Sonocatalytic Degradation of Malachite Green Using a Sustainable ZnO/Biochar Composite Derived from Phytoremediated Plant Residue: Process Optimisation via Response Surface Methodology
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Characterisation of Catalyst
2.2. Regression and Diagnostic Analysis
2.3. Optimisation and Response Surface Analysis
2.4. COD and TOC Analysis
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Chemicals
3.2. Synthesis of Catalyst
3.3. Characterisation of Catalyst
3.4. Evaluation of Sonocatalytic Performance
3.5. Optimisation Studies
3.6. Statistical Analysis
3.7. COD and TOC Analysis
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sharma, G.; Bhogal, S.; Gupta, V.K.; Agarwal, S.; Kumar, A.; Pathania, D.; Mola, G.T.; Stadler, F.J. Algal Biochar Reinforced Trimetallic Nanocomposite as Adsorptional/Photocatalyst for Remediation of Malachite Green from Aqueous Medium. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 275, 499–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albo Hay Allah, M.A.; Ibrahim, H.K.; Alshamsi, H.A.; Radhi Saud, H. Eco-Friendly Synthesis of Biochar Supported with Zinc Oxide as a Heterogeneous Catalyst for Photocatalytic Decontamination of Rhodamine B under Sunlight Illumination. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2024, 449, 115413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubangakene, N.O.; Elwardany, A.; Fujii, M.; Sekiguchi, H.; Elkady, M.; Shokry, H. Biosorption of Congo Red Dye from Aqueous Solutions Using Pristine Biochar and ZnO Biochar from Green Pea Peels. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2023, 189, 636–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jajko-Liberka, G.; Anagha, M.G.; Chytrosz-Wróbel, P.; Kubisiak, P.; Kulig, W.; Cwiklik, L.; Kotarba, A. Sonochemical Synthesis of Nanoparticles from Bioactive Compounds: Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Ultrason. Sonochemistry 2025, 121, 107559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trinh, Q.T.; Golio, N.; Cheng, Y.; Cha, H.; Tai, K.U.; Ouyang, L.; Zhao, J.; Tran, T.S.; Nguyen, T.-K.; Zhang, J.; et al. Sonochemistry and Sonocatalysis: Current Progress, Existing Limitations, and Future Opportunities in Green and Sustainable Chemistry. Green Chem. 2025, 27, 4926–4958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonçalves, M.G.; da Silva Veiga, P.A.; Fornari, M.R.; Peralta-Zamora, P.; Mangrich, A.S.; Silvestri, S. Relationship of the Physicochemical Properties of Novel ZnO/Biochar Composites to Their Efficiencies in the Degradation of Sulfamethoxazole and Methyl Orange. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 748, 141381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, B.; Zhu, J.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Liu, D.; Chen, C.; Sun, B. Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue Using ZnO Modified with Nano-Biochar Derived from Bacterial Cellulose. Ceram. Int. 2025, 51, 14948–14956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dumbrava, A.; Matei, C.; Diacon, A.; Moscalu, F.; Berger, D. Novel ZnO-Biochar Nanocomposites Obtained by Hydrothermal Method in Extracts of Ulva Lactuca Collected from Black Sea. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 10003–10013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chi, W.; Yu, F.; Dong, G.; Zhang, W.; Chai, D.F.; Han, P.; Zhao, M.; Li, J.; Zhang, X. A Novel Peony-Shaped ZnO/Biochar Nanocomposites with Dominant {100} Facets for Efficient Adsorption and Photocatalytic Removal of Refractory Contaminants. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024, 695, 134291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velumani, M.; Rajamohan, S.; Pandey, A.; Pham, N.D.K.; Nguyen, V.G.; Hoang, A.T. Nanocomposite from Tannery Sludge-Derived Biochar and Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles for Photocatalytic Degradation of Bisphenol A toward Dual Environmental Benefits. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 907, 167896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bhakta, A.K.; Tang, M.; Snoussi, Y.; Khalil, A.M.; Mascarenhas, R.J.; Mekhalif, Z.; Abderrabba, M.; Ammar, S.; Chehimi, M.M. Sweety, Salty, Sour, and Romantic Biochar-Supported ZnO: Highly Active Composite Catalysts for Environmental Remediation. Emergent Mater. 2025, 8, 2647–2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiwari, N.; Chakrabortty, S.; Samal, K.; Moulick, S.; Mohapatra, B.G.; Samanta, S.; Mohapatra, P.K.; Sanjay, K.; Nayak, J.; Banerjee, S.; et al. Photocatalytic Degradation of Malachite Green Using TiO2 and ZnO Impregnated on Fecal Sludge Derived Biochar. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2023, 145, 104800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahlawat, W.; Dilbaghi, N.; Kumar, R.; Singhal, N.K.; Kaushik, A.; Kumar, S. Adsorption of Harmful Dyes and Antimicrobial Studies Utilizing Recyclable ZnO, Its Composites with Conventionally Used Activated Carbon, and Waste Orange Peel as a Greener Approach. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 110268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joesna, G.; Alodhayb, A.; Sasikumar, P.; Sree, T.L.; Ferin, R.Z.; Sankar, D.; Prabakaran, A.; Prasath, M.; Muthuramamoorthy, M.; Mohamed, M.G.; et al. Bio- Synthesis Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle: Azadirachta Indica and Phyllanthus Acidus Mediated Green Approach for Enhanced Biological Efficacy. Chem. Phys. Impact 2025, 10, 100821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kabekkodu, S.N.; Dosen, A.; Blanton, T.N. PDF-5+: A Comprehensive Powder Diffraction FileTM for Materials Characterization. Powder Diffr. 2024, 39, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Gaashani, R.; Radiman, S.; Daud, A.R.; Tabet, N.; Al-Douri, Y. XPS and Optical Studies of Different Morphologies of ZnO Nanostructures Prepared by Microwave Methods. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 2283–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, H.; Sun, L.; Gao, Y.; Wang, T.; Huang, Y.; Lv, C.; Zhang, Y.F.; Huang, Q.; Chen, X.; Wu, H. Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticle-Anchored Biochar Composites for the Selective Removal of Perrhenate, a Surrogate for Pertechnetate, from Radioactive Effluents. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 387, 121670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lourenco, M.A.O.; Zeng, J.; Jagdale, P.; Castellino, M.; Sacco, A.; Farkhondehfal, M.A.; Pirri, C.F. Biochar/Zinc Oxide Composites as Effective Catalysts for Electrochemical CO2 Reduction. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 5445–5453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonçalves, N.P.F.; Lourenço, M.A.O.; Baleuri, S.R.; Bianco, S.; Jagdale, P.; Calza, P. Biochar Waste-Based ZnO Materials as Highly Efficient Photocatalysts for Water Treatment. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Y.; Wang, Y.; Hu, J.; Wang, K.; Zhai, Y.; Chen, Y.; Duan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, W. Photocatalytic Property Correlated with Microstructural Evolution of the Biochar/ZnO Composites. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 11, 1308–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tharayil, J.M.; Chinnaiyan, P.; Ramasamy, B.; Sathasivan, A. Biogenic Synthesis of Cu/ZnO Functionalized Biochar Composite: A Sustainable Approach for Visible Light-Photocatalytic Degradation. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2025, 39, 104337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaber, M.M.; Shokry, H.; Samy, M.; El-Bestawy, E.A. Green Approach for Fabricating Hybrids of Food Waste-Derived Biochar/Zinc Oxide for Effective Degradation of Bromothymol Blue Dye in a Photocatalysis/Persulfate Activation System. Chemosphere 2024, 364, 143245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, R.; Li, M.; Zhang, Q. Collaborative Optimization for the Performance of ZnO/Biochar Composites on Persulfate Activation through Plant Enrichment-Pyrolysis Method. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 429, 132294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghandali, M.V.; Safarzadeh, S.; Ghasemi-Fasaei, R.; Zeinali, S. Heavy Metals Immobilization and Bioavailability in Multi-Metal Contaminated Soil under Ryegrass Cultivation as Affected by ZnO and MnO2 Nanoparticle-Modified Biochar. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 10684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Munir, R.; Ali, K.; Naqvi, S.A.Z.; Muneer, A.; Bashir, M.Z.; Maqsood, M.A.; Noreen, S. Green Metal Oxides Coated Biochar Nanocomposites Preparation and Its Utilization in Vertical Flow Constructed Wetlands for Reactive Dye Removal: Performance and Kinetics Studies. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2023, 256, 104167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kaur, M.; Kaur, H. Synergistic Effect of Biochar Impregnated with ZnO Nano-Flowers for Effective Removal of Organic Pollutants from Wastewater. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 2022, 12, 100339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Redjili, S.; Ghodbane, H.; Tahraoui, H.; Abdelouahed, L.; Chebli, D.; Ola, M.S.; Assadi, A.A.; Kebir, M.; Zhang, J.; Amrane, A.; et al. Green Innovation: Multifunctional Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Quercus Robur for Photocatalytic Performance, Environmental, and Antimicrobial Applications. Catalysts 2025, 15, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tai, J.W.; Pang, Y.L.; Steven, L.; Chong, W.C. Phytoremediation of Zinc Ions from Aquatic Macrophytes. Key Eng. Mater. 2024, 1002, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Geng, Y.; Han, G.; Cao, Y.; Peng, W.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, T.A.; Dou, Z. A Perspective of Stepwise Utilization of Hazardous Zinc Plant Purification Residue Based on Selective Alkaline Leaching of Zinc. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 389, 122090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, D.; Liu, H.; Ma, Y.; Qu, J.; Guan, J.; Lu, N.; Lu, Y.; Yuan, X. Recycling of Hyper-Accumulator: Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles and Photocatalytic Degradation for Dichlorophenol. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 680, 500–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]









| Standard Order | Point Type | Coded Independent Variable Levels | Dye Removal Efficiency (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dye Concentration, (mg/L) |
Catalyst Loading, (g/L) | Time, (min) | Experimental Value | Predicted Value | ||
| 1 | Fact | 100 (−1) | 0.4 (−1) | 10 (−1) | 75.41 | 75.38 |
| 2 | Fact | 200 (+1) | 0.4 (−1) | 10 (−1) | 43.17 | 42.49 |
| 3 | Fact | 100 (−1) | 0.8 (+1) | 10 (−1) | 77.32 | 77.56 |
| 4 | Fact | 200 (+1) | 0.8 (+1) | 10 (−1) | 49.84 | 49.74 |
| 5 | Fact | 100 (−1) | 0.4 (−1) | 20 (+1) | 91.83 | 91.62 |
| 6 | Fact | 200 (+1) | 0.4 (−1) | 20 (+1) | 50.31 | 49.76 |
| 7 | Fact | 100 (−1) | 0.8 (+1) | 20 (+1) | 98.8 | 99.17 |
| 8 | Fact | 200 (+1) | 0.8 (+1) | 20 (+1) | 62.65 | 62.37 |
| 9 | Axial | 65.91 (−α) | 0.6 (0) | 15 (0) | 95.71 | 95.34 |
| 10 | Axial | 234.09 (+α) | 0.6 (0) | 15 (0) | 35.92 | 36.73 |
| 11 | Axial | 150 (0) | 0.26 (−α) | 15 (0) | 63.52 | 64.24 |
| 12 | Axial | 150 (0) | 0.94 (+α) | 15 (0) | 76.97 | 76.68 |
| 13 | Axial | 150 (0) | 0.6 (0) | 6.59 (−α) | 57.46 | 57.65 |
| 14 | Axial | 150 (0) | 0.6 (0) | 23.41 (+α) | 81.68 | 81.93 |
| 15 | Center | 150 (0) | 0.6 (0) | 15 (0) | 72.61 | 72.90 |
| 16 | Center | 150 (0) | 0.6 (0) | 15 (0) | 75.05 | 72.90 |
| 17 | Center | 150 (0) | 0.6 (0) | 15 (0) | 71.64 | 72.90 |
| 18 | Center | 150 (0) | 0.6 (0) | 15 (0) | 75.12 | 72.90 |
| 19 | Center | 150 (0) | 0.6 (0) | 15 (0) | 70.62 | 72.90 |
| 20 | Center | 150 (0) | 0.6 (0) | 15 (0) | 72.44 | 72.90 |
| Factors | Sum of Square | Degree of Freedom | Square Average | F-Value | Probability, p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quadratic model | 5211.67 | 9.00 | 579.07 | 301.09 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| 4145.72 | 1.00 | 4145.72 | 2155.55 | <0.0001 | ||
| 186.81 | 1.00 | 186.81 | 97.13 | <0.0001 | ||
| 711.63 | 1.00 | 711.63 | 370.01 | <0.0001 | ||
| 12.83 | 1.00 | 12.83 | 6.67 | 0.0273 | ||
| 40.28 | 1.00 | 40.28 | 20.94 | 0.0010 | ||
| 14.39 | 1.00 | 14.39 | 7.48 | 0.0210 | ||
| 84.94 | 1.00 | 84.94 | 44.16 | <0.0001 | ||
| 10.70 | 1.00 | 10.70 | 5.56 | 0.0401 | ||
| 17.44 | 1.00 | 17.44 | 9.07 | 0.0131 | ||
| Residual | 19.23 | 10.00 | 1.92 | |||
| Lack of Fit | 2.60 | 5.00 | 0.52 | 0.16 | 0.9686 | Insignificant |
| Pure Error | 16.63 | 5.00 | 3.33 | |||
| Corrected total | 5230.90 | 19.00 | ||||
| R2 = 0.9963; adequate precision = 62.68 | ||||||
| Variables | Factors | Unit | Actual Values for the Coded Levels | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −α | −1 | 0 | +1 | +α | |||
| Numerical | |||||||
| Dye concentration | mg/L | 65.91 | 100 | 150 | 200 | 234.09 | |
| Catalyst loading | g/L | 0.26 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.94 | |
| Time | min | 6.59 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 23.41 | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Tai, J.W.; Pang, Y.L.; Chen, W.-H.; Chih, Y.-K.; Lim, S.; Chong, W.C. Sonocatalytic Degradation of Malachite Green Using a Sustainable ZnO/Biochar Composite Derived from Phytoremediated Plant Residue: Process Optimisation via Response Surface Methodology. Catalysts 2026, 16, 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16040363
Tai JW, Pang YL, Chen W-H, Chih Y-K, Lim S, Chong WC. Sonocatalytic Degradation of Malachite Green Using a Sustainable ZnO/Biochar Composite Derived from Phytoremediated Plant Residue: Process Optimisation via Response Surface Methodology. Catalysts. 2026; 16(4):363. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16040363
Chicago/Turabian StyleTai, Jia Wei, Yean Ling Pang, Wei-Hsin Chen, Yi-Kai Chih, Steven Lim, and Woon Chan Chong. 2026. "Sonocatalytic Degradation of Malachite Green Using a Sustainable ZnO/Biochar Composite Derived from Phytoremediated Plant Residue: Process Optimisation via Response Surface Methodology" Catalysts 16, no. 4: 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16040363
APA StyleTai, J. W., Pang, Y. L., Chen, W.-H., Chih, Y.-K., Lim, S., & Chong, W. C. (2026). Sonocatalytic Degradation of Malachite Green Using a Sustainable ZnO/Biochar Composite Derived from Phytoremediated Plant Residue: Process Optimisation via Response Surface Methodology. Catalysts, 16(4), 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16040363

