 2 h of photocatalytic treatment for all the quantities of photocatalyst tested achieving values in the range 99%–100% of contaminant removal after 4 h of irradiation time. Therefore, these results from photocatalytic decontamination process can be compared with those results obtained from previous paracetamol photolysis and paracetamol adsorption studies, confirming that the paracetamol removal is mainly due to the heterogeneous photocatalytic treatment. This fact indicates that this kind of emergent contaminants in water can be degraded and mineralized by photocatalytic treatment with TiO2 as photocatalyst, achieving a total elimination of contaminants from wastewater.
Moreover, the results show that the optimal photocatalyst amount is 0.50 g/L, knowing that further increases in the photocatalyst amount used do not increase the photocatalytic ability of the system. This is because when the photocatalyst amount suspended in wastewater is increased, the light path is obstructed in the water due to its turbidity increases causing an “shade” effect and, therefore, HO radical formation [26] and the effectiveness of the photocatalytic process induced by light is reduced.
Furthermore, a kinetic study of paracetamol degradation in water by photocatalysis was developed finding that the paracetamol degradation curves exhibit a mono-exponential trend, suggesting that a pseudo-first order reaction model can be applied to describe the kinetic behaviour [6,23,24,27,28,29] obtained from the TiO2 active phase acting as photocatalyst in the heterogeneous photocatalytic treatment. Pseudo-first order kinetics with respect to paracetamol concentration (C) may be expressed as:
  d C d t = k a p p C
Integration of this equation leads to following equation:
ln (C0/C) = kapp·t
where kapp is the apparent pseudo-first order rate constant, C0 is the initial paracetamol concentration and t is the photocatalytic reaction time or irradiation time. The values of kapp were obtained directly from the regression analysis of the plot of ln(C0/C) vs. photodegradation time for all experiments. Thus, Table 2 shows the kapp values obtained for all tested amounts of TiO2 Degussa P25 acting as photocatalyst.
Table 2. Apparent kinetic parameters for paracetamol photodegradation.
Table 2. Apparent kinetic parameters for paracetamol photodegradation.
Photocatalyst amount (g/L)kapp (min−1)
0.050.036
0.100.040
0.250.038
0.500.045
1.000.042
The pH influence in the paracetamol photodegradation was examined in the stirred photoreactor using the optimal photocatalyst amount (0.50 g/L of TiO2 Degussa P25) obtained from the previous kinetic study. As can be seen in the results presented in Figure 2, pH can also influence the contaminant degradation rate in the global photocatalytic process. The paracetamol removal curves show that the optimal pH is 8 and the degradation rate increases with increasing pH value. This can be attributed to enhanced formation of hydroxide ions, because at high pH more hydroxide ions available on TiO2 surface can be easily oxidized and form more hydroxide ions [30,31] which consequently increases the efficiency of paracetamol degradation. On the other hand, in Figure 2, the paracetamol removal decreased at pH 10 mainly due to surface ionization of TiO2. TiO2 surface is positively charged in acidic media and it is negatively charged at alkaline conditions. Increasing pH gradually increases the electrostatic repulsion between TiO2 surface and paracetamol [32] which is negatively charged at pH above 9.5, and the degradation rate of paracetamol is decreased at a pH higher than 9.5 [6].
Figure 2. Influence of pH on the paracetamol removal by heterogeneous photocatalysis.
Figure 2. Influence of pH on the paracetamol removal by heterogeneous photocatalysis.
Catalysts 05 00077 g002
The surface morphology of the glass spheres, TiO2 supported on glass spheres (TGS) and TGS, after being used for photocatalytic experiments were revealed by SEM. The SEM images (Figure 3) show that glass spheres that were TiO2 supported (TGS) exhibit a similar morphology before and after photocatalytic experiments, consequently, demonstrating that the procedure’s deposit of TiO2 active phase over glass spheres is efficient, and a stable support was achieved.
Figure 3. SEM images: (a) Glass sphere; (b) TiO2 supported on glass spheres (TGS); (c) TGS after photocatalytic experiments.
Figure 3. SEM images: (a) Glass sphere; (b) TiO2 supported on glass spheres (TGS); (c) TGS after photocatalytic experiments.
Catalysts 05 00077 g003
The paracetamol photodegradation with TGS acting as photocatalyst in the packed-bed photoreactor was evaluated studying first the influence of the wastewater flowrate along the packed-bed photoreactor on the degree of contaminant removal (Figure 4). The photolytic effect of the irradiation light used and the photocatalytic material adsorption capacity related to the global paracetamol removal was evaluated in this reactor configuration using the optimal flowrate in order to determinate the degree of contribution of both phenomenon in the global decontamination process.
Figure 4. Emerging paracetamol removal in the fixed-bed photoreactor system.
Figure 4. Emerging paracetamol removal in the fixed-bed photoreactor system.
Catalysts 05 00077 g004
As can be seen, the optimal photocatalytic activity was achieved using the lower flowrate along the packed-bed photoreactor (0.8 mL/s), reaching a constant value of paracetamol removal (approximately 42%) after 8 h of photocatalytic treatment. Meanwhile, the global paracetamol removal decreases for higher wastewater recirculation flowrates. In addition, the paracetamol removal shows an important increase after 4 h of photocatalytic treatment when 0.8 mL/s was used as wastewater flowrate, following a pattern similar to those observed in a photocatalytic process for the removal of a mixture of pharmaceuticals from wastewater [33]. These results can be explained by an increased oxidation rate of some intermediates in the photocatalytic process.
Additionally, from photolysis and adsorption studies, carried out with the optimal flowrate (0.8 mL/s), negligible paracetamol removal was observed after 23 h of treatment. This fact confirms that the paracetamol removal is only due to the heterogeneous photocatalytic treatment in the packed bed photoreactor.

3. Experimental Section

In this paper, the activity of TiO2 supported over glass spheres (TGS) as photocatalyst was studied evaluating the paracetamol (Acofarma, Llobregat, Spain) (as emergent contaminant model molecule) removal from wastewater. This heterogeneously photocatalyzed decontamination process, using photocatalyst particles in a packed-bed photoreactor configuration (crafted in our laboratory team), was compared with those results obtained from experiments using a TiO2 active phase (Degussa P25, Frankfurt, Germany) suspension in wastewater in a conventional stirred photoreactor.
The photocatalytically active material, TiO2 Degussa (Frankfurt, Germany) P25, was examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) in order to obtain the percentage of anatase and rutile phase. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption porosimetry and mercury porosimetry techniques were used to study its specific surface area and textural properties.
Glass spheres, in the range 2–3 mm diameter, were used as support material in order to configure a packed-bed reactor with TiO2 catalytically active phase. Before coating, the glass spheres were etched for 24 h in diluted hydrofluoric acid, washed thoroughly with deionized water and dried at 105 °C for 2 h. Titanium (IV) isopropoxide (Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) and ethanol were mixed with HCl. A hydroxide sol was obtained by hydrolysis of titanium (IV) isopropoxide. The surface modified glass spheres were immersed for 10 min in the hydroxide sol. Finally, glass spheres were dipped into suspension for 10 min and, after coating, they were dried at 105 °C and then calcinated at 450 °C for 2 h [34,35]. The procedure was repeated until the spheres were coated with five layers obtaining TiO2 supported over glass spheres (TGS) studied as photocatalyst.
The surface morphology and texture of the glass spheres and TGS were monitored by means of scanning electron microscope (SEM).
The paracetamol photodegradation process with TGS as photocatalyst was conducted in a packed bed photoreactor system (Figure 5). TGS were placed in the photocatalytic reactor (18 cm length, 0.6 cm internal diameter) and a solar radiation sodium vapour lamp (Philips, Amsterdam, Netherland, model 400-W G/92/2), placed at a distance of 50 cm from the packed-bed reactor, was used as light source (total radiation flux measured on the packed-bed surface was 160 mW/cm2). Paracetamol solution in water (50 mg/L) was introduced in the wastewater tank (250 mL), photoreactor temperature was kept constant at 20 °C and the paracetamol solution was recirculated along the system using a peristaltic pump; several samples were taken during 23 h of irradiation time and they were analysed by UV-Vis spectrophotometry determining the absorbance of paracetamol at λ = 244 nm, in order to study the degradation of paracetamol as contaminant in wastewater. The optimal wastewater recirculation flowrate was studied. Moreover, paracetamol photolysis (with light source and without photocatalyst) and paracetamol adsorption onto TGS (with photocatalyst and without light source) experiments were developed in order to evaluate its contribution to the emergent contaminant degradation or global wastewater decontamination process.
The study of the photocatalytic degradation of paracetamol with TiO2 active phase as photocatalyst suspension in wastewater was carried out in a stirred photoreactor (800 mL) using a UV radiation mercury lamp (Heraeus, Hanau, Germany, model TQ-150, 150 W) as light source. UV system is placed positioned coaxial inside reaction vessel (total radiation flux measured on the stirred photoreactor was 120 mW/cm2). In this photoreactor the temperature was kept constant at 20 °C, the paracetamol solution (50 mg/L) and the photocatalytic active phase in powder form (TiO2 Degussa P25) were introduced into the photoreactor and several samples were taken during 4 h of irradiation time and then analysed by UV-Vis spectrophotometry in order to follow the evolution of paracetamol concentration into the reactor. The optimal amount of photocatalyst and the pH influence were evaluated in this experimental system, pH was adjusted by using NaOH (0.1 M) or HCl (0.1 M). Additionally, paracetamol photolysis and adsorption phenomenon in this reactor configuration were evaluated.
Figure 5. Packed-bed photoreactor system and glass spheres photocatalytic bed in photoreactor.
Figure 5. Packed-bed photoreactor system and glass spheres photocatalytic bed in photoreactor.
Catalysts 05 00077 g005

4. Conclusions

The study of the stirred photoreactor reveals that TiO2 Degussa P25 shows a good photocatalytic activity for the paracetamol removal from wastewater, reaching a high photodegradation (between 99% and 100% of paracetamol removal after 4 h of irradiation) for all the amounts of photocatalyst tested.
It was concluded that the paracetamol degradation reaction by photocatalysis can be modeled by a pseudo-first-order kinetic equation and the optimal photocatalyst amount is 0.5 g/L obtaining a high photodegradation rate using the photocatalyst in suspension in wastewater. Photocatalytic activity is improved when water in the pH range of conventional domestic wastewater is treated.
Photocatalytic treatment in batch systems using the photocatalyst suspension in water shows disadvantages for treating high volumes of domestic or industrial wastewater, requiring a subsequent treatment after photodegradation of contaminants in order to separate the photocatalyst (TiO2 in powder form) from the treated water effluent.
A photocatalytic decontamination process using the photocatalytic active phase supported in glass spheres configuring a packed-bed system with continuous recirculating wastewater flow has been implemented. Good photodecomposition of the emergent contaminant has been achieved—approximately 42% of paracetamol removal from wastewater after 8 h of photocatalytic treatment in the photocatalytic packed-bed continuous system. This continuous system shows clear advantages from an industrial treatment of wastewater point of view. Photocatalytic materials remain confined to the packed-bed, and no separation step is necessary for obtaining decontaminated water effluent.

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by the project FOTOCAT of ‘‘Fundación Cajacanarias’’ and by Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Project ENE2013-47826-C4-1R). Authors thanks the kind collaboration of Jorge Méndez-Ramos (Physics Department, University of La Laguna).

Author Contributions

All authors were involved in the conception and design of the experiments, as well as the collection, analysis and interpretation of data and writing or editing of this manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hernando, M.D.; Mezcua, M.; Fernández-Alba, A.R.; Barceló, D. Environmental risk assessment of pharmaceutical residues in wastewater effluents, surface waters and sediments. Talanta 2006, 69, 334–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Miranda-García, N.; Suárez, S.; Sánchez, B.; Coronado, J.M.; Malato, S.; Maldonado, M.I. Photocatalytic degradation of emerging contaminants in municipal wastewater treatment plant effluents using immobilized TiO2 in a solar pilot plant. Appl. Catal. B 2011, 103, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, Z.; Hibberd, A.; Zhou, J.L. Analysis of emerging contaminants in sewage effluent and river water: Comparison between spot and passive sampling. Anal. Chimi. Acta 2008, 607, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Miranda-García, N.; Maldonado, M.I.; Coronado, J.M.; Malato, S. Degradation study of 15 emerging contaminants at low concentration by immobilized TiO2 in a pilot plant. Catal. Today 2010, 151, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schriks, M.; Heringa, M.B.; van der Kooi, M.M.E.; de Voogt, P.; van Wezel, A.P. Toxicological relevance of emerging contaminants for drinking water quality. Water Res. 2010, 44, 461–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yang, L.; Yu, L.E.; Madhumita, M.B. Degradation of paracetamol in aqueous solutions by TiO2 photocatalysis. Water Res. 2008, 42, 3480–3488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pelaez, M.; Nolan, N.T.; Pillai, S.C.; Seery, M.K.; Falaras, P.; Kontos, A.G.; Dunlop, P.S.M.; Hamilton, J.W.J.; Byrne, J.A.; O’Shea, K.; et al. A review on the visible light active titanium dioxide photocatalysts for environmental applications. Appl. Catal. B 2012, 125, 331–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sousa, M.A.; Gonçalves, C.; Vilar, V.J.P.; Boaventura, R.A.R.; Alpendurada, M.F. Suspended TiO2-assisted photocatalytic degradation of emerging contaminants in a municipal WWTP effluent using a solar pilot plant with CPCs. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 198–199, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Litter, M.I.; Quici, N. Photochemical advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment. Recent Pat. Eng. 2010, 4, 217–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lydakis-Simantiris, A.; Riga, D.; Katsivela, E.; Mantzavinos, D.; Xekoukoulotakis, N.P. Disinfection of spring water and secondary treated municipal wastewater by TiO2 photocatalysis. Desalination 2010, 250, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Robert, D.; Malato, S. Solar photocatalysis: A clean process for water detoxification. Sci. Total Environ. 2001, 291, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kositzi, M.; Poulios, I.; Malato, S.; Caceres, J.; Campos, A. Solar photocatalytic treatment of synthetic municipal wastewater. Water Res. 2004, 38, 1147–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wu, R.J.; Chen, C.C.; Lu, C.S.; Hsu, P.Y.; Chen, M.H. Phorate degradation by TiO2 photocatalysis: Parameter and reaction pathway investigations. Desalination 2010, 250, 869–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wei, Y.-L.; Chen, K.-W.; Wang, H.P. Study of Chromium Modified TiO2 Nano Catalyst under Visible Light Irradiation. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2010, 10, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bahadur, N.; Jain, K.; Srivastava, A.K.; Govind; Gakhar, R.; Haranath, D.; Dulat, M.S. Effect of nominal doping of Ag and Ni on the crystalline structure and photo-catalytic properties of mesoporous titania. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2010, 124, 600–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Peng, Y.-H.; Huang, G.-F.; Huang, W.-Q. Visible-light absorption and photocatalytic activity of Cr-doped TiO2 nanocrystal films. Adv. Powder Technol. 2012, 23, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Soutsas, K.; Karayannis, V.; Poulios, I.; Riga, A.; Ntampegliotis, K.; Spiliotis, X.; Papapolymerou, G. Decolorization and degradation of reactive azo dyes via heterogeneous photocatalytic processes. Desalination 2010, 250, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Liu, J.; Ma, M.; Chen, W.; Li, L. Activated carbon supported TiO2-photocatalysis doped with Fe ions for continuous treatment of dye wastewater in a dynamic reactor. J. Environ. Sci. 2010, 22, 1290–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Van Grieken, R.; Marugán, J.; Sordo, C.; Martínez, P.; Pablos, C. Photocatalytic inactivation of bacteria in water using suspended and immobilized silver-TiO2. Appl. Catal. B 2009, 93, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Borges, M.E.; Alvarez-Galván, M.C.; Esparza, P.; Medina, E.; Martín-Zarza, P.; Fierro, J.L.G. Ti-containing volcanic ash as photocatalyst for degradation of phenol. Energy Environ. Sci. 2008, 1, 364–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Palau, J.; Colomer, M.; Penya-Roja, J.M.; Martínez-Soria, V. Photodegradation of Toluene, m-Xylene, and n-Butyl Acetate and Their Mixtures over TiO2 Catalyst on Glass Fibers. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 5986–5994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Song, M.Y.; Park, Y.-K.; Jurng, J. Direct coating of V2O5/TiO2 nanoparticles onto glass beads by chemical vapor deposition. Powder Technol. 2012, 231, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, L.; Yu, L.E.; Madhumita, M.B. Photocatalytic Oxidation of Paracetamol: Dominant Reactants, Intermediates, and Reaction Mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 460–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Janus, M.; Morawski, A.W. New method of improving photocatalytic activity of commercial Degussa P25 for azo dyes decomposition. Appl. Catal. B 2007, 75, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wong, C.L.; Tan, Y.N.; Mohamed, A.R. A review on the formation of titania nanotube photocatalysts by hydrothermal treatment. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92, 1669–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mangalampalli, V.; Sharma, P.; Sadanandam, G.; Ratnamala, A.; Kumari, V.D.; Subrahmanyam, M. An efficient and novel porous nanosilica supported TiO2 photocatalyst for pesticide degradation using solar light. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 171, 626–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Akbarzadeh, R.; Umbarkar, S.B.; Sonawane, R.S.; Takle, S.; Dongare, M.K. Vanadia-titania thin films for photocatalytic degradation of formaldehyde in sunlight. Appl. Catal. A 2010, 374, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dalrymple, O.K.; Yeh, D.H.; Trotz, M.A. Removing pharmaceuticals and endocrine-disrupting compounds from wastewater by photocatalysis. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2007, 82, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dimitroula, H.; Daskalaki, V.M.; Frontistis, Z.; Kondarides, D.I.; Panagiotopoulou, P.; Xekoukoulotakis, N.P.; Mantzavinos, D. Solar photocatalysis for the abatement of emerging micro-contaminants in wastewater: Synthesis, characterization and testing of various TiO2 samples. Appl. Catal. B 2012, 117–118, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zheng, S.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, J.; Wang, B. A study on dye photoremoval on TiO2 suspension solution. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 1997, 108, 235–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Galindo, C.; Jacques, P.; Kalt, A. Photodegradation of deaminobenzene acid orange 52 by three advanced oxidation process: UV-H202, Uv-TiO2 and Vis- TiO2. Comparative mechanistic and kinetics investigation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2000, 130, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Brunner, M.; Schmiedberger, A.; Schmid, R.; Jager, D.; Piegler, E.; Eichler, H.; Muller, M. Direct assesment of peripheral pharmacokinetics in humans: Comparison between cantharides blister fluid sampling, in vivo microdialisys and saliva sampling. Br. Clin. Pharmacol. 1998, 46, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rizzo, L.; Meric, S.; Guida, M.; Kassinos, D.; Belgiorno, V. Heterogenous photocatalytic degradation kinetics and detoxification of an urban wastewater treatment plant effluent contaminated with pharmaceuticals. Water Res. 2009, 43, 4070–4078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hänel, A.; Morén, P.; Zaleska, A.; Hupka, J. Photocatalytic activity of TiO2 immobilized on glass beads. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2010, 45, 49–56. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kobayakawa, K.; Sato, C.; Sato, Y.; Fujishima, A. Continuous-flow photoreactor packed with titanium dioxide immobilized on large silica gel beads to decompose oxalic acid in excess water. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 1998, 118, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Borges, M.E.; García, D.M.; Hernández, T.; Ruiz-Morales, J.C.; Esparza, P. Supported Photocatalyst for Removal of Emerging Contaminants from Wastewater in a Continuous Packed-Bed Photoreactor Configuration. Catalysts 2015, 5, 77-87. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal5010077

AMA Style

Borges ME, García DM, Hernández T, Ruiz-Morales JC, Esparza P. Supported Photocatalyst for Removal of Emerging Contaminants from Wastewater in a Continuous Packed-Bed Photoreactor Configuration. Catalysts. 2015; 5(1):77-87. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal5010077

Chicago/Turabian Style

Borges, Mª Emma, Dulce María García, Tania Hernández, Juan Carlos Ruiz-Morales, and Pedro Esparza. 2015. "Supported Photocatalyst for Removal of Emerging Contaminants from Wastewater in a Continuous Packed-Bed Photoreactor Configuration" Catalysts 5, no. 1: 77-87. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal5010077

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop