1. Introduction
The conversion of carbon dioxide (CO
2) to transport fuels using hydrogen has the potential to integrate CO
2 capture with energy storage and conversion [
1,
2,
3]. In particular, synthetic aviation fuel (SAF) production using renewable H
2 and CO
2 is a promising pathway. The aviation industry faces significant challenges in reducing its climate impact. While direct electrification is feasible for other transportation sectors, hydrocarbons will remain the predominant fuel source for aircraft. SAF, produced via renewable hydrogen and carbon dioxide, is one of the few viable alternatives. This drop-in fuel can be synthesized via the well-established Fischer–Tropsch process [
4] or through the emerging methanol-to-jet route [
5]. Both pathways rely on syngas containing CO and H
2, which is produced via the selective CO
2 reduction process to CO. Traditional thermochemical conversion is achieved through the endothermic reverse water–gas shift (RWGS) reaction, which is limited by thermodynamic equilibrium, operating above 850 °C with limited single-pass CO
2 conversion. This high-temperature process demands significant energy input, complicates electrification and increases the risk of catalyst deactivation. A key challenge is optimizing a low-temperature process that maintains high conversion and selectivity. Conversion at lower temperatures (300–400 °C) can be significantly enhanced if the reaction product, water, is selectively removed [
6]. The principle of separation enhancement, based on Le Chatelier’s principle, shifts an equilibrium-limited reaction toward higher conversion by selectively removing reaction products [
7,
8]. Hydrophilic zeolites, such as Linde Type A (LTA) and Faujasite (FAU), exhibit strong water adsorption under RWGS conditions [
9,
10]. Recently, proof-of-concept studies have demonstrated the feasibility of a bifunctional catalyst (reactive sorbent) for sorption-enhanced RWGS, designated as COMAX, which integrates CO
2 activation and water adsorption in a single bead [
11,
12]. Platinum and copper are both recognized as effective catalysts for the (reverse) water–gas shift reaction [
13,
14]. Achieving sorption-enhanced RWGS activity requires custom-tailored zeolite-supported Pt and Cu catalysts that function as bifunctional reactive sorbents. A key consideration in designing these sorbents for CO
2 hydrogenation is preserving the water sorption capacity while introducing active components for CO
2 activation and reaction. Platinum is preferred due to its high intrinsic activity, allowing for lower loadings that minimize the disruption of water sorption sites. Additionally, Pt is less prone to deactivation at the preferred reactive adsorption temperatures (350–400 °C). This study presents the first cyclic demonstration of the longevity of the COMAX process with a bifunctional reactive sorbent under pressure swing mode in a single-column adsorption–blowdown–purge–repressurization cycle.
2. Results and Discussion
Figure 1 gives an example of the reactive adsorption result with a 0.3 wt%Pt-4A and a H
2:CO
2 of 3, at 25 bar(a) and 390 °C. Approximately a maximum of 93% conversion of CO
2 to CO is achieved by the simultaneous RWGS reaction and adsorption of the product water in the initial pre-breakthrough period. During the course of the reaction, the water product displaces a part of the CO
2 from the reaction sites, and the CO
2 and the CO first slowly proceed from the initially very high concentration toward near steady state concentration levels by the end of the 120 min. In the last part of this adsorption sequence, this process is accelerated by water breakthrough, i.e., the saturation of the sorbent. The excess of hydrogen in the reaction with CO
2 is aligned with the anticipated H
2:CO product gas required for downstream methanol synthesis and/or the Fischer–Tropsch reaction as part of a process integration towards SAF.
Process and cycle design focuses on the initial pre-breakthrough period in the reactive adsorption step with very high or maximum CO productivity, e.g., the initial 40 min that is shown in
Figure 1. The overall product distribution is listed in
Table 1. The amount of carbon that ends up in the methane becomes significant at the highest temperature of 390 °C.
Subsequently, 0.3 wt%Pt_4A on the kg scale (2 kg; 200 cm length, 3.8 cm internal diameter) was tested in pressure swing cyclic mode following the sequence of (reactive) adsorption (60 min), blowdown (10 min), purge (36 min) and repressurization (3 min), with the adsorption step feed flow from top to bottom of the column and the regeneration steps in reversed flow direction, and with a higher space velocity of 600 h−1 in the reactive adsorption step. From the preliminary screening of temperature, it was decided that the focus would be on the reactive sorption temperatures of 360 and 380 °C.
Figure 2 shows the products (GC analysis) with the H
2:CO
2 of 3 in the reactive adsorption step but only at the condition 600 h
−1 with a 100% H
2 purge flow and a 100% H
2 repressed flow condition.
Figure 2 shows the performance of the cyclic COMAX operation over time and at this fixed set of conditions only. The many periods without data in the graph represent the periods where the reactive adsorbent was exposed to other test conditions (feed and purge flow variations) that, although used at TNO for model validation, are out of the scope of this paper. The setpoint temperature is 360 °C on the left hand side of the dashed line and 380 °C on the right side of the dashed line. The concentration at various moments in time during the course of the experimental program is shown. The graph represents multiple measurements points per cycle, and throughout the cycle, the CO production decreases while the adsorbent becomes more saturated. This results in a range of concentrations illustrated by the ascending (CO
2) and descending (CO) patterns. From the maximum CO yield, it follows that the trend is initially somewhat downwards and the decay of the CO maximum concentration in the (approximately) 1100 h on the stream period seems to level off and eventually stabilizes at approximately 25% CO at 360 °C.
The post-test unloading of the reactor revealed that roughly 2% of the total recovered reactive sorbent were fines (sizes less than 500 μm). A test with 100 mbar steam in inert gas at 370 °C with the pre-test sorbent and post-test unloaded reactive sorbent after 50 days of operation did not indicate a loss of water sorption capacity. Tests with up to four times higher GHSV showed that the steady state concentrations of CO and CO
2 are the same: The catalytic functionality in the present study is largely over dimensioned and the decay of the CO yield in
Figure 2 is largely determined by sorption characteristics. As much as the largest part of the initial decay shown in
Figure 2 relates to incomplete regeneration.
Figure 3 gives an example of the CO evolution (NDIR analysis) during reactive adsorption at the setpoint of 360 °C and the regeneration together with the temperature profiles monitored at 70 cm and 100 cm in the reactor during these periods. During the reactive adsorption process, the temperature increases first and then it levels off to the setpoint, which was 360 °C during these cycles. During the regeneration, the temperature drops to 330 °C and then it reaches 360 °C only at the very end of the purge period. This means that for the majority of the purge time, the temperature was far below the setpoint and, as is known to the experts in the field, typically on the low side to fully regenerate molecular sieves in a time scale of minutes [
15].
In
Figure 4, the main trends obtained for the categories of side products during cyclic operation in the same period are shown. While most of these instantaneously disappear from the gas phase during regeneration (blowdown and purge), a very small fraction of the methanol appears to remain in the sorbent at the start of the next reactive adsorption step.
When we now make the same analysis for the sequence monitored at setpoint 380 °C, the positive impact of the higher temperature on the cyclic stability becomes obvious. First when we look at the right hand side of the dashed line in
Figure 2, the CO production monitored by µGC does not indicate any decay during the cycling, i.e., it appears very constant during the 60 cycles included in this sequence. This is shown in much more detail with the higher data resolution analysis as available from the NDIR gas analysis running in parallel and compiled in
Figure 5, which indeed shows a perfectly stable CO production.
Figure 6 shows an excerpt of the CO evolution (NDIR analysis) during reactive adsorption at 380 °C and the regeneration together with the temperature profiles monitored at 70 cm and 100 cm in the reactor during these periods. During the reactive adsorption process, the temperature increases first and then it levels off to the setpoint, which was 380 °C during these cycles. During the regeneration, the temperature drops to 350 °C and then it reaches 380 °C only at the very end of the purge. This means that for the majority of the purge time, the temperature was far below the setpoint temperature but the temperature never decreased below 350 °C, which is important to ensure the (near) complete regeneration of molecular sieves in a time scale of minutes.
In
Figure 7, the main trends obtained for the categories of side products during cyclic operation at 380 °C in the same period are shown. Similar to the situation at 360 °C, a very small fraction of the methanol appears to remain in the sorbent at the start of the next reactive adsorption step.
The formation of methane is slightly higher at the higher temperature of reactive sorption with approximately a 2.1% maximum, but this is only for a very short time in the very initial part of the sorption enhancement period that levels off to an almost 10-fold lower concentration within minutes on stream. A process design with COMAX integrated with a downstream FT reaction or methanol synthesis reaction would disfavor the formation of methane since, at best, it would be inert and would begin accumulating in (recycle) loops. Moreover, any loss of precious green hydrogen through formation of hydrocarbon should be avoided. Overall, it appears that good cyclic stability can be obtained in pressure swing cyclic operation, provided that the temperature during the regeneration steps is high enough to ensure near-complete dehydration (>350 °C).
3. Materials and Methods
Molecular sieve beads 4A zeolite (2–3 mm) were used for incipient wetness impregnation with H
2PtCl
6.6H
2O to obtain the reactive sorbent for COMAX with 0.3 wt% Pt loading. Prior to impregnation, the molecular sieve was first dried at 105 °C overnight. After the impregnation with the metal solution the obtained reactive sorbents were dried at 120 °C. Subsequently, the reactive sorbent was calcined in a furnace oven (Heraeus D-6450) at 400 °C (5 °C/min, 6 h dwell). The reactive sorbent was activated in situ with 10 °C/min in N
2 to 325 °C and subsequently in 10% N
2, 84% H
2 and 6% CO
2 with a dwell time of 4 h. Experimental runs with reactive adsorption steps at 25 bar(a) pressure were conducted on two high-pressure test rigs (see
Supplementary Materials). The first test rig, at a gram scale of reactive sorbent operated at low GHSV (250 h
−1), was used to analyze the type of products and side products in the reactive adsorption step and used to judge overall performance as a function of temperature of the reactive sorbent, prior to scaling up the synthesis. Here, adsorbent regeneration was performed in a co-current mode by a combination of both temperature and pressure swing (TPSA) by periodic switching to dry nitrogen, decreasing the pressure to 3 bar(a) and increasing the temperature to 400 °C. The second test rig, at a kilogram scale and 200 cm column length, enabled the use of up to 20 L/min total flow during the reactive adsorption step and the ability to adjust gas direction for counter-current regeneration with up to 50 L/min purge (hydrogen) gas following the pressure swing to atmospheric pressure. Heating was provided with electrical trace heating. During adsorption, this reactor was primarily operated at a higher space velocity of typically 600 h
−1 at temperatures up to 390 °C. Gas analysis was performed by a gas chromatograph (µGC, equipped with TCD and FID), non-dispersive IR analyzer (NDIR) and a mass spectrometer (MS).